Research Article
Print
Research Article
Description of two new species of Ptyctolaemus (Squamata: Agamidae) from northeast India
expand article infoAmirtha Balan, Abhijit Das, Bitupan Boruah, Frank Tillack§, Samuel Lalronunga|, Veerappan Deepak#
‡ Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, India
§ Museum für Naturkunde, Berlin, Germany
| Holy Child Society, Nalkata, India
¶ Museum für Tierkunde, Dresden, Germany
# Newcastle University, Newcastle, United Kingdom
Open Access

Abstract

The genus Ptyctolaemus Peters, 1864 is currently represented by three species; P. gularis, P. collicristatus and P. chindwinensis. Previous molecular phylogenetic studies have highlighted additional lineages within P. gularis. Phylogenetic analysis using the ND2 mitochondrial gene recovered three distinct lineages in India. Multivariate analyses using morphological data placed the type specimen of P. gularis (ZMB 5004) with the samples collected from Meghalaya. We assign this lineage as P. gularis and describe the other two lineages as new species. Ptyctolaemus siangensis sp. nov. found west of Siang River in Arunachal Pradesh and Ptyctolaemus namdaphaensis sp. nov. found in Namdapha, Changlang district of Arunachal Pradesh. Although phenotypically similar the two new species differ from its congeners in gular colouration and subtle morphological differences.

Keywords

Agamids, Arunachal Pradesh, DNA, molecular, morphology, multivariate analysis

Introduction

The genus Ptyctolaemus Peters, 1864 is distributed in the Indo-Burma region and Xizang (Tibet), China (Schulte et al. 2004; Liu et al. 2021; Uetz et al. 2025). Ptyctolaemus collicristatus Schulte & Vindum, 2004 is restricted to the Chin Hills in southwestern Myanmar and P. chindwinensis Liu, Hou, Lwin & Rao, 2021 is reported only from Sagaing Division in northwest Myanmar. Ptyctolaemus gularis (Peters, 1864) is widely distributed across northeast India, Bangladesh, northern Myanmar and southwest China (Boulenger 1890; Wall 1908; Shreve 1940; Smith 1940; Huang 1980; Mathew 1995; Pawar and Birand 2001; Schulte et al. 2004; Ahsan et al. 2008; Das et al. 2016) and is considered to be a species complex (Liu et al. 2021). The holotype of P. gularis is deposited at the Museum für Naturkunde Berlin, Germany, with collection number ZMB 5004. This specimen was acquired from a dealer of natural history objects and is said to have come from Calcutta (now Kolkata, West Bengal State, India; Peters 1864; Jerdon 1870). The stated locality has been questioned several times in the past (e.g., Wall 1908; Zhao and Adler 1993; Zhao et al. 1999; Schulte et al. 2004; Che et al. 2020; Liu et al. 2021).

Liu et al. (2021) highlighted two undescribed lineages apart from P. chindwinensis, one from Kachin, Myanmar and another from Tibet, China. The three described species of Ptyctolaemus are cryptic in morphology with very limited external diagnostic characters (Liu et al. 2021). Body ratios based on limited sample sizes were used to distinguish species and in at least one species (P. chindwinensis) females lack any conspicuous colouration on the gular region (Liu et al. 2021). Body size and ratios were used previously as diagnostic characters for other agamids from India (Deepak et al. 2016, 2018) due to overlapping meristic characters.

For this study, we collected specimens of Ptyctolaemus from 29 different locations across four states in northeast India and examined the type material. We were able to identify and allocate one population as the true P. gularis based on the holotype data. The other two populations are described as new species herein.

Materials and Methods

Sampling

A total of 44 individuals of Ptyctolaemus lizards were collected from 29 localities in northeast India (Fig. 1; Table 1). Voucher specimens were then fixed in 95% ethanol or in 4% formaldehyde solution, preserved in 70% ethanol, and deposited in the Wildlife Institute of India (WII) collection and the Zoological Survey of India (ZSI), Kol­kata. Prior to fixation, liver tissue samples were collected in 99.9% molecular grade ethanol and stored at –20°C. In addition we examined the holotype of P. gularis (ZMB 5004) from the Museum für Naturkunde Berlin, Germany.

Figure 1. 

Sampling localities of the current study and type localities of the Ptyctolaemus species. See Table 1 for sampling locality (1–31) details. Type localities are indicated by stars and other localities are indicated with a circle. Green circles: Ptyctolaemus gularis; purple star and circle: Ptyctolaemus siangensis sp. nov.; blue star and circle: Ptyctolaemus namdaphaensis sp. nov.; yellow star: Ptyctolaemus collicristatus; pink star: Ptyctolaemus chindwinensis.

Table 1.

Sampling site details of this study. Serial numbers (Sl) correspond to those shown on the map in Figure 1.

Sl. No. Locality Latitude / Longitude
1 Khellong, West Kameng district, Arunachal Pradesh, India 27.00350, 92.24502
2 Nameri National Park, Assam, India 26.95051, 92.92221
3 Potin, Lower Subansiri district, Arunachal Pradesh, India 27.34786, 93.84970
4 Medog, China * 29.24414, 95.15913
5 Pittung, Upper Siang district, Arunachal Pradesh, India 28.67146, 94.96159
6 Jengging, Upper Siang district, Arunachal Pradesh, India 28.53543, 95.03106
7 Rottung, East Siang district, Arunachal Pradesh, India 28.14114, 95.15620
8 Sally lake, Mehao Wildlife Sanctuary, Lower Dibang valley district, Arunachal Pradesh, India 28.16814, 95.83751
9 Motijheel, Namdapha Tiger Reserve, Changlang district, Arunachal Pradesh, India 27.48644, 96.33136
10 Motijheel trail, Namdapha Tiger Reserve, Changlang district, Arunachal Pradesh, India 27.49624, 96.33304
11 Namdapha Tiger Reserve, Changlang district, Arunachal Pradesh, India 27.49689, 96.35438
12 Haldibari, Namdapha Tiger Reserve, Changlang district, Arunachal Pradesh, India 27.52453, 96.39913
13 Deban, Namdapha Tiger Reserve, Changlang district, Arunachal Pradesh, India 27.49445, 96.39022
14 Namdapha Tiger Reserve, Changlang district, Arunachal Pradesh, India 27.49548, 96.39190
15 Namdapha Tiger Reserve, Changlang district, Arunachal Pradesh, India 27.48404, 96.40473
16 Namdapha Tiger Reserve, Changlang district, Arunachal Pradesh, India 27.49338, 96.39535
17 Kamala valley, Namdapha Tiger Reserve, Changlang district, Arunachal Pradesh, India 27.45808, 96.42804
18 Kamala valley, Namdapha Tiger Reserve, Changlang district, Arunachal Pradesh, India 27.46457, 96.43790
19 40th mile, Namdapha Tiger Reserve, Changlang district, Arunachal Pradesh, India 27.48789, 96.54165
20 Kalai, Kamlang Tiger Reserve, Lohit district, Arunachal Pradesh, India 27.72294, 96.43460
21 Gandhigram, Changlang district, Arunachal Pradesh, India 27.26515, 96.93878
22 Jeypore, Dibrugarh district, Assam, India 27.25325, 95.57889
23 Daribokgre, East Garo Hills district, Meghalaya, India 25.49675, 90.32742
24 Tyrna, East Khasi Hills district, Meghalaya, India 25.24052, 91.68183
25 Risa forest, East Khasi Hills district, Meghalaya, India 25.55615, 91.89389
26 Malki forest, East Khasi Hills district, Meghalaya, India 25.55602, 91.88678
27 Narpuh Wildlife Sanctuary, East Jaintia Hills district, Meghalaya, India 25.11062, 92.37215
28 Lakhicherra, Cachar district, Assam, India 24.97502, 92.77305
29 Darlawn, Aizawl district, Mizoram, India 24.01611, 92.92905
30 Reiek, Mamit district, Mizoram, India 23.69319, 92.60626
31 Ngengpui Wildlife Sanctuary, Lawngtlai district, Mizoram, India 22.49004, 92.75874
* Site details obtained from Liu et al. 2021

Molecular analyses

We extracted genomic DNA from liver tissue samples stored in absolute ethanol at –20°C, using the DNeasy (Qiagen) blood and tissue kit. We amplified the partial fragment (~1100 base pairs) of the mitochondrial NADH dehydrogenase subunit 2 (ND2) gene, for a total of 21 specimens using the following primers: MetF1 and H5934 (Macey et al. 1997). Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) conditions were as described in Boruah et al. (2024). All sequences were deposited in DNA Data Bank of Japan (DDBJ) with the registration numbers LC897088–LC897108 (Table 2). Bidirectional sequences were manually checked using the CHROMAS v.2.6.6 software (http://technelysium.com.au/wp/chromas) and aligned using ClustalW (Thompson et al. 1994) with default prior settings implemented in MEGA v.7 (Kumar et al. 2016). We checked for unexpected stop codons by translating the sequence to amino acids in MEGA v.7 (Kumar et al. 2016). The new sequences generated in this study were aligned with six sequences of Ptyctolaemus deposited in GenBank. Draco blanfordii Boulenger, 1885 was used as an outgroup (Table 2). Uncorrected P-distances based on ND2 were calculated using pairwise deletion in MEGA v.7 (Kumar et al. 2016).

Table 2.

Mitochondrial ND2 sequences generated and other GenBank sequences used to build phylogenies.

Species Voucher number Locality Accession number Reference
Ptyctolaemusgularis KIZ016452 Medog, Tibet, China MK001393 Wang et al. (2019)
Ptyctolaemusgularis KIZ06654 Medog, Tibet, China MW111456 Xu et al. (2021)
Ptyctolaemusgularis KIZ09947 Medog, Tibet, China MW133374 Che et al. (2021)
Ptyctolaemus sp. CAS 221515 Putao, Kachin, Myanmar AY555838 Schulte et al. (2004)
Ptyctolaemus chindwinensis SEABRI 2019120076 Htamanthi, Sagaing, Myanmar OK563731 Liu et al. (2021)
Ptyctolaemus collicristatus USNM 559811 Min Dat, Chin, Myanmar AY555837 Schulte et al. (2004)
Draco blanfordii MVZ 222156 An Khe, Gia Lai, Vietnam AF128477 Macey et al. (1997)
Ptyctolaemus namdaphaensis sp. nov. WII-ADR1403 14–15 Mile, Namdapha Tiger Reserve, Changlang district, Arunachal Pradesh, India LC897099 This study
Ptyctolaemus namdaphaensis sp. nov. WII-ADR1409 18–19 Mile, Namdapha Tiger Reserve, Changlang district, Arunachal Pradesh, India LC897100 This study
Ptyctolaemus namdaphaensis sp. nov. WII-ADR1410 18–19 Mile, Namdapha Tiger Reserve, Changlang district, Arunachal Pradesh, India LC897101 This study
Ptyctolaemus namdaphaensis sp. nov. WII-ADR1411 18–19 Mile, Namdapha Tiger Reserve, Changlang district, Arunachal Pradesh, India LC897102 This study
Ptyctolaemus namdaphaensis sp. nov. WII-ADR1427 Kamala valley, Namdapha Tiger Reserve, Changlang district, Arunachal Pradesh, India LC897103 This study
Ptyctolaemus namdaphaensis sp. nov. WII-ADR3178 Gandhigram, Changlang district, Arunachal Pradesh, India LC897105 This study
Ptyctolaemus namdaphaensis sp. nov. WII-ADR3283 Haldibari, Namdapha Tiger Reserve, Changlang district, Arunachal Pradesh, India LC897104 This study
Ptyctolaemus namdaphaensis sp. nov. ZSI-R-29481 Kamala valley, Namdapha Tiger Reserve, Changlang district, Arunachal Pradesh, India LC897098 This study
Ptyctolaemus siangensis sp. nov. WII-ADR1176 Rottung, East Siang district, Arunachal Pradesh, India LC897107 This study
Ptyctolaemus siangensis sp. nov. WII-ADR1210 Pittung, Upper Siang district, Arunachal Pradesh, India LC897108 This study
Ptyctolaemus siangensis sp. nov. WII-ADR465 Potin, Lower Subansiri district, Arunachal Pradesh, India LC897106 This study
Ptyctolaemus gularis WII-ADR3292 40 Mile, Namdapha Tiger Reserve, Changlang district, Arunachal Pradesh, India LC897088 This study
Ptyctolaemus gularis WII-ADR3018 Kalai, Kamlang Tiger Reserve, Lohit district, Arunachal Pradesh, India LC897091 This study
Ptyctolaemus gularis WII-ADR1406 Motijheel Trail, Namdapha Tiger Reserve, Changlang district, Arunachal Pradesh, India LC897090 This study
Ptyctolaemus gularis WII-ADR1436 Daribokgre, East Garo Hills district, Meghalaya, India LC897093 This study
Ptyctolaemus gularis WII-ADR3180 Risa forest, Shillong, East Khasi Hills district, Meghalaya, India LC897092 This study
Ptyctolaemus gularis ZSI-R-29477 Narpuh Wildlife Sanctuary, East Jaintia Hills district, Meghalaya, India LC897094 This study
Ptyctolaemus gularis ADR1152 Teirei, Dampa Tiger Reserve, Mamit district, Mizoram, India LC897096 This study
Ptyctolaemus gularis ADR1054 Ngengpui Wildlife Sanctuary, Lawngtlai district, Mizoram, India LC897095 This study
Ptyctolaemus gularis WII-ADR3476 Lakhicherra, Cachar district, Assam, India LC897097 This study
Ptyctolaemus gularis WII-ADR3475 Jeypore, Dihing-Patkai National Park, Dibrugarh district, Assam, India LC897089 This study

