Research Article |
Corresponding author: Ninda L. Baptista ( nindabaptista@gmail.com ) Academic editor: Uwe Fritz
© 2023 Ninda L. Baptista, Pedro Vaz Pinto, Chad Keates, Javier Lobón-Rovira, Shelley Edwards, Mark-Oliver Rödel.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Baptista NL, Vaz Pinto P, Keates C, Lobón-Rovira J, Edwards S, Rödel M-O (2023) Two new Poyntonophrynus species (Anura: Bufonidae) highlight the importance of Angolan centers of endemism. Vertebrate Zoology 73: 991-1031. https://doi.org/10.3897/vz.73.e103935
|
Abstract
The pygmy toad genus Poyntonophrynus is endemic to southern Africa. The morphology of these small toads is conserved. They are usually dully colored, and are predominately adapted to arid conditions. During recent surveys in Angola we found Poyntonophrynus specimens that were not assignable to known species. Using an integrative approach, based on mitochondrial and nuclear DNA, morphology, osteology, biogeography and ecology, we identified three new lineages, and describe two of them as new species. All three lineages are closely related to P. pachnodes, an Angolan endemic species, but they are geographically isolated from it. The new species are morphologically distinguishable, and are associated with two of the most important Angolan centers of endemism: the western escarpment and the central highlands. In order to get a more comprehensive understanding of the osteology of the genus, we also provide an osteological characterization of P. dombensis, which was not available to date. Our findings i) increase the number of earless species in the genus Poyntonophrynus, ii) emphasize southwestern Africa as the cradle of diversification in this genus, iii) report the occurrence of Poyntonophrynus in humid environments, thus showing that these toads are ecologically more variable than previously thought, and iv) underline the importance of further biodiversity studies in Angolan centers of endemism.
O sapo-pigmeu do género Poyntonophrynus é endémico da África Austral. A morfologia destes pequenos sapos é pouco variável. Estes têm uma coloração geralmente parda, e estão predominantemente adaptados a ambientes áridos. Durante pesquisas recentes em Angola, encontrámos Poyntonophrynus que não correspondiam a nenhuma espécie conhecida. Usando uma abordagem integrativa baseada em DNA mitocondrial e nuclear, morfologia, osteologia, biogeografia e ecologia, identificámos três novas linhagens, duas das quais foram descritas como espécies novas. As três linhagens estão geneticamente próximas de P. pachnodes, uma espécie endémica de Angola, mas estão geograficamente isoladas desta espécie. As novas espécies são morfologicamente distintas, e estão associadas a dois dos mais importantes centros de endemismo angolanos: a escarpa e as terras altas. Para contribuir para o conhecimento da osteologia do género, fizemos também uma caracterização osteológica de P. dombensis, inexistente até à data. Os nossos resultados i) aumentam o número de espécies sem aparelho auditivo no género Poyntonophrynus, ii) reforçam o sudoeste de África como o centro de diversificação deste género, iii) relatam a ocorrência de Poyntonophrynus em floresta húmida, revelando que estes sapos são ecologicamente mais variáveis do que se pensava, e iv) realçam a importância de estudos mais aprofundados nos centros de endemismo angolanos.
Amphibia, Angolan escarpment, Angolan highlands, character displacement, pygmy toad, sexual dichromatism, speciation, syntopy
Amphibia, deslocamento de caracteres, dicromatismo sexual, escarpa de Angola, especiação, sapo pigmeu, sintopia, terras altas de Angola
Angola is the largest African country south of the Equator and, in spite of the relative paucity of scientific studies, holds some of the richest flora and fauna in the continent (
Pygmy toads of the genus Poyntonophrynus are habitat specialists, with many species being rupicolous, inhabiting granite outcrops in dry and sandy areas (
Several taxonomic questions are associated with Poyntonophrynus. At the genus level, the separation between Poyntonophrynus and Mertensophryne is not resolved, neither by genetics, nor by osteology or morphology. As far as is currently understood, Poyntonophrynus is not monophyletic, with one species, P. lughensis (Loveridge, 1932), assignable to Mertensophryne (
South-western Africa is considered as the cradle of diversity of Poyntonophrynus (
Between 2016 and 2021, extensive herpetological surveys were conducted on the Angolan highlands and escarpment, targeting amphibians in the rainy season. These efforts led to the detection and collection of 25 specimens from previously unknown populations of Poyntonophrynus in both regions. In addition, we collected five pygmy toads from the coastal plain and the inselberg of Serra da Neve (Fig.
The phylogenetic relationships of samples of Poyntonophrynus were estimated using genetic information from 45 specimens, covering multiple newly sampled localities across Angola, and other parts of southern Africa (Table
List of Poyntonophrynus and other toad genera vouchers examined in this study and their associated metadata. Catalogue numbers of holotypes in bold. NA – not available.
Species | Catalogue number | Field number | Country, locality | Latitude | Longitude | 12S | 16S | COI | RAG1 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Poyntonophrynus fernandae sp. nov. (lineage B) | BMNH 2021.7535 | EI-0704 | Angola, Quibala | -10.7399 | 14.979755 | OR692225 | OR692259 | OR717565 | OR698990 |
Poyntonophrynus fernandae sp. nov. (lineage B) | FKH 1086 | EI-0725 | Angola, Quibala | -10.7399 | 14.979755 | OR692226 | OR692260 | OR717566 | OR698991 |
Poyntonophrynus fernandae sp. nov. (lineage B) | BMNH 2021.7534 | NB0431 | Angola, Congulo | -10.883889 | 14.271667 | OR692238 | OR692272 | OR717578 | OR699003 |
Poyntonophrynus fernandae sp. nov. (lineage B) |
|
NB0805 | Angola, Condé | -10.746667 | 14.629444 | OR692232 | OR692266 | OR717572 | OR698997 |
Poyntonophrynus fernandae sp. nov. (lineage B) |
|
NB0806 | Angola, Condé | -10.746667 | 14.629444 | OR692233 | OR692267 | OR717573 | OR698998 |
Poyntonophrynus cf. fernandae (lineage A) | BMNH 2021.7536 | P0-34 | Angola, Chinhundo | -11.914685 | 14.740552 | OR692249 | OR692283 | OR717589 | OR699013 |
Poyntonophrynus cf. fernandae (lineage A) |
|
P0-36 | Angola, Chinhundo | -11.914685 | 14.740552 | OR692251 | OR692285 | OR717591 | OR699015 |
Poyntonophrynus cf. fernandae (lineage A) |
|
NB0454 | Angola, Chinhundo | -11.914685 | 14.740552 | OR692229 | OR692263 | OR717569 | OR698994 |
Poyntonophrynus cf. fernandae (lineage A) | FKH-0463 | P0-38 | Angola, Chinhundo | -11.914685 | 14.740552 | OR692253 | OR692287 | OR717593 | OR699017 |
Poyntonophrynus nambensis sp. nov. (lineage C) |
|
NB0456 | Angola, Fazenda Namba | -11.914167 | 14.820556 | OR692230 | OR692264 | OR717570 | OR698995 |
Poyntonophrynus nambensis sp. nov (lineage C). |
|
NB0457 | Angola, Fazenda Namba | -11.914167 | 14.820556 | OR692231 | OR692265 | OR717571 | OR698996 |
Poyntonophrynus nambensis sp. nov. (lineage C) |
|
P0-35 | Angola, Chinhundo | -11.914685 | 14.740552 | OR692250 | OR692284 | OR717590 | OR699014 |
Poyntonophrynus nambensis sp. nov. (lineage C) | FKH-0457 | P0-32 | Angola, Chinhundo | -11.914685 | 14.740552 | OR692247 | OR692281 | OR717587 | OR699011 |
Poyntonophrynus nambensis sp. nov. (lineage C) | FKH-0458 | P0-33 | Angola, Chinhundo | -11.914685 | 14.740552 | OR692248 | OR692282 | OR717588 | OR699012 |
Poyntonophrynus nambensis sp. nov. (lineage C) | FKH-0462 | P0-37 | Angola, Chinhundo | -11.914685 | 14.740552 | OR692252 | OR692286 | OR717592 | OR699016 |
Poyntonophrynus nambensis sp. nov. (lineage C) | FKH-0377 | JLRZC0027 | Angola, Missão da Namba | -11.922078 | 14.835542 | OR692243 | OR692277 | OR717583 | OR699007 |
Poyntonophrynus nambensis sp. nov. (lineage C) | N/A (not collected) | JLRZC0012 | Angola, Missão da Namba | -11.922078 | 14.835542 | OR692242 | OR692276 | OR717582 | OR699006 |
Poyntonophrynus nambensis sp. nov. (lineage C) | FKH-0378 | JLRZC0028 | Angola, Missão da Namba | -11.922078 | 14.835542 | OR692244 | OR692278 | OR717584 | OR699008 |
Poyntonophrynus nambensis sp. nov. (lineage C) | FKH-0380 | JLRZC0030 | Angola, Fazenda Namba | -11.914167 | 14.820556 | OR692245 | OR692279 | OR717585 | OR699009 |
Poyntonophrynus nambensis sp. nov. (lineage C) | FKH-0381 | JLRZC0031 | Angola, Fazenda Namba | -11.914167 | 14.820556 | OR692246 | OR692280 | OR717586 | OR699010 |
Poyntonophrynus beiranus | HF 30 | Mozambique, Taratibu | KY555625 | KY555650 | KY555665 | KY555721 | |||
