Research Article
Print
Research Article
Integrative analysis of geographic variation and species boundaries in the white-lipped pitviper complex (Squamata: Viperidae: Crotalinae: Trimeresurus albolabris)
expand article infoAnita Malhotra, Mrinalini Walter§, Guillem Limia Russel, Roger S. Thorpe
‡ Bangor University, Bangor, United Kingdom
§ National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
Open Access

Abstract

In this study, we present a comprehensive analysis of species in the Trimeresurus albolabris complex (comprising the white-lipped pitviper, its former subspecies, and closely related species) to identify genetic and phenotypic lines of evidence to assess whether these taxa represent independently evolving lineages or populations with wide-ranging variants. Our morphometric data set includes over 400 live and preserved specimens spanning almost the entire range of T. albolabris sensu stricto and its relatives. We compare patterns of differentiation in three mitochondrial gene fragments for over 300 specimens and conduct a population genetic analysis of nuclear NT3 sequences from over 200 specimens. This level of detail allowed us to identify instances of incongruence between morphological affinities, mitochondrial clades, and nuclear haplotype distribution in putative taxa throughout Indochina. Although recently described species from this region, including T. salazar, T. caudornatus, and T. uetzi, are related to T. septentrionalis in the mitochondrial phylogeny, they extensively share nuclear haplotypes with the purpureomaculatus group, particularly with T. erythrurus. The most common haplotype of T. albolabris sensu stricto is also present throughout Indochina. However, populations in southern Indochina and western Java are morphologically differentiated, belong to distinct mitochondrial clades, and have a high proportion of private NT3 alleles. As they appear to intergrade extensively with populations further north, we herein resurrect the Javan taxon Bothrops viridis var. fario Jan, 1859 as a nomen for this population at the subspecies level, as Trimeresurus albolabris fario comb. nov. Furthermore, we lower the rank of taxa from the extensive zone of intergradation that stretches from Myanmar to central Vietnam to that of subspecies under T. albolabris (T. a. guoi) or T. septentrionalis (T. s. salazar, T. s. caudornatus, and T. s. uetzi), pending detailed further investigations of the extent of gene flow between them and other recognised species in the complex.

Keywords

Asian pitvipers, cytonuclear discordance, gene flow, multivariate morphology, species delimitation, subspecies

Introduction

The number of new species descriptions is accelerating every year, but it is hardly making an impact on the number of species still awaiting description (Bouchet et al. 2023). Meanwhile, end users of taxonomy are increasingly calling for nomenclatural stability because they see the costs of change outweigh the benefits (Thiele et al. 2021). These costs differ among taxa and regions: where taxonomic effort has been protracted and considerable, taxonomic changes might be attributed to “taxonomic tinkering” (e.g., in well-studied Holarctic bird species; Funk et al. 2021), and largely amount to splitting, lumping, or allocation of species to higher-level taxa. However, in regions that have not been well studied, especially among lesser studied taxa, totally novel taxa are being described as a result of true species discovery rather than an application of new approaches to species delimitation (e.g., tropical or deep-sea invertebrates; Salinas-de-León et al. 2020). There is inevitably a grey area between these two extremes, resulting both from better sampling (allowing the detection of multiple cryptic species in a taxon formerly considered to be a single widespread species) and inherent in the speciation process itself (Burbrink et al. 2021; Sánchez et al. 2023).

The ability to uncover cryptic taxa, although partly due to better sampling, is also a consequence of better and increasingly accessible analytical techniques, such as mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) analysis. However, these techniques can introduce the potential pitfall of arbitrarily partitioning continuous variation in biologically relevant features (Leaché et al. 2019; Padial and De la Riva 2020; Hillis et al. 2021). Non-recombining matrilineally inherited mitochondrial markers give the impression of distinct categories where, in fact, there could be substantial gene flow at the nuclear level (Toews and Brelsford 2012). Even when distinct mtDNA lineages do underly distinct species, past mitochondrial introgression may result in erroneous inference of their distribution (Seixas et al. 2018). Avoiding this pitfall therefore requires extensive sampling of the species in question throughout their ranges (Nabhan and Sarkar 2012), particularly in putative contact zones (Chambers et al. 2023; Wüster et al. 2024). Where morphologically distinct forms occur in sympatry, there is a clear case for distinguishing species (Coyne and Orr 2004; Vences et al. 2024); however, the case for distinct species is less easily made for geographically non-overlapping entities, since considerable morphological variation may exist at the intraspecific level (Hillis et al. 2021; Hillis 2022).

As a consequence, integrative analysis has become an increasingly utilised approach, where support from two or more independent lines of evidence (e.g., molecular, morphological, environmental) is required to propose new species, in addition to formal descriptions (Padial et al. 2010; McGuire et al. 2023). Even so, the success of species delimitation efforts varies widely, as exemplified by the reanalysis of data presented by Arteaga et al. (2024) to justify splitting Bothriechis schlegelii into nine species, which concluded that only two species-level lineages were actually supported (Reyes-Velasco 2024). Regardless of the move to integrative taxonomy, or an even more recent trend to directly evaluate the extent of reproductive isolation using data from the whole genome (Dufresnes et al. 2019, 2020; Ferrer Obiol et al. 2023), the minimum requirement stipulated by the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN 1999) and other codes of bio-nomenclature is a diagnosis statement listing how the proposed new taxon is purported to be distinguished from other similar species. While these codes exist as accounting systems and do not aim to dictate taxonomic approaches, the accuracy of a diagnosis is a serious responsibility for authors and any insufficiencies in the evidence presented would ideally be flagged up during peer review. However, it can be difficult for reviewers to verify the proposed diagnostic characters, especially when these are not substantiated by statistical analysis. Diagnosability, while an essential part of species description, is not sufficient in itself to determine the species status of a taxon (Dufresnes et al. 2023), and failure to clearly align the evidence with an underlying species concept can lead to over-splitting and taxonomic inflation. Meanwhile, proponents of DNA barcoding sometimes dispense with traditional diagnoses altogether in the interests of facilitating description of hyperdiverse understudied taxa (Meierotto et al. 2019; Sharkey et al. 2021). Hence, there seems to be a widening gap between the minimum requirements to validly describe a new taxon and what would be considered “best practice” by most taxonomists (Kaiser et al. 2013; Ahrens et al. 2021; Chan and Grismer 2021a; Meier et al. 2022).

The importance of accuracy in species delimitation is underlined by the knock-on effects on inferences where species definitions play a key role, such as understanding the speciation process, assessing biodiversity, drafting protection legislation, determining conservation priorities (Maritz et al. 2016; Simkins et al. 2020; Flanagan et al. 2024) and controlling invasive species (Douglas et al. 2009; Pyšek et al. 2013). For some taxa, such as venomous animals, getting the taxonomy correct could literally be lifesaving (Warrell 2008). In this paper, we deal with one such group, specifically the diverse venomous Trimeresurus pitvipers (Serpentes: Viperidae: Crotalinae) that are widespread across southern Asia (Fig. 1).

Figure 1. 

Representatives of genera formerly considered Trimeresurus as proposed by Malhotra and Thorpe (2004) based on morphologically diagnosable mitochondrial clades. A Trimeresurus insularis (listed as Cryptelytrops by Malhotra and Thorpe 2004, see text for further explanation) B Craspedocephalus macrolepis (listed as Peltopelor by Malhotra and Thorpe 2004, see text for further explanation) C Popeia popeiorum. D Parias sumatranus E Himalayophis tibetanus F Viridovipera gumprechti. Photos: Guillem Limia Russel (A–D), Frank Tillack (E), and Anita Malhotra (F).

A brief taxonomic history of Trimeresurus

The taxonomic history of Trimeresurus has largely been one of splitting, a process that began almost a century ago. Their morphological conservativism and wide distribution across Asia had initially led these mostly green pitvipers (also called bamboo pitvipers) to be referred to a single species, Trimeresurus gramineus (Shaw, 1802). Various attempts were made to distinguish different forms within T. gramineus, as documented by Stejneger (1927), who summarised the main distinguishing characters as the size of the internasal scales and their contact or separation; fusion of the nasal shield with the first supralabial or their separation by a suture; presence or absence of one or more scales between the nasal and the shield bordering it anteriorly; and the size and arrangement of gular scales. He used these characters to separate a “northern form” as T. gramineus stejnegeri and a further form, T. gramineus yunnanensis, on the basis of a lower number of scale rows at midbody (Stejneger 1927). Pope and Pope (1933) went further by distinguishing six species, based on three different hemipenis structures and similar differences in scalation. They were the first to separate members of the white-lipped pitviper complex (T. albolabris and its relatives) using a combination of hemipenis type (“long and slender, entirely devoid of spines”) and fusion of first upper labial and nasal scale, which are still the recognised diagnostic characters unifying this complex. They also distinguished three species within this group based on the keeling and form of head scales. Over the last 50 years, changes to the taxonomy of Trimeresurus have taken place at both the genus and species levels (summarised in File S1).

Several species were moved to newly defined genera, such as Protobothrops Hoge & Romano-Hoge, 1983 and Ovophis Burger in Hoge & Romano-Hoge, 1981. The application of mitochondrial phylogenies led to further clarification of relationships within Trimeresurus sensu lato and, based on the concordance of key morphological features and mitochondrial clades, led to further splitting into six genera by Malhotra and Thorpe (2004). These genera were further verified by additional sampling and inclusion of nuclear intron sequences (Malhotra et al. 2010). Trimeresurus sensu stricto (Fig. 1A; listed as Cryptelytrops by Malhotra and Thorpe 2004 but later corrected by David et al. 2011) is diagnosed by the combination of a partially or fully fused first supralabial and nasal and an elongate hemipenis lacking spines, calyculate distally and with or without soft papillate processes in the region of the fork; Craspedocephalus (Fig. 1B; listed as Trimeresurus by Malhotra and Thorpe 2004, later corrected by David et al. 2011) by a synapomorphic hemipenis type with many thin spines distributed over the forked region to its tip; Popeia (Fig. 1C) by the combination of a separated first supralabial and nasal and an elongate hemipenis, calyculate distally and lacking both spines and soft papillate processes in the region of the fork; Parias (Fig. 1D) by the combination of a separated first supralabial and nasal and an elongate hemipenis, calyculate distally and lacking spines, with soft papillate processes in the region of the fork; Himalayophis (Fig. 1E) by the presence of a unique hemipenis type (in H. tibetanus; see discussion regarding the apparently unique hemipenis of H. arunachalensis described since); Viridovipera (Fig. 1F) by the combination of a separated first supralabial and nasal and a short hemipenis with a small number of stout spines in the region of the fork, the forked region being very short to moderately long and calyculate distally. Malhotra and Thorpe (2004) originally placed the large-scaled pitviper, C. macrolepis, which was not included in their phylogenetic analysis, in Peltopelor on the basis of its unique hemipenis type, but on the basis of subsequent molecular phylogenetic analysis by Mallik et al. (2021), this taxon was synonymised with Craspedocephalus. Guo and Wang (2011) subsequently described the monotypic genus Sinovipera based on only a very distinct mitochondrial haplotype, but the subsequently described hemipenis (Liu et al. 2014) suggested that this taxon was indistinguishable from Viridovipera. Readers should note that some authorities have preferred to treat these as subgenera following David et al. (2011).

As currently understood, Trimeresurus sensu stricto includes the following 24 species: T. albolabris, T. andersoni, T. ayeyarwadyensis, T. cantori, T. cardamomensis, T. caudornatus, T. (ciliaris, T. cyanolabris, T. davidi, T. erythrurus, T. fasciatus, T. guoi, T. honsonensis, T. insularis, T. kanburiensis, T. kuiburi, T. labialis, T. mutabilis, T. purpureomaculatus, T. rubeus, T. salazar, T. septentrionalis, T. venustus, and T. uetzi. Many of the descriptions of these species were based on traditional morphological examination of a few specimens from a single locality, and some included additional range inferences based on mtDNA analysis alone. The lack of data on the range of these new species leaves users of taxonomy (including the World Health Organisation, since these species are medically significant in most of their range) in a state of uncertainty and confusion.

Trimeresurus sensu stricto can be divided into two distinct groups. The first includes species more closely related to T. macrops (including T. cardamomensis, T. ciliaris, T. cyanolabris, T. honsonensis, T. kanburiensis, T. kuiburi, T. rubeus, and T. venustus), which are not included in the analysis we present here as they are quite distinct morphologically and genetically. The second, and the focus of this study, is the T. albolabris complex, which includes all species formerly included in T. albolabris and their close relatives. Vogel et al. (2023) recently reviewed the mainland populations of the T. albolabris complex using a traditional taxonomic approach, but sampling gaps have left the geographic boundaries between some proposed species unclear and potential gene flow between parapatric putative species has not yet been considered. In this paper, we comprehensively analyse the majority of putative species in the Trimeresurus albolabris complex (as established by Vogel et al. 2023 and Nguyen et al. 2024), spanning most of their ranges, and investigate the current model of species limits by examining genetic and phenotypic gaps that could indicate the presence of independently evolving lineages (Hillis et al. 2021). We use a multivariate representation of morphological variation based on over 400 live and preserved specimens, compare patterns of differentiation in mitochondrial gene fragments in over 300 specimens, and conduct a population genetic analysis of nuclear sequences from over 200 specimens.

Methods

Sampling

Fieldwork was conducted, in Indonesia, Thailand, Vietnam, China, and India to collect live and roadkilled specimens, starting in 1993. Measurements and macrophotographs were taken from live animals obtained in the field while under anaesthesia, and they were later released (as per permit conditions). Tissue samples were collected from live specimens in the form of blood from the caudal vein (maximum of 0.02 ml) and 3–5 clippings of ventral scales in some cases. Blood samples were added to 1 ml 0.5 M EDTA and preserved in 1–5 ml SDS-Tris buffer (100 mM Tris, 3% SDS), while scale clippings were preserved in 95% ethanol. In the case of fresh roadkilled specimens, liver tissue was collected and stored in 95% ethanol. For less fresh roadkills, a piece of muscle tissue was excised and stored in 95% ethanol. In addition, a few freshly shed and dried skins were obtained from private collections and additional tissue samples were obtained from the collections of the CAS (California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, USA), NUOL (National University of Laos, Vientiane, Laos), FMNH (Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, USA), ROM (Royal Ontario Museum, Toronto, Canada), ZMB (Museum für Naturkunde Berlin, Germany), WAM (Western Australian Museum, Welshpool, Australia), JSC (Japan Snake Centre, Gunma, Japan) from collections made in Myanmar, Laos, Cambodia, Vietnam, Indonesia (Java) and Indonesia (Lesser Sunda Islands), and Myanmar, respectively. Institutional codes follow Sabaj (2020, 2023).

DNA extraction, PCR, and sequencing

A variety of DNA extraction methods were used depending on the type and quantity of sample available. The Qiagen DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit was used following the manufacturer’s protocol (www.qiagen.com/HB-2061), with elution volumes reduced to 100 µl and 50 µl for the first and second elutions, respectively. Gel electrophoresis and an ND1000 Nanodrop Spectrophotometer were used for concentration and purity checks of Qiagen extracts, and amplification was performed using Thermofisher Dreamtaq Green PCR Mastermix. For samples with smaller amounts of tissue, the PCRBio Rapid Lysis Extraction Kit was used in combination with PCRBio PCR Mastermix or Thermofisher Dreamtaq Green PCR Mastermix, and no purification step was performed as contaminants are highly diluted and do not inhibit PCR reactions. Four mitochondrial genes, cytochrome b (cyt b), NADH dehydrogenase subunit four (ND4), 12S small subunit ribosomal RNA (12S), and 16S large subunit ribosomal RNA (16S), and one nuclear gene, neurotrophin 3 (NT3), were amplified using primers and conditions listed in File S2. The nuclear gene NT3 was chosen as it has previously shown considerable levels of within-group sequence variation (Zhu et al. 2016), and a significant amount of data was already available for species of the T. albolabris complex on GenBank. We also tested Rag1, UBN1, PRLR, and cmos but our preliminary analysis on a panel of specimens representing the diversity of the ingroup showed little variation and these were not pursued further. After confirming amplification with gel electrophoresis, PCR products were cleaned using the Thermofisher ExoSAP-IT Express reagent and Sanger-sequenced at Macrogen Europe (www.macrogen-europe.com), with templates sequenced in both directions where heterozygotes were present.

Sequence curation

Sequence chromatograms were manually inspected and edited in MEGA7 (Kumar et al. 2016) to correct errors, trim ends, and to detect heterozygous positions in the case of the nuclear gene. Sites were assessed as heterozygotes only if they were unambiguous and present in both forward and reverse sequences and were assigned the appropriate IUPAC ambiguity code. Each gene alignment was initially produced using MUSCLE (Edgar 2004), with further manual curation to ensure that sequences had been aligned identically. Protein-coding genes were checked for unexpected stop codons, in which case chromatograms were reviewed. As the reverse primer for ND4 is located in the neighbouring tRNA, the 3’ region was deleted after the stop codon. All novel gene sequences produced in this study have been deposited in GenBank (for accession numbers see File S3) and the alignments are available at http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14852209. Additional sequences of the Trimeresurus complex were downloaded from GenBank. The 12S gene was eliminated from further analysis because sequences were largely missing and we determined that it did not affect the overall result. Due to many recent taxonomic changes in this group, the species names applied to sequences on GenBank are highly variable and likely erroneous. In order to avoid errors in phylogenetic resolution arising from sequences assigned to incorrect species, we renamed these sequences according to their locations based on range descriptions in Vogel et al. (2023) and geographic locations shown in their fig. 5 for the albolabris and septentrionalis group and Chan et al. (2023a) for the purpureomaculatus group.