We performed maximum likelihood analyses using the GUI version of the IQTREE (Nguyen et al. 2015), implemented in Phylosuite (Zhang et al. 2020). The dataset was partitioned by codon position and the best-fit models of sequence evolution for each partition suggested by Modelfinder (Kalyaanamoorthy et al. 2017) were: codon position 1 and 2: HKY+F+G4 and codon position 3: TN+F+G4. We assessed nodal support with 10,000 ultrafast bootstraps (Hoang et al. 2018). A Bayesian inference (BI) analysis was performed using the program MrBayes 3.2 (Ronquist et al. 2012), implemented in Phylosuite (Zhang et al. 2020), with default prior settings. The same dataset used for the maximum likelihood (ML) analysis was partitioned by codon position using PartitionFinder v1.1.1 (Lanfear et al. 2012) with default settings to find the best-fit model of sequence evolution. The best-fit model suggested by PartitionFinder was HKY+G for all the three partitions. Four separate runs were set up with eight Markov chains, each initiated from random trees and allowed to run for 10 million generations, sampling every 1000 generations. Analyses were terminated when the standard deviation of the split frequencies was less than 0.001, the first 25% of trees were discarded as burn-in, and trees were constructed using a 50% majority consensus rule. We obtained the ESS values using TRACER v1.6 (Rambaut et al. 2018) and confirmed the priors were greater than 200. Support for the internal branches for the ML and BI was quantified using 1000 pseudoreplicates (ultrafast bootstrap UFB) and posterior probability (PP), respectively. The resulting tree was edited in FigTree v.1.4.4 (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree).

Morphological data and statistical analyses

Morphometric characters were measured to the nearest 0.01 mm using a digital calliper (Mitutoyo 500-197-30), except for tail length, which was measured using thread and digital calliper. Morphometric and meristic characters were examined using an Olympus SZX10 microscope. Morphometric terminologies follow (Zug et al. 2006). The following measurements were taken: SVL (snout to vent length), TAL (tail length, from posterior border of cloacal opening to tip of tail), TH (tail height at the base of the tail), TW (maximum width at the base of the tail), TrunkL (trunk length from axilla to groin), PectW (pectoral width measured between left and right axilla), PelvW (pelvic width measured between left and right groin), HL (head length from posterior axis of the jaw to tip of the snout), HW (head width at its widest point), HD (head depth, dorsoventral distance from top of the head to underside of jaw at transverse plane intersecting posterior axis of jaw), JawW (jaw width, distance from left to right outer edge of jaw angles), IN (distance between anterodorsal most border of nares), IO (distance between anterodorsal most border of orbits), OD (maximum diameter of the orbit), EN (naris to eye distance, from posterior edge of naris to anterior edge of orbit), NS (nares to snout distance), SE (Snout to eye distance, from tip of the snout to anterior edge of orbit), Snt-Forl (distance between snout and anterior insertion of forelimb), UAL (upper arm length, distance from anterior insertion of forelimb to elbow), LAL (lower arm length, distance from elbow to distal end of wrist or just before underside of forefoot), FFL (forefoot length, from the wrist to the tip of the 4th finger, excluding the claw), FLL (forelimb length, UAL + LAL + FFL), HLL (hindlimb length, Femur + Crus + HFL), 4th Fing (length of finger taken from base to tip of the 4th toe, excluding the claw), Femur (upper leg length), Crus (crus length, from the knee to the heel), HFL (hind foot length, from the heel to the tip of the 4th toe, excluding the claw), 4th Toe (length of the toe, taken from base to tip of the 4th toe, excluding the claw). Morphometric characters measured are presented in ­Table 3 and Table S4.

Table 3.

Summary of morphometric measurements of Ptyctolaemus species, means and range are provided in brackets. Data for Ptyctolaemus collicristatus and P. chindwinensis were collated from Schulte et al (2004) and Liu et al (2021). *One sample with a broken tail was excluded in this summary. Sample size for each sex provided in brackets. Abbreviations, see “Materials and methods” section. “NA” indicates missing data.

Characters P. gularis P. siangensis sp. nov. P. namdaphaensis sp. nov. P. chindwinensis (♂ = 3, ♀ = 1) P. collicristatus (♂ = 5, ♀ = 2)
Male (n = 7) Female (n = 18) Male (n = 2) Female (n = 3) Male (n = 8) Female (n = 7)
SVL 72.29 (62.59–79.24) 65.67 (46.67–76.29) 72.29 (66.9–77.68) 62.77 (58.03–66.62) 61.02625 (45.99–81.22) 68.36 (55.44–72.85) 67.70 (45.6–83.5) 80.27 (71.1–91.3)
TAL 158.88 (131.31–181.23) 146.35 (101.32–166.15) 173.76 (157.56–189.96) 148.49 (140.75–153.95) 141.1775 (115.61–184.47) 167.90 (131.84–180.95) 161.25 (102–206) 162.29 (137–182)
SVL/TAL 0.46 (0.42–0.49) 0.45 (0.42–0.5) 0.42 (0.41–0.42) 0.42 (0.41–0.44) 0.44 (0.40–0.66) 0.41 (0.38–0.42) 0.42 (0.41–0.45) 0.50 (0.47–0.56)
TAL/SVL 2.20 (2.04–2.4) 2.23 (1.99–2.38) 2.40 (2.36–2.45) 2.37 (2.26–2.43) 2.35 (1.52–2.51) 2.45 (2.37–2.62) NA NA
TH 6.21 (4.41–7.27) 4.61 (2.9–6.38) 5.775 (5.66–5.89) 4.63 (4.22–4.86) 4.84 (3.32–6.48) 5.36 (4.24–6.08) NA NA
TW 6.33 (4.86–7.02) 5.50 (3.91–7.13) 6.07 (5.32–6.82) 5.13 (4.83–5.35) 5.04 (3.14–8.68) 6.05 (4.52–6.89) NA NA
TrunkL 33.42 (28.22–36.91) 31.74 (21.9–39.97) 37.22 (35.41–39.03) 29.57 (25.65–31.6) 28.34 (21.89–36.44) 33.81 (27.41–37.14) 32.20 (21.4–38.4) NA
PectW 9.43 (5.88–11.06) 8.58 (6.5–11.13) 8.915 (8.52–9.31) 7.89 (6.87–8.62) 7.86 (5.83–11.93) 9.48 (8.02–10.56) NA NA
PelvW 7.55 (6.42–8.72) 7.21 (4.79–9.56) 6.705 (6.59–6.82) 6.17 (5.09–6.85) 6.16 (4.1–9.63) 7.37 (5.61–8.52) NA NA
HL 20.34 (17.17–22.15) 18.72 (13.56–22.61) 20.265 (19.52–21.01) 18.12 (16.36–19.13) 17.79 (13.55–25.06) 19.68 (16.19–20.98) 19.18 (13.7–23.3) 22.13 (19.9–24.7)
HW 10.55 (8.07–12.43) 9.03 (6.3–11.41) 9.66 (8.98–10.34) 9.09 (8.31–9.98) 8.50 (6.2–13.62) 9.51 (8.36–10.35) 11.23 (8.6–12.8) 11.81 (10.9–13.2)
HW/HL 0.52 (0.47–0.59) 0.48 (0.43–0.54) 0.48 (0.46–0.49) 0.51 (0.43–0.61) 0.47 (0.44–0.54) 0.48 (0.45–0.52) 0.59 (0.55–0.63) 0.53 (0.52–0.55)
HD 10.67 (8.94–11.57) 9.62 (7.4–11.65) 10.41 (10.34–10.48) 9.34 (8.72–9.89) 8.96 (7.34–12.89) 9.93 (8.7–11.22) NA NA
JawW 11.26 (9.27–12.18) 10.20 (7.72–11.83) 10.165 (10.03–10.3) 9.50 (9.26–9.77) 9.68 (7.54–13.98) 10.70 (9.42–11.45) NA NA
IN 4.11 (3.66–4.75) 3.56 (2.72–4.16) 3.8 (3.62–3.98) 3.40 (3.06–3.69) 3.56 (2.83–5.25) 3.55 (3.17–3.75) NA NA
IO 7.42 (5.98–8.93) 6.51 (5–7.67) 7.06 (6.77–7.35) 6.60 (6.23–6.99) 6.20 (4.78–8.82) 6.72 (5.54–7.4) NA NA
OD 4.30 (3.64–4.9) 3.95 (3.01–4.6) 4.92 (4.46–5.38) 3.84 (3.74–3.98) 4.22 (3.37–5.58) 4.4 (3.86–4.84) 6.43 (5.1–7.2) 6.00
EN 6.13 (4.66–7.63) 5.54 (3.81–7.28) 5.485 (5.27–5.7) 5.41 (4.89–5.88) 5.49 (4.4–7.99) 5.73 (4.42–6.2) 5.9 6.7
OD/EN 0.72 (0.51–0.87) 0.72 (0.57–0.86) 0.90 (0.85–0.94) 0.72 (0.65–0.81) 0.77 (0.70–0.89) 0.77 (0.67–0.87) NA NA
NS 2.77 (2.35–3.17) 2.26 (1.58–2.83) 2.61 (2.48–2.74) 2.14 (1.97–2.3) 2.24 (1.89–3.06) 2.46 (2.27–2.6) NA NA
SE 9.09 (7.08–10.79) 8.04 (5.89–9.89) 8.635 (8.32–8.95) 7.57 (6.51–8.11) 7.74 (6.17–10.96) 8.43 (6.76–9.26) 9.6 10.6
UAL 10.65 (8.4–12.35) 9.30 (6.33–10.97) 9.965 (9.39–10.54) 9.25 (9.08–9.39) 9.46 (7.49–12.7) 10.57 (8.9–11.66) NA NA
LAL 11.61 (9.1–13.21) 10.38 (7.07–11.72) 10.825 (10.38–11.27) 9.92 (9.67–10.42) 10.31 (7.85–14.27) 12.11 (10–13.02) NA NA
UAL/LAL 0.92 (0.84–1.11) 0.90 (0.84–1.01) 0.92 (0.90–0.94) 0.93 (0.89–0.97) 0.92 (0.84–0.97) 0.87 (0.81–0.94) NA NA
FFL 11.95 (10.1–14.25) 11.33 (8.22–12.79) 11.615 (11.08–12.15) 11.64 (11.29–12.11) 11.86 (8.21–16.37) 13.42 (11.24–14.68) NA NA
FLL 34.97 (29.3–40.25) 31.91 (22.52–35.74) 33.32 (32.82–33.83) 31.75 (30.98–32.71) 32.55 (24.61–43.38) 36.97 (31.03–38.68) 33.70 (23.8–39.8) 33.63 (30.2–36.1)
FLL/SVL 0.48 (0.45–0.52) 0.49 (0.43–0.55) 0.46 (0.44–0.49) 0.51 (0.49–0.54) 0.53 (0.50–0.58) 0.54 (0.51–0.57) 0.50 (0.48–0.52) 0.42 (0.40–0.45)
4th Fing 7.69 (6.87–8.44) 6.81 (4.76–8.21) 7.555 (6.99–8.12) 6.69 (6.26–7.13) 7.41 (4.97–11.03) 7.72 (6.55–8.43) NA NA
Femur 17.75 (14.83–19.84) 16.02 (11–18.79) 17.945 (17.32–18.57) 16.03 (15.33–16.4) 16.72 (12.92–22.35) 18.22 (15.54–19.39) NA NA
Crus 16.91 (13.69–18.96) 15.50 (10.35–17.86) 17.09 (16.78–17.4) 15.35 (14.39–15.89) 16.82 (12.49–22.15) 18.86 (16.11–19.85) NA NA
Femur/Crus 1.05 (0.95–1.22) 1.03 (0.97–1.08) 1.05 (1.03–1.07) 1.04 (1.03–1.07) 1.00 (0.93–1.03) 0.97 (0.94–1.01) NA NA
HFL 23.30 (17.73–26.43) 20.94 (14.42–22.49) 23.39 (23.13–23.64) 21.86 (21.31–22.28) 22.57 (17.15–29.71) 24.77 (22.14–26.12) NA NA
HLL 59.37 (50.12–66.03) 53.49 (36.83–59.86) 65.98 (64.22–67.73) 59.93 (57.72–61.69) 57.10 (43.59–75.22) 62.82 (54.75–65.515) 62.23 (42.3–74.8) 55.31 (49.8–58.8)
HLL/SVL 0.80 (0.7–0.89) 0.82 (0.74–0.9) 0.92 (0.87–0.96) 0.96 (0.93–0.99) 0.93 (0.88–0.99) 0.92 (0.87–0.99) 0.92 (0.90–0.94) 0.69 (0.64–0.73)
4th Toe 12.86 (8.32–16.2) 11.86 (7.97–12.84) 13.14 (13.03–13.24) 12.26 (11.99–12.55) 13.37 (9.72–17.81) 13.97 (12.19–15.93) NA NA
Snt-Forl 31.93 (25.17–36.41) 27.90 (19.16–31.7) 31.25 (27.84–34.66) 27.64 (27.1–28.05) 27.24 (19.47–39.24) 29.22 (22.73–30.9) NA NA