Poyntonophrynus dombensis | AG 117 | Angola, Meva Bay | -13.414444 | 12.579167 | OR692222 | OR692256 | OR717562 | OR698988 | |
Poyntonophrynus dombensis | AG 118 | Angola, Meva Bay | -13.414444 | 12.579167 | OR692223 | OR692257 | OR717563 | ||
Poyntonophrynus dombensis | AG 120 | Angola, Meva Bay | -13.414444 | 12.579167 | OR692224 | OR692258 | OR717564 | OR698989 | |
Poyntonophrynus dombensis |
|
JLRZC0086 | Angola, Mariquita | -14.853229 | 12.396146 | OR692239 | OR692273 | OR717579 | OR699004 |
Poyntonophrynus dombensis | FKH-0406 | JLRZC0087 | Angola, Mariquita | -14.853229 | 12.396146 | OR692240 | OR692274 | OR717580 | OR699005 |
Poyntonophrynus dombensis |
|
JLRZC0088 | Angola, Mariquita | -14.853229 | 12.396146 | OR692241 | OR692275 | OR717581 | |
Poyntonophrynus dombensis | damaB | Namibia, Brandberg | AF220857 | AF220905 | |||||
Poyntonophrynus dombensis | damaA | Namibia, Brandberg | AF220906 | ||||||
Poyntonophrynus fenoulheti | fenoB | South Africa, Kranzkop | OR692227 | OR692261 | OR717567 | OR698992 | |||
Poyntonophrynus fenoulheti | fenoC | South Africa, Mashatu | OR692228 | OR692262 | OR717568 | OR698993 | |||
Poyntonophrynus fenoulheti | AACRG 1598 | South Africa, Phalaborwa | KF664732 | KF665265 | KF665592 | KF666249 | |||
Poyntonophrynus fenoulheti | AACRG 1599 | South Africa, Phalaborwa | KF664816 | KF665081 | KF665728 | KF666357 | |||
Poyntonophrynus fenoulheti | fenoA | South Africa, Mkuze | AF220859 | AF220908 | |||||
Poyntonophrynus grandisonae | CHL 0903 | NB903 | Angola, Chapéu Armado | -14.45 | 12.35 | OR692254 | OR692288 | ||
Poyntonophrynus grandisonae | FKH-0533 | P1-20 | Angola, SSW Bibala | -14.856899 | 13.158968 | OR692255 | OR692289 | OR699018 | |
Poyntonophrynus grandisonae | AMB 10337 | Angola, Dolondolo, Serra da Neve | -13.77704 | 13.25905 | MH469716 | MH469717 | |||
Poyntonophrynus damaranus | BP-001 | Namibia, Ondobe | KY555627 | KY555648 | KY555658 | ||||
Poyntonophrynus lughensis | VG001 | Kenya, NW of Laisamis, Kaisut Desert | KY555626 | KY555641 | KY555659 | KY555723 | |||
Poyntonophrynus pachnodes | UF 184184 | pachA | Angola, Serra da Neve | -13.77704 | 13.25905 | MH469718 | MH469719 | ||
Poyntonophrynus pachnodes | FKH-0878 | JLRZ0241 | Angola, Serra da Neve | -13.758650 | 13.225194 | OR692290 | OR699019 | ||
Poyntonophrynus pachnodes | FKH-0879 | JLRZ0242 | Angola, Serra da Neve | -13.758650 | 13.225194 | OR692291 | OR699020 | ||
Poyntonophrynus vertebralis |
|
WC-3458 | South Africa, Commando Drift Nature Reserve | -32.111944 | 26.03750 | OR692234 | OR692268 | OR717574 | OR698999 |
Poyntonophrynus vertebralis |
|
WC-3460 | South Africa, Commando Drift Nature Reserve | -32.111944 | 26.03750 | OR692235 | OR692269 | OR717575 | OR699000 |
Poyntonophrynus vertebralis |
|
WC-3459 | South Africa, Commando Drift Nature Reserve | -32.111944 | 26.03750 | OR692236 | OR692270 | OR717576 | OR699001 |
Poyntonophrynus vertebralis |
|
WC-DNA-181 | South Africa, 4km on Doornfontein Rd of the R61 | -32.025581 | 25.319722 | OR692237 | OR692271 | OR717577 | OR699002 |
Poyntonophrynus vertebralis | vertA | South Africa, NA | AF220860 | ||||||
Capensibufo rosei | KTH09-335 | South Africa, Silvermine, WC | KF664868 | KF665294 | KF665706 | KF666159 | |||
Mertensophryne lindneri | BM 2002.394 | Tanzania, Ruvu South | KF664736 | KF665426 | KF665790 | KF666333 | |||
Mertensophryne howelli | MTSNT2202 | Tanzania, Zanzibar Island, Kiwenga Forest | KF664736 | KF665426 | KF665790 | KF666333 | |||
Mertensophryne anotis | HF3 | Mozambique, Taributo | KY555630 | KY555643 | KY555662 | KY555712 | |||
Vandijkophrynus angusticeps | AC2692 | South Africa, Stellenbosch | KF664791 | KF665432 | KF665693 | KF666237 | |||
Vandijkophrynus gariepensis | VC178 | South Africa, Die Hel Rd | KF664828 | KF665376 | KF665613 | KF666339 | |||
Vandijkophrynus robinsoni | AACRG 0068 | South Africa, Northern Cape | KF664648 | KF665375 | KF665788 | KF666198 | |||
Poyntonophrynus damaranus | FB.Po.D1 | Namibia, Okonjima | -20.8592 | 16.6408 | OR692292 | OR699021 | |||
Poyntonophrynus hoeschi | FB 341 | Namibia, Windhoek, Avis Dam | -22.5726 | 17.1333 | ON510295 | OR699022 | |||
Poyntonophrynus grindleyi |
|
Mozambique, Chimanimani Mts | -19.7637 | 33.0881 | ON510296 | ON623708 | |||
Poyntonophrynus damaranus | NMNW 11200 | Namibia, Okonjima | -20.8592 | 16.6408 | OR692293 | OR699023 | |||
Poyntonophrynus damaranus | NMNW 11187 | Namibia, Gobabis dist, Farm Marne | -22.4184 | 18.854 | OR692294 | OR699024 | |||
Poyntonophrynus hoeschi | NMNW 11197 | Namibia, Windhoek, Avis Dam | -22.5726 | 17.1333 | ON510300 | ON623709 | |||
Poyntonophrynus damaranus | NMNW 11198 | Namibia, Okonjima | -20.8592 | 16.6408 | OR692295 | ||||
Poyntonophrynus damaranus | NMNW 11188 | Namibia, Gobabis dist, Farm Marne | -22.4184 | 18.854 | OR692296 | ||||
Poyntonophrynus damaranus | NMNW 11186 | Namibia, Gobabis dist, Farm Marne | -22.4184 | 18.854 | ON510304 |
A standard salt extraction (
Gene | Primer | Length (bp) | Source | Annealing temperature (°C) | Cycles |
12S | L1091: 5’-AAAAAGCTTCAAACTGGGATTAGATACCCCACTAT-3’ R1478: 5’-TGACTGCAGAGGGTGACGGGCGGTGTGT-3’ | 367 |
|
58 | 35 |
16S | L2510: 5’-CGCCTGTTTATCAAAAACAT-3’ H3080: 5’-CCGGTCTGAACTCAGATCACG7-3’ | 542 |
|
50–52 | 35 |
COI | P3F: 5’-CAATACCAAACCCCCTTRTTYGTWTGATC-3’ P3R: 5’-GCTTCTCARATAATAAATATYAT-3’ | 771 |
|
42 | 35 |
RAG1 | RAG1.Mart.FL1: 5’-AGCTGCAGYCARTAYCAYAARATGTA-3’ RAG1.AMP.R1: 5’-AACTCAGCTGCATTKCCAATRTCA-3’ | 867 |
|
54–55 | 35 |
The sequence trace files were checked using BioEdit Sequence Alignment Editor v.7.2.5 (
The individual, and the first and second combined codon positions, were tested separately for saturation using DAMBE v.6.4.67 (
Maximum likelihood (ML) analysis was conducted using IQ-TREE v.2.1.2 (
Based on the findings from the initial phylogenetic tree, Poyntonophrynus was investigated using species delimitation analyses to determine whether the genus harbours unappreciated species diversity. Outgroup taxa were removed, leaving only members of Poyntonophrynus [excluding P. lughensis (Loveridge, 1932)] for single locus species delimitation. The 16S gene was chosen as it had the best representation across the genus. Automatic Barcode Discovery (ABGD), Assemble Species by Automatic Partitioning (ASAP), Poisson Tree Processes (PTP), and Pairwise Distance Thresholds (PDT) were used to determine whether the topological structuring and novel sequences from previous phylogenies constitute separate species.
Firstly, a 16S alignment was created and uploaded onto the ABGD web interface (abgd web (mnhn.fr), web version 07 July 2022) and the ASAP Web Interface (ASAP web (mnhn.fr), web version 07 July 2022). For ABGD, the following settings were used: standard p-distance metrics, minimum barcode gap width (1.5), intraspecific divergence minima (0.001) and maxima (0.1). For ASAP, the Simple Distance (p-distances) substitution model was used. Secondly, a 16S ML tree was created in IQTREE using the GTR + G substitution model and the same settings implemented in the multi-locus phylogeny. The phylogeny was rendered as a newick file, using Figtree, and uploaded unrooted onto the bPTP web server (http://species.h-its.org/ptp;
A haplotype network was created using the RAG1 marker (785 bp) to elucidate the population structuring of the Angolan Poyntonophrynus using all available sequences. Sequences with more than 10% missing data (ambiguous nucleotide positions), were removed from the analysis, resulting in 37 sequences being retained for the analysis, each of which 785 base pairs long. A median-joining haplotype network (
Measurements were obtained from a total of 42 Poyntonophrynus specimens exclusively collected in Angola. Definitions and terminology were adapted from
Females were identified based on the presence of eggs, visible through transparent skin, eggs detectable by a hard and rounded belly, or eggs seen after dissection. Males were identified by the presence of nuptial pads consisting of a dense covering of minute, often dark, asperities on upper and inner surfaces of first and second fingers and inner metacarpal tubercle, sometimes only visible under a dissecting microscope. Specimens lacking these obvious male or female features were classified as of ‘unidentified sex’. Qualitative features such as conspicuousness of tympanum and parotoid glands may be affected by the preservation of specimens, and classification may differ between observers. Moreover, terminology regarding skin features (e.g. asperities, granules, rosettes, spines, spinose warts, spinules, tubercles, warts), or characterization of skin texture (e.g. granular, leathery, rough, rugose, smooth, warty), varies between authors (e.g.