Phylogenetic analysis

Bayesian Inference (BI) analysis was conducted on the mitochondrial dataset using MrBayes v3.2.7 (Ronquist et al. 2012) on the CIPRES web portal (Miller et al. 2010). Sixteen sequences from species closely related to T. macrops and other species in the related genera Popeia, Viridovipera, and Parias were included, and Parias hageni, as the most basal taxon among these genera, was set as the outgroup. Data were partitioned into seven partitions: 16S, cyt b position 1, 2 and 3, and ND4 position 1, 2, and 3. We implemented a mixed model approach, allowing different data partitions to evolve under different stochastic evolutionary models (Ronquist and Huelsenbeck 2003). Four independent runs with four chains (including one cold chain) were run for 10 M generations, with a sampling frequency of 5000. Convergence of likelihood were ascertained using Tracer v1.7.1 (Rambaut et al. 2018). Converged runs were trimmed using the appropriate burn-in cut-off determined for each run individually and combined, and a maximum clade credibility tree was calculated using TreeAnnotator v2.6.7 (Bouckaert et al. 2019) to calculate the maximum clade credibility tree using common ancestor heights. Resulting trees were visualised in FigTree v1.4.4 (Rambaut 2010). A posterior probability (PP) > 80% was considered to infer strong support and < 50% to infer no support.

A Maximum Likelihood tree was constructed using IQ-TREE (Nguyen et al. 2015) on the IQ-TREE webserver (Trifinopoulos et al. 2016) using the same partitions as above. Models were selected using the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) by ModelFinder (Kalyaanamoorthy et al. 2017), with confidence assessed by 10,000 UltraFast Bootstraps (UFB) (Minh et al. 2013) as well as by approximate Shimodira-Hasegawa likelihood ratio branch tests (aSH-LRT). A minimum of 95% UFB and 80% aSH-LRT was required to infer strong support as recommended by Minh et al. (2013).

Network analysis

A haplotype network was created for the NT3 nuclear gene, since lower levels of sequence variation in this gene suggested that ancestral haplotypes would still be present at the population level, thus violating some of the assumptions of a phylogenetic approach (Bandelt et al. 1999) and allowing mutational steps between haplotypes to be reconstructed. NT3 haplotypes were reconstructed using PHASE, implemented in DnaSP v6 (Rozas et al. 2017). Since the gene alignment used is relatively short (489 bp), PHASE was set to assume no recombination. Five replicates using different random seeds were run and results from each were compared. Since the method has proved to be robust to deviations from Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium (HWE), all Trimeresurus sequences were included. However, to verify that this did not bias the results, we also ran PHASE separately on the purpureomaculatus group, insularis, albolabris, septentrionalis, and the macrops group (as defined by our mitochondrial phylogeny) and reassembled the haplotype sequences for subsequent analysis. For direct comparison, we also constructed a haplotype network for the slowest-evolving fragment in the mitochondrial dataset, 16S.

Median-joining networks (Bandelt et al. 1999) were created and haplotype distribution plotted on a map using PopART v1.7 (https://popart.maths.otago.ac.nz). Haplowebs, which add information about co-occurring haplotypes in heterozygous individuals and enable species to be depicted as interconnected groups of haplotypes (Flot et al. 2010; Dellicour and Flot 2015; Martinsson et al. 2020), were created using Haplowebmaker (https://eeg-ebe.github.io/HaplowebMaker; Spöri and Flot 2020).

Morphological analysis

Museum specimens were examined from the following collections (in alphabetical order of acronym, for acronyms not in bold, see above under ‘Sampling’): AMNH (American Museum of Natural History, New York, USA), CAS, CIB (Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu, China), CUMZ (Chulalongkorn University Museum of Natural History, Bangkok, Thailand), FMNH, NUOL, ZRC (Lee Kong Chian Natural History Museum, Faculty of Science, National University of Singapore, Singapore), MCZ (Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, USA), MHNG (Muséum d’Histoire Naturelle de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland), NCSM (North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences, Raleigh, USA), NHMUK (Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom), NMBA (Naturhistorisches Museum Basel, Basel, Switzerland), NMBE (Naturhistorisches Museum der Bürgergemeinde Bern, Bern, Switzerland), NMW (Naturhistorisches Museum Wien, Vienna, Austria), NMP (National Museum, Prague, Czech Republic), QSMI (Queen Savoabha Memorial Institute, Bangkok, Thailand), ROM (Royal Ontario Museum, Toronto, Canada), SMF (Forschungsinstitut und Naturmuseum Senckenberg, Frankfurt am Main, Germany), UF (Florida Museum of Natural History, Gainesville, USA), USNM (National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C., USA), WAM, YBU (Yibin University, Yibin, China), ZMB, ZSI-K (Zoological Society of India, Kolkata, India), and the private collections of Jack Cox, Andreas Gumprecht, and Nam Nao National Park, Thailand.

In order to ensure the comparability of measurements made on live animals vs. preserved animals, in a few cases where permissions allowed, specimens were euthanised and preserved (first fixed in 10% formalin for 24 h, then transferred to and stored in 70% ethanol) and re-measured > 12 months after preservation. All data were recorded by AM, and in order to control for recording drift, specimens from the AMNH examined in 1993 were re-measured in 2009. Sex was confirmed by presence/absence of hemipenes, by observation if everted, or by dissection if in situ, in the case of preserved specimens. In live animals, this was done by observation of the shape of the tail immediately post-vent: in females, the difference in width between the body pre-vent and the tail post-vent is very obvious, while in males, due to the presence of the elongated hemipenes, the width of the tail post-vent is similar to the width of the body before the vent, and tapers gradually towards the tip. Over 420 specimens were examined in total, and 181 male and 221 female specimens were included in the analysis. Characters measured are listed in Table 1 and further described and illustrated in in File S4.

Table 1.

Morphological characters and their abbreviations. (A) Scale counts were obtained by counting on both sides for bilateral characters, and average values were used in the analysis. (B) Scale reduction characters, from 29–15 scales on the body and from 14–4 scales in males/12–4 scales in females on the tail. The suffix _PC indicates conversion of the raw count to a percentage of total VSC/SCS. (C) Morphometric measurements (mensural characters): All measurements were made to the nearest 0.5 mm using digital callipers on the right side of the head only (unless damaged, where the left side was used instead), except for SVL and TAIL, which were measured to the nearest mm. For preserved specimens which could not be straightened, this was measured along the vertebral column with a non-elastic string, then this was measured against a ruler or measuring tape. (D) Ordinal characters (colouration and keeling): All keeling characters were measured on a scale of 0 (no keeling) to 1.5 (sharp keel present) in 0.5 increments.

Abbreviation Character description
A — SCALE COUNTS
VSC Number of ventral scales, not including the scale covering the cloacal opening. The first ventral scale is defined as the first complete ventral scale after the paired chin shields (see Discussion for why Dowling’s method was not used).
SCS Number of paired subcaudal scales. Fused scales were treated as a pair. A single scale on one side only was counted as 0.5.
VENTEDGE Number of gular scales between the edge of the mouth and the ventral scales/genial shields, starting at and including last infralabial.
GENIAL Number of paired chin shields between first infralabial scales and first ventral scale
POSTOC Number of postocular scales, not counting supra- or subocular scales
SOCBORD Number of scales contacting subocular, not counting those immediately before and after.
SUPLAB Number of supralabials
INFLAB Number of infralabials (also known as lateral gulars)
BORSUPOC Number of scales bordering supraocular scales, not counting pre- or postoculars
BTWSUPOC1 Minimum number of scales between supraoculars
BTWSUPOC2 Minimum number of scales between posterior edges of supraoculars
NASPIT Number of scales between the nasal scale and the shield bordering the pit anteriorly
INTNAS Number of scales separating the internasal scales
LABNAS Degree of fusion between scale surrounding nostril and first supralabial scale, ranging from no fusion (0) to complete fusion (1) in increments of 0.25
LAB3 Minimum number of scales separating 3rd supralabial and subocular
LAB4 Minimum number of scales separating 4th supralabial and subocular
LAB5 Minimum number of scales separating 5th supralabial and subocular
ROST Shape of rostral scale measured as ratio of dorsal margin to ventral margin
B — SCALE REDUCTION CHARACTERS: two characters recorded for each scale reduction
VSxtoy/SCxtoy VSC or SC position, the ventral or subcaudal scale at which the scale reductions occur (averaged if different on either side)
DVxtoy DV, the average dorsoventral position of lowest of the two scale rows involved in the scale reduction
C — MEASUREMENTS
WSUPOC Width of supraocular, at its widest point
LSUPOC Length of supraocular
WINTNAS Width of internasal, measured horizontally with respect to the head
EYE2NOS Distance between eye and nostril, measured from the suture between second and third preoculars and inner edge of nostril
NOS2PIT Distance between pit and nostril, measured between their outer edges
PIT2EYE Distance between eye and pit, measured between their inner edges along the suture between first second preoculars
DEYE Horizontal diameter of eye (not measured in live animals to avoid damaging eye)
WHEAD1 Width of head measured between outer rear edges of supraoculars
WHEAD2 Width of head measured at its widest point
LHEAD Length of the head measured between tip of snout to posterior edge of lower jawbone
SVL Distance between the tip of the snout and the cloaca (in cm, to nearest mm).
TAIL Distance between the anterior edge of the first subcaudal scale and the tip of the tail (in cm, to nearest mm)
D — COLOUR and KEELING
STRIPE Presence of stripe covering dorsal scale row one (0, absent; 1, indistinct; 2, distinct)
SCRSTR Number of scale rows involved in stripe
SCR1 The proportion of the first scale row covered by the light area
OCSTRIPE Postocular stripe (0, absent; 1, indistinct; 2, distinct)
SCROC Number of scale rows involved in postocular stripe
LIPCOL Number of scales above lip covered by ventral colour
BSCK Keeling of body scales measured at mid-body
KTEMP Keeling of temporal scales
KHEADSC Keeling of head scales
KBTWSUPOC Keeling of scales between supraoculars.

Scale reductions, which depend on ventral or subcaudal scale counts, were first converted to a percentage to account for variation in ventral or subcaudal scale counts. There was a substantial amount of missing data, with very few specimens having the full set of characters recorded. This was due to a combination of factors, including the difficulties of measuring some characters in live animals, time constraints during fieldwork, damage to roadkilled specimens, and poor state of preservation and/or small size of museum specimens.

Because some grouping of specimens is necessary for preliminary processing (e.g., imputation of missing values, elimination of uninformative characters), initial grouping was done conservatively, using biogeographical features such as elevational differences and major rivers as a guide whenever possible to keep groups as geographically focussed as possible. In order to verify assigned groups and prevent that they contain a mixture of species, Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was performed on each putative group with sexes combined in order to maximise sample size, using different subsets of meristic characters. As these pitvipers are known to be sexually dimorphic in many characters, PC1 would be expected to separate sexes, while PC2 should be relatively homogenous if all specimens belong to the same population and/or species. Specimens that appeared divergent were checked for data errors and if no errors were found, they were included in geographically adjacent groups and the procedure repeated. If affinities continued to be unclear, specimens were not a priori assigned to a group. Once groups were verified (Fig. 2; Table 2), missing meristic data were estimated by inserting group means when < 30% of the data for that character were missing in that group. This allowed more specimens to be included in subsequent analyses without overly biasing the distribution of data in each group.

Figure 2. 

Location of samples used for morphometric analyses showing final groups used in the canonical variate analysis. For details of numbers of males and females see Table 2. The oval map in the centre shows the approximate distribution of the Trimeresurus albolabris complex in green. A albolabris group (circles) B septentrionalis group (triangles) C purpureomaculatus group (diamonds, except for T. mutabilis, which is indicated by a star to distinguish it from T. cantori from the same location) D insularis group (squares). Localities are numbered as follows: 1. Hong Kong, 2. Komodo Island, Indonesia, 3. central Thailand, 4. northeastern China, 5. southern Thailand, 6. Flores Island, Indonesia, 7. eastern Java, Indonesia, 8. southeastern Thailand, 9. Ayeyarwady Delta, Myanmar, 10. northern Thailand, 11. central Laos, 12. Dooars, northeastern India, 13. northern Vietnam, 14. southern China, 15. Krong Pa, Vietnam, 16. West Malaysia, 17. Shan State, Myanmar, 18. western Java, 19. northern Laos, 20. Timor Island, Indonesia, 21. Sumba Island, Indonesia, 24. southern Vietnam, 25. Mekong Delta, 26. southern Sumatra, Indonesia, 27. central Vietnam ,28. Hainan Island, China, 29. northern peninsular Thailand, 31. central Nicobar Islands, India (T. cantori), 32. Car Nicobar Island, India, 33. Andaman Islands, India, 35. Wetar Island, Indonesia, 36. Lang Biang plateau, Vietnam, 38. Northern Myanmar, 39. Sankamphaeng mountain range, Thailand, 40. Bolaven plateau, Laos, 43. central Myanmar, 44. Arakan Yoma mountain range, Myanmar, 46. Bali Island, Indonesia, 47. northeastern India and Bangladesh, 48. western Myanmar, 49. southern Myanmar, 52. Himachal Pradesh, India, 53. Western Nepal, 55. Chaing Mai, Thailand, 59. northeastern Thailand, 60. central Nicobar Islands (T. mutabilis). Symbols and colours are as used in subsequent figures. Note that location numbers are not consecutive as the full list includes locations at which Trimeresurus species are not present.

Table 2.

List of final groups and sample sizes of male (M) and female (F) specimens for the morphological analysis. Locality numbers are as listed in Figure 2.

Number Locality Putative Species M F
1 Hong Kong albolabris 10 12
2 Komodo Island insularis 9 9
3 Central Thailand albolabris 5 8
4 Northeastern China albolabris 3 8
5 Southern Thailand albolabris 0 10
6 Flores Island insularis 8 5
7 Eastern Java insularis 2 9
8 Southeastern Thailand albolabris 1 4
9 Ayeyarwady Delta, Myanmar ayeyarwadyensis 8 13
10 Northern Thailand guoi 5 3
11 Central Laos albolabris 2 2
12 Dooars, northeastern India salazar 6 3
13 Northern Vietnam albolabris 7 5
14 Southern China albolabris 4 6
15 Krông Pa District, Vietnam albolabris 6 2
16 West Malaysia purpureomaculatus 4 0
17 Shan State, Myanmar guoi 1 3
18 Western Java albolabris 3 7
19 Northern Laos guoi 1 1
20 Timor Island insularis 3 2
21 Sumba Island insularis 4 7
24 Southern Vietnam albolabris 6 9
25 Mekong Delta albolabris 1 3
26 Southern Sumatra albolabris 3 0
27 Central Vietnam albolabris 1 3
28 Hainan Island albolabris 9 10
29 Northern Peninsular Thailand albolabris 8 0
31 Central Nicobars – cantori cantori 3 3
32 Car Nicobar Island davidi 3 3
33 Andaman Islands andersoni 0 2
35 Wetar Island insularis 3 3
36 Lang Biang Plateau, Vietnam albolabris 3 3
38 Northern Myanmar caudornatus 7 7
39 Sankamphaeng Mts, Thailand albolabris 7 8
40 Bolaven Plateau, Laos albolabris 0 3
43 Central Myanmar uetzi 7 1
44 Arakan Yoma Mountains erythrurus 6 5
46 Bali Island insularis 0 3
47 Northeastern India and Bangladesh erythrurus 10 7
48 Western Myanmar uetzi 4 6
49 Southern Myanmar guoi 3 3
52 Himachal Pradesh, India septentrionalis 5 1
53 Western Nepal septentrionalis 6 11
55 Chiang Mai, Thailand guoi 7 3
59 Northeastern Thailand albolabris 7 2
60 Central Nicobars – mutabilis mutabilis 1 3
TOTAL 181 221

A two-way ANOVA using sex and locality as factors revealed that many characters were sexually dimorphic, and hence further analysis was performed on each sex separately. ANOVA was conducted on all meristic data using groups with a sample size of = 5, along with a Levene’s Test (Levene 1960) to test the assumption of homoscedasticity. If the latter was found to be violated, an alternative test that relaxes this assumption was used instead (Brown and Forsythe 1974). Location was used as the factor in these tests to determine whether characters showed geographic variation. Only characters showing significant among-location variation were used in further analysis. Ordinal characters, which are unlikely to meet the assumptions of parametric statistical tests, were first combined using PCA into two sets of characters (Thorpe et al. 2008). The first, on four keeling characters (BSCK, KTEMP, KHEADSC, KBTWSUPOC), yielded one PC for both sexes (referred to subsequently as KEELING), with high positive scores indicating a greater degree of keeling. The second, combining pattern characters, yielded one significant PC for both males and females with high positive scores reflecting the presence and extent of the ventrolateral stripe (referred to subsequently as COL_LAT). In males, in addition to COL_LAT, a second PC with high positive scores reflecting the presence and extent of the postocular stripe (referred to as COL_OC subsequently) was included.