Fourteen meristic characters were taken: 1) CanthR (canthus rostralis, number of elongate scales along the dorsolateral snout ridge from the posterodorsal corner of nasal scale to the posteriormost supraciliary scale), 2) Suplab (supralabials, posterior end defined by posteriormost enlarged scales touching the infralabial at rear corner of the mouth), 3) Inflab (infralabials, posterior end defined by posteriormost enlarged scales that touches the supralabial at the rear corner of mouth), 4) SnS (snout scales, number of scales on line transversally between left and right nasal scales), 5) MBS (number of scale rows at midbody), 6) 4FL (fourth finger lamellae, number of lamellae, from 1st transversely enlarged lamellae at the base of digit to distal most lamellae), 7) 4TL (fourth toe lamellae, number of fourth toe lamellae, from the 1st lamella at the base of the digit to the distal most lamellae), 8) NC (nuchal crest, number of spines forming the nuchal crest), 9) VentSR (ventral scales counted from the posterior of post mental to the level directly above of cloacal opening), 10) VTSR (number of vertebral scales, counted from first nuchal scale to the level directly above the cloacal opening), 11) HeadSLn dorsal head scales (number of scales counted longitudinally on the midline between the interparietal and rostral scales), 12) POS (number of enlarged conical scales on the post-occipital region), 13) PTY (number of enlarged conical scales on the post-tympanic region) and 14) PRS (number of enlarged conical scales on the post-rictal region). Bilateral scale counts separated by a comma are given in left, right order. A summary of the meristic data is provided in ­Tables 4 and S5.

Table 4.

Summary of meristic characters of Ptyctolaemus spp. Abbreviations, see “Materials and methods” section. “NA” indicates missing data.

Characters P. gularis (♂ = 7, ♀ = 18) P. siangensis sp. nov. (♂ = 2, ♀ = 3) P. namdaphaensis sp. nov. (♂ = 8, ♀ = 7) P. chindwinensis (♂ = 3, ♀ = 1) P. collicristatus (♂ = 5, ♀ = 2)
Suplab 6–10 7–9 7–10 9–11 7–9
Inflab 6–10 8–9 7–10 8–10 7–9
VentSR 114–142 132–148 116–138 67–80* 64–84*
VTSR 79–114 89–114 73–110 89–97 NA
4FL 19–24 18–27 21–26 NA NA
4TL 27–37 30–31 32–40 31–35 28–34
POS 1–9 2–4 2–7 NA NA
PTY 1–7 3–6 3–7 NA NA
PRS 1–5 1–5 1–4 NA NA
SnS 3–8 5–6 4–7 NA NA
NC 14–29 18–24 13–25 26–29 15–16
CanthR 12–15 13–14 11–16 NA NA
MBS 71–101 86–105 90–106 101–113 76–87
HeadSLn 15–21 17–21 18–22 NA NA
*Posterior of gular to anterior opening of cloaca

Morphological data were analysed in software R (R Core Team 2021) with the package ggplot2 used to prepare plots (Wickham 2009). Some of the diagnostic characters and measurements for P. collicristatus and P. chindwinensis presented in the original descriptions (Schulte and Vindum 2004; Liu et al. 2021) were used for comparison with the new species described here. Morphometric differences and similarity between the populations were tested using a Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Linear Discriminant Function analysis (DFA). We used 28 morphometric variables for the PCA. The dataset used for the PCA and DFA comprised 42 individuals (excluding two juveniles): Ptyctolaemus siangensis sp. nov. from west of Siang River (5), Ptyctolaemus namdaphaensis sp. nov. from Changlang (13), and P. gularis (24). We used the GroupStruct R package (Chan and Grismer 2022) to calculate and account for allometric effects in the morphometric dataset, following the allometric equations described by Thorpe (1975, 1983). R package MASS (Venables and Ripley 2002) was used to carry out the DFA analysis. Each of the 28 variables was tested for normality using the Shapiro-Wilk normality test. Twenty out of the 28 measurements were normally distributed and these 20 variables were used for the DFA analysis (Table S2).

Results

Phylogenetic analyses

The ND2 dataset analysed was 959 base pairs in length with 349 parsimony informative, 477 conserved and 482 variable sites. Both maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference analyses yielded the same topology (Fig. 2). Our analyses revealed three clades of Ptyctolaemus, with P. collicristatus forming the basal clade, Clade A includes P. gularis sensu stricto and an undescribed lineage from northern slope of Arunachal Pradesh, India and Tibet. Clade B includes P. chindwinensis and one undescribed lineage each from southeastern Arunachal Pradesh, India and from Myanmar. In addition, the analyses suggested presence of three distinct lineages in India which includes P. gularis sensu stricto and one undescribed lineage each from Clade A and Clade B are well supported by both ML (86) and BI (0.95). The present analysis showed that P. gularis sensu stricto is distributed across south of the Brahmaputra River valley to the eastern part of the valley (Fig. 1). While Ptyctolaemus aff. gularis from Tibet (Che et al. 2020) and samples from west of the Siang River in Arunachal Pradesh were grouped together and revealed as an undescribed lineage. Together, these samples form a sister relationship with P. gularis sensu stricto (UFB 99, PP 1). Ptyctolaemus chindwinensis formed a sister relationship with an undescribed lineage from southeastern Arunachal Pradesh with moderate to high support (UFB 87, PP 0.93).

Figure 2. 

Maximum likelihood phylogeny of Ptyctolaemus based on the ND2 gene. The values at internal branches are ML bootstrap and Bayesian PP values on the left and right respectively. Scale bar = substitutions per site. Outgroup is not shown.

The uncorrected p–distance between P. gularis sensu stricto and P. siangensis sp. nov. from Tibet and Arunachal Pradesh, India is 13.9–16.0%. The uncorrected p–distance between P. chindwinensis and P. namdaphaensis sp. nov. is 8.2–9.5% (Tables 5, S6).

Table 5.

Uncorrected mean p-distance (range in %) among the Ptyctolaemus species included in this study. Numbers in brackets after the species names indicate sample size. In bold, within taxon divergences.

Species (sample size) P. gularis P. namdaphaensis sp. nov. P. siangensis sp. nov. Ptyctolaemus sp. P. chindwinensis
P. gularis (10) 2.0 (0.0–6.0)
P. namdaphaensis sp. nov. (8) 24.0 (22.0–24.9) 1.0 (0.1–1.9)
P. siangensis sp. nov. (6) 15.0 (13.9–16.0) 25.0 (24.4–26.2) 2.0 (0.0–4.1)
Ptyctolaemus sp. (Myanmar) (1) 23.0 (21.1–23.2) 9.0 (8.9–9.6) 24.0 (23.8–25.4)
P. chindwinensis (1) 24.0 (22.6–24.4) 9.0 (8.2–9.5) 25.0 (24.9–26.3) 9.0
P. collicristatus (1) 23.0 (21.9–23.3) 26.0 (26.1–26.7) 25.0 (23.9–25.5) 25.0 26.0

Morphological Comparisons

Multivariate analyses: Principal component analysis using 28 different morphometric variables revealed the spread of morphological variation between the three lineages of Ptyctolaemus from India. Where there was overlap between the three clusters (Fig. 3A, B), the first four axes explained 30.82%, 17.5%, 8.04% and 6.72% respectively. Factor loadings for the PCA analysis is presented in Table S1 and the variation between PC1–PC8 is plotted in Figure S1 In the Discriminant Function Analysis (DFA), the first nine axes explained 85% variance in the dataset and there were three distinct clusters with overlap between P. siangensis sp. nov. and P. gularis. The holotype of P. gularis (ZMB 5004) is placed well within the morphospace of the widespread lineage found across Meghalaya, Mizoram, Assam and Arunachal Pradesh states (Figs 3B, 4). Ptyctolaemus gularis being a widespread species occurring in different habitats have more variation in morphospace compared to the other two species with restricted distribution (Figs 3, 4). Morphospaces of the three distinct genetic lineages overlap irrespective of the sexes, some level of separation is observed between P. siangensis sp. nov. and P. namdaphaensis sp. nov. (Fig. S1).

Figure 3. 

Principal Component analysis results showing overlap in morphometric characters between the three species of Ptyctolaemus found in northeast India. A PC1 plotted against PC2, B PC3 plotted against PC4. Explained variables for each axis are provided in Table S1.

Figure 4. 

Discriminant function analysis showing morphospace (dis)similarity between the three species of Ptyctolaemus found in northeast India.

Body ratios: Ptyctolaemus chindwinensis and P. collicristatus have relatively broad heads compared to P. gularis, P. namdaphaensis sp. nov. and P. siangensis sp. nov. (Fig. 5). Ptyctolaemus collicristatus have a relatively short tail compared to the other four species. Ptyctolaemus collicristatus has relatively shorter forelimb length compared to Ptyctolaemus chindwinensis and P. namdaphaensis sp. nov. with some overlap with P. gularis and P. siangensis sp. nov. Hindlimb length is relatively longer for P. chindwinensis compared to other four species, it is shortest in P. collicristatus. The number of midbody scale rows and nuchal crest scales varies among the five species, with P. chindwinensis having the highest number of midbody scale rows. Ptyctolaemus collicristatus have a consistently lower number of nuchal crest scales in males compared to the other four species (Fig. 5).

Figure 5. 

Visualisation (violin plot superimposed on a box plot) of body and head size ratios and meristic data of Ptyctolaemus species. Abbreviations: head width (HW), head length (HL), snout-vent length (SVL), tail length (TAL), forelimb length (FLL) and hindlimb length (HLL). Nuchal crest scales plotted only for males.

Taxonomic account

Ptyctolaemus gularis (Peters, 1864)

Chresonymy. Otocryptis (Ptyctolaemus) gularis Peters, 1864: 386.

Holotype.

ZMB 5004, from “Calcutta” [in error], purchased from J. G. W. Brandt; Figure 6.

Remarks.

