Research Article
Print
Research Article
Integrative taxonomy reveals a new unstriped Ichthyophis Fitzinger, 1826 from Vietnam and provides new data on diagnostic osteological traits for Asian tailed caecilians (Gymnophiona: Ichthyophiidae)
expand article infoNikolay A. Poyarkov§, Dana D. Skorinova|, Andrey M. Bragin§, Veniamin V. Kolchanov|, Vladislav A. Gorin, Alexey V. Trofimets, Alexander P. Yuzefovich, Dac Xuan Le§, Tan Van Nguyen, Pavel P. Skutschas|
‡ Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia
§ Joint Vietnam – Russia Tropical Science and Technology Research Center, Hanoi, Vietnam
| Saint Petersburg State University, Saint-Petersburg, Russia
¶ Duy Tan University, Da Nang, Vietnam
Open Access

Abstract

Herein we examined the cranial osteology of 15 species of Ichthyophis (I. asplenius, I. beddomei, I. glutinosus, I. kohtaoensis, I. larutensis, I. mindanaoensis, I. multicolor, I. nguyenorum, I. nigroflavus, I. sikkimensis, I. singaporensis, I. supachaii, I. tricolor, I. weberi, and Ichthyophis sp. from northern Vietnam) with a special emphasis on the temporal region. We presented the first detailed description of the cranium and the atlas of an Ichthyophis species based on micro-CT scanning data. We discuss the implications of temporal region composition for the systematics of this group and the evolution of the cranium in Gymnophiona as a whole. We further provided comments on a jaw-closing mechanism and reported on the presence of phylogenetically basal cranial features in ichthyophiids that are also found in stem caecilians. Our detailed morphological description was based on a specimen from a previously unknown population of unstriped Ichthyophis from northern Vietnam. We consequently described this population as a new species based on morphological and molecular (3967 bp from cyt b, 12S rRNA, and 16S rRNA mitochondrial DNA genes) lines of evidence. We provide comparisons of external morphological traits of the new species with its congeners and further compare its cranial osteological features with other Ichthyophis for which skull descriptions exist. The new species differs from the morphologically similar species I. yangi and I. chaloensis by a significant divergence in cyt b and 16S rRNA mitochondrial DNA gene sequences (p = 6.5%–6.9% and p = 4.5%, respectively). The new species is currently known only from evergreen forests of Xuan Lien National Park (Thanh Hoa Province) and Pu Hoat (Nghe An Province) Nature Reserve, northern Vietnam, and was recorded at elevations of 700–800 m asl. We suggest the new species be considered Data Deficient (DD), following the IUCN’s Red List categories.

Keywords

Ichthyophis griseivermis sp. nov., micro-CT scanning, molecular analyses, morphology, Nghe An, osteology, Pu Hoat, taxonomy, Thanh Hoa, Xuan Lien

Introduction

Caecilians (Gymnophiona) have a worm-like body plan lacking limbs and limb girdles; most species (at least as adults) are adapted to burrowing underground, though some members of this group have aquatic or semi-aquatic lifestyles or occasionally can be observed actively moving on the surface (e.g., Taylor 1968; Wilkinson 2012). Sharply different from all other extant amphibians, adult caecilians are characterized by a heavily ossified cranium and lower jaw, with homologies of some of its elements with those of other amphibian orders uncertain (e.g., Wake 2003; Carroll 2007; Vitt and Caldwell 2014; Palakkool et al. 2022). Osteological and especially cranial characters have been used in phylogenetic studies of the Gynmophiona (e.g., Nussbaum 1979; Wilkinson and Nussbaum 1999; Maddin et al. 2012; Wilkinson et al. 2011, 2014), though detailed descriptions of skull morphology are available only for a few taxa. Traditional studies of caecilian skull morphology were mostly based on descriptions of skeletons obtained by destructive methods such as maceration and drying, clearing and staining, and histology, which do not allow the subsequent examination of the external morphology of the specimen (e.g., Ramaswami 1941, 1942; Taylor 1969a; Wake 1980; Schmidt and Wake 1990; Müller et al. 2005). The recent development of a non-destructive, high-resolution X-ray microcomputed tomography (micro-CT) has facilitated exploration of caecilian osteology, in particular obtaining detailed information on the skeletal anatomy of museum specimens, including some precious name-bearing types (e.g., Wilkinson et al. 2011, 2014; Maddin et al. 2012; Sherratt et al. 2014). These studies are nevertheless limited by a relatively small number of caecilian specimens available in herpetological collections around the world. Therefore, the intra- and interspecific variation in shape, fenestration, and composition of skull elements in caecilians remains insufficiently understood (Taylor 1969a; Nussbaum 1977; Wake 2003; Carroll 2007; Sherratt et al. 2014; Wilkinson et al. 2014; Bardua et al. 2019; Palakkool et al. 2022).

The Asian tailed caecilians of the family Ichthyophiidae Taylor, 1968, comprise terrestrial limbless amphibians with aquatic larvae that are widely distributed across South and Southeast Asia from Sri Lanka and India through southern China, mainland Indochina, and Southeast Asian islands west of Wallace’s Line (Nishikawa et al. 2012a; Geissler et al. 2015; Frost 2025). The highly incomplete knowledge of ichthyophiid taxonomy, distribution, and phylogeny in Southeast Asia is explained by their secretive fossorial life history, resulting in mostly small sample sizes available in herpetological collections around the world (Geissler et al. 2015; Rao et al. 2024), as well as by relatively low interspecific morphological variability in traditional taxonomic characters (Gower et al. 2002; Nishikawa et al. 2012b, 2021). Furthermore, in the Ichthyophiidae, as in almost all other caecilian families, the barely known intraspecific variability of external traits, due to the often insufficient sample sizes, further complicates taxonomic decisions; only a few studies were able to examine a sufficient number of Ichthyophiidae specimens (e.g., Nussbaum and Gans 1980; Kupfer 2005). Several recent studies on the taxonomy and molecular phylogeny of ichthyophiids have demonstrated that the diversity of the family is substantially underestimated (Nishikawa et al. 2012a), with several new species described in recent years (e.g., Wilkinson et al. 2014; Geissler et al. 2015; Lalremsanga et al. 2021a; Rao et al. 2024).

Ichthyophiids represent an ancient lineage of extant caecilians, forming a sister group to all other families except the Rhinatrematidae Nussbaum, 1977 (Kamei et al. 2012). Therefore, this family is of particular importance for reconstructing the evolution of the caecilian skeleton, including the skull. Although Ichthyophiidae, with 58 currently recognized species, is the most speciose family of caecilians (Frost 2025), current knowledge of their skeletal morphology remains scarce. It is widely accepted that the crania of ichthyophiids are characterized by a combination of primitive and derived character states that are intermediate between those of the Rhinatrematidae and all other ‘higher’ caecilians, or Teresomata Wilkinson and Nussbaum, 2006 (Nussbaum 1977, 1979, 1983; Duellman and Trueb 1986; Wilkinson and Nussbaum 1996, 2006; Wake 2003). Compared to some more specialized burrowing caecilians, ichthyophiids are more often observed moving on the surface of the ground or in loose leaf litter (e.g., Kupfer et al. 2005) while some species are likely associated with streams (Geissler et al. 2015). All known Ichthyophiidae have a biphasic reproductive cycle with aquatic larvae hatching from eggs laid in burrows or underground chambers near the water (Duellman and Trueb 1986; Wilkinson and Nussbaum 2006). The skulls of the ichthyophiids studied thus far have more ossified elements than any other caecilian family and usually exhibit a compact well-ossified stegokrotaphic morphology (Taylor 1969a; Duellman and Trueb 1986; Wake 2003; Gower et al. 2010), though Nussbaum (1977) noted that some ichthyophiids have a ‘weakly stegokrotaphic’ skull morphology with comparatively large upper temporal fossae (e.g., Wilkinson et al. 2014; Bardua et al. 2019). Current knowledge of Ichthyophiidae osteology, cranial morphology and head musculature and innervation is based mostly on studies of Uraeotyphlus narayani Seshachar, 1939 (Ramaswami 1941; Nussbaum 1979) and several species of the genus Ichthyophis Fitzinger, 1826 (e.g., Müller 1835; Wiedersheim 1879; Sarasin and Sarasin 1887–1890; Burckhardt 1891; Peter 1898; Visser 1963; Taylor 1969a; Nussbaum 1977; Dünker et al. 2004; Kleinteich and Haas 2007; Kleinteich et al. 2008), but only a few of them were based on micro-CT data (Kleinteich et al. 2012; Wilkinson et al. 2014; Gower et al. 2017; Lowie et al. 2022; McGrath-Blaser et al. 2025; Santos et al. 2025).

The most speciose genus of Ichthyophiidae is Ichthyophis, which currently comprises 50 nominal species, 12 of which occur in Indochina (including Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, and Thailand) and southern China (Frost 2025). Ichthyophis species can be partitioned into two major coloration types: striped species with a pair of light-colored (yellow or cream) lateral stripes running from the head along the body flanks, and unstriped species with uniform brown, grayish, or blackish coloration (Taylor 1968; Geissler et al. 2015). Although it was demonstrated that the striped and unstriped species of Ichthyophis do not form monophyletic groups, and coloration types likely evolved several times independently in this genus (e.g., Gower et al. 2002; Nishikawa et al. 2012a), the presence or absence of lateral stripes remained a interspecifically diagnostic tool important for species identification in Ichthyophis (e.g., Taylor 1968; Geissler et al. 2015), though a substantial variation in the degree of lateral stripe development was reported for some species (Nussbaum and Gans 1980). Among the 12 species of Ichthyophis known to occur in Indochina and southern China, seven species are unstriped, i.e., Ichthyophis acuminatus Taylor, 1960; I. cardamomensis Geissler et al., 2015; I. catlocensis Geissler et al., 2015; I. chaloensis Geissler et al., 2015; I. laosensis Taylor, 1969; I. youngorum Taylor, 1960; and I. yangi Rao et al., 2024. It is noteworthy that most of these species are known from single or very few specimens, and four of them were described within the last decade based on concordant evidence from molecular and morphological data (Geissler et al. 2015; Rao et al. 2024).

Presently, four named Ichthyophis species are recorded from Vietnam: I. catlocensis, I. chaloensis, I. kohtaoensis Taylor, 1960 (including I. bannanicus as its junior synonym following Nishikawa et al. 2021), and I. nguyenorum Nishikawa, Matsui & Orlov, 2012 (Poyarkov et al. 2021a; Frost 2025). During our recent field surveys in the evergreen montane forests of Xuan Lien National Park in Thanh Hoa Province and Pu Hoat Nature Reserve in Nghe An Province in northern Vietnam, we encountered two unstriped caecilians specimens assigned to the genus Ichthyophis on the basis of their having a combination of a tertiary annular system and tentacle apertures distant from the eye (Wilkinson and Nussbaum 2006; Wilkinson et al. 2014). Subsequent phylogenetic analyses based on three mitochondrial DNA (hereafter, mtDNA) genes (cyt b, 12S rRNA, and 16S rRNA) confirmed its placement within the genus Ichthyophis and suggested that the Xuan Lien and Pu Hoat specimens represent a divergent lineage closely related to the recently described I. yangi from Yunnan Province, China, and I. chaloensis from central Vietnam. Closer examination of the external morphology, coloration, and osteological characteristics of the Xuan Lien and Pu Hoat specimens demonstrated clear differences from the other unstriped Ichthyophis of Indochina as well as from all other congeners. Integrating morphological and molecular data, we describe the Xuan Lien and Pu Hoat specimens of ichthyophiid caecilians from northern Vietnam as a new species. Furthermore, here we present the first detailed description of the cranial anatomy of Ichthyophis sp. from northern Vietnam based on newly generated micro-CT data allowing comparisons with available data for other members of Ichthyophiidae.

Material and Methods

Sampling

Fieldwork in Pu Hoat Nature Reserve in Nghe An Province, Vietnam, was conducted by N. A. Poyarkov and D. X. Le in May 2019, and in Xuan Lien National Park in Thanh Hoa Province, Vietnam, by A. M. Bragin, A. P. Yuzefovich, and D. X. Le in October 2023 (see Fig. 1). Permissions to conduct fieldwork and collect specimens were granted by the Department of Forestry, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development of Vietnam, and by the Forest Protection Departments of the People’s Committees of Nghe An Province (permit number #2089/UBND.VX of 03.04.2019) and Thanh Hoa Province (permit numbers #562/GP of 01.06.2022 and #179/SNN&PTNT-CCKL of 05.10.2023) of Vietnam. Geographic coordinates and altitude were obtained with a Garmin GPSMAP 60CSx GPS receiver (Garmin Ltd, USA) and recorded in datum WGS 84. A living specimen was photographed and subsequently euthanized by a 20% benzocaine solution; tissue samples (liver) were taken for genetic analyses and stored in 96% ethanol prior to specimen fixation in a 4% formaldehyde solution for 24 h with subsequent preservation in 70% ethanol. Collected specimens were deposited in the herpetological collections of the Zoological Museum of Moscow State University (ZMMU), Moscow, Russia, and of the Joint Vietnam-Russia Tropical Science and Technology Research Center (VRTC), Hanoi, Vietnam. Additionally, we employed published morphological and molecular data from the material deposited in the following herpetological collections: AMNH: American Museum of Natural History, New York, New York, USA; CAS: California Academy of Sciences Museum, San Francisco, California, USA; CBC: Centre for Biodiversity Conservation at the Royal University of Phnom Penh, Phnom Penh, Cambodia; FMNH: Field Museum, Chicago, Illinois, USA; IEBR: Institute of Ecology and Biological Resources, Vietnam Academy of Sciences and Technology, Hanoi, Vietnam; KIZ: Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan, China; KUHE: Graduate School of Human and Environmental Studies, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan; LSUHC: La Sierra University Herpetological Collection, Riverside, California, USA; MNHN: Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France; MZB: Museum Zoologicum Bogoriense, Java, Indonesia; MZMU: Museum of the Zoology Department, Mizoram University, Mizoram, India; NCSM: North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences, North Carolina, USA; NHMUK: Natural History Museum, United Kingdom (formerly BMNH), London, UK; ZFMK: Zoologisches Forschungsinstitut und Museum Alexander Koenig, Bonn, Germany; ZISP: Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia.

Figure 1. 

Distribution of the unstriped species of the genus Ichthyophis from Indochina and southern China. Symbols indicating Ichthyophis species are identical to those used in Figure 5; a dot in the center of a symbol indicates the type locality of a species. Localities: 1 Xuan Lien NP, Thanh Hoa Province, Vietnam; 2 Pu Hoat NR, Nghe An Province, Vietnam; 3 Maandi, Jinping County, Yunnan Province, China; 4 Cha Lo, Quang Binh Province, Vietnam; 5 Cat Loc, Cat Tien NP, Lam Dong Province, Vietnam; 6 Phnum Dalai, Phnom Samkos WS, Pursat Province, Cambodia; 7 Luang Prabang, the former French administrative centre of “Haute Laos” (following Geissler et al. 2015; but see the Discussion for the problem of the I. laosensis type locality); 8 Mae Wang, Chiang Mai Province, Thailand; 9 Muang Liep, Sayaboury Province, Laos; 10 Bhuping summer palace, Chiang Mai Province, Thailand; 11 Doi Ang Khang, Chiang Mai Province, Thailand.

Micro-computed tomography

To study the skeletal morphology of Ichthyophis sp., we examined X-ray projections for two collected specimens (ZMMU A-8208 and VRTC NAP08953) and performed detailed micro-CT scanning of the cranium and atlas for the better-preserved specimen (ZMMU A-8208). The scans were obtained with a SkyScan 1272 microtomograph (Bruker, Billerica, USA) equipped with a Hamamatsu L10101-67 source (Hamamatsu Photonics, Hamamatsu, Japan) and a Ximea xiRAY16 camera (Ximea GmbH, Münster, Germany) at the Biological Faculty of Moscow University. The specimens were scanned at a source voltage of 70 kV and a source current of 135 µA, without an X-ray filter. The samples were rotated 360° with a rotation step of 0.1, with 3 frames averaged per step. A stack of virtual cross sections through the specimens’ skeletal structures (3170 images of 2106×2887 resolution and a pixel size of 5.25 µm) was reconstructed with the software NRecon (Bruker micro-CT, Kontich, Belgium) and imported into the three-dimensional visualization software package Avizo 8.1 for subsequent processing and examination of osteological traits. The obtained scans were deposited in MorphoSource. Additionally, we prepared ­microCT scans of skulls for two other species of Ichthyophis for comparison purposes: I. nguyenorum (ZMMU NAP-03122) and I. supachaii Taylor, 1960 (ZMMU NAP-11349); these scans were also deposited in MorphoSource (see Data availability statement below).

Terminology and identification of the osteological features. We followed Wake (2003) and Palakkool et al. (2022) for the terminology of skull elements and their main parts, and we followed Norris and Hughes (1918), Maddin (2011), Maddin et al. (2012), and Palakkool et al. (2022) for identifying cranial foramina and describing details of the braincase. Additionally, for the description of morphological details of some skull bones (namely, the premaxilla and the maxillary part of the maxillopalatine) and the atlas, we followed terminology broadly used for the description of the corresponding structures in some salamanders (e.g., Skutschas 2009; Jia et al. 2019, 2020). For the full list of abbreviations of the osteological features, see Appendix 1.

External morphology

Measurements and counts generally followed Geissler et al. (2015). It should be noted that some meristic characters were taken different ways by previous researchers (e.g., Taylor, 1960, 1968, 1969), which complicates direct comparisons of our measurements with the literature data (see Kotharambath et al. 2024 for discussion). We used a Mitutoyo (Kanagawa, Japan) digital caliper to take the following measurements to the nearest 0.1 mm: total length, from snout tip to tail tip (TL); tail length, from the posterior end of vent slit to tip (TAL); body width at first nuchal groove (BW1); midbody width (BW2); body width at the anterior edge of cloacal disc (BW3); head length, from snout tip to first nuchal groove, measured ventrally (HL); head width, measured at mouth corners (HW); upper jaw length, from snout tip to corner of mouth (UJL); lower jaw length, from tip of lower jaw to corner of mouth (LJL); snout projection, from snout tip to anteriormost point of lower jaw (SP); distance between eye and lip, measured in lateral view (EL); snout length, from anterior border of the eye to snout tip (ES); interorbital distance (EE); internarial distance (NN), inter-tentacle distance, measured as the distance between the tentacle apertures (TT); eye-naris distance (EN); eye-tentacle aperture distance (ET); tentacle aperture-naris distance (TN); eye diameter, the widest diameter of the visible part of the eye (ED); and distance from eyes to top of head (ETH). Additionally, we took the following measurements for the description of the type series of the new species (modified from Kamei et al. 2009): length of the first collar directly behind the corner of the mouth (C1); length of the second collar directly behind the corner of the mouth (C2); distance between the tentacle aperture and the snout tip (STTA); distance between the tentacle aperture and the lip (LTA); and length of the cloacal disc (CD). We calculated the following ratios: (1) tentacle aperture-naris distance/eye-tentacle aperture distance (TN/ET); (2) head length/eye diameter (HL/ED); (3) snout projection/head length (SP/HL); (4) total length/tail length (TL/TAL); tail length/tentacle-snout distance (TL/STTA); and (5) total length/midbody width (TL/BW2).

In addition to measurements, counts were made of the following meristic characters: total number of annuli in dorsal count, from posterior margin of second collar (third nuchal groove) to tail cap (except the latter) (TAD); total number of annuli (except the tail cap) in ventral count (TAV); total number of annuli interrupted (at least one annular groove) by the cloacal disc (AV); total number of annuli posterior to the cloacal disc (TAT); the number of transverse grooves on dorsal surface of collar (TG); the number of premaxillary / maxillary teeth (PMM); the number of vomero-palatine teeth (VP); the number of outer mandibular teeth (DE, also sometimes referred to as dentary teeth); and the number of inner mandibular teeth (IM, also sometimes referred to as splenial teeth). All tooth counts included ankylosed teeth and empty sockets (counted from micro-CT scans). Comparative data for other species of Ichthyophis were obtained from the literature (e.g., Taylor 1960, 1968; Nishikawa et al. 2012a; Geissler et al. 2015; Rao et al. 2024). Morphological data from larval specimens were not used in comparisons with the new species type series.

Other abbreviations. Dist. – District; Is. – Island; NP: – National Park; NR – Nature Reserve; Prov.: – Province; WS – Wildlife Sanctuary.

