Research Article |
|
Corresponding author: Veerappan Deepak ( veerappandeepak@gmail.com ) Academic editor: Uwe Fritz
© 2025 Amirtha Balan, Abhijit Das, Bitupan Boruah, Frank Tillack, Samuel Lalronunga, Veerappan Deepak.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Balan A, Das A, Boruah B, Tillack F, Lalronunga S, Deepak V (2025) Description of two new species of Ptyctolaemus (Squamata: Agamidae) from northeast India. Vertebrate Zoology 75: 487-516. https://doi.org/10.3897/vz.75.e162650
|
Abstract
The genus Ptyctolaemus Peters, 1864 is currently represented by three species; P. gularis, P. collicristatus and P. chindwinensis. Previous molecular phylogenetic studies have highlighted additional lineages within P. gularis. Phylogenetic analysis using the ND2 mitochondrial gene recovered three distinct lineages in India. Multivariate analyses using morphological data placed the type specimen of P. gularis (ZMB 5004) with the samples collected from Meghalaya. We assign this lineage as P. gularis and describe the other two lineages as new species. Ptyctolaemus siangensis sp. nov. found west of Siang River in Arunachal Pradesh and Ptyctolaemus namdaphaensis sp. nov. found in Namdapha, Changlang district of Arunachal Pradesh. Although phenotypically similar the two new species differ from its congeners in gular colouration and subtle morphological differences.
Agamids, Arunachal Pradesh, DNA, molecular, morphology, multivariate analysis
The genus Ptyctolaemus Peters, 1864 is distributed in the Indo-Burma region and Xizang (Tibet), China (
For this study, we collected specimens of Ptyctolaemus from 29 different locations across four states in northeast India and examined the type material. We were able to identify and allocate one population as the true P. gularis based on the holotype data. The other two populations are described as new species herein.
A total of 44 individuals of Ptyctolaemus lizards were collected from 29 localities in northeast India (Fig.
Sampling localities of the current study and type localities of the Ptyctolaemus species. See Table
Sampling site details of this study. Serial numbers (Sl) correspond to those shown on the map in Figure
| Sl. No. | Locality | Latitude / Longitude |
| 1 | Khellong, West Kameng district, Arunachal Pradesh, India | 27.00350, 92.24502 |
| 2 | Nameri National Park, Assam, India | 26.95051, 92.92221 |
| 3 | Potin, Lower Subansiri district, Arunachal Pradesh, India | 27.34786, 93.84970 |
| 4 | Medog, China * | 29.24414, 95.15913 |
| 5 | Pittung, Upper Siang district, Arunachal Pradesh, India | 28.67146, 94.96159 |
| 6 | Jengging, Upper Siang district, Arunachal Pradesh, India | 28.53543, 95.03106 |
| 7 | Rottung, East Siang district, Arunachal Pradesh, India | 28.14114, 95.15620 |
| 8 | Sally lake, Mehao Wildlife Sanctuary, Lower Dibang valley district, Arunachal Pradesh, India | 28.16814, 95.83751 |
| 9 | Motijheel, Namdapha Tiger Reserve, Changlang district, Arunachal Pradesh, India | 27.48644, 96.33136 |
| 10 | Motijheel trail, Namdapha Tiger Reserve, Changlang district, Arunachal Pradesh, India | 27.49624, 96.33304 |
| 11 | Namdapha Tiger Reserve, Changlang district, Arunachal Pradesh, India | 27.49689, 96.35438 |
| 12 | Haldibari, Namdapha Tiger Reserve, Changlang district, Arunachal Pradesh, India | 27.52453, 96.39913 |
| 13 | Deban, Namdapha Tiger Reserve, Changlang district, Arunachal Pradesh, India | 27.49445, 96.39022 |
| 14 | Namdapha Tiger Reserve, Changlang district, Arunachal Pradesh, India | 27.49548, 96.39190 |
| 15 | Namdapha Tiger Reserve, Changlang district, Arunachal Pradesh, India | 27.48404, 96.40473 |
| 16 | Namdapha Tiger Reserve, Changlang district, Arunachal Pradesh, India | 27.49338, 96.39535 |
| 17 | Kamala valley, Namdapha Tiger Reserve, Changlang district, Arunachal Pradesh, India | 27.45808, 96.42804 |
| 18 | Kamala valley, Namdapha Tiger Reserve, Changlang district, Arunachal Pradesh, India | 27.46457, 96.43790 |
| 19 | 40th mile, Namdapha Tiger Reserve, Changlang district, Arunachal Pradesh, India | 27.48789, 96.54165 |
| 20 | Kalai, Kamlang Tiger Reserve, Lohit district, Arunachal Pradesh, India | 27.72294, 96.43460 |
| 21 | Gandhigram, Changlang district, Arunachal Pradesh, India | 27.26515, 96.93878 |
| 22 | Jeypore, Dibrugarh district, Assam, India | 27.25325, 95.57889 |
| 23 | Daribokgre, East Garo Hills district, Meghalaya, India | 25.49675, 90.32742 |
| 24 | Tyrna, East Khasi Hills district, Meghalaya, India | 25.24052, 91.68183 |
| 25 | Risa forest, East Khasi Hills district, Meghalaya, India | 25.55615, 91.89389 |
| 26 | Malki forest, East Khasi Hills district, Meghalaya, India | 25.55602, 91.88678 |
| 27 | Narpuh Wildlife Sanctuary, East Jaintia Hills district, Meghalaya, India | 25.11062, 92.37215 |
| 28 | Lakhicherra, Cachar district, Assam, India | 24.97502, 92.77305 |
| 29 | Darlawn, Aizawl district, Mizoram, India | 24.01611, 92.92905 |
| 30 | Reiek, Mamit district, Mizoram, India | 23.69319, 92.60626 |
| 31 | Ngengpui Wildlife Sanctuary, Lawngtlai district, Mizoram, India | 22.49004, 92.75874 |
| * Site details obtained from |
||
We extracted genomic DNA from liver tissue samples stored in absolute ethanol at –20°C, using the DNeasy (Qiagen) blood and tissue kit. We amplified the partial fragment (~1100 base pairs) of the mitochondrial NADH dehydrogenase subunit 2 (ND2) gene, for a total of 21 specimens using the following primers: MetF1 and H5934 (
Mitochondrial ND2 sequences generated and other GenBank sequences used to build phylogenies.