Only data from adult specimens were used for the morphometric analysis. Following
Skulls and entire bodies of five females and four males of some of the recently collected Poyntonophrynus specimens, including populations from unidentified species and from P. dombensis, were analyzed in detail (list of examined vouchers in Table S2). These frogs were compared to the anatomy of P. pachnodes (
Both the BI and ML algorithm revealed identical topologies for Poyntonophrynus with varying levels of nodal support. Whilst the ML algorithm lacked strong support at the deeper nodes, both algorithms found strong support at the inter-species and intra-lineage levels. In addition to the described species, both algorithms recovered three novel lineages: A, B, and C and Mertensophryne nested within Poyntonophrynus. The phylogenetic tree illustrates that all three novel Angolan lineages (A–C) are closest related to P. pachnodes (Fig.
Maximum Likelihood multi-locus (12S, 16S, COI, RAG1) phylogenetic tree of Poyntonophrynus and Mertensophryne with Bayesian Inference multi-locus support overlaid. The bars to the right of the phylogeny represent the putative taxa assignments from the single locus species delimitation methods employed on the 16S dataset.
Sequence divergence (uncorrected average pairwise distance values, expressed in percentages) for the examined portion of the mitochondrial 16S gene, for all available Poyntonophrynus species and several species of Mertensophryne. Numbers in diagonal (in bold) denote intraspecific divergences, numbers below the diagonal denote interspecific divergences, and numbers above the diagonal denote the standard error of the interspecific divergences. NA–Not Available.
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | ||
1 | P. beiranus | NA | 1.27 | 1.20 | 1.21 | 1.44 | 1.27 | 1.24 | 1.38 | 1.42 | 1.43 | 1.37 | 1.29 | 1.35 | 1.31 | 1.30 |
2 | P. damaranus | 9.60 | 2.61 | 0.81 | 1.04 | 1.32 | 1.04 | 0.99 | 1.23 | 1.24 | 1.20 | 1.14 | 1.24 | 1.28 | 1.31 | 1.37 |
3 | P. dombensis | 8.90 | 5.90 | 3.54 | 0.96 | 1.26 | 0.93 | 0.92 | 1.16 | 1.21 | 1.16 | 1.15 | 1.15 | 1.24 | 1.23 | 1.29 |
4 | P. fenoulheti | 8.60 | 7.51 | 7.06 | 1.24 | 1.14 | 0.65 | 0.78 | 1.06 | 1.12 | 1.07 | 1.10 | 1.06 | 1.24 | 1.23 | 1.28 |
5 | P. grandisonae | 12.47 | 12.02 | 11.50 | 8.96 | 0.40 | 1.16 | 1.25 | 1.19 | 1.26 | 1.24 | 1.37 | 1.15 | 1.16 | 1.16 | 1.26 |
6 | P. grindleyi | 8.59 | 6.77 | 6.20 | 2.99 | 8.85 | NA | 0.80 | 1.12 | 1.11 | 1.10 | 1.09 | 0.98 | 1.23 | 1.24 | 1.32 |
7 | P. hoeschi | 8.01 | 6.57 | 6.34 | 4.00 | 9.65 | 3.30 | NA | 1.09 | 1.14 | 1.10 | 1.05 | 1.06 | 1.24 | 1.28 | 1.27 |
8 | P. pachnodes | 9.97 | 9.24 | 8.97 | 6.43 | 9.35 | 6.60 | 6.01 | 0.26 | 0.82 | 0.70 | 1.20 | 1.19 | 1.26 | 1.25 | 1.34 |
9 | P. cf. fernandae (lineage A) | 11.07 | 8.93 | 9.42 | 7.35 | 10.13 | 6.41 | 6.75 | 3.50 | 0.19 | 0.57 | 1.20 | 1.21 | 1.26 | 1.27 | 1.39 |
10 | P. fernandae sp. nov. (lineage B) | 11.64 | 9.30 | 9.46 | 7.15 | 9.81 | 6.66 | 6.86 | 2.95 | 2.04 | 0.66 | 1.23 | 1.15 | 1.24 | 1.23 | 1.32 |
11 | P. nambensis sp. nov. (lineage C) | 10.47 | 8.53 | 9.08 | 7.75 | 11.60 | 6.69 | 6.11 | 8.63 | 8.09 | 8.95 | 0.12 | 1.20 | 1.32 | 1.36 | 1.35 |
12 | P. vertebralis | 9.56 | 9.79 | 9.32 | 7.22 | 8.59 | 6.19 | 6.48 | 7.34 | 8.07 | 7.85 | 8.90 | 0.75 | 1.16 | 1.20 | 1.21 |
13 | M. anotis | 12.23 | 11.35 | 11.39 | 10.55 | 8.80 | 10.12 | 10.12 | 9.70 | 10.01 | 9.41 | 11.18 | 9.14 | NA | 0.60 | 0.97 |
14 | M. howelli | 12.04 | 11.84 | 11.31 | 10.59 | 8.80 | 10.51 | 10.89 | 9.96 | 10.40 | 9.57 | 11.56 | 9.93 | 1.92 | NA | 0.99 |
15 | M. lindneri | 10.85 | 11.98 | 11.27 | 10.33 | 9.79 | 10.49 | 9.71 | 9.75 | 10.97 | 9.86 | 11.45 | 8.77 | 5.18 | 5.37 | NA |
The network for the RAG1 nuclear marker (Fig.
The haplotype network adjacent to the phylogeny illustrates the relationship between Poyntonophrynus and several Mertensophryne species using the RAG1 marker. Notches between haplotypes represent nucleotide substitutions, and circles’ size represents the number of samples sharing the same haplotype.
The single-locus species delimitation methods retrieved varying numbers of putative taxa. ABGD, ASAP and PTP analysis recognized 14, 19, 16 species, respectively (Fig.
Throughout the entire genus sampling, the various species delimitation methods highlighted either an under-appreciation or over-appreciation of species diversity as currently understood. Both ASAP and PTP recognized a cryptic species within P. fenoulheti, whilst ASAP recovered an unrecognized species within P. dombensis. Whilst not the focus of this study, P. fenoulheti should be investigated in further detail in future studies to elucidate the most accurate taxonomical structuring of the species.
The recently collected Angolan specimens were assignable to the genus Poyntonophrynus by being small, having flattened bodies, lacking tarsal folds, and having usually double subarticular tubercles (
Compilation of morphology, distribution and ecology of Poyntonophrynus taxa. Data from specimens collected for this work and from museums, original descriptions, and additional literature:
P. fernandae sp. nov. (lineage B) | P. cf. fernandae (lineage A) | P. nambensis sp. nov. (lineage C) | P. pachnodes | P. grindleyi | P. hoeschi | P. jordani | P. lughensis | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Max SVL (mm) | 31.6 (F) 23.9 (M) | 29.9 (F) 25.8 (M) | 34.9 (F) 26.5 (M) | 33.7 (?) | 33 (F) 27.7 (M) | 37 (F) 32 (M) | 30.8 (F) 30.6 (M) | 47 (F) 36 (M) |
Overall body shape | dombensis-like | dombensis-like | dombensis-like | dombensis-like | dombensis-like | dombensis-like | dombensis-like | vertebralis-like |
Parotoid glands | Conspicuous, flattened, kidney-shaped | Conspicuous, elevated | Conspicuous, elevated, curved outer edge, kidney-shaped, thinner or same width of eye ⌀ | Conspicuous, elevated | Conspicuous, elevated | Inconspicuous | Inconspicuous | Inconspicuous, flattenned |
Tympanum | Not visible | Not visible | Visible or not visible, less than half eye ⌀ | Not visible | Visible, much smaller than eye ⌀ | Not visible or visible | Not visible | Visible, ¾ of eye ⌀ |
Columella | Absent | Absent | Present | Absent | n/a | Present | n/a | Present |
Neopalatine | Approaching or synostosed to pterygoid and sphenethmoid | Approaching or synostosed to sphenethmoid, approaching maxilla and pterygoid | Approaching sphenethmoid, maxilla, and pterygoid | Reduced | n/a | Well-developed | n/a | Well-developed |
Dorsal skin | Very rough | Rough | Rough | Rough | Very rough, spiny | Leathery | Rough | Rough |
Skin on dorsal head | Rough | Rough | Rough | Rough | Rough | Smooth | Rough | Rough |
Skin on snout | Rough | Rough | Rough | Rough | Smooth | Smooth | Smooth | Rough |
Skin on venter | Granular | Granular | Granular | Granular | Granular | Smooth to slightly granular | Granular | Granular |
Vertebral line | Absent | Absent | Absent | Absent | Absent | Usually absent | Absent | Absent |
Dorsal coloration | Variation substrate-related. Shades of beige, grey, orange (bright to brick), green (coral to dark), brown on females. Breeding males plain bright yellow. Pale blotches as follows: occipital, mid-dorsal, sacral and above arm insertion. | Shades of beige, brown, grey and dark green. Breeding males with yellowish flanks. Pale blotches as follows: occipital, mid-dorsal, sacral and above arm insertion. | Shades of beige, brown, grey and orange. Pale blotches as follows: occipital, mid-dorsal, sacral and above arm insertion. Occipital and mid-dorsal blotches usually fused, resembling hourglass shape. | Shades of brown (dark to coppery) and grey. Pale blotches as follows: occipital, mid-dorsal, and sacral, and above arm insertion. | Black bands on pale brownish ground color. | Brown to reddish-brown, with light and dark paired markings. | Irregular black and red blotches on a grey background. | Pale-yellowish grey with black speckles, each with a light center, resulting in a pepper-and-salt effect. |
Ventral coloration | Pale thin speckles in females, nearly immaculate in males | Dark thick speckles in females, less, paler speckles in males | Nearly immaculate. Median line of black speckles on chest, short black line in front of arms insertion | Immaculate or with speckles | Creamy white, throat yellowish. Interrupted median line of black blotches from chest to hind limbs. | Immaculate, yellowish-white | Creamy white | Cream colored, black speckles in belly |
Webbing on toes | Absent or vestigial. Margin not serrated | Ranging between vestigial to first phalange of toe IV free of web. Margin not serrated | Vestigial. Margin not serrated | Toes without margin of web. Webbing vestigial. Margin not serrated | Vestigial. Margin not serrated | Toes with margin of web. Two phalanges of toe III free of web. Margin serrated | Vestigial. Margin not serrated | 3 phalanges of toe IV free of webbing. Margin n/a |