Due to the complexity of the data, with multiple species involved, a stepwise approach was taken. First, only groups with a sample size > 4 for both males and females (referred to hereafter as “core groups”) were included in a Canonical Variate Analysis (CVA) using untransformed meristic data, and the PCs based on ordinal data. The pooled within-group covariance matrix was used for extraction. Variables that had passed among-locality screening were entered all at once and the standardized canonical coefficients were used to interpret the resulting scatter plots in terms of characters that influence the separation of groups. In order to determine the effect of colour pattern variation on the ordination, CVAs were repeated with and without the inclusion of COL_LAT and COL_OC.

In some analyses where meristic and ordinal characters alone did not give adequate resolution, mensural characters were also used. These size-correlated characters were first screened for significant among-location variation with 1-way Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA), using an appropriately correlated measure of size as the covariate. For most head measurements, this was LHEAD, but for LHEAD and TAIL, SVL was used as covariate. Characters were first transformed, if appropriate, after investigating the best fit to a linear, log, or exponential model. Characters with a significant regression coefficient between the covariate and character as well as significant between-location differences (as indicated by the probability of equality of adjusted means < 0.05), were adjusted to a common size (corresponding to grand averages of 56.4 cm SVL and 30.5 mm LHEAD) using the pooled within-group slope from the ANCOVA prior to inclusion in the CVA.

Canonical Variates resulting from the above analyses were imported into ArcGIS Pro v3.2.1 and the Geostatistical Wizard was used to interpolate a raster surface from group centroids using simple kriging (chosen using the “Exploratory Interpolation” tool to automatically compare and rank candidate interpolation methods). An alternative procedure, in which the scores for specimens at the same locations were averaged, gave very similar results. The goodness of fit was examined by inspection of the semivariogram and cross-validation, and the number of lags and the model used were varied until the standard error was as small as possible and the cross-validation indicated that the predicted value regression line coincided with that of the measured values. Since contours based on group centroids may obscure variation at contact zones, which may be very informative about reproductive barriers between putative species, we also plotted individual scores on the canonical variates by latitude and/or longitude, depending on the predominant patterns shown by individual variates.

Finally, in order to examine the usefulness of colour pattern as a taxonomic character, as it frequently dominates recent species diagnoses, we performed correlations between the CVs and the COL_LAT (both sexes) and COL_OC (males).

Results

Mitochondrial phylogeny

Our final mtDNA dataset consisted of 312 ingroup sequences and 16 outgroup sequences. MrBayes trace files showed that 3 out of 4 runs had converged on the same likelihood, and ESS values were all >> 200. Burn-in was set to 35% to allow for longer time to convergence in one of the runs, and the remaining generations in each run were manually combined. Bayesian trees (Fig. 3; File S5A, B) and ML trees (File S5A, C) were found to be largely concordant. Deeper nodes were generally poorly supported, particularly in the ML tree. Although most species groups previously reported were strongly supported in at least one method, including albolabris sensu stricto (PP = 0.93), the purpureomaculatus species group (­aSH-LRT = 99.4, UFB = 99; PP = 0.93), and the insularis species group (0.98), neither the BI nor the ML trees supported T. caudornatus as part of the septentrionalis group. In addition, the ML tree did not support the insularis group (aSH-LRT = 100, UFB = 66) as a monophyletic clade, and neither method supported the albolabris species group as monophyletic (aSH-LRT = 71.3, UFB = 56; PP = 0.63).

Figure 3. 

A Phylogenetic tree of the Trimeresurus albolabris complex produced using Bayesian inference on a concatenated alignment of three mitochondrial gene fragments (16S rRNA: 485 bp, cyt b: 1017 bp, ND4: 659 bp). Filled black dots at nodes indicate high support in both BI (PP > 80%) and ML trees (UFB > 95% and aSH-LRT > 80%) for colour coded-clades and major sub-clades, while hollow dots indicate strong support from only one method. Outgroups are not shown B Correspondence between mitochondrial clades (M) and species allocation (S) in Vogel et al. (2023). Note that Vogel et al. (2023) did not include the insularis and purpureomaculatus groups in their analysis C Discrepancies in geographical distribution of mitochondrial clades in this study (compare with Fig. 2). Better resolution through increased sampling in Indochina allowed division of “cf. albolabris 2” of Vogel et al. (2023) into two distinct subclades (cf. albolabris 2A and 2B). There are also discrepancies in clade allocations in the regions circled in red (see text for details).

Analysis of the septentrionalis species group

Within this group, clades corresponding to the species T. uetzi, T. caudornatus, T. septentrionalis, and T. salazar are strongly supported in the BI tree (PP > 0.99) and the ML tree (aSH-LRT = 100, UFB = 100), with the exception that one sample from GenBank, V39, is not supported as part of the septentrionalis clade in either tree. Also of note is that T. uetzi specimens from Myanmar fall into two well-differentiated groups separated by long branch lengths, one corresponding to samples from the Sagaing, Magway, and Chin Divisions and the other largely to specimens from the Mandalay and Bago Divisions, although a single specimen from Magway also groups with these. Finally, specimens from Shan State, on the Thai border, attributed to T. uetzi by Vogel et al. (2023), were not part of the septentrionalis group at all but grouped with T. guoi from northern Thailand, with strong support for this placement in both BI and ML trees (PP = 1.0, aSH-LRT = 90.7, UFB = 99).

Analysis of the insularis species group

While in all previously published mitochondrial phylogenies, the insularis group was found to be basal to all other species group in the complex, this is not the case in either the BI or the ML tree in our analyses. In the BI tree, this group is sister to the clade comprising the purpureomaculatus and albolabris groups, albeit with poor support (PP = 0.58), while in the ML tree, it is the sister group to both the albolabris group and the purpeomaculatus group (aSH-LRT = 36.7, UFB = 93). In fact, this poor support extends throughout the group and likely reflects the small amount of variation in mitochondrial sequences in this species, which has also been noted in other studies (Priambodo et al. 2019; Reilly et al. 2019).

Analysis of the purpureomaculatus species group

The relationships in this group follow those reported by Chan et al. (2023a). While the clades corresponding to different species do not appear to be reciprocally monophyletic, this was shown to be due to possible introgressive hybridization, and whole genome analysis supported the position of the Tanintharyi Division populations (southern Myanmar) as part of T. purpureomaculatus (Chan et al. 2023a).

Analysis of the albolabris species group

The clade of T. albolabris sensu stricto comprises samples from China (Fujian, Guandong, Hong Kong, Guanxi, and Hainan Provinces) and northeastern Vietnam (Hai Duong, Cao Bang, Vin Phuc Provinces) but also some from Gia Lai Province, which extends the range of this clade further south in Vietnam than previously recognised. This clade is strongly supported in the BI tree (PP = 0.93), but only moderately in the ML tree (­aSH-LRT = 100, UFB = 68). A clade attributable to T. guoi is also strongly supported in both trees (PP = 0.99, aSH-LRT = 89.1, UFB = 99) and comprises the type specimens from Yunnan, China, as well as northern Thailand (Phayao, Chiang Mai, Lampang, and Loei Provinces) and Myanmar (Mon State). However, other specimens from northern and northeastern Thailand (Loei, Petchabun, Khon Kaen, Sakhon Nakhon Provinces) that are attributed to T. guoi based on the range description in Vogel et al. (2023) and Chen et al. (2021) form a distinct and separate clade. However, none of the intervening branches are strongly supported. While the Malay Peninsula population (T. cf. albolabris 1, including samples from Prachuap Khiri Khan, Petchaburi, Surat Thani, Nakhon Si Thammarat, and Trang Provinces) forms a distinct and well-supported clade (PP =1, aSH-LRT = 99.6, UFB = 100), specimens from locations attributed to T. cf. albolabris 2 do not form a single clade. Instead, they form multiple smaller clades that are associated with T. albolabris sensu stricto with weak support (50 < PP < 70) and include the aforementioned northern and northeastern Thailand clade as well as samples from Bangkok, Ang Thong, Nonthaburi, Chonburi, and Sa Kaew Provinces, all samples from Cambodia (Mondolkiri, Kaôh Kong, Kâmpóng Spœ Provinces); Indonesia (Jawa Barat, Jawa Tengah Provinces), Laos (Champassak, Khammouan, Savannakhét, Xékong Provinces), and southern Vietnam (Tien Giang, Kien Giang, Ho Chi Minh, Binh Thuan , Ba Ria-Vung Tau, Kon Tum and Gia Lai Provinces).

Since relationships within the albolabris group were not well resolved, which might be partly accounted for by the large number of samples in relation to the amount of data, we carried out another analysis of just this group (with only samples from China, Indochina, Thailand, and western Java, as well as samples from Myanmar allocated to this group in the previous analysis), using the other three species groups as outgroups. Results were consistent with the previous analysis although some clades were better supported (File S5D). Based on this, we refined the distribution of mitochondrial clades as indicated in Figure 3. The main differences with previous analyses exist in non-Peninsular Thailand and neighbouring areas of Laos and Myanmar, with the inclusion of the Shan State population (previously referred to T. uetzi; Vogel et al. 2023) in the T. guoi clade, and the identification of a distinct subclade of T. cf. albolabris 2 in central and northeastern Thailand and ranging across Laos into Kon Tum Province in Vietnam (here designated as T. cf. albolabris 2A). The relationships of this subclade with both T. cf. albolabris 2B (occurring in southeastern Thailand, Cambodia, southern Vietnam as far north as Gia Lai Province, and western Java) and with T. albolabris sensu stricto are not clear, although there is weak support for a closer relationship with T. albolabris sensu stricto (PP > 0.6, aSH-LRT = 94.9, UFB = 65). There is overlap between clades in Gia Lai Province, Vietnam (one of five specimens grouped with T. albolabris sensu stricto, the rest with T. cf. albolabris 2B) and in Loei Province, Thailand (two of nine specimens grouped with T. cf. albolabris 2A, the rest with T. guoi).

Network analysis

The median-joining network of 16S (Fig. 4A) shows clearly defined clusters corresponding to T. uetzi, T. caudornatus, T. septentrionalis, T. salazar, the purpureomaculatus group (with a shared haplotype found in T. erythrurus and T. ayeyarwadyensis as well as T. purpureomaculatus), T. albolabris sensu stricto, T. insularis, and T. fasciatus. Although there are a number of related haplotypes that are exclusive to T. guoi, there is also more haplotype sharing with other clades, including T. albolabris cf. 1, 2A, and 2B.

Figure 4. 

A Median-joining network of the 16S mitochondrial gene fragment B Haploweb based on the median-joining network of the NT3 nuclear gene, with thin curving lines connecting haplotypes found within the same individual. Nuclear haplotypes are coloured according to mitochondrial clades as in A but also include haplotypes from the macrops group, coloured in brown, which are not shared with any albolabris group species. The area of circles at nodes is proportional to the inferred frequency of that haplotype C Geographic distribution of all 169 NT3 haplotypes. Haplotypes that are private to a putative species are shown in the same colour for clarity, and species or populations that do not share haplotypes with any other are enclosed in ellipses.

A complete list of NT3 haplotypes and their distribution can be found in File S6. The haploweb based on the median joining network of NT3 (Fig. 4B) infers extensive haplotype sharing between mitochondrial clades. The most distinct were macrops group, insularis/fasciatus, and septentrionalis haplotypes, which are not shared with other groups (Fig. 4C). Interestingly, however, while most haplotypes found in T. insularis form a single cluster, several are located amongst distant clusters of albolabris group haplotypes. Trimeresurus septentrionalis haplotypes, while distinct, are closely related to purpureomaculatus group haplotypes, including T. erythrurus, T. andersoni, and T. ayeyarwadyensis and T. purpureomaculatus from Taninthyari, southern Myanmar. Extensive haplotype sharing is seen between T. caudornatus, T. uetzi, T. salazar, and T. erythrurus, and between T. ayeyarwadyensis and T. andersoni, while southern T. purpureomaculatus haplotypes are more closely related to those in the albolabris group. The most common haplotype in the albolabris group (haplotype 1), also occurs in T. uetzi and T. purpureomaculatus (Fig. 4C). The Shan State population in eastern Myanmar shares haplotypes with all three groups.

Morphological variation

Final groups and numbers of specimens in each are listed in Table 2. Raw measurements and counts for all examined specimens are listed in File S7. Thirty-three meristic characters were retained after ANOVA/Brown-Forsythe tests for significant among-locality variation in males and 34 in females (Table 3).

Table 3.

Characters that showed significant univariate among-group variation (p-values). Tests only included groups of n < 5, which varied between characters due to missing data, hence degrees of freedom (df) vary per test. Meristic characters, including all groups that met the sample size criterion, are listed under the heading ANOVA. If Levene’s test indicated that the assumption of homoscedasticity was violated, the Brown-Forsythe test was used instead (boldface values). Asterisks (*) indicate characters for which the Brown-Forsythe test could not be calculated because there were too few groups where the variance was ? 0. Sexually dimorphic characters not present in females are indicated as n/a. Mensural characters, excluding purpureomaculatus and insularis group species, are listed under the heading ANCOVA. The covariate was LHEAD in all cases, except for LHEAD and TAIL, for which the covariate was SVL.

Character acronym Males df Females df
ANOVA
VSC < 0.001 24, 139 < 0.001 20, 142
SCS < 0.001 19, 122 < 0.001 21, 154
vs29to27_PC < 0.001 24, 128 < 0.001 18, 110
vs27to25_PC 0.001 24, 133 NS -
vs25to23_PC 0.003 24, 139 < 0.001 20, 142
vs23to21_PC < 0.001 24, 139 < 0.001 20, 141
vs21to19_PC 0.013 24, 139 < 0.001 20, 142
vs19to17_PC < 0.001 24, 139 < 0.001 20, 142
vs17to15_PC < 0.001 22, 93 < 0.001 19, 128
sc14to12_PC 0.011 19, 107 n/a -
sc12to10_PC 0.001 20, 115 < 0.001 21, 152
sc10to8_PC 0.002 20, 114 < 0.001 21, 152
sc8to6_PC < 0.001 20, 114 < 0.001 21, 152
sc6to4_PC 0.001 20, 114 < 0.001 21, 153
dv29to27 0.045 19, 122 NS 19, 133
dv27to25 NS 19, 122 0.004 19, 133
dv21to19 0.002 19, 122 < 0.001 21, 154
dv19to17 0.008 18, 113 0.008 21, 154
dv12to10 NS 18, 118 < 0.001 20, 146
dv10to8 < 0.001 18, 118 < 0.001 20, 146
SUPLAB < 0.001 19, 122 < 0.001 20, 146
INFLAB < 0.001 19, 122 0.013 20, 146
POSTOC 0.002 17, 109 NS 20, 146
BORSUPOC NS 19, 122 < 0.001 20, 146
BTWSUPOC1 NS 19, 122 < 0.001 20, 146
BTWSUPOC2 < 0.001 19, 122 < 0.001 20, 146
NASPIT NS 18, 118 < 0.001 17, 130
LABNAS 0.019 18, 118 < 0.001 19, 140
INTNAS < 0.001* 18, 118 0.019 14, 115
LAB3 NS 13, 84 0.002 15, 112
LAB4 0.001 13, 84 < 0.001 16, 123
LAB5 < 0.001 15, 97 < 0.001 20, 146
SOCBORD 0.05 19, 122 0.012 20, 142
ROST 0.025 19, 114 0.003 20, 142
GENIAL 0.039 24, 139 NS 20, 142
VENTEDGE 0.001 19, 121 0.001 19, 139
KEELING < 0.001 22, 132 < 0.001 20, 139
COL_LAT < 0.001 22, 133 < 0.001 20, 141
COL_OC < 0.001 22, 133 n/a
ANCOVA
LHEAD < 0.001 13, 130 < 0.001 10, 144
TAIL NS 16, 77 < 0.001 10, 143
WHEAD1 0.002 13, 123 NS 10, 142
LSUPOC < 0.001 13, 127 < 0.001 10, 142
WSUPOC 0.001 13, 128 < 0.001 10, 141
WINTNAS 0.020 13, 125 0.041 10, 142
DEYE < 0.001 12, 105 < 0.001 9, 120
PIT2EYE NS 13.124- < 0.001 10, 139
EYE2NOS NS 13,124- 0.020 10, 139

In the analysis of core groups (Fig. 5), purpureomaculatus group species (contained in the grey ellipse) were clearly separated on CV1 in both males and females, which summarises ca. 50% of the variation and reflects vs23to21_PC (and vs19to17_PC in males) round-body scale reductions occurring closer to the vent (i.e., by the possession of > 21 midbody scale rows), and also, in males, by the possession of highly keeled scales. Individual species in the purpureomaculatus group, particularly T. erythrurus, are further separated on CV2 in males, which is primarily influenced by ventral scale counts (with higher counts towards the positive end of the axis). Ventral and subcaudal scale counts are also higher in insularis group species (in the light green ellipse), which clearly separate from the septentrionalis group on CV2 in males. However, populations currently referred to the albolabris group are not well distinguished on the first two axes in males (Fig. 5C). CV2 in females is mostly influenced by ventral and subcaudal scale counts (VSC and SCS, with both being higher at the positive end of the axis), but here there is considerable overlap between T. insularis and T. septentrionalis, and it is the populations that are clearly assignable to T. albolabris sensu stricto (from the northeastern end of the range) that are more distinguishable (pale blue polygon in Fig. 5B). A couple of specimens morphologically resemble the purpureomaculatus group more than the other specimens from the same location. These specimens, from northern Peninsular Thailand (males) and western Myanmar (females) both carry mitochondrial haplotypes of the group to which they have been assigned. These specimens have irregular scale reductions, where multiple reduction and increases occur along the anterior of the body between 23 and 21 scales round the body: the data recorded only the final reduction to 21 scales. As these specimens come from locations that are geographically close to those of the purpureomaculatus group, they may also represent hybrids. They were subsequently eliminated from further morphological analyses.

