Research Article
Print
Research Article
Geographic structuring and species limits in Phylloderma stenops (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae): Revalidation of P. septentrionalis in Central America
expand article infoM. Alejandra Camacho§, Santiago F. Burneo, Daniel Cadar|, Balázs Horváth|, Gábor E. Tóth|, Jerome Murienne§
‡ Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Quito, Ecuador
§ Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| WHO Collaborating Centre for Arbovirus and Haemorrhagic Fever Reference and Research, Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, Hamburg, Germany
Open Access

Abstract

We investigated the taxonomic diversity of the pale-faced bat Phylloderma stenops (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae) across South and Central America using morphological analyses and complete mitochondrial genomes. Phylogenetic reconstructions revealed two highly supported clades, with Central American populations showing consistent genetic divergence from South American lineages. Morphological comparisons corroborated this distinction, particularly in cranial and dental traits, supporting the recognition of the northern lineage as Phylloderma septentrionalis Goodwin, 1940. Our results indicate that P. septentrionalis represents a valid species restricted to northern Central America, while P. stenops sensu stricto is distributed from Panama southwards. The genome skimming approach proved effective for recovering complete mitogenomes from both recent and historical specimens, enabling robust phylogenetic inference despite limited sample sizes. These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that geographic features in Central America may have contributed to lineage divergence within Phylloderma, although the exact barrier and transition zone remain to be evaluated with samples from Costa Rica. The results also underscore the importance of integrating morphological and molecular data to reassess taxonomic limits in poorly sampled Neotropical bats. The recognition of P. septentrionalis refines the taxonomy and geographic limits of Phylloderma in Central America and provides a framework for future studies using broader geographic sampling and genomic data.

Keywords

Biogeographic barriers, evolutionary diversification, genome skimming, integrative taxonomy, mitochondrial genomes, Phyllostominae, species delimitation

Introduction

The Neotropical region encompasses diverse ecosystems and is home to exceptional biodiversity. Within this region, Central America, which contains the Mesoamerican Biodiversity Hotspot (Mittermeier et al. 2011), supports a high richness of bat species. Despite this, the region’s biodiversity has been underestimated due to factors such as cryptic diversity (Navarro et al. 2001; Fouquet et al. 2007; Arteaga et al. 2012), uneven research efforts across countries, and political instability (Crawford et al. 2007; Castellanos 2019). As a result, estimates of bat diversity are being updated and the current bat species count for the region is on the rise (Garbino et al. 2024; López-Cuamatzi et al. 2024).

The diversity and high endemism of Central America have been attributed to a complex biogeographical history resulting from geological transformations that have created barriers to dispersal, such as high elevations and topographic depressions (Briggs 1994; Marshall 2007; Escalante and Morrone 2020; Patterson 2020). Key barriers affecting the distribution of species include the Talamanca Cordillera (uplifted during the Pliocene), the Isthmus of Tehuantepec, partially flooded during the Plio-Pleistocene boundary (Barrier et al. 1998; Mulcahy et al. 2006), the Motagua-Polochic Fault (uplifted during the Late Miocene), the Nicaraguan Depression (partially flooded during the Mio-Pliocene transition), the Central Panamanian Lowlands, and the Darien Highlands (Marshall 2007; Castellanos 2019; Molinari et al. 2023). Historical species exchanges and climatic cycles from the Plio-Pleistocene eras, along with altitude-linked refuges, have also enriched Central America’s biodiversity (Smith et al. 2007; Suárez-Atilano et al. 2014; Hernández-Canchola and León-Paniagua 2017; Castellanos 2019).

The bat family Phyllostomidae, which is restricted to the tropics and subtropics of the New World, represents the most diverse chiropteran group of the Neotropical Region. It currently includes 61 genera and 230 species occupying a very wide range of habitats (Solari et al. 2019; MDD 2026). Within Phyllostomidae, the subfamily Phyllostominae includes 10 genera, namely Chrotopterus, Gardnerycteris, Lophostoma, Macrophyllum, Mimon, Phylloderma, Phyllostomus, Trachops, Tonatia, and Vampyrum (Baker et al. 2016).

Phylloderma has historically been treated as a monotypic genus within Phyllostominae. Known as the pale-faced bat, P. stenops (Peters, 1865) has a wide distribution in the Neotropics, adapting to various forest habitats; however, its ecological role, behavioral patterns, morphological and genetic diversity have not been fully studied (Carter et al. 1966; Williams and Genoways 2008; Martínez-Cerón et al. 2019; Solari et al. 2019). The species can be easily distinguished from other members of Phyllostominae by a unique combination of characters such as the presence of two pairs of lower incisors, three lower premolars, rostrum shorter than the braincase, and pale wing tips (Williams and Genoways 2008). Despite resembling Phyllostomus, Phylloderma stenops is identifiable by its unique nose-leaf attached to the lip, by having three lower premolars instead of two, and by its notably paler face (Trujillo and Albuja 2005; Bomfim et al. 2017; de Souza et al. 2022). The taxonomy of Phylloderma stenops recognizes three subspecies based on morphology and distribution: P. s. stenops (Peters, 1865) from Panama to Brazil; P. s. septentrionalis Goodwin, 1940 from Mexico to Costa Rica; and P. s. boliviensis Bárquez & Ojeda, 1979 from southeastern Bolivia.

Recent morphological and molecular studies have revealed unrecognized diversity often structured geographically, underscoring the need for systematic reassessment of widespread taxa (Fišer et al. 2018; Bickford et al. 2007). In the case of Phylloderma, geographic variation across the Andes and Central America suggests that current subspecific limits may underestimate true species diversity (Martínez-Cerón et al. 2019).

Species delimitation in bats has traditionally relied on mitochondrial markers such as cytochrome b (cyt b) and cytochrome oxidase I (COI), which offer rapid and cost-effective insights into genetic divergence (Baker and Bradley 2006; Clare et al. 2007). These markers have proven useful in identifying cryptic lineages and informing taxonomic revisions across diverse bat genera. However, their single-locus nature and susceptibility to introgression or incomplete lineage sorting limit their resolution in complex phylogenetic scenarios.

In recent years, mitogenome skimming, a low-coverage sequencing aimed at recovering complete mitochondrial genomes, has emerged as an alternative that can improve phylogenetic resolution relative to single-gene approaches. Although still less commonly applied in bat taxonomy, mitogenomes can provide enhanced resolution and support in groups with subtle morphological divergence (Camacho et al. 2024). Nevertheless, mitogenome skimming remains limited by its mitochondrial scope and does not capture nuclear variation.

This study investigates phylogenetic relationships and taxonomic uncertainties in Phylloderma by integrating morphology and complete mitochondrial genomes. Morphological analyses focused on craniodental traits, and phylogenetic reconstructions were based on mitogenomic datasets obtained from low-coverage sequencing approaches (Straub et al. 2012; Camacho et al. 2022, 2024). Our taxonomic decisions follow the General Lineage Concept of species (de Queiroz 2007), under which species are independently evolving phyletic lineages. Operationally, and consistent with Simpson (1951) as modified by Molinari (2023), we recognize species based on congruent evidence of evolutionary independence inferred from heritable morphological characters, genetic markers, or both.

Using this framework, we combine craniodental morphology with mitogenome skimming to assess diversity and taxonomic uncertainty in Phylloderma, a genus with contrasting morphological and genetic patterns, and discuss its implications for bat taxonomy in Central America. We discuss geographic and geological features of Central America as a biogeographic context for interpreting the observed mitogenomic divergence in this genus, while recognizing that their role was not directly tested in this study.

Materials and Methods

Biological samples and natural history repositories

We included samples from most of the geographical distribution of Phylloderma stenops in South and Central America (Fig. 1). Morphological analysis included samples of all the named subspecies; in the case of the genetic analysis, DNA sequences could not be retrieved for P. s. boliviensis.

Figure 1. 

Geographic localities of Phylloderma specimens analyzed in this study. Circles represent specimens measured for morphological analyses, squares represent sequenced specimens, and diamonds represent specimens that were both measured and sequenced. Detailed locality information is provided in Table SS1.

For the morphometric analyses, we examined 58 specimens of Phylloderma from the following collections: AMNH, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY, USA; FML, Colección de Mamíferos, Fundación Miguel Lillo, Tucumán, Argentina; IAvH, Colección de Mamíferos del Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt, Villa de Leyva, Colombia; MEPN, Museo de Historia Natural Gustavo Orcés, Escuela Politécnica Nacional, Quito, Ecuador; QCAZ, Museo de Zoología, División de Mastozoología, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Quito, Ecuador; USNM, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, USA; UV, Colección de Mamíferos de la Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia (Table SS1).

We obtained tissue samples from 18 Phylloderma specimens that are housed at QCAZ or were loaned from the AMNH; FMNH, Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, IL, USA; MSB, Museum of Southwestern Biology, Albuquerque, NM, USA; and ROM, Royal Ontario Museum, Toronto, Canada (Table SS1).

Lastly, we included published information of locality data and measurements, listed in Medellín et al. (1986), Sánchez-Palomino et al. (1993), Trujillo and Albuja (2005), Esbérard and Faria (2006), Santos-Moreno and Gallardo (2014), Medina-Fitoria et al. (2015), Bomfim et al. (2017), Martínez-Cerón et al. (2019), and Verde et al. (2021) (Table SS1).

Molecular data

We gathered a set of 18 tissue samples from Phylloderma (Table 1). Some of these samples were old, dating from 1935. The tissues included heart or liver (c. 40 mg), claws (c. 3 mm), and biopsy punch wing snippets (c. 3 x 3 mm diameter).

Table 1.

Specimens, localities, and mitogenomic data used in this study. List of specimens used in the present study, including voucher identification, GenBank accession numbers, mitogenome characteristics, country, and geographic coordinates.