| Species | Voucher number | Locality | Accession number | Reference |
| Ptyctolaemus “gularis” | KIZ016452 | Medog, Tibet, China | MK001393 |
|
| Ptyctolaemus “gularis” | KIZ06654 | Medog, Tibet, China | MW111456 |
|
| Ptyctolaemus “gularis” | KIZ09947 | Medog, Tibet, China | MW133374 | Che et al. (2021) |
| Ptyctolaemus sp. | CAS 221515 | Putao, Kachin, Myanmar | AY555838 |
|
| Ptyctolaemus chindwinensis | SEABRI 2019120076 | Htamanthi, Sagaing, Myanmar | OK563731 |
|
| Ptyctolaemus collicristatus | USNM 559811 | Min Dat, Chin, Myanmar | AY555837 |
|
| Draco blanfordii | MVZ 222156 | An Khe, Gia Lai, Vietnam | AF128477 |
|
| Ptyctolaemus namdaphaensis sp. nov. |
|
14–15 Mile, Namdapha Tiger Reserve, Changlang district, Arunachal Pradesh, India | LC897099 | This study |
| Ptyctolaemus namdaphaensis sp. nov. |
|
18–19 Mile, Namdapha Tiger Reserve, Changlang district, Arunachal Pradesh, India | LC897100 | This study |
| Ptyctolaemus namdaphaensis sp. nov. |
|
18–19 Mile, Namdapha Tiger Reserve, Changlang district, Arunachal Pradesh, India | LC897101 | This study |
| Ptyctolaemus namdaphaensis sp. nov. |
|
18–19 Mile, Namdapha Tiger Reserve, Changlang district, Arunachal Pradesh, India | LC897102 | This study |
| Ptyctolaemus namdaphaensis sp. nov. |
|
Kamala valley, Namdapha Tiger Reserve, Changlang district, Arunachal Pradesh, India | LC897103 | This study |
| Ptyctolaemus namdaphaensis sp. nov. |
|
Gandhigram, Changlang district, Arunachal Pradesh, India | LC897105 | This study |
| Ptyctolaemus namdaphaensis sp. nov. |
|
Haldibari, Namdapha Tiger Reserve, Changlang district, Arunachal Pradesh, India | LC897104 | This study |
| Ptyctolaemus namdaphaensis sp. nov. |
|
Kamala valley, Namdapha Tiger Reserve, Changlang district, Arunachal Pradesh, India | LC897098 | This study |
| Ptyctolaemus siangensis sp. nov. |
|
Rottung, East Siang district, Arunachal Pradesh, India | LC897107 | This study |
| Ptyctolaemus siangensis sp. nov. |
|
Pittung, Upper Siang district, Arunachal Pradesh, India | LC897108 | This study |
| Ptyctolaemus siangensis sp. nov. |
|
Potin, Lower Subansiri district, Arunachal Pradesh, India | LC897106 | This study |
| Ptyctolaemus gularis |
|
40 Mile, Namdapha Tiger Reserve, Changlang district, Arunachal Pradesh, India | LC897088 | This study |
| Ptyctolaemus gularis |
|
Kalai, Kamlang Tiger Reserve, Lohit district, Arunachal Pradesh, India | LC897091 | This study |
| Ptyctolaemus gularis |
|
Motijheel Trail, Namdapha Tiger Reserve, Changlang district, Arunachal Pradesh, India | LC897090 | This study |
| Ptyctolaemus gularis |
|
Daribokgre, East Garo Hills district, Meghalaya, India | LC897093 | This study |
| Ptyctolaemus gularis |
|
Risa forest, Shillong, East Khasi Hills district, Meghalaya, India | LC897092 | This study |
| Ptyctolaemus gularis |
|
Narpuh Wildlife Sanctuary, East Jaintia Hills district, Meghalaya, India | LC897094 | This study |
| Ptyctolaemus gularis | ADR1152 | Teirei, Dampa Tiger Reserve, Mamit district, Mizoram, India | LC897096 | This study |
| Ptyctolaemus gularis | ADR1054 | Ngengpui Wildlife Sanctuary, Lawngtlai district, Mizoram, India | LC897095 | This study |
| Ptyctolaemus gularis |
|
Lakhicherra, Cachar district, Assam, India | LC897097 | This study |
| Ptyctolaemus gularis |
|
Jeypore, Dihing-Patkai National Park, Dibrugarh district, Assam, India | LC897089 | This study |
We performed maximum likelihood analyses using the GUI version of the IQTREE (
Morphometric characters were measured to the nearest 0.01 mm using a digital calliper (Mitutoyo 500-197-30), except for tail length, which was measured using thread and digital calliper. Morphometric and meristic characters were examined using an Olympus SZX10 microscope. Morphometric terminologies follow (
Summary of morphometric measurements of Ptyctolaemus species, means and range are provided in brackets. Data for Ptyctolaemus collicristatus and P. chindwinensis were collated from
| Characters | P. gularis | P. siangensis sp. nov. | P. namdaphaensis sp. nov. | P. chindwinensis (♂ = 3, ♀ = 1) | P. collicristatus (♂ = 5, ♀ = 2) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male (n = 7) | Female (n = 18) | Male (n = 2) | Female (n = 3) | Male (n = 8) | Female (n = 7) | |||