Figure 5. 

Canonical variate analysis of core groups in the Trimeresurus albolabris complex for males (A) and females (B). Trimeresurus purpureomaculatus group species (diamond shapes, grey polygons) are separated on CV1 in both sexes while CV2 separates insularis group species (square shapes, pale green polygon) in males but not in females.

Adding all specimens from the purpureomaculatus group does not change the overall ordination (File S8) and in both males and female, specimens of T. cantori and T. andersoni cluster with other purpureomaculatus group species as expected, with T. cantori similar to T. erythrurus on the first two axes but separating from it on CV3 (not shown). However, a specimen of “T. andersoni” listed in the description of T. davidi as having a doubtful locality record (Chandramouli et al. 2020) clearly falls within the albolabris group and has correctly been referred to T. davidi. Vogel et al. (2023) extended the range of T. davidi to the Andamans based on this specimen. However, it is almost certainly not found there (S.R. Chandramouli, personal communication, 16 January 2024). In females, only one out of the three paratypes of T. davidi group as expected, with the other two appearing to be closer to the purpureomaculatus group cluster on CV1 as VS23to19_PC in these specimens is considerably higher. Specimens from the Central Nicobars attributed to T. mutabilis by Vogel et al. (2014) also appear to be members of the albolabris rather than the purpureomaculatus group. Their genetic affinities, as in the case of T. davidi, are unknown.

The analysis of core groups in males (including all albolabris and septentrionalis group locations with more than four males and females and all insularis group locations) is shown in Figure 6A. Coloured polygons indicate populations that are clearly assignable to the three species: blue for Trimeresurus albolabris sensu stricto (defined by populations unambiguously assigned in the mitochondrial analysis, including all groups from China, which include the type locality, and northeastern Vietnam), green for T. insularis (Lesser Sunda Islands and eastern Java), and maroon for T. septentrionalis (including groups from western Nepal and northwestern India, which can be straightforwardly allocated to T. septentrionalis, as no other species is known to occur in this westernmost extent of the distribution). Trimeresurus albolabris is distinguished from the other two by lower SCS and keeling, and higher VS19to17_PC and SC10to8_PC. Despite the clear distinction between the three former subspecies of T. albolabris, a number of groups fall outside of the three ellipses encompassing these three species, suggesting further diversity in the T. albolabris and T. septentrionalis complexes. When colour pattern was included, distinction between the three main taxa improved through a strong contribution of the extent of ventrolateral striping to CV1 (not shown). In particular, it increased the separation of T. insularis from specimens currently referred to T. albolabris but which are distinct from T. albolabris sensu stricto. Figure 6B shows the corresponding analysis of females, which resembles that of the males, with similar characters separating T. insularis from T. albolabris and T. septentrionalis. However, COL_LAT loads highly only on CV3 when included and does not affect the distinction between the three main species to any extent (not shown).

Figure 6. 

Canonical variate analysis of the core groups (with sample sizes of n > 4 in both males and females) in the Trimeresurus albolabris, septentrionalis, and insularis groups (excluding mensural and colour pattern characters). Populations that can definitively be assigned to the nominate species are enclosed in a coloured ellipse (T. albolabris: blue, T. septentrionalis: red, T. insularis: green). While these are distinguished from each other, many intervening populations clearly fall outside these clusters.

In order to further investigate the putative taxa as yet undefined, we combined locations in the blue and maroon coloured polygons in Figure 6 into single groups corresponding to T. albolabris sensu stricto and T. septentrionalis sensu stricto, and for greater discriminating power also included adjusted mensural characters that were significantly different between core groups (Table 3). However, as measurements close to the eye were not done in live animals, DEYE and PIT2EYE were not used in order to maximise the retention of specimens in the analysis. In Figure 7A (males), T. albolabris and T. septentrionalis are clearly distinguished along CV1 (27.2%), corresponding to a lower number of ventral scales and scale reductions from 19 to 17 on the body (vs19to17_PC) and 10 to 8 on the tail (vs10to8_PC) occurring closer to the vent in T. albolabris. Specimens from the intervening area show intermediate values on CV1. On the second axis (15.9%), the main distinction is between western locations (corresponding to T. septentrionalis) and more southern locations in Thailand and (in bold type) Indochina. However, locations in northern Myanmar and southwestern China resemble T. septentrionalis, and these correspond almost perfectly to the range of T. caudornatus. On the other hand, the intervening contrasted area in Bangladesh, northeastern India, and eastern Nepal, corresponds roughly to the range of T. salazar. Characters with the strongest influence on this axis are a higher degree of keeling, more scales between the fourth and fifth supralabial scale (LAB4, LAB5), and a position of the reduction from 8 to 6 scales (SC8to6_PC) that occurs closer to the vent in Thailand/Indochina. The third axis (10.8%) distinguishes populations in central Vietnam and southern and central Laos and including to a lesser extent populations in a band stretching across northeastern and western Thailand. These have shorter supraocular scales (LSUPOC) and more scales bordering the subocular scale (SOCBORD), contrasting with populations in Myanmar (particularly northern and western) and central Thailand.

Table 4.

Canonical variate loadings (pooled within-group correlations between discriminating variable and standardised canonical discriminant functions). High positive scores correspond to red and high negative scores to blue colours in Figure 7. Characters that contribute most to each axis (in bold type) are similar but not identical between males (M) and females (F).

Character acronym M F
CV1
VSC 0.310 0.413
vs19to17_PC 0.254 –0.166
sc12to10_PC 0.215 –0.139
sc10to8_PC 0.266 0.263
CV2
KEELING 0.206 –0.212
LAB4 0.273 –0.148
LAB5 0.357 –0.187
sc8to6_PC –0.185 0.251
LHEAD 0.082 0.398
TAIL 0.246
CV3
SOCBORD 0.208 0.038
LSUPOC 0.216 0.217
SCS 0.159 0.398
KEELING –0.181 0.211
Figure 7. 

Morphological trends in the Trimeresurus albolabris complex. Contours were generated in ArcGIS Pro v3.2, interpolated using ordinary kriging using group centroids from a canonical variate analysis including all character types except colour pattern. Country boundaries (in black) and ocean vector layers were downloaded from Natural Earth (naturalearthdata.com) at 1:10 m resolution. Note that the extent of contoured area does not reflect the range of the species. Characters that contribute to the canonical variates vary slightly between males and females and are listed in Table 4.

In females, the results are largely similar (Fig. 7B) although distinctions are less pronounced and, in particular, fail to highlight the distinctness of central Vietnam populations. Similar characters contribute most to the separation of albolabris and septentrionalis groups on CV1 (23.8%) as in males. However, CV2 (18.4%) mainly distinguishes a southern Thailand/Indochina group from central/western Myanmar (which, as in males, corresponds to the putative range of T. uetzi) by relative head and tail length and the scale reduction from 8 to 6 (­SC8to6_PC) on the tail. The contrast on CV3 is mainly between northwestern populations (including the range of T. septentrionalis but extending further east into northeastern India, northern Myanmar and southwestern China), and central/western Myanmar populations, and is largely due to a lower subcaudal scale count (SCS), more keeled scales, and longer supraocular scale (LSUPOC) in the northwestern group.

Individual scores plotted against longitude are shown in Figure 8. In males, specimens from most populations in Myanmar, apart from Shan State, resemble T. septentrionalis along CV1 and CV3. Populations from northern Myanmar, attributable to T. caudornatus, are differentiated from the rest along CV2, while specimens attributed to T. salazar are similar to central and western Myanmar on all three axes. At the other end of the range, T. albolabris sensu stricto is clearly distinct from other populations currently referred to this species, apart from a single specimen from Lang Biang (Vietnam) and one from southern Myanmar (Mon State). While also grouping with T. albolabris sensu stricto along CV2, together with specimens from central Laos and Krong Pa Province, Vietnam, the Lang Biang Mountain population is differentiated along CV3. A group comprising specimens from northern Thailand (to the northeast of Chiang Mai, Thailand), northern Peninsular Thailand and southeastern Thailand/Cambodia, central Laos, and central Vietnam, together with most specimens from central Thailand, are seen on CV2 with scores > 2. These groups do not correspond to mitochondrial clades: for example, the latter have mitochondrial haplotypes belonging to T. guoi and T. cf. albolabris 1, 2A, and 2B.

Figure 8. 

Plot of canonical variate scores from the analysis pictured in Figure 7 against longitude, showing variation in scores in each group (males). Trimeresurus septentrionalis group species are plotted with triangular symbols in shades of red, while albolabris group species are plotted with circular symbols in shades of blue. Trimeresurus septentrionalis sensu stricto includes specimens from central/western Nepal and the western Himalayas in India, while T. albolabris sensu stricto includes specimens from China (including the island of Hainan) and northeastern Vietnam (as determined in the analysis in Fig. 6). Overlap in morphology between geographically proximate populations may be indicative of current gene flow.

In females (File S9) CV1 also contrasts T. septentrionalis and T. albolabris but the specimens that stand out the most are from the Sankamphaeng Mountains, Thailand (which encompasses Khao Yai National Park and the Sakaerat Biosphere Reserve), also relatively distinct in males. Also of interest here is the complete overlap of Shan State and southern Myanmar specimens with those from northern Myanmar. Again, this pattern may be indicative of cytonuclear discordance as they fall into different major clades in the mitochondrial tree. At the eastern end of the range, specimens from central Laos and the Bolaven Plateau in southern Laos, central Vietnam, and the Lang Biang plateau group with T. albolabris sensu stricto. These groupings are maintained in CV2 with the exception that, in this case, only the Lang Biang specimens overlap with T. albolabris sensu stricto, together with northern Laos, while the southern Myanmar populations are also differentiated from Shan State and northern Myanmar. The longitudinal pattern in CV3 is less clear, but it does distinguish between T. uetzi from western and central Myanmar, and T. caudornatus from northern Myanmar and adjacent areas of China. Specimens from Shan and Mon States in Myanmar fall in between these groups and overlap with other T. guoi mitochondrial haplotypes from northern and northeastern Thailand.

The best evidence in this study for a distinct taxon requiring a name involves a subset of populations referred to by Vogel et al. (2023) as “cf. albolabris” 1 and 2 (i.e., the more southerly populations in the Malay Peninsula in Thailand, southeastern Thailand and southern Cambodia to the Mekong Delta in Vietnam, and western Java) that are relatively distinct in the mitochondrial phylogeny, possess a large number of private NT3 haplotypes, and show morphological separation (most obviously along CV2). Because they share haplotypes with T. albolabris sensu stricto and populations currently referred to T. guoi and seem to intergrade with these over a large area (e.g., northern and northeastern Thailand, central Laos and central Vietnam), they appear to be more conservatively treated as subspecies rather than completely separated, independently evolving lineages. The name Bothrops viridis var. fario Jan,1859, currently a junior synonym of T. albolabris, is available for this taxon. ?We herein provide a redescription of this taxon and designate a neotype to stabilize the taxonomy of the group.

The nomenclatural status of Bothrops viridis var. fario Jan, 1859

Savage and McDiarmid (2017) and Mallik et al. (2021) included Bothrops fario Jan, 1859 in the synonymy of Craspedocephalus gramineus and considered it a nomen nudum. While the combination Trigonocephalus fario appeared first in Jan (1859a: 154) as a true nomen nudum, lacking a description, Jan (1859b: 30; Plate E: unnumbered figure) mentioned Bothrops fario (as Bothrops viridis var. fario in the caption to the figure) with the type locality given as “Java”. A specimen from Java does not represent Craspedocephalus gramineus, a species confined to India. While Jan did not provide any description, based on Art. 12.2.7 of the Code (ICZN 1999), the proposal of this new species-group name in association with an illustration of the taxon renders the combination Bothrops fario (or Bothrops viridis fario) available and it therefore cannot be considered a nomen nudum. The figure of the plate, showing the head of the holotype, especially the first subcaudal united to the nasal scale, and the type locality (Java Island) identifies this taxon as a junior synonym of T. albolabris (Gray, 1842).

While T. insularis is also present in eastern Java, there are several reasons to consider the nomen fario attributable to the taxon T. albolabris. Jan’s figure clearly depicts a male with a prominent postocular stripe and a much lighter shade on the head beneath this stripe than above, features rarely seen in T. insularis. Furthermore, there is a single scale between the third supralabial and postocular scale, a condition that is never observed in T. insularis but is sometimes observed in the T. albolabris populations from this area. Finally, a specimen collected around 1858 is more likely to originate from the region of Jakarta or Bogor in western Java. The specimen depicted on Plate E was an unnumbered specimen in the Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Milano (Milan, Italy) and, along with most of Jan’s voucher specimens, was destroyed by Allied bombing during World War II (?Savage and McDiarmid 2017: 49). According to Art. 75.3.1 of the Code (ICZN 1999), we designate a neotype to objectively link this nomen to the taxon that includes the population from western Java and provide a description of the specimen designated and a statement of characters that differentiate it from other similar taxa (Yanega et al. 2018).

Designation of a neotype for Bothrops viridis var. fario Jan, 1859

Article 75 of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN 1999) permits the designation of a neotype when specific qualifying conditions are met, and in this section we present the relevant declarations. To satisfy the conditions of Article 75.3.1, we affirm that it is necessary to clarify the type locality of this taxon as two closely related taxa occur in Java, the original type locality for this nomen. To satisfy the conditions of Article 75.3.2, we refer the reader to the detailed redescription of this taxon (see below). Article 75.3.3 is satisfied by the specific information about the specimen in that same section. To satisfy the conditions of Article 75.3.4, we hereby declare that we have unsuccessfully attempted to locate the type of T. albolabris fario by requesting information regarding their status from the curatorial staff at the Museo Civico Di Storia Naturale, Milan, Italy. It is understood that the syntypes were destroyed in the Allied bombing raids on Milan in 1943, and it is not listed among the type material currently in the reptile collections there (Scali 2010). Consistent with the requirements of Article 75.3.5 and 75.3.6, the proposed neotype (NMW 23902:5, collected in January 1928 by F. Kopstein at 350 m elevation in Tasikmalaya, Java, Indonesia) is an adult male specimen collected in western Java. In accordance with Article 75.3.7, it is the property of a recognized scientific institution, the Naturhistorisches Museum Wien, Vienna, Austria, that maintains a research collection, with proper facilities for preserving name-bearing types, and that makes them accessible for study.

Taxonomy

Trimeresurus albolabris fario Jan, 1859, comb. nov.

Figures 9, 10, 11; Tables 5, 6

Trigonocephalus fario Jan, 1859: 154 (nomen nudum, Jan 1859a)

Bothrops viridis var. fario Jan, 1859: 30; plate E: unnumbered figure. Type locality. “Java” (Jan 1859b).

Bothrops (Trigonocephalus) viridis var. farioJan (1863): 127

Neotype.

NMW 23902:5 (male) collected by F. Kopstein in January 1928 at 350 m elevation in Tasikmalaya, Java, Indonesia.

Referred material.

