<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//TaxonX//DTD Taxonomic Treatment Publishing DTD v0 20100105//EN" "https://vertebrate-zoology.arphahub.com/nlm/tax-treatment-NS0.dtd">
<article xmlns:tp="http://www.plazi.org/taxpub" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">104</journal-id>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="index">urn:lsid:arphahub.com:pub:f2cd1fff-21e4-581f-a7fa-850997197b7f</journal-id>
      <journal-id journal-id-type="aggregator">urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B1C81912-2D17-4CD8-8D2C-EFEAAAB2EF75</journal-id>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title xml:lang="en">Vertebrate Zoology</journal-title>
        <abbrev-journal-title xml:lang="en">VZ</abbrev-journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
      <issn pub-type="ppub">1864-5755</issn>
      <issn pub-type="epub">2625-8498</issn>
      <publisher>
        <publisher-name>Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung</publisher-name>
      </publisher>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3897/vz.76.e173627</article-id>
      <article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">173627</article-id>
      <article-categories>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
          <subject>Research Article</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="biological_taxon">
          <subject>Ctenomyidae</subject>
          <subject>Mammalia</subject>
          <subject>Rodentia</subject>
        </subj-group>
        <subj-group subj-group-type="scientific_subject">
          <subject>Anatomy</subject>
          <subject>Morphology</subject>
          <subject>Phylogeography</subject>
          <subject>Systematics</subject>
        </subj-group>
      </article-categories>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Resolving species boundaries in a recent evolutionary radiation: An integrative approach to the <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Corrientes group (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="class" reg="Mammalia">Mammalia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order" reg="Rodentia">Rodentia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Ctenomyidae">Ctenomyidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>)</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group content-type="authors">
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Caraballo</surname>
            <given-names>Diego A.</given-names>
          </name>
          <email xlink:type="simple">dcaraballo@ege.fcen.uba.ar</email>
          <uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0345-7861</uri>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A1">1</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A2">2</xref>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/">Conceptualization</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing - original draft</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing - review and editing</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/">Data curation</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/">Formal analysis</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/">Funding acquisition</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/">Investigation</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/">Methodology</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/project-administration/">Project administration</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/">Resources</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/">Supervision</role>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Campo</surname>
            <given-names>Denise H.</given-names>
          </name>
          <uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0038-0624</uri>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A2">2</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A3">3</xref>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing - original draft</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing - review and editing</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/">Data curation</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/">Formal analysis</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/">Investigation</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/">Methodology</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/">Visualization</role>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Teta</surname>
            <given-names>Pablo</given-names>
          </name>
          <uri content-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8694-0498</uri>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A3">3</xref>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/">Conceptualization</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing - original draft</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing - review and editing</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/data-curation/">Data curation</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/formal-analysis/">Formal analysis</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/">Funding acquisition</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/">Investigation</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/">Methodology</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/resources/">Resources</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/">Supervision</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/visualization/">Visualization</role>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
          <name name-style="western">
            <surname>Lanzone</surname>
            <given-names>Cecilia</given-names>
          </name>
          <email xlink:type="simple">cecilialanzone2016@gmail.com</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="A4">4</xref>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/conceptualization/">Conceptualization</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-original-draft/">Writing - original draft</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/writing-review-editing/">Writing - review and editing</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/funding-acquisition/">Funding acquisition</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/investigation/">Investigation</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/project-administration/">Project administration</role>
          <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/supervision/">Supervision</role>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <aff id="A1">
        <label>1</label>
        <addr-line content-type="verbatim">Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires, UBA-CONICET, Argentina</addr-line>
        <institution>División Mastozoología, Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia” (MACNBR), CONICET</institution>
        <addr-line content-type="city">Buenos Aires</addr-line>
        <country>Argentina</country>
        <uri content-type="ror">https://ror.org/001ecav82</uri>
      </aff>
      <aff id="A2">
        <label>2</label>
        <addr-line content-type="verbatim">Departamento de Ecología, Genética y Evolución, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina</addr-line>
        <institution>Departamento de Ecología, Genética y Evolución, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires</institution>
        <addr-line content-type="city">Buenos Aires</addr-line>
        <country>Argentina</country>
        <uri content-type="ror">https://ror.org/0081fs513</uri>
      </aff>
      <aff id="A3">
        <label>3</label>
        <addr-line content-type="verbatim">División Mastozoología, Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia” (MACNBR), CONICET, Argentina</addr-line>
        <institution>Instituto de Ecología, Genética y Evolución de Buenos Aires</institution>
        <addr-line content-type="city">Buenos Aires</addr-line>
        <country>Argentina</country>
      </aff>
      <aff id="A4">
        <label>4</label>
        <addr-line content-type="verbatim">Laboratorio de Genética Evolutiva, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Químicas y Naturales, IBS, CONICET-UNaM, Posadas, Misiones, Argentina</addr-line>
        <institution>Laboratorio de Genética Evolutiva, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Químicas y Naturales, IBS, CONICET-UNaM</institution>
        <addr-line content-type="city">Posadas</addr-line>
        <country>Argentina</country>
      </aff>
      <author-notes>
        <fn fn-type="corresp">
          <p>Corresponding authors: Diego A. Caraballo (<email xlink:type="simple">dcaraballo@ege.fcen.uba.ar</email>), Cecilia Lanzone (<email xlink:type="simple">cecilialanzone2016@gmail.com</email>)</p>
        </fn>
        <fn>
          <p>Academic editor Clara Stefen</p>
        </fn>
      </author-notes>
      <pub-date pub-type="collection">
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <pub-date pub-type="epub">
        <day>28</day>
        <month>05</month>
        <year>2026</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>76</volume>
      <fpage>317</fpage>
      <lpage>337</lpage>
      <uri content-type="arpha" xlink:href="http://openbiodiv.net/2401AB76-40D2-5D11-8C10-08874056C6CD">2401AB76-40D2-5D11-8C10-08874056C6CD</uri>
      <uri content-type="zoobank" xlink:href="https://zoobank.org/6F23F0C1-7346-423D-B089-1FD1937F8844">6F23F0C1-7346-423D-B089-1FD1937F8844</uri>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received">
          <day>01</day>
          <month>10</month>
          <year>2025</year>
        </date>
        <date date-type="accepted">
          <day>07</day>
          <month>05</month>
          <year>2026</year>
        </date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Diego A. Caraballo, Denise H. Campo, Pablo Teta, Cecilia Lanzone</copyright-statement>
        <license license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple">
          <license-p>This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.</license-p>
        </license>
      </permissions>
      <self-uri content-type="zoobank" xlink:type="simple">https://zoobank.org/6F23F0C1-7346-423D-B089-1FD1937F8844</self-uri>
      <abstract>
        <p>
          <bold>Abstract</bold>
        </p>
        <p>Species delimitation in recently evolving taxa presents unique challenges. Such taxa may not have accumulated enough genetic or morphological differences to be easily distinguished using traditional methods, while processes such as incomplete lineage sorting or gene flow may obscure these distinctions. One paradigmatic recently evolved taxon is the Corrientes group of the subterranean genus <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order" reg="Rodentia">Rodentia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family" reg="Ctenomyidae">Ctenomyidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>), a set of populations with different chromosomal forms occurring in the homonymous province of Argentina. Previously, three nominal species and several independently evolving lineages had been proposed; however, a comprehensive integrative approach—including qualitative and quantitative morphological analyses, as well as additional molecular proxies for lineage delimitation—was still lacking, and these results had not been evaluated in a taxonomic context. In this study, we added new lines of evidence, including Bayesian phylogenetics and divergence time estimation, haplotype networks, and genetic distances. We integrated this information with karyotypic and microsatellite data to discuss previously proposed lineages, as well as to analyze the evolutionary processes that shaped the history of this group. Finally, we analyzed the qualitative and quantitative morphology of individuals from the nominal species and a chromosomally derived lineage, and we propose a revised species-level and infraspecific classification for this complex group of rodents. This resulted in the delimitation of two species, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="roigi">roigi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="perrensi">perrensi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, the latter being subdivided into three subspecies: <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="perrensi">perrensi</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subspecies" reg="perrensi">perrensi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="perrensi">perrensi</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subspecies" reg="dorbignyi">dorbignyi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="perrensi">perrensi</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subspecies" reg="iberaensis">iberaensis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic><bold>subsp. nov</bold>. In addition, other identified lineages, such as Sarandicito, Manantiales, and Santa Rosa, deserve future taxonomic investigation.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <label>Keywords</label>
        <kwd>
          <italic>
            <tp:taxon-name>
              <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part>
            </tp:taxon-name>
          </italic>
        </kwd>
        <kwd>Iberá wetlands</kwd>
        <kwd>integrative taxonomy</kwd>
        <kwd>lineages</kwd>
        <kwd>species</kwd>
        <kwd>subspecies</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
      <funding-group>
        <award-group>
          <funding-source>
            <named-content content-type="funder_name">Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica</named-content>
            <named-content content-type="funder_identifier">501100003074</named-content>
            <named-content content-type="funder_ror">https://ror.org/03stxzb56</named-content>
            <named-content content-type="funder_doi">http://doi.org/10.13039/501100003074</named-content>
          </funding-source>
        </award-group>
      </funding-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec sec-type="Introduction" id="SECID0EWAAC">
      <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>The species as a taxonomic category has long been a topic of intense debate, being considered by many researchers as the only real category in nature; consequently, several concepts and methods for species identification and delimitation have been developed (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Coyne and Orr 2004</xref>). The growing volume of DNA data and analyses has led to the widespread use of phylogenetic approaches. These highlight reciprocal monophyly among the investigated lineages and a threshold of genetic divergence that depends on the taxonomic group as guiding criteria for species identification (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Baker and Bradley 2006</xref>). However, in recently evolving taxa, reciprocal monophyly in most molecular markers is probably achieved after species differentiation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Maddison 1997</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Funk and Omland 2003</xref>), which can begin and be triggered by any particular character (i.e., some specific genes or chromosomes which can or cannot be included among the analyzed loci). Integrative taxonomy incorporates multiple character sets (molecules, chromosomes, morphology, etc.) as different lines of evidence to identify species (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">de Queiroz 2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">Padial et al. 2010</xref>). This allows the recognition of cryptic diversity and is particularly important in the study of recently evolving taxa, in which differentiation is expected only in a few characters.</p>
      <p>South American rodents of the genus <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Blainville, 1826, commonly known as tuco-tucos, include more than 60 species that have mostly diversified in recent evolutionary times. They are the most diverse genus of subterranean rodents and one of the most species-rich among mammals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">D’Elía et al. 2021</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">De Santi et al. 2021</xref>). Nine major species groups can be recognized: <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys"/><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="boliviensis">boliviensis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys"/><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="frater">frater</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys"/><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="magellanicus">magellanicus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys"/><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="mendocinus">mendocinus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys"/><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="opimus">opimus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys"/><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="sociabilis">sociabilis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys"/><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="talarum">talarum</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys"/><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="torquatus">torquatus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys"/><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="tucumanus">tucumanus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">Parada et al. 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Brook et al. 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B78">Tomasco et al. 2024</xref>). During the past 30 years, chromosomal (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">Ortells et al. 1990</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B69">Reig et al. 1990</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Caraballo et al. 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Buschiazzo et al. 2018</xref>), morphological (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Fornel et al. 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Gardner et al. 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">D’Elía et al. 2021</xref>), and phylogenetic studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">Parada et al. 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B78">Tomasco et al. 2024</xref>) have contributed to the delimitation of species and species groups within <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. More recently, integrative taxonomy approaches have been applied to the delimitation of lineages or species (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">De Freitas et al. 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Buschiazzo et al. 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B75">Sánchez et al. 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Londoño-Gaviria et al. 2019</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B76">Teta and D’Elía 2020</xref>). However, there are still several forms of tuco-tucos that have not been corroborated as full species. Some of these involve a complex system of numerous populations informally referred to as the Corrientes group, which is part of the <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys"/><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">torquatus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> species group (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">Parada et al. 2011</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Caraballo et al. 2012</xref>).</p>
      <p>The rodents of the Corrientes group inhabit a fragmented area influenced by the Iberá wetlands in the Argentine province of Corrientes, between the Paraná and Uruguay rivers (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1</xref>). They are patchily distributed in sandy soils, suitable for digging. However, proximity to wetlands makes these habitats temporary and spatially unstable due to fluctuating water levels. Some of these populations have been proposed to represent three distinct species, based on morphological traits and karyotypic analyses: <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="dorbignyi">dorbignyi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Contreras &amp; Contreras, 1984), <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="roigi">roigi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Contreras, 1988), and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="perrensi">perrensi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Thomas, 1896). However, the taxonomic status of most populations remains unclear. The age of the Corrientes group has been estimated at 630,000 years before present (400,000–900,000 ybp) based on cytochrome <italic>b</italic> (<bold>cyt <italic>b</italic></bold>) sequences, including a partial representation of the total diversity of the group (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Caraballo and Rossi 2018</xref>; see also <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">De Santi et al. 2021</xref> for younger estimates). This relatively recent diversification explains both the minimal differentiation observed between populations and species and the discordance among character sets, which may be due to the retention of ancestral polymorphisms, random lineage sorting, as well as hybridization and introgression (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Maddison 1997</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Funk and Omland 2003</xref>).</p>
      <fig id="F1">
        <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/vz.76.e173627.figure1</object-id>
        <object-id content-type="arpha">B198AAD9-AC3F-50FA-B04E-0D0177C4042F</object-id>
        <label>Figure 1.</label>
        <caption>
          <p>Geographical distribution of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> from the Corrientes group. Numbered dots correspond to the following localities: 1 Arroyo Pehuajó, 2 Costa Mansión, 3 Estancia San Luis, 4 Mburucuyá, 5 Manantiales, 6 Loma Alta, 7 Pago Alegre, 8 Rincón de Ambrosio, 9 Colonia 3 de Abril, 10 Saladas Sur, 11 Saladas Centro, 12 Saladas Norte, 13 San Roque, 14 Goya, 15 Chavarría, 16 Paraje Sarandicito, 17 Mbarigüí, 18 Paraje Angostura, 19 San Alonso, 20 Paraje Caimán, 21 Loreto, 22 Curuzú Laurel, 23 San Miguel, 24 Santa Rosa, 25 Estancia La Tacuarita, 26 Contreras Cué. Dot colors indicate the assignment of localities to different lineages/species: <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="roigi">roigi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (dark green), <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="dorbignyi">dorbignyi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (blue), <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="perrensi">perrensi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (red), the Iberá lineage (purple), Sarandicito (orange), Santa Rosa (gray), and Manantiales (light green). The gray dashed outline represents the zone of genetic exchange between several lineages of the Corrientes group. The borders of South America (gray), Argentina (blue) and Corrientes (red) are shown at the top left.</p>
        </caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="vertebrate-zoology-76-317-g001.jpg" id="oo_1660553.jpg">
          <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1660553</uri>
        </graphic>
      </fig>