The type specimen, whose origin was given as “Calcutta”, was acquired by the Zoologisches Museum Berlin in the middle of the 19th century from Johann Georg Wilhelm Brandt (1794–1856), a dealer in natural history objects in Hamburg, Germany. The two additional specimens in the Museum für Naturkunde Berlin (ZMB 31134–31135) are non-types collected from “Margherita, in the Patkai Hills, Upper Assam” by Ernst Hartert in the fall of 1888. The Reptile Database (Uetz et al. 2025) lists these specimens under “Types” as “additional material” along with the holotype and refer to Ananjeva and Stuart (2001) even though Denzer et al (1997) did not list these two specimens as types. However, these two specimens are not linked to the type in any way. Given the absence of Ptyctolaemus from Kolkata (Calcutta) and the morphological similarity of the type specimen to specimens from Meghalaya, we suspect that type could have been collected from Shillong, Meghalaya.

Referred specimens.

Three adult females (WII-ADR3479, WII-ADR3480 and WII-ADR3481) collected from Risa forest (25.55615°N 91.89389°E, elevation 1670 m a.s.l.), Shillong, East Khasi Hills district, Meghalaya, India collected on 30 June 2016 by Abhijit Das, Bitupan Boruah and V. Deepak; one adult female (ZSI-R-29477) collected from Narpuh Wildlife Sanctuary (25.11062°N 92.37215°E, elevation 70 m a.s.l.), East Jaintia Hills district, Meghalaya, India, collected on 30 May 2022 by Abhijit Das and Bitupan Boruah; one adult male (WII-ADR3180) from Risa Forest (25.55615°N 91.89389°E, elevation 1670 m a.s.l.), Shillong, East Khasi hills District, Meghalaya, India, collected on 23 May 2022 by Abhijit Das and Bitupan Boruah; one adult male (WII-ADR1436) from Daribokgre (25.49675°N 90.32742°E, elevation 1120 m a.s.l.), Nokrek, Meghalaya, India, collected on 25 May 2022 by Abhijit Das, Bitupan Boruah and Vijayan Jithin; one adult male (WII-ADR108) from Tyrna (25.24052°N, 91.68183°E, elevation 750 m a.sl.), East Khasi Hills district, Meghalaya, India, collected on 17 September 2017 by Vivek Sarkar; one adult male (ZSI-R-29478) from Malki forest (25.55602°N, 91.88678°E, elevation 1705 m a.s.l.), Shillong, East Khasi Hills district, Meghalaya, India, collected on 5 June 2024 by Abhijit Das, Isaac Rayen and Asim Bashir; one adult female (WII-ADR1054) from Ngengpui Wildlife Sanctuary, (22.49004°N, 92.75874°E, elevation 220 m a.s.l.) Lawngtlai district, Mizoram, India, collected on 7 September 2021 by Abhijit Das and Bitupan Boruah; one adult female (WII-ADR1152) from Teirei, Dampa Tiger Reserve, Mamit district, Mizoram, India, collected on 16 September 2021 by Abhijit Das and Bitupan Boruah; one adult male (WII-ADR3477) and one adult female (WII-ADR3478) from Darlawn (24.01611°N, 92.92905°E, elevation 1071 m a.s.l.), Aizawl district, Mizoram, India, collected on 24 August 2021 by Samuel Lalronunga, Isaac Zosangliana and Malsawmdawngliana; one adult male (WII-ADR3482) and three adult females (WII-ADR3483–WII-ADR3485) from Reiek (23.69319°N, 92.60626°E, elevation 1255 m a.s.l.), Aizawl district, Mizoram, India, collected on 25 September 2018 by Samuel Lalronunga and Lalhmangaiha Khiangte; one adult female (WII-ADR3018) from Kalai (27.72294°N, 96.4346°E, elevation 1110 m a.s.l.), Kamlang Tiger Reserve, Lohit district, Arunachal Pradesh, India, collected on 3 October 2022 by Abhijit Das, Bitupan Boruah and Naitik G. Patel; one adult female (WII-ADR3473) from Kalai (27.72294°N, 96.4346°E, elevation 1110 m a.s.l.), Kamlang Tiger Reserve, Lohit district, Arunachal Pradesh, India, collected on 20 July 2023 by Abhijit Das, Rajiv N.V. and Jason D. Gerard; one adult female (WII-ADR1450) from 18 Mile (27.49548°N, 96.3919°E, elevation 440 m a.s.l.), Namdapha Tiger Reserve, Changlang district, Arunachal Pradesh, India, collected on 20 May 2022 by Abhijit Das and Bitupan Boruah; one adult female (WII-ADR1782) from Sally Lake (28.16814°N, 95.83751°E, elevation 520 m a.s.l.), Mehao Wildlife Sanctuary, Lower Dibang valley district, Arunachal Pradesh, India, collected on 12 August 2022 by Bitupan Boruah; one adult female (WII-ADR3292) from 40 Mile (27.48789°N, 96.54165°E, elevation 470 m a.s.l.), Namdapha Tiger Reserve, Changlang district, Arunachal Pradesh, India, collected on 27 May 2023 by Abhijit Das, Rajiv N.V. and Sourav Dutta; one adult female (WII-ADR1407) from Deban (27.49445°N 96.39022°E, elevation 460 m a.s.l.), Namdapha TR, Changlang district, Arunachal Pradesh, India, collected on 12 May 2022 by Abhijit Das and Bitupan Boruah; one adult female (WII-ADR1406) from Motijheel Trail (27.49624°N 96.33304°E, elevation 405 m a.s.l.), Namdapha Tiger Reserve, Changlang district, Arunachal Pradesh, India, collected on 13 May 2022 by Abhijit Das and Bitupan Boruah.

Redescription of the holotype.

ZMB 5004 (Fig. 6), an adult male with SVL 65.7 mm and TAL 153 mm; tail length more than twice of snout-vent length (TAL/SVL = 2.33). Head distinct from neck, head longer than wide (HW/HL = 0.59), slightly concave on top; rostral scale crescent, snout rounded; pupil rounded, scales on loreal region slightly keeled, surrounded by heterogeneous scales; nasal separated from rostral by one scale; canthus rostralis sharp, strongly keeled with 14 enlarged scales on each side; the keels gradually reduces towards snout; nostrils rounded, positioned slightly towards lateral side, in contact with first supralabials; snout scales irregular in shape and size, series of seven enlarged, keeled scales on the snout form an inverted “Y”-shaped pattern, with the first three anterior scales aligned along the midline and pointed posteriorly; head height 11.04 mm; scales on head, snout and interorbital region heterogenous in size and shape; tympanum hidden and covered with smooth scales; neck region with overlapping small scales interspersed with enlarged scales and are large towards the trunk; in the temporal region three enlarged, keeled, and elevated scales positioned posterior; scales around orbital region small and irregular in shape; parietal eye not distinct; scales on anterior region of gular pouch smaller than the middle region, heterogeneous in size feebly keeled and mucronate, the scales in middle region are larger than those of anterior and posterior region; three distinct raised gular folds on either side of midline; folds curved towards midline posteriorly, scales on the inner folds are granular; nine supralabials on both sides; ten infralabials on left and nine on right; nuchal crest poorly developed with 25 conical scales (Tables S4, S5).

Figure 6. 

Holotype of Ptyctolaemus gularis (ZMB 5004). A Lateral view; B dorsal view; C ventral view; D lateral view of head; E dorsal view of head; F ventral view of head. Scale bar= 10 mm.

Mental scale triangular, broader than long, and slightly narrower than the rostral; bordered posteriorly by one infralabial on each side and two enlarged postmentals in contact with the first infralabials; postmentals medially separated by a single small gular scale; four chin shields present on each side, positioned parallel to the infralabials; the anterior portion of the first chin shield contacts the first infralabial, while the remaining part of the first and second chin shields separated from infralabial by one intervening scale row, while subsequent two chin shields separated from the infralabials by two intervening scale row; scales in the anterior region of gular feebly keeled.

Habitus slender, slightly compressed, dorsal scales keeled, imbricate, posteriorly pointed; mid-dorsal scale row strongly keeled, enlarged scales appearing discontinuously; lateral scales heterogeneous in size, mostly smaller than the dorsal, slightly keeled, imbricate, and interspersed with enlarged, strongly keeled scales; 99 vertebral scales (VTSR), 93 rows of scales around the midbody; ventral scales 135, larger than the lateral scales and approximately equal to the enlarged dorsal scales, strongly keeled, imbricate, and pointed backward.

Limbs slender, moderate sized, scales on dorsal surface strongly keeled, imbricate scales, lower arm slightly longer than the upper arm (UAL/LAL = 1.11); thigh length approximately equal to crus length (femur/crus = 1.22); scales on dorsal surface of the forelimbs strongly keeled, uniform and imbricate; scales on dorsal side of the hindlimb slightly enlarged, keeled and imbricate; scales on ventral side of the hindlimb smaller than the dorsal, slightly keeled and imbricate; relative length of digits: IV>III>II>V>I; relative length of toes: IV>III>V>II>I; 33/34 bicarinate subdigital lamellae under fourth toe.

Tail rounded in cross section, slightly compressed laterally, thick at the base, covered with homogeneous scales on the dorsal and ventral surface arranged regularly, strongly keeled and imbricate.

Colouration in preservative.

Dorsal surface of head brown; lateral side of head light-brown; lips pale-brown coloured; paravertebral region with feeble irregular shaped greyish patches; feeble greyish indistinct patch on lateral region; limbs brown with dark brown or greyish patches; radial stripes around the eye indistinct except for two below the eye; inner folds of gular black; ventral side of body light-brown with light-greyish spots; forelimb and hindlimbs slightly darker than the rest of the ventral region with brown light-grey; digits with indistinct bands; tail brown with indistinct greyish cross bands.

Morphological description based on newly collected materials (6 males, 18 females).

Morphometric and meristic characters are provided in Tables 3 and 4. Moderate-sized lizard, SVL 62.7–79.2 mm (male) and 46.7–76.3 mm (female); TAL 131.3–181.2 mm (male) and 101.3–166.2 mm (female); tail length more than twice the of snout-vent length (TAL/SVL = 2.0–2.4). Head distinct from neck, head longer than wide (HW/HL = 0.43–0.59), slightly concave on top; rostral scale crescent, snout rounded; pupil rounded, scales on loreal region slightly keeled, surrounded by heterogeneous scales; nasal separated from rostral by one scale; canthus rostralis sharp, strongly keeled with 12–15 enlarged scales on each side; the keels gradually reduces towards snout; nostrils rounded, positioned slightly towards lateral side, in contact with first supralabials; snout scales irregular in shape and size, series of 5–7 enlarged, keeled scales on the snout form an inverted “Y”-shaped pattern, with the first three anterior scales aligned along the midline and pointed posteriorly; head height 7. 4–11. 7 mm; scales on head, snout and interorbital region heterogenous; tympanum hidden and covered with smooth scales; neck region with overlapping small scales interspersed with enlarged scales and are large towards the trunk; three enlarged, keeled, and elevated scales positioned posterior and horizontal to orbit; scales around orbital region small and irregular in shape; parietal eye not distinct; gular in males distinct; scales on gular region smaller than the surrounding scales slightly heterogeneous in size feebly keeled and mucronate, the scales in middle region are larger than those of anterior and posterior region; three distinct raised gular folds on either side of midline; folds curved towards midline posteriorly (Fig. 7), scales on the inner folds are granular; 6–10 supralabials on left and 6–10 on right side; 7–10 infralabials on left and 6–10 on right side; nuchal crest poorly developed with 14–29 conical scales.

Figure 7. 

Gular fold arrangement in males of the three species of Ptyctolaemus found in India. Ptyctolaemus gularis A WII-ADR3477, B WII-ADR3180, C WII-ADR3482, D WII-ADR1436; P. siangensis sp. nov., E WII-ADR1210, F ZSI-R-29479, G WII-ADR1176, H WII-ADR2542 and P. namdaphaensis sp. nov., I WII-ADR3283, J WII-ADR3178, K.WII-ADR3061, L ZSI-R-29481. Scale bar = 10 mm.

Mental scale triangular, broader than long, and slightly narrower than the rostral; bordered posteriorly by one infralabial on each side and two enlarged postmentals in contact with the first infralabials; postmentals followed by 1–3 small gular scale; four chin shields present on each side, positioned parallel to the infralabials; the anterior portion of the first chin shield contacts the first infralabial, while the remaining part of the first and second chin shields separated from infralabial by one intervening scale row, while subsequent two chin shields separated from the infralabials by two intervening scale row; scales in the anterior region of gular feebly keeled.