FMNH 259115 (female) and FMNH 259116 (male), collected on 6 November 2000 by B.L. Stuart at An Minh B?c, U Minh Thu?ng National Park, U Minh Thu?ng District, Kiên Giang, Vietnam (9°35’04.0”N, 105°05’27.0”E); FMNH 259117 (female) collected on 9 November 2000 by B.L. Stuart at An Minh B?c, U Minh Thu?ng National Park, U Minh Thu?ng District, Kiên Giang, Vietnam (9°36’30”N, 105°05’58”E); FMNH 259189 (male), collected on 22 September 2004 by B.L. Stuart in Kirirom National Park, Phnom Sruoch District, Kampong Speu Province, Cambodia (11°19’53N; 104°04’53”E; elevation 700 m); FMNH 263377 (female) collected on 13 July 2003 by D. Emmett and H. Namyi at the Jar site in the Areng Valley, Thma Bang District, Koh Kong Province, Cambodia (11°28’48.1”N, 103°24’12.0”E, elevation 800 m); FMNH 179412 collected on 28 October 1957 by E.H. Taylor in Phra Nakhon, Bangkok, Thailand (13°45'52"N, 100°29'57"E); CAS 111407 (female), collected on 1 January 1961 by H.A. Fehlmann along the Siemreap-Arranya highway in the vicinity of Sisophon, Battambang Province, Cambodia (ca. 13°19’N; 103°04’E); NMHUK 1988:780, 787–789 (females) collected in May 1985 by D.A. Warrell at Trang, Thailand; MHNG 11534 (female), collected in 1929 by R.L. Bourret in Kampot, Cambodia (10°36'N, 104°10'E; elevation 25 m); NMW 23902:1–2, 4, 10 (two males, two females) collected between November 1927 and April 1928 by F. Kopstein (in Tasikmalaya, Java, Indonesia (7°18'58"S, 108°11'51"E, elevation 350 m); NMBA 9477–78 (females) collected in 1927 by F. Kopstein in Tasikmalaya, Java; LKCNHM 2.2862 (female) collected in May 1930 in Indramajoe (Indramayu), Java; NMBA 2588 (male) collected in 1886 in Cochin China; NHMUK 1937.2.1.27 (male) donated by M.A. Smith from Saigon (Ho Chi Minh City), Vietnam (10°46'32"N, 106°42'07"E).

Additional material.

Eight males collected in 1998 by P.P. van Dijk and A. Malhotra among pineapple plantations on the road to Pala-U Waterfall, Hua Hin District, Prachuap Khiri Khan, Thailand (ca. 12°31’49”N, 99°32’02”E); one female from Surat Thani, Thailand (ca. 8°52’N; 99°21’33”E); one male from Trang, Thailand (near 7°32’35”N; 99°44’54”E), both collected in 1992 by A. Malhotra and R.S. Thorpe (all released after recording data); two roadkilled females collected in 1991 by W. Wüster and J.C. Daltry near Bang Phra, Chonburi, Thailand (ca. 13°17’40”N, 100°59’13”E); five males and seven females from Bangkok, Ang Thong, and Nonthaburi Provinces, Thailand in the live collection of the QSMI; one female from the vicinity of Thung Song, Thailand in the live collection of the QSMI; nine females and two males from the vicinity of Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, purchased from snake wine dealers by T.-X. Ki?m.

Diagnosis.

Trimeresurus albolabris fario can be distinguished from T. a. albolabris by the following combination of characters (see Table 5 for values): (a higher number of ventral and subcaudal scales; a tendency to have more scales between the 4th and 5th supralabial scales and the subocular scale; narrower internasal scales, less keeled body and head scales, and scale reductions around the tail occurring closer to the vent in both males and females. Additionally, females have relatively longer heads and tails.

Table 5.

Comparison between characters that distinguish Trimeresurus a. fario and T. a. albolabris. Characters are arranged in order of importance in discriminating between the two subspecies. Note that KEELING and COL_OC/LAT are composite characters that represent the extent of keeling on head and body scales (with positive values indicating more keeling), and postocular and ventrolateral stripes respectively (with high positive scores indicating more obvious stripes). Measurements are adjusted to overall average SVL (see text for further information). Populations in areas of apparent intergradation were excluded.

Character T. a. fario T. a. albolabris
Mean 95% CI Mean 95% CI
Males
n 17 30
SC10to8_PC 8.33 7.0–9.7 13.46 12.0–14.9
LAB5 1.7 1.5–1.9 1.2 1.0–1.3
SCS 70.4 69.0–71.8 66.8 66.0–67.6
SC8to6_PC 21.2 18.2–24.2 28.9 26.8–31.0
POSTOC 2.5 2.5–2.8 1.9 1.8–2.1
VSC 162.3 160.2–164.3 157.5 156.4–158.6
SC12to10_PC 4.1 3.2–5.0 6.6 5.7–7.5
WINTNAS_adj 2.7 2.6–2.8 2.9 2.8–3.0
SUPLAB 11.0 10.6–11.4 10.3 10.1–10.5
LAB4 1.3 1.1–1.5 1.0 0.9–1.0
KEELING -0.21 -0.41– -0.01 -0.47 -0.67– -0.28
Females
n 23 38
SC10to8_PC 7.4 6.8–7.9 11.99 11.1–12.9
SC8to6_PC 15.1 12.8–17.3 24.9 22.9–27.0
SCS 58.1 56.6–59.6 53.4 52.4–54.4
SC12to10_PC 4.0 3.5–4.6 6.0 5.3–6.7
TAIL_adj 10.4 10.1–10.4 9.7 9.4–10.0
LHEAD_adj 30.8 30.2–31.3 29.5 28.9–30.1
LAB5 1.7 1.6–1.9 1.4 1.2–1.5
WINTNAS_adj 2.5 2.3–2.6 2.7 2.6–2.9
POSTOC 2.2 2.1–2.3 1.9 1.8–2.0
VSC 161.9 160.2–163.7 159.6 158.7–160.5
LAB4 1.2 1.1–1.4 1.1 1.0–1.2
KEELING -0.19 -0.5–0.1 –0.39 -0.5– -0.3
SUPLAB 11.0 10.7–11.3 10.8 10.6–10.9

Etymology.

The subspecific epithet fario is a Latinised masculine singular noun in apposition. In the species account for Salmo Fario, Linnaeus (1758: 309) referenced entry No. 309 in the first edition of his earlier volume Fauna Suecica (Linnaeus 1746). This is the fourth of five entries for fishes of the type “Salmo”, where he listed the Ichthyologia by Stephan von Schönefeld (1624) as a source for the word Forio. Schönefeld (1624: 77) provided as a source for this term the German word Fohre, a descriptive term for the common stream salmonid derived from the proto-Germanic language, meaning “speckled”. Thus, Linnaeus’s name forio comes from a misspelled, Latinised, proto-Germanic term. The meaning “salmon trout” (Lewis and Short 1879) is a much later attribution. Without any speckling on the body of T. albolabris, Jan perhaps referenced the brownish colour that specimens of this species can attain on preservation. Alternatively, the mottled red colouration frequently found on the tail of specimens of T. albolabris may have resembled the red spots on the flanks of some trout.

Suggested common name.

Southern white-lipped pitviper.

Description of neotype.

163 ventrals, 73 paired subcaudals, 11/10 supralabials (right/left), 13 infralabials, two postoculars, internasals in contact, no scales between the nasal scale and the fused loreal and second supralabial scale that form the anterior edge of the pit, a minimum of ten scales between the supraoculars, and 12 between their inner rear edges, 6/7 scales touch the subocular (not counting pre- or postoculars), including the third infralabial scale, which is the largest. There is one scale between the fourth and two scales between the fifth infralabial and the subocular scale on the right side and one scale between both the fourth and fifth infralabial scale and the subocular on the left side. The first supralabial is partially fused with the scale surrounding the nostril. Upper body scale rows, temporal scales and scales on rear upper surface of head moderately keeled. There are 21 scale rows at midbody; the scale reduction formula is shown in Table 6:

Table 6.

Scale reduction formula on the A body and B tail.

A 29 6+7 (7) 27 3+4 (9) 25 5+6 (10) 23 5+6 (17) 21 4+5 (106) 19 4+5 (113) 17 4+5 (124) 15
6+7 (7) 4+5 (9) 5+6 (11) 5+6 (17) 4+5 (107) 4+5 (111) 4+5 (123)
B 14 6+7 (1) 12 2+3 (2) 10 3+4 (5) 8 3+4 (20) 6 2+3 (61) 4
5+6 (2) 2+3 (1) 4+5 (6) 3+4 (19) 2+3 (54)

Five palatine, 13 pterygoid, and 12 dentary teeth. SVL 49.8 cm + tail length 14.1 cm = total length 63.9 cm. Hemipenis retractor muscle inserts at subcaudal 58; hemipenis forked at about 15% of total length (measured in situ), the majority of the forked part with calyces extending from a short distance above the fork to the tips. The basal region below the fork bare, with soft papillate processes present. Colouration in preservative (Fig. 9): lateral surface of head below the eye, supralabial scales, 1–2 scales above supralabials and ventral surface considerably lighter than the upper part of the head; dorsal surface of head and body similarly uniformly coloured, a light ventrolateral stripe covering c. 40% of the first scale row of the body fades anteriorly and does not reach the head, no postocular streak present.

Figure 9. 

Head of the male neotype of Trimeresurus albolabris fario (Jan, 1859), NMW 23903:5. A right lateral view, B dorsal view, C ventral view. Photos by A. Malhotra.

Variation.

See Table 5 for variation in key characters.

Colouration in life.

Based on photographs of live individuals examined, as listed above. In males from Thailand, lower part of the head below the eye and the anterior ventral surface is almost pearlescent white, becoming yellow-green towards the vent (barely so in some specimens) and on the ventral surface of the tail, except for the last third of the tail, which is mottled with dark red. Postocular stripe may or may not be present; where present often extending below the eye socket onto the scales anterior to the eye. Upper part of head and body yellow-green, with a prominent white or yellow ventrolateral stripe, often edged below with a faint or more prominent dark or reddish pigment. Dorsal surface of head a darker shade of yellow-green or olive-drab. Iris goldenrod yellow to chocolate orange. Females are similar but are yellower than males, particularly on the ventral surface (although still retaining some pearlescent white mottling among the golden yellow pigment on the ventral surface of the head), while dorsally they range from olive green to dark green. A narrow white, indistinct yellow stripe or no stripe may be present on the first dorsal scale row. Males from the Mekong Delta area tend to be darker green in colour with no postocular stripe and yellow-green to olive-drab ventral surfaces, with light blue and golden yellow patches, particularly on the underside of the head, and a yellow ventrolateral stripe.

Figure 10. 

Colouration of Trimeresurus albolabris fario (males), taken under anaesthesia or immediately after euthanasia. AC Lateral, dorsal, and ventral views of the head D lateral view of midbody E ventral view of an individual from Bangkok, Thailand (field number 98.04; not euthanized) FH lateral, dorsal, and ventral views of the head I lateral view of midbody and J general ventral view of midbody of a specimen from Prachuap Khiri Khan Province, Thailand (field number 98.14; not euthanized) K Lateral view of FMNH 259116 from U Minh Thu?ng National Park, Kiên Giang, Vietnam. Photos by A. Malhotra (A–J) and B. L. Stuart (K).

Comparison.

Trimeresurus can be distinguished from all other Asian pitvipers by having at least partially fused first supralabial and nasal scales. Trimeresurus albolabris can be distinguished from T. purpureomaculatus and its relatives (T. erythrurus, T. ayeyarwadyensis, T. andersoni, and T. cantori) by having 21 scale rows at midbody and 15 scale rows just anterior to the vent compared to more than 23 and 17, respectively, and from T. insularis most obviously by the absence of a ventrolateral stripe in females, a less pronounced ventrolateral and postocular stripe in males, and more highly keeled scales in T. insularis. Both subspecies of Trimeresurus albolabris can be distinguished from T. septentrionalis and its subspecies (see Conclusion) by a lower number of ventral scales, the reduction from 21 to 19 body scale rows and from 6 to 4 caudal scale rows occurring closer to the vent, less keeled scales on body and head, and a relatively longer head in both males and females (see Table 7 for values).

Figure 11. 

Colouration of Trimerusurus albolabris fario (females), taken under anaesthesia. AC Lateral, ventral, and dorsal views of the head D lateral view of midbody E ventral view of an individual from Nonthaburi Province, Thailand (field number 98.19; not euthanized) FH lateral, dorsal, and ventral views of the head I lateral view of midbody J general ventral view of midbody of an individual from Thung Song Province, Thailand (field number 98.02; not euthanized). Photos by A. Malhotra.

Table 7.

Comparison between characters that distinguish all subspecies of Trimeresurus albolabris and T. septentrionalis (as defined herein). Characters are arranged in order of importance in the discrimination between the two species. Note that KEELING and COL_OC/LAT are composite characters that represent the extent of keeling on head and body scales (with positive values indicating more keeling), and postocular and ventrolateral stripes respectively (with high positive scores indicating more obvious stripes). Measurements are adjusted to overall average SVL (see text for further information). Populations in areas of apparent intergradation were excluded.

Character T. albolabris T. septentrionalis
Mean 95% CI Mean 95% CI
Males
n 79 35
VS19to17_PC 73.2 72.5–73.8 70.0 69.0–70.9
KEELING -0.36 -0.47– -0.24 -0.84 -0.97– -0.72
VSC 160.4 159.3–161.4 165.1 163.6–166.6
VS21to19_PC 66.8 65.7–68.0 60.6 55.8–65.5
COL_OC -0.28 -0.51– -0.04 0.55 0.24–0.85
LAB5 1.4 1.3–1.5 1.2 1.1–1.3
LHEAD_adj 27.2 27.2–28.0 26.4 25.6–27.3
INFLAB 12.5 12.3–12.7 12.1 11.9–12.3
SC6to4_PC 58.7 55.5–62.0 65.2 59.6–70.8
WSUPOC_adj 1.8 1.7–1.9 1.9 1.8–2.0
Females
n 97 30
VSC 161.4 160.6–162.3 168.8 167.2–170.3
INTNAS 0.10 0.04–0.17 0.57 0.33–0.8
KEELING -0.29 -0.4– -0.19 -0.81 -1.05– -0.57
LAB3 0.20 0.12–0.28 0.55 0.37–0.73
COL_LAT 0.25 0.04–0.45 -0.45 -0.74– -0.15
LHEAD_adj 30.6 30.1–31.0 29.5 28.8–30.1
PIT2EYE_adj 1.7 1.6–1.7 1.8 1.8–1.9
VS21to19_PC 67.0 66.5–67.5 65.7 64.3–67.1
BORSUPOC 7.9 7.7–8.0 7.6 7.3–7.8
LABNAS 0.75 0.7–0.8 0.63 0.55–0.71
SC6to4_PC 56.0 53.4–58.5 62.9 58.2–67.6

Distribution and natural history.

Trimeresurus a. fario generally occupies lowland areas in the more southerly part of the distribution of T. albolabris, including the Malay Peninsula in Thailand (and possibly Myanmar, although this remains to be confirmed), the area in the vicinity of Bangkok in central Thailand, southeast Thailand, south of the Sankamphaeng Range, the area of Cambodia around the Tonle Sap and Mekong lowlands, the Mekong Delta in Vietnam, and western Java. The nominate subspecies is restricted to China (including Hainan) and the extreme northeastern part of Vietnam. Populations in Laos and central Vietnam may represent intergrades between these two subspecies of T. albolabris, while those further north and west in Thailand may intergrade with other forms. These snakes have been recorded in a range of habitats, including Melaleuca swamp forest and grassland in open pine forest (Cambodia); secondary forest, production forest, plantations, and agricultural areas in Java (Kurniawan et al. 2021); as well as agricultural areas that border lowland moist forest and semi-evergreen forest in southern Thailand (personal observation). Like other related species and subspecies of T. albolabris, it is largely arboreal but may frequently be found on low vegetation or on the ground. The IUCN lists Trimeresurus albolabris as a species of Least Concern (Stuart et al. 2012).

Snakebite risk.

Trimeresurus albolabris fario is relatively common and seems to adapt well to living in anthropogenic habitats. This species caused 92% of 267 snakebite cases in Can Tho Municipality (Mekong Delta, Vietnam) treated in hospitals in 2017 (Thang et al. 2020). Monovalent antivenom against T. albolabris (SAV-Tri) produced by the Institute of Vaccines and Medical Biologicals (IVAC, Pasteur Institute, Nha Trang, Khánh Hòa Province, Vietnam) was administered in 90% of these cases with full recovery, and no deaths were recorded. Similarly, a survey of snakebite in Tien Giang Province (Mekong Delta, Vietnam) showed green pitvipers to dominate, causing 92.9% of 708 recorded bites in 2012, while in Ho Chi Minh City they caused 50.9% of 1808 identifiable bites in 2011–12 (Eriksson and Nguyen 2017). In contrast, Kurniawan et al. (2021) found T. albolabris to be less frequently encountered in their 2013–19 surveys of snakes of Java than its close relative T. insularis (encounter rate 1.8% compared to 5.5%), even though its range extends through two of the three provinces of Java (West and Central) compared to one in T. insularis (East). Nevertheless, the remaining available habitat in this densely populated region is nested within urbanised areas and likely increases the risk of negative outcomes of encounters between people and vipers. The commonly available antivenom in Indonesia is Biosave, produced by Biofarma Pharmaceuticals (Bandung, Indonesia), a polyvalent antivenom and indicated for bites by Naja sputatrix, Bungarus fasciatus, and Calloselasma rhodostoma (Adiwinata and Nelwan 2015). However, Thai Green Pitviper Antivenom (GPAV) more effectively cross-neutralizes the procoagulant effect of the venom of T. insularis and T. purpureomaculatus (Tan et al. 2017) than Biosave (between 36 and 54 times more effective). Yong et al. (2021) also demonstrated cross-reactivity across a diverse range of pitvipers belonging to the Trimeresurus complex, hence it is very likely to also be effective against bites by T. albolabris fario. Both GPAV and SAV-Tri are also unofficially available in Laos according to Patikorn et al. (2022). Very limited information on snakebite is available for Cambodia (Williams et al. 2009), but none of the antivenoms available in 2009 were suitable for treatment of green pitviper bite.