      <p>Various efforts, based on diverse information sources considered separately, have been made to bring order to the apparent chaos within the Corrientes group and to establish boundaries between different lineages (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2</xref>). Mitochondrial phylogenies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Caraballo et al. 2012</xref>), microsatellite (SSR) analyses (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Mirol et al. 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Fernández et al. 2012</xref>), and chromosomal studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">Ortells et al. 1990</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Ortells 1995</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Caraballo et al. 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Buschiazzo et al. 2018</xref>) have been conducted encompassing most localities of the Corrientes group, some of which are illustrated in Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2</xref>. However, these different character sets have produced partially incompatible groupings. Subsequently, an integrative analysis based on mitochondrial (<abbrev xlink:title="mitochondrial" id="ABBRID0ENMAC">mtDNA</abbrev>) phylogeny, microsatellite clusters, and chromosomal data proposed the delimitation of seven independently evolving lineages (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Caraballo and Rossi 2017</xref>): <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="dorbignyi">dorbignyi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="perrensi">perrensi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, Iberá (i and ii), <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="roigi">roigi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, Santa Rosa, and Sarandicito (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2c</xref>). However, this delimitation was made with a strong bias towards chromosomal differentiation (resulting in the oversplitting of lineages with minimal chromosomal differentiation and the overlooking of structure revealed by <abbrev xlink:title="mitochondrial" id="ABBRID0E1NAC">mtDNA</abbrev> and SSR clusters) and is not entirely compatible with other classifications (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Fernández et al. 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Bidau 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Freitas 2016</xref>). In addition, even though this delimitation differed from the current classification, the implications of these results were not evaluated in a taxonomic context.</p>
      <fig id="F2">
        <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/vz.76.e173627.figure2</object-id>
        <object-id content-type="arpha">B9D674AC-B710-546E-A1D4-02816F6675EA</object-id>
        <label>Figure 2.</label>
        <caption>
          <p>Classification schemes of the <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Corrientes group according to SSR clustering (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Mirol et al. 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Fernández et al. 2012</xref>) and integrative approaches (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Caraballo and Rossi 2017</xref>; this study).</p>
        </caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="vertebrate-zoology-76-317-g002.jpg" id="oo_1660554.jpg">
          <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1660554</uri>
        </graphic>
      </fig>
      <p>In this work, we tested the currently accepted species and lineages of the Corrientes group using a multidisciplinary approach proposed by integrative taxonomy. We added new lines of evidence to distinguish previously proposed lineages and discussed the taxonomy of this group. We performed a comprehensive molecular phylogeny to infer divergence times, representing the total diversity of the group and including three mitochondrial markers; we also inferred haplotype networks and compared genetic distances, integrating this information with karyotypic and microsatellite data to analyze the evolutionary processes underlying conflict in lineage delimitation. Additionally, to assess species-level differentiation, we studied the qualitative and quantitative morphology of individuals from the nominal species and one of the proposed lineages. As a result of this approach, we propose a revised species-level and infraspecific delimitation for this complex group of rodents (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2</xref>).</p>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="materials|methods" id="SECID0ELPAC">
      <title>Materials and Methods</title>
      <sec sec-type="Tested lineages" id="SECID0EPPAC">
        <title>Tested lineages</title>
        <p>The lineages to be tested are those proposed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Caraballo and Rossi (2017)</xref> (see above), plus a group of populations referred to as the Manantiales lineage, which formed a separate SSR cluster linked to <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="roigi">roigi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Fernández et al. 2012</xref>) (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Caraballo and Rossi (2017)</xref> classified Manantiales as a member of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="perrensi">perrensi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> based on partial chromosomal data and <abbrev xlink:title="mitochondrial" id="ABBRID0E3AAE">mtDNA</abbrev> affinities; however, SSR-based clustering contradicted this assignment. The sublineages previously identified as Iberá I and Iberá II were treated as a single lineage in the present study, as their differentiation was based solely on a single chromosomal rearrangement.</p>
        <table-wrap id="T1" position="float" orientation="portrait">
          <label>Table 1.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Detailed grouping of SSR clustering (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Mirol et al. 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Fernández et al. 2012</xref>), diploid and fundamental numbers (<abbrev xlink:title="analysis of diploid" id="ABBRID0ERBAE">2n</abbrev>/<abbrev xlink:title="fundamental numbers" id="ABBRID0EVBAE">FN</abbrev>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Caraballo et al. 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Buschiazzo et al. 2018</xref> and references therein), previous lineage ascription (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Caraballo and Rossi 2017</xref> and references therein), and current lineage/species delimitation (this study) of the 26 studied populations of the <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Corrientes group.</p>
          </caption>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Locality</bold>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Mirol et al. (2010)</xref>
                  </bold>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Fernández et al. (2012)</xref>
                  </bold>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Hierarchical clustering</bold>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold><abbrev xlink:title="analysis of diploid" id="ABBRID0EXDAE">2n</abbrev> ⁄ <abbrev xlink:title="fundamental numbers" id="ABBRID0E2DAE">FN</abbrev></bold>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Caraballo &amp; Rossi (2017)</bold>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>Species/lineage (this study)</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Arroyo Pehuajó</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">III</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">A</td>
                <td rowspan="7" colspan="1">A + B</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">48/80</td>
                <td rowspan="3" colspan="1">
                  <italic>
                    <tp:taxon-name>
                      <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="roigi">roigi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>
                  </italic>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="3" colspan="1">
                  <italic>
                    <tp:taxon-name>
                      <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="roigi">roigi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>
                  </italic>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Costa Mansión</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">III</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">A</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">48/80</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Estancia San Luis</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">—</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">A</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">48/80</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Mburucuyá</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">VI</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">B</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">58/84</td>
                <td rowspan="12" colspan="1">
                  <italic>
                    <tp:taxon-name>
                      <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="perrensi">perrensi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>
                  </italic>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="4" colspan="1">Manantiales</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Manantiales</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">VI</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">B</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">?</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Loma Alta</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">—</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">B</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">?</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Pago Alegre</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">VI</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">B</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">56/84</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Rincón de Ambrosio</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">V</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">I</td>
                <td rowspan="5" colspan="1">I</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">50/84</td>
                <td rowspan="8" colspan="1">
                  <italic>
                    <tp:taxon-name>
                      <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="perrensi">perrensi</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subspecies" reg="perrensi">perrensi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>
                  </italic>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Colonia 3 de Abril</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">V</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">I</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">50/84</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Saladas Sur</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">V</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">I</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">51/84</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Saladas Centro</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">V</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">I</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">54/84</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Saladas Norte</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">V</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">I</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">54–56/84</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">San Roque</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">IV</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">J</td>
                <td rowspan="4" colspan="1">J + K + L</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">62/84</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Goya</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">IV</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">J</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">50/84</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Chavarría</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">IV</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">K</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">56/84</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Paraje Sarandicito</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">I</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">L</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">70/84</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Sarandicito</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Sarandicito</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Mbarigüí</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">II</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">C</td>
                <td rowspan="2" colspan="1">C</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">70/84</td>
                <td rowspan="2" colspan="1">
                  <italic>
                    <tp:taxon-name>
                      <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="dorbignyi">dorbignyi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>
                  </italic>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="2" colspan="1">
                  <italic>
                    <tp:taxon-name>
                      <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="perrensi">perrensi</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subspecies" reg="dorbignyi">dorbignyi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>
                  </italic>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Paraje Angostura</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">II</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">C</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">70/84</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">San Alonso</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">—</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">F</td>
                <td rowspan="6" colspan="1">D + F + G + H</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">44/78</td>
                <td rowspan="5" colspan="1">Iberá</td>
                <td rowspan="5" colspan="1"><italic><tp:taxon-name>
                      <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="perrensi">perrensi</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subspecies" reg="iberaensis">iberaensis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic><bold>subsp. nov</bold>.</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Paraje Caimán</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">VII</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">H</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">45–46/78</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Loreto</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">VII</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">D</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">42/76</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Curuzú Laurel</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">VII</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">H</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">42/76</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">San Miguel</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">VII</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">G</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">44/76</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Santa Rosa</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">IV</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">G</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">65–66/86</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Undefined</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Santa Rosa</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Estancia La Tacuarita</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">VIII</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">E</td>
                <td rowspan="2" colspan="1">E</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">42/76</td>
                <td rowspan="2" colspan="1">Iberá</td>
                <td rowspan="2" colspan="1"><italic><tp:taxon-name>
                      <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="perrensi">perrensi</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subspecies" reg="iberaensis">iberaensis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic><bold>subsp. nov</bold>.</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">Contreras Cué</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">VIII</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">E</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">41–42/76</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Karyotypic differentiation" id="SECID0EIVAE">
        <title>Karyotypic differentiation</title>
        <p>To gain more insight into karyotypic differentiation in the Corrientes group, we compared the <abbrev xlink:title="analysis of diploid" id="ABBRID0EOVAE">2n</abbrev>/<abbrev xlink:title="fundamental numbers" id="ABBRID0ESVAE">FN</abbrev> formulas of all lineages and summarized the minimum number of structural rearrangements among the three recognized species (using the karyotype of their type localities) and Iberá (using the more widespread karyotype, <abbrev xlink:title="analysis of diploid" id="ABBRID0EWVAE">2n</abbrev> = 42, <abbrev xlink:title="fundamental numbers" id="ABBRID0E1VAE">FN</abbrev> = 76), inferred from G-banding patterns (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Ortells 1995</xref>).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Phylogenetic analysis and divergence time estimation" id="SECID0ECWAE">
        <title>Phylogenetic analysis and divergence time estimation</title>
        <p>A total of 42 mitochondrial haplotypes from Corrientes, consisting of partial cytochrome <italic>b</italic> (<bold>cyt <italic>b</italic></bold>), cytochrome oxidase I (<bold><abbrev xlink:title="cytochrome oxidase I" id="ABBRID0EPWAE">COI</abbrev></bold>), and control region (<bold><abbrev xlink:title="control region" id="ABBRID0EUWAE">CR</abbrev></bold>) sequences obtained from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Caraballo et al. (2012</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">2016</xref>; File S1), were used to infer phylogenetic relationships and estimate divergence times (GenBank accession numbers <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" xlink:href="JX275502" xlink:type="simple">JX275502</ext-link>–<ext-link ext-link-type="gen" xlink:href="JX275655" xlink:type="simple">JX275655</ext-link> and <ext-link ext-link-type="gen" xlink:href="KT818638" xlink:type="simple">KT818638</ext-link>–<ext-link ext-link-type="gen" xlink:href="KT818684" xlink:type="simple">KT818684</ext-link>). The alignment comprised a total of 2178 bp, including 693 bp from <abbrev xlink:title="cytochrome oxidase I" id="ABBRID0EUXAE">COI</abbrev>, 1079 bp from cyt <italic>b</italic>, and 406 bp from the control region. Genes were concatenated from single individuals (there are no chimeric sequences). A Bayesian phylogenetic analysis was performed using BEAST v2.7.7 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Bouckaert et al. 2019</xref>), allowing for different substitution rates for each locus, estimated with MrModeltest (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Nylander 2004</xref>), all of them being HKY + I + G. Two haplotypes from the sister group <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="pearsoni">pearsoni</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (from Médanos, Entre Ríos, Argentina) were included as outgroups. A Yule tree prior and a relaxed lognormal clock were used for 5 × 10<sup>7</sup> Markov Chain Monte Carlo (<bold><abbrev xlink:title="Markov Chain Monte Carlo" id="ABBRID0EQYAE">MCMC</abbrev></bold>) generations in two independent chains, sampling every 5 × 10<sup>3</sup> generations, with a burn-in of 10%. Convergence of the <abbrev xlink:title="Markov Chain Monte Carlo" id="ABBRID0EWYAE">MCMC</abbrev> runs was confirmed using Tracer v1.7.2 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B68">Rambaut et al. 2018</xref>). Different clock rate priors for each marker were used based on the literature, with values of 0.02 and 0.0295 substitutions/site/million years for cyt <italic>b</italic> and <abbrev xlink:title="control region" id="ABBRID0EAZAE">CR</abbrev>, respectively (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Caraballo and Rossi 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Carnovale et al. 2021</xref>). In the case of <abbrev xlink:title="cytochrome oxidase I" id="ABBRID0EMZAE">COI</abbrev>, as there are no reported rates for caviomorphs, we used the same value as cyt <italic>b</italic>, based on a broad mammalian comparative study, which found that average between-species <abbrev xlink:title="cytochrome oxidase I" id="ABBRID0ESZAE">COI</abbrev> divergence is often comparable to that of cyt <italic>b</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B77">Tobe et al. 2010</xref>). Trees were visualized in FigTree v1.4.4 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B67">Rambaut 2014</xref>).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Coalescent-based delimitation analysis" id="SECID0EA1AE">
        <title>Coalescent-based delimitation analysis</title>
        <p>A Poisson Tree Processes (<bold><abbrev xlink:title="Poisson Tree Processes" id="ABBRID0EH1AE">PTP</abbrev></bold>) model was applied to infer putative species boundaries on a given phylogenetic input tree, using the software bPTP (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B81">Zhang et al. 2013</xref>). The topology obtained in the BEAST analysis was used as input, running the program for 1 x 10<sup>5</sup><abbrev xlink:title="Markov Chain Monte Carlo" id="ABBRID0ER1AE">MCMC</abbrev> generations, with a burn-in of 10%.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Network analysis" id="SECID0EV1AE">
        <title>Network analysis</title>
        <p>The nucleotide alignment used in the phylogenetic analysis was utilized to infer a haplotype network. A median-joining network was obtained using the software PopArt (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Leigh and Bryant 2015</xref>), for each marker separately, and for the concatenated dataset.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Genetic distance analysis" id="SECID0E61AE">
        <title>Genetic distance analysis</title>
        <p>To compare the genetic distances between members of the Corrientes group and the rest of the genus, we generated a major p-distance table with all available <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> cyt <italic>b</italic> sequences (Table SS1). A total of 823 partial or complete cyt <italic>b</italic> sequences were downloaded from GenBank. This dataset was curated by updating species names under the current taxonomy and retaining only sequences from which we could corroborate species status. Short sequences (e.g., fossil sequences) that produced no overlap with other sequences and pseudogenes were removed. The final alignment comprises 361 nucleotide sequences belonging to 49 <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> species, plus 46 sequences that correspond to the Corrientes group. Corrientes group sequences were grouped according to each putative species/lineage: <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="perrensi">perrensi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="dorbignyi">dorbignyi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="roigi">roigi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, Iberá, Santa Rosa, Sarandicito, and Manantiales.</p>