Museum number Species ID GenBank accession number Mitogenome mean coverage Mitogenome length Country Latitude & Longitude
AMNH-124834 P. s. septentrionalis PZ428432 127.47 16557 Honduras 14°5.55'N, 87°12.04'W
AMNH-126867 P. s. septentrionalis PZ428433 24.39 16557 Honduras 14°18.00'N, 87°50.00'W
AMNH-205371 P. s. stenops PV933985 8.34 16609 Trinidad and Tobago 10°38.25'N, 61°16.93'W
AMNH-266077 P. s. stenops PV946934 9.17 16563 French Guiana 5°17.00'N, 52°55.00'W
FMNH-170089 P. s. stenops PV946935 142.23 16623 Peru 12°40.10'S, 71°16.14'W
QCAZ-18527 P. s. stenops PP461486 226.13 16601 Ecuador 1°0.47'S, 76°11.18'W
ROM-104225 P. s. stenops PV946936 281.51 16653 Panama 9°4.46'N, 79°39.59'W
ROM-104693 P. s. stenops PV946937 607.41 16633 Guyana 4°39.64'N, 58°40.84'W
ROM-111529 P. s. stenops PV946938 528.52 16616 Guyana 4°17.00'N, 58°31.00'W
ROM-112628 P. s. stenops PV946939 199.94 16602 Guyana 6°29.94'N, 58°13.12'W
ROM-117511 P. s. stenops PV946940 215.72 16690 Suriname 4°44.44'N, 56°48.10'W
ROM-120383 P. s. stenops PV976855 276.36 16604 Suriname 1°59.67'N, 56°5.53'W
ROM-121025 P. s. stenops PV976856 55.02 16598 Suriname 5°6.21'N, 54°30.99'W
ROM-125158 P. s. stenops PV976857 10.77 16590 Peru 5°26.10'S, 79°48.17'W
ROM-98903 P. s. stenops PV976858 143.38 16607 Guyana 7°31.00'N, 59°23.00'W
QCAZ-18512 G. crenulata PV976859 213.03 16580 Ecuador 0°59.79'S, 76°12.21'W
QCAZ-18699 T. bakeri PV976860 14.19 16634 Ecuador 0°10.02'N, 78°53.28'W
QCAZ-18135 V. spectrum PV976861 63.66 16674 Ecuador 1°3.80'S, 76°12.77'W
QCAZ-17594 C. auritus PV976862 56.17 16779 Ecuador 4°22.11'S, 79°53.97'W
QCAZ-18335 T. cirrhosus PP410143 83 16579 Ecuador 0°55.51'S, 79°45.68'W
QCAZ-15869 M. macrophyllum PP461487 17.21 16785 Ecuador 0°0.58'S, 76°10.90'W
QCAZ-18297 P. discolor ON357733 3482 16692 Ecuador 0°1.81'S, 78°40.84'W
QCAZ-18085 L. nicaraguae ON310506 5931 16653 Ecuador 0°16.26'S, 79°8.59'W
MVZ-185587 L. aurita KU743908 1192.5 16661 Brazil 6°42.85'S, 35°10.98'W
QCAZ-18230 G. soricina ON321893 3055 16529 Ecuador 0°50.78'S, 79°11.48'W
QCAZ-18236 L. robusta ON357721 6901 16666 Ecuador 0°54.70'S, 79°12.44'W

Complete mitochondrial genome sequencing and assembly was performed using a genome skimming procedure, as recently performed for other Phyllostomidae groups (Camacho et al. 2022, 2024). Laboratory procedures were carried out at the NGS Core Facility of the Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine in Hamburg. The extraction and amplification of DNA were performed in a dedicated clean room facility. Contamination prevention protocols and negative controls were also implemented. The DNA extraction process for various sample types (dried skin, ethanol, or formaldehyde-preserved tissues) involved proteinase K digestion at 55°C using 20 µl of proteinase K and 220 µl of ATL lysis buffer (MinElute Reaction Cleanup kit, Qiagen). Prior to digestion, the samples were thoroughly washed with nuclease-free water (Qiagen). The incubation time for proteinase K digestion varied depending on the tissue type and sample preservation, ranging from 5 to 24 hours. Following digestion, DNA was extracted and purified using the Qiagen MinElute kit, with each sample eluted to a final volume of 60 µl. DNA concentration was measured using Qubit and Bioanalyzer instruments. For library preparation, the QIAseq FX DNA Library Kit (Qiagen) was used, with double index barcode labeling according to the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA fragmentation was often avoided due to the high degradation of nucleic acid (DNA ≤ 500 bp) material and low concentration (≤ 3 ng/µl). The HiFi PCR Master Mix from the QIAseq FX kit was utilized to amplify DNA regions with varying GC contents, minimizing sequencing bias caused by PCR, such as nucleotide misincorporations from cytosine deamination. The libraries underwent quality control to determine fragment size by using the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer, and the concentration was assessed using a Qubit 2.0 Fluorometer. After normalization, the samples and negative controls were pooled and subjected to sequencing on the NextSeq 2000 platform (2 × 100 cycles) (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). A detailed description of the whole protocol, including extraction and library preparation, is available at protocols.io (https://doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.5jyl8q3r7l2w/v1)

Raw reads were first subjected to a qualitative assessment, followed by the removal of adaptor sequences and the filtration of polyclonal and low-quality reads (<55 bases long) using CLC Genomics Workbench 24 (Qiagen; https://digitalinsights.qiagen.com). Overlapping paired-end (PE) reads were merged to improve quality, while non-overlapping pairs and orphan reads were left unchanged. Deduplication was performed with an assumed 100% identity using BBTools v.39.27 (Bushnell 2014), expanding the length of contigs produced during de novo assembly. Custom assembly was conducted using MEGAHIT v.1.2.9 (Li et al. 2016) and SPAdes v.4.1.0 (Prjibelski et al. 2020; Wang et al. 2021) applications. All the assembled mitochondrial genomes were annotated using the MITOS2 metazoan pipeline (Al Arab et al. 2017), followed by visual inspection and manual adjustment in GENEIOUS v.9.0.5 (https://www.geneious.com).

Ribosomal RNA (rRNA) and transfer RNA (tRNA) loci were aligned using MUSCLE (Edgar 2004), whereas protein-coding gene sequences were aligned using TranslatorX (Abascal et al. 2010). We used the optimal partitioning schemes previously estimated by Camacho et al. (2022). The phylogenetic analysis was conducted using 38 partitions: one partition for rRNA genes, one partition for tRNA genes, and 36 partitions corresponding to the three codon positions of each of the 12 protein-coding genes. Phylogenetic relationships were inferred under maximum likelihood (ML) in RAxML-NG v.1.2.0 (Kozlov et al. 2019), using a partitioned GTR+I+G model selected under the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC). The analysis was started from 10 random and 10 parsimony trees. Nodal support was estimated using both Felsenstein bootstrap proportions (FBP) and transfer bootstrap expectation (TBE) (Lemoine et al. 2018), with the autoMRE bootstopping criterion. Bootstrapping converged after 200 replicates. Support values are reported in Figure 2 as FBP/TBE, both expressed as percentages. Trees were visualized and edited in FigTree v.1.4.4 (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree). Bootstrap values of 75% and higher indicated robust support, 50–75% indicated moderate support, and 50% or lower indicated minimal support (Moratelli et al. 2017). Finally, we estimated evolutionary divergence between groups in MEGA 11 (Tamura et al. 2021) as the mean number of base differences per site averaged over all sequence pairs between groups, with among-site rate heterogeneity modeled using a gamma distribution.

Figure 2. 

Maximum likelihood phylogeny of Phylloderma based on complete mitochondrial genomes inferred with RAxML-NG under a partitioned GTR+I+G model. Node labels indicate Felsenstein bootstrap support and transfer bootstrap expectation shown as percentages (FBP/TBE). Values ≥ 75% were considered to indicate robust support. The scale bar represents substitutions per site.

To root the phylogenetic analysis and ensure broad taxonomic representation, we selected outgroups that included at least one representative of each genus within the subfamily Phyllostominae (except Mimon, for which no complete mitochondrial genome was available), as well as one representative from the subfamilies Lonchophyllinae and Glossophaginae (Table 1), whose phylogenetic relationships to Phyllostominae are unclear (Camacho et al. 2022). We newly sequenced complete mitochondrial genomes from Gardnerycteris crenulata (QCAZ18512), Tonatia bakeri (QCAZ18699), Vampyrum spectrum (QCAZ18135), Macrophyllum macrophyllum (QCAZ15869), and Chrotopterus auritus (QCAZ17594). In addition, we retrieved six complete mitogenomes from GenBank: Trachops cirrhosus (PP410143), Lonchorhina aurita (KU743908), Glossophaga soricina (ON321893), Lophostoma nicaraguae (ON310506), Lonchophylla robusta (ON357721), and Phyllostomus discolor (ON357733). This outgroup sampling was intended to minimize the effect of any single outgroup on tree rooting; the taxonomic conclusions of this study are based on the reciprocal monophyly and genetic divergence of the Phylloderma lineages, rather than on the deeper relationships among outgroups.

Morphological data

We examined 58 Phylloderma specimens to obtain external and craniodental measurements. Only fully mature individuals were included, ensuring consistency by excluding subadult stages (Kunz et al. 1996; Novaes et al. 2021).

For each specimen, 26 metrics were recorded, including 16 craniomandibular and 10 external measurements. Total length (TL), tail length (T), hind foot (HF), ear length (E), and mass (W) were obtained from specimen tags when available. The measurements were taken by a single observer (M.A.C.) across all museum visits with a digital caliper (0.01 mm precision) and following a standardized protocol (measurement landmarks and orientation kept constant) to minimize observer-related variance. The measurements of P. stenops boliviensis specimens from the FML (n = 2) were provided by the curator of this museum. Because the Bolivian sample size was very small, these specimens were not included in multivariate analyses and were considered only for descriptive comparisons.