Discussion

Combining lines of evidence

Our study provides the first clear and comprehensive evidence supporting the separation of several species within Trimeresurus. There is clear separation between the purpureomaculatus group species and the rest, with separate clusters seen in both the mitochondrial phylogeny as well as the morphometric analysis. There is also clear morphological distinction between T. insularis, T. septentrionalis, and T. albolabris, which we describe as the “core” species of the albolabris complex. However, other species, described more recently based largely on mitochondrial phylogenies, show more subtle morphological differences and we suggest that it is no coincidence that many of them occur on the boundary where populations more closely related to T. septentrionalis (i.e., central and northern Myanmar) and T. albolabris (i.e., eastern and southern Myanmar, northern and western Thailand) come into contact. A mismatch between mitochondrial haplotypes and morphological affinities between many individuals from populations in the intervening regions suggests cytonuclear discordance, one potential cause of which is introgression through continuing gene flow, as demonstrated for T. erythrurus, T. ayeyarwadyensis, and T. purpureomaculatus (Chan et al. 2023a, 2023b). This is underscored by extensive haplotype sharing in the nuclear NT3 gene in Myanmar and surrounding regions, although this may also be a consequence of incomplete lineage sorting given the low variation in this gene (19% of sites variable across all haplotypes sampled and a per-site nucleotide diversity of 0.01267). Meanwhile, many of the diagnostic characters of these newer species are called into question through misinterpretation of key characters or lack of recognition of variability in either the new taxon or the species to which they are compared (discussed below in the section headed “Effectiveness of morphological characters in differentiating Trimeresurus species”).

Cytonuclear discordance

While the mitochondrial clades recovered in this study are largely consistent with other studies (Zhu et al. 2016; Chen et al. 2021), more extensive sampling has resulted in shifts in the geographic ranges of many clades. However, a few specimens have ambiguous and unexpected positions. In the septentrionalis group, the position of specimen V39 referred to T. septentrionalis is strongly supported in the BI tree as part of the T. septentrionalis clade, whereas in the ML tree, it is part of the T. uetzi clade. On querying the location with the authors of these sequences, it transpired that the location given in the GenBank record is erroneous, and this sample is in fact from an unknown location in northeastern India (personal communication, Karthikeyan Vasudevan, 11 July 2022). Its ambiguous position may be due to sequence errors but may also indicate a distinct taxon in this relatively underexplored region (e.g., Biakzuala et al. 2024; Gerard et al. 2024). In the T. insularis clade, two specimens (from West Timor and Komodo) appear somewhat divergent from other sequences. However, neither of these locations were collected by the authors. Their sequences do not appear to be erroneous, although accidental amplification of NUMTs cannot be ruled out despite their appearance as bona fide coding sequences (Marshall and Parsons 2021).

Extensive haplotype sharing across most of the nuclear network is consistent with either retention of ancestral haplotypes, or with continuing gene flow, or a mixture of both. Most populations are in current or recent (Pleistocene) contact. However, it is unlikely that T. andersoni from the Andaman Islands is still exchanging genes with mainland populations. In addition, the presumably large population sizes of these species would favour retention of ancestral haplotypes (Xie and Zhang 2006). It is worth noting that no physical impediments to interbreeding are present as the whole group share a similar, highly derived hemipenis. In the case of T. salazar and T. uetzi, descriptions to the contrary were based on incompletely everted hemipenes, as verified by dissection (see below and File S10). Some hobbyists interbreed different species of the T. albolabris complex (such as T. insularis, T. albolabris, T. fasciatus, and T. purpureomaculatus) to produce viable and fertile hybrids, indicating lack of reproductive barriers among the species within this group (e.g., https://blog.robertthompsonphotography.com/2016/05/05/pit-vipers) and it would not take many such events in nature to produce the haplotype mixing seen in the nuclear network. Partial panmixia is not necessarily incompatible with the species status of the newly described species (Nosil 2008). However, occasional interbreeding may also cause introgression of mitochondrial haplotypes from one species into another, and hence mitochondrial clade distributions may not reflect species distributions (Renoult et al. 2009; Duran et al. 2024). It is likely that this complex presents a case of a species continuum in which populations are at different stages of speciation. Species delimitation in such situations is particularly challenging (DeRaad et al. 2022; Dufresnes et al. 2023). Most time-calibrated trees that include these pitvipers place divergence events between major lineages to have occurred within the last 6.6 MY (CI 2.6–14.3 MY; www.timetree.org), which corresponds to the split between T. albolabris and T. insularis. Sea-level changes during this period may have allowed initial colonisation of the southerly areas of the Sunda Shelf during periods of lower sea levels, divergence in isolation during periods of higher sea level, and subsequent recolonization of what now seems like a disjunct distribution. The absence of white-lipped pitvipers from the southern Malay Peninsula can be explained by their apparent preference for more seasonal climatic zones.

Unresolved morphological variation

We have highlighted a population from the Sankamphaeng Mountains in Thailand (which form the southwestern boundary of the Khorat Plateau and separate northeastern Thailand from the central plains) that appear morphologically very divergent from surrounding populations on several axes. This location (based on specimens collected by Robert Inger at Sakaerat Experimental Station in the 1970s) has not yet been included in phylogenetic analyses despite being the subject of recent ecological investigations (Barnes et al. 2017) and deserves further investigation. Another region distinguished in the morphometric analysis includes central Vietnam and southern and central Laos. These populations have not been identified as distinct by any publication to date and only partially correspond to the mitochondrial clade we call T. cf. albolabris 2B, which also includes populations sampled from around Bangkok in central Thailand. Thi Hanh et al. (2022) showed that T. albolabris in these countries were grouped into two distinct clades in a tree based on the CO1 gene. The first (their Group 1) is from northern locations in the vicinity of Hanoi (and corresponds to T. albolabris sensu stricto in our analysis) while the second (their Group 2) was said to be located in central and southern Vietnam from Quang Nai Province as far south as the Mekong Delta (Kien Giang Province). However, these groupings are contradicted by the locations of specimens attributed to them as several from Group 2 are from the same location (an island in Halong Bay) as specimens in Group 1. Thus, the two clades do not seem to be geographically separated. While no direct comparison is possible, as we did not use the CO1 gene in this study, we did not find evidence of central and southern Vietnam haplotypes in northern Vietnam and morphologically the affinities of populations from northeastern Vietnam were unambiguously with T. albolabris sensu stricto.

Effectiveness of morphological characters in differentiating Trimeresurus species

Colour

Many recent descriptions of new species specifically include hue characteristics in diagnoses. Several of these are based on examination of relatively few specimens from single locations and not all may prove to be diagnostic when extended throughout the putative species’ range. For example, the diagnosis of T. guoi (Chen et al. 2021) includes “iris firebrick-red in both sexes”. However, specimens sampled in Pha Yao (A229/AFS97B.1) and Loei Provinces (A165/AFS99.2) in Thailand do not have this eye colour (File S10A), despite being the basis for the inclusion of these regions in the range of T. guoi, as these sequences were included in the molecular analysis in Chen et al. (2021). Another example is the orange-red stripe on the ventral surface of the tail used to diagnose T. caudornatus (Chen et al. 2020). This was based on the type locality only, which was the extent of the range known at the time. However, the range has since been extended to northern Myanmar (Vogel et al. 2023; this study) where specimens do not consistently show this caudal stripe (File S10B). Use of hue as a character is also limited when it comes to preserved material, which usually retains only an indication of pattern (i.e., presence or absence of ventrolateral and postocular light (usually white in live material but may be yellow) and dark (usually red in live material) stripes. We tested the utility of these pattern elements by carrying out bivariate Pearson correlations between principal components summarising colour pattern variation (COL_LAT in both sexes and COL_OC in males) with the canonical variate scores from the morphological analysis. (Significant correlations (p < 0.01) were found between COL_OC and CV1 and COL_LAT and CV2 in males, while COL–LAT in females is significantly correlated (p < 0.01) with both CV1 and CV2 in females. CV3 was not correlated with colour pattern in either sex. When the pattern components were included in a canonical variate analysis, they did not contribute substantially to discrimination on the first two axes in either sex (not shown). This suggests that colour pattern, and particularly hue, characters should be avoided in diagnoses of new species, particularly if based on restricted geographic sampling.

Hemipenis

Considerable variation in the hemipenial morphology within Trimeresurus sensu lato has been noted for some time and was the basis of its subdivision into smaller genera by Malhotra and Thorpe (2004), together with correspondence with well-supported mitochondrial clades and other derived characters such as the fusion of the first supralabial and nasal scale. Malhotra and Thorpe (2004) noted substantial errors in the literature because the thin and elongated hemipenial lobes of some species, including the species in this study, are difficult to completely evert. Other errors, such as the depiction of an apparently unique hemipenis structure in the description of Himalayophis arunachalensis (Captain et al. 2019) may be due to unsuccessful attempts to inflate the hemipenes after fixation of the specimen (M. Folwell, personal communication; also see Genesis et al. 2022). Unfortunately, these errors continue to be propagated, with Vogel et al. (2023) describing T. uetzi as having a short-lobed hemipenis. We examined other specimens referred to T. uetzi and can confirm that they have the same elongated hemipenes as the rest of Trimeresurus sensu stricto While all T. uetzi males in the CAS collections have both hemipenes partly everted, it is still possible to infer hemipenis type by examining the point at which the hemipenis retractor muscles attach to the caudal vertebrae (File S10C). We recommend that, in future, only one hemipenis is everted at preservation, leaving the other intact to be examined properly by dissection.

Fusion of the first supralabial and nasal scale

This is a synapomorphic character, which in tandem with elongated hemipenis type, is diagnostic of Trimeresurus sensu Malhotra and Thorpe (2004). However, Vogel et al. (2023) apparently contradicted this by including the “first supralabial not fused with nasal scale or barely fused with a suture visible” as a diagnostic character for T. uetzi. Our own data, based on 11 males and seven females from Mandalay, Magway, Sagaing, and Bago Divisions, Myanmar, found all specimens to have at least partial fusion, with scores ranging between 0.15–0.95 (mean 0.56, where 0 is complete separation and 1 is complete fusion). This character requires careful examination under magnification in extreme cases to distinguish creases between the fused scales from sutures (see File S10D for details of an extreme case which could be interpreted as complete separation).

Scale reduction formulae

A convention in herpetological systematics is to report dorsal scale counts at three points around the body: one head length behind the head, at midbody, and one head length anterior to the vent. In vipers, where circumference changes substantially along the length of the body, these are not reliable counts, particularly behind the head, where the number of scales changes rapidly and a slight shift in the point of counting can change the result. Similarly, while in most cases change to the midbody count occurs relatively close to the head, this can vary and, in some specimens, this decrease in the number of scale rows is not regular, but rather insertions and fusions occur several times along the body and can give rise to variation at the midbody count. Therefore, recording the scale reduction formula (Dowling 1951a), while taking more time, is a more accurate means of comparing differences in scale numbers along the body and tail. However, a common practice among museums is to tie the specimen label very tightly around the neck, distorting the skin and making it difficult or impossible to accurately count scale reductions. This may be overcome by determining the first reduction that occurs anterior to the midbody, which is usually sufficient. Another problem is that the points at which reductions occur are measured relative to the ventral scale numbers and this must be standardised as numbers of ventral scales can vary considerably. Additional error can be introduced by the method by which the first ventral scale is determined. While it has become common practice to use the method introduced by Dowling (1951b) for all snakes, this was introduced for use with colubrids, which have relatively narrow heads, with little change in circumference between the head and neck. In these cases, the distinction between gular and ventral scales can be difficult to determine. This is not the case in vipers, and using Dowling’s method often results in artificial separation between ventrals and “pre-ventrals”. While the latter may be absent or only make a minor difference to the ventral scale count, in some cases the difference can be substantial (up to 10 or 11 ventral scales being classified as pre-ventrals). Hence, we advocate the simpler criterion used here and, having examined > 1000 specimens of Asian pitvipers, we are confident that our method reliably separates gular and ventral scales.

Mensural characters

Snakes present a challenge as there are few shape characters that vary, and apart from tail length, these are mostly associated with head shape. However, these characters are not easy to include for several reasons. Many museum specimens, especially older ones, have very distorted heads. Some measurements, such as head width at its widest point, are difficult to measure accurately as it tends to occur where soft tissue is easily deformed, and substantial shrinkage occurs during preservation. Other measurements, such as head length, are more constrained by underlying bone and less subject to shrinkage. Even when accurately measured, the difference in measurements due to allometric growth must be removed before analysis. Despite the extensive literature on this topic over the last 50 years (Thorpe 1975; Lleonart et al. 2000; Chan and Grismer 2021b) making it clear that ratios (where a given measurement is simply divided by a measure of size, usually snout–vent length) are inappropriate for adjusting size differences, they are still commonly used (Vogel et al. 2023; Idiatullina et al. 2024). The recommended regression model, as used in this study, still suffers from the assumption that the within-group slopes between the dependent and independent variables are not significantly different. This can be explicitly tested but is a condition that is less likely to be met in more divergent taxa.

Conclusion

Fully untangling species boundaries and relationships in the Trimeresurus albolabris complex is likely to require a comprehensive analysis of their evolutionary history including distinguishing between ancient and modern gene flow and incomplete lineage sorting and demographic modelling (Vences et al. 2024). As sequencing costs go down and methods for extracting phylogenomic information from low-coverage genomes (Zhang et al. 2019; Xie et al. 2024), including from museum specimens emerge (Major et al. 2023), the size of genomic datasets and computational barriers become more of an issue. Many studies are consequently resorting to rapid methods such as neighbour-joining and its extensions. While their accuracy with large datasets is under debate (Nakhleh et al. 2002; Tamura et al. 2004; Nesterenko et al. 2022), methods are being developed to jointly estimate phylogenies and delimit species using large multilocus datasets (Fujisawa et al. 2016; Douglas and Bouckaert 2022), although they can still be misled by violations of assumptions, including gene flow and introgression (Chan et al. 2020; Dufresnes et al. 2020, 2023). Instead, these high-resolution datasets may be better employed to investigate these phenomena in an integrative framework. Thus, the obvious next step in the albolabris complex is to incorporate genomic analysis to test for contemporary gene flow in secondary contact zones. To this end, analysis of low-coverage whole-genome sequences is currently in progress. Until such data is available, we suggest it is appropriate to take a conservative approach, based on the current state of our knowledge of these pitvipers and the apparent extensive intergradation between them in Indochina. Therefore, with specific reference to the lack of a reproductive barrier in the meaning of the Biological Species Concept, we downgrade the taxon level of four populations currently recognized at the species level as follows: Trimeresurus septentrionalis salazar comb. nov., Trimeresurus septentrionalis caudornatus comb. nov., Trimeresurus septentrionalis uetzi comb. nov., and Trimeresurus albolabris guoi comb. nov.