        <p>Pairwise genetic distances were calculated with MEGA 11 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B74">Tamura et al. 2021</xref>). We used the uncorrected p-distance since this is used in broad comparisons of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B62">Parada et al. 2011</xref>), and this mitochondrial gene displayed a relatively low genetic variability. Sequences were grouped according to each species and three types of genetic distances were computed: intraspecific distances, interspecific distances, and distances among the Corrientes group as a third test category. Within Corrientes, only putative interspecific distances were considered, since the aim of this analysis was to test if these distances were comparable to intra- or interspecific distances in other species. A histogram displaying distance frequencies was generated with ggplot2 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B79">Wickham 2016</xref>). The same procedure was applied using only sequences from the <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys"/><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">torquatus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> group, to which the Corrientes group lineages belong, to have a direct comparison with more closely related species, with a smaller bias towards high distance values found between less-related species in the <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> phylogeny. To assess the presence of a barcode gap between intraspecific and interspecific genetic distances, we used the bgd function from the spider R package (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Brown et al. 2012</xref>). This method evaluates the overlap between the distributions of pairwise distances within and among species to statistically test for the existence of a barcode gap.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Morphological analysis" id="SECID0EB5AE">
        <title>Morphological analysis</title>
        <sec sec-type="Studied specimens" id="SECID0EF5AE">
          <title>Studied specimens</title>
          <p>Morphological analyses were conducted on 74 specimens of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> from Corrientes province. These specimens are housed in the biological collections of Fundación de Historia Natural “Félix de Azara” (<abbrev xlink:title="Fundación de Historia Natural “Félix de Azara”" id="ABBRID0ES5AE">CFA-MA</abbrev>, Buenos Aires, Argentina) and Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia” (<abbrev content-type="institution" xlink:title="Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia”" id="ABBRID0EW5AE">MACN</abbrev>, Buenos Aires, Argentina). Samples in our study included topotypes of the three nominal species referred for Corrientes: <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="dorbignyi">dorbignyi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (n = 22), <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="perrensi">perrensi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (n = 21), and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="roigi">roigi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (n = 17), as well as the available specimens (n = 14) for localities where the Iberá lineage has been reported (Table SS2). A total of 17 craniodental measurements were obtained from each specimen using a digital caliper with a precision of 0.01 mm, following descriptions and definitions provided by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Contreras and Contreras (1984)</xref>; these include: total length of the skull (<bold><abbrev xlink:title="total length of the skull" id="ABBRID0ECAAG">TLS</abbrev></bold>), condyle-incisive length (<bold><abbrev xlink:title="condyle-incisive length" id="ABBRID0EHAAG">CIL</abbrev></bold>), nasal length (<bold><abbrev xlink:title="nasal length" id="ABBRID0EMAAG">NL</abbrev></bold>), nasal width (<bold><abbrev xlink:title="nasal width" id="ABBRID0ERAAG">NW</abbrev></bold>), rostral width (<bold><abbrev xlink:title="rostral width" id="ABBRID0EWAAG">RW</abbrev></bold>), frontal length (<bold><abbrev xlink:title="frontal length" id="ABBRID0E2AAG">FL</abbrev></bold>), interorbital constriction (<bold><abbrev xlink:title="interorbital constriction" id="ABBRID0EABAG">IOC</abbrev></bold>), greatest zygomatic breadth (<bold><abbrev xlink:title="greatest zygomatic breadth" id="ABBRID0EFBAG">ZB</abbrev></bold>), braincase breadth (<bold><abbrev xlink:title="braincase breadth" id="ABBRID0EKBAG">BB</abbrev></bold>), bimeatal breadth (<bold><abbrev xlink:title="bimeatal breadth" id="ABBRID0EPBAG">BMB</abbrev></bold>), mastoid breadth (<bold><abbrev xlink:title="mastoid breadth" id="ABBRID0EUBAG">MB</abbrev></bold>), infraorbital foramen length (<bold><abbrev xlink:title="infraorbital foramen length" id="ABBRID0EZBAG">IFL</abbrev></bold>), upper diastema length (<bold><abbrev xlink:title="diastema length" id="ABBRID0E5BAG">DL</abbrev></bold>), palatal length (<bold><abbrev xlink:title="palatal length" id="ABBRID0EDCAG">PL</abbrev></bold>), upper incisors width (<bold><abbrev xlink:title="upper incisors width" id="ABBRID0EICAG">UIW</abbrev></bold>), upper toothrow length (<bold><abbrev xlink:title="upper toothrow length" id="ABBRID0ENCAG">UTL</abbrev></bold>), and upper fourth premolar length (<bold><abbrev xlink:title="upper fourth premolar length" id="ABBRID0ESCAG">PM4L</abbrev></bold>). For a complete list of studied specimens, vouchers, and measurements, see Table SS2.</p>
        </sec>
        <sec sec-type="Qualitative and quantitative morphological analyses" id="SECID0EWCAG">
          <title>Qualitative and quantitative morphological analyses</title>
          <p>Morphological comparisons between lineages were based on geography, current taxonomic classifications, and the results of molecular data analyses (this work). We evaluated craniodental characters by analyzing the following cranial regions in great detail: rostrum, zygomatic arch, palate, orbit, interorbital region, braincase, cranial foramina, mandible, and molars; to do this, we used the morphological characters defined by De Santi et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">2020</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">2021</xref>) as the starting point. Anatomical terminology follows De Santi et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">2020</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">2021</xref>) and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Brook et al. (2022)</xref>. Descriptive statistics (i.e., mean, minimum and maximum values, standard deviation) and multivariate statistical analyses were used to assess the patterns of morphometric variation within and between lineages. A principal component analysis (<bold><abbrev xlink:title="principal component analysis" id="ABBRID0ERDAG">PCA</abbrev></bold>) was conducted using the 17 craniodental measurements described above, all of which were previously transformed using a base-10 logarithm (<bold>log<sub>10</sub></bold>). Principal components (<bold><abbrev xlink:title="Principal components" id="ABBRID0E1DAG">PCs</abbrev></bold>) were extracted from a variance-covariance matrix (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B73">Strauss 2010</xref>) to identify the contribution of each measurement to the total variance. A discriminant function analysis (<bold><abbrev xlink:title="discriminant function analysis" id="ABBRID0EDEAG">DFA</abbrev></bold>) was conducted to explore morphometric differentiation within and between lineages. Each sex was analyzed separately to avoid intra-group variation due to sexual dimorphism. Multivariate analysis of variance (<bold><abbrev xlink:title="Multivariate analysis of variance" id="ABBRID0EIEAG">MANOVA</abbrev></bold>) was carried out to test the statistical significance of differences between groups of males and females of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="dorbignyi">dorbignyi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (n = 22), <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="perrensi">perrensi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (n = 21), <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="roigi">roigi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (n = 17), and the Iberá lineage (n = 14). All statistical analyses were performed using the software PAST v4.13 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Hammer et al. 2001</xref>).</p>
        </sec>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="Results" id="SECID0ERFAG">
      <title>Results</title>
      <sec sec-type="Karyotypic differentiation" id="SECID0EVFAG">
        <title>Karyotypic differentiation</title>
        <p>The analysis of diploid (<abbrev xlink:title="analysis of diploid" id="ABBRID0E2FAG">2n</abbrev>) and fundamental numbers (<abbrev xlink:title="fundamental numbers" id="ABBRID0E6FAG">FN</abbrev>) of the different lineages of the Corrientes group shows at least four breaks that can be interpreted as complex rearrangements that involve changes in the <abbrev xlink:title="fundamental numbers" id="ABBRID0EDGAG">FN</abbrev> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3A</xref>). Lineages such as <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="dorbignyi">dorbignyi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="perrensi">perrensi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, Manantiales, and Sarandicito can be grouped in an <abbrev xlink:title="fundamental numbers" id="ABBRID0EBHAG">FN</abbrev> 84 group, probably differing only in Robertsonian translocations. In contrast, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="roigi">roigi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> appears as a more reorganized karyotype (<abbrev xlink:title="fundamental numbers" id="ABBRID0EQHAG">FN</abbrev> 80), different from the <abbrev xlink:title="fundamental numbers" id="ABBRID0EUHAG">FN</abbrev> 84 group, but also from the Iberá karyotypes (<abbrev xlink:title="fundamental numbers" id="ABBRID0EYHAG">FN</abbrev> 76–78). Finally, Santa Rosa appears as a different karyomorph, probably more related to the <abbrev xlink:title="fundamental numbers" id="ABBRID0E3HAG">FN</abbrev> 84 group, but differing in an arm addition or a pericentric inversion. To determine which of these changes actually occurred and to quantify them, chromosome banding is required to identify regions of intra- and interchromosomal homology. Based on G-banded karyotypes from the type localities of the three nominal species of the Corrientes group, as well as the more widespread karyotype of the Iberá lineage (<abbrev xlink:title="analysis of diploid" id="ABBRID0EAIAG">2n</abbrev> = 42, <abbrev xlink:title="fundamental numbers" id="ABBRID0EEIAG">FN</abbrev> = 76), we classified and quantified the types of rearrangements involved between each pair of karyotypes: Robertsonian (<abbrev xlink:title="Robertsonian" id="ABBRID0EIIAG">Rb</abbrev>) translocations, pericentric inversions, and chromosomal arms lacking defined homology or absent. These latter categories (arm acquisition and loss) are interpreted as arising from multiple microrearrangements that alter linear DNA sequences and disrupt chromosome homologies, thus indicating major divergence. However, it is important to note that all three pairwise comparisons involving <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="dorbignyi">dorbignyi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> showed a high proportion of non-homologous chromosomal arms, likely due to the small size of many of its chromosomes, which hampers G-band-based homology assessment. When this potential artifact is disregarded, the most frequent rearrangements are <abbrev xlink:title="Robertsonian" id="ABBRID0EXIAG">Rb</abbrev> translocations which alter the <abbrev xlink:title="analysis of diploid" id="ABBRID0E2IAG">2n</abbrev>, and inversions which modify the <abbrev xlink:title="fundamental numbers" id="ABBRID0E6IAG">FN</abbrev>. In some cases, rearrangements are superimposed; for example, a pericentric inversion may occur in a chromosomal arm involved in an <abbrev xlink:title="Robertsonian" id="ABBRID0EDJAG">Rb</abbrev> translocation. Additionally, karyotypic formulas that suggested simple <abbrev xlink:title="Robertsonian" id="ABBRID0EHJAG">Rb</abbrev> changes were shown by G-banding to involve other important chromosome differences.</p>
        <fig id="F3">
          <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/vz.76.e173627.figure3</object-id>
          <object-id content-type="arpha">8E577D2E-CFD2-59E6-80EB-BA46E9B1F947</object-id>
          <label>Figure 3.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Summary of karyotypic diversity in the Corrientes group. <bold>A</bold> Relationship between diploid number (<abbrev xlink:title="analysis of diploid" id="ABBRID0ETJAG">2n</abbrev>) and fundamental number (<abbrev xlink:title="fundamental numbers" id="ABBRID0EXJAG">FN</abbrev>). <bold>B</bold> Stacked bar chart showing structural chromosomal rearrangements among <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> taxa based on G-banding patterns (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Ortells 1995</xref>). Bar height represents the total number of chromosomal differences, partitioned by rearrangement type: lack of homology of chromosomal arms (LH), Robertsonian changes without monobrachial homology (RC no-MBH), Robertsonian changes with monobrachial homology (RC MBH*), pericentric inversions (PI), and arm duplications (AD). (<bold>C</bold>) Karyotypes of the three recognized nominal species plus Iberá (modified from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Caraballo et al. 2015</xref>). Sex-chromosome pairs are shown separately; the sex pair corresponding to the metaphase on which each karyogram is based is boxed. Arrow widths are proportional to the number of changes between pairs of G-banded karyotypes, as shown in (<bold>B</bold>).</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="vertebrate-zoology-76-317-g003.jpg" id="oo_1660555.jpg">
            <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1660555</uri>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
        <p>When comparing the G-banded karyotypes of the nominal species and the Iberá lineage (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3B, C</xref>), <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="dorbignyi">dorbignyi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and Iberá are the most differentiated as expected given their extreme karyotypes, differing by 20 chromosomal arms without defined homology, 12 <abbrev xlink:title="Robertsonian" id="ABBRID0EDLAG">Rb</abbrev> translocations (one with monobrachial homology), and six pericentric inversions. The chromosome complement most similar to Iberá—based on the lowest number of inferred pairwise chromosomal rearrangements—is that of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="roigi">roigi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. Nevertheless, these karyomorphs are still separated by at least one chromosomal arm without homology, four <abbrev xlink:title="Robertsonian" id="ABBRID0ESLAG">Rb</abbrev> translocations (two with monobrachial homologies), and one pericentric inversion involving an <abbrev xlink:title="Robertsonian" id="ABBRID0EWLAG">Rb</abbrev> chromosome. In contrast, the Iberá lineage and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="perrensi">perrensi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> differ by four chromosomal arms without defined homology, four <abbrev xlink:title="Robertsonian" id="ABBRID0EFMAG">Rb</abbrev> translocations (two with monobrachial homologies), and one pericentric inversion affecting an <abbrev xlink:title="Robertsonian" id="ABBRID0EJMAG">Rb</abbrev> chromosome. Finally, the differences between the nominal species, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="perrensi">perrensi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="roigi">roigi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, include three chromosomal arms without homology, four <abbrev xlink:title="Robertsonian" id="ABBRID0EDNAG">Rb</abbrev> translocations (two with monobrachial homologies), and one pericentric inversion.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Phylogenetic analysis" id="SECID0EHNAG">
        <title>Phylogenetic analysis</title>
        <p>The phylogenetic analysis corroborates the relationships previously reported for the Corrientes group (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Caraballo et al. 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">2016</xref>) (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">4</xref>). Briefly, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="roigi">roigi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="dorbignyi">dorbignyi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> are monophyletic, whereas <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="perrensi">perrensi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> comprises two distinct haplogroups, one closely related to Sarandicito, and the other exhibiting paraphyly relative to haplotypes from Santa Rosa and a new lineage proposed herein, based on SSR clustering called Manantiales (see Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref>). The Iberá populations are monophyletic except for one locality (Curuzú Laurel), while the Manantiales lineage is split into two different clades, one related to <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="roigi">roigi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and the other to Santa Rosa. Notably, Loma Alta contains haplotypes from both clades. The use of three mitochondrial markers provides a more precise age estimate for the Corrientes group, ranging between 330,000 and 530,000 years before present (median: 420,000 ybp).</p>
        <fig id="F4">
          <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/vz.76.e173627.figure4</object-id>
          <object-id content-type="arpha">D3175DB6-6A7D-529C-B9B3-A2EA421B6644</object-id>
          <label>Figure 4.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Phylogenetic relationships and divergence times (in million years) of species and lineages of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> from the Corrientes group based on three mitochondrial loci (cyt <italic>b</italic>, <abbrev xlink:title="cytochrome oxidase I" id="ABBRID0EYPAG">COI</abbrev>, and control region). Colors indicate the membership of localities in different lineages/species: <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="roigi">roigi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (dark green), <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="dorbignyi">dorbignyi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (blue), <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="perrensi">perrensi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (red), Iberá (purple), Sarandicito (orange), Santa Rosa (gray), and Manantiales (light green). Samples from Médanos correspond to the outgroup <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="pearsoni">pearsoni</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>.</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="vertebrate-zoology-76-317-g004.jpg" id="oo_1660556.jpg">
            <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1660556</uri>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Coalescent-based delimitation analysis" id="SECID0EKRAG">
        <title>Coalescent-based delimitation analysis</title>
        <p>The coalescent-based delimitation analysis using bPTP indicates that the posterior credible interval for the number of species in the dataset ranges from 13 to 33, with an average estimate across all <abbrev xlink:title="Markov Chain Monte Carlo" id="ABBRID0EQRAG">MCMC</abbrev> samples of ~23 species (Fig. S1).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Haplotype Network" id="SECID0EYRAG">
        <title>Haplotype Network</title>
        <p>The networks obtained from each locus analyzed separately (File S2) are broadly congruent with the network based on the concatenated dataset (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5</xref>). As expected, the least resolved network corresponds to <abbrev xlink:title="control region" id="ABBRID0ECSAG">CR</abbrev>, not only because it is a non-coding region but also because it is the shortest fragment (406 bp) and, therefore, provides less information and lower resolving power. Because these loci are linked, their combined use maximizes the available information; accordingly, the most appropriate approach is to include all loci in a single network inference. The inferred <abbrev xlink:title="mitochondrial" id="ABBRID0EGSAG">mtDNA</abbrev> haplotype network is coherent with the Bayesian phylogenetic tree (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5</xref>). One remarkable aspect is that Sarandicito is distantly related to its sister group, one of the two clades of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="perrensi">perrensi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. It differs in 30 substitutions from the closest haplotype of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="perrensi">perrensi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, as well as from that of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="dorbignyi">dorbignyi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, and 32 from the closest haplotype of the Iberá populations (and 37 from the diverging haplotype found in Curuzú Laurel). In contrast, the two haplotypes found in Santa Rosa differ by only 3 and 4 substitutions from the closest haplotypes of the Manantiales lineage and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="perrensi">perrensi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, respectively. It is interesting to note that <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="roigi">roigi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> is separated by 7–8 substitutions from the closest haplotypes of the Manantiales lineage. These haplotypes correspond to the localities Manantiales, Loma Alta, and Pago Alegre, and differ in at least 12 substitutions from the closest <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="perrensi">perrensi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> haplotype. The presence of two non-related haplotypes in the Manantiales lineage will be further discussed.</p>
        <fig id="F5">
          <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/vz.76.e173627.figure5</object-id>
          <object-id content-type="arpha">1A70CF01-BFD2-57A6-A0BC-500BF1B7693B</object-id>