We adopted the cranial and dental terminology proposed by Velazco (2005), Tavares et al. (2014), and Garbino et al. (2020). For lower premolars, we followed the nomenclature of Miller (1907) and Cirranello et al. (2016), recognizing three teeth (p2, p3, and p4), with absent p1. We used standard abbreviations for tooth position, with upper-case letters for upper teeth and lower-case letters for lower teeth: I/i, upper/lower incisors; C/c, upper/lower canines; P/p, upper/lower premolars; M/m, upper/lower molars; and tooth positions indicated by numbers.

The external and craniomandibular measurements, and their abbreviations and descriptions are as follows: calcar length (CL), distance from the joint with the ankle to the tip of the calcar; ear length (E), distance from the inter-tragic notch of the ear to its tip; forearm length (FA), distance from the elbow (external edge of the olecranon process) to the wrist (including the carpals); hindfoot length (HF), distance from the ankle to the tip of the claws; metacarpal III (MET-III), distance from the joint to the wrist (carpal bones) with the 3rd metacarpal to the metacarpophalangeal joint of the 3rd digit; metacarpal IV (MET-IV), distance from the joint of the wrist (carpal bones) and the 4th metacarpal to the metacarpophalangeal joint of the 4th digit; metacarpal V (MET-V), distance from the joint of the wrist (carpal bones) and the 5th metacarpal to the metacarpophalangeal joint of the 5th digit; tail length (T), distance from the base of the tail to its tip; tibia length (TiL), distance from the proximal end of the tibia to the distal base of the calcar; total length (TL), head and body length excluding tail; weight (W), body mass in grams; braincase height (BCH), height of the braincase, posteriorly to the auditory bullae, from the basioccipital bone to the sagittal crest; breadth across upper molars (M2-M2), greatest breadth of the palate across the labial margins of the alveoli of M2s; breadth of brain case (BB), greatest breadth of the globular part of the braincase, excluding the mastoid and paraoccipital processes; condylocanine length (CCL), distance from the occipital condyles to the anterior border of the upper canines; condyloincisive length (CIL), distance between a line connecting the posteriormost margins of the occipital condyles and the anteriormost edge of the upper incisors; coronoid height (COH), perpendicular height from the ventral margin of the mandible to the tip of the coronoid process; dentary length (DENL), distance from the midpoint of the condyle to the anteriormost point of the dentary; greatest length of skull (GLS), distance from the occiput to the anteriormost edge of the premaxilla (including the incisors); mandibular toothrow length (MANDL), distance from the anteriormost edge of the lower canine to the posteriormost edge of m3; mastoid (process) breadth (MPW), greatest breadth across the skull, including the mastoid processes; maxillary toothrow (MTRL), distance from the anteriormost edge of the upper canine to the posteriormost edge of the crown of M3; molariform toothrow (MLTRL), distance from the anteriormost edge of P3 to the posteriormost edge of the crown of M3; palatal width at canines (C-C), distance between the outermost edges of the cinguli of upper canines; palatal length (PL), distance from the posterior palatal notch to the anteriormost edge of the incisive alveoli; postorbital constriction breadth (PB), least breadth at the postorbital constriction; zygomatic breadth (ZB), greatest breadth across the zygomatic arches.

Descriptive statistics (mean, range and standard deviation) were calculated for all measurements. Only craniomandibular metrics were used in statistical analyses. Missing measurements represented 3% of the morphometric dataset and were estimated using multiple imputation in the SPSS Statistics v. 20 software (IBM Corp. 2011). Data normality was assessed using logarithmic transformation and the Shapiro-Wilk test, which is effective for small to moderate sample sizes. Molecular findings guided an exploratory ANOVA to assess size differences across sexes within phylogroups. The Panamanian-South American form was treated as distinct from the Honduran form (P. s. septentrionalis). Phylloderma stenops boliviensis was excluded due to the limited number of specimens. The analysis focused on the greatest length of the skull (GLS). Because no marked size differences between sexes were detected, males and females were pooled for subsequent morphometric analyses. Using the same phylogroups, morphometric variation in 16 craniomandibular dimensions was assessed using independent-samples t-tests on log10-transformed measurements. Homogeneity of variances was evaluated with Levene’s test; however, given the strongly unbalanced sample sizes between groups, we report Welch’s t-test results (equal variances not assumed) for all comparisons as a conservative and robust approach.

Finally, to evaluate whether morphometric differentiation reflected proportional cranial differences rather than only overall size, we calculated Mosimann size-adjusted variables as the natural logarithm of each measurement minus the individual mean of all log-transformed measurements. A principal component analysis was then performed on these Mosimann variables in R (R Core Team 2026).

Results

Phylogeny

We successfully sequenced 15 Phylloderma mitogenomes (Table SS1). The phylogenetic analysis recovered two highly supported clades: one containing individuals distributed from Panama to South America, corresponding to P. stenops (Clade 1; Fig. 2), and another from Honduras, corresponding to the northern Central American lineage historically treated as P. s. septentrionalis (Clade 2; Fig. 2). Mitogenomic sequence divergence estimates revealed substantial genetic differentiation between these taxa. A complete mitogenome genetic distance of 8.60% was observed between P. stenops sensu stricto and the northern Central American lineage here revalidated as P. septentrionalis (Table 2).

Table 2.

Estimates of evolutionary divergence between taxa. Values represent the mean number of base differences per site averaged over all sequence pairs between groups and are reported as percentages. Among-site rate heterogeneity was modeled using gamma distribution. Distances are based on complete mitochondrial genomes.

Species 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
1 M. macrophyllum
2 Trachops cirrhosus 18.12
3 Phylloderma stenops 19.38 18.76
4 P. septentrionalis 19.52 18.70 8.60
5 Phyllostomus discolor 18.23 17.20 15.26 15.21
6 Gardnerycteris crenulata 18.10 17.06 16.47 16.51 14.53
7 Tonatia bakeri 18.23 17.04 16.61 16.59 15.20 15.86
8 Lophostoma nicaraguae 17.82 16.93 16.49 16.53 15.02 15.50 15.53
9 Vampyrum spectrum 19.52 19.64 18.42 18.53 17.59 18.47 17.77 17.82
10 Chrotopterus auritus 20.56 20.39 19.59 19.70 18.89 19.84 19.71 18.98 16.31
11 Lonchorhina aurita 18.94 18.09 18.78 19.19 17.77 17.89 17.56 17.67 18.71 20.04
12 Glossophaga soricina 19.01 18.06 20.18 20.43 18.34 18.42 18.40 18.11 20.29 21.15 18.80
13 Lonchophylla robusta 19.83 18.88 18.94 18.94 17.82 18.41 18.23 17.87 17.72 19.46 18.27 18.72

Morphometric findings

Phylloderma septentrionalis is larger in craniomandibular and external measurements than P. s. stenops and P. s. boliviensis (Table 3). Log10-transformed variables met normality assumptions (Shapiro–Wilk, P > 0.05). An exploratory ANOVA using GLS as the dependent variable detected no significant size differences between sexes within phylogroups (P > 0.05), therefore, males and females were pooled. Because sample sizes were strongly unbalanced between phylogroups, we report Welch’s independent-samples t-tests (equal variances not assumed) for all craniomandibular comparisons. Welch’s t-tests indicated significant differences between P. septentrionalis and P. stenops across the examined cranial dimensions (Table 4), supporting the usefulness of craniometric traits for distinguishing these taxa.

Table 3.

Descriptive measurements (in mm) for Phylloderma septentrionalis, P. stenops stenops, and P. stenops boliviensis analyzed in this study. Values include arithmetic mean, range (minimum–maximum), and standard deviation (in parentheses). Measurements for P. s. boliviensis correspond to the two type series specimens FML 383 and FML 413, respectively.

Measurement P. septentrionalis P. s. stenops P. s. boliviensis
(n = 6) (n = 50) (n = 2)
Breadth of brain case (BB) 13.80, 13.57–13.97 (0.18) 12.96, 12.19–13.67 (0.35) 12.78; 13.22
Palatal width at canines (C-C) 6.97, 6.77–7.09 (0.13) 6.40, 5.87–7.13 (0.36) 6.32; 6.19
Condylocanine length (CCL) 29.32, 29.08–29.64 (0.19) 26.98, 24.93–29.06 (1.10) 27.01; 27.01
Condyloincisive length (CIL) 30.62, 30.47–30.88 (0.2) 28.24, 26.09–30.34 (1.14) 28.8; 27.3
Coronoid height (COH) 8.66, 8.55–8.79 (0.09) 8.02, 7.07–9.19 (0.53) 8.67; 8.48
Dentary length (DENL) 22.04, 21.59–22.39 (0.29) 20.14, 18.31–21.83 (0.95) 19.97; 20.34
Greatest length of skull (GLS) 34.55, 34.13–35.3 (0.50) 31.60, 29.64–33.81 (1.08) 30.95; 31.33
Breadth across upper molars (M2-M2) 10.66, 10.4–10.82 (0.15) 9.75, 8.66–10.74 (0.51) 9.63; 9.28
Mandibular toothrow length (MANDL) 12.2, 11.67–13.63 (0.72) 11.28, 10.4–11.96 (0.41) 11.54; 11.45
Molariform toothrow (MLTRL) 6.93, 6.8–7.07 (0.11) 6.63, 6.18–7.1 (0.23) 8.32; 8.26
Mastoid (process) breadth (MPW) 15.83, 15.77–15.98 (0.10) 14.11, 13.09–15.78 (0.56) 14.52; 14.35
Maxillary toothrow (MTRL) 11.31, 10.91–12.73 (0.7) 10.34, 9.5–11.04 (0.39) 10.56; 10.17
Postorbital constriction breadth (PB) 9.50, 9.29–9.73 (0.20) 8.97, 8.3–9.47 (0.26) 8.68; 8.77
Palatal length (PL) 15.11, 14.99–15.29 (0.16) 13.60, 12.05–15.18 (0.77) 13.37; 13.76
Zygomatic breadth (ZB) 17.32, 16.73–17.69 (0.34) 15.52, 14.21–16.85 (0.69) 15.25; 15.9
Braincase height (BCH) 11.96, 11.56–12.54 (0.42) 11.31, 10.11–13.56 (0.57) 12.83; 13.51
Calcar length (CL) 18.25 14.44, 11.05–17.73 (1.60) 14.14; 13.08
Forearm length (FA) 76.28, 65.43–81.64 (5.59) 71.37, 63.72–77.77 (3.20) 73.2; 73.2
Hindfoot length (HF) 20.07, 11.4–23 (4.31) 19.25, 14–23 (2.15) 20.12; 18.04
Metacarpal III (MET-III) 77.53, 73.06–81.6 (3.53) 67.32, 61.7–73.8 (2.96) 65.34; 66.81
Metacarpal IV (MET-IV) 76.21, 72.63–80.33 (3.17) 66.62, 58.73–72.96 (3.18) 64.88; 65.42
Metacarpal V (MET-V) 79.08, 75.17–83.05 (3.45) 69.17, 63.28–76.76 (3.22) 66.72; 67.83
Tibia length (TiL) 31.08, 29.5–32.73 (1.62) 29.02, 25.83–33.3 (4.40) 29.62; 28.46
Tail length (T) 16.88, 11.49–21 (4.45) 18.65, 7.44–25 (3.9) 14.65; 15.15
Total length (TL) 114.10, 109.6–130 (8.05) 112.34, 81–128 (10.37) 140; 140
Ear length (E) 26.69, 22.11–31 (3.36) 26.24, 15–32 (2.98) 21.7; 23.2
Table 4.