Subarticular tubercles | Usually double at base of finger IV. Usually single at base of digits, usually double or bilobate at joint between phalanges | Always single at base of finger IV. Usually single at base of digits, usually double or bilobate at joint between phalanges | Usually single at base of digits, usually double or bilobate at joint between phalanges | Double | Double | Usually single at base of digits, double or absent at joint between phalanges | Single on fingers, except on finger I, where it is double. Double on toes | Double |
Metatarsal tubercles | Oval or diamond-shaped, inner often very pointy. Inner ranging from slightly longer to twice the length of outer | Oval, inner often very pointy. Inner same size to almost twice longer than outer | Both oval, outer between half and two thirds the length of inner | Inner three times larger than outer | Outer about ⅔ the size of inner | Inner same size or smaller than outer | Outer about ⅔ the size of inner | Outer and inner large, smooth and flat |
Metacarpal tubercles | Outer larger than inner, inner often absent | Outer larger than inner, inner very reduced, sometimes absent | Outer rounded to triangular, shorter than inner | Inner four times smaller than outer | Outer larger than inner | Inner absent | Two large flat metacarpal tubercles, outer larger than inner | Inner and outer present |
Distribution | Angola | Angola | Angola | Angola | Mozambique, Zimbabwe | Namibia | Namibia | Ethiopia, Kenya, Somalia |
Habitat | Rocky outcrops in moist forest and secondary Miombo | Rocky outcrops in montane grasslands | Rocky outcrops in montane grasslands | Rocky outcrops in woodlands | Montane grasslands | Rocky outcrops in arid areas | Rocky outcrops in arid areas | Arid savanna |
P. damaranus | P. dombensis | P. fenoulheti | P. grandisonae | P. beiranus | P. kavangensis | P. parkeri | P. vertebralis | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Max SVL (mm) | 37.8 (?) | 41.1 (F) 39.1 (M) | 45 (F) 38 (M) | 46 (F) 32.9 (M) | 28 (F) 20 (M) | 33 (F) 30 (M) | 35 (F) 31 (M) | 36 (F) 30 (M) |
Overall body shape | dombensis-like | dombensis-like | dombensis-like | dombensis-like | vertebralis-like | vertebralis-like | vertebralis-like | vertebralis-like |
Parotoid glands | Conspicuous, flattened, outer edge can be almost straight | Inconspicuous to conspicuous, flattened | Inconspicuous to conspicuous, elevated, wider than eye ⌀ | Inconspicuous to hardly discernible | Inconspicuous to conspicuous, curved outline, usually broken into discontinuous patches | Inconspicuous to conspicuous, flattened, outer edge almost straight | Inconspicuous, flattened | Inconspicuous, flattened |
Tympanum | Not visible or visible, ⌀ ≤ half eye ⌀ | Visible, ⌀ < internarial distance | Visible, more than half eye ⌀, ⌀ < internarial distance | Very conspicuous, ⌀ ≥ internarial distance | Conspicuous to hardly visible | Visible | Not visible to visible, ⌀ half eye ⌀ | Conspicuous, ⌀ more than half eye ⌀ |
Columella | Present | Present | Present | Present | Present | Present | Present | Present |
Neopalatine | Well-developed | Approaching but not in contact with sphenethmoid, maxilla, and pterygoid | Not articulated with sphenetmoid or maxilla | Not articulated with maxilla | Well-developed | Well-developed | Well-developed | Sometimes absent. Not articulated with sphenetmoid |
Dorsal skin | Rough | Rough | Leathery | Leathery | Rough | Very rough | Rough | Rough |
Skin on dorsal head | Rough | Rough | Rough | Smooth | Rough | Rough | Rough | Smooth |
Skin on snout | Rough | Smooth | Rough | Smooth | Smooth | Smooth | Smooth | Smooth |
Skin on venter | Granular | Smooth to slightly granular | Smooth to slightly granular | Smooth to slightly granular | Granular | Granular | Smooth to slightly granular | Smooth to slightly granular |
Vertebral line | Usually absent | Usually absent | Usually absent | Absent | Usually present | Present | Absent | Usually absent |
Dorsal coloration | Green or olive-brown, symmetrical to irregular dark blotches. Pale grey blotches as follows: above snout, occipital, mid-dorsal, above arm insertion. | Shades of brown, grey or green, sometimes with red warts. Pale blotches as follows: occipital, mid-dorsal, and sacral, and above arm insertion. | Variation substrate-related. Light grey to brown, with dark blotches, sometimes red warts. Pale blotches as follows: scapular, sometimes mid-dorsal (single or paired). | Light-grey to brown. Pale blotches as follows: occipital, mid-dorsal, and sacral. | Olive brown, black or reddish-brown blotches. Dark dorsal markings: V-shaped interorbital bar, paired blotches arranged symmetrically. | Grey ground color with black blotches and brick orange warts. Dark interorbital bar, pale scapular patch with projections onto eyelids. | Variation substrate-related. Light grey to dark brown, with scattered dark blotches, and ochraceous to brownish red warts. | Grey to brown with paired dark, orange or reddish markings, pale. |
Ventral coloration | Immaculate. Males with yellow throat | Immaculate | Usually immaculate, rarely with dark speckles in midline of pectoral region. Males with yellow or orange throat | Immaculate | Lightly to heavily speckled on grey, tending to merge in midline | Immaculate, cream-colored | Immaculate, white. Males with cream-colored throat | Black blotches that tend to fuse. Males with yellow throat |
Webbing on toes | Moderate, 3 to 3.5 phalanges of toe IV free of web. Margin n/a | Toes without or with very narrow web margin. Webbing between toes III and IV beyond base of proximal phalange of toe IV. Margin not to slightly serrated | Broad to vestigial webbing between toes III and IV. Margin not serrated | Toes without web margin. Webbing vestigial. Margin not serrated | Broad webbing between toes III and IV. Margin serrated | Broad webbing between toes III and IV. Margin serrated | Vestigial, reaching the base of toe IV. Margin serrated | Two phalanges of toe III free of web. Margin not serrated |
Subarticular tubercles | Usually double | Usually single at base of digits, usually double at joint between finger phalanges. At least distal of toes III and IV are double | Single or double at the base of digits and at joint between phalanges | Single, except distal tubercle of third finger, which is double or bilobed | Usually double | Usually double at base of digits and at joint between phalanges | Usually single at base of digits, usually double at joint between phalanges | Usually single at base of digits, double or absent at joint between phalanges |
Metatarsal tubercles | Inner larger than outer | Inner smaller than outer | Inner larger than outer | Inner larger than outer | Inner absent | Inner two to three times larger than outer | Very reduced, rounded. Inner same size or smaller than outer | Inner two to three times larger than outer |
Metacarpal tubercles | n/a | Inner smaller than outer | Inner smaller than outer | Outer two thirds to same size of inner | Inner usually absent, small when present | Inner rounded, smaller than outer rounded to triangular-shaped | Inner usually absent, very small when present, outer rounded | Inner much smaller than outer |
Distribution | Namibia | Angola, Namibia | Botswana, Mozambique, Namibia, South Africa, Zimbabwe | Angola | Malawi, Mozambique, Zambia | Angola, Botswana, Namibia, Zambia, Zimbabwe | Kenya, Tanzania | South Africa, Botswana |
Habitat | Arid grasslands | Rocky outcrops in arid areas | Rocky outcrops in grasslands and woodlands | Rocky outcrops in arid areas | Savanna and grasslands | Grasslands in sandy areas | Open savanna | Rocky outcrops in arid grasslands and savanna |
Summarized measurements of Angolan Poyntonophrynus specimens examined in this study are provided in Table
Morphometric comparisons of Angolan Poyntonophrynus. Boxplots (top whisker–maximum value; lower whisker–minimum value; dark horizontal line–median; box–1st quartile – 1.5 interquartile range (IQR), and 3rd quartile + 1.5 IQR) comparing morphometric features. A SVL, and ratios B SVL/TL, C SVL/FLL, D SVL/HL between Poyntonophrynus species, left to right: P. cf. fernandae (lineage A, green), P. fernandae sp. nov. (lineage B, blue), P. nambensis sp. nov. (lineage C, red), and P. pachnodes (yellow), the closest related species. For each species, the darker shade (on the left) represents females, and the lighter shade (on the right) represents males. Note sexual size dimorphism in all species, except in P. pachnodes (but compare text). SVL = snout‒vent length.
Comparative table of measurements of adult males and females of Poyntonophrynus pachnodes, P. fernandae sp. nov., P. cf. fernandae, and P. nambensis sp. nov. Values are average ± standard deviation with range provided in square brackets. For abbreviations of measurements see Methods section. M—male, F—female.