          <label>Figure 5.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Median joining network inferred from partial sequences of three mitochondrial loci (cyt <italic>b</italic>, <abbrev xlink:title="cytochrome oxidase I" id="ABBRID0EYUAG">COI</abbrev>, and D-loop). Substitutions are indicated by hatch marks, while hypothetical ancestral haplotypes are represented by black circles. The size of colored circles denotes the number of identical sequences. Dashed outlines reflect possible biological processes underlying the incongruence between different lines of evidence. Colors indicate the membership of haplotypes in different lineages/species: <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="roigi">roigi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (dark green), <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="dorbignyi">dorbignyi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (blue), <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="perrensi">perrensi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (red), Iberá (purple), Sarandicito (orange), Santa Rosa (gray), and Manantiales (light green).</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="vertebrate-zoology-76-317-g005.jpg" id="oo_1660557.jpg">
            <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1660557</uri>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
        <p>The network also confirms the presence of two <abbrev xlink:title="mitochondrial" id="ABBRID0EBWAG">mtDNA</abbrev> lineages within Iberá (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5</xref>), both of which are significantly differentiated from other lineages of the Corrientes group. One of these lineages includes all Iberá localities except Curuzú Laurel. This main group differs by at least 14 substitutions from any other lineage. The branch leading to the haplotypes found in Curuzú Laurel has 14 mutational steps, indicating that it is highly divergent from any other lineage.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Genetic distances" id="SECID0EJWAG">
        <title>Genetic distances</title>
        <p>The genetic distance values obtained when comparing individuals from different populations and lineages within the Corrientes group fall within a range that overlaps with both intra- and interspecific distances at the genus level (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">6A</xref>). This is also confirmed when analyzing only sequences from the <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys"/><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">torquatus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> species group, to which the Corrientes group belongs (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6">6B</xref>). In both datasets, the barcode genetic gap test revealed that there are no significant differences between intra- and interspecific distances. Taken together, these results suggest that most of the variation in Corrientes probably pertains to the infraspecific level, but there might also be some degree of species-level differentiation.</p>
        <fig id="F6">
          <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/vz.76.e173627.figure6</object-id>
          <object-id content-type="arpha">792D8C93-78B9-537B-96B2-BA84E7E7C664</object-id>
          <label>Figure 6.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Distribution of genetic distances among <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<bold>A</bold>) and among the <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys"/><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">torquatus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> group (<bold>B</bold>). Three types of uncorrected p-distances (cyt <italic>b</italic>) were computed: intraspecific distances (orange), interspecific distances (purple), and distances among the Corrientes group as a third test category (cyan). The inset in panel A shows a close-up of the distance values for the <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys"/><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">torquatus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> group. For better visualization, the histogram bin size was adjusted.</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="vertebrate-zoology-76-317-g006.jpg" id="oo_1660558.jpg">
            <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1660558</uri>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
        <p>The intralineage distances are quite low, indicating the genetic closeness of their members, ranging from 0 to 0.87% (Table S3). As expected, the highest values are found in lineages that do not form monophyletic groups in the phylogenetic tree (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">4</xref>), such as <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="perrensi">perrensi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, Iberá, and, to a lesser extent, Manantiales, which are composed of unrelated haplotypes. It is interesting to note that intralineage distances become more similar to each other when divided by the number of localities, suggesting a potential sampling bias influencing these values (Table S3).</p>
        <p>The interlineage distances are more disparate (Table S4). The genetic distances between members of the Corrientes group and its sister group, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="pearsoni">pearsoni</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, are very similar, ranging between 2.0–2.2%. However, there are important differences between lineages within the Corrientes group. The most differentiated lineage is Sarandicito, with distances of 1.4–1.6% compared to any other lineage. In most of the remaining cases, distance values are around 1% except for Manantiales, which shows 0.5% divergence from both Santa Rosa and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="roigi">roigi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Qualitative morphology" id="SECID0E3ZAG">
        <title>Qualitative morphology</title>
        <p>Almost the entire sample of studied specimens shares the same skull anatomy, without clear variations in the character states among the craniodental traits defined by De Santi et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">2020</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">2021</xref>). We did not find major differences between our scoring of the skull characters and that of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">De Santi et al. (2021)</xref> for <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="dorbignyi">dorbignyi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="perrensi">perrensi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, and the samples from Iberá. However, some minor but constant morphological differences were found between <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="roigi">roigi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and the other lineages, including more proodont upper incisors, shorter rostra, shorter premaxillae that end at the same level of the nasals, and larger paraoccipital processes (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">7</xref>).</p>
        <fig id="F7">
          <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/vz.76.e173627.figure7</object-id>
          <object-id content-type="arpha">FC9B761D-079D-5A7D-9657-A2192C4737EE</object-id>
          <label>Figure 7.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Dorsal (<bold>A</bold>–<bold>D</bold>) and ventral (<bold>E</bold>–<bold>H</bold>) views of the skulls of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="perrensi">perrensi</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subspecies" reg="dorbignyi">dorbignyi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<bold>A</bold>, <bold>E</bold>; <abbrev xlink:title="Fundación de Historia Natural “Félix de Azara”" id="ABBRID0EU3AG">CFA-MA</abbrev>-11244), <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="perrensi">perrensi</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subspecies" reg="perrensi">perrensi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<bold>B, F</bold>; <abbrev xlink:title="Fundación de Historia Natural “Félix de Azara”" id="ABBRID0EJ4AG">CFA-MA</abbrev>-12082), <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="roigi">roigi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<bold>C, G</bold>; <abbrev xlink:title="Fundación de Historia Natural “Félix de Azara”" id="ABBRID0E14AG">CFA-MA</abbrev>-12175), and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="perrensi">perrensi</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subspecies" reg="iberaensis">iberaensis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic><bold>subsp. nov</bold>. (<bold>D</bold>, <bold>H</bold>; <abbrev xlink:title="Fundación de Historia Natural “Félix de Azara”" id="ABBRID0ET5AG">CFA-MA</abbrev>-12685). Scale = 5 mm.</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="vertebrate-zoology-76-317-g007.jpg" id="oo_1660559.jpg">
            <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1660559</uri>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
        <p>Those samples corresponding to <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="dorbignyi">dorbignyi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="perrensi">perrensi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, and Iberá have medium-sized to large, robust skulls, not flattened in lateral profile; nasals with nearly straight and posteriorly convergent outer borders; broad and quadrate interorbital regions, with moderate to well-developed postorbital processes; the width across the auditory meatus slightly narrower than the zygomatic breadth; proportionally large and wide incisive foramina; medium-sized and pyriform auditory bullae; and mesopterygoid fossae extending to the level of M2 (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">7</xref>).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Quantitative morphology" id="SECID0EV6AG">
        <title>Quantitative morphology</title>
        <p>Descriptive statistics are provided in Table S5. The first two axes of the <abbrev xlink:title="principal component analysis" id="ABBRID0E66AG">PCA</abbrev> explained 84.5% of the total variance (PC1 = 78.8%, PC2 = 5.7%, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">8</xref>; Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">2</xref>). The four lineages studied here exhibited a moderate to large overlap in both components. A minor separation can be detected along PC1, being males positioned towards positive values, indicating a tendency for a larger size. In turn, females were positioned toward negative values, depicting a smaller overall size.</p>
        <fig id="F8">
          <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/vz.76.e173627.figure8</object-id>
          <object-id content-type="arpha">F30AB528-441F-516C-945B-40D4CC90D3F2</object-id>
          <label>Figure 8.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Individual scores of adult specimens of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> from Corrientes (n = 74) for: (A) principal components 1 and 2; (B) canonical variates 1 and 2, extracted from four-group discriminant function analysis. Colors are as follows: blue, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="perrensi">perrensi</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subspecies" reg="dorbignyi">dorbignyi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>; red, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="perrensi">perrensi</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subspecies" reg="perrensi">perrensi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>; green, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="roigi">roigi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>; violet, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="perrensi">perrensi</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subspecies" reg="iberaensis">iberaensis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic><bold>subsp. nov</bold>. (dots correspond to females, while squares correspond to males).</p>
          </caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="vertebrate-zoology-76-317-g008.jpg" id="oo_1660560.jpg">
            <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1660560</uri>
          </graphic>
        </fig>
        <table-wrap id="T2" position="float" orientation="portrait">
          <label>Table 2.</label>
          <caption>
            <p>Results of principal components analysis (columns 1 and 2) and discriminant function analysis (columns 3 and 4) carried out on adult individuals (n = 74) of four lineages of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> from Corrientes. See “Materials and methods” for an explanation of abbreviations.</p>
          </caption>
          <table>
            <tbody>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1"/>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>PC 1</bold>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>PC 2</bold>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>CV1</bold>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <bold>CV2</bold>
                </td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <abbrev xlink:title="total length of the skull" id="ABBRID0EHEBG">TLS</abbrev>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.2428</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–0.0893</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.0111</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–0.0004</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <abbrev xlink:title="condyle-incisive length" id="ABBRID0E3EBG">CIL</abbrev>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.2429</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–0.1044</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.0105</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.0006</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <abbrev xlink:title="nasal length" id="ABBRID0ERFBG">NL</abbrev>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.2014</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–0.2466</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.0092</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.0057</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <abbrev xlink:title="nasal width" id="ABBRID0EGGBG">NW</abbrev>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.3538</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.3377</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.0158</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.0045</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <abbrev xlink:title="rostral width" id="ABBRID0E2GBG">RW</abbrev>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.3328</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–0.0276</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.0178</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.0027</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <abbrev xlink:title="frontal length" id="ABBRID0EQHBG">FL</abbrev>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.1239</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–0.2368</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.0078</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–0.0025</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <abbrev xlink:title="interorbital constriction" id="ABBRID0EFIBG">IOC</abbrev>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.2362</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.6714</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.0127</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–0.0011</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <abbrev xlink:title="greatest zygomatic breadth" id="ABBRID0E1IBG">ZB</abbrev>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.2104</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.0483</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.0090</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–0.0002</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <abbrev xlink:title="braincase breadth" id="ABBRID0EPJBG">BB</abbrev>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.1071</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.0432</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.0046</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–0.0036</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <abbrev xlink:title="bimeatal breadth" id="ABBRID0EEKBG">BMB</abbrev>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.1866</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.1551</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.0094</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–0.0047</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <abbrev xlink:title="mastoid breadth" id="ABBRID0EZKBG">MB</abbrev>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.1924</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.1497</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.0080</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–0.0062</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <abbrev xlink:title="infraorbital foramen length" id="ABBRID0EOLBG">IFL</abbrev>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.2762</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.0885</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.0115</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.0033</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <abbrev xlink:title="diastema length" id="ABBRID0EDMBG">DL</abbrev>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.2913</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–0.2971</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.0130</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.0011</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <abbrev xlink:title="palatal length" id="ABBRID0EYMBG">PL</abbrev>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.2808</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–0.2143</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.0130</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–0.0012</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <abbrev xlink:title="upper incisors width" id="ABBRID0ENNBG">UIW</abbrev>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.3419</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–0.2602</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.0154</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.0034</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <abbrev xlink:title="upper toothrow length" id="ABBRID0ECOBG">UTL</abbrev>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.1691</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–0.1412</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.0089</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.0016</td>
              </tr>
              <tr>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">
                  <abbrev xlink:title="upper fourth premolar length" id="ABBRID0EXOBG">PM4L</abbrev>
                </td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.1458</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.1355</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">0.0052</td>
                <td rowspan="1" colspan="1">–0.0010</td>
              </tr>
            </tbody>
          </table>
        </table-wrap>
        <p>The <abbrev xlink:title="discriminant function analysis" id="ABBRID0EJPBG">DFA</abbrev> analysis reproduced the results shown by the <abbrev xlink:title="principal component analysis" id="ABBRID0ENPBG">PCA</abbrev>, although depicting <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="roigi">roigi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> as the most distinctive nominal form and a moderate to large degree of overlap among <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="dorbignyi">dorbignyi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="perrensi">perrensi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, and the samples from Iberá (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8">8</xref>; Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2">2</xref>). The distinction of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="roigi">roigi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> occurred both along the first axis (37.6% of the total variance) as well as the second (23.9%), while the other three lineages slightly differed along the first axis.</p>
        <p>The <abbrev xlink:title="Multivariate analysis of variance" id="ABBRID0EHRBG">MANOVA</abbrev> showed an overall significant intergroup variation (λ = 0.0076, df = 119, 336, P &lt; 0.001). However, posterior pairwise comparisons using Bonferroni-corrected P values showed that all groups do not differ significantly from each other. This pattern is consistent with limited morphological differentiation among recently diverged lineages and is expected for taxa recognized at the subspecific level.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="Discussion" id="SECID0ELRBG">
      <title>Discussion</title>
      <p>From a theoretical point of view, species and independent lineage delimitation involves testable hypotheses, which are subsequently evaluated by introducing additional characters, populations, individuals, and analytical methods. This iterative process can ultimately refine and redefine the classification of a given focal taxon. Integrative taxonomy is based on two complementary criteria: integration by congruence and by cumulation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B60">Padial and De La Riva 2009</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B61">Padial et al. 2010</xref>). The first criterion evaluates lineage divergence at the population level and proposes that a lineage should be recognized as a species when it is consistently supported by multiple unlinked genetic loci. Such concordant evidence indicates isolation from other lineages, because agreement among the coalescent histories of unlinked markers is expected only when lineages have been effectively isolated for a long period of time. In contrast, the “integration by cumulation” criterion assumes that divergences in any organismal attribute that constitute taxonomic characters can provide evidence for the existence of a species. From the synthesis of both criteria emanates the concept that although the presence of a single property could evidence lineage separation, a highly corroborated hypothesis will require multiple lines of evidence (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">de Queiroz 2007</xref>). In this study, we have three main sources of information: molecular genetics (nuclear SSR and <abbrev xlink:title="mitochondrial" id="ABBRID0E4RBG">mtDNA</abbrev>), cytogenetics, and morphology. The first two can be useful for establishing lineage independence hypotheses, and the latter may serve to identify differences arising from adaptive processes; thus all converging as evidence indicative of species-level divergence.</p>
      <p>From an operational standpoint, accurately defining species and independent lineages is essential for preserving biodiversity. Misestimating the number of species or subspecies can negatively impact conservation and management initiatives (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B80">Zachos et al. 2013</xref> and references therein). The Mburucuyá National Park and the Iberá Provincial Reserve (encompassing areas of 176 km² and 13,000 km², respectively) are home to some tuco-tucos populations of the Corrientes group. Species and lineage delimitation are crucial for establishing which part of the group diversity is protected and which populations require conservation.</p>