Independent-samples comparisons between Phylloderma septentrionalis and P. stenops based on 16 log10-transformed craniomandibular measurements. Values are mean ± SD. Statistical results correspond to Welch’s t-tests used for all variables due to unbalanced sample sizes. Significant P-values (α = 0.05) are indicated.

Trait P. stenops mean ± SD (n = 50) P. septentrionalis mean ± SD (n = 6) Test statistic df P-value Significant? (α = 0.05)
BB 1.1126 ± 0.01172 1.1339 ± 0.01196 t = –4.138 6.210 0.006 Yes
CC 0.8057 ± 0.02411 0.8541 ± 0.02707 t = –4.178 5.992 0.006 Yes
CCL 1.4305 ± 0.01754 1.4732 ± 0.01318 t = –7.212 7.317 < 0.001 Yes
CIL 1.4505 ± 0.01728 1.4916 ± 0.01201 t = –7.499 7.742 < 0.001 Yes
COH 0.9030 ± 0.02851 0.9450 ± 0.01872 t = –4.854 8.105 0.001 Yes
DENL 1.3038 ± 0.02037 1.3507 ± 0.01931 t = –5.590 6.412 0.001 Yes
GLS 1.5003 ± 0.01506 1.5390 ± 0.00579 t = –12.160 15.366 < 0.001 Yes
M2M2 0.9883 ± 0.02287 1.0335 ± 0.01502 t = –6.532 8.104 < 0.001 Yes
MANDL 1.0523 ± 0.01558 1.0858 ± 0.02484 t = –3.223 5.482 0.021 Yes
MLTRL 0.8215 ± 0.01520 0.8552 ± 0.03570 t = –2.287 5.220 0.069 No
MPW 1.1491 ± 0.01713 1.1843 ± 0.02706 t = –3.116 5.491 0.023 Yes
PB 0.9534 ± 0.01252 0.9761 ± 0.00931 t = –5.415 7.368 0.001 Yes
PL 1.1333 ± 0.02461 1.1959 ± 0.01929 t = –7.269 7.117 < 0.001 Yes
ZB 1.1900 ± 0.01936 1.2401 ± 0.00855 t = –11.301 12.568 < 0.001 Yes
BCH 1.0522 ± 0.02209 1.0633 ± 0.02508 t = –1.035 5.968 0.341 No
MTRL 1.0144 ± 0.01665 1.0530 ± 0.02564 t = –3.594 5.518 0.013 Yes

The PCA based on Mosimann size-adjusted variables explained 25.14% of the total variance along PC1 and 21.53% along PC2 (Fig. 3). The plot showed partial displacement of P. septentrionalis from most specimens of P. stenops along PC1, although overlap among taxa indicates that proportional cranial variation is not fully discrete. The two specimens of P. s. boliviensis were positioned toward negative PC1 values, but this pattern should be interpreted cautiously because of the limited sample size. PC1 showed the strongest loadings for BCH and MLTRL, with additional contributions from M2M2, PL, and CC. PC2 showed the strongest loadings for MLTRL, BB, MPW, MTRL, PB, and MANDL (Table SS2).

Figure 3. 

PCA scatter plot based on Mosimann size-adjusted variables calculated from 16 log-transformed craniodental measurements of 58 Phylloderma specimens.

Discussion

Our study analyzed phylogenetic relationships and unresolved diversity in Phylloderma using morphological and genetic data, including complete mitochondrial genomes and newly sequenced outgroup sequences. It has already been demonstrated that under adequate analytical conditions, complete mitogenomes prove to be useful for resolving patterns of phylogenetic relationships within Phyllostomidae (Camacho et al. 2022). In line with this, for studies dealing with degraded material, such as the one presented here, genome skimming is likely a very efficient analysis method.

We recognize that species delimitation in the genomic era, particularly under the standards set by the Bat1K initiative (Teeling et al. 2018) ideally incorporates nuclear data alongside mitochondrial evidence. However, our reliance on complete mitochondrial genomes reflects both practical constraints and methodological strengths. Mitogenome skimming offers substantially greater resolution than single-gene barcoding and has proven effective in delimiting previously unrecognized taxa when nuclear data are unavailable (Dodsworth 2015). Therefore, we frame our taxonomic proposal as a hypothesis supported by congruent mitogenomic divergence and morphological differentiation, while recognizing that broader geographic sampling and nuclear data will be necessary to further test lineage boundaries.

Phylloderma: cleaning up a taxonomic disarray

Our results support the distinctiveness of northern Central American populations historically treated as Phylloderma stenops septentrionalis. This study confirms that this northern lineage is generally larger than P. stenops in both craniomandibular and external measurements, corroborating previous findings (Peters 1865; Goodwin 1940; Bárquez and Ojeda 1979). Welch’s t-tests recovered significant differences in craniomandibular measurements, indicating a marked size component in the morphometric differentiation between the two taxa. After size adjustment using Mosimann variables, the PCA showed partial differentiation of P. septentrionalis from most P. stenops specimens, indicating that proportional cranial differences are present but not fully discrete. Thus, the morphometric evidence is best interpreted as reflecting pronounced overall size differences, accompanied by subtler proportional variation and diagnostic qualitative dental traits.

Two distinct clades were identified, with a complete mitogenome divergence of 8.60% between the Honduran P. septentrionalis and the Panamanian-South American P. stenops. Because this estimate is based on complete mitochondrial genomes, it is not strictly comparable with single-locus distances such as cyt b or COI, but it provides a broader mitochondrial estimate of divergence across multiple genes. The magnitude of this divergence is consistent with values reported among congeneric chiropteran species based on mitochondrial markers, including the 2–11% cyt b range discussed by Bradley and Baker (2001); and is even higher than the divergence reported between Vampyressa villai and its sister species V. thyone (4.66%; Garbino et al. 2024), and comparable to mean mitochondrial divergence found between congeneric species of other phyllostomids: 7% for Sturnira, 9% for Artibeus, 7.5% for Carollia, 5.5% for Chiroderma, 10% for Dermanura, or 7.2% for Platyrrhinus (Bradley and Baker 2001; Velazco and Patterson 2008; Velazco 2013; Molinari et al. 2017).

The Northern Central American P. septentrionalis is generally larger than the Panamanian-South American form, with considerable size differences in GLS and MET III to MET V. Skull size varies, and even though skull shape is similar in both groups, there are notable dental differences (see Taxonomy Section). Phylloderma stenops boliviensis is intermediate in size between the other taxa. Thus, P. septentrionalis is distinguished by its larger size, diagnostic dental traits, and deep complete mitogenome divergence. Although some morphometric traits exhibit overlapping ranges and the size-adjusted PCA does not show complete morphometric separation, consistent trends in trait means, diagnostic cranial characters, and mitogenomic divergence support species-level differentiation. Based on this evidence, we propose revalidating Phylloderma septentrionalis Goodwin, 1940 as a species-level taxon. We acknowledge, however, that this interpretation is constrained by the limited number of specimens available from Central America and by morphological differences that are not equally marked across all characters. Therefore, we treat the revalidation of P. septentrionalis as a well-supported taxonomic hypothesis that should be further tested with additional material, especially from Costa Rica and adjacent regions, and with complementary genetic analyses using nuclear markers.

While multivariate analyses can summarize patterns of morphological variation, we also emphasize classical taxonomic comparison. We acknowledge the disparity in sample sizes among Phylloderma taxa, which can reduce statistical power (Cohen 1988). Nevertheless, the congruence between morphological differentiation and genetic divergence supports species-level distinction under an integrative lineage framework (de Queiroz 2007). This framework is particularly suited for lineages showing limited diagnosability, where morphological diagnosability may be limited but genetic divergence indicates evolutionary independence (Fišer et al. 2018). Consistent with the General Lineage Concept previously outlined (de Queiroz 2007), we interpret the congruent divergence observed across mitogenomic and morphometric datasets as evidence of evolutionary independence in Phylloderma populations.