Species | P. fernandae sp. nov. (lineage B) | P. fernandae sp. nov. (lineage B) | P. cf. fernandae (lineage A) | P. cf. fernandae (lineage A) | P. nambensis sp. nov. (lineage C) | P. nambensis sp. nov. (lineage C) | P. pachnodes | P. pachnodes |
Sex | F | M | F | M | F | M | F | M |
n | 4 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 6 | 3 | 4 |
SVL | 29.2 ± 0.6 [28.5–29.9] | 25.8 | 31.2 ± 0.8 [30.3–31.8] | 24.1 ± 0.2 [23.9–24.2] | 32.1 ± 1.5 [30.2–34.9] | 25.3 ± 1.0 [24.2–26.5] | 29.9 ± 1.7 [28–31.4] | 30.4 ± 3.0 [26.5–33.7] |
HW | 9.9 ± 0.5 [9.1–10.3] | 9.5 | 9.9 ± 0.1 [9.8–10] | 8.6 ± 0.7 [8.1–9.1] | 11.0 ± 0.5 [10.2–11.7] | 9.4 ± 0.6 [9–10.6] | 9.7 ± 0.4 [9.2–9.9] | 9.6 ± 0.7 [8.6–10.3] |
HL | 7.8 ± 0.4 [7.2–8.1] | 7.7 | 7.7 ± 0.3 [7.4–7.9] | 7.3 ± 0.4 [7–7.5] | 7.9 ± 0.4 [7.2–8.5] | 7.2 ± 0.4 [6.8–7.9] | 8.6 ± 0.6 [7.9–9.1] | 9.3 ± 2.2 [6.9–11.7] |
IOD | 3 ± 0.4 [2.5–3.5] | 2.6 | 2.2 ± 0.3 [1.8–2.4] | 2.4 ± 0.3 [2.2–2.6] | 2.6 ± 0.3 [2–3] | 2.4 ± 0.2 [2–2.6] | 2.9 ± 0.6 [2.2–3.3] | 3.7 ± 0.8 [2.7–4.5] |
ED | 2.9 ± 0.2 [2.8–3.2] | 2.8 | 2.6 ± 0.1 [2.6–2.7] | 2.6 ± 0.3 [2.4–2.8] | 3.1 ± 0.3 [2.9–3.5] | 2.8 ± 0.2 [2.5–3.1] | 2.7 ± 0.2 [2.5–2.9] | 2.8 ± 0.3 [2.4–3] |
IND | 2.1 ± 0.1 [1.9–2.2] | 1.9 | 2.0 ± 0.1 [2–2.1] | 2.1 ± 0.0 [2.1–2.1] | 2.1 ± 0.1 [1.9–2.3] | 1.9 ± 0.2 [1.7–2.2] | 2.0 ± 0.1 [1.9–2.1] | 2.2 ± 0.3 [1.8–2.5] |
END | 2.4 ± 0.1 [2.2–2.5] | 2.1 | 2.5 ± 0.2 [2.3–2.6] | 2.3 ± 0.1 [2.2–2.3] | 2.4 ± 0.2 [2.1–2.8] | 2.2 ± 0.1 [2.1–2.4] | 2.5 ± 0.2 [2.2–2.6] | 2.5 ± 0.3 [2.2–2.8] |
UEW | 2.4 ± 0.3 [2–2.6] | 1.9 | 2.0 ± 0.1 [1.9–2.1] | 2.3 ± 0.4 [2–2.6] | 2.4 ± 0.3 [1.9–2.9] | 2.2 ± 0.4 [1.7–2.7] | 2.6 ± 0.5 [2–2.9] | 2.2 ± 0.2 [2–2.4] |
SL | 3.9 ± 0.3 [3.6–4.2] | 3.3 | 3.7 ± 0.2 [3.6–3.9] | 3.4 ± 0.2 [3.2–3.5] | 3.7 ± 0.3 [3.2–4.1] | 3.3 ± 0.2 [3.1–3.6] | 4.0 ± 0.5 [3.5–4.5] | 3.8 ± 0.2 [3.6–4] |
NS | 1.4 ± 0.1 [1.3–1.4] | 1.1 | 1.3 ± 0.1 [1.2–1.4] | 1.2 ± 0 [1.2–1.2] | 1.4 ± 0.1 [1.3–1.7] | 1.2 ± 0.2 [1–1.6] | 1.4 ± 0.3 [1.2–1.7] | 1.5 ± 0.2 [1.3–1.8] |
THL | 12.5 ± 0.4 [12.1–13] | 11.0 | 11.3 ± 0.2 [11.2–11.5] | 10.4 ± 0.5 [10–10.7] | 11.1 ± 0.8 [9.6–12] | 10.1 ± 0.6 [9.2–10.9] | 11.4 ± 0.2 [11.2–11.6] | 11.5 ± 1.3 [10.1–13] |
TL | 11.8 ± 0.5 [11.1–12.2] | 11.4 | 11.7 ± 0.3 [11.3–11.9] | 10.7 ± 0.4 [10.4–10.9] | 10.8 ± 0.4 [10.4–11.5] | 9.5 ± 0.6 [8.9–10.4] | 11.3 ± 0.6 [10.7–11.7] | 11.8 ± 1.1 [10.1–12.5] |
FL | 10.8 ± 1 [10–12.1] | 10.1 | 10.9 ± 0.6 [10.2–11.4] | 9.5 ± 0.6 [9–9.9] | 10.6 ± 0.5 [9.6–11.1] | 9.6 ± 0.7 [8.3–10.3] | 11.4 ± 0.6 [10.8–11.8] | 11.7 ± 1.0 [10.3–12.5] |
Toe4L | 5.7 ± 0.2 [5.6–6] | 5.1 | 5.7 ± 0.5 [5.3–6.2] | 4.9 ± 0.2 [4.7–5] | 5.4 ± 0.5 [4.8–6.1] | 4.8 ± 0.3 [4.4–5.2] | 5.8 ± 1.0 [4.8–6.7] | 6.5 ± 1.2 [5–7.7] |
FLL | 7.1 ± 0.3 [6.8–7.5] | 6.7 | 6.8 ± 0.4 [6.5–7.2] | 5.8 ± 0.3 [5.6–6] | 6.5 ± 0.3 [6.1–7] | 5.8 ± 0.6 [5.3–6.9] | 6.8 ± 0.3 [6.6–7.2] | 6.7 ± 0.8 [6–7.8] |
HAL | 6.4 ± 0.6 [5.5–6.9] | 5.6 | 6.9 ± 0.4 [6.6–7.3] | 5.5 ± 0.2 [5.3–5.6] | 6.4 ± 0.4 [5.6–6.8] | 5.3 ± 0.4 [4.8–5.8] | 6.9 ± 0.6 [6.3–7.4] | 6.9 ± 0.6 [6–7.4] |
Fin3L | 3.4 ± 0.4 [3–3.8] | 3.4 | 3.6 ± 0.2 [3.4–3.7] | 2.8 ± 0.1 [2.7–2.9] | 3.2 ± 0.3 [2.8–3.6] | 2.5 ± 0.3 [2.2–3] | 4.4 ± 0.2 [4.2–4.6] | 4.4 ± 0.6 [3.5–4.9] |
All recently collected specimens showed the typical Poyntonophrynus dorsal color pattern, as described by
Females of the new Angolan Poyntonophrynus lineages detected in this study in (A) dorsal, and (B) ventral view. Left to right: P. fernandae sp. nov. (lineage B,
The postcranial skeletons of the recently collected Angolan specimens were very similar to P. pachnodes, the only other Poyntonophrynus species for which detailed postcranial osteological information is available (
Cranium osteology of Angolan female Poyntonophrynus. A–H Left to right: skulls of P. dombensis (
CT-scan reconstructions of arms of male Poyntonophrynus. Left to right: P. pachnodes (UF 184183), P. cf. fernandae (lineage A) (
The three newly recovered lineages were found in association with large boulders (Fig.
Poyntonophrynus habitats. A, B Habitat of P. fernandae sp. nov. at Congulo forest, Cuanza-Sul Province. C, D Habitat of P. cf. fernandae and P. nambensis sp. nov. at Namba highlands, Cuanza-Sul Province. E, F Habitat of P. pachnodes at Serra da Neve, Namibe Province. Photos by K. Luchansky (A) and W.R. Branch (D).
Based on mitochondrial and nuclear DNA, morphological, and osteological differences, and the geographic distribution of the new lineages discussed above, we recognized three distinct lineages. However, as clade A+B has only small distances in the 16S mitochondrial gene between the two lineages that it comprises, we describe two new species, Poyntonophrynus fernandae sp. nov. (lineage B) and Poyntonophrynus nambensis sp. nov. (lineage C), and provisionally regard lineage A as conspecific with lineage B. In order to make future use of our data easier, and to avoid potential taxonomic confusion, the type series of P. fernandae sp. nov. did not include specimens of lineage A, which we refered to as additional material with uncertain species identity (P. cf. fernandae). We follow the general lineage-based species concept (
Photographic record of lineage B (Fig.
We restrict the type series of P. fernandae sp. nov. to specimens from the escarpment forest and adjacent areas (lineage B). The vouchers from Namba were listed and reported herein as additional referred material of P. cf. fernandae (lineage A):
Measurements (in mm) of the type series of Poyntonophrynus fernandae sp. nov. (lineage B), and the additional vouchers of P. cf. fernandae (lineage A). For abbreviations see Methods section. M—male, F—female.