      <p>The first goal of this study was to identify independently evolving lineages within the <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Corrientes group, using an integrative approach that considers all available sources of evidence. We will focus in this section on non-morphological characters and discuss the taxonomic implications of adding morphology in the next section. We rely on three sources of information that may be partially or fully congruent in defining independent evolutionary lineages: chromosome data, mitochondrial sequences, and nuclear microsatellites. These characters are partially independent and were used to delimit species in most taxonomic groups. However, each of them presents limitations related to their tempo and modes of evolution that can make taxonomic decisions difficult in some cases.</p>
      <sec sec-type="The role of chromosomes in the delimitation of the Corrientes group" id="SECID0EQSBG">
        <title>The role of chromosomes in the delimitation of the Corrientes group</title>
        <p>Unlike many other species groups of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, the Corrientes group is characterized by remarkable chromosomal diversity, with many distinct karyotypes comparable to the total number of sampled localities. This pattern suggests that chromosomal evolution is an ongoing process in this group and that the rate of fixation is rapid, as—except for some Robertsonian rearrangements—most localities are monomorphic. The lack of allozymic (also corroborated with genetic studies, including this study) and morphological differentiation in the presence of the extensive karyotypic diversification found in these lineages made previous authors claim the Corrientes group to be a case of chromosomal speciation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">Ortells et al. 1990</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Ortells and Barrantes 1994</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Ortells 1995</xref>). However, the type and number of chromosomal changes required to cause reproductive isolation remain a matter of debate, both in <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and across mammals and other taxa (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B72">Rieseberg 2001</xref>).</p>
        <p>Chromosomal differences have been historically claimed to be barriers to gene flow, given that heterozygotes for extensively rearranged chromosome complements would produce unbalanced gametes, leading to varying degrees of hybrid sterility, or promote divergence between heteromorphic homologues via recombination suppression, which may result in negative heterotic effects (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">King 1995</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Dobigny et al. 2005</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Faria and Navarro 2010</xref>). However, some rearrangements, such as Robertsonian (<abbrev xlink:title="Robertsonian" id="ABBRID0ECUBG">Rb</abbrev>) translocations, which alter the <abbrev xlink:title="analysis of diploid" id="ABBRID0EGUBG">2n</abbrev> but not the <abbrev xlink:title="fundamental numbers" id="ABBRID0EKUBG">FN</abbrev>, do not necessarily constitute reproductive barriers, particularly if they are in low numbers (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Lanzone et al. 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Dobigny et al. 2005</xref>). This previously led to a first delimitation of the Corrientes group, whereby populations characterized by different <abbrev xlink:title="fundamental numbers" id="ABBRID0E1UBG">FN</abbrev> were considered members of independent lineages (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Caraballo and Rossi 2017</xref>). This is because <abbrev xlink:title="fundamental numbers" id="ABBRID0ECVBG">FN</abbrev>-altering rearrangements, such as inversions and tandem fusions, can produce unbalanced gametes in hybrids (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">King 1995</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Dobigny et al. 2017</xref>); another possible source of <abbrev xlink:title="fundamental numbers" id="ABBRID0EOVBG">FN</abbrev> changes is whole-arm heterochromatin additions and deletions, but these types of modifications were detected in low frequency within the group (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Argüelles et al. 2001</xref>). On the contrary, individuals with the same <abbrev xlink:title="fundamental numbers" id="ABBRID0EWVBG">FN</abbrev> were considered as potentially interfertile (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Caraballo and Rossi 2017</xref>). However, heterozygotes for multiple <abbrev xlink:title="Robertsonian" id="ABBRID0E5VBG">Rb</abbrev> and, to a lesser extent, tandem fusions in natural rodent populations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Kartavtseva et al. 2021</xref>), along with viable hybrids between divergent populations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Maputla et al. 2011</xref>), show that extensively rearranged karyotypes do not necessarily act as strong barriers to gene flow. Thus, although it may be indicative of evolutionary independence, there may be some degree of gene flow between karyotypically divergent populations.</p>
        <p>The analysis of the karyotypic diversity of the Corrientes group suggests at least four (possibly five) chromosomal lineages that differ in several chromosome pairs. The most widespread <abbrev xlink:title="fundamental numbers" id="ABBRID0EMWBG">FN</abbrev> = 84, which includes <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="dorbignyi">dorbignyi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="perrensi">perrensi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, as well as Sarandicito and Manantiales, comprises a complex of <abbrev xlink:title="Robertsonian" id="ABBRID0EGXBG">Rb</abbrev> forms. At first glance, it may appear confusing that in the G-banding analysis of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="perrensi">perrensi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="dorbignyi">dorbignyi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, the total number of chromosomal changes was higher than that of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="perrensi">perrensi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="roigi">roigi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> or Iberá (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2</xref>), which have more rearranged karyotypes as revealed by the inspection of <abbrev xlink:title="analysis of diploid" id="ABBRID0E1YBG">2n</abbrev>, chromosomal morphology, and <abbrev xlink:title="fundamental numbers" id="ABBRID0E5YBG">FN</abbrev>, as well as by DAPI-banding (this study; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Caraballo et al. 2015</xref>; Buschiazzo et al. 2018). However, all comparisons involving <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="dorbignyi">dorbignyi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> include a large number of arms where homology could not be determined. Additionally, it is noteworthy that <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="dorbignyi">dorbignyi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="perrensi">perrensi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> have no computed pericentric inversions, nor chromosomal arms additions, and instead the identified rearrangements would be exclusively <abbrev xlink:title="Robertsonian" id="ABBRID0EH1BG">Rb</abbrev> fusions/fissions (again, with lower reproductive isolation outcomes). The remaining differences correspond to a lack of homology between chromosomes, which is in opposition to the DAPI-banding comparison, and could be attributable to artifactual causes that prevent accurate matching of bands, especially considering the small sized chromosomes of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="dorbignyi">dorbignyi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. Another interesting aspect is the relative similarity between the karyotypes of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="roigi">roigi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and the most frequent form found in Iberá (<abbrev xlink:title="analysis of diploid" id="ABBRID0EB2BG">2n</abbrev> = 42, <abbrev xlink:title="fundamental numbers" id="ABBRID0EF2BG">FN</abbrev> = 76) as revealed by conventional staining, G-bands, and DAPI-bands. These are the karyotypes with the lowest <abbrev xlink:title="fundamental numbers" id="ABBRID0EJ2BG">FN</abbrev> of the Corrientes group, and although a nearly complete arm homology could be established between them, there are two pericentric inversions, one of which took place in an <abbrev xlink:title="Robertsonian" id="ABBRID0EN2BG">Rb</abbrev> chromosome, which would represent a strong reproductive barrier. In fact, the inspection of DAPI-banding patterns requires that more rearrangements should have taken place between these two karyomorphs to explain their chromosomal differences (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Buschiazzo et al. 2018</xref>). The latter chromosomal lineage would be that of Santa Rosa, which depicts high <abbrev xlink:title="analysis of diploid" id="ABBRID0EV2BG">2n</abbrev> and <abbrev xlink:title="fundamental numbers" id="ABBRID0EZ2BG">FN</abbrev> = 86.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Mitochondrial clades and microsatellite clusters" id="SECID0E42BG">
        <title>Mitochondrial clades and microsatellite clusters</title>
        <p>Monophyletic groups are the cornerstone of genetic approaches for species identification. However, mitochondrial DNA can sometimes lead to inaccurate phylogenetic reconstruction due to several limitations. Since <abbrev xlink:title="mitochondrial" id="ABBRID0ED3BG">mtDNA</abbrev> is maternally inherited and does not undergo recombination, it does not provide a complete picture of a population’s genetic history (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Ballard and Whitlock 2004</xref>). Moreover, <abbrev xlink:title="mitochondrial" id="ABBRID0EL3BG">mtDNA</abbrev> is susceptible to selective sweeps and strong genetic drift, which can reduce genetic diversity and mask true evolutionary connections (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Christie and Beekman 2017</xref>). Additionally, introgression can introduce foreign <abbrev xlink:title="mitochondrial" id="ABBRID0ET3BG">mtDNA</abbrev> into a population, further complicating phylogenetic analyses (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Bágeľová Poláková et al. 2021</xref>). The rapid evolution of <abbrev xlink:title="mitochondrial" id="ABBRID0E23BG">mtDNA</abbrev> compared to nuclear DNA can also result in homoplasies—similar traits arising independently rather than from a common ancestor—leading to incorrect assumptions about species relatedness (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Galtier et al. 2006</xref>). These factors can distort phylogenetic trees and mislead our understanding of evolutionary histories. In this sense, the species delimitation inference performed in this study is based on a single mitochondrial DNA phylogeny; therefore, it reflects only maternal lineages and may be influenced by the distorting factors mentioned above. To avoid potential oversplitting or undersplitting, these results should be evaluated in combination with additional sources of data, such as nuclear markers, morphology, ecology, and geographic distribution, to provide a more robust framework for species delimitation.</p>
        <p>On the other hand, microsatellites have been widely used to estimate gene flow or isolation between populations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Mirol et al. 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Fernández et al. 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Kim and Sappington 2013</xref>). However, incorrect cluster inference of panmictic populations using SSR markers can be caused by several factors (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B66">Putman and Carbone 2014</xref>). Insufficient marker polymorphism and a small number of markers might fail to capture genetic diversity adequately. A small sample size may not represent the population’s genetic diversity accurately, leading to biased allele frequency estimates and incorrect clustering. Hidden population structure or substructure can also interfere with the assumption of random mating in panmictic populations. Additionally, genotyping errors, such as allele dropout or stutter bands, can introduce inaccuracies in the data, resulting in erroneous cluster assignments.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Lineage delimitation" id="SECID0EV4BG">
        <title>Lineage delimitation</title>
        <p>Below, we present the delineation of the different independently evolving lineages found in the Corrientes group. As we will discuss, there is some level of discordance among lines of evidence, specifically between <abbrev xlink:title="mitochondrial" id="ABBRID0E24BG">mtDNA</abbrev> phylogeny and SSR clusters. However, these incongruences are expected in groups with short divergence times, such as the Corrientes group, where processes such as hybridization followed by introgression or incomplete lineage sorting are more prone to occur (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Avise 1994</xref>).</p>
        <p><italic><tp:taxon-name>
              <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="roigi">roigi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> is likely the most distinct lineage within the Corrientes group. This species is characterized by a unique karyotype (<abbrev xlink:title="analysis of diploid" id="ABBRID0ET5BG">2n</abbrev> = 48, <abbrev xlink:title="fundamental numbers" id="ABBRID0EX5BG">FN</abbrev> = 80; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Caraballo et al. 2015</xref>), forms an exclusive SSR cluster (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Mirol et al. 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Fernández et al. 2012</xref>), and its <abbrev xlink:title="mitochondrial" id="ABBRID0EH6BG">mtDNA</abbrev> variants are monophyletic (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Caraballo and Rossi 2017</xref>; this study), which confirms its genetic distinctiveness and independent evolution.</p>
        <p><italic><tp:taxon-name>
              <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="perrensi">perrensi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> consists of populations with varying diploid numbers (50–62), but a shared <abbrev xlink:title="fundamental numbers" id="ABBRID0EAAAI">FN</abbrev> of 84. These populations are grouped into two or three SSR clusters (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Mirol et al. 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Fernández et al. 2012</xref>) and two <abbrev xlink:title="mitochondrial" id="ABBRID0EMAAI">mtDNA</abbrev> groups. Interestingly, the SSR clusters and <abbrev xlink:title="mitochondrial" id="ABBRID0EQAAI">mtDNA</abbrev> phylogeny show different patterns. At the <abbrev xlink:title="mitochondrial" id="ABBRID0EUAAI">mtDNA</abbrev> level, the northern and southern localities fall into two unrelated groups (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">4</xref>), but the SSR clusters interweave these localities (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">2</xref>; Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref>). This suggests that the populations may form a continuum of chromosomal forms, with the extremes possibly connected by intermediate karyotypes, resembling the pattern observed in ring species (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Coyne and Orr 2004</xref>). This is congruent with the high frequency of <abbrev xlink:title="Robertsonian" id="ABBRID0EIBAI">Rb</abbrev> heterozygotes in some of these populations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Giménez et al. 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Lanzone et al. 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">2007</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Caraballo et al. 2015</xref>; Buschiazzo et al. 2018). Its inclusion in two distant clades suggests deep coalescence of the mitochondrial variants found in these populations.</p>
        <p>The populations assigned to <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="dorbignyi">dorbignyi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, corresponding to the originally described northern nucleus of this species (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Contreras and Contreras 1984</xref>), contain an exclusive haplotype and form their own SSR cluster, confirming its independence from all other lineages. Its karyotype (<abbrev xlink:title="analysis of diploid" id="ABBRID0ENCAI">2n</abbrev> = 70, <abbrev xlink:title="fundamental numbers" id="ABBRID0ERCAI">FN</abbrev> = 84) is suggested to be the ancestral form of the Corrientes group, a characteristic also shared with <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="pearsoni">pearsoni</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and the population from Sarandicito (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Caraballo and Rossi 2017</xref>; Buschiazzo et al. 2022). Interestingly, a recent study employing a high-throughput genomic approach that includes <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="dorbignyi">dorbignyi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and a topotype of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="perrensi">perrensi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> reveals that their genomic distances fall within the range of intraspecific variation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B78">Tomasco et al. 2024</xref>), thus corroborating the low level of divergence between these nominal taxa.</p>
        <p>The individuals from Sarandicito share a similar karyotype with <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="dorbignyi">dorbignyi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, yet they exhibit a distinct haplotype and possess a unique SSR cluster. Sarandicito stands out as the most divergent lineage based on <abbrev xlink:title="mitochondrial" id="ABBRID0ELEAI">mtDNA</abbrev> distances (Table S4), a pattern also evident in the haplotype network (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5</xref>). Its interlineage distances are closer to interspecific values than to any other comparisons in the Corrientes group. This combination of distinctiveness and substantial differentiation establishes Sarandicito as a well-delineated independent lineage, with some degree of affinity to <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="perrensi">perrensi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, as revealed by the hierarchical SSR clustering and <abbrev xlink:title="mitochondrial" id="ABBRID0ECFAI">mtDNA</abbrev> phylogeny. Further studies using a genomic approach at the assemblage level will help to identify additional chromosome modifications which remain undetectable with classical cytogenetic banding techniques.</p>
        <p>The Iberá lineage represents a distinct, independent evolutionary path within the Corrientes group. Its most notable characteristic is a quite derived karyotype with the lowest <abbrev xlink:title="analysis of diploid" id="ABBRID0EIFAI">2n</abbrev> and <abbrev xlink:title="fundamental numbers" id="ABBRID0EMFAI">FN</abbrev> values observed in Corrientes (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3</xref>). Similar to <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="perrensi">perrensi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, karyomorphs within the Iberá lineage exhibit slight differences in <abbrev xlink:title="analysis of diploid" id="ABBRID0E6FAI">2n</abbrev>, attributed to <abbrev xlink:title="Robertsonian" id="ABBRID0EDGAI">Rb</abbrev> translocations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Caraballo et al. 2015</xref>; Buschiazzo et al. 2018), the most common rearrangement among rodents (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B64">Patton and Sherwood 1983</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Dobigny et al. 2005</xref>). The chromosome modification accounting for <abbrev xlink:title="fundamental numbers" id="ABBRID0ETGAI">FN</abbrev> differences among Iberá lineage localities is proposed to be a tandem fusion involving the smallest chromosome pair (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Caraballo et al. 2015</xref>). Although this type of rearrangement potentially promotes reproductive isolation, the chromosome abnormalities more frequently tolerated, producing viable individuals, are those involving the smallest elements (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Labaroni et al. 2023</xref>). This is more in line with the evidence obtained from SSR and <abbrev xlink:title="mitochondrial" id="ABBRID0E6GAI">mtDNA</abbrev> that indicates that these populations are interconnected, functioning as a single evolutionary entity. Thus, there is no conclusive evidence to subdivide the Iberá lineage into two sublineages. Nevertheless, some discordances warrant biological interpretation. All Iberá lineage populations are monophyletic except for one locality: Curuzú Laurel. Remarkably, this population shares the same karyotype as the majority of Iberá populations (<abbrev xlink:title="analysis of diploid" id="ABBRID0EDHAI">2n</abbrev> = 42, <abbrev xlink:title="fundamental numbers" id="ABBRID0EHHAI">FN</abbrev> = 76) and belongs to exclusive Iberá SSR clusters (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Mirol et al. 2010</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Fernández et al. 2012</xref>). In the <abbrev xlink:title="mitochondrial" id="ABBRID0ETHAI">mtDNA</abbrev>-based phylogenetic analysis, Curuzú Laurel forms part of a primary polytomy encompassing all northern Correntinean populations. This pattern could arise from hybridization with a distantly related lineage or retention of an ancestral variant (deep coalescence). If hybridization led to the origin of this haplotype, there should be additional data supporting Curuzú Laurel’s clustering with another lineage of the Corrientes group. Our study employs a network approach, revealing that Curuzú Laurel’s haplotype corresponds to a distinct mitochondrial lineage, not closely related to any other lineage, likely representing an ancient haplotype potentially fixed through genetic drift.</p>
        <p>The lineage of Manantiales also possesses an exclusive SSR cluster, which is hierarchically clustered with <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="roigi">roigi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref>), indicating its independence from <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="perrensi">perrensi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, previously assigned by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Caraballo and Rossi (2017)</xref>. Further, <abbrev xlink:title="mitochondrial" id="ABBRID0EXIAI">mtDNA</abbrev> network analysis partially supports the connection with <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="roigi">roigi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, where three of its localities—Loma Alta, Pago Alegre, and Manantiales—share haplotypes more closely related to this species than to any other lineage (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5</xref>). However, another haplotype in Loma Alta is noteworthy. It is shared with Mburucuyá, unrelated to Manantiales (locality), closely related to Santa Rosa, and secondarily to <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="perrensi">perrensi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Figs <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4">4</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5</xref>). The presence of these two unrelated haplotypes in Loma Alta was confirmed by analyzing an additional 10 individuals, resulting in a 1:1 ratio, demonstrating this polymorphism. This haplotype was probably introduced through introgression from Santa Rosa or the nearby Saladas locality of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="perrensi">perrensi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Figs <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5</xref>). Although karyotypic data for the Manantiales lineage are incomplete, available evidence suggests a differentiated chromosomal complement with an ancestral <abbrev xlink:title="fundamental numbers" id="ABBRID0EQKAI">FN</abbrev> = 84 (Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1">1</xref>).</p>