Acknowledgements

This work has taken place over the last 30 years and has been assisted by a large number of people over that time. Fieldwork was facilitated by collaborations with Lawan Chanhome (Queen Savoabha Memorial Institute), Jarujin Nabhitabhata ((National Science Museum of Thailand), Kumthorn Thirakhupt (Chulalongkorn University), Cheelaprabha Rangsiyanon (Chiang Mai University) in Thailand, Sangkot Marzuki (Eijkmann Institute, Jakarta) in Indonesia, Tr?nh Xuân Ki?m (Cho–Ray Hospital) in Vietnam, Guo Peng (Yibin University) and Pipeng Li (Shenyang University) in China, Kartik Shanker (Indian Institute of Sciences, Bangalore), HT Lalremsanga (Mizoram University), Omesh Kumar Bharti (State Institute of (Health and Family Welfare, Shimla), and Vishal Santra (CONCERN, Hooghly) in India. Funding for fieldwork was provided by a Royal Society International Joint Project grant (2006/R1 with Guo Peng), the Darwin Initiative (162/6/65 to AM), the Leverhulme Trust (F174/I to RS Thorpe), Natural Environment Research Council of the United Kingdom (grant number NER/A/S/2001/01217 to AM, RST) and small grants from the Linnean Society and the Carnegie Trust. Permission to collect samples was provided by the National Science Council of Thailand (0706/11220), LIPI Indonesia (5119/II/KS/93), the Ministry of Health, Vietnam, to Tr?nh Xuân Ki?m, the National Biodiversity Authority of India (NBA/Tech Appl/9/1673/18/22-23/2054) and the State Forest Departments of Himachal Pradesh (FEE-FB-F(10)-3/2017 to Omesh K Bharti) and Mizoram (A33011/5/2011-CWLW/305 to HT Lalremsanga) in India. (Many people have assisted AM and RST in the field at various times and places, including Peter Paul van Dijk, Lawan Chanhome, Tanya Chan-Ard, Merel J. Cox, Jonathan Murray, Steve Paglia, Galen Valle, Jenny Daltry, Wolfgang Wüster, Aucky Hinting, Vincent Khartono, Pak Harwono, Vishal Santra, Vipin Dhiman, Ben Owens, Sourish Kuttalam, Stuart Graham, Anatoli Togridou, Nilanjan Mukherjee, Manas Bandhu Majumder, Molla Talhauddin Ahmed, Sankha Suvra Nandy, Anweshan Patra, and Melvin Selvan. Additional tissue samples were provided by BB Bhetwal, Samuel Li, Andreas Gumprecht, Michihisa Toriba, Peter Zürcher, James Lazell, and Indraneil Das. Genetic analysis of samples was assisted by a large number of Honours, MSc, and PhD students, including Kate Sanders, Karen Dawson, Carlotta Ercolani, Cathy Pook, Lewis Campbell, Joshua Fulford, Max Jones and Robert Aldridge, and funded by studentship support grants from Bangor University, as well as grants from the School Research Committee to AM. Wendy Grail and Nicholas Welsby provided technical assistance in the laboratory in Bangor and Priyanka Swamy, Princia D’Souza, Vidisha Kulkarni, and Somdipta Sen at the Centre for Ecological Sciences, Indian Institute of Sciences, India. We are grateful to the curatorial staff of the Natural History Museums and private individuals named in this paper for the opportunity to examine preserved specimens in their care and for the loan of tissue samples. We are thankful to Patrick David for the information on Bothrops fario, without which we would have been in danger of creating a junior synonym, and to Hinrich Kaiser for the information on the likely origin of the nomen fario. Wolfgang Wüster, Hinrich Kaiser, Christophe Dufresnes, and one anonymous reviewer provided detailed and helpful comments on earlier versions of this manuscript, which have greatly improved it.

References

  • Ahrens D, Ahyong ST, Ballerio A, Barclay MVL, Eberle J, Espeland M, Huber BA, Mengual X, Pacheco TL, Peters RS, Rulik B, Vaz-De-Mello F, Wesener T, Krell F-T (2021) Is it time to describe new species without diagnoses? A comment on Sharkey et al. Zootaxa 5027: 151–159. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5027.2.1
  • Adiwinata R, Nelwan EJ (2015) Snakebite in Indonesia. Acta Medica Indonesiana 47: 358–365.
  • Arteaga A, Pyron RA, Batista A, Vieira J, Meneses-Pelayo E, Smith EN, Barrio-Amorós CL, Koch C, Agne S, Valencia JH, Bustamante L, Harris KJ (2024) Systematic revision of the eyelash palm-pitviper Bothriechis schlegelii (Serpentes, Viperidae), with the description of five new species and revalidation of three. Evolutionary Systematics 8: 15–64. https://doi.org/10.3897/evolsyst.8.114527
  • Barnes CH, Strine CT, Suwanwaree P, Hill J III (2017) Movement and home range of green pit vipers (Trimeresurus spp.) in a rural landscape in northeast Thailand. Herpetological Bulletin 142: 19–28.
  • Biakzuala L, Muansanga L, Malsawmdawngliana F, Hmar L, Lalremsanga HT (2024) New country record of Trimeresurus uetzi Vogel, Nguyen and David, 2023 (Reptilia: Squamata: Viperidae) from India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 16: 25268–25272. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.8910.16.5.25268-25272
  • Bouchet P, Decock W, Lonneville B, Vanhoorne B, Vandepitte L (2023) Marine biodiversity discovery: The metrics of new species de­scriptions. Frontiers in Marine Science 10: 929989. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2023.929989
  • Bouckaert R, Vaughan TG, Barido-Sottani J, Duchêne S, Fourment M, Gavryushkina A, Heled J, Jones G, Kühnert D, De Maio N, Matschiner M, Mendes FK, Müller NF, Ogilvie HA, du Plessis L, Popinga A, Rambaut A, Rasmussen D, Siveroni I, Suchard MA, Wu CH, Xie D, Zhang C, Stadler T, Drummond AJ (2019) BEAST 2.5: An advanced software platform for Bayesian evolutionary analysis. PLoS Computational Biology 15: e1006650. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006650
  • Brown MB, Forsythe AB (1974) Robust test for the equality of variances. Journal of the American Statistical Association 69: 364–367.
  • Burbrink FT, Gehara M, McKelvy AD, Myers EA (2021) Resolving spatial complexities of hybridization in the context of the gray zone of speciation in North American ratsnakes (Pantherophis obsoletus complex). Evolution 75: 260–277. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syad019
  • Captain A, Deepak V, Pandit R, Bhatt B, Athreya R (2019) A new species of pitviper (Serpentes: Viperidae: Trimeresurus Lacepède, 1804) from West Kameng District, Arunachal Pradesh, India. Russian Journal of Herpetology 26: 111–122. https://doi.org/10.30906/1026-2296-2019-26-2-111-122
  • Chambers EA, Marshall TL, Hillis DM (2023) The importance of contact zones for distinguishing interspecific from intraspecific geographic variation. Systematic Biology 72: 357–371. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syac056.
  • Chan KO, Anuar S, Sankar A, Law IT, Law IS, Shivaram R, Christian C, Mulcahy DG, Malhotra A (2023b) A new species of pit-viper from the Ayeyarwady and Yangon regions in Myanmar (Viperidae, Trimeresurus). ZooKeys 1186: 221–234. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1186.110422
  • Chan KO, Grismer LL (2021a) A standardized and statistically defensible framework for quantitative morphological analyses in taxonomic studies. Zootaxa 5023: 293–300. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5023.2.9
  • Chan KO, Hutter CR, Wood PL Jr, Grismer LL, Das I, Brown RM (2020) Gene flow creates a mirage of cryptic species in a Southeast Asian spotted stream frog complex. Molecular Ecology 29: 3970–3987. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.15603
  • Chan KO, Mulcahy DG, Anuar S (2023a) The artefactual branch effect and phylogenetic conflict: Species delimitation with gene flow in mangrove pit vipers (Trimeresurus purpureomaculatuserythrurus complex). Systematic Biology 72: 1209–1219. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syad043
  • Chandramouli SR, Campbell PD, Vogel G (2020) A new species of green pit viper of the genus Trimeresurus Lacépède, 1804 (Reptilia: Serpentes: Viperidae) from the Nicobar Archipelago, Indian Ocean. Amphibian and Reptile Conservation 14: 169–176.
  • Chen Z, Shi S, Gao J, Vogel G, Song Z, Ding L, Dai R (2021) A new species of Trimeresurus Lacépède, 1804. (Squamata: Viperidae) from southwestern China, Vietnam, Thailand and Myanmar. Asian Herpetological Research 12: 167–177. https://doi.org/10.16373/j.cnki.ahr.200084
  • Chen Z, Yu J, Vogel G, Shi S, Song Z, Tang Y, Yang J, Ding LI, Chen C (2020) A new pit viper of the genus Trimeresurus (Lacépède, 1804) (Squamata: Viperidae) from southwest China. Zootaxa 4768: 112–128. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4768.1.7
  • Coyne JA, Orr HA (2004) Speciation. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, xiii, 545 pp.
  • David P, Vidal N, Pauwels OSG (2001) A morphological study of Stejneger’s pitviper Trimeresurus stejnegeri (Serpentes, Viperidae, Crotalinae), with the description of a new species from Thailand. Russian Journal of Herpetology 8: 205–222. https://doi.org/10.30906/1026-2296-2001-8-3-205-222
  • David P, Vogel G, Dubois A (2011) On the need to follow rigorously the rules of the Code for the subsequent designation of a nucleospecies (type species) for a nominal genus which lacked one: The case of the nominal genus Trimeresurus Lacépède, 1804 (Reptilia: Squamata: Viperidae). Zootaxa 2992: 1–51. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.2992.1.1
  • Dellicour S, Flot J-F (2015) Delimiting species-poor data sets using single molecular markers: A study of barcode gaps, haplowebs and GMYC. Systematic Biology 64: 900–908, https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syu130
  • DeRaad DA, McCormack JE, Chen N, Peterson AT, Moyle RG (2022) Combining species delimitation, species trees, and tests for gene flow clarifies complex speciation in scrub-jays. Systematic Biology 71: 1453–1470. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syac034
  • Dowling HG (1951b) A proposed standard system of counting ventrals in snakes. British Journal of Herpetology 1: 97–99.
  • Dufresnes C, Mazepa G, Jablonski D, Oliveira RC, Wenseleers T, Shabanov DA, Auer M, Ernst R, Koch C, Ramírez-Chaves HE, Mulder KP, Simonov E, Tiutenko A, Kryvokhyzha D, Wennekes PL, Zinenko OI, Korshunov OV, Al-Johany AM, Peregontsev EA, Masroor R, Betto-Colliard C, Denoël M, Borkin LJ, Skorinov DV, Pasynkova RA, Mazanaeva LF, Rosanov JM, Dubey S, Litvinchuk S (2019) Fifteen shades of green: The evolution of Bufotes toads revisited. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 141: 106615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2019.106615
  • Dufresnes C, Poyarkov N, Jablonski D (2023) Acknowledging more biodiversity without more species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 120: e2302424120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2302424120
  • Dufresnes C, Pribille M, Alard B, Gonçalves H, Amat F, Crochet P-A, Dubey S, Perrin N, Fumagalli L, Vences M, Martínez-Solano I (2020) Integrating hybrid zone analyses in species delimitation: Lessons from two anuran radiations of the western Mediterranean. Heredity 124: 423–438. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41437-020-0294-z
  • Duran DP, Laroche RA, Roman SJ, Godwin W, Herrmann DP, Bull E, Scott PE (2024) Species delimitation, discovery and conservation in a tiger beetle species complex despite discordant genetic data. Scientific Reports 14: 6617. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-56875-9
  • Eriksson S, Nguyen TT (2017) Snakebites in Southern Vietnam: Admitted Patients and Snake Species Involved. Geose Information, Norrahammar, 23 pp. https://geose.se [accessed 8 February 2025].
  • Ferrer Obiol J, Herranz JM, Paris JR, Whiting J, Rozas J, Riutort M, González-Solís J (2023) Species delimitation using genomic data to resolve taxonomic uncertainties in a speciation continuum of pelagic seabirds. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 179: 107671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2022.107671
  • Flanagan T, Shea GM, Roll U, Tingley R, Meiri S, Chapple DG (2024) New data and taxonomic changes influence our understanding of biogeographic patterns: A case study in Australian skinks. Journal of Zoology 323: 317–330. https://doi.org/10.1111/jzo.13173
  • Flot J-F, Couloux A, Tillier S (2010) Haplowebs as a graphical tool for delimiting species: A revival of Doyle’s “field for recombination” approach and its application to the coral genus Pocillopora in Clipperton. BMC Evolutionary Biology 10: 372. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-10-372
  • Fujisawa T, Aswad A, Barraclough TG (2016) A rapid and scalable method for multilocus species delimitation using Bayesian model comparison and rooted triplets. Systematic Biology 65: 759–771. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syw028
  • Funk ER, Mason NA, Pálsson S, Albrecht T, Johnson JA, Taylor SA (2021) A supergene underlies linked variation in color and morphology in a Holarctic songbird. Nature Communications 12: 6833. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-27173-z
  • Genesis LG, Greenwood J, Secor S, Shan S, Hedrick BP, Brennan PLR (2022) Examining the shape and size of female and male genitalia in snakes using three-dimensional geometric morphometrics. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 136: 466–476. https://doi.org/10.1093/biolinnean/blac051
  • Gerard JD, Boruah B, Deepak V, Das A (2024) First record of two species of venomous snakes Bungarus suzhenae and Ovophis zayuensis (Serpentes: Elapidae, Viperidae) from India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 16: 25385–25399. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.8935.16.6.25385-25399
  • Hillis DM (2022) Species, clades, and their relationship to paraphyly and monophyly: Examples from the Pantherophis obsoletus complex. Herpetological Review 53: 47–53.
  • Hillis DM, Chambers EA, Devitt TJ (2021) Contemporary methods and evidence for species delimitation. Ichthyology and Herpetology 109: 895–903. https://doi.org/10.1643/h2021082
  • ICZN [International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature] (1999) International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. Fourth Edition. International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature, London, XXIX, 306 pp.
  • Jan G (1859a) Plan d’une iconographie descriptive des ophidiens et description sommaire de nouvelles espèces de serpents. Revue et Magasin de Zoologie pure et appliquée, 2e Série 11: 148–157.
  • Jan G (1859b) Prodrome d’une iconographie descriptive des ophidiens et description sommaire de nouvelles espèces de serpents venimeux. Imprimerie de Mme Ve. Bouchard-Huzard, Paris, 32 pp., 12 plates.
  • Jan G (1863) Elenco Sistematico degli Ofidi descritti e disegnati per l’Iconografia Generale. A. Lombardi, Milan, 143 pp.
  • Kaiser H, Crother BI, Kelly CMR, Luiselli L, O’Shea M, Ota H, Passos P, Schleip WD, Wüster W (2013) Best practices: In the 21st century, taxonomic decisions in herpetology are acceptable only when supported by a body of evidence and published via peer-review. Herpetological Review 44: 8–23.
  • Kalyaanamoorthy S, Minh BQ, Wong TKF, von Haeseler A, Jermiin LS (2017) ModelFinder: Fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nature Methods 14: 587–589. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4285
  • Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K (2016) MEGA7: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Molecular Bio­logy and Evolution 33: 1870–1874. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msw054
  • Kurniawan N, Fathoni M, Fatchiyah, Aulani A, Septiadi L, Smith EN (2021) Composition, distribution, and habitat type of snakes in Java, with discussion on the impact of human-snake interactions during 2013–2019. Herpetology Notes 14: 691–711.
  • Levene H (1960) Robust testes for equality of variances. In: Olkin I (Ed.) Contributions to Probability and Statistics. Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, CA, 278–292.
  • Lewis CT, Short C (2020) A Latin Dictionary. Nigel Gourlay, Chapel-en-le-Frith, 1192 pp.
  • Linnaeus C (1746) Fauna Svecica Sistens Animalia Sveciæ Regni: Quadrupedia, Aves, Amphibia, Pisces, Insecta, Vermes, Distributa per Classes & Ordines, Genera & Species. Cum differentiis specierum, synonymis Autorum, Nominibus Incolarum, Locis Habitationum, Descriptionibus Insectorum. Conrad Wishoff and Georg Jacob Wishoff, Leiden, 411 pp.
  • Linnaeus C (1758) Systema Naturæ per Regna Tria Naturæ, Secundum Classes, Ordines, Genera, Species, cum Characteribus, Differentiis, Synonymis, Locis. Editio Decima, Reformata. Lars Salvius, Stockholm, 823 pp.
  • Lleonart J, Salat J, Torres GJ (2000) Removing allometric effects of body size in morphological analysis. Journal of Theoretical Biology 205: 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.2000.2043
  • Major T, Renk P, Reissig J, Paijmans JLA, Morris E, Hofreiter M, Barlow A, Broadley DG, Wüster W (2023) Museum DNA reveals a new, potentially extinct species of rinkhals (Serpentes: Elapidae: Hemachatus) from the Eastern Highlands of Zimbabwe. PLoS ONE 18: e0291432. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0291432
  • Malhotra A, Creer S, Pook CE, Thorpe RS (2010) Inclusion of nuclear intron sequence data helps to identify the Asian sister group of New World pitvipers. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 54: 172–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2009.09.007
  • Mallik AK, Srikanthan AN, Ganesh SR, Vijayakumar SP, Campbell PD, Malhotra A, Shanker K (2021) Resolving pitfalls in pit viper systematics – A multi-criteria approach to species delimitation in pit vipers (Reptilia, Viperidae, Craspedocephalus) of Peninsular India reveals cryptic diversity. Vertebrate Zoology 71: 577–619. https://doi.org/10.3897/vz.71.e66239
  • Maritz B, Penner J, Martins M, Crnobrnja-Isailovic J, Spear S, Alencar LRV, Sigala-Rodriguez J, Messenger K, Clark RW, Soorae P, Luiselli L, Jenkins C, Greene HW (2016) Identifying global priorities for the conservation of vipers. Biological Conservation 204: 94–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.05.004
  • Martinsson S, Klinth M, Erséus C (2020) Testing species hypotheses for Fridericia magna, an enchytraeid worm (Annelida: Clitellata) with great mitochondrial variation. BMC Evolutionary Biology 20: 116. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-020-01678-5
  • McGuire JA, Huang X, Reilly SB, Iskandar DT, Wang-Claypool CY, Werning S, Chong RA, Lawalata SZS, Stubbs AL, Frederick JH, Brown RM, Evans BJ, Arifin U, Riyanto A, Hamidy A, Arida E, Koo MS, Supriatna J, Andayani N, Hall R (2023) Species delimitation, phylogenomics, and biogeography of Sulawesi flying lizards: A diversification history complicated by ancient hybridization, cryptic species, and arrested speciation. Systematic Biology 72: 885–911. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syad020
  • Meier R, Blaimer BB, Buenaventura E, Hartop E, von Rintelen T, Srivathsan A, Yeo D (2022) A re-analysis of the data in Sharkey et al.’s (2021) minimalist revision reveals that BINs do not deserve names, but BOLD Systems needs a stronger commitment to open science. Cladistics 38: 264–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/cla.12489
  • Meierotto S, Sharkey MJ, Janzen DH, Hallwachs W, Hebert PDN, Chapman EG, Smith MA (2019) A revolutionary protocol to describe understudied hyperdiverse taxa and overcome the taxonomic impediment. Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift 66: 119–145. https://doi.org/10.3897/dez.66.34683
  • Miller MA, Pfeiffer W, Schwartz T (2010) Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. In: Proceedings of the Gateway Computing Environments Workshop. New Orleans, LA, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/GCE.2010.5676129
  • Nabhan AR, Sarkar IN (2012) The impact of taxon sampling on phylogenetic inference: A review of two decades of controversy. Briefings in Bioinformatics 13: 122–134. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbr014
  • Nguyen L-T, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ (2015) IQ-TREE: A fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum likelihood phylogenies. Molecular Biology and Evolution 32: 268–274. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msu300
  • Nguyen T, Idiiatullina S, Oo W, Lee J, Poyarkov N, David P, Vogel G (2024) A redescription and range extension of Trimeresurus caudornatus Chen, Ding, Vogel & Shi, 2020 (Serpentes: Viperidae). Zoo­taxa 5514: 201–231. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5514.3.1
  • Padial JM, De la Riva I (2020) A paradigm shift in our view of species drives current trends in biological classification. Biological Reviews 96: 731–751. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12676
  • Patikorn C, Ismail AK, Abidin SAZ, Blanco FB, Blessmann J, Choumlivong K, Comandante JD, Doan UV, Mohamed Ismail Z, Khine YY, Maharani T, Nwe MT, Qamruddin RM, Safferi RS, Santamaria E, Tiglao PJG, Trakulsrichai S, Vasaruchapong T, Chaiyakunapruk N, Taychakhoonavudh S, Othman I (2022) Situation of snakebite, antivenom market and access to antivenoms in ASEAN countries. BMJ Global Health 7: e007639. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007639
  • Pope CH, Pope SH (1933) A study of the green pitvipers of Southeastern Asia and Malaysia, commonly identified as Trimeresurus gramineus (Shaw), with description of a new species from Peninsular India. American Museum Novitates 620: 1–12.
  • Priambodo B, Liu F-GR, Kurniawan N (2019) Transoceanic disperse of the white-lipped island pit viper (Cryptelytrops insularis; Kramer,1997) from Sundaland to Lesser Sunda, Indonesia. Journal of Experimental Life Sciences 9: 7–15. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jels.2019.009.01.02
  • Pyšek P, Hulme PE, Meyerson LA, Smith GF, Boatwright JS, Crouch NR, Figueiredo E, Foxcroft LC, Jarošík V, Richardson DM, Suda J, Wilson JRU (2013) Hitting the right target: Taxonomic challenges for, and of, plant invasions. AoB Plants 19: plt042. https://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plt042
  • Rambaut A, Drummond AJ, Xie D, Baele G, Suchard MA (2018) Posterior summarisation in Bayesian phylogenetics using Tracer 1.7. Systematic Biology 67: 901–904. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syy032
  • Reilly SB, Stubbs AL, Karin BR, Arida E, Iskandar DT, McGuire JA (2019) Recent colonization and expansion through the Lesser Sundas by seven amphibian and reptile species. Zoologica Scripta 48: 614–626. https://doi.org/10.1111/zsc.12368
  • Renoult JP, Geniez P, Bacquet P, Benoit L, Crochet P-A (2009) Morphology and nuclear markers reveal extensive mitochondrial introgressions in the Iberian wall lizard species complex. Molecular Ecology 18: 4298–4315. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04351.x
  • Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Höhna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP (2012) MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology 61: 539–542. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/sys029
  • Rozas J, Ferrer-Mata A, Sánchez-DelBarrio JC, Guirao-Rico S, Librado P, Ramos-Onsins SE, Sánchez-Gracia A (2017) DnaSP 6: DNA sequence polymorphism analysis of large data sets. Molecular Biology and Evolution 34: 3299–3302. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msx248
  • Sabaj MH (2023) Codes for Natural History Collections in Ichthyology and Herpetology (online supplement). Version 9.5 (10 Nov 2023). American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists, Washington, DC. https://asih.org [accessed 7 January 2025]
  • Salinas-de-León P, Martí-Puig P, Buglass S, Arnés-Urgellés C, Rastoin-Laplane E, Creemers M, Cairns S, Fisher C, O’Hara T, Ott B, Raineault NA, Reiswig H, Rouse G, Rowley S, Shank TM, Suarez J, Watling L, Wicksten MK, Marsh L (2020) Characterization of deep-sea benthic invertebrate megafauna of the Galapagos Islands. Scientific Reports 10: 13894. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70744-1
  • Sánchez KI, Diaz Huesa DG, Breitman MF, Avila LJ, Sites JW, Morando M (2023) Complex patterns of diversification in the gray zone of speciation: Model-based approaches applied to Patagonian liolaemid Lizards (Squamata: Liolaemus kingii clade), Systematic Biology 72: 739–752. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syad019
  • Savage JM, McDiarmid RW (2017) The Herpetological Contributions of Giorgio Jan (1791–1866), with an Introduction, Annotated Bibliography, Synopsis of Herpetological Taxa, and a Comprehensive Guide to the Iconographie generale des Ophidiens. Facsimile Reprints in Herpetology, Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles, Villanova, PA, 926 pp.
  • von Schönefeld S (1624) Ichthyologia et Nomenclaturæ Animalium Marinorum, Fluviatilium, Lacustrium, quæ in Florentissimis Ducatibus Slesvici et Holsatiæ & Celeberrimo Emporio Hamburgo Occurrunt Triviales. Bibliopolio Heringiano, Hamburg, 87 pp., 7 plates.
  • Scali S (2010) Storia e importanza scientifica della collezione erpetologica del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Milano. In: Mazzotti A (Ed.) Le Collezioni Erpetologiche dei Musei Italiani: Censimento e Analisi delle Collezioni di Anfibi e Rettili per la Loro Valorizzazione Scientifica. Museologia Scientifica Memorie 5: 69–77.
  • Sharkey MJ, Janzen DH, Hallwachs W, Chapman EG, Smith MA, Dapkey T, Brown A, Ratnasingham S, Naik S, Manjunath R, Perez K, Milton M, Hebert P, Shaw SR, Kittel RN, Alma Solis M, Metz MA, Goldstein PZ, Brown JW, Quicke DLJ, van Achterberg C, Brown BV, Burns JM (2021) Minimalist revision and description of 403 new species in 11 subfamilies of Costa Rican braconid parasitoid wasps, including host records for 219 species. ZooKeys 1013: 1–665. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1013.55600
  • Simkins AT, Buchanan GM, Davies RG, Donald PF (2020) The implications for conservation of a major taxonomic revision of the world’s birds. Animal Conservation 23: 345–352. https://doi.org/10.1111/acv.12545
  • Spöri Y, Flot J-F (2020) HaplowebMaker and CoMa: Two web tools to delimit species using haplowebs and conspecificity matrices. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 11: 1434–1438. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13454
  • Tamura K, Nei M, Kumar S (2004) Prospects for inferring very large phylogenies by using the neighbor-joining method. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101: 11030–11035. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0404206101
  • Tan CH, Liew JL, Tan NH, Khaldun IA, Maharani T, Khomvilai S, Sitprija V (2017) Cross reactivity and lethality neutralization of venoms of Indonesian Trimeresurus complex species by Thai green pit viper antivenom. Toxicon 140: 32–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxicon.2017.10.014
  • Thang VV, Bao TQQ, Tuyen HD, Krumkamp R, Hai LH, Dang NH, Chu CM, Blessmann J (2020) Incidence of snakebites in Can Tho Municipality, Mekong Delta, South Vietnam – Evaluation of the responsible snake species and treatment of snakebite envenoming. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 14: e0008430. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0008430
  • Thi Hanh N, Quang Truong N, Minh Hanh NV, Quang Vinh L, Phimphasone V, Van Nghia H, Ziegler T, Le MD (2022) Molecular assessment of pitviper populations (genus Trimeresurus) in Laos and Vietnam reveals new country record and overlooked diversity. Vietnam Journal of Biotechnology 20: 589–598. https://doi.org/10.15625/1811-4989/16863
  • Thiele KR, Conix S, Pyle RL, Barik SK, Christidis L, Costello MJ, van Dijk PP, Kirk P, Lien A, Thomson SA, Zachos FE, Zhang Z-Q, Garnett ST (2021) Towards a global list of accepted species I. Why taxonomists sometimes disagree, and why this matters. Organisms Diversity and Evolution 21: 615–622. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13127-021-00495-y
  • Thorpe RS (1975) Quantitative handling of characters useful in snake systematics with particular reference to intraspecific variation in the ringed snake Natrix natrix (L.). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 7: 27–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.1975.tb00732.x
  • Thorpe RS, Surget-Groba Y, Johansson H (2008) The relative importance of ecology and geographic isolation for speciation in anoles. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 363: 3071–3081. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0077
  • Trifinopoulos J, Nguyen L-T, von Haeseler A, Quang Minh B (2016) W-IQ-TREE: A fast online phylogenetic tool for maximum likelihood analysis. Nucleic Acids Research 44: W232–W235. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw256
  • Vences M, Miralles A, Dufresnes C (2024) Next-generation species delimitation and taxonomy: Implications for biogeography. Journal of Biogeography 51: 1709–1722. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.14807
  • Vogel G, David P, Chandramouli SR (2014) On the systematics of Trimeresurus labialis Fitzinger in Steindachner, 1867, a pitviper from the Nicobar Islands (India), with revalidation of Trimeresurus mutabilis Stoliczka, 1870 (Squamata, Viperidae, Crotalinae). Zootaxa 3786: 557–573. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3786.5.4
  • Vogel G, Nguyen TV, David P (2023) A new green pitviper of the Trimeresurus albolabris complex (Reptilia, Serpentes, Viperidae) from central and southern Myanmar. Zootaxa 5357: 515–554. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5357.4.3
  • Warrell DA (2008) Unscrupulous marketing of snake bite antivenoms in Africa and Papua New Guinea: Choosing the right product – ‘What’s in a name?’ Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 102: 397–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trstmh.2007.12.005
  • Williams DJ, Jensen SD, O’Shea M (2009) Snakebite Management in Cambodia: Towards improved prevention, clinical treatment and rehabilitation. WHO Regional Office for the Western Pacific, Manila, 70 pp.
  • Wüster W, Kaiser H, Hoogmoed MS, Ceríaco LMP, Dufresnes C, Glaw F, Hille A, Dirksen L, Köhler J, Koppetsch T, Milto KD, Shea GM, Tarkhnishvili D, Thomson SA, Vences M, Böhme W (2024) How not to describe a species: Lessons from a tangle of anacondas (Boidae: Eunectes Wagler, 1830). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 201: zlae099. https://doi.org/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlae099
  • Xie J, Zhang Z (2006) Genetic diversity decreases as population density declines: Implications of temporal variation in mitochondrial haplotype frequencies in a natural population of Tscherskia triton. Integrative Zoology 1: 188–193. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-4877.2006.00035.x
  • Xie P, Guo Y, Teng Y, Zhou W, Yu Y (2024) GeneMiner: A tool for extracting phylogenetic markers from next-generation sequencing data. Molecular Ecology Resources 24: e13924. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13924
  • Yanega D, Pape T, Welter-Schultes F, Kojima J-I, Evenhuis N, Krell F-T, Grygier M, Ahyong S, Ballerio A, Bouchard P, Rheindt F, Dmitriev D, Harvey M, Lamas G, Pyle R, Halliday R, Zhang Z-Q (2018) When zoological type specimens are lost: ICZN-compliant guidelines for when and when not to designate neotypes. ResearchGate Preprint version 12-ix-2018. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.17568.51201 [accessed 10 October 2025]
  • Yong MY, Tan KY, Tan CH (2021) Potential para-specific and geographical utility of Thai Green Pit Viper (Trimeresurus albolabris) monovalent antivenom: Neutralization of procoagulant and hemorrhagic activities of diverse Trimeresurus pit viper venoms. Toxicon 203: 85–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxicon.2021.09.021
  • Zhang F, Ding Y, Zhu C-D, Zhou X, Orr MC, Scheu S, Luan Y-X (2019) Phylogenomics from low-coverage whole-genome sequencing. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 10: 507–517. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13145
  • Zhu F, Liu Q, Che J, Zhang L, Chen X, Yan F (2016) Molecular phylogeography of white-lipped tree viper (Trimeresurus; Viperidae). Zoologica Scripta 45: 252–262. https://doi.org/10.1111/zsc.12156