| SVL | 72.29 (62.59–79.24) | 65.67 (46.67–76.29) | 72.29 (66.9–77.68) | 62.77 (58.03–66.62) | 61.02625 (45.99–81.22) | 68.36 (55.44–72.85) | 67.70 (45.6–83.5) | 80.27 (71.1–91.3) |
| TAL | 158.88 (131.31–181.23) | 146.35 (101.32–166.15) | 173.76 (157.56–189.96) | 148.49 (140.75–153.95) | 141.1775 (115.61–184.47) | 167.90 (131.84–180.95) | 161.25 (102–206) | 162.29 (137–182) |
| SVL/TAL | 0.46 (0.42–0.49) | 0.45 (0.42–0.5) | 0.42 (0.41–0.42) | 0.42 (0.41–0.44) | 0.44 (0.40–0.66) | 0.41 (0.38–0.42) | 0.42 (0.41–0.45) | 0.50 (0.47–0.56) |
| TAL/SVL | 2.20 (2.04–2.4) | 2.23 (1.99–2.38) | 2.40 (2.36–2.45) | 2.37 (2.26–2.43) | 2.35 (1.52–2.51) | 2.45 (2.37–2.62) | NA | NA |
| TH | 6.21 (4.41–7.27) | 4.61 (2.9–6.38) | 5.775 (5.66–5.89) | 4.63 (4.22–4.86) | 4.84 (3.32–6.48) | 5.36 (4.24–6.08) | NA | NA |
| TW | 6.33 (4.86–7.02) | 5.50 (3.91–7.13) | 6.07 (5.32–6.82) | 5.13 (4.83–5.35) | 5.04 (3.14–8.68) | 6.05 (4.52–6.89) | NA | NA |
| TrunkL | 33.42 (28.22–36.91) | 31.74 (21.9–39.97) | 37.22 (35.41–39.03) | 29.57 (25.65–31.6) | 28.34 (21.89–36.44) | 33.81 (27.41–37.14) | 32.20 (21.4–38.4) | NA |
| PectW | 9.43 (5.88–11.06) | 8.58 (6.5–11.13) | 8.915 (8.52–9.31) | 7.89 (6.87–8.62) | 7.86 (5.83–11.93) | 9.48 (8.02–10.56) | NA | NA |
| PelvW | 7.55 (6.42–8.72) | 7.21 (4.79–9.56) | 6.705 (6.59–6.82) | 6.17 (5.09–6.85) | 6.16 (4.1–9.63) | 7.37 (5.61–8.52) | NA | NA |
| HL | 20.34 (17.17–22.15) | 18.72 (13.56–22.61) | 20.265 (19.52–21.01) | 18.12 (16.36–19.13) | 17.79 (13.55–25.06) | 19.68 (16.19–20.98) | 19.18 (13.7–23.3) | 22.13 (19.9–24.7) |
| HW | 10.55 (8.07–12.43) | 9.03 (6.3–11.41) | 9.66 (8.98–10.34) | 9.09 (8.31–9.98) | 8.50 (6.2–13.62) | 9.51 (8.36–10.35) | 11.23 (8.6–12.8) | 11.81 (10.9–13.2) |
| HW/HL | 0.52 (0.47–0.59) | 0.48 (0.43–0.54) | 0.48 (0.46–0.49) | 0.51 (0.43–0.61) | 0.47 (0.44–0.54) | 0.48 (0.45–0.52) | 0.59 (0.55–0.63) | 0.53 (0.52–0.55) |
| HD | 10.67 (8.94–11.57) | 9.62 (7.4–11.65) | 10.41 (10.34–10.48) | 9.34 (8.72–9.89) | 8.96 (7.34–12.89) | 9.93 (8.7–11.22) | NA | NA |
| JawW | 11.26 (9.27–12.18) | 10.20 (7.72–11.83) | 10.165 (10.03–10.3) | 9.50 (9.26–9.77) | 9.68 (7.54–13.98) | 10.70 (9.42–11.45) | NA | NA |
| IN | 4.11 (3.66–4.75) | 3.56 (2.72–4.16) | 3.8 (3.62–3.98) | 3.40 (3.06–3.69) | 3.56 (2.83–5.25) | 3.55 (3.17–3.75) | NA | NA |
| IO | 7.42 (5.98–8.93) | 6.51 (5–7.67) | 7.06 (6.77–7.35) | 6.60 (6.23–6.99) | 6.20 (4.78–8.82) | 6.72 (5.54–7.4) | NA | NA |
| OD | 4.30 (3.64–4.9) | 3.95 (3.01–4.6) | 4.92 (4.46–5.38) | 3.84 (3.74–3.98) | 4.22 (3.37–5.58) | 4.4 (3.86–4.84) | 6.43 (5.1–7.2) | 6.00 |
| EN | 6.13 (4.66–7.63) | 5.54 (3.81–7.28) | 5.485 (5.27–5.7) | 5.41 (4.89–5.88) | 5.49 (4.4–7.99) | 5.73 (4.42–6.2) | 5.9 | 6.7 |
| OD/EN | 0.72 (0.51–0.87) | 0.72 (0.57–0.86) | 0.90 (0.85–0.94) | 0.72 (0.65–0.81) | 0.77 (0.70–0.89) | 0.77 (0.67–0.87) | NA | NA |
| NS | 2.77 (2.35–3.17) | 2.26 (1.58–2.83) | 2.61 (2.48–2.74) | 2.14 (1.97–2.3) | 2.24 (1.89–3.06) | 2.46 (2.27–2.6) | NA | NA |
| SE | 9.09 (7.08–10.79) | 8.04 (5.89–9.89) | 8.635 (8.32–8.95) | 7.57 (6.51–8.11) | 7.74 (6.17–10.96) | 8.43 (6.76–9.26) | 9.6 | 10.6 |
| UAL | 10.65 (8.4–12.35) | 9.30 (6.33–10.97) | 9.965 (9.39–10.54) | 9.25 (9.08–9.39) | 9.46 (7.49–12.7) | 10.57 (8.9–11.66) | NA | NA |
| LAL | 11.61 (9.1–13.21) | 10.38 (7.07–11.72) | 10.825 (10.38–11.27) | 9.92 (9.67–10.42) | 10.31 (7.85–14.27) | 12.11 (10–13.02) | NA | NA |
| UAL/LAL | 0.92 (0.84–1.11) | 0.90 (0.84–1.01) | 0.92 (0.90–0.94) | 0.93 (0.89–0.97) | 0.92 (0.84–0.97) | 0.87 (0.81–0.94) | NA | NA |
| FFL | 11.95 (10.1–14.25) | 11.33 (8.22–12.79) | 11.615 (11.08–12.15) | 11.64 (11.29–12.11) | 11.86 (8.21–16.37) | 13.42 (11.24–14.68) | NA | NA |
| FLL | 34.97 (29.3–40.25) | 31.91 (22.52–35.74) | 33.32 (32.82–33.83) | 31.75 (30.98–32.71) | 32.55 (24.61–43.38) | 36.97 (31.03–38.68) | 33.70 (23.8–39.8) | 33.63 (30.2–36.1) |
| FLL/SVL | 0.48 (0.45–0.52) | 0.49 (0.43–0.55) | 0.46 (0.44–0.49) | 0.51 (0.49–0.54) | 0.53 (0.50–0.58) | 0.54 (0.51–0.57) | 0.50 (0.48–0.52) | 0.42 (0.40–0.45) |
| 4th Fing | 7.69 (6.87–8.44) | 6.81 (4.76–8.21) | 7.555 (6.99–8.12) | 6.69 (6.26–7.13) | 7.41 (4.97–11.03) | 7.72 (6.55–8.43) | NA | NA |