Current catalogue number |
|
BMNH 2021.7534 |
|
BMNH 2021.7535 | FKH–1086 |
|
|
CHL 0455 | BMNH 2021.7536 | FKH–0463 |
Former catalogue number | CHL 0806 | CHL 0431 | CHL 0805 | — | — | FKH–0461 | CHL 0454 | — | FKH–0459 | — |
Field number | NB806 | NB431 | NB805 | EI_704 | EI_725 | P0–36 | NB454 | NB455 | P0–34 | P0–38 |
Type status | Holotype | Paratype | Paratype | Paratype | Paratype | additional voucher | additional voucher | additional voucher | additional voucher | additional voucher |
Sex | F | F | M | F | F | F | M | M | F | F |
SVL | 29.4 | 29.1 | 25.8 | 29.9 | 28.5 | 31.8 | 24.2 | 23.9 | 31.6 | 30.3 |
HW | 10.3 | 10.0 | 9.5 | 10.1 | 9.1 | 9.8 | 8.1 | 9.1 | 9.8 | 10 |
HL | 8.1 | 8.0 | 7.7 | 7.7 | 7.2 | 7.8 | 7.0 | 7.5 | 7.9 | 7.4 |
IOD | 3.5 | 3.0 | 2.6 | 2.9 | 2.5 | 1.8 | 2.6 | 2.2 | 2.4 | 2.3 |
ED | 2.9 | 2.8 | 2.8 | 3.2 | 2.8 | 2.6 | 2.4 | 2.8 | 2.7 | 2.6 |
IND | 2.1 | 1.9 | 1.9 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 2.0 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 2.0 |
END | 2.4 | 2.2 | 2.1 | 2.5 | 2.3 | 2.6 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.5 |
UEW | 2.0 | 2.6 | 1.9 | 2.5 | 2.5 | 1.9 | 2.0 | 2.6 | 2.0 | 2.1 |
SL | 4.1 | 3.6 | 3.3 | 4.2 | 3.8 | 3.7 | 3.5 | 3.2 | 3.9 | 3.6 |
NS | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.1 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.4 | 1.3 |
THL | 12.4 | 12.1 | 11 | 13.0 | 12.4 | 11.2 | 10.0 | 10.7 | 11.5 | 11.3 |
TL | 11.9 | 12.0 | 11.4 | 12.2 | 11.1 | 11.3 | 10.9 | 10.4 | 11.9 | 11.8 |
TaL | 5.9 | 6.4 | 5.6 | 6.8 | 5.9 | 6.2 | 5.4 | 6.4 | 6.3 | 7.0 |
FL | 11.0 | 12.1 | 10.1 | 10.0 | 10.2 | 10.2 | 9.0 | 9.9 | 11.4 | 11.2 |
Toe4L | 6.0 | 5.7 | 5.1 | 5.6 | 5.6 | 5.3 | 4.7 | 5.0 | 6.2 | 5.7 |
IMTL | 1.5 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.5 | 1.2 |
UAL | 5.2 | 5.8 | 5.0 | 4.8 | 4.7 | 5.3 | 5.2 | 5.0 | 4.9 | 5.4 |
FLL | 7.0 | 7.5 | 6.7 | 6.8 | 7.1 | 6.8 | 6.0 | 5.6 | 7.2 | 6.5 |
HAL | 6.7 | 6.9 | 5.6 | 6.5 | 5.5 | 6.6 | 5.6 | 5.3 | 7.3 | 6.7 |
Fin3L | 3.8 | 3.6 | 3.4 | 3.2 | 3.0 | 3.4 | 2.9 | 2.7 | 3.6 | 3.7 |
Poyntonophrynus fernandae sp. nov. sensu lato are medium-sized pygmy toads with females larger than males, sexual dimorphism in skin texture (females rougher than males), and sexual dichromatism (females with complex dorsal patterns vs. males plain or partially bright yellow; females with speckles ventrally vs. males with nearly immaculate venter). No tarsal fold. Subarticular tubercles at the base of fingers and toes mostly single, and those at the joint between phalanges usually double. Tympanum not visible. Conspicuous parotoid glands, with curved outer edge. Usually two phalanges of toes III and V free of web, webbing between toes III and IV vestigial, not serrated. One or two enlarged palmar tubercles: one large, rounded to triangular-shaped very well developed outer metacarpal tubercle, and one smaller rounded inner metacarpal tubercle sometimes absent. Females with typical Poyntonophrynus arrangement of dorsal coloration pattern: pale single occipital, mid-dorsal, sacral and above arm insertion blotches.
Specimens of P. cf. fernandae (lineage A) differ from those of P. fernandae sp. nov. (lineage B) in shape of parotoid glands (elevated vs. flattened), conspicuousness of dorsal glandular warts (evident vs. discrete), dorsal coloration (dull vs. complex, colorful, in different shades of orange, green and black), ventral coloration (dark thick speckles vs. pale thin speckles), relative width of dark cross-bands on the limbs (similar width than pale ones and dull vs. much wider than pale ones, and orange on the outer surface of the limbs), inner metacarpal tubercle (conspicuous and always present vs. discrete and sometimes absent), overall sturdiness (sturdy vs. slender), relative limb size (short vs. long). Males differ from males of P. fernandae sp. nov. (lineage B) in dorsal coloration (dull coloration with similar pattern than females, but partially with yellow on flanks and thighs vs. plain bright yellow).
Poyntonophrynus fernandae sp. nov. sensu lato differs from all Poyntonophrynus species except P. pachnodes in lacking a tympanum and a columella. It differs from P. pachnodes in having a better-developed neopalatine. Males differ from P. pachnodes and P. nambensis sp. nov. in dorsal coloration (partially or plain bright yellow vs. complex dull patterns in P. pachnodes, and P. nambensis sp. nov.). It differs from P. nambensis sp. nov. in being smaller, less sturdy, and having relatively longer fore and hindlimbs, in ventral coloration (speckles vs. nearly immaculate). It differs from P. beiranus in parotoid glands conspicuousness (conspicuous, with clearly demarcated margins vs. inconspicuous). It differs from P. damaranus in ventral patterning (speckles vs. immaculate). It differs from P. dombensis in tympanum (not visible vs. conspicuous), and ventral patterning (speckles vs. immaculate). It differs from P. fenoulheti in parotoid glands width (thinner or around same width of eye diameter vs. wider than eye diameter). It differs from P. grandisonae in tympanum (not visible vs. conspicuous) and skin texture (rough vs. leathery). It differs from P. grindleyi in pale occipital and sacral patches (present vs. absent) and dorsal spines (small vs. large). It differs from P. hoeschi in ventral patterning (speckles vs. immaculate). It differs from P. jordani in shape of parotoid glands (kidney-shaped vs. a cluster of glands) and pale occipital patch (present vs. absent). It differs from P. lughensis in conspicuousness of parotoid glands (conspicuous vs. inconspicuous) and tympanum (not visible vs. conspicuous). It differs from P. kavangensis in foot webbing (non-serrated vs. serrated), dorsal patterning (absent vertebral line vs. present), and ventral patterning (speckles vs. immaculate). It differs from P. parkeri in ventral patterning (speckles vs. immaculate). It differs from P. vertebralis in dorsal patterning (vertebral line absent vs. present), and conspicuousness of parotoid glands (conspicuous vs. inconspicuous).
External morphology. Small (SVL 29.4 mm), slender, gravid female (Figs
Pictures of live Poyntonophrynus fernandae sp. nov. A Female holotype (
Dorsal skin rough, texture resembling sandpaper, with pale-tipped conical spines on dorsum, arms, legs, and lateral surface of snout. Skin of top of head smooth. Ventral and gular skin, and skin of ventral surface of limbs covered in minuscule spines, less pronounced and pointy than dorsal ones. Skin of venter and gular region granular. Parotoid glands elongated, flattened, conspicuous, with clearly discernible margins, kidney-shaped, with a curved outer margin, placed dorsolaterally and extending from behind the eye to slightly beyond forearm insertion. Poorly developed glandular warts around mid-dorsal pale patch.
Color. In life, dorsal coloration consists of a set of black and paler (mostly beige) blotches, forming a symmetrical pattern (Fig.
Osteology
(Fig.
CT-scan of Poyntonophrynus fernandae sp. nov. female holotype (
Eight distinct, procoelous, non-imbricating and not synostosed presacral vertebrae. Atlas without transverse processes, with widely separated cotyles. Sacrum procoelous with laterally expanded transverse processes, bearing expanded diapophyses. Urostyle long and thin, with weakly developed dorsal ridge on proximal half, and bicondylar articulation with sacrum. Firmisternal pectoral girdle, with widely spaced and slender coracoids. Clavicles slender, nearly reaching one another. Scapulae stout, directed laterally but strongly curving dorsally at their lateral extent. No visible ossified sternum or omosternum. Pelvic girdle comprising ilium, pubis, and ischium. Shaft of ilium long and slender, without dorsal crest. Radioulna shorter than humerus. Humerus bearing ventral crest on proximal half, and without medial and lateral crests. Phalangeal formula for manus 2–2–3–3. A single ossified prepollex. Tips of terminal manual phalanges weakly expanded into small knobs. Tibiofibula longer than femur. Phalangeal formula for pes 2–2–3–4–3. A single ossified prehallux. Tips of terminal pedal phalanges weakly expanded as in fingers.
Male (SVL 25.8 mm) smaller than females (28.5–29.9 mm). Male with nuptial pads consisting of a dense cover of minute dark asperities on upper and inner surfaces of finger I and to a lesser extent on the upper medial surface of finger II and inner metacarpal tubercle, absent on females. Male without spines on dorsum or venter, present on females. Male bright plain yellow, different from elaborate dorsal pattern on females.
Measurements of the type series are presented in Table
Dorsal pale markings in life show some differences in shape, extent, and considerable variation in color intensity between type series and holotype. This seems to be at least to some degree substrate-related, and individual toads can apparently change coloration intensity (to darker, brighter, or paler shades of each tone). The shape of the pale dorsal blotches on the paratype females is similar to the typical Poyntonophrynus arrangement (e.g. Fig.