Habitus slender, slightly compressed, dorsal scales keeled, imbricate, posteriorly pointed; mid-dorsal scale row strongly keeled, enlarged scales appearing discontinuously; lateral scales heterogeneous in size, mostly smaller than the dorsal, slightly keeled, imbricate, and interspersed with enlarged, strongly keeled scales; 79–114 dorsal scales (VTSR), 71–101 rows of scales around the midbody; ventral scales 114–142, larger than the lateral scales and approximately equal to the enlarged dorsal scales, strongly keeled, imbricate, and pointed backward.

Limbs slender, moderate sized, scales on dorsal surface strongly keeled, imbricate scales, lower arm slightly longer than the upper arm (UAL/LAL = 0.84–1.01); femur length approximately equal to crus length (femur/crus = 0.95–1.08); scales on dorsal surface of the forelimbs strongly keeled, uniform and imbricate; scales on dorsal side of the hindlimb slightly enlarged, keeled and imbricate; scales on ventral side of the hindlimb smaller than the dorsal, slightly keeled and imbricate; relative length of digits: IV>III>II>V>I; relative length of toes: IV>III>V>II>I; 29–40/27–36 bicarinate subdigital lamellae under fourth toe.

Tail rounded in cross section, slightly compressed laterally, thick at the base, covered with homogeneous scales on the dorsal and ventral surface arranged regularly, strongly keeled and imbricate.

Coloration in preservative.

Dorsal head golden brown; greyish-white blotch on the parietal region; lateral head light brown; nostril light-greyish; enlarged keeled scales on the posterior mandibular region light coloured; lips pale greyish coloured; body golden brown coloured; paravertebral region with scattered greyish patches; greyish indistinct patch on lateral region; limbs light brown with greyish patch; radial stripes around the eye indistinct; mental white to light golden brown; inner folds of gular dark coloured, midline of gular light golden brown coloured; ventral side of forelimb and body light yellow with light greyish patch, ventral side of hindlimb light grey coloured; digits with indistinct bands; tail golden brown with indistinct greyish cross bands; scales on gular region smaller than the surrounding scales slightly heterogenous in size and mucronate, the scales in middle region are larger than those of anterior and posterior region; three distinct raised gular folds on either side of midline; folds curved towards midline posteriorly, scales on the inner folds are granular (Fig. 6).

Expanded diagnosis based on newly collected materials.

A medium-sized agamid lizard, SVL 46.67–79.24 mm (n = 22), TAL 101.32–181.23 mm (n = 22). Nuchal crest is poorly developed, consisting of 14–29 nuchal scales. Supratympanic spines absent. Body laterally compressed, scales at the trunk heterogeneous in size, larger than ventrals, dorsally and posteriorly oriented, 79–114 dorsal scales (VTSR), 71–101 rows of scales at midbody, 114–142 ventrals. Mental smaller than chin shields, first pair of chin shields elongated and in midline contact, the gular scales at the midline are smaller than the adjacent scales away from the midline.

Colouration in life.

Colouration in life variable (Figs 810). Head primarily brown to dark brown intermixed with pale-brown scales, or intermixed with pale-green or yellowish green scales in some individuals; three pale-brown or pale-greenish brown bands on dorsal surface of head, first one concaved on snout followed by one diffused in front of the orbital region, third one broad, nearly bow shaped on interorbital region connecting the supraciliary scales; occipital region paler; supralabials and infralabials uniform brown or with dark-brown patches or anteriorly dark-brown and gradually paler towards angle of jaw forming a pale stripe, in some individuals this stripe colour pale-greenish; alternative dark-brown and pale-brown streaks radiating from eyes; these streaks may be diffused, or dark stripes may represent only by dark edges; one similar streak radiating from eye to angle of jaw; lateral side of neck pale-brown or pale-greenish or pale-yellowish green with dark-brown oblique streaks on neck and dark-brown reticulation on trunk; paravertebral region with irregular shaped enlarged dark-brown patches separated by pale-brown/pale-green narrow lines or rusty brown patches separated by greyish brown narrow patches; pale-yellow/greenish stripe may be present running parallel along the paravertebral region starting at neck and posteriorly diffused on trunk; dorsal surface of the limbs brown or dark-brown or greyish brown with irregular pale-brown lines; dorsally tail with alternative broad dark-brown and comparatively narrow pale-brown patches; lateral sides of tail base pale-brown or rusty brown; on ventral side, lower jaw pale brown with or without dark-brown lines; ground colour of gular region pale-brown or pale-bluish green or pale-yellowish green; three to four broad dark-blue stripes with lighter edge and separated by narrow light lines; edge of the dark-blue stripes irregular; belly pale-brown.

Figure 8. 

Variation in the live gular colour pattern in P. gularis. A Uncollected female from Namdapha Tiger Reserve, Arunachal Pradesh; B a female (WII-ADR3292) from Namdapha, Tiger Reserve, Arunachal Pradesh; C a female (WII-ADR3473) from Kamlang Tiger Reserve, Arunachal Pradesh; D a female (WII-ADR1152) from Dampa Tiger Reserve, Mizoram; E a male (WII-ADR1436) from Daribokgre, Garo Hills, Meghalaya; F a male (WII-ADR3180) from Shillong, Khasi Hills, Meghalaya.

Figure 9. 

Ptyctolaemus gularis in life. A An adult female from Malki forest, Shillong, Meghalaya; B, C different individuals of uncollected adult males from Barail WLS, Assam; D an uncollected subadult from Barail WLS, Assam; E an uncollected male from Shillong, Meghalaya; F WII-ADR1054 from Ngengpui WLS, Mizoram.

Figure 10. 

Ptyctolaemus gularis in life. A WII-ADR3180 from Shillong, Meghalaya; B WII-ADR3473 from Kamlang Tiger Reserve, Arunachal Pradesh; C WII-ADR1436 from Daribokgre, Meghalaya; D WII-ADR1406 from Namdapha Tiger Reserve, Arunachal Pradesh; E WII-ADR1152 from Dampa Tiger Reserve, Mizoram; F ZSI-R-29477 from Narpuh Wildlife Sanctuary, Meghalaya.

Natural history and distribution.

Ptyctolaemus gularis is a widely distributed agamid lizard inhabiting forested landscape of northeast India (Fig. 8). In Meghalaya, where it has been recorded from Khasi, Garo and Jaintia Hills from low lying areas (50 m) of Jaintia hills to ~1600 m in Shillong plateau (Fig. 11A, B). On 30 June 2016, we surveyed for agamid lizards in the areas adjoining Malki forest in Shillong between 10:00–13:00 hrs. We found six individuals of P. gularis, all were females and five were gravid females. The smallest female individual measured was 61.1 mm (SVL) and the largest was 79.9 mm (SVL). We caught and gently pressed the belly to find out the number of eggs in these individuals. The number of eggs in these individuals varied between 2, 5 and 7. During June 2016, in Malki forest we observed a gravid female making a pit on loose soil using its snout probably for laying eggs. In the Barail hills of southern Assam, it is found as low as 30 m to 900 m elevation. Subadult individuals were often recorded along the forest edges during May. One large male was detected on the trunk of a tree growing on a forested hill slope. During September two females were recorded along riparian vegetation showing dark crypsis. In Dampa Tiger Reserve, one Individual was seen in a bamboo dominated patch during 15 September 2021. This species is widely distributed in the mountains of northeast India across south of Brahmaputra valley and to the eastern part of the valley. The westernmost distribution limit of the species we recorded was the Garo hills and are distributed in the Mehao Wildlife Sanctuary, Arunachal Pradesh in the east (Fig. 1), and in the Ngengpui Wildlife Sanctuary, Mizoram in the south.

Figure 11. 

Habitat of Ptyctolaemus species in northeast India. A, B Habitat of P. gularis in Shillong, Khasi Hills, Meghalaya; C habitat of P. siangensis sp. nov. at Potin, Arunachal Pradesh; D habitat of P. namdaphaensis sp. nov. at Kamala valley, Namdapha Tiger Reserve, Arunachal Pradesh.

Ptyctolaemus siangensis sp. nov.

Figures 12, 13; Tables 3, 4

Chresonymy. Ptyctolaemus aff. gularisLiu et al. (2021)

Holotype.

WII-ADR1176, adult female, from Rottung (28.14114°N, 95.1562°E, elevation 390 m a.s.l.), East Siang district, Arunachal Pradesh, India, collected on 22 October 2021 by Bitupan Boruah.

Paratype.

WII-ADR1210, adult male, from Pittung (28.67146°N, 94.96159°E, elevation 415 m a.s.l.), Upper Siang district, Arunachal Pradesh, India, on 28 October 2021 by Bitupan Boruah; ZSI-R-29479, adult male, from Jengging (28.53543°N, 95.03106°E, elevation 945 m a.s.l.), Upper Siang district, Arunachal Pradesh, India, on 5 October 2018 by Abhijit Das; Figure S2.

Referred specimens.

WII-ADR2542, adult female, from Khellong (27.0035°N, 92.24502°E, elevation 2955 m a.s.l.), Eaglenest Wildlife Sanctuary, West Kameng district, Arunachal Pradesh, India, on 29 August 2022 by Krishnendu Banerjee; WII-ADR465, adult female, from Potin (27.34786°N, 93.8497°E, 580 m a.s.l.), Lower Subansiri district, Arunachal Pradesh, India, on 19 October 2019 by Abhijit Das and Bitupan Boruah.

Description of the holotype.

An adult female, SVL 63.65 mm and TAL 153.95 mm; TAL/SVL ratio 2.42; head distinct from neck, longer than wide (HW/HL = 0.48), slightly concave on top; rostral scale crescent; snout rounded, longer than orbital diameter (OD/EN = 0.65); pupil round, scales on the loreal region slightly keeled, surrounded by scales of irregular size and shape; nasal separated from rostral by one scale; canthus rostralis sharp, strongly keeled and consists 13 enlarged scales on each side; keels weak towards the snout; nostrils rounded, slightly laterally positioned, in contact with first supralabials; snout scales irregular in shape and size, series of six enlarged, keeled scales on the snout form an inverted “Y”-shaped pattern, with the first three anterior scales aligned along the midline and pointed posteriorly, posterior to the third scale, two scale on either side is oriented diagonally towards the superciliary ridge; head height at occipital region 9.89 mm; scales on head, snout and interorbital region heterogenous in shape and size; tympanum hidden and covered with smooth scales; neck region with small overlapping scales interspersed with enlarged scales that increase in size towards trunk; three enlarged, keeled, and elevated scales located posterior and horizontal to orbit; scales around orbital region small and irregular in shape; parietal eye is not distinct; gular in males distinct; scales on gular heterogeneous in size and mucronate, feebly keeled, scales in middle region larger than those on anterior and posterior region; three distinct raised gular folds on either side of midline; folds curved towards midline posteriorly (Fig. 7); nine supralabials on both sides; seven infralabials on left and eight on right; nuchal crest poorly developed, consisting of 14 conical scales (Tables S4, S5).

Mental scale triangular, broader than long, and slightly narrower than the rostral, bordered posteriorly by one infralabial on each side and two enlarged postmentals in contact with the first infralabials; postmentals followed by two small gular scale; four chin shields present on each side, positioned parallel to the infralabials; the anterior portion of the first chin shield contacts the first infralabial, while the remaining part of the first and the subsequent two chin shields separated from the infralabials by one intervening scale row; scales in the anterior gular region feebly keeled.

Habitus slender, slightly compressed, dorsal scales keeled, imbricate, and posteriorly pointed; mid-dorsal scale row strongly keeled, enlarged scales appearing discontinuously; lateral scales heterogeneous, mostly smaller than the dorsal, feebly keeled, imbricate, and interspersed with enlarged, strongly keeled scales; 89 dorsal scales (VTSR); 87 scales around midbody; 132 ventral scales, larger than lateral scales and approximately equal to the enlarged dorsal scales, strongly keeled, imbricate, posteriorly pointed.

Limbs are slender, moderate sized, dorsal surface covered in strongly keeled, imbricate scales; lower arm length slightly longer than the upper arm length (UAL/LAL = 0.94); femur length slightly longer than the crus length (femur/crus = 1.03); scales on dorsal surface of the forelimbs strongly keeled, uniform and imbricate; scales on ventral side of the forelimbs relatively smaller, feebly keeled; relative length of digits: IV > III > II > V > I; scales on dorsal side of the hindlimb slightly enlarged, keeled and imbricate; scales on ventral side of the hindlimb smaller than the dorsal, slightly keeled and imbricate; relative length of toes: IV > III > V > II > I; 30/30 subdigital lamellae under fourth toe and bicarinate.