Molecular laboratory methods

For the molecular phylogenetic analyses, total genomic DNA was isolated using the standard phenol chloroform-proteinase K extraction procedures with consequent isopropanol precipitation for a final concentration of about 1 mg/mL (protocols followed Hillis et al. 1996). We visualized the isolated total genomic DNA using agarose electrophoresis in the presence of ethidium bromide. We measured the concentration of total DNA in 1 µL using NanoDrop 2000 (Thermo Scientific) and consequently adjusted it to ca. 100 ng DNA/µL. We used polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to individually amplify three mtDNA fragments: complete sequences of cytochrome b (cyt b) as well as fragments of 12S rRNA and 16S rRNA genes. Table S1 summarizes the primers used for both PCR and sequencing.

For both cyt b and 12S–16S rRNA fragments we used the modified PCR protocol of Nishikawa et al. (2012a): (1) an initial denaturation step at 94°C for 4 min; (2) 33 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, annealing at 53°C for 30 s and extension at 72°C for 2 min; (3) a final extension at 72°C for 7 min; and (4) a cooling step at 4°C for storage. We ran all amplifications using an iCycler Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad). We loaded the PCR products onto 1% agarose gels in the presence of ethidium bromide and visualized them by electrophoresis. The successful targeted PCR products were purified by the Diatom DNA PCR Clean-Up Kit and outsourced to ­Evrogen (Moscow, Russia) for sequencing; sequence data collection and visualization were performed on an ABI 3730xl Automated Sequencer (Applied Biosystems). The obtained sequences were deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers PV088114PV088123 (see Table S2).

Molecular phylogeny

To estimate the phylogenetic relationships of the genus Ichthyophis, we used the newly obtained cyt b, 12S rRNA, and 16S rRNA sequences of two unstriped specimens from Xuan Lien NP and Pu Hoat NR, together with previously published sequences of these genes for the family Ichthyophiidae, including 25 nominal species and six unnamed species of the genus Ichthyophis (of them 23 striped and eight unstriped species) and four species of the genus Uraeotyphlus Peters, 1880. Altogether, the concatenated alignment of cyt b, 12S rRNA, and 16S rRNA fragments included sequences from 46 representatives of Ichthyophiidae; the sequences of Epicrionops marmoratus Taylor, 1968 and Rhinatrema bivittatum (Guérin-Méneville, 1838) (family Rhinatrematidae) were used to root the tree (data summarized in Table S2).

We aligned the nucleotide sequences using the default parameters in MAFFT online (Katoh et al. 2019), visually checked them in BioEdit 7.0.5.2 (Hall 1999) and adjusted them when required. The mean uncorrected genetic p distances between species of the genus Ichthyophis were calculated with MEGA 6.0 with the pairwise deletion option (Tamura et al. 2013) based on cyt b and 16S rRNA sequences. The best-fit substitution models for the data set were selected for genes and codon positions using PartitionFinder 2.1.1 (Lanfear et al. 2012) with corrected Akaike information criterion (AICc); substitution models were estimated for the 12S–16S rRNA region as one partition and the three codon positions (1st, 2nd, and 3rd positions) of the cyt b gene; gaps were treated as missing data.

We estimated phylogenetic trees for the concatenated mtDNA fragments data set. We inferred the phylogenetic relationships of Ichthyophis using Bayesian inference (BI) and maximum likelihood (ML) approaches. We used the IQ-TREE online server (Nguyen et al. 2015) to generate the ML tree and assessed the confidence in tree topology by 10000 ultrafast bootstrap replications (UFBS). We conducted BI in the terminal version of MrBayes 3.1.2 (Huelsenbeck and Ronquist 2001). Metropolis-coupled Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMCMC) analyses were run with one cold chain and three heated chains for 20 million generations and sampled every 2000 generations. The run was checked to ensure the effective sample sizes (ESS) were all above 200 by exploring the likelihood plots using TRACER v. 1.7 (Rambaut et al. 2018). We discarded the initial 1000 trees as burn-in. For BI, we assessed the confidence in tree topology using the posterior probability (PP) of the nodes (Huelsenbeck and Ronquist 2001). We a priori regard the nodes with UFBS values of 95% or higher and PP values over 0.95 as strongly supported; UFBS values between 95% and 90% and PP values between 0.95 and 0.90 were regarded as well-supported, and lower values were regarded as a lack of node support (Minh et al. 2013).

Results

Skull atlas of an Ichthyophis sp. from northern Vietnam

Osteology description

The following description is based on micro-computed tomographic reconstruction of the skull and the atlas of the female specimen ZMMU A-8208 from Xuan Lien NP in Thanh Hoa Province of Vietnam. The general morphology of the skull and the braincase are shown in Figures 2 and 3, respectively; morphology of the atlas is presented in Figure 4, morphology of individual skull bones is shown in Figures S1–S14.

Figure 2. 

General skull morphology of the holotype of Ichthyophis griseivermis sp. nov. (ZMMU A-8208, adult female, 206 mm total length). 3D reconstruction of the skull is shown with colored rendering in dorsal (A), ventral (B), anterior (C), posterior (D) and left lateral (E) views, and of the left lower jaw in labial (F) and lingual (G) views. Scale bar equals 3 mm. Abbreviations: bas – os basale; car – foramen for the carotid artery; ch – choana; corb – circumorbital; fm – foramen magnum; front – frontal; jf – jugular foramen; ltf – lower temporal fossa; mpc - mediopalatinal cavity; mxpal – maxillopalatine; nas – nasal; nos – nostrils; oc – occipital condyles; orb+tc – orbit and tentacular canal; par – parietal; pmx – premaxilla; psa – pseudoangular; prfr – prefrontal; psd – pseudodentary; pt – pterygoid; q – quadrate; smx – septomaxilla; sphen – sphenethmoid; st – stapes; sq – squamosal; utf – upper temporal fossa; vom – vomer; vf – vomeral foramen.

Figure 3. 

Braincase morphology of the holotype of Ichthyophis griseivermis sp. nov. (ZMMU A-8208, adult female). 3D reconstruction of the braincase is shown with colored rendering in dorsal (A), left lateral (B), and right medial (C) views, and of the isolated sphenethmoid in posterior (D) and anterior (E) views. Scale bar equals 1 mm. Abbreviations: Id – incisure for the dorsal branch of the olfactory nerve; Iv – foramen for the ventral branch of the olfactory nerve; II – incisure for the optic nerve; Vop – foramen for the deep ophthalmic branch of the trigeminal nerve; VII – foramen for the trunk of the facial nerve; VIIIa – foramen for the anterior branch of the auditory nerve; VIImd – foramina for the medial branches of the auditory nerve; VIIIp – foramen for the posterior branch of the auditory nerve; bca – basicranial articulation; car+VIIpal – foramen for the carotid artery and the palatal branch of the facial nerve; dmp – dorsomedial process of the sphenethmoid; dv? – incisure for the dorsal vein; fe – endolymphatic foramen; fper – perilymphatic foramen; fv – fenestra vestibuli; jf – jugular foramen; ns – nasal septum; sn – sola nasi (processus conchoides).

Figure 4. 

3D reconstruction of the atlas of the holotype of Ichthyophis griseivermis sp. nov. (ZMMU A-8208, adult female) in anterior (A), posterior (B), left lateral (C), dorsal (D), ventral (E), and right lateral (F) views. Scale bar equals 1 mm. Abbreviations: acot – anterior cotyles; mo – medial outgrowth; na – neural arch; pcot – posterior condyle; pzp – postzygopophyseal processes; scs – spinal cord support; snf – spinal nerve foramen.

General features of the skull. The cranium is heavily ossified, dorsoventrally flattened, and more like V-shaped in the dorsal view (with the maximum width at the level where the squamosal overlies the contact between the pterygoid and the quadrate) (Fig. 2A). The medial part of the cranial roof is composed of paired premaxillae, nasals, frontals, and parietals; laterally, the cranial roof includes paired septomaxillae, prefrontals, maxillopalatines, circumorbitals, and squamosals. These dermal bones constitute the major portion of the dorsal and lateral surfaces of the cranium (Fig. 2A, E). The palate is formed by the posteroventral parts of the premaxillae, paired wide vomers, the ventral parts of the maxillopalatines, and narrow pterygoids (Fig. 2B).

The braincase consists of the two well ossified compound bones: the sphenethmoid anteriorly and the os basale posteriorly (Fig. 3). The posteriormost part of the dorsal aspect of the cranium is constituted by the dorsal surface of the os basale, which is the only contribution of the braincase to the dorsal and lateral surfaces of the cranium (Fig. 2A, E). The posterior (occipital) and the posterolateral (otic) regions of the cranium are formed entirely by the os basale (Fig. 2D, E). The sphenethmoid is obscured by the dermal cranial roof bones (the nasals and frontals) dorsally, by the maxillopalatines laterally, and is partially obscured by the vomers and the palatal portions of maxillopalatines ventrally, so the posteriormost portion of this bone is still visible in the ventral aspect (Fig. 2B). The posterolateral aspect of the cranium contains the lateral portions of the os basale and pterygoids, the ventral portions of the quadrates and the stapes (Fig. 2E).

The cranium bears the following ten major external openings: the foramen magnum and the paired external nostrils, orbital apertures, upper and lower temporal fossae, and choanae. Additionally, the palatal aspect of the cranium contains the openings of the large mediopalatinal cavities (= interpterygoid vacuities) and the lower temporal fossae (= ventral openings of the adductor chambers) (both openings are much larger than the orbital apertures). The nostrils are relatively large, about the same size as the orbital apertures, rounded with terminal and anterior orientation bordered by the premaxillae (medially and ventrally), nasals (dorsally), and septomaxillae (laterally) (Fig. 2C). The orbital apertures are approximately the same size as the nostrils, oval, slightly dorsoventrally compressed, with an anterolateral orientation, and bordered by the circumorbitals (the dorsal and posterodorsal part of the orbital aperture) and the maxillopalatines (the rest of the orbital aperture) (Fig. 2E). The presence of the elongated semicrescent-shaped circumorbitals excludes the prefrontals, frontals, and squamosals from contacting the orbital apertures. The tentacular canal is open laterally, fused with the orbital aperture, and lies entirely in the maxillopalatine.

The dorsally oriented upper temporal fossae are elongated and slit-like, widening posteriorly (Fig. 2A). Each temporal fossa is bordered by the prefrontal anteriorly, by the frontal and the parietal dorsally and medially, and by the squamosal laterally and ventrally. The posterior end of the upper temporal fossa is open forming a space between the squamosal, the parietal and the os basale (Fig. 2A). Nussbaum (1977: 13; 1983: 547) noted that some ­Ichthy have ‘a zone of weakness or a very narrow gap between the squamosal and parietal that permits lateromedial movement of the cheek region,’ what he identified as as ‘weakly stegokrotaphic skull,’ without providing the details in which Ichthyophis species such condition is observed. In our specimen, the slit-like temporal fossae are wider, open posteriorly, and the area for the attachment of the adductor muscles on the dorsal surfaces of the cranial roof bones (namely, frontals and parietals) resembles the condition described for larval Ichthyophis specimens (see Kleinteich and Haas 2007). Therefore, we refer to this condition of the skull as weakly zygokrotaphic, though further studies are required to confirm if the lateral layer of m. adductor mandibulae externus sensu Wilkinson and Nussbaum (1997) (or m. levator mandibulae longus sensu Kleinteich and Haas 2007) is indeed passing through the upper temporal fossa or not.

The large foramen magnum (notably larger than the orbital aperture) faces posteriorly, is rounded and is entirely bordered by the os basale (Fig. 2D). The ventrally oriented choanae are rounded and slightly smaller than the orbital aperture (Fig. 2B). Each choana is bordered by the maxillopalatine and by the vomer anteromedially. The elongate mediopalatinal cavities are posterior to the choanae, approximately of the same width as the choanae and bordered by the maxillopalatines anteriorly, the pterygoids laterally, and the sphenethmoid and the os basale medially. The posterior ends of the mediopalatinal cavities are open; the pterygoids are located somewhat asymmetrically, with the right pterygoid located closer to the basipterygoid process of the os basale than the left one, suggesting some kinesis in this articulation. The lower temporal fossae are situated laterally to the mediopalatinal cavities, are teardrop-shaped (with a pointed anterior part) and bordered by the squamosals laterally, the quadrates posterolaterally and posteriorly, the os basale medially, and the maxillopalatines anteromedially (Fig. 2B).

As in all caecilians (Nussbaum 1977, 1983), the lower jaws consist of the two compound and extensively overlapping bones: the dentigerous pseudodentaries and edentulous pseudoangulars; the latter articulate with the quadrates and have an elongated retroarticular process (Fig. 2F, G). The anterior end of the lower jaw is subterminal (Fig. 2E, F).

Dentition. The dentigerous elements of the cranium (upper jaw) are the premaxillae, the maxillopalatine, and the vomers. The only dentigerous element of the lower jaw is the pseudodentary. The dentition is organized as two (labial and lingual) continuous sub-parallel rows of teeth on both the cranium and the lower jaw. The upper jaw dentition includes a labial ‘premaxillary-maxillary’ tooth row, which is present on the premaxillae and the maxillary portion of the maxillopalatine, and a lingual ‘vomero-palatine’ row (sensu Wake 1976), which is situated on the vomers and the palatinal portion of the maxillopalatine (Fig. 2B). There are 22/22 teeth on each side of the cranium in the premaxillary-maxillary row (8/8 on the premaxillae and 13/15 on the maxillary portions of the maxillopalatine) and 21/22 teeth in the vomero-palatine row (10/11 on the vomers and 11/11 on the palatinal portion of the maxillopalatine). The premaxillary-maxillary and vomero-palatine tooth rows are approximately equal in length. The vomero-palatine row extends posteriorly to the anterior border of the lower temporal fossa.

The lower jaw dentition includes a labial ‘dentary’ (or outer mandibular) tooth row that is located on the dentary portion of the pseudodentary and a lingual ‘splenial’ (or inner mandibular) tooth row (Fig. 2G). The inner mandibular row (also referred to as ‘adsymphyseal tooth row’ sensu Kligman et al. 2023) is placed on the medial portion of the pseudodentary (the origin of the medial part of the pseudodentary in caecilians is unclear, and its homologization with the lower jaw bones of other tetrapods is difficult; see discussion in Kligman et al. 2023). There are 18/20 teeth in the outer mandibular tooth row and 12/13 teeth in the inner mandibular row. The outer mandibular tooth row is notably longer than the inner mandibular tooth row.

All functional teeth are bicuspid and pedicellate. The crowns of functional teeth are moderately sized, with gently posteriorly curved tips. The teeth of labial rows (premaxillary-maxillary row on the cranium and outer mandibular tooth row on the lower jaw) are approximately the same size as the teeth of lingual rows (vomero-palatine row on the cranium and the inner mandibular row on the lower jaw). The replacement teeth are present lingually to the base of the corresponding functional teeth.

Premaxillae. The paired dentigerous premaxillae articulate with each other medially to form the anterior margin of the snout (Fig. S1). Each premaxilla contacts with the corresponding nasal dorsally, septomaxilla posterodorsally, vomer posteromedially, and maxillopalatine posteriorly, and consists of three main parts: the pars dorsalis (= dorsal or alary process), the pars dentalis, and the pars palatina. Pars dorsalis is relatively long and narrow with a dorsal apex that is sharply pointed and set within a deep notch of the nasal (Fig. S1A). There are two large neurovascular canals presumably for the ophthalmic division of the trigeminal nerve and the associated blood vessels, which nurture the skin, passing through the base and middle parts of the dorsal process. In the posterior view, these canals are visible as large foramina and in the medial view as short deep grooves (Fig. S1B). These canals branch within the bone and emerge on the external surface through several openings. The pars dentalis of each premaxilla is short and slightly curved along the contour of the snout (Fig. S1A). Its lingual surface bears closely spaced pedicellate teeth that form the anterior part of the labial tooth row.

The posterior end of each pars dentalis is penetrated by one oblique neurovascular canal that enters the bone posteriorly and almost immediately exits onto the dorsal surface, opening into a deep short groove. This canal is presumably for the passage of the medial branch of the maxillary division of the trigeminal nerve and the associated blood vessels. The pars palatina is a wide ledge along the lingual aspect of the pars dentalis (Fig. S1C, E). In ventral view, the inner margin of this bony ledge runs parallel to the curvature of the outer edge of the premaxilla, except the median part, where it has a pronounced projection (Fig. S1C). The pars palatina articulates along its entire length with the vomer to contribute to the anterior part of the palate.

Maxillopalatines. The paired maxillopalatines are compound dentigerous bones with a complex shape (Fig. S2). Each bone consists of a lateral maxillary part and a medial palatine part. Each maxillopalatine articulates with the premaxilla anteriorly, the septomaxilla anterodorsally, the prefrontal dorsally, the squamosal posteriorly, and the vomer and the pterygoid medially to contribute to the lateral part of the palate.

The maxillary part of each maxillopalatine has a short anterior process with a blunt anterior end (for the contact with the premaxilla anteriorly and the septomaxilla dorsally), the pars facialis (= facial, dorsal process) in the anterior half of the maxilla (for the contact with the prefrontal) (Fig. S2A), and the posterior process for the articulation with the squamosal posteriorly (Fig. S2D). The central part of each pars facialis is penetrated by a large foramen (Fig. S2A, B). The medial surface of the pars facialis around this large foramen bears a deep oval depression that is presumably holding the vomeronasal organ (Fig. S2A).

The posterior part of each pars facialis has a narrow, sharp, and posterodorsally oriented process that borders an anterodorsal edge of the orbital aperture (Fig. S2A). The posterior process of the maxillary part forms the posteroventral border of the orbital aperture. There is a wide ventral gutter-like anterolaterally oriented groove between the sharp process of pars facialis and the posterior process that is confluent with the orbital aperture and corresponds to the tentacular canal (therefore, the tentacular canal is an open groove, but not a closed canal separated from the orbital aperture) (Fig. S2B).

The pars palatina of each maxillary part is a wide ledge that contacts the vomer (at the level of the anterior process and the pars facialis of the maxillary part, anterior to the palatine part of the bone) and fuses to the palatine part of the bone posteriorly. The maxillary part bears a labial tooth row (with 13 pedicellate teeth on the left and 15 teeth on the right bone).

The palatine part of each maxillopalatine has the anterior and medial processes that form the anterior, lateral, and posterior borders of the choana and the posterior process for the articulation with the pterygoid posteromedially (Fig. S2C, D). The end of the anterior process of the palatine part is dorsally curved and contacts with a similarly curved crest on the dorsal surface of the vomer; these two structures border a large concavity dorsally. According to Sarasin and Sarasin (1887–1890) and Palakkool et al. (2022), this concavity contains the ‘Choanenschleimbeutal’ (= ‘choanal mucous sac’). Each palatine part bears a lingual teeth row. The neurovascular system of the bone is complex and includes a network of canals that access the external surface of the bone through several openings. These canals are presumably for the passage of the branches of the maxillary and ophthalmic divisions of the trigeminal nerve and the associated blood vessels.

Septomaxillae. The paired septomaxillae are small bony elements that form the lateral borders of the nostrils (Fig. S3). Each septomaxilla contacts the nasal dorsally and posterodorsally, the premaxilla anteroventrally, the maxillopalatine posteroventrally, and has a narrow contact with the prefrontal posteriorly. The anterior portion of each bone is rounded in the anterior view and has shaped like an open tube, with dorsal and ventral processes (Fig. S3A). The anterior dorsal process has a ledge-like medial portion. The posterior part of each bone is triangular in lateral view. The ventral edge of each bone is slightly inflected medially. The lateral surface bears numerous neurovascular foramina that are connected with a longitudinal canal on the medial surface of the posterior part of the bone; this canal is open medially and looks like a deep longitudinal groove (Fig. S3B). The neurovascular foramina and the corresponding canal/groove are presumably for the passing of the branch of the ophthalmic division of the trigeminal nerve and the associated blood vessels.

Nasals. Each nasal is a flat and anteroposteriorly elongated bone (the ratio of its maximum width to the midline length is about 0.44) (Fig. S4). Each nasal is a large bone nearly the same size as the parietal. Each bone is trapezoidal, with a tapering posterior process. Each nasal contacts the premaxilla anteriorly, the septomaxilla anterolaterally, the prefrontal laterally, and the frontal posterolaterally. The paired nasals articulate with each other medially along their entire length. Anteriorly, the nasals contribute to the dorsal margin of the nostril. The dorsal surface of each bone bears several neurovascular foramina in the anterior and central portions, presumed to be for branches of the ophthalmic division of the trigeminal nerve and the associated blood vessels (Fig. S4B).