| Femur | 17.75 (14.83–19.84) | 16.02 (11–18.79) | 17.945 (17.32–18.57) | 16.03 (15.33–16.4) | 16.72 (12.92–22.35) | 18.22 (15.54–19.39) | NA | NA |
| Crus | 16.91 (13.69–18.96) | 15.50 (10.35–17.86) | 17.09 (16.78–17.4) | 15.35 (14.39–15.89) | 16.82 (12.49–22.15) | 18.86 (16.11–19.85) | NA | NA |
| Femur/Crus | 1.05 (0.95–1.22) | 1.03 (0.97–1.08) | 1.05 (1.03–1.07) | 1.04 (1.03–1.07) | 1.00 (0.93–1.03) | 0.97 (0.94–1.01) | NA | NA |
| HFL | 23.30 (17.73–26.43) | 20.94 (14.42–22.49) | 23.39 (23.13–23.64) | 21.86 (21.31–22.28) | 22.57 (17.15–29.71) | 24.77 (22.14–26.12) | NA | NA |
| HLL | 59.37 (50.12–66.03) | 53.49 (36.83–59.86) | 65.98 (64.22–67.73) | 59.93 (57.72–61.69) | 57.10 (43.59–75.22) | 62.82 (54.75–65.515) | 62.23 (42.3–74.8) | 55.31 (49.8–58.8) |
| HLL/SVL | 0.80 (0.7–0.89) | 0.82 (0.74–0.9) | 0.92 (0.87–0.96) | 0.96 (0.93–0.99) | 0.93 (0.88–0.99) | 0.92 (0.87–0.99) | 0.92 (0.90–0.94) | 0.69 (0.64–0.73) |
| 4th Toe | 12.86 (8.32–16.2) | 11.86 (7.97–12.84) | 13.14 (13.03–13.24) | 12.26 (11.99–12.55) | 13.37 (9.72–17.81) | 13.97 (12.19–15.93) | NA | NA |
| Snt-Forl | 31.93 (25.17–36.41) | 27.90 (19.16–31.7) | 31.25 (27.84–34.66) | 27.64 (27.1–28.05) | 27.24 (19.47–39.24) | 29.22 (22.73–30.9) | NA | NA |
Fourteen meristic characters were taken: 1) CanthR (canthus rostralis, number of elongate scales along the dorsolateral snout ridge from the posterodorsal corner of nasal scale to the posteriormost supraciliary scale), 2) Suplab (supralabials, posterior end defined by posteriormost enlarged scales touching the infralabial at rear corner of the mouth), 3) Inflab (infralabials, posterior end defined by posteriormost enlarged scales that touches the supralabial at the rear corner of mouth), 4) SnS (snout scales, number of scales on line transversally between left and right nasal scales), 5) MBS (number of scale rows at midbody), 6) 4FL (fourth finger lamellae, number of lamellae, from 1st transversely enlarged lamellae at the base of digit to distal most lamellae), 7) 4TL (fourth toe lamellae, number of fourth toe lamellae, from the 1st lamella at the base of the digit to the distal most lamellae), 8) NC (nuchal crest, number of spines forming the nuchal crest), 9) VentSR (ventral scales counted from the posterior of post mental to the level directly above of cloacal opening), 10) VTSR (number of vertebral scales, counted from first nuchal scale to the level directly above the cloacal opening), 11) HeadSLn dorsal head scales (number of scales counted longitudinally on the midline between the interparietal and rostral scales), 12) POS (number of enlarged conical scales on the post-occipital region), 13) PTY (number of enlarged conical scales on the post-tympanic region) and 14) PRS (number of enlarged conical scales on the post-rictal region). Bilateral scale counts separated by a comma are given in left, right order. A summary of the meristic data is provided in Tables
Summary of meristic characters of Ptyctolaemus spp. Abbreviations, see “Materials and methods” section. “NA” indicates missing data.
| Characters | P. gularis (♂ = 7, ♀ = 18) | P. siangensis sp. nov. (♂ = 2, ♀ = 3) | P. namdaphaensis sp. nov. (♂ = 8, ♀ = 7) | P. chindwinensis (♂ = 3, ♀ = 1) | P. collicristatus (♂ = 5, ♀ = 2) |
| Suplab | 6–10 | 7–9 | 7–10 | 9–11 | 7–9 |
| Inflab | 6–10 | 8–9 | 7–10 | 8–10 | 7–9 |
| VentSR | 114–142 | 132–148 | 116–138 | 67–80* | 64–84* |
| VTSR | 79–114 | 89–114 | 73–110 | 89–97 | NA |
| 4FL | 19–24 | 18–27 | 21–26 | NA | NA |
| 4TL | 27–37 | 30–31 | 32–40 | 31–35 | 28–34 |
| POS | 1–9 | 2–4 | 2–7 | NA | NA |
| PTY | 1–7 | 3–6 | 3–7 | NA | NA |
| PRS | 1–5 | 1–5 | 1–4 | NA | NA |
| SnS | 3–8 | 5–6 | 4–7 | NA | NA |
| NC | 14–29 | 18–24 | 13–25 | 26–29 | 15–16 |
| CanthR | 12–15 | 13–14 | 11–16 | NA | NA |
| MBS | 71–101 | 86–105 | 90–106 | 101–113 | 76–87 |
| HeadSLn | 15–21 | 17–21 | 18–22 | NA | NA |
| *Posterior of gular to anterior opening of cloaca | |||||
Morphological data were analysed in software R (
The ND2 dataset analysed was 959 base pairs in length with 349 parsimony informative, 477 conserved and 482 variable sites. Both maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference analyses yielded the same topology (Fig.