Tail length more than twice of SVL, rounded, slightly compressed laterally, broader at the base, gradually tapering towards tip, covered with regularly arranged strongly keeled, imbricate and homogeneous scales.

Diagnosis.

A moderate-sized lizard, SVL 66.90–77.68 mm in male (n = 2) and SVL 58.03–66.62 mm in female (n = 3), TAL 157.56–189.96 mm in male (n = 2) and 140.75–153.95 mm in female (n = 3). Snout scales irregular in shape and size with an inverted Y-shaped pattern. Nuchal crest poorly developed with 14–24 conical scales. Body slightly compressed, scales at the trunk heterogeneous in size, smaller than the dorsal, slightly keeled, oriented backwards, 89–114 dorsal scales (VTSR), 86–105 rows of scales around midbody and 132–148 ventrals. Mental broader than long, postmentals medially separated by a single small gular scale, anterior region of the first chin shield contacts the first infralabial, gular with three distinct raised gular folds on either side of midline excluding the base, gular scales heterogeneous in size, feebly keeled, scales in middle region larger than those on anterior and posterior region.

Comparison.

Ptyctolaemus siangensis sp. nov. can be distinguished from Ptyctolaemus collicristatus by having relatively smaller SVL/TAL ratio 0.41–0.45 (vs. 0.47–0.56; Table 3), gular region with dark blue with white lines vs bright yellow medially with greenish-yellow and dark brown laterally; differs from Ptyctolaemus gularis by gular region with dark blue with white lines (vs. pale-brown or pale-bluish green or pale-yellowish green; three to four broad dark-blue stripes; Fig. 13); differs from Ptyctolaemus chindwinensis by relatively fewer scales on the nuchal crest 18–24 (vs. 26–29), gular region with dark blue with white lines vs bright yellow with two horizontal parallel black stripes (Fig. 13).

Morphological variation.

Details of morphometric and meristic variation among the type series are presented in Table S3–S4. The paratypes (WII ADR 1210, ZSI-R-29479) closely resemble the holotype in overall morphology, with the following distinctions. Paratype WII ADR 1210 has three scales posteriorly connected to the first pair of chin shield; series of seven enlarged, keeled scales on the snout form an inverted “Y”-shaped pattern, with the first three anterior scales aligned along the midline and pointed posteriorly, posterior to the third scale, two scale on either side is oriented diagonally towards the superciliary ridge; paravertebral region rusty brown coloured varied from that of holotype in preservation; ventral region with dark creamish brown to dark brown colours bordering the flank region; scattered dark brown spots on the mental region. Paratype ZSI-R-29479 has two scales posteriorly attached to the first pair of chin shield; scattered dark brown spots on the mental region; series of seven enlarged, keeled scales on the snout form an inverted “Y”-shaped pattern, with the first three anterior scales aligned along the midline and pointed posteriorly, posterior to the third scale, two scales on either side is oriented diagonally towards the superciliary ridge; ventral part of the thigh and tail with distinct brown patch scattered.

Colouration in life.

Dorsal and lateral colour variable (Fig. 13). Head pale-brown or dark-brown with intermixed pale-yellow scales, some scales with golden yellow keel; three light bands on dorsal surface of head, first concaved, second one diffused and third on interorbital space continuing to supraciliary scales; these bands varies from pale-brown to pale-greenish; lateral sides of head brown to dark-brown, paler towards lips; alternative dark-brown and pale-brown/pale-green streaks radiating from eyes; a dark streak from eye directing towards angle of jaw; lateral side of neck and trunk pale-yellowish brown to pale-green with dark-brown reticulation; lateral side of trunk may be rusty brown without reticulation in some individuals; dorsal surface of back brown with enlarged dark-brown or rusty brown patches; limbs on top dark-brown with pale-brown narrow irregular lines; tail with alternative broad dark-brown and comparatively pale-brown patches on dorsal surface; mental and ventral region creamish brown with ground colour on gular very pale-brownish white or bluish white with three broad dark-blue stripes separated by narrow light lines.

Colouration in preservatives.

Dorsal and lateral head light rusty brown; greyish cross band on interorbital region; nostril and labials greyish speckled; radiating lines around the orbit dark greyish; an oblique streak from posterior margin of orbit indistinct greyish color; lateral region of neck and body greyish colored; paravertebral region same as head; thigh and upper arm rusty brown; crus and lower arm with greyish blotches; digits with dark bands; mental light brownish cream to cream towards the gular with speckles; gular on the midline creamish white with dark streaks on the inner side of folds; ventral side of forelimb, hindlimb and body brownish cream with speckles throughout; tail rusty brown with greyish patch and indistinct light bands (Fig. 12).

Figure 12. 

Holotype of P. siangensis sp. nov. (WII-ADR1176) in preserved condition. A Dorsal, B ventral and C lateral views of the body and DE lateral, dorsal and ventral views of the head. Scale bar = 10 mm.

Figure 13. 

Ptyctolaemus siangensis sp. nov. showing variation in gular and/or body colouration; A, B Male (ZSI-R-29479) from Adi hills, Arunachal Pradesh; C, D female (WII-ADR465) from Potin, Arunachal Pradesh; E, F an uncollected male from Nameri National Park, Assam.

Sequence divergence.

Ptyctolaemus siangensis sp. nov. has high genetic divergence with its sister species P. gularis 13.9–16.0%. With other members of the genus, P. siangensis sp. nov. has 23.8–26.3% genetic difference (Table 5).

Etymology.

The specific epithet is a toponym derived from the name of the river “Siang” in the state of Arunachal Pradesh.

Common name.

Siang green fan-throated lizard

Natural history and distribution.

The holotype was found roosting on a branch of a small tree around two metres above the ground, alongside a fast-flowing hill stream at Rottung. One individual was recorded along roadside vegetation in Potin (Fig. 11C). This species is currently known from west of Siang River and north of Brahmaputra valley in Arunachal Pradesh. We recorded the species at Rottung, Mouling National Park to Tuting in Adi hills, Potin to Eaglenest Wildlife Sanctuary in the western Arunachal Pradesh, Nameri Tiger Reserve in Assam. In addition, the published sequence from Medog, China is nested within P. siangensis samples. Thus, this species also occurs in Medog, China. The report of P. gularis from Royal Manas National Park, Bhutan (Das et al. 2016) is most likely of P. siangensis sp. nov. but requires further verification.

Ptyctolaemus namdaphaensis sp. nov.

Figures 14, 15, 16, Tables 3, 4

Holotype.

WII-ADR3178, adult male, from Gandhigram (27.26515°N, 96.93878°E, elevation 1135 m a.s.l.), Changlang district, Arunachal Pradesh India, collected on 17 September 2022 by Abhijit Das and Bitupan Boruah.

Paratype.

an adult female (WII-ADR3179), collected with the holotype from the same locality as of the holotype by Abhijit Das and Bitupan Boruah; an adult female (ZSI-R-29480), collected from Kamala valley, Namdapha TR, Changlang district, Arunachal Pradesh India, collected on 18 May 2022 by Abhijit Das and Bitupan Boruah; Figure S3.

Referred specimens.

one adult male (WII-ADR1409) and three adult females (WII-ADR1410–WII-ADR1412) collected from 18–19 Mile (27.48404°N, 96.40473°E, elevation 495 m a.s.l.) on 12 May 2022 by Abhijit Das and Bitupan Boruah; one adult male (WII-ADR1427) from Kamala valley (27.45808°N, 96.42804°E, elevation 730 m a.s.l.) on 18 May 2022 by Abhijit Das, Bitupan Boruah and Vijayan Jithin; one adult male (ZSI-R-29481) from Kamala valley (27.46457°N, 96.43790°E, elevation 540 m a.s.l.) on 3 June 2023 by Abhijit Das, Rajiv N.V., Jason D. Gerard and Sourav Dutta; one adult male (WII-ADR3061) and one adult female (WII-ADR3062) from 17–19 Mile (27.49338°N, 96.39535°E, elevation 450 m a.s.l.) on 8 September 2022 by Abhijit Das, Bitupan Boruah and Naitik G. Patel; one adult male (WII-ADR1403) from 14–15 Mile (27.49689°N, 96.35438°E, elevation 430 m a.s.l.) on 9 May 2022 by Abhijit Das and Bitupan Boruah; one adult male (WII-ADR3283) from Haldibari (27.52453°N, 96.39913°E, elevation 500 m a.s.l.) on 9 May 2023 by Rajiv N.V. and Sourav Dutta; one adult male (WII-ADR1440) from Motijheel trail (27.49624°N, 96.33304°E, elevation 400 m a.s.l.) on 20 May 2022 by Abhijit Das, Bitupan Boruah and Vijayan Jithin; one adult female (WII-ADR3070) from Motijheel (27.48644°N, 96.33136°E, elevation 640 m a.s.l.) on 11 September 2022 by Abhijit Das and Bitupan Boruah. All these localities fall in the Namdapha Tiger Reserve, Changlang district, Arunachal Pradesh, India.

Description of the holotype.

An adult male, SVL 81.22 mm and TAL 123.8 mm (incomplete), with a TAL/SVL ratio 1.52; head distinct from the neck, head longer than wide (HW/HL = 0.54), slightly concave on top; rostral scale crescent; snout rounded, longer than orbit (OD/EN = 0.79); scales on loreal region slightly keeled, surrounded by heterogenous scales; nasal separated from rostral by one scale; canthus rostralis sharp with 13 enlarged scales on each side; keels on canthal scales weak towards snout; nostril rounded, in contact with first supralabials; snout scales irregular in shape and size, with inverted Y-shaped pattern at the centre; head height at occipital region 12.89 mm; scales on head, snout and interorbital region heterogeneous; pupil round, horizontal orbital diameter 5.58 mm; tympanum concealed and covered with smooth scales; scales on neck overlapping and small interspersed with enlarged scales, size increases towards the trunk; three enlarged, keeled, and elevated scales behind the orbit; scales around the orbit small and irregular in shape; parietal eye is not distinct; gular distinct; scales on gular heterogeneous in size and mucronate, scales anterior to the gular pouch small, rounded, imbricate, and feebly keeled, larger in the middle; two distinct raised gular folds on either side of midline; folds curved towards midline posteriorly (Fig. 7); eight supralabials on left and nine on right; nine infralabials on both sides; nuchal crest poorly developed, consisting of 21 conical scales (Tables S4, S5).

Mental scale triangular, broader than long, and slightly narrower than the rostral; bordered posteriorly by one infralabial on each side, two enlarged postmentals in contact with the first infralabials; postmentals followed by a three small gular scale; four chin shields present on each side, positioned parallel to the infralabials; the anterior portion of the first chin shield contacts the first infralabial, while the remaining part of the first chin shield are separated from the infralabials by one intervening scale row and the other subsequent three chin shields are separated from the infralabials by two intervening scale rows.

Habitus slender, slightly compressed laterally, dorsal scales keeled, imbricate, and posteriorly pointed; mid-dorsal scale row strongly keeled, interspersed with enlarged scale, no enlarged keeled scales on flank; lateral scales heterogeneous, mostly smaller than the dorsals, slightly keeled, imbricate; 104 dorsal scales (VTSR); 106 rows of scales around the midbody; 126 ventral scales, larger than lateral scales and approximately equal to the enlarged dorsal scales, strongly keeled, imbricate, posteriorly pointed.

Limbs slender, moderate sized, lower arm length slightly longer than upper arm length (UAL/LAL = 0.91); femur length equal to crus length (femur/crus = 1.01); scales on dorsal surface of forelimbs strongly keeled, uniform and imbricate; scales on ventral side of the forelimbs relatively smaller, feebly keeled; relative length of digits: IV > III > II > V > I; scales on ventral side of hindlimb smaller than dorsal side, slightly keeled and imbricate; relative length of toes: IV > III > V > II > I; 36/35 sub digital lamellae under fourth toe, bicarinate.

Tail rounded, slightly compressed laterally, thick at the base, gradually tapering towards tip; covered with homogeneous scales; scales on the dorsal and ventral surface arranged regularly, strongly keeled, and imbricate.

Diagnosis.