Frontals. Each frontal is a flat bone, longer than wide (the ratio of its maximum width to the maximum length is about 0.46), with its maximum width approximately at the level of mid-length (Fig. S5). Each frontal is somewhat smaller than the nasal and the parietal. The anterior portion is triangular in dorsal and ventral views, with the top oriented anterolaterally. The posterior portion is blunt and rounded in dorsal and ventral views. On the dorsal surface, the anteromedial edge of the anterior portion bears a wide facet for contact with the nasal (Fig. S5B, nf), and the anterolaterally edge of the anterior portion bears a facet for contact with the prefrontal (Fig. S5B, C). On the ventral surface, the anteromedial edge bears a deep groove-like indentation, forming the dorsal part of the canal presumably for the dorsal olfactory nerve (Fig. S5A). Each frontal contacts the nasal anteromedially, prefrontal anterolaterally, and the parietal posteriorly. The paired frontals contact each other along about one-third of their lengths; they are widely separated by the posterior process of the nasal anteriorly and by the anteromedial portions of the parietals posteriorly. The lateral edge of each bone forms the medial border of the temporal fossa. The ridge (Fig. S5C), formed by the lateral edge of each bone, presumably acts as an attachment point for the long adductor of the lower jaw (m. adductor mandibulae longus) (see Lowie et al. 2023). The ventral surface of the lateral edge bears a ventrolaterally oriented, pronounced ridge for contact with the sphenethmoid (Fig. S5C). The dorsal surface of each bone bears several neurovascular foramina, presumed to be for branches of the ophthalmic division of the trigeminal nerve and the associated blood vessels (Fig. S5B).

Parietals. Each parietal is a large trapezoidal and flat bone (Fig. S6); its lateral edge is slightly curved ventrally; parietals are the largest bones of the cranial roof. Each parietal is anteroposteriorly elongated (the ratio of its maximum width to the midline length is about 0.48), with the maximum width approximately at the level of the posterior third of its length. Each parietal is slightly larger than the nasal. Each parietal contacts the frontal anteriorly, the os basale laterally, and overlaps the tip of the dorsomedial process of the sphenethmoid anteromedially and the os basale posteriorly. The paired parietals contact with each other medially along their entire lengths.

The anterior part of the dorsal surface of each bone has a wide, semicircular facet for the overlying frontal (Fig. S6B). Posteriorly to the frontal facet, the dorsal surface divides into the flat medial area, tapering posteriorly, and the slightly curved lateral area. The anterolateral edge of the flat medial area bears a rounded ridge. This ridge is a direct continuation of the similar ridge on the frontal, extending the presumed attachment point for the long adductor of the lower jaw. The lateral curved area is presumed to be for the attachment of the m. depressor mandibulae (Lowie et al. 2023). The lateral edge of each bone is flattened; it faces ventrally and bears a facet for contact with the os basale. The anteromedial part of the ventral surface of each bone bears a small facet for contact with the sphenethmoid. The posterior part of the ventral surface of each bone has a wide facet for the os basale.

Squamosals. Each squamosal is a large (about the same size as the parietal), trapezoidal, and slightly convex bone that forms most of the lateral surface of the temporal region of the cranial roof (Fig. S7). Each squamosal contacts the circumorbital anterodorsally, the maxillopalatine anteroventrally, and overlaps the quadrate posteroventrally. The dorsal edge of each squamosal forms the lateral border of the temporal fossa. The anteroventral part of the lateral surface of each bone has a triangular socket-like facet for contact with the posterior process of the maxillopalatine. The posterior part of the lateral surface has a wide depression, presumably for the attachment of the m. depressor mandibulae (Lowie et al. 2023). On the lateral surface, there are several foramina in the central part and along the anterior border of each bone, dorsally to the maxillopalatine facet (Fig. S7A). These foramina are presumed to be for the branches of the mandibular division of the trigeminal nerve and the associated blood vessels. The posterior part of the medial surface of the bone has a wide facet for presumed contact with the processus ascendens of the quadrate that is bordered by a ridge anteriorly (Fig. S7B).

Prefrontals. Each prefrontal is a flat and relatively small bone (slightly larger than the septomaxilla), elongated anteroposteriorly (the ratio of its maximum width to the midline length is about 0.3) (Fig. S8). Each prefrontal contacts the septomaxilla anteriorly, the nasal anterodorsally, the frontal dorsally and posterodorsally, and the maxillopalatine anteroventrally, ventrally, and posteroventrally. The ventral edge of each bone is thickened and has a facet for contact with the pars facialis (namely, an elongated sharp process) of the maxillopalatine. On the left side of the cranium, each prefrontal appears to be fused with this process.

Circumorbitals. Each circumorbital is a small, crescent-shaped, and curved bone, widely open ventrally, that forms the dorsal and posterodorsal border of the orbital aperture (Fig. S9); it was referred to as postfrontal in some earlier works (Taylor 1969a); these crescentic bones are unique to Ichthyophiidae among caecilians (Nussbaum 1977, 1979; Wilkinson and Nussbaum 1999, 2006). Each circumorbital loosely contacts the squamosal posterodorsally. The anterior and posterior ends of each bone are uneven and bear small notches; circumorbitals are symmetric in shape.

Vomers. Each vomer is a large (about the same size as the nasal) and flat dentigerous bone that forms most of the anterior part of the palate (Fig. S10). Each vomer is subtriangular in the ventral view, with the maximum width at the level just behind the vomerine foramen. Each vomer contacts the premaxilla anteriorly, the maxillopalatine anterolaterally and laterally, the sphenethmoid dorsally, and overlaps the os basale posteriorly. The paired vomers articulate with each other medially along their entire length. Each vomer forms the medial border of the choana. The posterior edge of each vomer is situated slightly anteriorly to the center of the palate (about 44–45% of the cranium length).

The ventral surface of each vomer bears an anterior part of the lingual (= vomero-palatine) tooth row (with 10 functional teeth on the left and 11 on the right bone) that is curved along the anterolateral edge of the bone and is parallel to the labial tooth row. There is a large vomerine foramen in the central part of the ventral surface (Fig. S10A).

The dorsal surface of each vomer is complex. The anterior part bears an anterodorsally oriented premaxillary process that is in articulation with the pars dorsalis of the premaxilla (Fig. S10B). The base of the process is perforated by a longitudinal canal presumably for the ophthalmic division of the trigeminal nerve and the associated blood vessels that continue into the corresponding canal in the premaxilla. Posteriorly, there is a longitudinal groove that runs parallel to the medial line and almost reaches the level of the middle of each bone. Laterally and posterolaterally to this groove, the dorsal surface has a bulge. This bulge is limited posterolaterally by the curved crest. The bulge contains the inner vomerine cavity that opens ventrally through the vomerine foramen and posteriorly and posterolaterally through the neurovascular canals. The curved crest separates a large concavity from the bulge (Fig. S10B). As mentioned above, this concavity is dorsally bordered by the anterior process of the palatine part of the maxillopalatine and the curved crest on the dorsal surface of the vomer and presumably contains the ‘Choanenschleimbeutal’ sensu Sarasin and Sarasin (1887–1890) and Palakkool et al. (2022).

Pterygoids. Each pterygoid is a small and anteroposteriorly elongated bone (Fig. S11). Each pterygoid contacts with the maxillopalatine anterolaterally and with the quadrate posterodorsally. Each pterygoid forms the lateral border of the mediopalatinal cavities (= interpterygoid vacuities) and the medial border of the lower temporal fossae. Each pterygoid consists of the anteromedially oriented anterior process, the dorsomedially oriented basal process, and the posteroventrally oriented posterior process (Fig. S11A). In lateral view, the ventral edge of the posterior process is situated barely below the level of the tips of the teeth of the labial (premaxillary-maxillary) row. The basal process and the posterior process comprise the expanded and subvertical portion of each bone. The anterior process is tapering anteriorly, and it contacts the posterior portion of the palatal part of the maxillopalatine anterolaterally. The basal process is low, and its posterodorsal part contacts the quadrate. There is no pronounced contact between the basal process of each pterygoid and the os basale.

Quadrates. Each quadrate is a relatively small bone that forms a joint with the lower jaw (= the articular facet for the pseudoangular) (Fig. S12). Each quadrate contacts with the pterygoid anteroventrally and is largely overlapped by the squamosal dorsolaterally. Each quadrate consists of two distinct parts: the condylar portion and the moderately elongated processus ascendens (sensu Palakkool et al. 2022) (Fig. S12A, E). The condyle of each quadrate is lateromedially narrowed, with a depressed middle part. The condyle faces ventrolaterally. The long axis of the condyle is situated at an angle of 50° to the median axis of the skull. The processus ascendens has a relatively wide base and an ascending part narrowing dorsomedially (Fig. S12B). The dorsolateral surface of the processus ascendens has a wide facet for contact with the medial surface of the squamosal. There are three processes associated with the base of the processus ascendens: the elongated anteromedial process for the contact with the pterygoid, the posterolaterally oriented processus oticus (sensu Palakkool et al. 2022), and the short anterolateral process (= processus jugalis sensu Ramaswami 1941) (Fig. S12B, E). The anteromedial process is shelf-like; its ventral surface is coarse and forms a shallow wide groove for a syndesmotic connection with the lateral flanges of the os basale and the pterygoid. The processus oticus has a very short base, which is semicircular in the outline, and a thin posterior flange on its dorsal surface, which covers the cartilaginous connection between the processus oticus and the columellar process of the stapes. The anterolateral process has a wave-like outline (Fig. S12A, B) forming two distinct notches for the syndesmotic connection with the lateral edge of the squamosal.

Sphenethmoid. The sphenethmoid consists of the laterally expanded main body, the elongated anteriorly projecting nasal septum, and the posteriorly projecting dorsomedial process (Fig. 3). The main body accounts for slightly less than half of the total length of the sphenethmoid. The lateral wall of the main body has a relatively long and broad anterolateral process, which forms a flat facet for contact with the frontal. Ventrally to the process, the lateral wall forms a short canal with an anterodorsally oblique posterior margin presumably for the deep optic branch of the trigeminal nerve (Fig. 3B). The posterior edge of the lateral wall, behind this canal, bears one to three foramina of different sizes. Two dorsally prominent structures referred to as sola nasi by Maddin et al. (2012) are present but weakly ossified (Fig. 3A, E); these structures were referred to as processus conchoides or eminentia olfactoria by earlier authors (e.g., Sarasin and Sarasin 1887–1890). The ventral surface of the main body bears a deep medial groove for contact with the parasphenoid rostrum of the os basale. The posterior margin of the floor of the sphenethmoid is deeply incised, exposing a large area of the os basale ventral to it. The nasal septum dorsoventrally tapers slightly towards the tip (Fig. 3B). Its dorsal sutural surface for contact with the nasals has a uniform shape along the whole length of the septum. The ventral sutural surface of the septum has a small anterior expansion and forms a wide lateral flange in its posterior half, which fuses with the processus conchoides, forming a deep cavity presumably for the ventral branches of the olfactory nerves. The foramina presumed to be for the ventral branches of the olfactory nerves are located somewhat close to the midline of the sphenethmoid. The dorsal branches of the olfactory nerves are presumably not confined within the anterior wall of the sphenethmoid and pass through a cavity formed by its dorsal edge. The dorsomedial process has the same width as the nasal septum and does not extend behind the level of the medial wall (Fig. 3B).

Os basale. The os basale consists of the main body, formed by the fusion of the occipital and otic bones, the ossified antotic walls, and the ventral part formed by the parasphenoid (Fig. 3). The parasphenoid rostrum ends in a sharp point, not reaching the base of the nasal septum (Fig. 3B). The ventral surface of the rostrum bears a W-shaped facet for contact with the vomers. The body of the parasphenoid bears distinct lateral flanges, which form the surface for the basicranial joint. Posteriorly to the basicranial joint, a large foramen presumably leading to the carotid artery canal system is present on the ventral surface of the parasphenoid. Upon entering the parasphenoid, the carotid canal is immediately divided into two grooves, which run anteriorly along the medial and the lateral sides of the antotic wall. The posterior edge of the parasphenoid is reaching the level of the base of the condyles and bears a pair of robust semicircular ridges running towards the lateral margins of the otic capsules. The dorsal surface of the parasphenoid bears distinct depressions for the cerebral hemispheres and the hypophysis (Fig. 3A).

The antotic wall has a weak incisure presumably for the ophthalmic nerve on its anterior edge and a large subcircular foramen in its posterior portion, through which the branches of the trigeminal nerve presumably exit the braincase (Fig. 3B, C). The dorsoposterior edge of this foramen has a large incisure, presumably for passage of the dorsal vein. The otic region has well-developed dorsal processes, which meet each other on the midline without fusion (Fig. 3A). Anterior to the processes, there is a deep facet for the contact with the parietal. The fenestra vestibuli is large, circular, and slightly incises the lateral margin of the otic capsule when viewed posteriorly (Fig. 2D) (for comparison of this character see Maddin et al. 2012). Anterior to the fenestra vestibuli, the dorsal surface of the os basale bears a small anterolateral flange. The condyles are semicircular and lie far apart from each other (Fig. 2D).

The medial wall (= inner surface) of the otic capsule region bears a number of foramina. The anterior-most foramen is presumed to be for the trunk of the facial nerve (Fig. 3C). Upon entering the foramen, the nerve is presumably almost immediately divided into the palatal branch, which passes anteriorly into the medial carotid canal, and the hyomandibular branch, which passes posteriorly above the stapes. Immediately posterior and dorsal to this foramen, there is a much smaller foramen leading to the ampulla of the anterior semicircular canal—presumably for the anterior auditory nerve (Fig. 3C). The medial auditory nerve presumably enters the ear capsule through the four similarly sized small foramina, which chaotically perforate the medial wall behind the level of the facial foramen (Fig. 3C). Posterior to these small foramina, there is a slightly larger and more dorsally positioned foramen presumably for the posterior auditory nerve (Fig. 3C). Posterior to the auditory nerves foramina, there is the perilymphatic foramen, which is the largest and has an oval outline (Fig. 3C). Dorsally to the perilymphatic foramen, almost at the base of the dorsal process of the os basale, there is an endolymphatic foramen, which has an anterodorsally oblique outline. The jugular foramen opens laterally at the base of the condyle and can be seen in the lateral view (Fig. 3B, C).

Stapes. Each stapes is a small bone that overlaps the fenestra ovalis (Fig. S13). Each stapes consists of a footplate and a columellar process (= style) (Fig. S13A). The footplate is oval and dorsoventrally compressed. There is a small foramen perforating the footplate dorsally to the base of the columellar process. The columellar process is anterodorsally oriented and extends in the direction of the processus oticus of the quadrate (but does not contact it). The columellar process ends in a depression indicating that in life its distal-most end was finished in cartilage. The base of the columellar process is dorsoventrally expanded, forming a robust circular ridge (Fig. S13C, E). The stapedial foramen is absent; however, there is a deep groove formed by the ventral part of the footplate and the ridge of the base of the columellar process (Fig. S13E); the stapedial artery presumably passes through this groove.

Pseudodentaries. The paired elongated dentigerous pseudodentaries articulate with each other medially in the symphyseal area to form the anterior tip of the mandible (Fig. S14). The posterior half of each bone is overlapped by the pseudoangular medially (lingually) (Fig. S14C). Each bone is the widest in the anterior presymphyseal part (in dorsal and ventral views). Each bone has a relatively straight occlusal margin and a nearly similar depth along its entire length except for the tapering posterior end. Each pseudodentary has a pronounced ‘splenial’ ridge (sensu Palakkool et al. 2022) bearing a lingual inner mandibular tooth row at its anterior and central portions (Fig. S14C). The posterior portion of the ‘splenial’ ridge lacks teeth. There is a distinct medial ridge at the level of the posterior half of the inner mandibular tooth row, which forms a facet for contact with the anterior process of the pseudoangular.

The labial outer mandibular tooth row is longer than the lingual inner mandibular tooth row and terminates at the level of the posterior end of the ‘splenial’ ridge. There are numerous neurovascular foramina (Fig. S14A) that presumably represent the openings of the inner canals for the branches of the mandibular division of the trigeminal nerve (external and alveolar branches) and the alveolar branch of the facial nerve (Norris and Hughes 1918).

The external branch of the mandibular division of the trigeminal nerve (r. mandibularis externus) presumably enters the pseudodentary through two large foramina on the lingual side posterior to the level of the posterior ends of the outer and inner mandibular tooth rows. After passing through the bone, it exits through numerous foramina at the base of the teeth on the lingual side and along the entire length of the pseudodentary on the labial side (Fig. S14A, C). The combined alveolar branches of the mandibular division of the trigeminal nerve and of the facial nerve presumably pass in a groove below the facet for contact with pseudoangular.

Pseudoangulars. Each pseudoangular is an elongate bone that overlaps the pseudodentary medially (lingually) (Fig. S14C). Each pseudoangular consists of the anterior process, the processus condyloideus, the processus internus, and the retroarticular process. The anterior process is tapering anteriorly. The processus condyloideus (= condyle) is situated on the dorsal margin of the bone, anterior to the retroarticular process, and forms a joint with the cranium (= the articular facet for the quadrate) (Fig. S14A). The processus internus is a small lingually oriented projection on the lingual surface of the bone, ventrally to the processus condyloideus (Fig. S14B). Anteriorly to the processus condyloideus, the dorsal margin of each bone has a high curved ridge and a high dorsal projection. The posterior end of the curved ridge terminates between the processus condyloideus and the processus internus, and the anterior end of this ridge is fused with the dorsal projection. The anterior end of the curved ridge and the dorsal projection border a large foramen dorsolaterally (Fig. S14B). This is the foramen of the canalis primordialis presumably for the passing of the mandibular division of the trigeminal nerve and the mandibular artery. Ventrally to the foramen of the canalis primordialis, the labial surface of the bone bears a large foramen presumably for the passage of the intermandibular branch of the mandibular division of the trigeminal nerve (Fig. S14C).

The retroarticular process is elongated, with its rounded posterior end oriented nearly dorsally (Fig. S14F). At the base of the retroarticular process, posterior to the processus internus, there is a large oblique foramen presumably for the passage of the alveolar branch of the facial nerve (Fig. S14F).

Postcranium

Atlas. The atlantal centrum is very short (Fig. 4). The anterior cotyles are large and have a crescent shape in the anterior view (Fig. 4A). The articular surfaces of the anterior cotyles have a complex, saddle-like shape, with a larger lateral portion facing anterodorsally and a smaller medial portion facing ventrolaterally. The lateral portions are inclined dorsally (at about 35° from the vertical plane), and their articular surfaces are nearly flat (Fig. 4C, F). In the anterior view, the medial portions are situated at about 50° from the horizontal plane. The left and right anterior cotyles are widely separated and do not contact along the midline. The intercotylar tubercle (= odontoid process; = tuberculum interglenoideum), the transverse processes (= rib-bearers), the ventrolateral ridges, the lateral alar ridges, the lateral depressions, and the hypapophysis are absent as in other caecilians. The posterior cotyle is nearly circular in posterior outline. A large spinal nerve foramen perforates the base of the neural arch. On the left side of the atlas, this foramen is paired (which is also the case for all of the trunk vertebrae) (Fig. 4C).

The atlantal neural arch is high. In the lateral view, the anterior edge of the neural arch is oblique; its dorsal part projects anteriorly beyond the level of the anterior edge of the anterior cotyles. The neural spine is not well pronounced, but there is a very low and swollen median ridge. The anterior part of the dorsal surface of the neural arch is smooth. The posterior part of the dorsal surface of the neural arch is lower than the anterior part and bears a low median depression. The postzygapophyseal processes are oriented ventrolaterally (at approximately 20° from the midline) and are elongate and narrow in ventral outline. The neural canal is broad, high, and nearly round in its posterior outline. The inner surface of the base of the neural arch bears a pair of spinal cord supports that extend medially into the neural canal (Fig. 4B). The dorsal surface of the centrum bears a small medial outgrowth at the level of the spinal cord supports.

Updated matrilineal genealogy of Ichthyophiidae

Sequence variation. A total of 3967 aligned base pairs (1143 bp from cyt b, and 2824 bp from the fragment containing 12S rRNA and 16S rRNA genes) were obtained for our study. Sequence characteristics, including the estimated transition/transversion bias, nucleotide frequencies, and suggested best-fit models of DNA evolution for each genetic marker and partition, are summarized in Table S3. We deposited the newly obtained sequences in GenBank (see Table S2 for the accession numbers and voucher details; the final alignment is available upon request).