This taxonomic decision also has direct biogeographic implications. Phylloderma septentrionalis appears to have a distribution restricted to the region between southern Mexico (Oaxaca and Chiapas) and Costa Rica (Carter et al. 1966; Timm et al. 1989; Santos-Moreno and Gallardo 2014). Phylloderma stenops is known to occur from southern Panama to South America. We here amend the distribution proposed by Solari et al. (2019), who suggested the range of P. s. septentrionalis to be from southern Mexico and Central America to northwestern South America (western Colombia, western Ecuador, and northwestern Peru). We also disagree with Martínez-Cerón et al. (2019) who suggested a trans-Andean clade for Phylloderma, distinct from a cis-Andean clade more closely related to specimens from eastern Ecuador and the Guiana Shield. The trans-Andean clade recovered by Martínez-Cerón et al. (2019), composed of samples from Colombia and Panama, appears nested in the larger cis-Andean clade, thus not supporting the existence of a monophyletic trans-Andean clade. Additionally, that study did not include samples from northern Central America, leaving the phylogeographic limits unclear.

Geological and biogeographic considerations

To interpret these patterns, geology provides a context. The tectonic and geological history of Central America is known to have influenced bat distribution and speciation (Hernández-Canchola and León-Paniagua 2017). Geology has shaped the landscape and restricted gene flow, thus has been crucial to species diversification (Marshall 2007). The genetic distinction between the northern Central American and Panamanian-South American Phylloderma is consistent with major geological and topographical discontinuities in Central America, including the Talamanca region and the Hess Escarpment. The latter, which is a steep slope marking the boundary of the Eastern Pacific Rise, has been shown to be important as a barrier separating related species in several taxonomic groups, including bats (Hernández-Canchola and León-Paniagua 2017), insects (Halffter 1987), amphibians (Smith et al. 2007), reptiles (Jadin et al. 2012; Suárez-Atilano et al. 2014), and birds (Navarro et al. 2001; Rocha-Méndez et al. 2019).

At a finer scale, the Talamanca Range’s diverse ecological zones shape bat diversity and distribution. Species compositions in Costa Rica and Panama differ from those in the northern transition zone, including Nicaragua (Ortega and Arita 1998). Gutiérrez-García and Vázquez-Domínguez’s (2013) meta-analysis identified the “Panamanian clade”, a distinct genetic assemblage of species influenced by the formation of the Isthmus of Panama, which disperses towards Costa Rica along the Chorotega block, an important tectonic feature extending from Costa Rica to the Panamanian highlands (Giunta and Oliveri 2009). This highlights the impact of geological events on the evolutionary trajectories of species, with the Hess Escarpment playing a fundamental role both in defining the boundaries of tectonic activity and influencing species distribution.

Our study shows northern Central American (Mexico to Nicaragua) Phylloderma to represent a distinct clade. A critical limitation of this study is the absence of samples from Costa Rica, the region where the Hess Escarpment and the Talamanca Range are most prominent. This gap prevents precise localization of the phylogeographic break and limits our ability to assess which species these populations belong to under our revised taxonomy or even whether they represent an intermediate lineage. Consequently, we treat the role of specific barriers as an informed hypothesis that requires direct sampling across Costa Rica for confirmation.

While our study spans a broad geographic range, we acknowledge that the number of sequenced specimens is modest relative to the spatial scale. However, the use of complete mitochondrial genomes provides high-resolution insights into lineage divergence, and the geographic breadth of our sampling captures key biogeographic transitions. These data allowed us to formulate our species hypothesis based on mitogenomic divergence and spatial structure, but we emphasize that broader sampling and nuclear genomic validation will be essential to confirm species boundaries and assess population-level variation.

Further genetic analysis is needed to clarify the taxonomic status of Costa Rican and Panamanian specimens of Phylloderma. Despite being rare in collections, they are widespread in the Neotropics, thus are ideal for studying geographically structured diversification and hidden lineage boundaries (Stevens 2023). Our findings reveal that not only the northern Central American samples of this genus are distinct, but also that there is an underlying biogeographic element determining their diversification. This pattern is not unique to our studied species but is evident in other bats such as Lophostoma evote (Davis and Carter 1978), Uroderma davisi (Baker and McDaniel 1972; Mantilla-Meluk 2014), Sturnira parvidens (Goldman 1917), Glossophaga leachii (Gray 1844), G. morenoi (Martínez and Villa-Ramírez 1938), and Vampyressa villai (Garbino et al. 2024).

Despite the recent uncovering of previously unrecognized species endemic to the region, owing to the limited number of specimens in scientific collections (Nassar et al. 2020), and to the challenges in obtaining or accessing fresh or adequately preserved tissue samples for genetic analysis, there is likely still an underestimation of the bat biodiversity of Central America (Castellanos 2019). Our findings are consistent with a geographically structured divergence within Phylloderma, and they support a taxonomic reassessment of the genus. Future sampling across Costa Rica and adjacent regions will be necessary to evaluate whether the Talamanca Cordillera, the Hess Escarpment, or other geographic features correspond to the transition between P. septentrionalis and P. stenops.

Taxonomic accounts

To facilitate visualization of diagnostic differences among the Phylloderma taxa treated here, we summarize key qualitative characters and selected external and craniodental measurements in Table 5. Quantitative values are provided as ranges based on examined adult specimens; values for P. s. boliviensis are included for reference (n = 2) but were not used in statistical analyses.

Table 5.

Comparative morphological characters and selected external/craniodental measurements for the taxa treated in this study.

Character or measurement Phylloderma septentrionalis Phylloderma stenops stenops Phylloderma stenops boliviensis
Sample size (morphology) n = 6 n = 50 n = 2 (type series; descriptive only)
Total length (TL) 109.6–130 81–128 140; 140
Forearm length (FA) 65.43–81.64 63.72–77.77 73.2; 73.2
Greatest length of skull (GLS) 34.13–35.3 29.64–33.81 30.95; 31.33
Metacarpal III (MET-III) 73.06–81.6 61.7–73.8 65.34; 66.81
Metacarpal IV (MET-IV) 72.63–80.33 58.73–72.96 64.88; 65.42
Metacarpal V (MET-V) 75.17–83.05 63.28–76.76 66.72; 67.83
Ear shape and internal striations Pointed ears; striations subtle Rounded ears; marked inner striations Ears with rounded tips; faint crenulations on edge.
Ventral pelage pattern Underparts distinctly paler; light coloration extends over shoulders/neck sides Underparts more uniformly colored Dorsal fur reported with a clearer zone at neck level vs uniform in P. s. stenops
Upper inner incisors (I1) Clearly bilobed Smooth or weakly bifid cutting edge Smooth edges, without evident lobulation
Lower incisors Inner lower incisors longer than outer; outer lower incisors smaller, with irregular cutting edges but not evidently bilobed Inner incisors weakly bilobed or with a visible medial notch Inner lower incisors longer than outer; weakly bilobed (as in P. septentrionalis)
Main cusp of lower p4 Non-pointed Pointed Not evaluated beyond limited material
Upper molars: paracone and metacone, stylar shelves Cusps shallower; metastylar and parastylar shelves reduced Cusps taller; metastylar and parastylar shelves well developed Cusps taller; well-developed parastylar shelves protruding from the rest of the molariform cusps in profile view.
Overall cranial robustness and rostrum Skull robust; short rostrum Skull less massive; rostrum slightly longer and flatter Descriptive only (n = 2); intermediate size trend noted
Geographic distribution Southern Mexico (Oaxaca, Chiapas) to Nicaragua Southern Panama (south of Central Cordillera) to South America Southeastern Bolivia

Family Phyllostomidae Gray, 1825

Genus Phylloderma Peters, 1865

Phylloderma septentrionalis Goodwin, 1940

Northern pale-faced bat, murciélago de cara pálida del norte

Phylloderma stenops septentrionalis – Handley (1966: 762)

Examined material.

6 specimens including 6 skins, 6 skulls, 2 complete mitochondrial genomes.

Holotype.

AMNH 126868 (14°18.00’N; 87°50.00’W), an adult female, collected by Cecil F. Underwood (collector number 2033), skin with skull removed (Goodwin 1940), the specimen is housed in the American Museum of Natural History, New York, USA.

Type locality.

“Las Pilas, six miles north of Marcala, about 4000 feet elevation; Department of La Paz, Honduras, March 26, 1937”.

Diagnosis.

Phylloderma septentrionalis is distinguished by its larger size (FA 65.4–82.5 mm; GLS 32.7–35.3 mm), pointed ears with subtle striations, and a high, rounded braincase. It differs from P. stenops by the presence of bilobed upper inner incisors, a non-pointed main cusp on the third lower premolar (p4), and shallower upper molar cusps with reduced metastylar and parastylar shelves. The skull is robust, with a short rostrum and complete, rounded zygomatic arches. Externally, the underparts are distinctly paler and extend over the shoulders and neck sides, contrasting with the darker dorsal fur and wing membranes.

Description.

Phylloderma septentrionalis is a large and robust species. Reported measurements for this species, including the ranges from this study, are: Total length 109.6–137 mm, forearm length 65.4–82.5 mm; and greatest skull length 32.7–35.3 mm (Goodwin 1940, Bárquez and Ojeda 1979; Hall 1981). Externally, it is similar to P. stenops, but larger and differing in cranial characters (Goodwin 1940). The chin has a V-shaped naked cushion, margined by round papillae. The nose leaf is slender. The hair is short. The upperparts are brown with lighter bases; the underparts with the light coloration extending to the shoulders and the sides of the neck; the wing membranes are blackish brown (Goodwin 1940; Hall and Kelson 1959). The ears are large and pointed, with slight undulations on their posterior half; the tragus is long and narrow. The tail is visible from the upper side of the uropatagium.