The uncorrected p–distance between P. gularis sensu stricto and P. siangensis sp. nov. from Tibet and Arunachal Pradesh, India is 13.9–16.0%. The uncorrected p–distance between P. chindwinensis and P. namdaphaensis sp. nov. is 8.2–9.5% (Tables
Uncorrected mean p-distance (range in %) among the Ptyctolaemus species included in this study. Numbers in brackets after the species names indicate sample size. In bold, within taxon divergences.
| Species (sample size) | P. gularis | P. namdaphaensis sp. nov. | P. siangensis sp. nov. | Ptyctolaemus sp. | P. chindwinensis |
| P. gularis (10) | 2.0 (0.0–6.0) | ||||
| P. namdaphaensis sp. nov. (8) | 24.0 (22.0–24.9) | 1.0 (0.1–1.9) | |||
| P. siangensis sp. nov. (6) | 15.0 (13.9–16.0) | 25.0 (24.4–26.2) | 2.0 (0.0–4.1) | ||
| Ptyctolaemus sp. (Myanmar) (1) | 23.0 (21.1–23.2) | 9.0 (8.9–9.6) | 24.0 (23.8–25.4) | — | |
| P. chindwinensis (1) | 24.0 (22.6–24.4) | 9.0 (8.2–9.5) | 25.0 (24.9–26.3) | 9.0 | — |
| P. collicristatus (1) | 23.0 (21.9–23.3) | 26.0 (26.1–26.7) | 25.0 (23.9–25.5) | 25.0 | 26.0 |
Multivariate analyses: Principal component analysis using 28 different morphometric variables revealed the spread of morphological variation between the three lineages of Ptyctolaemus from India. Where there was overlap between the three clusters (Fig.
Body ratios: Ptyctolaemus chindwinensis and P. collicristatus have relatively broad heads compared to P. gularis, P. namdaphaensis sp. nov. and P. siangensis sp. nov. (Fig.
Visualisation (violin plot superimposed on a box plot) of body and head size ratios and meristic data of Ptyctolaemus species. Abbreviations: head width (HW), head length (HL), snout-vent length (SVL), tail length (TAL), forelimb length (FLL) and hindlimb length (HLL). Nuchal crest scales plotted only for males.
Chresonymy. Otocryptis (Ptyctolaemus) gularis Peters, 1864: 386.
ZMB 5004, from “Calcutta” [in error], purchased from J. G. W. Brandt; Figure
The type specimen, whose origin was given as “Calcutta”, was acquired by the Zoologisches Museum Berlin in the middle of the 19th century from Johann Georg Wilhelm Brandt (1794–1856), a dealer in natural history objects in Hamburg, Germany. The two additional specimens in the Museum für Naturkunde Berlin (ZMB 31134–31135) are non-types collected from “Margherita, in the Patkai Hills, Upper Assam” by Ernst Hartert in the fall of 1888. The Reptile Database (
Three adult females (
ZMB 5004 (Fig.
Mental scale triangular, broader than long, and slightly narrower than the rostral; bordered posteriorly by one infralabial on each side and two enlarged postmentals in contact with the first infralabials; postmentals medially separated by a single small gular scale; four chin shields present on each side, positioned parallel to the infralabials; the anterior portion of the first chin shield contacts the first infralabial, while the remaining part of the first and second chin shields separated from infralabial by one intervening scale row, while subsequent two chin shields separated from the infralabials by two intervening scale row; scales in the anterior region of gular feebly keeled.
Habitus slender, slightly compressed, dorsal scales keeled, imbricate, posteriorly pointed; mid-dorsal scale row strongly keeled, enlarged scales appearing discontinuously; lateral scales heterogeneous in size, mostly smaller than the dorsal, slightly keeled, imbricate, and interspersed with enlarged, strongly keeled scales; 99 vertebral scales (VTSR), 93 rows of scales around the midbody; ventral scales 135, larger than the lateral scales and approximately equal to the enlarged dorsal scales, strongly keeled, imbricate, and pointed backward.
Limbs slender, moderate sized, scales on dorsal surface strongly keeled, imbricate scales, lower arm slightly longer than the upper arm (UAL/LAL = 1.11); thigh length approximately equal to crus length (femur/crus = 1.22); scales on dorsal surface of the forelimbs strongly keeled, uniform and imbricate; scales on dorsal side of the hindlimb slightly enlarged, keeled and imbricate; scales on ventral side of the hindlimb smaller than the dorsal, slightly keeled and imbricate; relative length of digits: IV>III>II>V>I; relative length of toes: IV>III>V>II>I; 33/34 bicarinate subdigital lamellae under fourth toe.
Tail rounded in cross section, slightly compressed laterally, thick at the base, covered with homogeneous scales on the dorsal and ventral surface arranged regularly, strongly keeled and imbricate.
Dorsal surface of head brown; lateral side of head light-brown; lips pale-brown coloured; paravertebral region with feeble irregular shaped greyish patches; feeble greyish indistinct patch on lateral region; limbs brown with dark brown or greyish patches; radial stripes around the eye indistinct except for two below the eye; inner folds of gular black; ventral side of body light-brown with light-greyish spots; forelimb and hindlimbs slightly darker than the rest of the ventral region with brown light-grey; digits with indistinct bands; tail brown with indistinct greyish cross bands.
Morphometric and meristic characters are provided in Tables
Gular fold arrangement in males of the three species of Ptyctolaemus found in India. Ptyctolaemus gularis A
Mental scale triangular, broader than long, and slightly narrower than the rostral; bordered posteriorly by one infralabial on each side and two enlarged postmentals in contact with the first infralabials; postmentals followed by 1–3 small gular scale; four chin shields present on each side, positioned parallel to the infralabials; the anterior portion of the first chin shield contacts the first infralabial, while the remaining part of the first and second chin shields separated from infralabial by one intervening scale row, while subsequent two chin shields separated from the infralabials by two intervening scale row; scales in the anterior region of gular feebly keeled.
Habitus slender, slightly compressed, dorsal scales keeled, imbricate, posteriorly pointed; mid-dorsal scale row strongly keeled, enlarged scales appearing discontinuously; lateral scales heterogeneous in size, mostly smaller than the dorsal, slightly keeled, imbricate, and interspersed with enlarged, strongly keeled scales; 79–114 dorsal scales (VTSR), 71–101 rows of scales around the midbody; ventral scales 114–142, larger than the lateral scales and approximately equal to the enlarged dorsal scales, strongly keeled, imbricate, and pointed backward.