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 

Files S1–S10

Malhotra A, Walter M, Limia Russel G, Thorpe RS (2025)

Data type: .zip

Explanation notes: File S1. Chronological summary of taxonomic changes in the Trimeresurus albolabris complex since the initial definition in Pope and Pope (1933). Trimeresurus macrops and its relatives are not included as they are not the focus of this study. — File S2. PCR reaction information (reagents, cycling conditions and primer information). — File S3. Details of specimens used for genetic analysis, including GenBank accession numbers. ISO codes for countries and major subdivision (states, provinces, divisions etc.) were obtained from www.statoids.com. — File S4. Full list and description of morphological characters. — File S5. Additional mitochondrial phylogenetic tree details. A Summary of clades identified in Bayesian (BI) and Maximum Likelihood (ML) analyses, with tip clades that are strongly supported in both analyses collapsed. Branches are colour coded to indicate support level: black: PP > 0.8, aSH-LRT branch test > 80% (before slash) and Ultrafast Bootstrap > 95% (after slash); orange: supported by only one method; red: no support in either method. Sequence labels follow the format genus_species_countrycode_subdivision code_specimennumber. ISO codes for countries and major subdivision (states, provinces, divisions etc.) were obtained from www.statoids.com B Full BI C Full ML mitochondrial phylogeny. Red branches indicate lack of support as defined above D Summary of clades identified in BI and ML analyses on Trimeresurus albolabris sensu stricto and related clades only, with strongly supported clades collapsed. Collapsed clades are colour coded to correspond with Figure 3C. — File S6. List of NT3 haplotypes and identical sequences (output from DnaSP v6.12.03) — File S7. Raw measurements and scale counts for all specimens analysed. — File S8. Canonical variate analysis of groups including all specimens in the purpureomaculatus group (A. Males, B. females) including Andaman and Nicobar Island species. — File S9. Canonical variate scores from the analysis of morphological variation among females in the septentrionalis and albolabris groups, plotted against longitude. — File S10. Illustration of variation in diagnostic characters published for some species in the Trimeresurus complex. A Iris colour in T. albolabris guoi from Loei (A165/AFS99.2, on left) and Pha Yao (A229/AFS97B.1, on right) provinces, Thailand. Photographs by A. Malhotra. Both these specimens were referred to this taxon by Chen et al. (2021) on the basis of mitochondrial DNA but lack the diagnostic fire-brick iris colour. B Ventral surface of the tail in specimens referred to T. septentrionalis caudornatus. Left: CAS 232435 (female, collected 2003), showing orange-red stripe still visible in preserved state; right: CAS 248141 (male, collected 2009) showing lack of visible diagnostic orange-red stripe C Hemipenis of T. septentrionalis uetzi (CAS 215604, Sagaing Div., Myanmar), showing the partially everted hemipenes which were misinterpreted by Vogel et al. (2023) as being short, reaching only the 6th–8th subcaudal, which would be markedly different to any other Trimeresurus sensu stricto species. However, dissection of the hemipenis retractor muscle shows that they extend to the 57th subcaudal in this (and other specimens). Dissection is in fact not necessary to determine this as the change in thickness of the tail at the point of insertion is quite obvious externally (yellow arrow). Species with short hemipenes (e.g., Viridovipera species) have insertion of the retractor muscles much closer to the vent (unpublished data) D Fusion of labial and nasal scale in T. septentrionalis uetzi. CAS 246991 has aberrant scalation is many respects, including multiple splits and fusions of scale rows between 23 and 19 scales around the body, and an almost complete separation of the first supralabial and nasal scale on the right side. At distance this can look complete, but close examination reveals that a short portion below the nostril is fused (middle photo, circled in yellow). The left side may also look like complete separation but the suture visible at this position is at an unusual angle (compare with right side) and could be alternatively interpreted as the aberrant separation of the scales anterior to and posterior to the nostril, which are normally completely fused in all Trimeresurus and related genera, while the fusion of the supralabial and nasal scale seems complete anterior to the nostril.

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Download file (20.84 MB)
login to comment