The upper inner incisors are bilobed; the upper external incisors are small, without evident lobulation, although the cutting edges are not uniform. The lower external incisors have irregular cutting edges but are not evidently bilobed and somewhat smaller than the internal ones. Goodwin (1940) noted that the inner lower incisors are twice as wide as the outer; however, they are not wider, but longer. The anterior face of the upper canine lacks longitudinal grooves. The lower canine has a cingulum on its inner side rising less above the level of the incisors when viewed from the front. The anterior upper premolar (P1) is in contact with canine anteriorly and with the posterior upper premolar (P3) posteriorly but not mounted on it. The second lower premolar (p3) is tiny and is located between the other two premolars. The main cusp of the third lower premolar (p4) lacks a point. The upper molars have shallow metacones and paracones and the metastylar and parastylar shelves are relatively shorter, with a distinct W-shaped pattern. The lower molars have trigonids with sharp and serrated cuspids (Goodwin 1940). The braincase is relatively high and rounded.

The rostrum is shorter than the braincase, with no depression between the orbits. It is also rather wide, giving a robust appearance to the skull. The zygomatic arches are rounded and complete (Goodwin 1940) (Fig. 4).

Figure 4. 

Comparative skull and mandible morphology of Phylloderma septentrionalis (left, AMNH 126869) and P. stenops (right QCAZ 18826) shown in dorsal, ventral, and lateral views of the skull, and lateral view of the mandible. Arrows denote diagnostic dental characters, including the shape of the upper inner incisors and the main cusp of the lower p4. Photos by M. Alejandra Camacho and Rubén D. Jarrín.

Comparisons.

The averages of the craniodental and external measurements analyzed in this study were greater for P. septentrionalis than for P. stenops. In the cases of GLS, MET III, MET IV, and METV, the measurements do not overlap and are always greater in the northern Central American species. The skull differs in size, but not in shape, although there are some differences in the teeth worth noting: the upper inner incisors are bilobed in P. septentrionalis, but with smooth or weakly bifid cutting edges in P. stenops (Bárquez and Ojeda 1979); the main cusp of the lower third premolar (p4) is not pointed in P. septentrionalis, but the contrary in P. stenops; the metacones and paracones are rather shallow, and the metastylar and parastylar shelves are shorter in P. septentrionalis compared to P. stenops. The ears of P. septentrionalis are pointed, with less visible striations, while in P. stenops they are rounded with more marked inner striations (Bárquez and Ojeda 1979) (Fig. 4).

Distribution and habitat.

Phylloderma septentrionalis occurs from southern Mexico (Oaxaca and Chiapas) to Nicaragua, presumably with the Hess Escarpment as the limit of its distribution (Fig. 5). This species is considered rare and inhabits primarily lowland and humid forest, although it has been recorded from a variety of forested and agricultural habitats (Carter et al. 1966; Timm et al. 1989; Santos-Moreno and Gallardo 2014).

Figure 5. 

Geographic distribution of Phylloderma based on examined specimens, mitogenomes, and published records. Circles represent P. septentrionalis and squares represent P. stenops. The inset shows lower Central America and the main montane systems discussed as possible barriers to the observed phylogeographic break: 1) Guanacaste Cordillera, 2) Central Cordillera of Costa Rica, and 3) Talamanca Cordillera. In the absence of Costa Rican specimens, the precise location of the transition between both taxa remains unresolved.

Natural history.

This species consumes fruits, other plant materials, and insects (LaVal 1977; McCarthy 1982; York 2008). York (2008) suggested that it may be an effective seed disperser for some Annonaceae and Cucurbitaceae; however, details on the dietary breadth in the species remain unknown. Little is known about the reproductive cycle; LaVal (1977) reported capturing a pregnant female with a single embryo during the dry season (early February) in Costa Rica; this specimen also carried four males of the bat fly Strebla christinae.

Remarks.

Goodwin (1940) designated AMNH 126868 as the holotype of Phylloderma septentrionalis and mentioned additional paratypes from La Flor Archaga, Honduras, but did not provide catalogue numbers for them. Because paratype status could not be corroborated from the AMNH labels or database records available to us, no additional specimens are treated here as confirmed paratypes. The holotype was not included among the measured specimens; the comparative material from Las Pilas includes AMNH 126867 and AMNH 126869.

Conservation status.

The International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) currently classifies Phylloderma stenops as ‘Least Concern’, but P. septentrionalis has not been assessed separately. However, the Mesoamerican taxon (formerly Phylloderma s. septentrionalis) is listed as “Threatened” within the Conservation Initiatives for the Mammals of Oaxaca, Mexico (Briones-Salas et al. 2016), and is deemed “Critically Endangered” in Nicaragua (Medina-Fitoria 2014; Nassar et al. 2020). In Honduras, it has not been categorized under any risk or threat category (Turcios-Casco et al. 2020). Its conservation status remains unstudied in Guatemala, Belize, and El Salvador. Given its rarity in Central America and its restriction to well-preserved habitats, its vulnerability increases with threats to ecosystems. Recognition of P. septentrionalis at the species level may help prioritize conservation strategies for the species in Central America, particularly by encouraging studies of its distribution, abundance, and vulnerability.

Phylloderma stenops Peters, 1865

Southern pale-faced bat, murciélago de cara pálida del sur

Ph[yllostoma] (Phylloderma) stenops Peters, 1865: 513.

G[uandira] cayanensis Gray, 1866: 114

Phylloderma stenops – Dobson, (1878: 483): recognition of Phylloderma as a genus and invalidation of Guandira cayanensis

Phylloderma septentrionalis (partim) – Goodwin (1940: 1)

Phylloderma stenops – Handley (1966: 762): recognition of Phylloderma stenops septentrionalis

Phyllostomus stenops – Baker et al. (1988: 13)

Phylloderma stenops – Timm et al. (1989: 46): return to the use of Phylloderma

Content.

Two subspecies are recognized: Phylloderma stenops stenops and P. s. boliviensis.

Examined material.

52 specimens including 52 skins, 52 skulls, 13 complete mitochondrial genomes.

Holotype.

Adult, probably male, skin with skull removed (RNH 16843), collector and date of capture unknown. The specimen might be in the Rijksmuseum van Natuurlijke Historie, Leiden, Netherlands (Carter and Dolan 1978).

Type locality.

Cayenne, French Guiana (Peters 1865). Geographic coordinates for the type locality are not available in the original description or other known sources.

Diagnosis.

Phylloderma stenops is characterized by its moderate size within the genus (FA 63.7–81 mm; GLS 29–35.4 mm), rounded ears with marked inner striations, and a flatter facial profile. It differs from P. septentrionalis by the presence of smooth or weakly bilobed upper inner incisors, a pointed main cusp on the third lower premolar (p4), and taller upper molar cusps with more developed metastylar and parastylar shelves. The skull is less massive, with a slightly longer and flatter rostrum. Externally, the underparts are uniformly colored.

Amended description.

Phylloderma stenops can be characterized as a large and robust bat. Reported measurements for this species, including the ranges from this study, are total length 80–128 mm; forearm length 63.7–81 mm; and greatest skull length 29–35.42 mm (Ramírez-Fráncel et al. 2015; Bomfim et al. 2017; Solari et al. 2019). Apart from the general characteristics of its genus, this species is distinguished by a robust skull, and a low (relatively flat) facial profile. The chin is bare, V-shaped, and encircled by a cushion bordered by a row of rounded or elongated papillae (Trujillo and Albuja 2005). The nose leaf is wide at the base and has a pointed tip. The fur is short, with dorsal hair exhibiting a reddish-brown color. The wing membranes attach high on the back, creating a partially nude appearance; the wingtips are whitish. The ears are well separated, moderately large, and rounded; the tragus is long and slender. The calcar is approximately equal to or shorter than the length of the foot, and the tail extends only halfway inside the uropatagium, protruding slightly from the dorsal surface (Husson 1962; Bárquez and Ojeda 1979; Emmons and Feer 1999; Díaz et al. 2011; Martínez-Cerón et al. 2019).

The upper inner incisors are relatively long compared to the external ones, with smooth or weakly bifid cutting edges, and usually converging distally. The upper external incisors are bilobed and slightly less than half the size of the internal ones. Bárquez and Ojeda (1979), referring to Phylloderma stenops boliviensis, pointed out that its upper internal incisors are not bilobed; although it may be a characteristic of the subspecies, or of the two individuals used for the description; this cannot be considered a diagnostic character because there is variability in the sample studied. The lower inner incisors are bilobed, or at least a medial notch is visible which denotes that they are weakly bilobed (Fig. 4). The lower external incisors have cutting edges that are irregular, but are not evidently bilobed, are smaller than the internal ones, and are covered by the cingula of the canines. Bárquez and Ojeda (1979) also pointed out that the four lower incisors are even, probably referring to the fact that they are not bilobed; but again, although it may be a characteristic of the subspecies, or of the two individuals used for the description of P. s. boliviensis, this is not a diagnostic character of the species. The upper canines are subtriangular, the anterior face of the upper canine lacks longitudinal grooves. There is a prominent cingulum on the anterolingual side, in contact with or covering the back of the upper external incisors. The lower canines rise prominently above the level of the incisors when viewed from the front. The anterior upper premolar (P1) is in contact with the canine and with the posterior upper premolar (P3), and the posterior cingulum is mounted on the labial side. P3 is caniform, with its posterior cusp in contact with M1. The anterior lower premolar (p2) rests on the canine. The second premolar (p3) is minuscule and enclosed between the other premolars and is not displaced lingually from the toothrow. The main cusp of the third premolar (p4) is pointed. The upper molars are large, with a tall anterior paracone and a posterior metacone, and with radiating crests with a distinct W-shaped pattern. The metastylar and parastylar shelves are relatively large and give the impression of tall crowns. M3 has a postparacrista only and is V-shaped. The trigonids of the lower molars have a large buccal protoconid flanked anterolingually by the paraconid, and posterolingually by the metaconid. When viewed laterally, the dental arcade of the lower molars is sharp and serrated.