Limbs slender, moderate sized, scales on dorsal surface strongly keeled, imbricate scales, lower arm slightly longer than the upper arm (UAL/LAL = 0.84–1.01); femur length approximately equal to crus length (femur/crus = 0.95–1.08); scales on dorsal surface of the forelimbs strongly keeled, uniform and imbricate; scales on dorsal side of the hindlimb slightly enlarged, keeled and imbricate; scales on ventral side of the hindlimb smaller than the dorsal, slightly keeled and imbricate; relative length of digits: IV>III>II>V>I; relative length of toes: IV>III>V>II>I; 29–40/27–36 bicarinate subdigital lamellae under fourth toe.
Tail rounded in cross section, slightly compressed laterally, thick at the base, covered with homogeneous scales on the dorsal and ventral surface arranged regularly, strongly keeled and imbricate.
Dorsal head golden brown; greyish-white blotch on the parietal region; lateral head light brown; nostril light-greyish; enlarged keeled scales on the posterior mandibular region light coloured; lips pale greyish coloured; body golden brown coloured; paravertebral region with scattered greyish patches; greyish indistinct patch on lateral region; limbs light brown with greyish patch; radial stripes around the eye indistinct; mental white to light golden brown; inner folds of gular dark coloured, midline of gular light golden brown coloured; ventral side of forelimb and body light yellow with light greyish patch, ventral side of hindlimb light grey coloured; digits with indistinct bands; tail golden brown with indistinct greyish cross bands; scales on gular region smaller than the surrounding scales slightly heterogenous in size and mucronate, the scales in middle region are larger than those of anterior and posterior region; three distinct raised gular folds on either side of midline; folds curved towards midline posteriorly, scales on the inner folds are granular (Fig.
A medium-sized agamid lizard, SVL 46.67–79.24 mm (n = 22), TAL 101.32–181.23 mm (n = 22). Nuchal crest is poorly developed, consisting of 14–29 nuchal scales. Supratympanic spines absent. Body laterally compressed, scales at the trunk heterogeneous in size, larger than ventrals, dorsally and posteriorly oriented, 79–114 dorsal scales (VTSR), 71–101 rows of scales at midbody, 114–142 ventrals. Mental smaller than chin shields, first pair of chin shields elongated and in midline contact, the gular scales at the midline are smaller than the adjacent scales away from the midline.
Colouration in life variable (Figs
Variation in the live gular colour pattern in P. gularis. A Uncollected female from Namdapha Tiger Reserve, Arunachal Pradesh; B a female (
Ptyctolaemus gularis in life. A An adult female from Malki forest, Shillong, Meghalaya; B, C different individuals of uncollected adult males from Barail WLS, Assam; D an uncollected subadult from Barail WLS, Assam; E an uncollected male from Shillong, Meghalaya; F
Ptyctolaemus gularis in life. A
Ptyctolaemus gularis is a widely distributed agamid lizard inhabiting forested landscape of northeast India (Fig.
Chresonymy.
Ptyctolaemus aff. gularis
–
An adult female, SVL 63.65 mm and TAL 153.95 mm; TAL/SVL ratio 2.42; head distinct from neck, longer than wide (HW/HL = 0.48), slightly concave on top; rostral scale crescent; snout rounded, longer than orbital diameter (OD/EN = 0.65); pupil round, scales on the loreal region slightly keeled, surrounded by scales of irregular size and shape; nasal separated from rostral by one scale; canthus rostralis sharp, strongly keeled and consists 13 enlarged scales on each side; keels weak towards the snout; nostrils rounded, slightly laterally positioned, in contact with first supralabials; snout scales irregular in shape and size, series of six enlarged, keeled scales on the snout form an inverted “Y”-shaped pattern, with the first three anterior scales aligned along the midline and pointed posteriorly, posterior to the third scale, two scale on either side is oriented diagonally towards the superciliary ridge; head height at occipital region 9.89 mm; scales on head, snout and interorbital region heterogenous in shape and size; tympanum hidden and covered with smooth scales; neck region with small overlapping scales interspersed with enlarged scales that increase in size towards trunk; three enlarged, keeled, and elevated scales located posterior and horizontal to orbit; scales around orbital region small and irregular in shape; parietal eye is not distinct; gular in males distinct; scales on gular heterogeneous in size and mucronate, feebly keeled, scales in middle region larger than those on anterior and posterior region; three distinct raised gular folds on either side of midline; folds curved towards midline posteriorly (Fig.
Mental scale triangular, broader than long, and slightly narrower than the rostral, bordered posteriorly by one infralabial on each side and two enlarged postmentals in contact with the first infralabials; postmentals followed by two small gular scale; four chin shields present on each side, positioned parallel to the infralabials; the anterior portion of the first chin shield contacts the first infralabial, while the remaining part of the first and the subsequent two chin shields separated from the infralabials by one intervening scale row; scales in the anterior gular region feebly keeled.
Habitus slender, slightly compressed, dorsal scales keeled, imbricate, and posteriorly pointed; mid-dorsal scale row strongly keeled, enlarged scales appearing discontinuously; lateral scales heterogeneous, mostly smaller than the dorsal, feebly keeled, imbricate, and interspersed with enlarged, strongly keeled scales; 89 dorsal scales (VTSR); 87 scales around midbody; 132 ventral scales, larger than lateral scales and approximately equal to the enlarged dorsal scales, strongly keeled, imbricate, posteriorly pointed.
Limbs are slender, moderate sized, dorsal surface covered in strongly keeled, imbricate scales; lower arm length slightly longer than the upper arm length (UAL/LAL = 0.94); femur length slightly longer than the crus length (femur/crus = 1.03); scales on dorsal surface of the forelimbs strongly keeled, uniform and imbricate; scales on ventral side of the forelimbs relatively smaller, feebly keeled; relative length of digits: IV > III > II > V > I; scales on dorsal side of the hindlimb slightly enlarged, keeled and imbricate; scales on ventral side of the hindlimb smaller than the dorsal, slightly keeled and imbricate; relative length of toes: IV > III > V > II > I; 30/30 subdigital lamellae under fourth toe and bicarinate.
Tail length more than twice of SVL, rounded, slightly compressed laterally, broader at the base, gradually tapering towards tip, covered with regularly arranged strongly keeled, imbricate and homogeneous scales.