Phylogenetic relationships. ML and BI analyses of our mtDNA alignment recovered trees with identical topologies, except for a few relationships that do not affect our interpretations of the results (Fig. 5). Our updated matrilineal genealogy was generally consistent with the earlier works of Nishikawa et al. (2012a), Wilkinson et al. (2014), Geissler et al. (2015), and Rao et al. (2024), and unambiguously confirmed the reciprocal monophyly of two major groups within the Ichthyophiidae, corresponding to the genus Ichthyophis (100/1.0; hereafter, branch support values are given for ML UFBS and BI PP values, respectively) and Uraeotyphlus (100/1.0). The position of ‘Ichthyophisbombayensis Taylor, 1960 (including its junior synonym ‘I.peninsularis Taylor, 1960) is especially interesting as this species supposedly was treated as a sister group to all other Uraeotyphlus species (100/1.0) in accordance with earlier studies of the group (e.g., Nishikawa et al. 2012a; Wilkinson et al. 2014). This phylogenetic position recently prompted Dubois et al. (2021) to formally transfer this species to Uraeotyphlus, a taxonomy that is now widely accepted (Frost 2025). In agreement with the earlier data (Gower et al. 2002; Nishikawa et al. 2012a), the striped and unstriped species of Ichthyophiidae were intermixed with each other and did not form respective monophyletic groups (Fig. 5).

Figure 5. 

Maximum Likelihood (ML) phylogenetic tree of the genus Ichthyophis derived from the analysis of 3967 bp of cyt b, 12S rRNA, and 16S rRNA mtDNA gene sequences. For voucher specimen information and GenBank accession numbers, see Table S2. Numbers at the nodes correspond to ML UFBS/BI PP support values, respectively. Species symbols and locality numbers correspond to those provided on the map in Figure 1. Unstriped species of Ichthyophiidae are shaded in grey. The thumbnail shows the holotype of Ichthyophis griseivermis sp. nov. in life (ZMMU A-8208; denoted by an asterisk in the tree); photograph by A. M. Bragin.

Intragenerically, our analyses revealed four deeply-diverged clades with unclear phylogenetic relationships (see Fig. 5). Clade A (100/1.0) regrouped two species from Northeastern India: striped I. moustakius Kamei et al., 2009, and I. cf. garoensis Pillai & Ravichandran, 1999, while Clade B (100/1.0) included two species from Sri Lanka: striped I. glutinosus (Linnaeus, 1758) and unstriped I. orthoplicatus Taylor, 1965; the phylogenetic placement of the clades A and B with respect to the remaining Ichthyophis species remained unclear. Clade C (89/0.93) included two striped taxa from southern peninsular India, i.e., I. tricolor Annandale, 1909 and I. cf. beddomei Peters, 1880; this clade received low support in ML analysis and was moderately supported in BI analysis; it was reconstructed as a sister group of Clade D, which joined all the remaining species of Ichthyophis, though only with low branch support values (81/0.90).

Clade D (99/1.0) was well-supported and regrouped Ichthyophis taxa from East and Southeast Asia (including northeastern India). It was further subdivided into three major subclades (Fig. 5). Subclade D1 (100/1.0) included three unstriped species of Ichthyophis from Indochina and southern China: I. chaloensis, I. yangi, and Ichthyophis sp. from northern Vietnam; phylogenetic relationships among these three species remained essentially unresolved. Subclade D2 (95/0.98) included two unstriped species: I. lakimi Nishikawa, Matsui & Yambun, 2012 from Sabah, Borneo, and I. mindanaoensis Taylor, 1960 from the Philippines, along with a number of striped species from Borneo, namely I. biangularis Taylor, 1965, I. pauli Nishikawa et al., 2013, I. cf. asplenius Taylor, 1965, and I. nigroflavus Taylor, 1960 (the two latter species were also reported from the Malay Peninsula and Sumatra), as well as two unnamed species, Ichthyophis sp. A and Ichthyophis sp. B from Borneo. Subclade D3 (100/1.0) included an array of species from mainland Southeast Asia (including northeastern India) and Sundaland. The striped species from Myanmar and northeastern India (I. benjii Lalremsanga et al., 2021; I. khumhzi Kamei et al., 2009; and I. multicolor Wilkinson et al., 2014) formed a group (95/1.0) that is sister to all the remaining species from Indochina and Sundaland (98/0.99). Within this former group, I. benjii from Mizoram, India, was a sister species of I. multicolor from Myanmar and I. khumhzi from Mizoram, with the latter making I. multicolor paraphyletic. Within the Indochinese + Sundaland species, I. catlocensis, an unstriped species from southern Vietnam, was suggested as a sister species to all the remaining taxa (98/1.0) (Fig. 5). These latter included a group consisting of two taxa from Peninsular Malaysia: an unstriped species I. larutensis Taylor, 1960, and its undescribed sister species Ichthyophis sp. C (100/1.0). Two striped species, I. hypocyaneus (van Hasselt, 1827) from Java and I. elongatus Taylor, 1965 from Sumatra, formed a well-supported clade with three striped species from the Thai-Malay Peninsula: I. supachaii and two unnamed species, Ichthyophis sp. D from Tanintharyi in Myanmar and Ichthyophis sp. E from southern Thailand (100/1.0). Ichthyophis nguyenorum, a striped species from central Vietnam, formed a well-supported clade with I. cardamomensis, an unstriped species from southern Cambodia (100/0.99). Finally, the I. kohtaoensis complex grouped two striped species from mainland Indochina: I. kohtaoensis (including its junior synonym I. bannanicus) and an unnamed species, Ichthyophis sp. E from Vietnam (98/1.0).

Pairwise distances. The uncorrected p distances for the cyt b gene and the 16S rRNA mtDNA fragment among the members of the genus Ichthyophis are summarized in Table S4. The interspecific distances among Ichthyophis species in the cyt b sequences varied from p = 5.3% (between I. supachaii and I. hypocyaneus) to p = 19.8% (between I. elongatus and I. cf. asplenius, and I. elongatus and I. pauli), while in the 16S rRNA sequences, p distances varied from p = 1.5% (between I. supachaii and I. hypocyaneus) to p = 9.9% (between I. orthoplicatus and Ichthyophis sp. A). The genetic divergence of the newly discovered population of Ichthyophis sp. from northern Vietnam in cyt b gene sequences varied from p = 6.5% (with I. yangi) to p = 14.6% (with Ichthyophis sp. E), while in the 16S rRNA gene sequences p distances varied from p = 4.5% (with I. chaloensis) to p = 7.6% (with I. khumhzi, Ichthyophis sp. D, Ichthyophis sp. E). Inter-group genetic differentiation between the two samples of Ichthyophis sp. from northern Vietnam was small and comprised p = 0.9% (for the 16S rRNA gene fragment); the two samples of Ichthyophis sp. shared the same cyt b haplotype.

Systematics

Our molecular phylogenetic analyses strongly suggested that the newly discovered caecilian populations from Xuan Lien NP and Pu Hoat NR in northern Vietnam belong to the genus Ichthyophis, within which they formed, among the sampled species, a distinct species-level lineage, which was closely related to two recently discovered unstriped species: I. yangi from Yunnan Province, China, and I. chaloensis from central Vietnam (Fig. 5). Genetic divergence of Ichthyophis sp. from northern Vietnam from its putative sister species was not especially high (6.5–6.9% in the cyt b gene and 4.5% in the 16S rRNA gene) but generally corresponded to the species-level divergence in these genes reported for many recognized species of this genus (for example, I. supachaii and I. hypocyaneus, or I. mindanaoensis and I. cf. asplenius; see Table S4).

Overall, based on the external morphology and geographic proximity of their distributions, the unstriped species I. chaloensis, I. yangi, and Ichthyophis sp. from northern Vietnam appeared to be most closely related to the enigmatic species I. laosensis, described from central Laos and to date reliably known only from the holotype MNHN 1928.95. Geissler et al. (2015) revised the unstriped species of Ichthyophis from Indochina and, along with descriptions of three new species, provided a redescription of available type materials for I. laosensis, I. acuminatus, and I. youngorum. Though the absence of the recently collected materials and molecular data for I. laosensis hampers the interpretation of our phylogenetic results, in the case of significant morphological differences, the taxonomic recognition of morphologically distinct populations as species seems to be reasonable.

Morphological examination of the two specimens of Ichthyophis sp. from northern Vietnam indicated the presence of several diagnostically important traits related both to body proportions and to meristic characters, including the number of annuli, teeth, and vertebrae, which allowed distinguishing this population from all other unstriped species of Ichthyophis in mainland Southeast Asia, as well as from all other congeners (summarized in Table 1). As a basis for further taxonomic research on Southeast Asian Ichthyophiidae, we also provided a detailed description of osteological traits of this population, including a detailed morphological description of skull bones and the atlas. Overall, our results supported the hypothesis that the recently discovered population of Ichthyophis sp. from northern Vietnam represents an undescribed species, which we formally describe below.

Table 1 – part 1.

Comparison of morphological characters of Ichthyophis griseivermis sp. nov. with other unstriped species of the genus Ichthyophis from Indochina and China. Diagnostic differences from the new species are marked in bold. Morphological data from larval specimens were not used in comparisons with the new species type series. For character abbreviations see Materials and methods. Type status abbreviations: H – holotype; P – paratype. Morphological data are taken from Taylor (1960), Geissler et al. (2015), Rao et al. (2024), and the present study.

Species Ichthyophis griseivermis sp. nov. I. yangi I. catlocensis I. chaloensis I. laosensis
Museum IDs ZMMU
A-8208
VRTC
NAP-08953
KIZ 2024R1448 KIZ
2023048
KIZ 2024R1445 ZFMK
88976
IEBR A.2011.16 MNHN 1928.95
Type status H P H P P H P H
Sex F M F F F F F F
Morphometry (in mm)
TL 206.0 242.0 321.4 307.4 329.5 183.5 215.7 318.0
TAL 2.4 3.6 2.9 3.0 3.9 2.1 3.7 3.7
BW1 6.6 6.9 10.6 10.5 8.0 5.3 6.9 11.4
BW2 9.8 11.2 13.9 13.8 10.5 7.1 7.6 16.1
BW3 4.9 5.0 5.8 5.7 4.2 3.7 3.2 6.3
HL 8.8 9.8 14.6 15.4 17.0 7.3 9.4 10.9
HW 6.1 6.9 8.7 8.1 9.5 4.8 6.3 9.7
UJL 6.5 8.0 10.8 9.6 10.5 5.4 7.2 10.8
LJL 6.2 7.5 10.3 9.2 10.1 5.2 6.3 10.3
SP 0.6 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.7 0.5 1.3 0.6
EL 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.7 1.0 0.6 0.8 1.7
ES 4.0 4.7 5.7 5.5 5.6 3.6 4.8 6.3
EE 4.6 5.8 5.9 5.1 6.6 4.3 4.8 7.3
NN 1.8 2.2 2.0 1.7 2.6 2.0 1.8 3.2
TT 4.2 4.9 6.1 5.5 5.4 4.2 4.7 7.5
EN 2.8 3.7 4.2 4.3 5.4 2.9 3.6 5.0
ET 1.1 1.5 1.2 1.1 1.2 0.6 1.3 1.6
TN 2.4 3.1 1.3 1.3 1.3 2.7 2.8 4.3
ED 0.6 0.7 1.0 1.1 1.2 0.5 0.3 1.0
ETH 0.7 0.9
C1 2.2 2.8
C2 2.4 3.0
STTA 3.6 4.5
LTA 0.6 0.7
CD 1.5 3.0
Measurement ratios
TN/ET 2.2 2.1 1.1 1.1 1.1 4.5 2.2 2.7
HL/ED 15.5 14.5 15.2 13.8 14.2 14.6 31.3 10.9
SP/HL 0.06 0.08 0.05 0.04 0.04 0.07 0.14 0.06
TL/TAL 85.5 66.7 110.8 103.9 83.6 87.4 58.3 85.9
TL/BW2 21.1 21.6 23.2 22.4 31.4 25.8 28.4 19.8
ES/HL 0.46 0.48 0.39 0.36 0.33 0.49 0.51 0.58
EL/HL 0.08 0.08 0.05 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.09 0.16
Meristic characters
TAD 306 301 369 372 372 342 344 346
TAV 298 292 367 369 368 340 342 345
AV 4 4 6 6 6 5 3 3
TAT 1 1 2 2 2 5 5 2
PMM 44 48 51 53 44 37 33
VP 43 48 44 44 51 54 36
DE 38 38 48 49 27 26 35
IM 25 33 36 35 16 11 30
VERT 112 111 114 114 110 110 112
TG 0 0
Species I. youngorum I. acuminatus I. cardamomensis
Museum IDs FMNH 189250 FMNH 189251 FMNH 189252 FMNH 189253 AMNH A20875 NHMUK 1921.4.1.338 NHMUK 1961.2055 NHMUK 1961.2056 NHMUK 1961.2057 LSUHC 9335 CBC 01185 LSUHC 10106
Type status H P P P H P P P P H P P
Sex M M – (larva) F (larva) M F F F – (larva) F F F
Morphometry (in mm)
TL 208.0 217.0 82.0 189.0 294.0 199.0 203.0 215.0 172.0 183.0 321.7 289.1
TAL 2.9 3.1 1.8 3.5 3.9 2.8 2.4 3.6 2.0 3.1 3.8 6.0
BW1 8.1 8.0 7.8 10.6 7.8 6.4 8.1 6.7 7.1 9.2 8.9
BW2 11.2 10.5 4.8 10.6 13.7 10.9 8.1 10.6 8.0 7.9 8.6 8.0
BW3 5.5 5.0 2.5 5.3 5.4 4.3 3.6 5.9 3.9 4.1 5.4 4.9
HL 10.4 10.4 9.3 14.6 8.8 9.1 10.1 8.8 8.1 11.7 9.2
HW 7.6 7.3 3.9 7.0 9.8 6.7 6.2 7.0 6.3 5.8 7.9 7.1
UJL 7.6 7.3 2.8 4.5 10.6 6.4 6.2 6.2 5.9 6.9 10.2 9.5
LJL 6.7 6.9 2.2 4.5 9.3 6.0 5.6 5.6 5.9 6.0 9.7 9.0
SP 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.7 0.8 0.4 0.1 0.3 0.4 0.7 0.5 0.6
EL 1.0 1.0
ES 5.8* 4.1 6.0 5.5
EE 4.5 4.8 2.4 4.2 6 4.3 4 4.6 4.3 4.3 5.6 5.2
NN 2.4 2.2 1.4 1.7 2.6 1.3 1.1 1.4 1.3 2.2 2.8 2.6
TT 5.9 4.9 7.2 5.0 4.6 5.5 5.0 4.7 6.2 5.8
EN 3.8 3.6 1.7 2.8 4.8 3.1 3.2 3.2 3.1 3.5 4.7 4.2
ET 1.1 1.0 1.3 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.9 1.2 1.1
TN 2.7 2.5 3.1 2.0 2.0 2.1 2.5 2.9 3.5 3.1
ED 0.7* 0.7 1.0 0.8
ETH
C1
C2
STTA
LTA
CD
Measurement ratios
TN/ET 2.5 2.5 2.4 2.9 2.5 2.6 3.1 3.2 2.9 2.8
HL/ED 20.9 11.6 13.2 11.5
SP/HL 0.01 0.01 0.08 0.05 0.05 0.01 0.03 0.05 0.09 0.04 0.06
TL/TAL 71.7 70 45.6 54.0 43.0 71.1 84.6 59.7 86 59 84.7 48.1
TL/BW2 18.6 20.7 17.1 17.8 21.5 18.3 25.1 25.1 21.5 23.2 37.4 36.1
ES/HL 0.40 0.51 0.51 0.60
EL/HL 0.12 0.09
Meristic characters
TAD 318 328 317 302 296 301 327 322 364 340
TAV 320 359 338
AV 5 6 6 6 7 5 6 3 5 4 5
TAT 4 4 4 3 2 3 2 3 6 4 6
PMM 28 22** 23** 40 43 37 41 35 23 38 38
VP 33** 40 33** 46 39 38 43 37 29 28 28
DE 28** 29** 28** 42 43 38 42 31 20 34 34
IM 19** 18** 15** 32 26 26 26 19 19 21 22
VERT 108 108 104 108 109 108 111 111 120 120
TG
* Based on Taylor (1960, 1968); ** Damaged, no exact count possible.

Family Ichthyophiidae Taylor, 1968

Genus Ichthyophis Fitzinger, 1826

Ichthyophis griseivermis sp. nov.

Table 1; Figures 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, S1–S16

Holotype.

ZMMU A-8208 (field tag NAP-15224), an adult female, from Xuan Lien National Park, Bat Mot Commune, Thanh Hoa Province, Vietnam (elevation 800 m a.s.l.; geographic coordinates: 19.985°N, 104.974°E), collected by A. P. Yuzefovich and A. M. Bragin from a bank of mountain stream on October 28, 2023.

Paratype.

VRTC NAP08953 (field tag NAP-08953), adult male, from Pu Hoat Nature Reserve, Tien Phong Commune, Nghe An Province, Vietnam (elevation 815 m a.s.l.; geographic coordinates: 19.755°N, 104.796°E), collected by N. A. Poyarkov from the bank of a river on May 15, 2019.

Etymology.

The specific name “griseivermis” is a Latin noun in the nominative singular, given in apposition, derived from the Latin adjective “griseus” for “grey” and the Latin noun “vermis” for “worm.” The new species is named in reference to its characteristic uniform grey body coloration. The specific epithet also alludes to Grey Worm, the commander of the Unsullied, the warrior-eunuchs of Astapor with an unparalleled reputation for combat in George R. R. Martin’s fictional work “A Song of Ice and Fire” (also known as “Game of Thrones”). We suggest the following common names for the new species: “Grey Worm Caecilian” (in English), “?ch giun xám B?c Trung B?” (in Vietnamese), and “Seryi rybozmey” (“????? ????????,” in Russian).

Diagnosis.

The new species Ichthyophis griseivermis sp. nov. differs from other members of the genus Ichthyophis by the following combination of the morphological characters: unstriped body lacking lateral yellow stripe; adult total length 206–242 mm (based on two available specimens); snout blunt and rounded (snout length/head length ratio 0.06–0.08); tentacle aperture located closer to eye than to naris (tentacle aperture-naris distance/tentacle aperture-eye distance ratio 2.1–2.2); premaxillary and maxillary teeth 44–48, vomero-palatine teeth 43–48, dentary teeth 38, inner mandibular teeth 25–33; tail very short, acuminate, ending in a nipple-like cap; annuli angulate, total 301–306 (dorsal count), four interupted by cloacal disc, one posterior to cloacal disc, the degree of annuli angulation decreasing from head to cloaca with grooves appearing almost orthoplicate at mid-body and posteriorly; vertebrae 111–112; scales in one series per annulus (dosolaterally), present only in the posterior half of body.

Description of the holotype.