A moderate-sized lizard, SVL 45.9–81.2 mm in male (n = 8) and SVL 55.4–72.9 mm in female (n = 7), TAL 115.6–184.5 mm in male (n = 8) and 131.8–181 mm in female (n = 7). Snout scales irregular in shape and size with an inverted Y-shaped pattern. Nuchal crest poorly developed with 12–20 conical scales. Body slightly compressed, scales at the trunk heterogeneous in size, smaller than the dorsal, slightly keeled, oriented backwards, no enlarged keeled scales on flank region, 73–110 dorsal scales (VTSR), 90–106 rows of scales around midbody, 116–138 ventrals. Mental broader than long, two enlarged postmental in contact with the first infralabials, anterior region of the first chin shield contacts the first infralabial, gular with two distinct raised gular folds on either side of midline, gular scales heterogeneous in size, feebly keeled, scales in middle region larger than those on anterior and posterior region.

Comparison.

Ptyctolaemus namdaphaensis sp. nov. looks similar to P. chindwinensis, as they are sister species. Ptyctolaemus namdaphaensis sp. nov. differs from P. chindwinensis by fewer nuchal crest NC 13–25 (vs. 26–29); P. namdaphaensis sp. nov. can be distinguished from P. collicristatus by relatively larger FLL/SVL 0.50–0.58 (vs. 0.40–0.45), by relatively larger HLL/SVL 0.87–0.99 (vs. 0.64–0.73), by higher number of midbody scales MBS 90–106 (vs. 75–87). Ptyctolaemus namdaphaensis sp. nov. differs from P. gularis by gular region pale-brownish white or bluish white with three broad dark-blue stripes (vs. pale-brown or pale-bluish green or pale-yellowish green; three to four broad dark-blue stripes; Fig. 15). Ptyctolaemus namdaphaensis sp. nov. differs from P. gularis and P. siangensis sp. nov. by absence of enlarged keeled scales on flank (vs. enlarged keeled scales scattered on flank).

In addition, the colouration on the gular region of P. namdaphaensis sp. nov. differs from P. siangensis sp. nov. in having light grass green gular in males (vs. gular with dark blue stripes separated by narrow white lines; Fig. 15). Ptyctolaemus namdaphaensis sp. nov. differs from P. chindwinensis in having a gular with light grass green (vs. bright yellow with two horizontal parallel black stripes). Ptyctolaemus namdaphaensis sp. nov. differs from P. collicristatus in having a gular region yellowish green with black spots (vs. bright yellow medially with greenish-yellow and dark brown laterally).

Morphological variation.

Details of morphometric and meristic variation among the type series are presented in Tables S4 and S5. The paratypes (WII ADR 3179) closely resemble the holotype in overall morphology, with the following distinctions. Each side of the lower jaw bears three chin shields posterior to the postmentals, arranged parallel to the infralabials; a series of six enlarged, keeled scales on the snout form an inverted “Y”-shaped pattern, with the first four anterior scales aligned along the midline and pointed posteriorly, posterior to the fourth scale, one scale on either side is oriented diagonally towards the superciliary ridge; paravertebral region rusty brown coloured varied from that of holotype in preservation; nuchal crest composed of enlarged scales in the paratype varied from that of triangular scales in the holotype; the paratype exhibits two enlarged temporal scales that are comparatively smaller than those of the holotype; additionally, the paratype has a moderately distinct gular fold bearing medium-sized, triangular scales, which differ slightly in size and prominence from those observed in the holotype; tail prominent white colouration with distinct brown bands scattered; dark spots on head and reticulation on flank in female paratypes barely visible. Paratype (ZSI-R-29480) shows the following distinctions, a series of six enlarged, keeled scales on the snout form an inverted “Y”-shaped pattern, with the first four anterior scales aligned along the midline and pointed posteriorly, posterior to the fourth scale, two scale on either side is oriented diagonally towards the superciliary ridge; paravertebral region rusty brown coloured varied from that of holotype in preservation; the paratype has a moderately distinct gular with medium-sized, triangular scales, which differ slightly in size and prominence from those observed in the holotype; scattered dark brown spots on the mental region is less distinct (Fig. S3).

Sexual dimorphism.

Adult males have a nuchal crest; gular in males green while the females have pale-yellow gular without any spots (Fig. 16).

Colouration in life.

Head brown or greyish brown or pale-yellowish brown with dark-brown spots; scales with golden yellow keels; pale bands on dorsal surface of head indistinct; dark edged light short streaks radiating from eye; an oblique streak extends from the posterior margin of eye to angle of jaw; lips pale-brown; paravertebral uniform light brown; lateral and dorsal side of neck pale-yellowish brown with irregular dark-brown spots; gular region light grass green with black spots (Fig. 15D); flank pale-yellowish with brown reticulation; reticulation diffused; dorsal surface of limbs brown with pale-yellow and dark-brown spots; tail light brown on the base to reddish brown towards the middle and paler towards tip, dark edged light cross bands and blackish patches irregularly placed; on ventral side, with black spot scattered on the anterior region; mental region creamish yellow with black spot forming irregular line towards the gular.

Colouration in preservative.

Dorsal head light brown with darks tiny spots; light greyish cross band between interorbital region; lateral head light brown with light greyish patch; nostril greyish with tiny black spots; lateral head light brown with greyish patch; enlarged keeled scales on the posterior mandibular region light coloured; few scales on the neck and lateral body with black tips; body light brown to rusty brown coloured; paravertebral region bluish grey coloured; greyish indistinct patch on lateral region; limbs light brown with greyish patch; dark brown patch on the limbs are visible; radial stripes around the eye visible; mantle creamish white with series of black spots forming irregular line; gular region pale bluish coloured; ventral side of forelimb, hindlimb and body creamish with greyish patch, black spots scattered throughout; tail dark brown with indistinct light bands; light bands on the digits visible (Fig. 14).

Figure 14. 

Holotype of P. namdaphaensis sp. nov. (WII-ADR3178). A Dorsal, B ventral and C lateral views of the body and D, E lateral, dorsal and ventral views of the head. Scale bar= 10 mm.

Figure 15. 

Gular colouration of P. namdaphaensis sp. nov. A Male (WII-ADR1409) from Namdapha; B male (WII-ADR1427) from Namdapha; C male (WII-ADR3061) from Namdapha; D holotype, male (WII-ADR3178) from Gandhigram; E female (WII-ADR1411) from Namdapha; F female (WII-ADR1412) from Namdapha.

Figure 16. 

Ptyctolaemus namdaphaensis sp. nov. in life condition. A, B Holotype (WII-ADR3178); C, D male (WII-ADR1409) and EG female (WII-ADR1410) from Nampdapha Tiger Reserve.

Sequence divergence.

Ptyctolaemus namdaphaensis sp. nov. has high genetic divergence to its sister species P. chindwinensis 8.2–9.5%. With other members of the genus, P. siangensis sp. nov. has 8.9–26.7% genetic difference (Table 5).

Etymology.

The specific epithet is a toponym derived from the name of the place “Namdapha Tiger Reserve” in the state of Arunachal Pradesh, India.

Common name.

Namdapha green fan-throated lizard.

Natural history and distribution.

We recorded individuals of this species in the following locations: Deban, Motijheel, Gibbon’s Land and Kamala valley in the Namdapha Tiger Reserve (Fig. 11D), and Gandhigram. During the day, we found individuals active along the roadside vegetation and forest trails in May and June of 2022 and 2023. We observed them perching on twigs and ferns at heights of around 1–2 metres above the ground. This species is sympatric with P. gularis in the Namdapha Tiger Reserve. Currently, this species is only known from Gandhigram and the Namdapha Tiger Reserve in Arunachal Pradesh, India.

Discussion

The true identity of P. gularis has been a conundrum for taxonomists (Schulte et al. 2004) due to imprecise type locality and gaps in the sampling from northeast India. Morphometrics and body ratios have been used for species diagnoses in other agamids (Bahir and Silva 2005; Edwards and Melville 2011; Deepak et al. 2016, 2018), often due to overlapping scale characters in congeners. This was also the case in Ptyctolaemus where there is extensive overlap in external morphological characters (Figs 3, 4). While we identified some distinct body ratios, some of the characters had considerable overlap (Fig. 5). This is most likely due to similar habits of the different Ptyctolaemus species. Such a high degree of morphological crypticism between species has previously been reported in other agamids (Wagner et al. 2018, 2021).

Among the three species found in northeast India the dewlap colouration in P. namdaphaensis sp. nov. is distinct from that of P. gularis and P. siangensis sp. nov. Ptyctolaemus namdaphaensis sp. nov. is most likely the second species in which females lack colouration on the dewlap, a dimorphism which was first reported in P. chindwinensis (Liu et al. 2021). Although P. gularis and P. siangensis sp. nov. are similar in dewlap colouration, they do have subtle differences. The background colour on the dewlap is whitish in P. siangensis sp. nov. whereas it is very often pale-brown or pale-yellowish green to pale-bluish green in P. gularis (Fig. 8) and rarely white (Figs 8E, 9E). The gular folds are prominent in P. gularis but incomplete at the base in P. siangensis sp. nov. and P. namdaphaensis sp. nov. (Fig. 7). The scattered enlarged keeled scales on the lateral side of the trunk are present in P. gularis and P. siangensis sp. nov. while they are absent in P. namdaphaensis sp. nov.

The mitochondrial ND2 gene is widely used to distinguish between agamid species (Schulte et al. 2004; Deepak et al. 2016; Wang et al. 2019, 2021; Liu et al. 2021; Boruah et al. 2022). The uncorrected p-distance between the five described and the one undescribed species is 8–26% in Ptyctolaemus (Table 5). The Ptyctolaemus sp. from north Myanmar is a distinct lineage as previously pointed out by Liu et al (2021) and it requires further investigation.

Studies focusing on the evolution of sexual dimorphism in agamids have found that natural selection constrains the evolution of elaborate ornaments in both sexes, as well as sexual dichromatism of body regions exposed to visual predators. In contrast, dichromatism of ‘hidden’ body regions and the degree of ornament dimorphism appear to be driven to a greater extent by sexual selection (Stuart-Fox and Ord 2004). Among the agamids distributed in India some have distinct ornamentation such as nuchal and dorsal crest with conical spines (e.g., Calotes) while others lack distinct spines, they have extendable appendages in the nuchal region (e.g., Sitana and Sarada). The latter character applies to Ptyctolaemus and is clearly a sexually dimorphic character that is prominent in males and are negligible or absent in females.

Some of the agamid lizard genera found in northeast India, which were once considered species-poor and widespread, have been found to comprise multiple species (e.g., Calotes; Giri et al. 2019; Patel et al. 2024). Calotes zolaiking Giri et al., 2019, which was believed to be endemic to Mizoram, has recently been reported in the Khasi Hills (Bohra et al. 2025). As with many other reptile groups, there are several gaps in the taxonomic knowledge and species distribution data for agamids in northeast India. With the description of two new Ptyctolaemus from northeast India, the number of described species in the genus increases to five. Of the five species, now three species P. gularis, P. siangensis sp. nov. and P. namdaphaensis sp. nov. are found in India. Our study found that P. gularis is widely distributed across the southern part of Brahmaputra River valley while P. siangensis sp. nov. is distributed west of the Siang River valley and to the north of the Brahmaputra River valley. Ptyctolaemus namdaphaensis sp. nov. is currently endemic to Namdapha Tiger Reserve and Gandhigram in Changlang district of Arunachal Pradesh. Further surveys may extend its distribution into northern Myanmar.

Acknowledgements

We thank the National Geographic Society for the award of National Geographic Explorer Grant (NGS-74044R-20) and SERB-DST (CRG/2018/000790) for funding. We are grateful to the Forest Department of Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Meghalaya, Mizoram and Nagaland for giving us research permission to carry out the study (vide letter nos. FWC/G/173/Pt-111/3897-908 dated 9 February 2016; CWL/GEN/13(95)/11-12/Pt.V/438-40 dated 2 May 2018; CWL/G/173/2018-19/Pt.VII/1100-07 dated 22 August 2019; WL/FG.31/Technical Committee/2019, dated 18 July 2019; B.19060/1/2020-CWLW/112 dated 2 February 2021. We thank Sh. Aduk Paron (former director, Namdapha Tiger reserve), Sh. Tajum Yomcha (APFD) and Sh. Mayur Variya (Biologist, Namdapha Tiger Reserve), Kabuk Lego (Range Officer, Mehao WLS) for their support. We are thankful to the Director and Dean, Wildlife Institute of India for constant support. We thank Jason D. Gerard for help in initial data verification and lab work. We thank Sourav Dutta, Naitik G. Patel, Rajiv N.V., Vijayan Jithin, Krishnendu Banerjee, Santanu Dey, John Tayeng, Aphu Yoha Yobin, Akhida, Lishi Gunia, Late Teibor Marwein, Isaac Rayen, Asim Basir, Isaac Zosangliana, Lalhmangaiha Khiangte, Malsawmdawngliana for their help during field work. We thank the three reviewers and the editor for their valuable comments on the previous draft of this manuscript.