        <p>The final independent lineage identified within the Corrientes group is Santa Rosa, which presents several inconsistencies. It has a unique <abbrev xlink:title="fundamental numbers" id="ABBRID0E1KAI">FN</abbrev> of 86 and a polymorphic derived karyotype with a high chromosome number (<abbrev xlink:title="analysis of diploid" id="ABBRID0E5KAI">2n</abbrev> = 65–66) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Giménez et al. 2002</xref>; Buschiazzo et al. 2018). At the <abbrev xlink:title="mitochondrial" id="ABBRID0EGLAI">mtDNA</abbrev> level, interlineage distances are comparable to other comparisons within the Corrientes group, but genetic distances with Loma Alta and Mburucuyá are notably low. Microsatellite analyses are conflicting: in one study, Santa Rosa clustered with members of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="perrensi">perrensi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Mirol et al. 2010</xref>), while in another, it grouped with San Miguel, a member of the Iberá lineage (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Fernández et al. 2012</xref>). This raises the question of whether Santa Rosa serves as a point of contact between these two lineages. Regardless, it cannot be unambiguously assigned to any previously identified lineage, suggesting it may represent a distinct, independent lineage.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="The evolutionary history of the Corrientes group" id="SECID0E4LAI">
        <title>The evolutionary history of the Corrientes group</title>
        <p>The Corrientes group traces its origins to a period between 530,000 and 330,000 years ago, after diverging from its sister group, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="pearsoni">pearsoni</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, and expanding its range from south to north (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Caraballo and Rossi 2018</xref>; our Supplementary Online Material SOM1). The ancestor of the Corrientes group exhibited a diploid number of 70 chromosomes and a fundamental number of 84, characteristics shared with certain forms found in both the Corrientes group and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="pearsoni">pearsoni</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Buschiazzo et al. 2022</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Caraballo 2023</xref>). During the diversification of the Corrientes group, two primary <abbrev xlink:title="mitochondrial" id="ABBRID0EFNAI">mtDNA</abbrev> lineages emerged. The southern lineage encompasses the austral populations of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="perrensi">perrensi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and Sarandicito, all of which retained the ancestral <abbrev xlink:title="fundamental numbers" id="ABBRID0EUNAI">FN</abbrev> of 84. Sarandicito also retained the ancestral <abbrev xlink:title="analysis of diploid" id="ABBRID0EYNAI">2n</abbrev> = 70 and was isolated from the rest of the Corrientes group, with no subsequent gene flow. In contrast, the northern lineage underwent extensive chromosomal diversification. Although some populations maintained the ancestral <abbrev xlink:title="fundamental numbers" id="ABBRID0E3NAI">FN</abbrev> of 84—with <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="dorbignyi">dorbignyi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> retaining the relictual <abbrev xlink:title="analysis of diploid" id="ABBRID0ELOAI">2n</abbrev> = 70—certain populations of the southern and northern <abbrev xlink:title="mitochondrial" id="ABBRID0EPOAI">mtDNA</abbrev> lineages, sharing karyotypic compatibility, have remained genetically connected, constituting <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="perrensi">perrensi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. However, other populations remained isolated, giving rise to chromosomally divergent lineages, likely facilitated by habitat instability.</p>
        <p>During the Pliocene, the Paraná River flowed into the Uruguay River, situated to the east of the Corrientes Province. More recently, during the Late Pleistocene and the Holocene—particularly between 18,000 and 6000 years ago—the Paraná River occupied multiple overlapping channels that initially flowed from northeast to southwest across Corrientes province, before shifting westward and then northward toward the Paraguay River basin (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B65">Popolizio 1977</xref>). This movement was followed by a dry period, succeeded by a humid one. Due to the gentle slope to the west of the Ituzaingó–La Paz fault, excess water from this last humid period accumulated in a large depression, giving rise to several shallow lakes, marshes, channels, and small rivers, ultimately forming the Iberá wetland around 3000 years ago (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Iriondo 1991</xref>). Because the Correntinean populations of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> broadly predate these events, the current distribution likely reflects remnants of past extinctions and/or displacements associated with climatic and hydrological changes.</p>
        <p>While some northern lineages remained disconnected for a sufficient period to develop evolutionary independence, secondary contact between certain lineages has taken place, as detected through SSR and <abbrev xlink:title="mitochondrial" id="ABBRID0ERPAI">mtDNA</abbrev> analyses. Examples of such secondary interactions include Santa Rosa and Iberá, Manantiales and Santa Rosa, and among distinct <abbrev xlink:title="mitochondrial" id="ABBRID0EVPAI">mtDNA</abbrev> lineages of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="perrensi">perrensi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (Figs <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">1</xref>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5">5</xref>). Notably, all interlineage genetic exchanges took place in the same geographical region—a central part of the distribution of all known populations—while other demes outside this area remained isolated. This suggests this is a highly unstable zone where colonizations, extinctions, and reconnections likely occurred iteratively. <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="dorbignyi">dorbignyi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="roigi">roigi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> likely remained isolated due not exclusively to ecological reasons, but most probably as a result of substantial karyotypic divergence from neighboring populations. Therefore, these populations may function as containment belts, limiting genetic exchange with other potentially interbreeding lineages.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="Evolutionary and Taxonomic Implications" id="SECID0ECRAI">
        <title>Evolutionary and Taxonomic Implications</title>
        <p>If arriving at a universal species concept is difficult —even impossible —achieving universal agreement on infraspecific divisions is likely even more challenging. However, subspecies, races, and varieties are often considered real entities in nature, and recognized as biologically meaningful groups (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B70">Reydon and Kunz 2019</xref>). Given that infraspecific groups are, by definition, subdivisions of species, their status depends entirely on the status of their respective species.</p>
        <p>In mammals, subspecies recognition is controversial: some authors deny the existence of this taxonomic category as a real entity and claim that it should not be used (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Burbrink et al. 2022</xref>). Others, in a typological approach, highlight the importance of heritable phenotypic differentiation to determine subspecies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B63">Patten 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Molinari 2023</xref>). However, the distinction between genetically and environmentally determined character variability (i.e., phenotypic plasticity) is usually difficult to establish. Other approaches focus on detecting incompletely separated lineages with semi-independent evolution (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">de Queiroz 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B71">Reydon and Kunz 2021</xref>), which aligns more closely with the species concepts currently used (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B71">Reydon and Kunz 2021</xref>). The case of the Corrientes group is an example of chromosomal radiation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Kavalco and Pasa 2023</xref>). The closest population groups are differentiated by several chromosomal rearrangements, which are expected to generate some degree of hybrid sterility proportional to the cytogenetic divergence (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">King 1995</xref>). In addition, contact between them is restricted by their patchy distribution and the solitary, subterranean lifestyle characteristic of the genus <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B69">Reig et al. 1990</xref>). Among these populations, morphological differentiation is low, as expected due to the constraints imposed by the subterranean environment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B50">Lessa 1990</xref>). The semi-independence of the lineages proposed in this work is supported by the integration of different genetic data (mitochondrial and nuclear). Accordingly, we propose a new taxonomic arrangement for the Corrientes group that is more compatible with the data obtained to date. However, due to the deep chromosomal divergence between populations and the low frequency of heterozygotes (involving only up to two pairs), other independent or semi-independent lineages may require additional taxonomic recognition (e.g., Sarandicito, Santa Rosa).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec sec-type="New taxonomic arrangement" id="SECID0E4SAI">
        <title>New taxonomic arrangement</title>
        <p>The integration of different lines of genetic evidence (i.e., SSR, <abbrev xlink:title="mitochondrial" id="ABBRID0EDTAI">mtDNA</abbrev>, cytogenetics, genomic data) plus qualitative and quantitative morphological analyses, supports the existence of at least four different taxa within populations currently referred to as the Corrientes group. These four groups are here regarded as two species, one of them with three subspecies. We therefore propose that <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="perrensi">perrensi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="roigi">roigi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> are sufficiently distinctive to be considered full species, while <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="dorbignyi">dorbignyi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> plus an unnamed subspecies from Iberá, which is described below, are part of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="perrensi">perrensi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>.</p>
        <p>Additional support for this taxonomic arrangement comes from a recent study employing a high-throughput genomic approach, which found that the genomic distances between <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="dorbignyi">dorbignyi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and a topotype of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="perrensi">perrensi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> fall within the range typically observed for intraspecific comparisons (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B78">Tomasco et al. 2024</xref>). This indicated that our taxonomic decision to incorporate part of the diversity displayed by the Corrientes group at the subspecies level into the species category is more in line with the data obtained to date (mitochondrial and nuclear genomes, plus morphological data). Despite some populations showing exclusive haplotypes, unique chromosome complements, and/or forming their own SSR clusters, these genetic markers can evolve fast and be neutral enough not to establish species boundaries.</p>
        <p>As was stated above, the lineage from Iberá has no available name, so we describe and diagnose it as follows:</p>
        <tp:taxon-treatment>
          <tp:treatment-meta>
            <kwd-group>
              <label>Taxon classification</label>
              <kwd>
                <named-content content-type="kingdom">Animalia</named-content>
              </kwd>
              <kwd>
                <named-content content-type="order">Rodentia</named-content>
              </kwd>
              <kwd>
                <named-content content-type="family">Ctenomyidae</named-content>
              </kwd>
            </kwd-group>
          </tp:treatment-meta>
          <tp:nomenclature>
            <tp:taxon-name><object-id content-type="arpha">74C1733E-DD5A-59D2-A8C4-069A993B1641</object-id>
              <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part>
              <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="perrensi">perrensi</tp:taxon-name-part>
              <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subspecies" reg="iberaensis">iberaensis</tp:taxon-name-part>
              <object-id content-type="zoobank" xlink:type="simple">https://zoobank.org/BB2418C4-8284-4FF2-95F9-E17CCBF70C0A</object-id>
            </tp:taxon-name>
            <tp:taxon-status>subsp. nov.</tp:taxon-status>
            <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">Figures 7</xref>
            <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">, 9</xref>
          </tp:nomenclature>
          <tp:treatment-sec sec-type="Holotype" id="SECID0EBXAI">
            <title>Holotype.</title>
            <p><abbrev xlink:title="Fundación de Historia Natural “Félix de Azara”" id="ABBRID0EHXAI">CFA-MA</abbrev>-12676 (previously referred to as C-05470 in the personal collection of Julio R. Contreras), adult female; skin, skull and partial skeleton collected by J. Contreras on 29 May 1999 (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9">9</xref>).</p>
            <fig id="F9">
              <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/vz.76.e173627.figure9</object-id>
              <object-id content-type="arpha">8044A070-11BA-57FA-9258-E7D4F2C082E0</object-id>
              <label>Figure 9.</label>
              <caption>
                <p>Dorsal, ventral, and lateral views of the skull and labial view of the mandible of the holotype of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="perrensi">perrensi</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subspecies" reg="iberaensis">iberaensis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic><bold>subsp. nov</bold>. (<abbrev xlink:title="Fundación de Historia Natural “Félix de Azara”" id="ABBRID0EGYAI">CFA-MA</abbrev>-12676). Scale = 5 mm</p>
              </caption>
              <graphic xlink:href="vertebrate-zoology-76-317-g009.jpg" id="oo_1660561.jpg">
                <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/1660561</uri>
              </graphic>
            </fig>
          </tp:treatment-sec>
          <tp:treatment-sec sec-type="Type locality" id="SECID0EMYAI">
            <title>Type locality.</title>
            <p>Argentina, Corrientes, San Miguel, San Miguel (ca. <named-content content-type="dwc:verbatimCoordinates"><named-content content-type="geo-json" specific-use="{&quot;type&quot;:&quot;Point&quot;,&quot;coordinates&quot;:[-57.595901,-28.006401]}" id="NCID0EVYAI">–28.006401°, –57.595901°</named-content></named-content>).</p>
          </tp:treatment-sec>
          <tp:treatment-sec sec-type="Additional material" id="SECID0EZYAI">
            <title>Additional material.</title>
            <p>See Table S5.</p>
          </tp:treatment-sec>
          <tp:treatment-sec sec-type="Diagnosis" id="SECID0EDZAI">
            <title>Diagnosis.</title>
            <p>A medium-sized to large tuco-tuco of the <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="torquatus">torquatus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> species group. Compared with the nominotypical subspecies and <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="perrensi">perrensi</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subspecies" reg="dorbignyi">dorbignyi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="perrensi">perrensi</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subspecies" reg="iberaensis">iberaensis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic><bold>subsp. nov</bold>. is slightly smaller, with a proportionally narrower posterior portion of the skull, including the braincase breadth, the bimeatal breadth, and the mastoid breadth, and comparatively broader and larger nasal bones (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7">7</xref>; Table S5). <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="perrensi">perrensi</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subspecies" reg="iberaensis">iberaensis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic><bold>subsp. nov</bold>. also has a very distinctive karyotype (<abbrev xlink:title="analysis of diploid" id="ABBRID0EN2AI">2n</abbrev> = 41, 42, 44–46; <abbrev xlink:title="fundamental numbers" id="ABBRID0ER2AI">FN</abbrev> = 76, 78) that does not overlap with those of the other known subspecies (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3">3</xref>).</p>
          </tp:treatment-sec>
          <tp:treatment-sec sec-type="Measurements of the holotype" id="SECID0EZ2AI">
            <title>Measurements of the holotype.</title>
            <p>(in mm) <abbrev xlink:title="total length of the skull" id="ABBRID0E62AI">TLS</abbrev>, 44.04; <abbrev xlink:title="condyle-incisive length" id="ABBRID0ED3AI">CIL</abbrev>, 41.84; <abbrev xlink:title="nasal length" id="ABBRID0EH3AI">NL</abbrev>, 15.77; <abbrev xlink:title="nasal width" id="ABBRID0EL3AI">NW</abbrev>, 6.42; <abbrev xlink:title="rostral width" id="ABBRID0EP3AI">RW</abbrev>, 11.31; <abbrev xlink:title="frontal length" id="ABBRID0ET3AI">FL</abbrev>, 11.77; <abbrev xlink:title="interorbital constriction" id="ABBRID0EX3AI">IOC</abbrev>, 9.35; <abbrev xlink:title="greatest zygomatic breadth" id="ABBRID0E23AI">ZB</abbrev>, 28.21; <abbrev xlink:title="braincase breadth" id="ABBRID0E63AI">BB</abbrev>, 19.15; <abbrev xlink:title="bimeatal breadth" id="ABBRID0ED4AI">BMB</abbrev>, 26.28; <abbrev xlink:title="mastoid breadth" id="ABBRID0EH4AI">MB</abbrev>, 26.78; <abbrev xlink:title="infraorbital foramen length" id="ABBRID0EL4AI">IFL</abbrev>, 8.74; <abbrev xlink:title="diastema length" id="ABBRID0EP4AI">DL</abbrev>, 12.31; <abbrev xlink:title="palatal length" id="ABBRID0ET4AI">PL</abbrev>, 19.61; <abbrev xlink:title="upper incisors width" id="ABBRID0EX4AI">UIW</abbrev>, 7.4; <abbrev xlink:title="upper toothrow length" id="ABBRID0E24AI">UTL</abbrev>, 10.28; <abbrev xlink:title="upper fourth premolar length" id="ABBRID0E64AI">PM4L</abbrev>, 3.89.</p>
          </tp:treatment-sec>
          <tp:treatment-sec sec-type="Sperm type" id="SECID0ED5AI">
            <title>Sperm type.</title>
            <p>Symmetric.</p>
          </tp:treatment-sec>
          <tp:treatment-sec sec-type="Distribution" id="SECID0EI5AI">
            <title>Distribution.</title>
            <p><italic><tp:taxon-name>
                  <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="perrensi">perrensi</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subspecies" reg="iberaensis">iberaensis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic><bold>subsp. nov</bold>. is found at the margins of the Esteros del Iberá, mostly associated with sandy soils in well-drained areas. Specific localities include Curuzú Laurel, Loreto, San Miguel, San Alonso, Paraje Caimán, Contreras Cué, and Estancia la Tacuarita.</p>
          </tp:treatment-sec>
          <tp:treatment-sec sec-type="Etymology" id="SECID0EC6AI">
            <title>Etymology.</title>
            <p>The subspecific epithet is a Latinized adjective that refers to the main distribution area of this subspecies in the ecoregion of the Esteros del Iberá, in the province of Corrientes, Argentina. The Iberá wetlands are marked by strong environmental instability, with recurrent floods and droughts reshaping water availability and connectivity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Ferrati et al. 2005</xref>). Elongated sandy hills act as natural levees, fragmenting the landscape and creating isolated water bodies during low-water periods. Tuco-tucos of the Corrientes group, particularly <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="perrensi">perrensi</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subspecies" reg="iberaensis">iberaensis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic><bold>subsp. nov</bold>., experience cycles of deme isolation and reconnection: during floods, they remain on the sandy hills, where individuals from different demes may meet, and as waters recede, they recolonize lower habitats.</p>
          </tp:treatment-sec>
        </tp:taxon-treatment>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec sec-type="Conclusions" id="SECID0E46AI">
      <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>In this study, we reviewed the diversity of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> from the Corrientes group and re-delimited lineages, by applying an integrative approach, based on evidence from mitochondrial genes, cytogenetics, microsatellites, genomics, and morphological analysis. This enabled us to redefine its taxonomic composition and propose a coherent evolutionary scenario accounting for the genetic characteristics of each lineage.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ack>
      <title>Acknowledgements</title>
      <p>This work was financed by PICT 2020-01989. We are grateful to the staff at Fundación de Historia Natural "Félix de Azara", especially to Sergio Bogan for providing access to several of the studied specimens. Also, we wish to thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive feedback, which contributed to improve the quality of this manuscript.</p>
    </ack>
    <ref-list>
      <title>References</title>
      <ref id="B1">
        <mixed-citation>Argüelles CF, Suárez P, Giménez MD, Bidau CJ (2001) Intraspecific chromosome variation between different populations of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">dorbignyi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Rodentia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Ctenomyidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) from Argentina. Acta Theriologica 46: 363–373. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="10.4098/AT.arch.01-40" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.4098/AT.arch.01-40</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B2">