Adult female (Figs 68), specimen in a good state of preservation (Fig. S15); a small oblique scar on the dorsal surface of body above the cloaca (Fig. 7E, G), small (< 15 mm) midventral longitudinal incision at midbody with some viscera protruding, including yellowish round mature ova (ca. 6 mm in diameter). Body subcylindrical; head, nuchal region, and trunk slightly dorsoventrally compressed. Body tapering posteriorly, more abruptly at about one-fifth of body length (Fig. 6C–D), ending in blunt tail tip, with a small nipple-like terminal cap (Fig. 7E–H). Tail downturned towards tip, very short (TL/TAL ratio 85.5), slightly longer than tentacle-snout distance (TAL/STTA ratio 0.68). Head longer than wide (HW/HL ratio 0.70); head dorsal surface slightly flattened (Fig. 7A–B). Head somewhat more like V- than U-shaped in dorsal view (Fig. 7C). In dorsal view, head width at the level of mouth corner notably smaller than the width of the first collar (HW/BW1 ratio 0.92); head narrowing towards the tentacles and gradually tapering from the tentacles to the snout (Fig. 7C). In lateral view, head conically tapering on the distance between the first collar and nares (Fig. 7A–B). Nares located much closer to the tip of the snout than to eye (ES/EN ratio 1.4; Fig. 4A–B). Lip margin flat and straight; corners of mouth notably closer to the throat than to top of head (Fig. 7A–B); mouth subterminal, with the upper and lower lips nearly identical in length (SP/UJL ratio 0.10; Fig. 7D); in ventral view, gular region flat (Fig. 7D). Eyes very small (ED/HL ratio 0.07), eye diameter slightly larger than that of naris and subequal to tentacle aperture; covered by grayish-white semitranslucent skin; eyes round, surrounded by narrow whitish ring, forming a dark-gray central disc, with a very small round pupil visible through the skin (Fig. 7A–B). In lateral view, eyes located almost equidistant from lip and top of head (EL/ETH 0.91) (Fig. 7A–B). Tentacle apertures located over two times closer to eye than to naris (EN/ET ratio 2.6; TN/ET ratio 2.2; Fig. 7A–B), almost reaching the edge of the upper lip; subequal in size to the eye (Fig. 7A–B). Tentacular papilli elevated above the adjacent skin and visible in dorsal, lateral, and ventral views (Fig. 7A–D). Naris small, oval with anterolateral orientation (Fig. 7A–B). Teeth small, notably recurved, almost hook-shaped, located in two rows on upper and lower jaws (PMM 44, VP 43, DE 38, IM 25); outer mandibular tooth series approximately the same length as vomero-palatine tooth series. Tongue triangular with an acuminate tip, plicate posteriorly, lacking a distinct longitudinal medial groove; choanae narrow. The first collar slightly wider than the head at the mouth corner level (HW/BW1 ratio 0.92); the second collar gradually widens posteriorly; collar grooves widely incomplete dorsally, more distinct on the ventral surface (Fig. 7D) and on the sides (Fig. 7A–B); medially, anterior and posterior borders of collar region not well discernable, edged by the anteriormost body annuli (Fig. 7C–D); transverse nuchal grooves on dorsal surface of collar absent; in ventral view, second collar slightly longer than first (C1/C2 ratio 0.91); the anteriormost annuli complete in both ventral and dorsal aspects (Fig. 6C–D); body grooves encircle venter by forming an angle pointing towards tail, with the degree of angulation decreasing from head to cloaca: grooves distinctly angulated in the anterior one-third of body length (Fig. 6D) and appear almost orthoplicate at mid-body and posteriorly, with only a small medial portion of groove (ca. 0.5 mm in length) forming a shallow angle (Fig. 6B). Total number of annuli TAD 306, TAV 298 (dorsal and ventral counts, respectively); vertebrae 112. Cloacal slit longitudinal, located in an oval cloacal disc, interrupting four annuli on both sides (Fig. 7H). Tail bearing two annular grooves delimiting a single annulus and terminating in a distinct nipple-like terminal cap (Fig. 7G–H); scales in one series per annulus (in dorsolateral view), present only in the posterior half of body; scales oval in shape.

Figure 6. 

The holotype of Ichthyophis griseivermis sp. nov. in life (ZMMU A-8208, adult female). A Dorsal view of annuli in the middle of the body; B ventral view of annuli in the middle of the body; C general dorsolateral view of the body, right side; D general ventrolateral view of the body, right side. Scale bar equals 5 mm. Photographs by A. M. Bragin.

Figure 7. 

Details of external morphology of the holotype of Ichthyophis griseivermis sp. nov. in life (ZMMU A-8208, adult female). A Lateral view of the head, right side; B lateral view of the head, right side; C dorsal view of the head; D ventral view of the head; E lateral view of the tail, left side; F lateral view of the tail, right side; G dorsal view of the tail; H ventral view of the tail. Scale bar equals 5 mm (all photographs shown in one scale). Photographs by A. M. Bragin.

Figure 8. 

The holotype of Ichthyophis griseivermis sp. nov. in life in situ (ZMMU A-8208, adult female). Photograph by A. M. Bragin.

Coloration.

In life (Figs 68), body uniformly grey-brown; somewhat lighter on venter; with a slight pinkish-purple tint on lower flanks and belly (Fig. 8); annular grooves dark-grey, annuli greyish; margins of nares, lips, nares and tentacles whitish-beige; eyes dark-blue with a narrow whitish circle around. After 15 months in preservative (Fig. S15), dark grey on dorsum and somewhat lighter ventrally; cloacal disc white; tail cap white; eyes, tentancles, and nares encircled by a narrow white margin.

Variation.

Variation in measurements and meristic characters of the type series is presented in Table 1. The paratype (VRTC NAP08953, adult male) was found as a desiccated specimen and is in a moderate condition of preservation (Fig. S16). Paratype body significantly dorsoventrally flattened; a large transverse incision present in the posterior one-third of the specimen length on the ventral side. The copulatory organ was extruded from the cloaca and damaged prior to specimen collection; the remains of the everted organ are visible on the ventral and lateral aspects of the specimen (Fig. S16A, B), but do not allow us to provide a description of its morphology. Overall, the male paratype VRTC NAP08953 is generally very similar in most morphological traits to the holotype; however, it is c. 17% longer than the holotypeis (TL 242 mm), and has a slightly lower number of annuli (TAD 301, TAV 292), one less vertebra (VERT 111), and a greater number of teeth in all tooth series (PMM 48; VP 48; DE 38; IM 33) all within the range of intraspecific variation expected for an Ichthyophis. It is identical to the holotype in in the number of annuli interrupted by the cloacal disc (AV 4) and the number of annuli posterior to the cloacal disc (TAT 1); and similar in body proportions. Due to desiccation and storage in ethanol for over five years, the original dark coloration of the paratype has significantly faded; the specimen is uniformly brown; the head and ventral surfaces are light-brown (Fig. S16).

Comparisons (external morphology).

The new species lacks light lateral stripes, so it can be easily distinguished from all striped members of the genus Ichthyophis, and its comparisons with the unstriped congeners are the most pertinent. We will first compare Ichthyophis griseivermis sp. nov. with seven currently recognized unstriped species of the genus Ichthyophis from the Indochinese region (including Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, and Thailand) and China; the main diagnostic characters separating the new species from these species are summarized in Table 1.

Ichthyophis griseivermis sp. nov. is a comparatively small-sized species (TL 206.0–242.0 mm): though only two specimens of the new species are known to date and it is impossible to be confident about its maximal body size, the presence of mature ova in the holotype at least indicates that this specimen is adult at the TL of 206.0 mm. This can arguably distinguish the new species from its sister species I. yangi (endemic to Yunnan Province, China) (TL 307.4–329.5 mm) and, with less confidence, from I. laosensis (known only from northern Laos) (TL of the only known holotype 318.0 mm).

In body proportions, by the relatively longer eye-snout distance (ES/HL ratio 0.46–0.48), the new species can be further distinguished from I. yangi, in which the snout is much shorter (ES/HL ratio 0.33–0.39), and, though with less confidence, from I. acuminatus (distributed in northwestern Thailand and northwestern Laos) (ES/HL ratio 0.40; however, this comparison should be taken with caution as its calculation is based on the ES measurement by Taylor 1960). At the same time, I. laosensis and, arguably, I. cardamomensis (endemic to the Cardamom Mountains, southwestern Cambodia) have a comparatively longer snout than the new species (ES/HL ratios 0.58 and 0.51–0.60, respectively). Ichthyophis griseivermis sp. nov. has the tentacle aperture being situated comparatively farther from the eye (TN/ET ratio 2.1–2.2) than in most other unstriped Indochinese Ichthyophis, including I. acuminatus (TN/ET ratio 2.4–2.9), I. cardamomensis (TN/ET ratio 2.8–3.2), I. catlocensis (endemic to Lam Dong Province of southern Vietnam) (TN/ET ratio 4.5), I. laosensis (TN/ET ratio 2.7), and I. youngorum (endemic to northwestern Thailand) (TN/ET ratio 2.5). At the same time, in the new species, the tentacle aperture is situated comparatively closer to the eye than in I. yangi, where it is located almost in between the nostril and the eye (TN/ET ratio: 1.1). Relative eye size is larger in the new species (HL/ED ratio 14.5–15.5) than in I. chaloensis (endemic to Quang Binh Province, central Vietnam) (HL/ED ratio 31.3) and, arguably, in I. acuminatus (HL/ED ratio 20.9; however, this comparison should be taken with caution as its calculation is based on the ED measurement by Taylor 1960), but is smaller than in I. laosensis (HL/ED ratio 10.9) and generally smaller than in I. cardamomensis (HL/ED ratio 11.5–13.2). Ichthyophis griseivermis sp. nov. has a relatively shorter distance between eye and lip (EL/HL ratio 0.08) than in I. laosensis (EL/HL ratio 0.16), but this distance is greater than in I. yangi (EL/HL ratio 0.04–0.06). The new species has a relatively more projecting snout (SP/HL ratio 0.06–0.08) than I. acuminatus (SP/HL ratio 0.01–0.05) and I. youngorum (SP/HL ratio 0.01), and a slightly more projecting snout than I. yangi (SP/HL ratio 0.04–0.05), but a shorter snout projection than I. chaloensis (SP/HL ratio 0.14). The new species has a comparatively shorter tail (TL/TAL ratio 66.7–85.5) than I. chaloensis (TL/TAL ratio 58.3). Ichthyophis griseivermis sp. nov. has a comparatively wider body (TL/BW2 ratio 21.1–21.6) than I. cardamomensis (TL/BW2 ratio 23.2–37.4), I. catlocensis (TL/BW2 ratio 25.8), and I. chaloensis (TL/BW2 ratio 28.4); though this character should be taken cautiously, as a significant variation in body width has been reported earlier for a larger sample size of I. glutinosus (Nussbaum and Gans 1980).

Differences between the new species and its congeners observed in meristic characters should be taken with caution due to a small sample size available for our examination. Nevertheless, I. griseivermis sp. nov. has notably fewer total annuli both in dorsal count (TAD 301–306) and in ventral count (TAV 292–298) than I. catlocensis (TAD 342; TAV 340), I. chaloensis (TAD 344; TAV 342), I. laosensis (TAD 346; TAV 345), I. cardamomensis (TAD 322–364; TAV 320–359), and I. yangi (TAD 369–372; TAV 367–369). The new species has generally fewer annuli interrupted by the cloacal disc (AV 4) than in I. acuminatus (AV 5–7), I. youngorum (AV 5–7), and I. yangi (AV 6), slightly fewer annuli interrupted by the cloacal disc than I. catlocensis (AV 5), and slightly more than I. chaloensis (AV 3) and I. laosensis (AV 3). By having only a single annulus posterior to the cloacal disc (TAT 1), the new species is distinguished from I. acuminatus (TAT 2–3), I. cardamomensis (TAT 2–6), I. catlocensis (TAT 5), I. chaloensis (TAT 5), and I. youngorum (TAT 4). The new species has a slightly higher number of labial premaxillary-maxillary teeth (PMM 44–48) than I. acuminatus (PMM 37–43), I. cardamomensis (PMM 23–38), I. chaloensis (PMM 37), I. laosensis (PMM 33), and I. youngorum (PMM 22–28), but fewer premaxillary-maxillary teeth than in I. yangi (PMM 51–53). Ichthyophis griseivermis sp. nov. has slightly fewer vomero-palatine teeth (VP 43–48) than I. catlocensis (VP 51) and I. chaloensis (VP 54), but more than in I. laosensis (VP 36), I. cardamomensis (VP 28–29), and I. youngorum (VP 33–40; note that the lower value was obtained from a partially damaged specimen and may be erroneous). The new species has more dentary (labial) teeth (DE 38) than I. catlocensis (DE 27), I. chaloensis (DE 26), and I. youngorum (DE 28–29; note that these values were obtained from partially damaged specimens and may be erroneous), but fewer than I. yangi (DE 48–49). At the same time, the new species has more inner mandibular teeth (IM 25–33) than I. catlocensis (16), I. chaloensis (IM 11), I. youngorum (IM 18–19; note that these values were obtained from partially damaged specimens and may be erroneous), and I. cardamomensis (IM 19–22). Ichthyophis griseivermis sp. nov. further differs from I. cardamomensis by fewer vertebrae (VERT 111–112 vs. 120).

Furthermore, I. griseivermis sp. nov. can be readily diagnosed from the following unstriped species of Ichthyophis which occur outside the Indochinese Region and southern China. In particular, the new species differs from I. lakimi (Sabah, Borneo) by having more premaxillary-maxillary (labial) teeth (PMM 44–48 vs. 16–25) and by having more inner mandibular teeth (IM 25–33 vs. 14) (though the tooth counts for I. lakimi reported by Nishikawa et al. 2012 appear to be much lower than are typically known for Ichthyophis and require a re-examination); from I. billitonensis Taylor, 1965 (Belitung Is., Indonesia) by having more inner mandibular teeth (IM 25–33 vs. 2); and by having more annuli in dorsal count (TAD 301–306 vs. 251–254); from I. dulitensis Taylor, 1960 (Sarawak, Borneo) by the absence of scales in the anterior half of body (vs. present); by having more inner mandibular teeth (IM 25–33 vs. 8); and by the absence of a light marking on the throat (vs. present); from I. glandulosus Taylor, 1923 (Basilan Is., Philippines) by having more annuli in dorsal count (TAD 301–306 vs. 273–286); and by a higher number of vertebrae (VERT 111–112 vs. 102); from I. javanicus Taylor, 1960 (Java Is., Indonesia) by having less annuli both in dorsal count (TAD 301–306 vs. 351), and in ventral count (TAV 292–298 vs. 348); and fewer annuli posterior to the cloacal disc (TAT 1 vs. 10); from I. larutensis (Peninsular Malaysia) by the presence of inner mandibular teeth (vs. absent); and by a slightly higher number of vertebrae (VERT 111–112 vs. 107); from I. mindanaoensis (Mindanao Is., Philippines) by having more inner mandibular teeth (IM 25–33 vs. 16–22); from I. monochrous (Bleeker, 1858) (Borneo Is., Indonesia) by having more annuli in dorsal count (TAD 301–306 vs. 247); by having more inner mandibular teeth (IM 25–33 vs. 8); and by a greater number of vertebrae (VERT 111–112 vs. 103); from I. orthoplicatus (Sri Lanka) by having fewer annuli posterior to the cloacal disc (TAT 1 vs. 7); and by having slightly more inner mandibular teeth (IM 25–33 vs. 18–20); from I. sikkimensis Taylor, 1960 (northeastern India) by having more annuli in dorsal count (TAD 301–306 vs. 276–292); by a greater number of vertebrae (VERT 111–112 vs. 106–108); and by having slightly more inner mandibular teeth (IM 25–33 vs. 18–20); from I. singaporensis Taylor, 1960 (Singapore) by the absence of scales on the anterior half of body (vs. present); by having more annuli in dorsal count (TAD 301–306 vs. 260–273); by having fewer annuli posterior to the cloacal disc (TAT 1 vs. 7); and by having more inner mandibular teeth (IM 25–33 vs. 6–10); from I. sumatranus Taylor, 1960 (Sumatra Is., Indonesia) by the absence of scales on the anterior half of body (vs. present); and by having fewer annuli posterior to the cloacal disc (TAT 1 vs. 7); from I. weberi Taylor, 1920 (Palawan Is., Philippines) by the presence of inner mandibular teeth (vs. absent); and by having fewer both in dorsal count (TAD 301–306 vs. 313–329), and in ventral count (TAV 292–298 vs. 304–322).

Comparisons (cranial features).

Overall, the holotype specimen of I. griseivermis sp. nov. (ZMMU A-8208; for detailed osteological description see above) is characterized by the following combination of cranial and dental characteristics: cranium more like V-shaped in the dorsal view; circumorbital present as a small bone, crescent-shaped and widely open ventrally; circumorbital and frontal not in contact; tentacular canal is open laterally and confluent with the orbital aperture; frontals in contact one another along about one-third of their lengths (i.e., short midline contact of frontals following Wilkinson et al. 2014); the posterior edge of vomer is situated slightly anteriorly to the center of the palate (at about 44–45% of the cranium length); ventral edge of the posterior process of pterygoid is situated barely below the level of premaxillary-maxillary teeth; the anterior part of the parasphenoid portion of os basale is wide; occipital condyles are widely spaced in ventral view; retroarticular process of pseudoangular elongated, with its rounded posterior end oriented nearly dorsally; and teeth are moderately sized, with gently posteriorly curved tips.

Below, we compare the cranial features of I. griseivermis sp. nov. with the few congeners for which skull morphology reconstructions are available via MorphoSource or from previous publications: I. asplenius, I. kohtaoensis, I. tricolor, I. multicolor, I. nguyenorum, and I. supachaii (based on Wilkinson et al. 2014; McGrath-Blaser et al. 2025 and our data, see the Data Availability Statement below). Comparisons with I. sikkimensis are limited because only the dorsal aspect of the skull has been shown for this species (Gower et al. 2017: fig. 2A). Additionally, we examined skull descriptions and illustrations of I. beddomei, I. glutinosus, I. larutensis, I. mindanaoensis, I. nigroflavus, I. singaporensis, and I. weberi presented in Taylor (1969: figs 2–11). Table S5 summarizes the comparative morphological data on skull morphology for the new species and 14 other members of the genus Ichthyophis.

The new species differs from all other Ichthyophis species examined in having a small, crescent-shaped circumorbital, lacking the ventral portion, and bordering only the upper posterior corner of the orbital aperture (vs. a larger circumorbital with a posterior ventral process). The smooth, gradually tapering retroarticular process with its posterior end oriented dorsally is also a characteristic feature of the new species. Additionally, the new species differs from I. asplenius, I. beddomei, I. glutinosus, I. kohtaoensis, I. larutensis, I. mindanaoensis, I. multicolor, I. nguyenorum, I. nigroflavus, I. singaporensis, I. supachaii, I. tricolor, and I. weberi, but resembles I. sikkimensis in having a weakly zygokrotaphic skull (vs. the stegokrotaphic or weakly stegokrotaphic condition of the skull). Furthermore, the new species differs from I. asplenius, I. kohtaoensis, I. tricolor, I. multicolor, I. nguyenorum, and I. supachaii in lacking the stapedial foramen (vs. present in all these species; for other species the structure of the stapes has not been described or illustrated).

Additionally, I. griseivermis sp. nov. further differs from I. kohtaoensis in having a more like V-shaped cranium in the dorsal view (vs. more like U-shaped), in having the posterior edge of the vomer situated slightly anteriorly to the center of the palate, about 44–45% of the cranium length (vs. the vomer is situated around the center of the palate, about 50% of the cranium length), and by the laterally expanded foramen magnum with widely spaced occipital condyles (vs. dorsoventrally expanded foramen magnum with closely positioned condyles). The new species further differs from I. tricolor in having a laterally open tentacular groove confluent with the orbital aperture (vs. a laterally closed tentacular groove not confluent with the orbital aperture), by having moderately sized teeth with gently posteriorly curved tips (vs. enlarged teeth with strongly curved tips), by the ventral edge of the posterior process of the pterygoid situated barely below the level of premaxillary-maxillary teeth (vs. far below the level of premaxillary-maxillary teeth), and by the absence of the contact between circumorbital and frontal (vs. present). The new species further differs from I. multicolor in having the posterior edge of the vomer situated slightly anteriorly to the center of the palate, about 44–45% of the cranium length (vs. vomer situated around the center of palate, about 50% of the cranium length), and in the absence of the contact between circumorbital and frontal (vs. present). The new species further differs from I. asplenius in having a more rounded tip of the snout (vs. more blunt), in more ventrally located nostrils in lateral view (vs. more dorsally), in having a laterally open tentacular canal confluent with the orbital aperture (vs. partly laterally closed tentacular canal not confluent with the orbital aperture), in rounded choanae (vs. subtriangular), and in the absence of the lateroventral process of the squamosal (vs. present). The new species further differs from I. nguyenorum in having widely spaced occipital condyles in ventral view (vs. almost confluent) and in a comparatively wider anterior part of the parasphenoid portion of os basale (vs. narrow). The new species further differs from I. supachaii in having widely spaced occipital condyles in ventral view (vs. almost confluent) and in having a laterally open tentacular groove confluent with the orbital aperture (vs. partly laterally closed tentacular groove not confluent with the orbital aperture). The new species differs from I. sikkimensis in having a longer contact between the frontal and prefrontal (vs. shorter, L-shaped contact). The new species further differs from I. beddomei in having a more like V-shaped cranium in the dorsal view (vs. more like U-shaped), in lacking the contact between frontal and circumrobital (vs. wide contact), in having oblique and narrow posterior edge of prefrontal in dorsal view (vs. transverse), and in having long anterior process of pterygoid (vs. short).