References

  • Ahsan MF, Asmat GS, Chakma S (2008) A second record of Ptyctolaemus gularis (Peters, 1864) from Bangladesh. Asiatic Herpetological Research 11: 10–12.
  • Bahir MM, Silva A (2005) Otocryptis nigristigma, a new species of agamid lizard from Sri Lanka. Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 12: 393–406.
  • Bohra SC, Ranglong C, Thongni G, Wankhar B, Umlong CM, Das M, Warjri H, Purkayastha J (2025) Leaping from Mizoram to Meghalaya: First documentation of Calotes zolaiking Giri, Chaitanya, Mahony, Lalronunga, Lalrinchhana, Das, Sarkar, Karanth, Deepak, 2019 (Sauria: Agamidae) outside its type locality in Mizoram, India. Zootaxa 5642: 395–400. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5642.4.7
  • Boulenger GA (1890) The Fauna of British India, including Ceylon and Burma. Taylor and Francis, London, 541 pp.
  • Boruah B, Narayanan S, Aravind NA, Lalronunga S, Deepak V, Das A (2024) Description of six new species of Cyrtodactylus Gray (Squamata: Gekkonidae) from northeastern India. Vertebrate Zoology 74: 453–486. https://doi.org/10.3897/vz.74.e124752
  • Che J, Jiang k, Yan F, Zhang Y (2020) Amphibians and Reptiles in Tibet – Diversity and Evolution. Science Press, Beijing, xxiii, 803 pp. [in Chinese].
  • Das A, Sharma P, Harikrishnan S, Nath A, Ghosh S, Dutta D, Mondol J, Wangdi Y (2016) Addition to the herpetofauna of Royal Manas National Park, Bhutan, with six new country records. Herpetology Notes 9: 261–278.
  • Deepak V, Giri VB, Asif M, Dutta SK, Vyas R, Zambre AM, Bhosale H, Karanth KP (2016) Systematics and phylogeny of Sitana (Reptilia: Agamidae) of Peninsular India, with description of one new genus and five new species. Contributions to Zoology 85: 67–111. https://doi.org/10.1163/18759866-08501004
  • Deepak V, Khandekar A, Chaitanya R, Karanth P (2018) Descriptions of two new endemic and cryptic species of Sitana Cuvier, 1829 from Peninsular India. Zootaxa 4434: 327–365. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4434.2.5
  • Denzer W, Günther R, Manthey U (1997) Annotated type catalogue of the agamid lizards (Reptilia: Squamata: Agamidae) in the Museum für Naturkunde der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (former Zoological Museum Berlin). Mitteilungen des Zoologischen Museums in Berlin 73: 309–332.
  • Giri VB, Chaitanya R, Mahony S, Lalrounga S, Lalrinchhana C, Das A, Sarkar V, Karanth P, Deepak V (2019) On the systematic status of the genus Oriocalotes Günther, 1864 (Squamata: Agamidae: Draconinae) with the description of a new species from Mizoram state, Northeast India. Zootaxa 4638: 451–484. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4638.4.1
  • Edwards DL, Melville J (2011) Extensive phylogeographic and morphological diversity in Diporiphora nobbi (Agamidae) leads to a taxonomic review and a new species description. Journal of Herpetology 45: 530–546. https://doi.org/10.1670/10-115.1
  • Hoang DT, Chernomor O, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ, Vinh LS (2018) UFBoot2: Improving the ultrafast bootstrap approximation. Molecular Biology and Evolution 35: 518–522.
  • Huang Y-Z (1980) A new generic record of Chinese lizard from Xizang (Tibet) — Ptyctolaemus gularis Peters. Acta Zootaxonomica Sinica 5: 336.
  • Jerdon TC (1870) Notes on Indian herpetology. Proceedings of the Asiatic Society of Bengal 3: 66–85.
  • Kalyaanamoorthy S, Minh BQ, Wong TK, Von Haeseler A, Jermiin LS (2017) ModelFinder: Fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nature Methods 14: 587–589. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4285
  • Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K (2016) MEGA7: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Molecular Biology and Evolution 33: 1870–1874. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msw054
  • Lanfear R, Calcott B, Ho SY, Guindon S (2012) PartitionFinder: Combined selection of partitioning schemes and substitution models for phylogenetic analyses. Molecular Biology and Evolution 29: 1695–1701. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mss020
  • Liu S, Hou M, Lwin YH, Rao D (2021) A new species of the genus Ptyctolaemus Peters, 1864 (Squamata, Agamidae) from Sagaing, Myanmar. Evolutionary Systematics 5: 347–357. https://doi.org/10.3897/evolsyst.5.75305
  • Mathew R (1995) Fauna of Meghalaya, Part I (Vertebrates, Reptilia). Zoological Survey of India, State Fauna Series 4: 379–454.
  • Nguyen LT, Schmidt HA, Von Haeseler A, Minh BQ (2015) IQ-TREE: A fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Molecular Biology and Evolution 32: 268–274. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msu300
  • Pawar S, Birand A (2001) A Survey of Amphibians, Reptiles, and Birds in Northeast India. CERC Technical Report#6. Centre for Ecological Research and Conservation, Mysore, 118 pp.
  • Patel H, Thackeray T, Sheth C, Khandekar A, Agarwal I (2024) A new small-sized Calotes Cuvier (Squamata: Agamidae: Draconinae) from the Subansiri river basin, Arunachal Pradesh, India. Zootaxa 5523: 151–170. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5523.2.1
  • Peters WCH (1864) Über einige neue Säugethiere (Mormops, Macrotus, Vesperus, Molossus, Capromys), Amphibien (Platydactylus, Otocryptis, Euprepes, Ungalia, Dromicus, Tropidonotus, Xenodon, Hylotes) und Fische (Sillago, Sebastes, Channa, Myctophum, Carassius, Barbus, Capoëta, Poecilia, Saurenchelys, Leptocephalus). Monatsberichte der königlichen preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin 1864: 381–399.
  • R Core Team (2021) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.r-project.org
  • ​​Rambaut A, Drummond AJ, Xie D, Baele G, Suchard MA (2018) Posterior summarization in Bayesian phylogenetics using Tracer 1.7. Systematic Biology 67: 901–904. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syy032
  • Ronquist F, Teslenko M, Mark VDP, Ayres D, Darling A, Hohna S, Larget B, Liu L, Suchard MA, Huelsenbeck JP (2012) MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology 61: 539–542. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/sys029
  • Schulte JA II, Vindum JV, Win H, Thin T, Lwin KS, Shein AK (2004) Phylogenetic relationships of the genus Ptyctolaemus (Squamata: Agamidae), with a description of a new species from Chin Hills of Western Myanmar. Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences 55: 222–247.
  • Shreve B (1940) Reptiles and amphibians from Burma with descriptions of three new skinks [sic]. Proceedings of the New England Zoölogy Club 18: 17–26.
  • Smith MA (1940) The amphibians and reptiles obtained by Mr. Ronald Kaulback in upper Burma. Records of the Indian Museum 42: 465–486.
  • Stuart-Fox DM, Ord TJ (2004) Sexual selection, natural selection and the evolution of dimorphic coloration and ornamentation in agamid lizards. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 271: 2249–2255. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2004.2802
  • Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ (1994) CLUSTAL W: Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Research 22: 4673–4680. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/22.22.4673
  • Thorpe RS (1975) Quantitative handling of characters useful in snake systematics with particular reference to interspecific variation in the ringed snake Natrix natrix (L.). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 7: 27–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.1975.tb00732.x
  • Thorpe RS (1983) Phylogenetic analysis of range expansion in the grass snake: Reticulate evolution: Primary and secondary contact zones. In: Felsenstein J (Ed.) Numerical Taxonomy: Proceedings of a NATO Advanced Study Institute. NATO Advanced Study Institute Series G (Ecological Sciences), No.1, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg and New York, NY, 464–468.
  • Venables WN, Ripley BD (2002) Modern Applied Statistics with S. 4th Edition. Springer, New York, NY, XII, 498 pp.
  • Wagner P, Greenbaum E, Bauer AM, Kusamba C, Leaché AD (2018) Lifting the blue-headed veil–integrative taxonomy of the Acanthocercus atricollis species complex (Squamata: Agamidae). Journal of Natural History 52: 771–817. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2018.1435833
  • Wagner P, Ihlow F, Hartmann T, Flecks M, Schmitz A, Böhme W (2021) Integrative approach to resolve the Calotes mystaceus Duméril & Bibron, 1837 species complex (Squamata: Agamidae). Bonn Zoological Bulletin 70: 141–171. https://doi.org/10.20363/BZB-2021.70.1.141
  • Wall F (1908) Remarks on the agamoid lizard (Ptyctolaemus gularis). Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society 18: 505.
  • Wang K, Che J, Lin S, Deepak V, Aniruddha DR, Jiang K, Jin J, Chen H, Siler CD (2019) Multilocus phylogeny and revised classification for mountain dragons of the genus Japalura sl.(Reptilia: Agamidae: Draconinae) from Asia. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 185: 246–267. https://doi.org/10.1093/zoolinnean/zly034
  • Wang K, Ren J, Wu J, Jiang K, Jin J, Hou S, Zheng P, Xie F, Siler CD, Che J (2021) Systematic revision of mountain dragons (Reptilia: Agamidae: Diploderma) in China, with descriptions of six new species and discussion on their conservation. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 59: 222–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/jzs.12414
  • Wickham H (2009) ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer, New York, NY, VIII, 213 pp.
  • Xu W, Dong WJ, Fu TT, Gao W, Lu CQ, Yan F, Wu YH, Jiang K, Jin JQ, Chen HM, Zhang YP (2021) Herpetological phylogeographic analyses support a Miocene focal point of Himalayan uplift and biological diversification. National Science Review 8: nwaa263. https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwaa263
  • Zhang D, Gao F, Jakovlić I, Zou H, Zhang J, Li WX, Wang GT (2020) PhyloSuite: An integrated and scalable desktop platform for streamlined molecular sequence data management and evolutionary phylogenetics studies. Molecular Ecology Resources 20: 348–355. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13096
  • Zhao EM, Adler K (1993) Herpetology of China. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles (Contributions to Herpetology, 10), Oxford, OH, 522 pp.
  • Zhao E[M], Zhao K, Zhou K (1999) Fauna Sinica. Reptilia Vol. 2. Squamata, Lacertilia. Science Press, Beijing, xi, 394 pp. [in Chinese].
  • Zug GR, Brown HH, Schulte JA, Vindum JV (2006) Systematics of the garden lizards, Calotes versicolor group (Reptilia, Squamata, Agamidae), in Myanmar: Central dry zone populations. Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences 57: 35–68.

Amirtha Balan and Abhijit Das shared first authorship

Supplementary materials

Supplementary material 1 

Figures S1–S3

Balan A, Das A, Boruah B, Tillack T, Lalronunga S, Deepak V (2025)

Data type: .docx

Explanation notes: Figure S1. Principal component analyses results for the first eight axes plotted by sexes. — Figure S2. Paratype of P. siangensis sp. nov.Figure S3. Paratype of P. namdaphaensis sp. nov.

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Download file (2.92 MB)
Supplementary material 2 

Tables S1–S6

Balan A, Das A, Boruah B, Tillack T, Lalronunga S, Deepak V (2025)

Data type: .xlsx

Explanation notes: Table S1. PCA factor loadings. — Table S2. Shapiro-Wilk normality test for the 25 variables used in this study — Table S3. Distributional information for specimens examined in this study. — Table S4. Morpholo­gical characters of the two newly described Ptyctolaemus species and Ptyctolaemus gularis. — Table S5. Meristic characters of the two newly described Ptyctolaemus species and Ptyctolaemus gularis. — Table S6. Uncorrected mean P-distance among the Ptyctolaemus species included in this study.

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Download file (67.13 kb)
login to comment