The braincase is relatively high and rounded. The rostrum is shorter than the braincase and has a dorsal profile that is not convex and does not have a depression between the orbits. The zygomatic arches are rounded and complete.

The diploid number is 32, and the fundamental number is 58 (de Souza et al. 2022).

Comparisons.

All craniodental and external measurements average smaller in P. stenops than in P. septentrionalis, with overlapping ranges except for GLS, MET III, MET IV, and MET V. The skull differs in size but not in shape. The upper inner incisors have smooth or weakly bifid cutting edges in P. stenops, as opposed to being clearly bifid in P. septentrionalis. The main cusp of the third lower premolar (p4) is more pointed in P. stenops than in P. septentrionalis. The metacones and paracones are not as deep, and the metastylar and parastylar shelves are relatively shorter in P. septentrionalis than in P. stenops. The ears of P. stenops are rounded with distinct marginal striations on the inner surface, whereas in P. septentrionalis the ears are more pointed with less visible striations (Bárquez and Ojeda 1979) (Fig. 4).

A comparison of the two South American subspecies reveals that P. s. boliviensis is larger than P. s. stenops, although this conclusion is based on the only two specimens reported to date. The lower incisors of P. s. stenops are even and unlobed, whereas in P. s. boliviensis the middle incisors are longer than the outer ones and weakly bilobed (as in P. septentrionalis). The dorsal fur of P. s. stenops is distributed uniformly, whereas in P. s. boliviensis there is a clearer zone at the level of the neck (Bárquez and Ojeda 1979).

Distribution and habitat.

The species is distributed from the south of the Central Cordillera in Panama to South America, including the Guianas, Venezuela, Trinidad and Tobago, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, Bolivia, and Brazil (Fig. 5). The species is considered rare, and primarily inhabits lowland and humid vegetation types, such as evergreen, mesic or riparian forests, inundated floodplain forests, deciduous forests, also extending into drier regions such as dry and xeric shrublands (Williams and Genoways 2008; Carrera et al. 2010; Salas et al. 2014; Ramírez-Fráncel et al. 2015; Bomfim et al. 2017). Salas et al. (2014) recorded the species in a place heavily disrupted by livestock, with small remnants of riparian vegetation.

Natural history.

There is limited knowledge regarding the natural history of the genus Phylloderma. Apparently, P. stenops is omnivorous. Its diet consists primarily of fruits of the families Annonaceae, Cucurbitaceae, Myrtaceae, and Cecropiaceae; and has been documented consuming adult insects, insect larvae, and pupae from an active nest of a social wasp (Jeanne 1970; Giannini and Kalko 2004), as well as lizards in captivity (Pye 1967). The species typically inhabits tropical forests below 1000 m (Carrera et al. 2010) and seems to prefer to forage in natural clearings beneath the dense canopy of pristine lowland forests (Koopman 1976). Phylloderma stenops commonly roosts in caves (Esbérard and Faria 2006). Based on observations in captivity in Brazil, Esbérard (2012) affirmed that P. stenops shows a polyestrous strategy, with seasonal reproduction and presents birth synchrony and postpartum oestrus; also, the gestational period does not exceed 167 days, and sexual maturity is reached around the age of 241–285 days. The bat fly, Strebla christinae, has been reported from this species (Handley 1966).

Remarks.

Peters (1865) originally described the species based on a mounted specimen, without taking measurements, providing only a description of dental numbers and shape, as well as of the form of the skull, noting its similarity to that of Phyllostomus. He mentioned size and shape to be comparable to those of P. hastatus, a species from which it is differentiated by a narrower shoulder girdle (Peters 1865). Handley (1966) observed specimens from Panama to exhibit mixed traits of both nominal species of Phylloderma (P. stenops and P. septentrionalis), yet agreeing more with the former. Consequently, he referred to the Panamanian individuals as P. s. stenops, thus acknowledging subspecific differentiation, and synonymized septentrionalis with stenops.

Conclusions

Accurate taxonomic classification is vital for biogeography, ecology, and conservation, forming the basis for biodiversity protection. Precise species identification helps to understand biodiversity, identify hotspots, and prioritize conservation. In biodiverse regions like Central America, documenting hidden evolutionary diversity is challenging due to complex ecosystems, requiring multidisciplinary approaches to delineate species boundaries with precision. By clearly articulating our species concept and delimitation framework, we aimed to reduce taxonomic ambiguity and provide a reproducible model for future studies in morphologically conserved bat lineages.

Although our sample sizes are limited, the mitogenomic divergence observed across broad geographic regions supports the revalidation of P. septentrionalis. This taxonomic hypothesis should be further tested with expanded sampling, especially from Costa Rica and adjacent regions, and with complementary genetic analyses.

Morphological evidence and complete mitochondrial genomes distinguish the northern Central American lineage P. septentrionalis from Panamanian–South American P. stenops. Accordingly, we revalidate Phylloderma septentrionalis Goodwin, 1940, as a species and provide amended taxonomic treatment for Phylloderma stenops Peters, 1865. The >8% complete mitogenome divergence observed between these lineages is substantial and consistent with values reported among several congeneric phyllostomid species. Such divergence, coupled with morphological trends, supports its recognition as a distinct taxon.

The observed genetic divergence in Phylloderma is consistent with a barrier in the Talamanca region, yet the absence of Costa Rican samples means this scenario remains hypothetical. Targeted sampling in Costa Rica is essential to pinpoint the geographic location of the divergence and determine whether intermediate lineages exist.

We recommend further field studies to collect and preserve specimens in local museums, especially in countries with limited collections like El Salvador. Future research should prioritize sampling across Costa Rica, integrating nuclear markers, additional morphological comparison, and ecological niche modeling to refine species limits and test the role of the Talamanca Cordillera and adjacent geological features as possible barriers. Similar efforts are needed in South America for the subspecies P. s. boliviensis, which remains poorly understood owing to the scarcity of specimens. Our study highlights the complex evolutionary histories of Phylloderma, influenced by historical biogeographical and ecological factors, and underscores the need for comprehensive taxonomic and evolutionary studies to protect biodiversity in Central America.

Acknowledgements

We thank the French Embassy in Ecuador and the Ministry of Europe and Foreign Affairs for supporting the FSPI–Doctoral Schools Project of 2021 and the Agence Nationale de la Recherche; CEBA, ANR-10-LABX-25-01; TULIP, ANR-10-LABX-0041. Special thanks to Marisa Surovy, Darrin Lunde, Nicolás Reyes-Amaya, and Oscar E. Murillo-García for access to natural history collections. We are grateful to Adam Ferguson, Bruce Paterson, Marie L. Campbell, Joseph Cook, Jacqueline Miller, and Burton Lim for providing tissue samples, and Mónica Díaz for morphological data. Thanks to Alexandra Bialonski and Marike Petersen for mtDNA sequencing and assembly. We are also grateful to Patricia Balaresque, Frédéric Delsuc, Alexandre Hassanin, Sergio Solari, and Andrés Merino-Viteri for their comments and suggestions on an early version of this work. Pamela Enríquez provided assistance with organizing sequence data and preparing the GenBank submission tables and Rubén D. Jarrín provided photographic contributions.