Ichthyophis griseivermis sp. nov. further differs from I. glutinosus in having a more like V-shaped cranium in the dorsal view (vs. more like U-shaped), in having rounded snout tip in dorsal aspect (vs. blunt), in having a laterally open tentacular groove confluent with the orbital aperture (vs. a laterally closed tentacular canal), in having palatine tooth series terminating at the level of the anterior border of the adductor chamber (vs. extends behind the level of the anterior border of the adductor chamber), in having widely spaced occipital condyles in ventral view (vs. closely positioned), in having shorter midline contact between frontals (vs. longer), and in having oblique and narrow posterior edge of prefrontal in dorsal view (vs. rounded). The new species further differs from I. larutensis in having rounded snout tip in dorsal aspect (vs. blunt), in having a laterally open tentacular groove confluent with the orbital aperture (vs. a laterally closed tentacular canal), in having palatine tooth series terminating at the level of the anterior border of the adductor chamber (vs. terminates anterior to the adductor chamber), in having widely spaced occipital condyles in ventral view (vs. closely positioned), in having shorter midline contact between frontals (vs. longer), and in having long anterior process of pterygoid (vs. short), and in a comparatively wider anterior part of the parasphenoid portion of os basale (vs. narrow tapering). The new species further differs from I. mindanaoensis in having a more like V-shaped cranium in the dorsal view (vs. more like U-shaped), in having rounded choanae in ventral view (vs. distinctly triangular), in having a laterally open tentacular groove confluent with the orbital aperture (vs. a laterally closed tentacular canal), in having shorter midline contact between frontals (vs. longer), and in a comparatively wider anterior part of the parasphenoid portion of os basale (vs. narrow tapering). The new species further differs from I. nigroflavus in having a more like V-shaped cranium in the dorsal view (vs. more like U-shaped), in having rounded choanae in ventral view (vs. anteroposteriorly elongated, oval), in having widely spaced occipital condyles in ventral view (vs. in contact), in having long anterior process of pterygoid (vs. short), and in a comparatively wider anterior part of the parasphenoid portion of os basale (vs. narrow tapering).

Ichthyophis griseivermis sp. nov. further differs from I. singaporensis in having a more like V-shaped cranium in the dorsal view (vs. more like U-shaped), in having rounded snout tip in dorsal aspect (vs. blunt), in having rounded choanae in ventral view (vs. subtriangular), in having a laterally open tentacular groove confluent with the orbital aperture (vs. a laterally closed tentacular canal), in having palatine tooth series terminating at the level of the anterior border of the adductor chamber (vs. extends behind the level of the anterior border of the adductor chamber), in having widely spaced occipital condyles in ventral view (vs. in contact), and in a comparatively wider anterior part of the parasphenoid portion of os basale (vs. narrow tapering). The new species further differs from I. weberi in having a more like V-shaped cranium in the dorsal view (vs. more like U-shaped), and in having long anterior process of pterygoid (vs. short).

Finally, a scan of the skull of the I. laosensis specimen from Laos (NCSM 86611) is currently available on ­MorphoSource (https://www.morphosource.org/concern/media/000059682); however, unfortunately, the comparison of the new species with this cranial reconstruction appears impossible, since it is likely that the specimen NCSM 86611 is a sub-adult individual with some of the skull elements unossified or not in the definitive condition.

Distribution and natural history notes.

Currently, I. griseivermis sp. nov. is known from two protected areas in northern Vietnam: from Xuan Lien NP in Thanh Hoa Province and Pu Hoat NR in Nghe An Province (Fig. 1). Though at present the new species can be considered as endemic to a narrow montane area in the western parts of Thanh Hoa and Nghe An provinces of Vietnam, its occurrence in the adjacent parts of Houaphanh Province of Laos is anticipated; both known localities are located just 3–5 km from the Vietnam-Laos national border. The possible occurrence of the new species in Ben En NP in Thanh Hoa Province and Pu Huong NR in Nghe An Province also cannot be excluded, and further field survey efforts are needed to clarify the extent of its distribution.

The type locality is at an elevation of 800 m asl. The holotype was found on the bank of a small forest stream with a stony bottom and steep clay bank (Fig. S17). The surrounding secondary montane evergreen forest is severely damaged by regular logging, but some old trees remain, including Cunninghamia konishii Hayata (Cupressaceae), forming mixed polydominant forests with Symingtonia populnea (R. Br. ex Griff.) (Hamamelidaceae), Carallia suffruticosa Ridl. (Rhizophoraceae), Engelhardtia roxburghiana Wall (Juglandaceae), Guarea excelsa Kunth (Meliaceae), Castanopsis ferox (Rosb.) (Fagaceae), Michelia mediocris Dandy (Magnoliaceae), Pellionia radicans var. grande (Gagnep.) H. Schroter (Urticaceae), Ardisia quinquegona Blume (Primulaceae), Litsea acutivena Hayata and Litsea yunnanensis Y. C. Yang & P. H. Huang (Lauraceae), and Alniphyllum fortunei (Hemsley) Makino (Styracaceae). The undergrowth is well developed; soil is densely covered with grasses, sedges, and fern thickets. The holotype was found in a small ravine at the foothill of a low mountain range composed of clays and shales with a limestone base. The holotype was found at night (ca. 23:00 h) while slowly crawling among the stones on the banks of a small mountain stream during a rain with an ambient air temperature around 19°C. The holotype was observed crawling along the unflooded part of the bank covered with silt and large pebbles about 30 cm from the water’s edge. The paratype male was found in the daytime (10:00 h) as a dead, desiccated specimen on a sandy bank of a river among large stones at an elevation of ca. 815 m asl. The two localities are separated by a direct distance of 31 km.

Though we don’t have direct observations on the new species reproductive biology, we can assume that, like the other members of the genus Ichthyophis, I. griseivermis sp. nov. is oviparous with aquatic larvae, which is also supported by the large size of the eggs in the new species. Like all caecilians, the new species is carnivorous; however, we do not have specific information about its diet. Other species of amphibians recorded at the same habitat in the Xuan Lien NP and in Pu Hoat NR included: Boulenophrys palpebralespinosa (Bourret, 1937), Leptobrachella eos (Ohler et al., 2011), Ophryophryne pachyproctus Kou, 1985, Xenophrys lancangica Lyu, Wang & Wang, 2023 (Megophryidae); Polypedates megacephalus Hallowell, 1861 (Rhacophoridae); Amolops tanfuilianae Sheridan et al., 2023, Hylarana cubitalis (Smith, 1917), Odorrana cf. chloronota (Günther, 1876) (Ranidae); Quasipaa ohlerae Pham et al., 2025, Limnonectes bannaensis Ye et al., 2007, Fejervarya limnocharis (Gravenhorst, 1829) (Dicroglossidae); and Tylototriton thaiorum Poyarkov, Nguyen & Arkhipov, 2021 (Salamandridae).

Conservation status.

At the present moment, the habitat of the new species at the type locality in Xuan Lien NP is subject to serious anthropogenic pressure. The lowland areas at the foot of the ridges and hills are subjected to overgrazing of cattle, buffalos, and pigs, which destroy the leaf litter and upper layers of soil; pigs also dig up the banks of rivers and streams. In the forested areas along the rivers and in the valleys between the ridges, small mammals, birds, reptiles, and amphibians are actively hunted by locals. Forests at the foot of the mountain are being cut down for firewood; the open territories are subsequently adapted for planting vegetables, establishing paddy fields, or pastures. Xuan Lien NP was established as a protected area in part to protect the last remaining groves of Fokienia hodginsii (Dunn) A. Henry & H. H. Thomas (Cupressaceae), also known as “Po Mu,” a precious species of timber because of its characteristic aroma and its exceptional density. Despite the protective measures to preserve F. hodginsii and tourist routes to the most impressive old trees, during our surveys we have repeatedly observed illegal logging and transportation of F. hodginsii wood by the local population. These observations suggest that nature conservation measures in the Xuan Lien NP should be strengthened.

Given the information provided above, we suggest that I. griseivermis sp. nov., as with the majority of nominal caecilian species (Gower and Wilkinson 2005), should be considered as Data Deficient (DD) following the IUCN’s Red List categories (IUCN Standards and Petitions Committee 2019) pending additional information on its distribution extent and population status.

Discussion

Updated matrilineal genealogy of the Ichthyophiidae

We presented the most complete matrilineal genealogy for the family Ichthyophiidae published to date, which includes four nominal species of the genus Uraeotyphlus and 26 nominal species of the genus Ichthyophis along with six potentially unnamed new species (see Fig. 5). Overall, our sampling comprised only around a half of the known species diversity of the family, which still remains largely unexplored. High cryptic species diversity in Ichthyophis is observed not only in Sundaland (Nishikawa et al. 2012a) but also in mainland Southeast Asia. Though the major deep branches in our matrilineal genealogy are not fully resolved, overall the phylogenetic pattern supports the “Out of India” biogeographic hypothesis for the family Ichthyophiidae (Gower et al. 2002; Wilkinson et al. 2002). In accordance with this hypothesis, the genus Uraeotyphlus (including the taxa until recently assigned to the genus Ichthyophis) is restricted to southern peninsular India, while the genus Ichthyophis consists of four major clades, three of which occur in the Indian Subcontinent (Clades A–C, see Fig. 5), and one (Clade D) inhabits Southeast Asia including Northeast India. Phylogenetic relationships between the clades A–D remain essentially unresolved, partially because some of the Indian species (e.g., I. moustakius, I. cf. garoensis, I. khumhzi) in our analysis are represented by only short sequences of the 16S rRNA gene fragment. Further gene and taxon sampling with the major focus on Indian Ichthyophis is required to achieve a better-resolved phylogenetic tree of Ichthyophiidae.

Our study confirms that Southeast Asia represents an important secondary center of the Ichthyophiidae diversification, and all Southeast Asian Ichthyophis are monophyletic and belong to a single Clade D (see Fig. 5). Overall, our analysis revealed three major subclades within the Southeast Clade of Ichthyophis with a pronounced geographic structuring: subclade D1 regroups unstriped Ichthyophis from the mainland Southeast Asia, subclade D2 joins species from Borneo and the Philippines, while subclade D3 includes the remaining species from the mainland Southeast Asia, Thai-Malay Peninsula, Java, Sumatra, Myanmar, and Northeast India. Previous studies (Wilkinson et al. 2014) suggested that I. multicolor from Myanmar is sister to all other Southeast Asian Ichthyophis taxa, which was cautiously interpreted as a possible trace of the west-to-east dispersal route preserved in the phylogenetic relationships of the group. Our results place I. multicolor and closely related taxa deeper in the Southeast Asian Ichthyophis radiation (as the lineage sister to all remaining species within the subclade D3), suggesting a more complex biogeographic history of ichthyophiids.

As in the previous phylogenetic studies of the Ichthyophiidae (Gower et al. 2002; Nishikawa et al. 2012a), we were able to document that the striped and unstriped species of Ichthyophis do not form monophyletic groups, and the shifts between these two coloration types have happened several times (at least seven times) independently during the evolution of the genus (Fig. 5). At the same time, the subclade D1, to which the newly discovered I. griseivermis sp. nov. belongs, includes only unstriped species from Indochina and southern China. Most likely, the existence of two distinct coloration types among different species of Ichthyophis is explained by differences in natural history and arises from heterochronic shifts in coloration development during the larval stage and the metamorphosis (e.g., Breckenridge and Jayasinghe 1979; Dünker et al. 2000; Geissler et al. 2015; A. Kupfer, pers. comm.). According to our observations, most unstriped species of Ichthyophis in Indochina were usually found near the streams, sometimes on the edge of the water (e.g., I. griseivermis sp. nov., I. chaloensis, I. catlocensis), while the striped species (e.g., I. kohtaoensis, I. nguyenorum, and I. supachaii) were often recorded crawling on land far from the water (but also can be observed near the streams during the breeding season). However, these anecdotal observations are not sufficient to provide a comprehensive explanation for the color polymorphism in Ichthyophis.

Our matrilineal genealogy of Ichthyophiidae highlighted some issues within the genus Ichthyophis, which may result from either incomplete taxonomy of the group or from misidentification(s) (Fig. 5). In particular, the two samples identified as I. moustakius (MZMU-2529) and I. cf. garoensis (MZMU-1847) were found to be almost identical molecularly (p = 0.3% in the 16S rRNA gene; see Table S4) (Lalremsanga et al. 2021a). Both species occur in Northeast India, and misidentification is quite possible; careful reexamination of these specimens, along with molecular analysis of the topotypic specimens of I. garoensis, is required to clarify this issue. Similarly, in our tree, the sample MZMU-1796 from Mizoram (India), identified by Lalremsanga et al. (2021b) as I. khumhzi (originally described from Manipur, India), is placed within the radiation of I. multicolor (originally described from Myanmar), rendering the latter paraphyletic. The divergence of these taxa in 16S rRNA gene sequences is also lower (p = 1.7%, see Table S4) than most species pairs. If the identification of MZMU-1796 is correct, it is likely that I. multicolor may represent a junior synonym of I. khumhzi; further detailed examination of I. khumhzi and I. multicolor specimens is required to clarify the taxonomic status of the latter species. Further molecular studies are required to clarify the phylogenetic position of I. khumhzi and its relationships with I. multicolor, as well as the status of two lineages of I. multicolor from Ayeyarwady and Bago regions of Myanmar. Our study further confirms I. benjii as a valid species sister to I. khumhzi + I. multicolor in agreement with the results of Lalremsanga et al. (2021a).

Our study further highlights that the taxonomy of Southeast Asian Ichthyophis is far from complete. In addition to the three putative unnamed species of Ichthyophis from Malaysia reported by Nishikawa et al. (2012a: Ichthyophis spp. A–C) and the unnamed species from Vietnam reported by Geissler et al. (2015: Ichthyophis sp. F), we provide additional data on the diversity of the I. supachaiiI. hypocyaneus complex (see Kupfer and Müller 2004). Ichthyophis supachaii from the Thai-Malay Peninsula and I. hypocyaneus from Java Is. are genetically very close with the minimal level of divergence (p = 1.5% in the 16S rRNA gene; p = 5.3% in the cyt b gene, see Table S4). Our study demonstrates that a specimen from Sumatra, identified as I. elongatus (GenBank accession number LC789041), is also a closely related taxon reconstructed as a sister species to I. supachaii (Fig. 5). Two other populations previously confused with and referred to as I. kohtaoensis belong to the same species group: a population from Koh Samui Is., Thailand (reported as I. cf. kohtaoensis by Nishikawa et al. 2012a), and a population from Tanintharyi, Myanmar (reported as I. cf. kohtaoensis by Mulcahy et al. 2018). After the taxonomy of I. kohtaoensis was recently clarified by Nishikawa et al. (2021), both the Ko Samui and Tanintharyi populations should be regarded as the members of the I. supachaiiI. hypocyaneus complex, and we herein tentatively indicate them as Ichthyophis sp. E and Ichthyophis sp. D, respectively.

Diversity of the Indochinese unstriped species of Ichthyophis

In our matrilineal genealogy, three unstriped taxa of Ichthyophis from Indochina and southern China formed a group of closely related species: Ichthyophis griseivermis sp. nov., I. chaloensis, and I. yangi (Subclade D1, Fig. 5). Compared to a more widely distributed striped species (such as I. kohtaoensis, for example), most of the unstriped species in the genus Ichthyophis are currently recorded from one or two sample sites and are characterized by very narrow distribution ranges (Fig. 1). This may be a result of a more secretive biology of the unstriped Ichthyophis species, which are often restricted to hilly or montane areas and, as we assume, are closely associated with forest streams. Such elusive biology and assumingly limited dispersal abilities suggest the possibility of the discovery of new, yet unrecorded, species diversity in the genus Ichthyophis. At the same time, further progress in the taxonomy of Ichthyophis in Indochina is hampered by the lack of genetic data on several unstriped species, namely I. laosensis, I. acuminatus, and I. youngorum. From the morphological data alone, it appears that all these species are very closely related to the members of Subclade D1. Moreover, I. laosensis was described from Laos, not far from the type locality of I. griseivermis sp. nov.

There is a certain confusion regarding the origin of the I. laosensis holotype. Geissler et al. (2015) noted that according to Taylor (1969b), the species was described from “Haute Laos” (“Upper Laos,” now Central Laos), which is not restrictable to a certain locality and which they formally marked on the map as Luang Prabang, as this city was the former French administrative center of “Haute Laos.” Recently, Stuart et al. (2024), referring to Annemarie Ohler, a curator of the MNHN collection where the holotype is housed, stated that the specimen was likely collected by Jean Théodore Delacour sometime during mid-November 1925 to 13 January 1926, likely in “Xieng-Khouang, au Tranninh, dans le nord du Laos (altitude 1200 à 2500 mèters)”; this suggestion is based in part on the collector’s travel account in Delacour (1933). Angel (1929) also recorded that J. T. Delacour and W. P. Lowe obtained three specimens of Ichthyophis (as I. glutinosus) in Xiangkhouang Province of central Laos. As the origin of I. laosensis remains unclear, further survey efforts in central and northern Laos and northern Thailand are required in order to obtain new samples of I. laosensis, I. acuminatus, and I. youngorum for molecular analysis. At the present moment, the validity of I. griseivermis sp. nov. as a distinct species is confirmed primarily by a number of taxonomically important morphological diagnostic characters, such as the body and head proportions and the number of annuli, vertebrae, and teeth.

According to the terrestrial ecoregion classification of Olson et al. (2001), the distribution of I. griseivermis sp. nov., which is likely restricted to the Pu Hoat Mountain Range, is located at the southernmost edge of the Northern Indochina subtropical forest ecoregion. This relatively small area is of biogeographic importance as it is located on the border between the Northern Annamites (Truong Son) and the Tay Bac mountains of northwestern Vietnam, including the Hoang Lien Son Mountain Range. The area is known as the line of faunal turnover, which is more precisely located along the valley of the Ca River in Nghe An Province (Bain and Hurley 2011; Poyarkov et al. 2021a, 2023). This valley has been shown to be an important biogeographic barrier for vascular plants (Averyanov et al. 2003), insectivorous mammals (Abramov and Tran 2017), amphibians (Bain and Hurley 2011, Poyarkov et al. 2021a), and reptiles (Poyarkov et al. 2023). Moreover, the Pu Hoat Mountain Range is characterized by a relatively high level of range-restricted amphibian endemism: at least three narrow-ranged amphibian species were recently described from this area, namely Gracixalus quangi Rowley, Dau, Nguyen, Cao & Nguyen (Rowley et al. 2011) (Rhacophoridae), Leptobrachella puhoatensis (Rowley, Dau & Cao) (Rowley et al. 2017) (Megophryidae), and Tylototriton thaiorum Poyarkov, Nguyen & Arkhipov (Poyarkov et al. 2021b) (Salamandridae). The discovery of I. griseivermis sp. nov. further underlines the insufficiently assessed herpetofaunal diversity of the Pu Hoat Mountain Range.

Vietnam is recognized as a major center of amphibian diversity in Indochina (see Nguyen et al. 2009; Poyarkov et al. 2021a, 2023). In the last five years, many amphibian species have been described, rediscovered, and recorded from this country (e.g., Nguyen et al. 2020, 2024a, 2024b; Poyarkov et al. 2020, 2021b, 2024; Trofimets et al. 2024; Gorin et al. 2024). Numerous taxonomic studies have been conducted on anurans and salamanders of Vietnam, but studies on caecilians have been very limited, likely reflecting the general pattern in other countries of Southeast Asia (Nishikawa et al. 2012b; Geissler et al. 2015). Caecilian’s basically secretive underground lifestyle has hampered scientific collection of these animals in sufficient numbers for taxonomic studies even in countries like Vietnam, where vigorous herpetological surveys have been conducted (Poyarkov et al. 2021a, 2023). Therefore, the caecilian fauna of Vietnam still should be considered insufficiently explored and essentially unknown.

In recent years, the growing number of field surveys has led to advancements in herpetofauna assessments of northern and central Vietnam, which resulted in a rapid increase in the number of recorded amphibian species (e.g., Nguyen et al. 2020; Poyarkov et al. 2021a, 2021b, 2023). Although the Xuan Lien NP and Pu Hoat NR have been relatively well surveyed for their herpetofauna (e.g., Nguyen et al. 2009; Nguyen et al. 2016; Pham et al. 2016), the discovery of a new Ichthyophis species is remarkable, emphasizing that herpetofaunal surveys in Vietnam need to take appropriate measures to assess such elusive groups of amphibians as caecilians, such as digging, establishing lines of pitfall traps, and surveying the leaf litter, soil, and rotten tree logs along and in the vicinity of forest streams. The discovery of I. griseivermis sp. nov. raises the total number of species of the genus Ichthyophis to 51, as well as increases the number of Ichthyophis species known from Vietnam to five, with four species currently considered endemic to this country, namely, I. catlocensis, I. chaloensis, I. nguyenorum, and I. griseivermis sp. nov. Despite the recent progress in molecular taxonomy (see Nishikawa et al. 2012a, 2021; Geissler et al. 2015), overall, the diversity of the ichthyophiid caecilians still remains incompletely studied. Therefore, we call for further efforts for field surveys and research on the taxonomy and distribution of the genus Ichthyophis in Southeast Asia.