Male’s (
P. cf. fernandae (lineage A) (Figs
CT-scan of Poyntonophrynus cf. fernandae (lineage A) (
All analyzed specimens (
All specimens were collected in the rainy season. Poyntonophrynus fernandae sp. nov. (lineage B)
Poyntonophrynus cf. fernandae (lineage A) from Chinhundo, in Namba region, differed in some respects from P. fernandae sp. nov. (lineage B). Two males were collected in November 2016, while active during the day and after heavy rains, showing partially yellow-greenish coloration (Fig.
P. fernandae sp. nov. sensu stricto. The species is known from the Angolan central escarpment zone in the region of Gabela, and extending eastwards at least to Quibala, in Cuanza-Sul province, at elevations of 520–1303 m a.s.l. (Fig.
The specific epithet fernandae (Pt.) is a tribute to Fernanda Lages, a researcher and professor of Genetics based in Lubango, Angola. Her continuous investment in capacity building over the last decades and dedication to various research projects and international collaborations gave opportunities and transformed the professional paths of several young Angolan biologists, and thus of research in Biology in the country. The name, built in the feminine singular genitive, also pays homage to women in science. We suggest “Fernanda’s pygmy toad” and “sapo pigmeu da Fernanda” as English and Portuguese common names, respectively.
CHL 0326, BMNH 2021.7538, BMNH 2021.7539, 3 females, same data as holotype; BMNH 2021.7540,
A medium-sized pygmy toad with females larger and rougher than males. No tarsal fold. Subarticular tubercles at the base of fingers and toes usually single, remaining ones, located at the joint between phalanges, usually double. Tympanum varies between visible and not visible. Conspicuous protuberant parotoid glands, with curved outer edge. Very conspicuous dorsal glandular warts. Usually 1.75 phalanges of toes III and V free of web, webbing between toes III and IV vestigial, not serrated. Two enlarged well-developed palmar tubercles: large, rounded to triangular-shaped outer metacarpal tubercle, and smaller oval inner metacarpal tubercle. Typical Poyntonophrynus dorsal coloration: one pale occipital blotch, one mid-dorsal blotch, one sacral blotch, and one pale blotch over arm insertion. In most individuals, the occipital and mid-dorsal pale blotches are connected in the vertebral area, resembling an hourglass shape only observed in this species. Dorsal coloration identical in both sexes, generally dull, varying in shades of grey, beige and brown with some traces of brick orange and dark brown. Dark cross-bands on limbs around the same width as pale interspaces.
Poyntonophrynus nambensis sp. nov. differs from P. pachnodes and P. fernandae sp. nov. sensu lato in having a columella. It differs from P. pachnodes in having a better-developed neopalatine. Differs from P. fernandae sp. nov. sensu lato in ventral patterning (few speckles along midline of chest, and dark line in front of arm insertion vs. scattered speckles at least on the chest), and dorsal coloration (dorsal pale hourglass-shaped blotch almost always present vs. absent), and breeding male coloration (dulls, similar to females vs. partially or completely bright yellow). It differs from P. beiranus in parotoid glands conspicuousness (conspicuous, elevated, with clearly demarcated margins vs. inconspicuous), and dorsal patterning (vertebral line absent vs. present). It differs from P. damaranus in ventral patterning (few dark speckles along midline of chest, and dark line in front of arm insertion vs. immaculate). It differs from P. dombensis in tympanum size (when visible, between 0.5 and 0.6 times internarial distance, vs. conspicuous and around 0.7 times internarial distance), and ventral patterning (few speckles along midline of chest, and dark line in front of arm insertion vs. immaculate). It differs from P. fenoulheti in parotoid glands width (thinner or around same width of eye diameter vs. wider than eye diameter). It differs from P. grandisonae in tympanum size (when visible, between 0.5 and 0.6 times internarial distance, vs. same width or wider than internarial distance) and skin texture (rough vs. leathery). It differs from P. grindleyi in pale occipital and sacral patches (present vs. absent), dorsal spines (small vs. large), and ventral coloration (few dark speckles along midline of chest, and dark line in front of arm insertion vs. dark thick ventral marbling). It differs from P. hoeschi in ventral patterning (few speckles along midline of chest, and dark line in front of arm insertion vs. immaculate). It differs from P. jordani in shape of parotoid glands (kidney-shaped vs. a cluster of glands) and pale occipital patch (present vs. absent). It differs from P. lughensis in conspicuousness of parotoid glands (conspicuous vs. inconspicuous). It differs from P. kavangensis in foot webbing (non-serrated vs. serrated), dorsal patterning (absent vertebral line vs. present), and ventral patterning (few speckles along midline of chest, and dark line in front of arm insertion vs. immaculate). It differs from P. parkeri in development of parotoid glands (elevated vs. flattened). It differs from P. vertebralis in dorsal patterning (absent vertebral line vs. present), ventral patterning (few speckles along midline of chest, and dark line in front of arm insertion vs. distinct thick dark blotches), and conspicuousness of parotoid glands (conspicuous vs. inconspicuous).
External morphology. Small (SVL 31.9 mm), robust gravid female (Fig.
Pictures of live Poyntonophrynus nambensis sp. nov. A Female paratype (FKH-0458) with greyish coloration. B, C Female holotype (
Measurements (in mm) of type series of Poyntonophrynus nambensis sp. nov. (lineage C). For abbreviations see Methods section. M—male, F—female, U—unidentified.
Current catalogue number |
|
CHL 0326 | BMNH 2021.7538 | BMNH 2021.7539 | BMNH 2021.7540 |
|
FKH-0377 | FKH-0378 | FKH-0379 | FKH-0380 | FKH-0381 | FKH-0457 | FKH-0458 |
|
FKH-0462 |
Former catalogue number | CHL 0456 | — | CHL 0327 | CHL 0328 | CHL 0329 | CHL 0457 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | FKH-0460 | — |
Field number | NB456 | NB326 | NB327 | NB328 | NB329 | NB457 | JLRZC0027 | JLRZC0028 | JLRZC0029 | JLRZC0030 | JLRZC0031 | P0-32 | P0-33 | P0-35 | P0-37 |
Type status | Holotype | Paratype | Paratype | Paratype | Paratype | Paratype | Paratype | Paratype | Paratype | Paratype | Paratype | Paratype | Paratype | Paratype | Paratype |
Sex | F | F | F | F | M | M | U | M | M | M | M | F | F | F | F |
SVL | 31.9 | 30.2 | 30.7 | 31.7 | 24.2 | 26.5 | 26.4 | 24.4 | 25.0 | 26.4 | 25.0 | 32.9 | 33.4 | 34.9 | 31.3 |
HW | 11.0 | 10.6 | 11.4 | 11.1 | 9.1 | 10.6 | 9.2 | 9.0 | 9.0 | 9.6 | 9.1 | 10.7 | 11 | 11.7 | 10.2 |
HL | 8.1 | 7.8 | 8.5 | 8.1 | 7.1 | 7.9 | 6.7 | 7.3 | 6.8 | 7.1 | 6.9 | 7.7 | 7.2 | 8.2 | 7.6 |
IOD | 3.0 | 2.6 | 2.5 | 2.7 | 2.0 | 2.6 | 1.9 | 2.2 | 2.4 | 2.6 | 2.4 | 2.3 | 2.5 | 2.9 | 2.0 |
TDH | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | — | 1.1 | 1.1 | — | — | — | — | — | 1.2 | — | — | 1.1 |
ED | 3.5 | 3.2 | 3.5 | 3.1 | 2.9 | 3.1 | 2.8 | 2.8 | 2.8 | 2.6 | 2.5 | 2.9 | 2.9 | 3.0 | 2.9 |
IND | 2.2 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 2.1 | 2.0 | 2.2 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.9 | 1.7 | 2.2 | 2.1 | 2.3 | 1.9 |
END | 2.7 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.5 | 2.1 | 2.4 | 2.5 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 2.1 | 2.3 | 2.8 | 2.4 |
UEW | 2.3 | 2.5 | 2.9 | 2.8 | 2.7 | 2.7 | 1.8 | 2.0 | 1.7 | 2.3 | 2.0 | 2.2 | 2.4 | 1.9 | 2.3 |
SL | 3.4 | 4.0 | 4.1 | 3.8 | 3.6 | 3.5 | 3.2 | 3.3 | 3.1 | 3.2 | 3.1 | 3.7 | 3.5 | 4.1 | 3.2 |
NS | 1.3 | 1.6 | 1.4 | 1.7 | 1.4 | 1.6 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.4 |
THL | 11.3 | 12 | 11.9 | 11.2 | 9.9 | 10.9 | 9.7 | 10 | 10.5 | 9.9 | 9.2 | 9.6 | 10.8 | 11.7 | 10.5 |
TL | 10.9 | 10.6 | 11.4 | 10.4 | 9.7 | 10.4 | 9.7 | 9.0 | 9.4 | 9.8 | 8.9 | 10.8 | 10.5 | 11.5 | 10.6 |
TaL | 5.8 | 5.8 | 5.3 | 5.4 | 5.3 | 5.6 | 4.7 | 4.5 | 4.7 | 5.0 | 4.9 | 6.4 | 6.2 | 6.1 | 5.6 |
FL | 11.1 | 11.0 | 10.4 | 10.6 | 9.6 | 10.3 | 9.6 | 8.3 | 9.5 | 9.9 | 9.9 | 10.7 | 10.7 | 10.9 | 9.6 |
Toe4L | 6.1 | 5.5 | 5.1 | 5.3 | 4.7 | 5.1 | 4.9 | 4.4 | 4.7 | 5.2 | 4.6 | 5.9 | 5.4 | 4.9 | 4.8 |
IMTL | 1.6 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.7 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.4 | 1.2 |
UAL | 4.7 | 4.6 | 4.9 | 4.5 | 4.4 | 4.9 | 3.5 | 3.4 | 4.2 | 4.6 | 3.8 | 5.0 | 5.6 | 5.9 | 4.8 |
FLL | 6.6 | 6.1 | 6.6 | 6.5 | 5.9 | 6.9 | 5.4 | 5.3 | 5.5 | 5.9 | 5.5 | 6.5 | 6.7 | 7.0 | 6.1 |
HAL | 6.3 | 6.1 | 6.5 | 6.5 | 4.8 | 5.8 | 5.3 | 5.0 | 5.4 | 5.7 | 4.9 | 6.6 | 6.6 | 6.8 | 5.6 |
Fin3L | 3.6 | 3.2 | 3.4 | 3.4 | 2.3 | 2.6 | 2.5 | 2.2 | 2.8 | 3.0 | 2.2 | 2.8 | 3.4 | 3.1 | 2.9 |
Dorsal skin rough, with brown-tipped conical spines on dorsum, arms, legs, dorsal and lateral surface of snout, top of head, and outer ring of tympanum. Ventral, gular skin, and ventral surface of limbs granular with no spines. Dorsum with very prominent rounded glandular warts, located mostly around pale mid-dorsal and sacral blotches, and dorsolaterally towards the flanks (Fig.