A moderate-sized lizard, SVL 66.90–77.68 mm in male (n = 2) and SVL 58.03–66.62 mm in female (n = 3), TAL 157.56–189.96 mm in male (n = 2) and 140.75–153.95 mm in female (n = 3). Snout scales irregular in shape and size with an inverted Y-shaped pattern. Nuchal crest poorly developed with 14–24 conical scales. Body slightly compressed, scales at the trunk heterogeneous in size, smaller than the dorsal, slightly keeled, oriented backwards, 89–114 dorsal scales (VTSR), 86–105 rows of scales around midbody and 132–148 ventrals. Mental broader than long, postmentals medially separated by a single small gular scale, anterior region of the first chin shield contacts the first infralabial, gular with three distinct raised gular folds on either side of midline excluding the base, gular scales heterogeneous in size, feebly keeled, scales in middle region larger than those on anterior and posterior region.
Ptyctolaemus siangensis sp. nov. can be distinguished from Ptyctolaemus collicristatus by having relatively smaller SVL/TAL ratio 0.41–0.45 (vs. 0.47–0.56; Table
Details of morphometric and meristic variation among the type series are presented in Table S3–S4. The paratypes (
Dorsal and lateral colour variable (Fig.
Dorsal and lateral head light rusty brown; greyish cross band on interorbital region; nostril and labials greyish speckled; radiating lines around the orbit dark greyish; an oblique streak from posterior margin of orbit indistinct greyish color; lateral region of neck and body greyish colored; paravertebral region same as head; thigh and upper arm rusty brown; crus and lower arm with greyish blotches; digits with dark bands; mental light brownish cream to cream towards the gular with speckles; gular on the midline creamish white with dark streaks on the inner side of folds; ventral side of forelimb, hindlimb and body brownish cream with speckles throughout; tail rusty brown with greyish patch and indistinct light bands (Fig.
Ptyctolaemus siangensis sp. nov. has high genetic divergence with its sister species P. gularis 13.9–16.0%. With other members of the genus, P. siangensis sp. nov. has 23.8–26.3% genetic difference (Table
The specific epithet is a toponym derived from the name of the river “Siang” in the state of Arunachal Pradesh.
Siang green fan-throated lizard
The holotype was found roosting on a branch of a small tree around two metres above the ground, alongside a fast-flowing hill stream at Rottung. One individual was recorded along roadside vegetation in Potin (Fig.
an adult female (
one adult male (
An adult male, SVL 81.22 mm and TAL 123.8 mm (incomplete), with a TAL/SVL ratio 1.52; head distinct from the neck, head longer than wide (HW/HL = 0.54), slightly concave on top; rostral scale crescent; snout rounded, longer than orbit (OD/EN = 0.79); scales on loreal region slightly keeled, surrounded by heterogenous scales; nasal separated from rostral by one scale; canthus rostralis sharp with 13 enlarged scales on each side; keels on canthal scales weak towards snout; nostril rounded, in contact with first supralabials; snout scales irregular in shape and size, with inverted Y-shaped pattern at the centre; head height at occipital region 12.89 mm; scales on head, snout and interorbital region heterogeneous; pupil round, horizontal orbital diameter 5.58 mm; tympanum concealed and covered with smooth scales; scales on neck overlapping and small interspersed with enlarged scales, size increases towards the trunk; three enlarged, keeled, and elevated scales behind the orbit; scales around the orbit small and irregular in shape; parietal eye is not distinct; gular distinct; scales on gular heterogeneous in size and mucronate, scales anterior to the gular pouch small, rounded, imbricate, and feebly keeled, larger in the middle; two distinct raised gular folds on either side of midline; folds curved towards midline posteriorly (Fig.
Mental scale triangular, broader than long, and slightly narrower than the rostral; bordered posteriorly by one infralabial on each side, two enlarged postmentals in contact with the first infralabials; postmentals followed by a three small gular scale; four chin shields present on each side, positioned parallel to the infralabials; the anterior portion of the first chin shield contacts the first infralabial, while the remaining part of the first chin shield are separated from the infralabials by one intervening scale row and the other subsequent three chin shields are separated from the infralabials by two intervening scale rows.
Habitus slender, slightly compressed laterally, dorsal scales keeled, imbricate, and posteriorly pointed; mid-dorsal scale row strongly keeled, interspersed with enlarged scale, no enlarged keeled scales on flank; lateral scales heterogeneous, mostly smaller than the dorsals, slightly keeled, imbricate; 104 dorsal scales (VTSR); 106 rows of scales around the midbody; 126 ventral scales, larger than lateral scales and approximately equal to the enlarged dorsal scales, strongly keeled, imbricate, posteriorly pointed.
Limbs slender, moderate sized, lower arm length slightly longer than upper arm length (UAL/LAL = 0.91); femur length equal to crus length (femur/crus = 1.01); scales on dorsal surface of forelimbs strongly keeled, uniform and imbricate; scales on ventral side of the forelimbs relatively smaller, feebly keeled; relative length of digits: IV > III > II > V > I; scales on ventral side of hindlimb smaller than dorsal side, slightly keeled and imbricate; relative length of toes: IV > III > V > II > I; 36/35 sub digital lamellae under fourth toe, bicarinate.
Tail rounded, slightly compressed laterally, thick at the base, gradually tapering towards tip; covered with homogeneous scales; scales on the dorsal and ventral surface arranged regularly, strongly keeled, and imbricate.
A moderate-sized lizard, SVL 45.9–81.2 mm in male (n = 8) and SVL 55.4–72.9 mm in female (n = 7), TAL 115.6–184.5 mm in male (n = 8) and 131.8–181 mm in female (n = 7). Snout scales irregular in shape and size with an inverted Y-shaped pattern. Nuchal crest poorly developed with 12–20 conical scales. Body slightly compressed, scales at the trunk heterogeneous in size, smaller than the dorsal, slightly keeled, oriented backwards, no enlarged keeled scales on flank region, 73–110 dorsal scales (VTSR), 90–106 rows of scales around midbody, 116–138 ventrals. Mental broader than long, two enlarged postmental in contact with the first infralabials, anterior region of the first chin shield contacts the first infralabial, gular with two distinct raised gular folds on either side of midline, gular scales heterogeneous in size, feebly keeled, scales in middle region larger than those on anterior and posterior region.