Comparative osteology of the Ichthyophiidae

The scarcity of materials in the herpetological collections and the small number of informative external morphological features represent some of the most important challenges in caecilian taxonomy. The novel non-destructive micro-CT scanning facilities represent an invaluable tool for obtaining data on osteology without damaging the precious specimens, which is especially important for caecilians where the samples are often minimal (Gower et al. 2010; Wilkinson et al. 2014). Osteological characters have been traditionally used for the higher-level taxonomic and phylogenetic studies of caecilians (Taylor 1969; Nussbaum 1979; Wilkinson and Nussbaum 1999; Maddin et al. 2012; Wilkinson et al. 2011, 2014); however, to a much lesser extent in alpha-taxonomic studies. Wilkinson et al. (2014) provided an osteological comparison of three Ichthyophis species and noted that osteological characters should be cautiously interpreted, as they may often be subjected to a significant intraspecific variation related to the age of the specimen or other factors. Nevertheless, Wilkinson et al. (2014) noted that the cranial osteology may be a very useful source of data for ichthyophiid taxonomy. In the present study, we provided a detailed description of cranial and mandibular bones and the atlas for I. griseivermis sp. nov. and compared its cranial morphology with the data for six other congeners. Further studies on the cranial morphology of Ichthyophiidae should not only assess the intra- and interspecific variations of the osteological characters discussed herein but also address the morphology of the soft tissues, including cranial nerves, blood vessels, and head musculature, which remain poorly studied for most caecilians.

Despite the above-mentioned gaps in our knowledge, the current study revealed new features of the skull structure of the ichthyophiids, which suggest some evolutionary transformations in the cranial morphology of caecilians. Nussbaum (1977, 1983) identified weakly stegokrotaphic skulls in some Ichthyophiidae as the skulls with a zone of weakness between the squamosal and parietal that permits lateromedial movement of the cheek region (without providing specific information on what species this condition is observed in). In the case of I. griseivermis sp. nov., the upper temporal fossa represents a substantial gap between the squamosal, the parietal, and the os basale, which is open posteriorly. Furthermore, the ridges on the parietal and the frontal likely serve as an area for the attachment of the adductor musculature in the new species. Though a more detailed study of musculature is required to clarify the functional anatomy of the skull of I. griseivermis sp. nov., from the micro-CT scanning data we can conclude that the adductor mandibulae muscle is likely not covering the dorsal surface of the frontal as in typical zygokrotaphid skulls as in rhinatrematids. However, the well-pronounced lateral ridge on the frontal, which continues further posteriorly on the parietal, suggests that the lateral portion of the m. adductor mandibulae is attached to the edge of this ridge laterally. Therefore, we think that the skull of the new species can not be treated as a stegokrotaphic. Hence, we propose the term ‘weak zygokrotaphy’ for this condition to underline that it is different from the ‘zone of weakness’ referred to as ‘weak stegokrotaphy’ by Nussbaum (1977, 1983). The presence of the narrow temporal fossa and, consequently, the weakly zygokrotaphic skull in the new species (this study), I. sikkimensis, and Uraeotyphlus narayani (see Nussbaum 1979; Gower et al. 2017), together with the absence of the temporal fossae and the fully stegokrotaphic skull in most Ichthyophis species (see Wilkinson et al. 2014; McGrath-Blaser et al. 2025; and our data; see Table S5 and the Data Availability Statement below), indicates that the structure of the temporal region is more variable in the ichthyophiids than previously thought.

The traditional distinction between the two variants of skull structure—the stegokrotaphy (the complete coverage of the temporal region and the jaw-closing muscles by the squamosal) and the zygokrotaphy (the incomplete coverage of the temporal region by the squamosal and the presence of the temporal fossa)—appears to be simplified. It is possible to distinguish an intermediate variant of the structure of the temporal region, which we herein refer to as the weak zygokrotaphy, when the narrow temporal fossae are present, but only some of the posterior fibers of the long adductor of the jaw (m. adductor mandibulae longus) are attached to the dorsal surface of the cranial roof. At the same time, the weak zygokrotaphy found in ichthyophiids corresponds functionally (by the arrangement and involvement of the jaw-closing muscles) to that found in advanced caecilians (Lowie et al. 2023). The variability of the structure of the temporal region (stegokrotaphy/weak stegokrotaphy/weak zygokrotaphy) in the ichthyophiids may represent the ancestral feature of all Neocaecilia (the group encompassing Teresomata and Ichthyophiidae, see Wilkinson and Nussbaum 2006).

It is widely recognized (Nussbaum 1977, 1983) that the evolution of stegokrotaphy in the Gymnophiona is likely influenced by an adaptation for burrowing, but the functional purpose of the stegokrotaphic skull is not limited to just forming a more rigid skull structure, as it does not provide a significant improvement in stress redistribution (Kleinteich et al. 2012). A possible explanation for the appearance of stegokrotaphy is that it first evolved as a protective mechanism for the m. adductor mandibulae longus during burrowing.

All of the Gymnophiona species have a peculiar dual jaw-closing mechanism, mainly provided by two muscles: the m. adductor mandibulae longus and the m. interhyoideus posterior (Nussbaum 1983; Lowie et al. 2023). In Rhinatrematidae, the m. adductor mandibulae longus originates from the surface of the cranial roof bones (the parietal and the frontal) and attaches to the coronoid process of the pseudoangular, a condition similar to other amphibians. The m. interhyoideus posterior is a long muscle that originates in the neck region and attaches to the retroarticular process of the pseudoangular. The function of m. interhyoideus posterior as a part of the jaw-closing mechanism is a novelty of Gymnophiona (Nussbaum 1977, 1983; Lowie et al. 2023).

In Rhinatrematidae, which represent the sister group of all other living caecilians, the m. adductor mandibulae longus is the main adductor muscle that is dominant over the m. interhyoideus posterior. It passes through the large temporal fossae and attaches to the sagittal crest of the parietals, leaving it exposed to external mechanical pressure (Nussbaum 1983; Lowie et al. 2023). This also correlates with the fact that rhinatrematids are more surface active than many other caecilians (Lowie et al. 2023). In more advanced caecilians, including Ichthyophiidae, the m. adductor mandibulae longus is reduced in size and attaches to the ventrolateral surface of the frontals and parietals, and the role of the main adductor is taken over by the m. interhyoideus posterior.

Regardless of the condition of the temporal region (stegokrotaphy/weak zygokrotaphy), the ichthyophiids show a decrease in the importance of the m. adductor mandibulae longus in the jaw-closing mechanism compared to rhinatrematids. The m. interhyoideus posterior likely takes over the role of the main adductor of the jaw, and the retroarticular process of the pseudoangular is upturned to facilitate this function by moving the point of attachment to a more mechanically advantageous position. This condition of the retroarticular process is also present in all members of other, more advanced, groups of Gymnophiona. However, in the ichtyophiids, the upturned position of the retroarticular process is well pronounced, probably because the m. interhyoideus posterior itself is less developed and strong (Lowie et al. 2023), requiring more mechanical advantage.

According to the classical works by Nussbaum (1977, 1979, 1983), more recent studies (Kleinteich et al. 2012; Lowie et al. 2023), and our data on the cranial morphology of the ichthyophiids, the evolution of the temporal region in caecilians is presented as follows. In the Rhinatrematidae, the skull is zygokrotaphic, but the jaw-closing system is distinct from all other caecilians—the m. adductor mandibulae longus is dominant over the m. interhyoideus posterior (Nussbaum 1977, 1983; Lowie et al. 2023). As argued by Nussbaum (1977) the rhinatrematid condition is ancestral for caecilians. During the transition to more advanced forms (Ichthyophiidae), there was a loss of rhinatrematid-type zygokrotaphy due to reorganization of the jaw muscles, and the acquisition of the m. interhyoideus-dominant jaw-closing system characteristic of more advanced caecilians (the m. interhyoideus posterior is dominant over the m. adductor mandibulae longus) (Nussbaum 1983; Lowie et al. 2023). In the Ichthyophiidae, in addition to the m. interhyoideus-dominant jaw-closing system, the secondary stegokrotaphy (in which the contact of the squamosal with the frontal and parietal bones is weak, referred to as “weak stegokrotaphy” by Nussbaum 1983) and the secondary weak zygokrotaphy (see Ramaswami 1941; Nussbaum 1979; this study) likely appeared simultaneously, and these features became variable within the group. Later, in the higher caecilians (i.e., Teresomata), some groups retained the stegokrotaphic structure of the skull, and some have acquired well-developed zygokrotaphy (Nussbaum 1983; Wilkinson and Nussbaum 2006).

In addition, a comparison of the skulls of Ichthyophiidae and Rhinatrematidae revealed the presence of primitive cranial features in ichthyophiids that are found in stem caecilians (Nussbaum 1977, 1979; Jenkins et al. 2007). Thus, in ichthyophiids compared to rhinatrematids, a greater number of ossified elements are present in the cranial roof (namely, the prefrontal bone), the contact between the maxillopalatine and the quadrate is absent (present in rhinatrematids except for the genus Amazops Wilkinson et al., 2021; see Wilkinson et al. 2021), and the contact between the frontal and squamosal bones is present (absent in rhinatrematids except Amazops; see Wilkinson et al. 2021) (Nussbaum 1977, 1979). Accordingly, despite their phylogenetic position, rhinatrematids are specialized forms that combine the retained primitive pattern of jaw muscle attachment and the associated cranial features (the presence of the sagittal crest on the parietal, the retroarticular process of the pseudoangular posteriorly oriented; see Lowie et al. 2023) with independently acquired derived features in the cranial roof structure (Nussbaum 1977). The ichthyophiid skull may actually represent a more suitable ‘ancestral’ version of skull composition to reconstruct some aspects of the evolution of the skull in advanced caecilians than the rhinatrematid skull (Nussbaum 1977, 1979). During the transition from the primitive cranial structure to the more advanced one, reduction (namely, reduction of the prefrontal) and fusion of the cranial bones (with the formation of such compound bone elements as the nasopremaxilla and pterygoquadrate), as well as the appearance of the mesethmoid on the dorsal surface of the skull, are observed (Nussbaum 1977, 1979; for details of skull morphology in advanced caecilians, see Wake 2003; Wilkinson et al. 2011).

Data availability

We deposited the scans for this study into MorphoSource using the following links:

Ichthyophis griseivermis sp. nov. (ZMMU A-8208, holo­type): https://www.morphosource.org/concern/media/000708101

Ichthyophis nguyenorum (ZMMU NAP-03122): https://www.morphosource.org/concern/media/000708075

Ichthyophis supachaii (ZMMU NAP-11349): https://www.morphosource.org/concern/media/000708090

Acknowledgements

The fieldwork was completed within the framework and with partial financial support from the research project “Conservation, restoration, and sustainable use of tropical forest ecosystems based on the study of their structural and functional organization” of the Joint Vietnam-Russia Tropical Science and Technology Research Center for 2024 and 2025. Permission to conduct fieldwork in Vietnam was granted by the Department of Forestry, the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development of Vietnam, and local administrations of Thanh Hoa (permit numbers #562/GP of 01.06.2022 and #179/SNN&PTNT-CCKL of 05.10.2023) and Nghe An provinces (permit number #2089/UBND.VX of 03.04.2019). The authors are grateful to Andrey N. Kuznetsov (VRTC, Hanoi), Hoi Dang Nguyen (VRTC, Hanoi), Leonid P. Korzoun (MSU, Moscow), Bao Nguyen Le (DTU, Da Nang), as well as the Xuan Lien NP and Pu Hoat NR ranger staff (Thanh Hoa and Nghe An, Vietnam) for their support, organization, and assistance with the fieldwork. We express our gratitude to Alexey A. Polilov (MSU, Moscow) and Evgeny Scherbakov (MSU, Moscow) for the opportunity to conduct the osteological study using the Bruker Skyscan 1272 tomograph of the Biological Faculty of Moscow State University; and to the MSU HerpLab members, including Tang Van Duong (VNMN, Hanoi) for assistance in the lab. We thank Mark Wilkinson, Alexander Kupfer and an anonymous reviewer for numerous helpful comments and suggestions that allowed us to improve the previous version of the manuscript. This work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation to N. A. Poyarkov (Grant No. 22-14-00037-P, molecular and morphological analyses, data analysis) and in part by the Rufford Foundation to T. V. Nguyen (Grant No. 45888-2, data analysis).