        <mixed-citation>Avise JC (1994) Molecular Markers, Natural History, and Evolution. Chapman &amp; Hall, New York, NY, 511 pp.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B3">
        <mixed-citation>Bágeľová Poláková S, Lichtner Ž, Szemes T, Smolejová M, Sulo P (2021) Mitochondrial DNA duplication, recombination, and introgression during interspecific hybridization. Scientific Reports 11: 12726. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="10.1038/s41598-021-92125-y" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92125-y</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B4">
        <mixed-citation>Baker RJ, Bradley RD (2006) Speciation in mammals and the genetic species concept. Journal of Mammalogy 87: 643–662. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="10.1644/06-MAMM-F-038R2.1" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1644/06-MAMM-F-038R2.1</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B5">
        <mixed-citation>Ballard JWO, Whitlock MC (2004) The incomplete natural history of mitochondria. Molecular Ecology 13: 729–744. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="10.1046/j.1365-294X.2003.02063.x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294X.2003.02063.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B6">
        <mixed-citation>Bidau CJ (2015) Family <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Ctenomyidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> Lesson, 1842. In: Patton JL, Pardiñas UFJ, D’Elía G (Eds) Mammals of South America, Volume 2: Rodents. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 818–877.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B7">
        <mixed-citation>Bouckaert R, Vaughan TG, Barido-Sottani J, Duchêne S, Fourment M, Gavryushkina A, Heled J, Jones G, Kühnert D, De Maio N, Matschiner M, Mendes FK, Müller NF, Ogilvie HA, Du Plessis L, Popinga A, Rambaut A, Rasmussen D, Siveroni I, Suchard MA, Wu C-H, Xie D, Zhang C, Stadler T, Drummond AJ (2019) BEAST 2.5: An advanced software platform for Bayesian evolutionary analysis. PLoS Computational Biology 15: e1006650. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006650" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006650</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B8">
        <mixed-citation>Brook F, Tomasco IH, González B, Martin GM (2022) A new species of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Rodentia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Ctenomyidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) from Patagonia related to <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">sociabilis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. Journal of Mammalian Evolution 29: 237–258. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="10.1007/s10914-021-09570-9" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10914-021-09570-9</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B9">
        <mixed-citation>Brown SDJ, Collins RA, Boyer S, Lefort M, Malumbres-Olarte J, Vink CJ, Cruickshank RH (2012) SPIDER: An R package for the analysis of species identity and evolution, with particular reference to DNA barcoding. Molecular Ecology Resources 12: 562–565. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="10.1111/j.1755-0998.2011.03108.x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2011.03108.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B10">
        <mixed-citation>Burbrink FT, Crother BI, Murray CM, Smith BT, Ruane S, Myers EA, Pyron RA (2022) Empirical and philosophical problems with the subspecies rank. Ecology and Evolution 12: e9069. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="10.1002/ece3.9069" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9069</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B11">
        <mixed-citation>Buschiazzo LM, Caraballo DA, Cálcena E, Longarzo ML, Labaroni CA, Ferro JM, Rossi MS, Bolzán AD, Lanzone C (2018) Integrative analysis of chromosome banding, telomere localization and molecular genetics in the highly variable <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> of the Corrientes group (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Rodentia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>; <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Ctenomyidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>). Genetica 146: 403–414. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="10.1007/s10709-018-0032-0" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10709-018-0032-0</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B12">
        <mixed-citation>Buschiazzo LM, Caraballo DA, Labaroni CA, Teta P, Rossi MS, Bidau CJ, Lanzone C (2022) Comprehensive cytogenetic analysis of the most chromosomally variable mammalian genus from South America: <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Rodentia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Caviomorpha</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Ctenomyidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>). Mammalian Biology 102: 1963–1979. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="10.1007/s42991-022-00312-9" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1007/s42991-022-00312-9</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B13">
        <mixed-citation>Caraballo DA (2023) Reassessing the causal connection between satDNA dynamics and chromosomal evolution in <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Rodentia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Ctenomyidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>): Unveiling the overlooked importance of the Y chromosome. Contributions to Zoology 92: 533–546. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="10.1163/18759866-bja10052" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1163/18759866-bja10052</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B14">
        <mixed-citation>Caraballo DA, Abruzzese GA, Rossi MS (2012) Diversity of tuco-tucos (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Rodentia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) in the northeastern wetlands from Argentina: Mitochondrial phylogeny and chromosomal evolution. Genetica 140: 125–136. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="10.1007/s10709-012-9664-7" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10709-012-9664-7</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B15">
        <mixed-citation>Caraballo DA, Jablonski PC, Rebagliati PJ, Rossi MS (2015) Chromosomal variability in tuco-tucos (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Rodentia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) from the Argentinean northeastern wetlands. Mastozoología Neotropical 22: 289–301.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B16">
        <mixed-citation>Caraballo DA, Rossi MS (2017) Integrative lineage delimitation in rodents of the <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Corrientes group. <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="class">Mammalia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> 82: 35–47. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="10.1515/mammalia-2016-0162" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1515/mammalia-2016-0162</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B17">
        <mixed-citation>Caraballo DA, Rossi MS (2018) Spatial and temporal divergence of the <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus"/><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">torquatus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> species group of the subterranean rodent <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>. Contributions to Zoology 87: 11–24. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="10.1163/18759866-08701002" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1163/18759866-08701002</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B18">
        <mixed-citation>Caraballo DA, Tomasco IH, Campo DH, Rossi MS (2016) Phylogenetic relationships between tuco- tucos (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>, <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Rodentia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) of the Corrientes group and the <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">pearsoni</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> complex. Mastozoología Neotropical 23: 39–49.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B19">
        <mixed-citation>Carnovale CS, Fernández GP, Merino ML, Mora MS (2021) Redefining the distributional boundaries and phylogenetic relationships for ctenomids from central Argentina. Frontiers in Genetics 12:698134. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="10.3389/fgene.2021.698134" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2021.698134</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B20">
        <mixed-citation>Christie JR, Beekman M (2017) Selective sweeps of mitochondrial DNA can drive the evolution of uniparental inheritance. Evolution 71: 2090–2099. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="10.1111/evo.13291" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.13291</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B21">
        <mixed-citation>Contreras JR, Contreras ANCH (1984) Diagnosis preliminar de una nueva especie de ‘anguyá tutú’ (género <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) para la provincia de Corrientes, Argentina (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="class">Mammalia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Rodentia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>). Historia Natural 4: 131–132.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B22">
        <mixed-citation>Coyne JA, Orr HA (2004) Speciation. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, 545 pp.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B23">
        <mixed-citation>De Freitas TRO, Fernandes FA, Fornel R, Roratto PA (2012) An endemic new species of tuco-tuco, genus <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Rodentia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Ctenomyidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>), with a restricted geographic distribution in southern Brazil. Journal of Mammalogy 93: 1355–1367. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="10.1644/12-MAMM-A-007.1" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1644/12-MAMM-A-007.1</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B24">
        <mixed-citation>de Queiroz K (2007) Species concepts and species delimitation. Systematic Biology 56: 879–886. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="10.1080/10635150701701083" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150701701083</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B25">
        <mixed-citation>de Queiroz K (2020) An updated concept of subspecies resolves a dispute about the taxonomy of incompletely separated lineages. Herpetological Review 51: 459–461.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B26">
        <mixed-citation>De Santi NAD, Verzi DH, Olivares AI, Piñero P, Álvarez A, Morgan CC (2021) A new Pleistocene <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> and divergence dating of the hyperdiverse South American rodent family <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Ctenomyidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>. Journal of Systematic Palaeontology 19: 377–392. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="10.1080/14772019.2021.1910583" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1080/14772019.2021.1910583</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B27">
        <mixed-citation>De Santi NA, Verzi DH, Olivares AI, Piñero P, Morgan CC, Medina ME, Rivero DE, Tonni EP (2020) A new peculiar species of the subterranean rodent <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Rodentia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Ctenomyidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) from the Holocene of central Argentina. Journal of South American Earth Sciences 100: 102499. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="10.1016/j.jsames.2020.102499" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2020.102499</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B28">
        <mixed-citation>D’Elía G, Teta P, Lessa EP (2021) A short overview of the systematics of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>: Species limits and phylogenetic relationships. In: de Freitas TRO, Gonçalves GL, Maestri R (Eds) Tuco-Tucos: An Evolutionary Approach to the Diversity of a Neotropical Subterranean Rodent. Springer, Cham, 17–41.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B29">
        <mixed-citation>Dobigny G, Aniskin V, Granjon L, Cornette R, Volobouev V (2005) Recent radiation in West African <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Taterillus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Rodentia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subfamily">Gerbillinae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>): The concerted role of chromosome and climatic changes. Heredity 95: 358–368. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="10.1038/sj.hdy.6800730" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.hdy.6800730</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B30">
        <mixed-citation>Dobigny G, Britton-Davidian J, Robinson TJ (2017) Chromosomal polymorphism in mammals: An evolutionary perspective: Chromosomal polymorphism in mammals. Biological Reviews 92: 1–21. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="10.1111/brv.12213" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12213</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B31">
        <mixed-citation>Faria R, Navarro A (2010) Chromosomal speciation revisited: Rearranging theory with pieces of evidence. Trends in Ecology &amp; Evolution 25: 660–669. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="10.1016/j.tree.2010.07.008" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2010.07.008</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B32">
        <mixed-citation>Fernández MJG, Gaggiotti OE, Mirol P (2012) The evolution of a highly speciose group in a changing environment: Are we witnessing speciation in the Iberá wetlands? Molecular Ecology 21: 3266–3282. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05598.x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05598.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B33">
        <mixed-citation>Ferrati R, Ana Canziani G, Ruiz Moreno D (2005) Esteros del Ibera: Hydrometeorological and hydrological characterization. Ecological Modelling 186: 3–15. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.01.021" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.01.021</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B34">
        <mixed-citation>Fornel R, Cordeiro-Estrela P, De Freitas TRO (2010) Skull shape and size variation in <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">minutus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Rodentia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Ctenomyidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) in geographical, chromosomal polymorphism, and environmental contexts. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 101: 705–720. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="10.1111/j.1095-8312.2010.01496.x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2010.01496.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B35">
        <mixed-citation>Freitas T (2016) Family <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Ctenomyidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> (Tuco-tucos). In: Wilson DE, Lacher TE, Mittermeier RA (Eds) Handbook of the Mammals of the World, Volume 6. Lagomorphs and Rodents I. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona, 498–534.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B36">
        <mixed-citation>Funk DJ, Omland KE (2003) Species-level paraphyly and polyphyly: Frequency, causes, and consequences, with insights from animal mitochondrial DNA. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 34: 397–423. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132421" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132421</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B37">
        <mixed-citation>Galtier N, Enard D, Radondy Y, Bazin E, Belkhir K (2006) Mutation hot spots in mammalian mitochondrial DNA. Genome Research 16: 215–222. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="10.1101/gr.4305906" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.4305906</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B38">
        <mixed-citation>Gardner SL, Salazar-Bravo J, Cook JA (2014) New species of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Blainville 1826 (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Rodentia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Ctenomyidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) from the lowlands and central valleys of Bolivia. Special Publications, Museum of Texas Tech University 62: 1–40. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="10.5962/bhl.title.142814" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.142814</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B39">
        <mixed-citation>Giménez MD, Mirol PM, Bidau CJ, Searle JB (2002) Molecular analysis of populations of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Caviomorpha</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Rodentia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) with high karyotypic variability. Cytogenetic and Genome Research 96: 130–136. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="10.1159/000063051" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1159/000063051</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B40">
        <mixed-citation>Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD (2001) PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica 4: 1.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B41">
        <mixed-citation>Iriondo MH (1991) El Holoceno en el Litoral. Comunicaciones del Museo Provincial de Ciencias Naturales “Florentino Ameghino” (Nueva Serie) 3: 1–40.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B42">
        <mixed-citation>Kartavtseva IV, Sheremetyeva IN, Pavlenko MV (2021) Intraspecies multiple chromosomal variations including rare tandem fusion in the Russian Far Eastern endemic evoron vole <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Alexandromys</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">evoronensis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Rodentia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subfamily">Arvicolinae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>). Comparative Cytogenetics 15: 393–411. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="10.3897/compcytogen.v15.i4.67112" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.3897/compcytogen.v15.i4.67112</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B43">
        <mixed-citation>Kavalco KF, Pasa R (2023) Chromosomal radiation: A model to explain karyotypic diversity in cryptic species. Genetics and Molecular Biology 46: e20230116. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="10.1590/1678-4685-gmb-2023-0116" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4685-gmb-2023-0116</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B44">
        <mixed-citation>Kim KS, Sappington TW (2013) Microsatellite data analysis for population genetics. In: Kantartzi SK (Ed.) Microsatellites. Methods in Molecular Biology. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ, 271–295. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="10.1007/978-1-62703-389-3_19" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-62703-389-3_19</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B45">
        <mixed-citation>King M (1995) Species Evolution: The Role of Chromosome Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 336 pp.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B46">
        <mixed-citation>Labaroni CA, Ferro JM, Buschiazzo L, De Cena R, Kleiniving M, García G, Calcena E, Bolzan A, Lanzone C (2023) Extraordinary chromosome diversity in the southernmost populations of the montane grass mouse <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Akodon</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">montensis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Cricetidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="subfamily">Sigmodontinae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>). Mammal Research 68: 355–365. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="10.1007/s13364-023-00687-1" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1007/s13364-023-00687-1</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B47">
        <mixed-citation>Lanzone C, Bidau CJ, Giménez MD, Santos JL (2002) Synaptic behaviour and morphological modifications of the X and Y chromosomes during pachytene in three species of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Rodentia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Caviomorpha</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Ctenomyidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>). Genome 45: 1110–1115. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="10.1139/g02-075" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1139/g02-075</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B48">
        <mixed-citation>Lanzone C, Giménez MD, Santos JL, Bidau CJ (2007) Meiotic effects of Robertsonian translocations in tuco-tucos of the <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">perrensi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> superspecies (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Rodentia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Ctenomyidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>). Caryologia 60: 233–244. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="10.1080/00087114.2007.10797942" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1080/00087114.2007.10797942</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B49">
        <mixed-citation><ext-link xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://www.zotero.org/google-docs/?zEASYd" ext-link-type="uri">Leigh JW, Bryant D (2015) POPART</ext-link>: Full-feature software for haplotype network construction. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 6: 1110–1116. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="10.1111/2041-210x.12410" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.12410</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B50">
        <mixed-citation>Lessa EP (1990) Morphological evolution of subterranean mammals: Integrating structural, functional, and ecological perspectives. Progress in Clinical and Biological Research 335: 211–230.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B51">