Color.
In life, dorsal coloration consists of a set of pale beige blotches distributed along the vertebral region, forming a symmetrical pattern (Fig.
Osteology
(Fig.
CT-scan of Poyntonophrynus nambensis sp. nov. holotype (
Eight distinct, procoelous, non-imbricating, not synostosed presacral vertebrae. Atlas without transverse processes, with widely separated cotyles. Sacrum procoelous with laterally expanded transverse processes, bearing expanded diapophyses. Urostyle long and thin with weakly developed dorsal ridge on proximal half, a small pointy posteriorly directed protrusion on the right side of its right cotyle, and bicondylar articulation with sacrum. Pectoral girdle firmisternal, with widely spaced and slender coracoids. Clavicles slender, nearly reaching one another. Scapulae are stout, directed laterally but strongly curving dorsally at lateral extent. No visible ossified sternum or omosternum. Pelvic girdle comprising ilium, pubis, and ischium. Shaft of ilium long and slender, lacking a dorsal crest. Radioulna shorter than humerus. Humerus bearing a ventral crest on proximal half, and without medial and lateral crest. Phalangeal formula for manus 2–2–3–3. Ossified prepollex formed by two elements, a rounded proximal element, and a thinner, elongated and pointy distal element. Tips of terminal manual phalanges weakly expanded into small knobs. Tibiofibula around same length as femur. Phalangeal formula for pes 2–2–3–4–3. Tips of terminal pedal phalanges weakly expanded as in fingers. A single ossified prehallux.
Males (SVL 24.4–26.4 mm, n = 6) smaller than females (30.7–34.9 mm, n = 8). Males with a dense covering of minute dark asperities on upper and inner surfaces of finger I and to a lesser extent on the upper medial surface of finger II and inner metacarpal tubercle. Males with smoother skin than females, with few spines on snout, different from females, which have a rough dorsal skin. Parotoid glands on males less conspicuous and more flattened than on females.
Measurements of the type series are presented in Table
Coloration varying in shades of grey, beige and brown with some traces of brick orange and dark brown (Fig.
Humeri of male
The type series was collected in the rainy season, during the night, while breeding in small rocky pools on granite boulders, where two pairs were found in axillary amplexus (Fig.
This species is only known from the region of Serra da Namba, 1730–1840 m a.s.l., in the Angolan highlands. It has been recorded in various sites in relatively close proximity along the south and western slopes of the main mountain of Namba. So far, it has not been found in the escarpment zone or in other surveyed mountains in the highlands, suggesting that it may be endemic to Namba. The species appears to be locally common and its rupicolous habitat is probably not threatened, but until more research is conducted, we suggest it to be listed as Data Deficient (DD) as per IUCN Red List categories (IUCN 2022).
The specific epithet nambensis (Pt.) is a reference to the Namba mountains. This is the largest and more preserved relic of Afromontane forest and montane grasslands in Angola. However, it lacks official protection. We suggest “Namba pygmy toad” and “sapo pigmeu da Namba” as English and Portuguese common names respectively.
Amphibians are the least studied tetrapods in Angola (
Both new species showed consistent molecular divergence, with each species represented by distinct lineages, with no detected gene flow between them. Moreover, they are all morphologically distinguishable, which is remarkable in a genus characterized by such a conserved external morphology (e.g.,
Lower pairwise distances (around 3%) for the 16S gene have been reported in several Malagasy (
Poyntonophrynus are known to be generally associated with arid and semi-arid environments (
The complex distributional patterns exhibited in a relatively constricted area found within Angolan Poyntonophrynus, with endemic species in the escarpment (P. fernandae sp. nov.), the central highlands (Namba) (P. nambensis sp. nov.), the inselberg of Serra da Neve (P. pachnodes), and the arid coastal plains of the Namib Desert (P. dombensis and P. grandisonae), is strikingly similar to that of other rupicolous vertebrates. Two non-related lizard genera i.e., the Cordylus girdled lizards and Afroedura geckos, comprise endemic species in these same regions (
Poyntonophrynus fernandae sp. nov. sensu stricto and P. cf. fernandae, showed low pairwise distances in the mitochondrial marker 16S (2 %), but no haplotypes were shared for the RAG1 nuclear marker. Both lineages were found in association with rock boulders. Poyntonophrynus fernandae sp. nov. sensu stricto was found at lower elevation (520–1303 m a.s.l.), and mostly near moister forests in or near the escarpment, while P. cf. fernandae was found in montane grassland at higher elevations (1730 m a.s.l.). The syntopic toads from the central highlands, P. cf. fernandae and P. nambensis sp. nov., were both collected at relatively high altitude i.e., above 1,600 m a.s.l., exclusively in the ancient mountain chain of Namba, in what is generally called the Angolan ancient massif or ancient plateau (
Poyntonophrynus are often sympatric with congeners (
Several taxonomic questions are associated with Poyntonophrynus. At the species level, species distinction is problematic, and the validity of some species has been questioned e.g., P. dombensis vs. P. damaranus (see
The two newly described species and P. cf. fernandae fit the general Poyntonophrynus osteology i.e., in having the shaft of the squamosal reduced or lost, and an elongate quadratojugal that attains the articulation between the maxilla and the pterygoid at its anterior extent. They also lack reduced presacral vertebrae (
External morphological synapomorphies of Poyntonophrynus might be the lack of a tarsal fold, usually double subarticular tubercles, a distinct tympanum, and mostly indistinct parotoid glands (
The description of two new species endemic from the western escarpment and the central highlands provides further support to recognize these regions as centers of endemism, as predicted by
The uniqueness and importance of this region is even more evident when Angolan highlands are put in an African context (
We dedicate this work to the late William R. Branch, who was part of this project since the very first odd-looking toad collected in Congulo forest, and immediately suspected that we were dealing with undescribed diversity. We thank the Angolan Ministry of Environment Institute of Biodiversity (MINAMB) issuing export permits (002/INBC.MCTA/2021) for biodiversity surveys that resulted in the discovery of the new species, and in particular the Director of Instituto Nacional da Biodiversidade e Conservação (INBC), Dr. Albertina Nzuzi. Specimens were collected under permits no. 002/2015 issued by Instituto Superior de Ciências de Educação da Huíla (ISCED-Huíla). We thank Fernanda Lages from ISCED-Huíla, and Edna Azevedo and Vladimir Russo from Fundação Kissama for logistical and administrative support. We thank Luke Verburgt for having kindly contributed with critical specimens, samples, and photographs used in this study. We thank Werner Conradie for revising a preliminary version of the manuscript, and for providing sequences of P. vertebralis (WC-3458, WC-3460, WC-3459, WC-DNA-181). We thank Alan Channing for providing measurements and photographs of specimens of P. jordani, including of the holotype. We are indebted to Mr. Chiquinho and Mr. Albino, owners of two farms at Namba and to the religious mission of Namba, for having hosted the members of the research team during various survey efforts at Namba. Funding for fieldwork in Angola and genetic analysis was provided by the National Research Foundation of South Africa (to William R. Branch). We thank NRF-SAIAB Aquatic Genomics Research Platform for the use of infrastructure and equipment, and the funding channeled through the NRF-SAIAB Institutional Support System. From
Figure S1
Data type: .jpg
Explanation note: Principal component analysis of size-corrected morphometric features of the three new Poyntonophrynus lineages recorded in this study, and of the other species occurring in Angola (P. pachnodes, P. dombensis, P. grandisonae, and P. kavangensis).
Figure S2
Data type: .jpg
Explanation note: CT-scan of Poyntonophrynus dombensis (FKH-406, male). A Skeleton in dorsal view. B Lateral, dorsal and ventral views of skull (left to right). C Pectoral girdle in ventral view. D Ventral views of right hand and right foot (left to right).
Figure S3
Data type: .jpg
Explanation note: CT-scan of Poyntonophrynus dombensis (
Tables S1–S4
Data type: .docx
Explanation note: Table S1. Vouchers of Poyntonophrynus spp. examined for analysis of qualitative features, comparison with literature, definition of categories, and creation of comparative table. — Table S2. High Resolution X-ray Computed Tomography (HRCT) parameters used to scan Poyntonophrynus full body scans and skulls. — Table S3. Measurements (in mm) of specimens of Poyntonophrynus dombensis, P. kavangensis, and P. pachnodes taken for this study. For abbreviations see Methods section. M—male, F—female. — Table S4. PCA loadings of the first three principal components, based on 11 size-corrected measurements of adult Poyntonophrynus. For abbreviations of measurements see Methods section. Bold highlighted loadings show the measurements that loaded most highly for each principal component.
File S1
Data type: .docx
Explanation note: Osteological description of Poyntonophrynus dombensis (Bocage, 1895).