References

  • Abramov AV, Tran TQ (2017) Zoogeography of insectivorous mammals of Vietnam. Journal of Tropical Science and Technology (Hanoi) 14: 49–58.
  • Angel F (1929) Liste des Reptiles et Batraciens du Haut-Laos recueillis par M. Delacour. Descriptions d’un genre, de deux espèces et d’une variété d’Ophidiens. Bulletin du Muséum d’Histoire Naturelle 2: 75–81.
  • Averyanov LV, Phan LK, Nguyen HT, Harder DK (2003) Phytogeographic review of Vietnam and adjacent areas of Eastern Indochina. Komarovia 3: 1–83.
  • Bain RH, Hurley MM (2011) A biogeographic synthesis of the amphibians and reptiles of Indochina. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 360: 1–138. https://doi.org/10.1206/360.1
  • Bardua C, Wilkinson M, Gower DJ, Sherratt E, Goswami A (2019) Morphological evolution and modularity of the caecilian skull. BMC Evolutionary Biology 19: 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-018-1342-7
  • Breckenridge WR, Jayasinghe S (1979) Observations on the eggs and larvae of Ichthyophis glutinosus. Ceylon Journal of Science 13: 187–202.
  • Burckhardt R (1891) Untersuchungen am Hirn und Geruchsorgan von Triton und Ichthyophis. Zeitschrift für wissenschaftliche Zoologie 52: 1–36
  • Delacour J (1933) Dix ans d’explorations zoologiques en Indochine. La Terre et la Vie 3: 539–550.
  • Dubois A, Ohler A, Pyron RA (2021) New concepts and methods for phylogenetic taxonomy and nomenclature in zoology, exemplified by a new ranked cladonomy of recent amphibians (Lissamphibia). Megataxa 5: 1–738. https://doi.org/10.11646/megataxa.5.1.1
  • Frost DR, Grant T, Faivovich J, Bain RH, Haas A, Haddad CFB, de Sá RO, Channing A, Wilkinson M, Donnellan SC, Raxworthy CJ, Campbell JA, Blotto BL, Moler PE, Drewes RC, Nussbaum RA, Lynch JD, Green DM, Wheeler WC (2006) The amphibian tree of life. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 297: 1–370. https://doi.org/10.1206/0003-0090(2006)297[0001:TATOL]2.0.CO;2
  • Geissler G, Poyarkov NA, Grismer LL, Nguyen TQ, An HT, Neang T, Kupfer A, Ziegler T, Böhme W, Müller H (2015) New Ichthyophis species from Indochina (Gymnophiona, Ichthyophiidae): 1. The unstriped forms with descriptions of three new species and the redescriptions of I. acuminatus Taylor, 1960, I. youngorum Taylor, 1960 and I. laosensis Taylor, 1969. Organisms Diversity & Evolution 15: 143–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13127-014-0190-6
  • Gorin VA, Orlov NL, Bragin AM, Pawangkhanant P, Milto KD, Le DX, Nguyen TV, Suwannapoom C, Poyarkov NA (2024) Phylogeographic pattern and taxonomic revision of the Kaloula baleata species complex (Amphibia: Anura: Microhylidae) with description of two new species from Indochina. Herpetozoa 37: 391–420. https://doi.org/10.3897/herpetozoa.37.e137394
  • Gower DJ, Giri VB, Kamei RG, Oommen OV, Khot R, Wilkinson M (2017) On the absence of Ichthyophis sikkimensis Taylor, 1960 (Amphibia: Gymnophiona: Ichthyophiidae) in the Western Ghats of peninsular India. Herpetological Journal 27: 181–187.
  • Gower DJ, Kupfer A, Oommen OV, Himstedt W, Nussbaum RA, Loader S, Presswell B, Muller H, Krishna SB, Boistel R, Wilkinson M (2002) A molecular phylogeny of ichthyophiid caecilians (Amphibia: Gymnophiona: Ichthyophiidae): Out of India or out of South East Asia? Proceedings of the Royal Society B 269: 1563–1569. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2002.2050
  • Gower DJ, Wilkinson M, Sherratt E, Kok PJR (2010) A new species of Rhinatrema Duméril & Bibron (Amphibia: Gymnophiona: Rhinatrematidae) from Guyana. Zootaxa 2391: 47–60. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.193887
  • Hall TA (1999) BioEdit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic acids symposium series 41: 95–98. https://doi.org/10.47605/tapro.v10i1.244
  • Hillis DM, Moritz C, Mable BK, Graur D (1996) Molecular Systematics, 2nd Edition. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, 655 pp.
  • IUCN Standards and Petitions Subcommittee (2019) Guidelines for Using the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria. Version 14. Prepared by the Standards and Petitions Subcommittee, IUCN, Gland, 113 pp.
  • Jia J, Gao KQ, Jiang JP, Bever GS, Xiong R, Wei G (2020) Comparative osteology of the hynobiid complex Liua-Protohynobius-Pseudohynobius (Amphibia, Urodela). Journal of Anatomy 238: 219–248. https://doi.org/10.1111/joa.13311
  • Jia J, Jiang J-P, Zhang M-H, Gao K-Q (2019) Osteology of Batrachuperus yenyuanensis (Urodela, Hynobiidae), a high-altitude mountain stream salamander from western China. PLoS ONE 14: e0211069. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211069
  • Kamei RG, San Mauro D, Gower DJ, Van Bocxlaer I, Sherratt E, Thomas A, Babu S, Bossuyt F, Wilkinson M, Biju SD (2012) Discovery of a new family of amphibians from Northeast India with ancient links to Africa. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 279: 2396–2401. http://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2012.0150
  • Kamei RG, Wilkinson M, Gower DJ, Biju SD (2009) Three new species of striped Ichthyophis (Amphibia: Gymnophiona: Ichthyophiidae) from the northeast Indian states of Manipur and Nagaland. Zootaxa 2267: 26–42. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.190862
  • Katoh K, Rozewicki J, Yamada KD (2019) MAFFT online service: Multiple sequence alignment, interactive sequence choice and visualization. Briefings in Bioinformatics 20: 1160–1166. https://doi.org/10.1093/bib/bbx108
  • Kleinteich T, Haas A (2007) Cranial musculature in the larva of the caecilian, Ichthyophis kohtaoensis (Lissamphibia: Gymnophiona). Journal of Morphology 268: 74–88. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.10503
  • Kleinteich T, Haas A, Summers AP (2008) Caecilian jaw-closing mechanics: Integrating two muscle systems. Journal of the Royal Society 5: 1491–1504. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2008.0155
  • Kleinteich T, Maddin HC, Herzen J, Beckmann F, Summers AP (2012) Is solid always best? Cranial performance in solid and fenestrated caecilian skulls. Journal of Experimental Biology 215: 833–844. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.065979
  • Kligman BT, Gee BM, Marsh AD, Nesbitt SJ, Smith ME, Parker WG, Stocker MR (2023) Triassic stem caecilian supports dissorophoid origin of living amphibians. Nature 614: 102–107. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05646-5
  • Kotharambath R, Wilkinson M, Gower DJ (2024) Striped Ichthyophis Fitzinger, 1826 (Amphibia: Gymnophiona: Ichthyophiidae) from the Western Ghats of peninsular India in the collection of London’s Natural History Museum and their implications for taxonomy and distribution. Journal of Vertebrate Biology 73: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.25225/jvb.23073
  • Kupfer A, Müller H (2004) On the taxonomy of ichthyophiid caecilians from southern Thailand: A reevaluation of the holotype of Ichthyophis supachaii Taylor 1960 (Amphibia: Gymnophiona: Ichthyophiidae). Amphibia-Reptilia 25: 87–97. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853804322992869
  • Kupfer A, Nabhitabhata J, Himstedt W (2005) Life history of amphibians in the seasonal tropics: Habitat, community and population ecology of a caecilian (genus Ichthyophis). Journal of Zoology 266: 237–247.
  • Lalremsanga HT, Purkayastha J, Biakzuala L, Mathipi M, Muansanga L, Hmar GZ (2021b) A new striped species of Ichthyophis Fitzinger, 1826 (Amphibia: Gymnophiona: Ichthyophiidae) from Mizoram, northeast India. Amphibian & Reptile Conservation 15: 198–209.
  • Lalremsanga HT, Purkayastha J, Mathipi M, Muansanga L, Decemson H, Biakzuala L (2021a) Range extension of Ichthyophis multicolor Wilkinson et al., 2014 to India and first molecular identification of Ichthyophis moustakius Kamei et al., 2009. Check List 17: 1021–1029. https://doi.org/10.15560/17.4.1021
  • Lanfear R, Calcott B, Ho SY, Guindon S (2012) PartitionFinder: Combined selection of partitioning schemes and substitution models for phylogenetic analyses. Molecular Biology and Evolution 29: 1695–1701. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mss020
  • Lowie A, De Kegel B, Wilkinson M, Measey J, O’Reilly JC, Kley NJ, Gaucher P, Adriaens D, Herrel A (2023) The anatomy of the head muscles in caecilians (Amphibia: Gymnophiona): Variation in relation to phylogeny and ecology? Journal of Anatomy 242: 312–326. https://doi.org/10.1111/joa.13763
  • Lowie A, De Kegel B, Wilkinson M, Measey J, O’Reilly JC, Kley NJ, Gaucher P, Brecko J, Kleinteich T, Herrel A, Adriaens D (2022) Regional differences in vertebral shape along the axial skeleton in caecilians (Amphibia: Gymnophiona). Journal of Anatomy 241: 716–728. https://doi.org/10.1111/joa.13682
  • Maddin HC (2011) Deciphering morphological variation in the braincase of caecilian amphibians (Gymnophiona). Journal of Morphology 272: 850–871. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.10953
  • Maddin HC, Russell AP, Anderson JS (2012) Phylogenetic implications of the morphology of the braincase of caecilian amphibians (Gymnophiona). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 166: 160–201. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.2012.00838.x
  • McGrath-Blaser SE, Grafe U, Torres-Sánchez M, McLeod DS, Stuart BL (2025) Cutaneous bacterial microbiome description and new locality record of the poorly known striped caecilian Ichthyophis asplenius Taylor, 1965 in Bruneian Borneo. Journal of Natural History 59: 29–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2024.2442749
  • Mulcahy DG, Lee JL, Miller AH, Chand M, Thura MK, Zug GR (2018) Filling the BINs of life: Report of an amphibian and reptile survey of the Tanintharyi (Tenasserim) Region of Myanmar, with DNA barcode data. ZooKeys 757: 85–152. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.757.24453
  • Müller H, Oommen OV, Bartsch P (2005) Skeletal development of the direct-developing caecilian Gegeneophis ramaswamii (Amphibia: Gymnophiona: Caeciliidae). Zoomorphology 124: 171–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00435-005-0005-6
  • Müller J (1835) Ueber die Kiemenlöcher der jungen Coecilia hypocyanea. Archiv für Anatomie, Physiologie und wissenschaftliche Medicin 1835: 391–398.
  • Nguyen LT, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Bui MQ (2015) IQ-TREE: A fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum likelihood phylogenies. Molecular Biology and Evolution 32: 268–274. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msu300
  • Nguyen SV, Ho CT, Nguyen TQ (2009) Herpetofauna of Vietnam. Chimaira, Frankfurt, 768 pp.
  • Nguyen TV, Duong TV, Luu KT, Poyarkov NA (2020) A new species of Kurixalus (Anura: Rhacophoridae) from northern Vietnam with comments on the biogeography of the genus. Journal of Natural History 54: 195–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2020.1728411
  • Nguyen TV, Liu S, Tran VT, Tran TG, Trofimets AV, Dau VQ, Poyarkov NA (2024a) Range extension and expanded description of Micryletta hekouensis Liu, Hou, Mo & Rao, 2021 (Amphibia: Anura: Microhylidae), with comments on Micryletta of northern Vietnam. Herpetozoa 37: 111–121. https://doi.org/10.3897/herpetozoa.37.e120524
  • Nguyen TV, Liu S, Wilkinson JA, Tran TG, Tran PN, Dau VQ, Poyarkov NA (2024b) Range extension and expanded description of Rhacophorus napoensis Li, Liu, Yu & Sun, 2022 (Amphibia: Anura: Rhacophorinae) with the first country record from Vietnam. Herpetozoa 37: 123–136. https://doi.org/10.3897/herpetozoa.37.e122317
  • Nguyen TV, Pham CT, Nguyen TQ (2016) New records and an updated list of snakes (Squamata: Serpentes) from Xuan Lien Nature Reserve, Thanh Hoa Province, Vietnam. Journal of Biology 38: 324–332. https://doi.org/10.15625/0866-7160/v38n3.8448
  • Nishikawa K, Matsui M, Yambun P (2012b) A new unstriped Ichthyophis (Amphibia: Gymnophiona: Ichthyophiidae) from Mt. Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia. Current Herpetology 31: 67–77. https://doi.org/10.5358/hsj.31.67
  • Nishikawa K, Matsui M, Yong HS, Ahmad N, Yambun P, Belabut DM, Sudin A, Orlov NL, Ota H, Yoshikawa N, Tominaga A, Shimada T, Shimada T (2012a) Molecular phylogeny and biogeography of caecilians from Southeast Asia (Amphibia, Gymnophiona, Ichthyophiidae), with special reference to high cryptic species diversity in Sundaland. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 63: 714–723. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2012.02.017
  • Nishikawa K, Matsui M, Yoshikawa N, Khonsue W, Pomchote P, Hi­bino M, Nguyen T. T, Sanamxay D (2021) Ichthyophis bannanicus Yang, 1984, a junior subjective synonym of I. kohtaoensis Taylor, 1960 (Amphibia, Gymnophiona, Ichthyophiidae). Alytes 38: 1–17.
  • Norris HW, Hughes SP (1918) The cranial and anterior spinal nerves of the caecilian amphibians. Journal of Morphology 31: 489–560.
  • Nussbaum RA (1977) Rhinatrematidae: A new family of caecilians (Amphibia: Gymnophiona). Occasional Papers of the Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan 682: 1–30.
  • Nussbaum RA (1979) The taxonomic status of the caecilian genus Uraeotyphlus Peters. Occasional Papers of the Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan 687: 1–20.
  • Nussbaum RA (1983) The evolution of a unique dual jaw-closing mechanism in caecilians (Amphibia: Gymnophiona) and its bearing on caecilian ancestry. Journal of Zoology 199: 545–554.
  • Nussbaum RA, Gans C (1980) On the Ichthyophis (Amphibia: Gymnophiona) of Sri Lanka. Spolia Zeylanica 35: 137–154.
  • Olson DM, Dinerstein E, Wikramanayake ED, Burgess ND, Powell GV, Underwood EC, D’amico JA, Itoua I, Strand HE, Morrison JC, Loucks CJ (2001) Terrestrial Ecoregions of the World: A new map of life on Earth. A new global map of terrestrial ecoregions provides an innovative tool for conserving biodiversity. BioScience 51: 933–938. https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0933:TEOTWA]2.0.CO;2
  • Palakkool SR, Gower DJ, Kotharambath R (2022) Osteology of the caecilian Gegeneophis carnosus (Beddome, 1870) (Amphibia: Gymnophiona: Grandisoniidae) from the Western Ghats of peninsular India. Vertebrate Zoology 72: 561–576. https://doi.org/10.3897/vz.72.e79911
  • Peter K (1898) Die Entwicklung und funktionelle Gestaltung des Schädels von Ichthyophis glutinosus. Morphologisches Jahrbuch 25: 554–628.
  • Pham CT, Nguyen TQ, Hoang CV, Ziegler T (2016) New records and an updated list of Amphibians from Xuan Lien Nature Reserve, Thanh Hoa Province, Vietnam. Herpetology Notes 9: 31–41.
  • Poyarkov NA, Nguyen TV, Arkhipov DV (2021b) A new species of the genus Tylototriton (Amphibia, Caudata, Salamandridae) from central Vietnam. Taprobanica 10: 4–22. https://doi.org/10.47605/tapro.v10i1.244
  • Poyarkov NA, Nguyen TV, Le SX Le DX, Arkhipov DV, Gorin VA, Hernandez A, Dufresnes C (2024) Multiple lines of evidence for a new cryptic species of Tylototriton (Amphibia, Salamandridae) from northern Vietnam. Alytes 41: 56–98.
  • Poyarkov NA, Nguyen TV, Popov ES, Geissler P, Pawangkhanant P, Neang T, Suwannapoom C, Ananjeva NB, Orlov NL (2023) Recent progress in taxonomic studies, biogeographic analysis, and revised checklist of reptiles in Indochina. Russian Journal of Herpetology 30: 255–476. https://doi.org/10.30906/1026-2296-2023-30-5-255-476
  • Poyarkov NA, Nguyen TV, Popov ES, Geissler P, Pawangkhanant P, Neang T, Suwannapoom C, Orlov NL (2021a) Recent progress in taxonomic studies, biogeographic analysis and revised checklist of amphibians in Indochina. Russian Journal of Herpetology 28: 1–110. https://doi.org/10.30906/1026-2296-2021-28-3A-1-110
  • Poyarkov NA, Nguyen TV, Trofimets AV, Gorin VA (2020) A new cryptic species of the genus Microhyla (Amphibia: Microhylidae) from Langbian Plateau, Vietnam. Taprobanica 9: 136–163. https://doi.org/10.47605/tapro.v9i2.228
  • Ramaswami LS (1941) Some aspects of the cranial morphology of Uraeotyphlus narayani Seshachar (Apoda). Records of the Indian Museum 43: 143–207.
  • Ramaswami LS (1942) An account of the head morphology of Gegeneophis carnosus (Beddome), Apoda. Journal of the Mysore University 3: 205–220.
  • Rambaut A, Drummond AJ, Xie D, Baele G, Suchard MA (2018) Posterior summarization in Bayesian phylogenetics using Tracer 1.7. Systematic Biology 67: 901–904. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syy032
  • Rowley JJL, Dau VQ, Cao TT (2017) A new species of LeptolalaxAnura: Megophryidae) from Vietnam. Zootaxa 4273: 61–79.
  • Rowley JJL, Nguyen SN, Dau VQ, Nguyen TT, Cao TT (2011) A new species of Gracixalus (Anura: Rhacophoridae) with a hyperextended vocal repertoire from Vietnam. Zootaxa 3125: 22–38.
  • San Mauro D, Gower DJ, Oommen OV, Wilkinson M, Zardoya R (2004) Phylogeny of caecilian amphibians (Gymnophiona) based on complete mitochondrial genomes and nuclear RAG1. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 33: 413–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2004.05.014
  • Santos RO, Wilkinson M, Zaher H (2025) An overview of the postcranial osteology of caecilians (Gymnophiona, Lissamphibia). Anatomical Record 2025: 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.70000
  • Sarasin P, Sarasin F (1887–1890) Ergebnisse naturwissenschaftlicher Forschungen auf Ceylon in den Jahren 1884–1886 Band II: Zur Entwicklungsgeschichte und Anatomie der Ceylonesischen Blindwühle Ichthyophis glutinosus. C. W. Kreidels, Wiesbaden, 264 pp., plate XV.
  • Schmidt A, Wake MH (1990) Olfactory and vomeronasal systems of caecilians (Amphibia: Gymnophiona). Journal of Morphology 205: 255–268.
  • Skutschas PP (2009) Re-evaluation of Mynbulakia Nesov, 1981 (Lissamphibia: Caudata) and description of a new salamander genus from the Late Cretaceous of Uzbekistan. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 29: 659–664. https://doi.org/10.1671/039.029.0326
  • Stuart BL, Seateun S, Sivongxay N, Phimmachak S (2024) Amphibians (Class Amphibia) In: WCS 2024. Wildlife in Lao PDR, 2024 Status Report. Wildlife Conservation Society Lao PDR Program, Vientiane, 1–459.
  • Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S (2013) MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 6.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30: 2725–2729. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst197
  • Taylor EH (1960) On the caecilian species Ichthyophis monochrous and Ichthyophis glutinosus and related species. University of Kansas Science Bulletin 40: 37–120.
  • Taylor EH (1968) The Caecilians of the World: A Taxonomic Review. University of Kansas (Science Bulletin), Lawrence, KS, vii, 848 pp.
  • Taylor EH (1969a) Skulls of Gymnophiona and their significance in the taxonomy of the group. The University of Kansas Science Bulletin 48: 585–687.
  • Taylor EH (1969b) Miscellaneous notes and descriptions of new forms of caecilians. University of Kansas Science Bulletin 48: 281–296.
  • Trofimets AV, Dufresnes C, Pawangkhanant P, Bragin AM, Gorin VA, Hasan M, Lalremsanga HT, Muin MA, Le DX, Nguyen TV, Suwannapoom C, Poyarkov NA (2024) Four in one: an integrative taxonomic revision of the Microhyla berdmorei complex (Amphibia: Anura: Microhylidae) illustrates the tremendous amphibian diversity of Southeast Asia. Vertebrate Zoology 74: 595–641. https://doi.org/10.3897/vz.74.e127937
  • Visser MHC (1963) The cranial morphology of Ichthyophis glutinosus (Linne) and Ichthyophis monochrous (Bleeker). Annale Universiteit van Stellenbosch 38A: 67–102.
  • Wake MH (1980) Morphometrics of the skeleton of Dermophis mexi­canus (Amphibia Gymnophiona). Part I. The vertebrae, with comparison to other species. Journal of Morphology 165: 17–130. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.1051650202
  • Wake MH (2003) The osteology of caecilians. In: Heatwole H, Davies M (Eds) Amphibian Biology, Vol. 5. Surrey Beatty, Chipping Norton, 1809–1876.
  • Wiedersheim R (1879) Die Anatomie der Gymnophionen. G. Fischer, Jena, 101 pp.
  • Wilkinson M (2012) Caecilians. Current Biology 22: R668–R669.
  • Wilkinson M, Nussbaum RA (1996) On the phylogenetic position of the Uraeotyphlidae (Amphibia: Gymnophiona). Copeia 1996: 550–562.
  • Wilkinson M, Nussbaum RA (2006) Caecilian phylogeny and classification. In: Exbrayat J-M (Ed.) Reproductive Biology and Phylogeny of Gymnophiona (caecilians). Science Publishers, Inc., Enfield, NH, 39–78.
  • Wilkinson M, Presswell B, Sherratt E, Papadopoulou A, Gower DJ (2014) A new species of striped Ichthyophis Fitzinger, 1826 (Amphibia: Gymnophiona: Ichthyophiidae) from Myanmar. Zootaxa 3785: 45–58. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3785.1.4
  • Wilkinson M, Sheps J, Oommen OV, Cohen BL (2002) Phylogenetic relationships of Indian caecilians (Amphibia: Gymnophiona) inferred from mitochondrial rRNA gene sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 23: 401–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1055-7903(02)00031-3

Appendix 1

List of abbreviations of the osteological features.

acot – anterior cotyles

addr – ridge for the attachment of the long adductor of the lower jaw

alp – anterolateral process of the quadrate

amp – anteromedial process of the quadrate

ap – anterior process

apm – anterior process of the maxillary part of the maxillopalatine

app – anterior process of the palatal part of the maxillopalatine

bas – os basale

bca – basicranial articulation

bp – basal process of the pterygoid

canp – canalis primordialis

car – foramen for the carotid artery

car+VIIpal – foramen for the carotid artery and the palatal branch of the facial nerve

ccr – curved crest of the vomer

ch – choana

con – condyle

corb – circumorbital

cp – columellar process of the stapes

cpr – ridge of the columellar process of the stapes

dm – depression for the attachment of the m. depressor mandibulae

dmp – dorsomedial process of the sphenethmoid

dp – dorsal process of the septomaxilla

dv? – incisure for the dorsal vein

fe – endolymphatic foramen

ff – facet for contact of the nasal or the parietal with the frontal

fm – foramen magnum

fp – facial process of the maxillopalatine

fper – perilymphatic foramen

fpl – footplate of the stapes

front – frontal

fv – fenestra vestibuli

jf – jugular foramen

lg – longitudinal grooves of the vomer

ltf – lower temporal fossa

mo – medial outgrowth of the atlantal centrum

mp – medial portion of the dorsal process of the septomaxilla

mpc - mediopalatinal cavity

mpp – medial process of the palatal part of the maxillopalatine

mxf – facet for contact of the prefrontal or the squamosal with the maxillopalatine

mxpal – maxillopalatine

na – neural arch

nas – nasal

nf – facet for contact of the frontal with the nasal

nos – nostrils

ns – nasal septum

oc – occipital condyles

orb+tc – orbit and tentacular canal

p – posterior process of the maxillary part of the maxillopalatine

pa – processus ascendens of the quadrate

par – parietal

pc – processus condyloideus of the pseudoarticular

pcot – posterior condyle

pdent – pars dentalis of the premaxilla

pdor – pars dorsalis of the premaxilla

pff – facet for contact of the frontal with the prefrontal

pi – processus internus of the pseudoarticular

pmp – premaxillary process of the vomer

pmx – premaxilla

po – processus oticus of the quadrate

pp – posterior process of the palatal part of the maxillopalatine

ppal – pars palatina

ppn – posterior process of the nasal

prfr – prefrontal

psa – pseudoangular

psaf – facet for contact of the pseudodentary with the pseudoangular

psd – pseudodentary

pt – pterygoid

pzp – postzygopophyseal processes

q – quadrate

qf – facet for contact of the squamosal with the quadrate

rap – retroarticular process

scs – spinal cord support

smx – septomaxilla

sn – sola nasi (processus conchoides)

snf – spinal nerve foramen

spf – facet for contact of the parietal with the sphenethmoid

sphen – sphenethmoid

sq – squamosal

sqf – facet for contact of the quadrate with the squamosal

st – stapes

sta – groove for the stapedial artery

tc – tentacular canal

utf – upper temporal fossa

vcf – foramina leading to the inner vomerine cavity

vf – vomeral foramen

vlr – ventrolateral ridge of the frontal

vo – vomeronasal organ cavity

vom – vomer

vp – ventral process of the septomaxilla

Id – incisure for the dorsal branch of the olfactory nerve

Iv – foramen for the ventral branch of the olfactory nerve

II – incisure for the optic nerve

Vim – foramen for the intermandibular branch of the trigeminal nerve

Vmd – foramina for the mandibular branch of the trigeminal nerve

Vmde – foramina for the external branch of the mandibular division of the trigeminal nerve

Vmx – foramen for the maxillary branch of the trigeminal nerve

Vop – foramen for the deep ophthalmic branch of the trigeminal nerve

Vop+mx – foramina for the maxillary and the deep ophthalmic branches of the trigeminal nerve

V+VII – groove for combined alveolar branches of the trigeminal and facial nerves

VII – foramen for the trunk of the facial nerve

VIIalv – foramina for the alveolar branch of the facial nerve

VIIIa – foramen for the anterior branch of the auditory nerve

VIIIp – foramen for the posterior branch of the auditory nerve

VIIImd – foramina for the medial branches of the auditory nerve

Supplementary materials

Supplementary material 1 

Figures S1–S17

Poyarkov NA, Skorinova DD, Bragin AM, Kolchanov VV, Gorin VA, Trofimets AV, Yuzefovich AP, Le DX, ­Nguyen TV, Skutschas PP (2025)

Data type: .pdf

Explanation notes: Figure S1–S14. 3D reconstructions of the holotype of Ichthyophis griseivermis sp. nov.Figure S15. The holotype of Ichthyophis griseivermis sp. nov. in preservative. — Figure S16. The paratype of Ichthyophis griseivermis sp. nov. in preservative. — Figure S17. Natural habitat of Ichthyophis griseivermis sp. nov. at the type locality in Xuan Lien NR, Thanh Hoa Province, northern Vietnam.

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Download file (59.65 MB)
Supplementary material 2 

Tables S1–S5

Poyarkov NA, Skorinova DD, Bragin AM, Kolchanov VV, Gorin VA, Trofimets AV, Yuzefovich AP, Le DX, ­Nguyen TV, Skutschas PP (2025)

Data type: .pdf

Explanation notes: Table S1. Primers used in this study. — Table S2. Sequences and voucher specimens of the family Ichthyophiidae and outgroup taxa used in this study. — Table S3. Characteristics of analyzed DNA sequences and the proposed optimal evolutionary models for gene and codon partitions as estimated in PartitionFinder 2.1.1. — Table S4. Uncorrected p–distances (percentage) between the sequences of cyt b mtDNA gene (above the diagonal) and between the sequences of 16S rRNA mtDNA gene (below the diagonal) of species of the genus Ichthyophis included in the phylogenetic analyses. — Table S5. Potentially diagnostic characters of skull morphology that differ among 15 species of the genus Ichthyophis.

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Download file (573.69 kb)
login to comment