        <mixed-citation>Londoño-Gaviria M, Teta P, Ríos SD, Patterson BD (2019) Redescription and phylogenetic position of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">dorsalis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Thomas 1900, an enigmatic tuco tuco (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Rodentia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Ctenomyidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) from the Paraguayan Chaco. <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="class">Mammalia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> 83: 227–236. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="10.1515/mammalia-2018-0049" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1515/mammalia-2018-0049</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B52">
        <mixed-citation>Maddison WP (1997) Gene trees in species trees. Systematic Biology 46: 523–536. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="10.1093/sysbio/46.3.523" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/46.3.523</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B53">
        <mixed-citation>Maputla NW, Dempster ER, Raman J, Ferguson JWH (2011) Strong hybrid viability between two widely divergent chromosomal forms of the pouched mouse. Journal of Zoology 285: 180–187. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="10.1111/j.1469-7998.2011.00825.x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.2011.00825.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B54">
        <mixed-citation>Mirol P, Giménez MD, Searle JB, Bidau CJ, Faulkes CG (2010) Population and species boundaries in the South American subterranean rodent <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> in a dynamic environment. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 100: 368–383. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="10.1111/j.1095-8312.2010.01409.x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2010.01409.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B55">
        <mixed-citation>Molinari J (2023) A bare-bones scheme to choose between the species, subspecies, and ‘evolutionarily significant unit’ categories in taxonomy and conservation. Journal for Nature Conservation 72: 126335. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="10.1016/j.jnc.2023.126335" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2023.126335</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B56">
        <mixed-citation>Nylander JAA (2004) MrModeltest v2. Program distributed by the author, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B57">
        <mixed-citation>Ortells MO (1995) Phylogenetic analysis of G-banded karyotypes among the South American subterranean rodents of the genus <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Caviomorpha</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Octodontidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>), with special reference to chromosomal evolution and speciation. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 54: 43–70. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="10.1016/0024-4066(95)90036-5" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-4066(95)90036-5</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B58">
        <mixed-citation>Ortells MO, Barrantes GE (1994) A study of genetic distances and variability in several species of the genus <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Rodentia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Octodontidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>), with special reference to a probable causal role of chromosomes in speciation. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 53: 189–208. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="10.1006/bijl.1994.1068" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1006/bijl.1994.1068</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B59">
        <mixed-citation>Ortells MO, Contreras JR, Reig OA (1990) New <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> karyotypes (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Rodentia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Octodontidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>) from north-eastern Argentina and from Paraguay confirm the extreme chromosomal multiformity of the genus. Genetica 82: 189–201. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="10.1007/BF00056362" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00056362</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B60">
        <mixed-citation>Padial JM, De La Riva I (2009) Integrative taxonomy reveals cryptic Amazonian species of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Pristimantis</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Anura</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Strabomantidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 155: 97–122. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="10.1111/j.1096-3642.2008.00424.x" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.2008.00424.x</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B61">
        <mixed-citation>Padial JM, Miralles A, De La Riva I, Vences M (2010) The integrative future of taxonomy. Frontiers in Zoology 7: 16. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="10.1186/1742-9994-7-16" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-9994-7-16</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B62">
        <mixed-citation>Parada A, D’Elía G, Bidau CJ, Lessa EP (2011) Species groups and the evolutionary diversification of tuco-tucos, genus <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Rodentia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Ctenomyidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>). Journal of Mammalogy 92: 671–682. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="10.1644/10-MAMM-A-121.1" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1644/10-MAMM-A-121.1</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B63">
        <mixed-citation>Patten MA (2015) Subspecies and the philosophy of science. Auk 132: 481–485. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="10.1642/AUK-15-1.1" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1642/AUK-15-1.1</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B64">
        <mixed-citation>Patton JL, Sherwood SW (1983) Chromosome Evolution and Speciation in Rodents. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 14: 139–158. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="10.1146/annurev.es.14.110183.001035" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.14.110183.001035</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B65">
        <mixed-citation>Popolizio E (1977) Contribución a la geomorfología de la provincia de Corrientes. Centro de Geociencias Aplicadas, UNNE, Resistencia, Chaco, 45 pp.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B66">
        <mixed-citation>Putman AI, Carbone I (2014) Challenges in analysis and interpretation of microsatellite data for population genetic studies. Ecology and Evolution 4: 4399–4428. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="10.1002/ece3.1305" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1305</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B67">
        <mixed-citation>Rambaut A (2014) FigTree-v1. 4.2. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/" ext-link-type="uri">http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B68">
        <mixed-citation>Rambaut A, Drummond AJ, Xie D, Baele G, Suchard MA (2018) Posterior summarization in Bayesian phylogenetics using Tracer 1.7. Systematic Biology 67: 901–904. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="10.1093/sysbio/syy032" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syy032</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B69">
        <mixed-citation><ext-link xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://www.zotero.org/google-docs/?zEASYd" ext-link-type="uri">Reig OA, Busch C, Ortells MO, Contreras JR (1990) An overview of evolution, systematics, population biology, cytogenetics, molecular biology and speciation in</ext-link><ext-link xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://www.zotero.org/google-docs/?zEASYd" ext-link-type="uri"><italic>~~~PROTECTED_TN_244~~~</italic></ext-link>. Progress in Clinical and Biological Research 335: 71–96.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B70">
        <mixed-citation>Reydon TAC, Kunz W (2019) Species as natural entities, instrumental units and ranked taxa: New perspectives on the grouping and ranking problems. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 126: 623–636. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="10.1093/biolinnean/blz013" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1093/biolinnean/blz013</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B71">
        <mixed-citation>Reydon TAC, Kunz W (2021) Classification below the species level: When are infraspecific groups biologically meaningful? Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 134: 246–254. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="10.1093/biolinnean/blab067" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1093/biolinnean/blab067</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B72">
        <mixed-citation>Rieseberg LH (2001) Chromosomal rearrangements and speciation. Trends in Ecology &amp; Evolution 16: 351–358. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02187-5" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02187-5</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B73">
        <mixed-citation>Strauss RE (2010) Discriminating groups of organisms. In: Elewa AMT (Ed.) Morphometrics for Nonmorphometricians. Lecture Notes in Earth Sciences. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 73–91.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B74">
        <mixed-citation>Tamura K, Stecher G, Kumar S (2021) MEGA11: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11. Molecular Biology and Evolution 38: 3022–3027. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="10.1093/molbev/msab120" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msab120</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B75">
        <mixed-citation>Sánchez TR, Tomasco IH, Díaz MM, Barquez RM (2018) Contribution to the knowledge of the rare “Famatina tuco-tuco”, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species">famosus</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Thomas 1920 (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Rodentia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>: <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="family">Ctenomyidae</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>). <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="class">Mammalia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name> 83: 11–22. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="10.1515/mammalia-2017-0131" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1515/mammalia-2017-0131</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B76">
        <mixed-citation>Teta P, D’Elía G (2020) Uncovering the species diversity of subterranean rodents at the end of the World: Three new species of Patagonian tuco-tucos (<tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="order">Rodentia</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, <tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="suborder">Hystricomorpha</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name>, <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>). PeerJ 8: e9259. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="10.7717/peerj.9259" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9259</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B77">
        <mixed-citation>Tobe SS, Kitchener AC, Linacre AMT (2010) Reconstructing mammalian phylogenies: A detailed comparison of the cytochrome <italic>b</italic> and cytochrome oxidase subunit I mitochondrial genes. PLoS ONE 5: e14156. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="10.1371/journal.pone.0014156" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0014156</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B78">
        <mixed-citation>Tomasco IH, Ceballos SG, Austrich A, Brook F, Caraballo DA, Fernández GP, Lanzone C, Mora MS, Parada A, Sánchez RT, Lessa EP (2024) Underground speciation: Unraveling the systematics and evolution of the highly diverse tuco-tucos (genus <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>) with genomic data. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 199: 108163. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="10.1016/j.ympev.2024.108163" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2024.108163</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B79">
        <mixed-citation>Wickham H (2016) ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer, New York, NY. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org" ext-link-type="uri">https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B80">
        <mixed-citation>Zachos FE, Apollonio M, Bärmann EV, Festa-Bianchet M, Göhlich U, Habel JC, Haring E, Kruckenhauser L, Lovari S, McDevitt AD, Pertoldi C, Rössner GE, Sánchez-Villagra MR, Scandura M, Suchentrunk F (2013) Species inflation and taxonomic artefacts—A critical comment on recent trends in mammalian classification. Mammalian Biology 78: 1–6. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="10.1016/j.mambio.2012.07.083" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mambio.2012.07.083</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="B81">
        <mixed-citation>Zhang J, Kapli P, Pavlidis P, Stamatakis A (2013) A general species delimitation method with applications to phylogenetic placements. Bioinformatics 29: 2869–2876. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" ext-link-type="doi" xlink:href="10.1093/bioinformatics/btt499">https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btt499</ext-link></mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
    <fn-group>
      <fn>
        <p>Diego A. Caraballo and Denise H. Campo contributed equally to this work.</p>
      </fn>
    </fn-group>
    <sec sec-type="supplementary-material">
      <title>Supplementary materials</title>
      <supplementary-material id="S1" position="float" orientation="portrait" xlink:type="simple">
        <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/vz.76.e173627.suppl1</object-id>
        <object-id content-type="arpha">40D2ABEA-72E3-5640-871E-4F43D188580D</object-id>
        <label>Supplementary Material 1</label>
        <caption>
          <p>Supplementary Online Material SOM1</p>
        </caption>
        <statement content-type="dataType">
          <label>Data type</label>
          <p><bold/>: .mp4</p>
        </statement>
        <statement content-type="notes">
          <label>Explanation notes</label>
          <p><bold/>: Spatiotemporal diffusion of the <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> Corrientes group. Colors indicate lineages: <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="roigi">roigi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (dark green), <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="dorbignyi">dorbignyi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (blue), <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="perrensi">perrensi</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> (dark orange), Iberá (purple), Sarandicito (light orange), Santa Rosa (gray), and Manantiales (light green). This file is hosted in Zenodo. <ext-link xlink:type="simple" xlink:href="10.5281/zenodo.15741978" ext-link-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15741978</ext-link></p>
        </statement>
        <media xlink:href="vertebrate-zoology-76-317-s001.mp4" mimetype="video" mime-subtype="mp4" position="float" orientation="portrait" id="oo_1660562.mp4">
          <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/file/1660562</uri>
        </media>
        <permissions>
          <license>
            <license-p>This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0">http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0</ext-link>). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.</license-p>
          </license>
        </permissions>
        <attrib specific-use="authors"> Caraballo DA, Campo DH, Teta P, Lanzone C (2026)</attrib>
      </supplementary-material>
      <supplementary-material id="S2" position="float" orientation="portrait" xlink:type="simple">
        <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/vz.76.e173627.suppl2</object-id>
        <object-id content-type="arpha">AD7F5638-B562-57FF-877D-8099CF6B5314</object-id>
        <label>Supplementary Material 2</label>
        <caption>
          <p>Files S1, S2</p>
        </caption>
        <statement content-type="dataType">
          <label>Data type</label>
          <p><bold/>: .zip</p>
        </statement>
        <statement content-type="notes">
          <label>Explanation notes</label>
          <p><bold>File S1</bold>. Fasta alignment of partial sequences of three mitochondrial loci of the Corrientes group, plus two outgroups (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="pearsoni">pearsoni</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>). Positions 1–693, 694–1772, and 1773–2178, correspond to <abbrev xlink:title="cytochrome oxidase I" id="ABBRID0EPEAK">COI</abbrev>, cyt <italic>b</italic> and <abbrev xlink:title="control region" id="ABBRID0EVEAK">CR</abbrev>, respectively [.fas file]. — <bold>File S2</bold>. Median joining networks constructed for each locus separately [.pdf file].</p>
        </statement>
        <media xlink:href="vertebrate-zoology-76-317-s002.zip" mimetype="application" mime-subtype="x-zip-compressed" position="float" orientation="portrait" id="oo_1660563.zip">
          <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/file/1660563</uri>
        </media>
        <permissions>
          <license>
            <license-p>This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0">http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0</ext-link>). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.</license-p>
          </license>
        </permissions>
        <attrib specific-use="authors"> Caraballo DA, Campo DH, Teta P, Lanzone C (2026)</attrib>
      </supplementary-material>
      <supplementary-material id="S3" position="float" orientation="portrait" xlink:type="simple">
        <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/vz.76.e173627.suppl3</object-id>
        <object-id content-type="arpha">48ACCEFE-16B8-50DF-B0AA-C21EF7390D47</object-id>
        <label>Supplementary Material 3</label>
        <caption>
          <p>Figure S1</p>
        </caption>
        <statement content-type="dataType">
          <label>Data type</label>
          <p><bold/>: .jpeg</p>
        </statement>
        <statement content-type="notes">
          <label>Explanation notes</label>
          <p><bold/>: Results of the bPTP coalescent-based delimitation analysis based on the <abbrev xlink:title="mitochondrial" id="ABBRID0EBGAK">mtDNA</abbrev> phylogeny. Red lines indicate branches assigned to the same species, whereas blue lines indicate boundaries between different species. Numbers above branches indicate the Bayesian posterior probability (reflecting how frequently a given partition appears across the posterior distribution of trees or partitions).</p>
        </statement>
        <media xlink:href="vertebrate-zoology-76-317-s003.jpg" mimetype="image" mime-subtype="jpeg" position="float" orientation="portrait" id="oo_1660564.jpg">
          <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/file/1660564</uri>
        </media>
        <permissions>
          <license>
            <license-p>This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0">http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0</ext-link>). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.</license-p>
          </license>
        </permissions>
        <attrib specific-use="authors"> Caraballo DA, Campo DH, Teta P, Lanzone C (2026)</attrib>
      </supplementary-material>
      <supplementary-material id="S4" position="float" orientation="portrait" xlink:type="simple">
        <object-id content-type="doi">10.3897/vz.76.e173627.suppl4</object-id>
        <object-id content-type="arpha">FE8344A2-B729-51D9-861A-4E2E3CA9CECD</object-id>
        <label>Supplementary Material 4</label>
        <caption>
          <p>Tables S1–S5</p>
        </caption>
        <statement content-type="dataType">
          <label>Data type</label>
          <p><bold/>: .jpeg</p>
        </statement>
        <statement content-type="notes">
          <label>Explanation notes</label>
          <p><bold>Table SS1</bold>. Uncorrected p distance table (cyt <italic>b</italic>) with all available <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> sequences. The final alignment comprises 361 nucleotide sequences belonging to 49 <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> species, plus 46 sequences that correspond to the Corrientes group. — <bold>Table SS2</bold>. Individual measurements for <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> specimens used in morphological analysis. See “Materials and methods” for collection acronyms. — <bold>Table S3</bold>. Intralineage uncorrected p-genetic distances (mean and standard error) calculated from the concatenated dataset consisting of a total of 2178 bp (693, 1079, and 406 bp, for <abbrev xlink:title="cytochrome oxidase I" id="ABBRID0EOIAK">COI</abbrev>, cyt <italic>b</italic>, and <abbrev xlink:title="control region" id="ABBRID0EUIAK">CR</abbrev>, respectively), for all putative species/lineages of the Corrientes group, and the closest outgroup (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="pearsoni">pearsoni</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>). Mean distances were divided by the number of localities of each lineage (last column). — <bold>Table S4</bold>. Interlineage uncorrected p-genetic distances (mean and standard error) calculated from the concatenated dataset consisting of a total of 2178 bp (693, 1079, and 406 bp, for <abbrev xlink:title="cytochrome oxidase I" id="ABBRID0EJJAK">COI</abbrev>, cyt <italic>b</italic>, and <abbrev xlink:title="control region" id="ABBRID0EPJAK">CR</abbrev>, respectively), for all putative species/lineages of the Corrientes group, and the closest outgroup (<italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">C.</tp:taxon-name-part> <tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="species" reg="pearsoni">pearsoni</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic>). — <bold>Table S5</bold>. Descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation [S.D.], and range [Min.-Max.]) for 17 craniodental measurements in four lineages of <italic><tp:taxon-name><tp:taxon-name-part taxon-name-part-type="genus" reg="Ctenomys">Ctenomys</tp:taxon-name-part></tp:taxon-name></italic> from Corrientes. See “Materials and methods” for an explanation of the abbreviations.</p>
        </statement>
        <media xlink:href="vertebrate-zoology-76-317-s004.zip" mimetype="application" mime-subtype="x-zip-compressed" position="float" orientation="portrait" id="oo_1660565.zip">
          <uri content-type="original_file">https://binary.pensoft.net/file/1660565</uri>
        </media>
        <permissions>
          <license>
            <license-p>This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0">http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0</ext-link>). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.</license-p>
          </license>
        </permissions>
        <attrib specific-use="authors"> Caraballo DA, Campo DH, Teta P, Lanzone C (2026)</attrib>
      </supplementary-material>
    </sec>
  </back>
</article>