Ptyctolaemus namdaphaensis sp. nov. looks similar to P. chindwinensis, as they are sister species. Ptyctolaemus namdaphaensis sp. nov. differs from P. chindwinensis by fewer nuchal crest NC 13–25 (vs. 26–29); P. namdaphaensis sp. nov. can be distinguished from P. collicristatus by relatively larger FLL/SVL 0.50–0.58 (vs. 0.40–0.45), by relatively larger HLL/SVL 0.87–0.99 (vs. 0.64–0.73), by higher number of midbody scales MBS 90–106 (vs. 75–87). Ptyctolaemus namdaphaensis sp. nov. differs from P. gularis by gular region pale-brownish white or bluish white with three broad dark-blue stripes (vs. pale-brown or pale-bluish green or pale-yellowish green; three to four broad dark-blue stripes; Fig.
In addition, the colouration on the gular region of P. namdaphaensis sp. nov. differs from P. siangensis sp. nov. in having light grass green gular in males (vs. gular with dark blue stripes separated by narrow white lines; Fig.
Details of morphometric and meristic variation among the type series are presented in Tables S4 and S5. The paratypes (
Adult males have a nuchal crest; gular in males green while the females have pale-yellow gular without any spots (Fig.
Head brown or greyish brown or pale-yellowish brown with dark-brown spots; scales with golden yellow keels; pale bands on dorsal surface of head indistinct; dark edged light short streaks radiating from eye; an oblique streak extends from the posterior margin of eye to angle of jaw; lips pale-brown; paravertebral uniform light brown; lateral and dorsal side of neck pale-yellowish brown with irregular dark-brown spots; gular region light grass green with black spots (Fig.
Dorsal head light brown with darks tiny spots; light greyish cross band between interorbital region; lateral head light brown with light greyish patch; nostril greyish with tiny black spots; lateral head light brown with greyish patch; enlarged keeled scales on the posterior mandibular region light coloured; few scales on the neck and lateral body with black tips; body light brown to rusty brown coloured; paravertebral region bluish grey coloured; greyish indistinct patch on lateral region; limbs light brown with greyish patch; dark brown patch on the limbs are visible; radial stripes around the eye visible; mantle creamish white with series of black spots forming irregular line; gular region pale bluish coloured; ventral side of forelimb, hindlimb and body creamish with greyish patch, black spots scattered throughout; tail dark brown with indistinct light bands; light bands on the digits visible (Fig.
Ptyctolaemus namdaphaensis sp. nov. has high genetic divergence to its sister species P. chindwinensis 8.2–9.5%. With other members of the genus, P. siangensis sp. nov. has 8.9–26.7% genetic difference (Table
The specific epithet is a toponym derived from the name of the place “Namdapha Tiger Reserve” in the state of Arunachal Pradesh, India.
Namdapha green fan-throated lizard.
We recorded individuals of this species in the following locations: Deban, Motijheel, Gibbon’s Land and Kamala valley in the Namdapha Tiger Reserve (Fig.
The true identity of P. gularis has been a conundrum for taxonomists (
Among the three species found in northeast India the dewlap colouration in P. namdaphaensis sp. nov. is distinct from that of P. gularis and P. siangensis sp. nov. Ptyctolaemus namdaphaensis sp. nov. is most likely the second species in which females lack colouration on the dewlap, a dimorphism which was first reported in P. chindwinensis (
The mitochondrial ND2 gene is widely used to distinguish between agamid species (
Studies focusing on the evolution of sexual dimorphism in agamids have found that natural selection constrains the evolution of elaborate ornaments in both sexes, as well as sexual dichromatism of body regions exposed to visual predators. In contrast, dichromatism of ‘hidden’ body regions and the degree of ornament dimorphism appear to be driven to a greater extent by sexual selection (
Some of the agamid lizard genera found in northeast India, which were once considered species-poor and widespread, have been found to comprise multiple species (e.g., Calotes;
We thank the National Geographic Society for the award of National Geographic Explorer Grant (NGS-74044R-20) and SERB-DST (CRG/2018/000790) for funding. We are grateful to the Forest Department of Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Meghalaya, Mizoram and Nagaland for giving us research permission to carry out the study (vide letter nos. FWC/G/173/Pt-111/3897-908 dated 9 February 2016; CWL/GEN/13(95)/11-12/Pt.V/438-40 dated 2 May 2018; CWL/G/173/2018-19/Pt.VII/1100-07 dated 22 August 2019; WL/FG.31/Technical Committee/2019, dated 18 July 2019; B.19060/1/2020-CWLW/112 dated 2 February 2021. We thank Sh. Aduk Paron (former director, Namdapha Tiger reserve), Sh. Tajum Yomcha (APFD) and Sh. Mayur Variya (Biologist, Namdapha Tiger Reserve), Kabuk Lego (Range Officer, Mehao WLS) for their support. We are thankful to the Director and Dean, Wildlife Institute of India for constant support. We thank Jason D. Gerard for help in initial data verification and lab work. We thank Sourav Dutta, Naitik G. Patel, Rajiv N.V., Vijayan Jithin, Krishnendu Banerjee, Santanu Dey, John Tayeng, Aphu Yoha Yobin, Akhida, Lishi Gunia, Late Teibor Marwein, Isaac Rayen, Asim Basir, Isaac Zosangliana, Lalhmangaiha Khiangte, Malsawmdawngliana for their help during field work. We thank the three reviewers and the editor for their valuable comments on the previous draft of this manuscript.
Figures S1–S3
Data type: .docx
Explanation notes: Figure S1. Principal component analyses results for the first eight axes plotted by sexes. — Figure S2. Paratype of P. siangensis sp. nov. — Figure S3. Paratype of P. namdaphaensis sp. nov.
Tables S1–S6
Data type: .xlsx
Explanation notes: Table S1. PCA factor loadings. — Table S2. Shapiro-Wilk normality test for the 25 variables used in this study — Table S3. Distributional information for specimens examined in this study. — Table S4. Morphological characters of the two newly described Ptyctolaemus species and Ptyctolaemus gularis. — Table S5. Meristic characters of the two newly described Ptyctolaemus species and Ptyctolaemus gularis. — Table S6. Uncorrected mean P-distance among the Ptyctolaemus species included in this study.