References

  • Abascal F, Zardoya R, Telford MJ (2010) TranslatorX: Multiple alignment of nucleotide sequences guided by amino acid translations. Nucleic Acids Research 38: W7–W13. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkq291
  • Al Arab M, Höner zu Siederdissen C, Tout K, Sahyoun AH, Stadler PF, Bernt M (2017) Accurate annotation of protein-coding genes in mitochondrial genomes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 106: 209–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2016.09.024
  • Arteaga M, Piñero D, Eguiarte LE, Gasca J, Medellín RA (2012) Genetic structure and diversity of the nine-banded armadillo in Mexico. Journal of Mammalogy 93: 547–559. https://doi.org/10.1644/11-MAMM-A-211.1
  • Baker RJ, Dunn CG, Nelson K (1988) Allozymic study of the relationships of Phylloderma and four species of Phyllostomus. Occasional Papers Museum of Texas Tech University 125: 1–15.
  • Baker RJ, McDaniel VR (1972) A new subspecies of Uroderma bilobatum (Chiroptera: Phyllostomatidae) from Middle America. Occasional Papers Museum of Texas Tech University 7: 1–4.
  • Bárquez RM, Ojeda RA (1979) Nueva subespecie de Phylloderma stenops (Chiroptera Phyllostomidae). Neotropica 25: 83–89.
  • Bickford D, Lohman DJ, Sodhi NS, Ng PKL, Meier R, Winker K, Ingram KK, Das I (2007) Cryptic species as a window on diversity and conservation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 22: 148–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2006.11.004
  • Bomfim SS, Silvestre SM, Criscuolo AR, Hamsi IC, Ruiz-Esparza JM, da Rocha PA, Ferrari SF (2017) Phylloderma stenops Peters, 1865 (Chiroptera, Phyllostomidae): First record for the state of Sergipe, Brazil. Oecologia Australis 21: 213–218. https://doi.org/10.4257/oeco.2017.2102.13
  • Briggs JC (1994) The genesis of Central America: Biology versus geophysics. Global Ecology and Biogeography Letters 4: 169–172. https://doi.org/10.2307/2997648
  • Briones-Salas M, Lavariega MC, Cortés-Marcial M, Monroy-Gamboa AG, Masés-García CA (2016) Iniciativas de conservación para los mamíferos de Oaxaca, México. In: Briones-Salas M, Hortelano-Moncada Y, Magaña-Cota G, Sánchez-Rojas G, Sosa-Escalante JE (Eds) Riqueza y Conservación de los Mamíferos en México a Nivel Estatal (Vol. 1). Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México, 329–366.
  • Camacho MA, Cadar D, Horváth B, Merino-Viteri A, Murienne J (2022) Revised phylogeny from complete mitochondrial genomes of phyllostomid bats resolves subfamilial classification. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 196: 1591–1607. https://doi.org/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlac055
  • Camacho MA, Menéndez-Guerrero PA, Horváth B, Cadar D, Murienne J (2024) A polytypic species revisited: Phylogenetic and morphological variation, taxonomic status, and geographical distribution of Trachops (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae). Journal of Mammalogy 105: 1001–1021. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmammal/gyae067
  • Carrera JP, Solari S, Larsen PA, Alvarado DF, Brown AD, Carrion BC, Tello JS, Baker RJ (2010) Bats of the tropical lowlands of western Ecuador. Special Publications Museum of Texas Tech University 57: 1–36.
  • Carter DC, Dolan PG (1978) Catalogue of type specimens of Neotropical bats in selected European museums. Special Publications Museum of Texas Tech University 15: 1–136.
  • Castellanos AA (2019) Using Museums and Mammals to Unravel Central American Biodiversity and Biogeography. PhD Thesis, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, 167 pp.
  • Cohen J (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd Edition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New York, NY, 567 pp.
  • Crawford AJ, Bermingham E, Carolina PS (2007) The role of tropical dry forest as a long-term barrier to dispersal: A comparative phylogeographical analysis of dry forest tolerant and intolerant frogs. Molecular Ecology 16: 4789–4807. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294x.2007.03524.x
  • Davis WB, Carter DC (1978) A review of the round-eared bats of the Tonatia silvicola complex, with descriptions of three new taxa. Occasional Papers Museum of Texas Tech University 53: 1–12.
  • de Souza JK, de Sousa RF, da Silva JM, de Cassia Faria K (2022) Citogenética e morfometria com morcegos dos gêneros Phyllostomus e Phylloderma. Brazilian Journal of Development 8: 55392–55411. https://doi.org/10.34117/bjdv8n8-046
  • Díaz M, Aguirre LF, Bárquez RM (2011) Clave de identificación de los murciélagos del cono sur de Sudamérica. ETREUS, Cochabamba, 94 pp.
  • Emmons LH, Feer F (1999) Mamíferos de los bosques húmedos de América tropical. Editorial FAN Santa Cruz de La Sierra, Santa Cruz, 307 pp.
  • Esbérard CEL (2012) Reproduction of Phylloderma stenops in captivity (Chiroptera, Phyllostomidae). Brazilian Journal of Biology 72: 171–174.
  • Fišer C, Robinson CT, Malard F (2018) Cryptic species as a window into the paradigm shift of the species concept. Molecular Ecology 27: 613–635. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.14486
  • Fouquet A, Vences M, Salducci MD, Meyer A, Marty C, Blanc M, Gilles A (2007) Revealing cryptic diversity using molecular phylogenetics and phylogeography in frogs of the Scinax ruber and Rhinella margaritifera species groups. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 43: 567–582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2006.12.006
  • Garbino GS, Hernández-Canchola G, León-Paniagua L, Tavares V (2024) A new Mexican endemic species of yellow-eared bat in the genus Vampyressa (Phyllostomidae, Stenodermatinae). Journal of Mammalogy 105: 563–576. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmammal/gyae001
  • Giunta G, Oliveri E (2009) Some remarks on the Caribbean Plate kinematics: Facts and remaining problems. Special Publications Geological Society of London 328: 57–75.
  • Goldman EA (1917) New mammals from North and Middle America. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington 30: 107–116.
  • Goodwin GG (1940) Three new bats from Honduras and the first record of Enchisthenes harti (Thomas) for North America. American Museum Novitates 1075: 1–4.
  • Gray JE (1844) Mammalia. In: Hinds RB (Ed.) Zoology of the Voyage of H.M.S. Sulphur, under the Command of Captain Sir Edward Belcher, R.N., C.B., F.R.G.S., etc. during the Years 1836–42. Vol. I. Smith, Elder and Co., London, 7–36.
  • Gutiérrez-García TA, Vázquez-Domínguez E (2013) Consensus between genes and stones in the biogeographic and evolutionary history of Central America. Quaternary Research 79: 311–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yqres.2012.12.007
  • Hall E (1981) The Mammals of North America. Wiley, New York, NY, 1600 pp.
  • Hall E, Kelson K (1959) The Mammals of North America. Vol. 2. Ronald Press, New York, NY, 1162 pp.
  • Handley CO Jr (1966) Checklist of the Mammals of Panama. In: Wenzel R, Tipton VJ (Eds) Ectoparasites of Panama. Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, IL, 753–796.
  • Hernández-Canchola G, León-Paniagua L (2017) Genetic and ecological processes promoting early diversification in the lowland Mesoamerican bat Sturnira parvidens (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 114: 334–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2017.06.015
  • Husson AM (1962) The bats of Suriname. Zoologische Verhandelingen 58: 1–278.
  • IBM Corp. (2011) IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows (Version 20.0). IBM, Armonk, NY.
  • Jadin RC, Townsend JH, Castoe TA, Campbell JA (2012) Cryptic diversity in disjunct populations of Middle American montane pitvipers: A systematic reassessment of Cerrophidion godmani. Zoologica Scripta 41: 455–470. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-6409.2012.00547.x
  • Jeanne RL (1970) Note on a bat (Phylloderma stenops) preying upon the brood of a social wasp. Journal of Mammalogy 51: 624–625. https://doi.org/10.2307/1378408
  • Koopman KE (1976) Biology of bats of the New World family Phyllostomatidae. Part I. Zoogeography. Special Publications Museum of Texas Tech University 10: 39–47.
  • Kozlov AM, Darriba D, Flouri T, Morel B, Stamatakis A (2019) RAxML-NG: A fast, scalable and user-friendly tool for maximum likelihood phylogenetic inference. Bioinformatics 35: 4453–4455. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btz305
  • Kunz TH, Wemmer C, Hayssen V (1996) Sex, age, and reproductive condition of mammals. In: Wilson DE, Cole FR, Nichols JD, Rudran R, Foster MS (Eds) Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity. Standard Methods for Mammals. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, 279–290.
  • LaVal RK (1977) Notes on some Costa Rican bats. Brenesia 10/11: 77–83.
  • Lemoine F, Domelevo JB, Wilkinson E, Correia D, Dávila FM, de Oliveira T, Gascuel O (2018) Renewing Felsenstein’s phylogenetic bootstrap in the era of big data. Nature 556: 452–456. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0043-0
  • Li D, Luo R, Liu CM, Leung CM, Ting HF, Sadakane K, Yamashita H, Lam TW (2016) MEGAHIT v1.0: A fast and scalable metagenome assembler driven by advanced methodologies and community practices. Methods 102: 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2016.02.020
  • López-Cuamatzi IL, Ortega J, Ospina-Garcés SM, Zúñiga G, MacSwiney GM (2024) Molecular and morphological data suggest a new species of big-eared bat (Vespertilionidae: Corynorhinus) endemic to northeastern Mexico. PloS One 19: e0296275. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0296275
  • Mantilla-Meluk H (2014) Defining species and species boundaries in Uroderma (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae) with a description of a new species. Occasional Papers Museum of Texas Tech University 325: 1–32.
  • Marshall JS (2007) The geomorphology and physiographic provinces. In: Bundschuh J, Alvarado G (Eds) Central America: Geology, Resources and Hazards. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 75–122 pp.
  • Martínez L, Villa-Ramirez B (1938) Contribuciones al conocimiento de los murciélagos de México. Anales del Instituto de Biología de la UNAM 9: 339–360.
  • Martínez-Cerón JM, Patiño-Castillo E, Carvalho-Madrigal S, Díaz-Nieto JF (2019) Molecular and morphological identification of Phylloderma stenops Peters, 1865 (Chiroptera, Phyllostomidae) and new records for Colombia. Check List 15: 37–44. https://doi.org/10.15560/15.1.37
  • Medellín RA, Urbano-Vidales G, Sánchez-Herrera O, Tellez-Giron SG, Arita WH (1986) Notas sobre murciélagos del este de Chiapas. Southwestern Naturalist 31: 532–535. https://doi.org/10.2307/3671710
  • Medina-Fitoria A (2014) Murciélagos de Nicaragua, guía de campo. Programa para la Conservación de los Murciélagos de Nicaragua (PCMN) y Ministerio del Ambiente y los Recursos Naturales (MARENA). Complejo Gráfico TMC, Managua, 282 pp.
  • Medina-Fitoria A, Saldaña O, Martínez JG, Aguirre Y, Silva W, Chávez M, Pérez J (2015) Nuevos reportes sobre los murciélagos (Mammalia: Chiroptera) de Nicaragua, América Central, con la adición de siete nuevos registros de especies. Mastozoologia Neotropical 22: 43–54.
  • Miller GS (1907) The families and genera of bats. Bulletin of the United States National Museum 57: 1–282.
  • Mittermeier RA, Turner WR, Larsen FW, Brooks TM, Gascon C (2011) Global biodiversity conservation: The critical role of hotspots. In: Zachos FE, Habel JC (Eds) Biodiversity Hotspots: Distribution and Protection of Conservation Priority Areas. Springer, Berlin and Heidelberg, 3–22.
  • Molinari J (2023) A bare-bones scheme to choose between the species, subspecies, and ‘evolutionarily significant unit’ categories in taxonomy and conservation. Journal of Nature Conservation 72: 126335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2023.126335
  • Molinari J, Gutiérrez EE, Lim BK (2023) Systematics and biogeography of Anoura cultrata (Mammalia, Chiroptera, Phyllostomidae): A morphometric, niche modeling, and genetic perspective, with a taxonomic reappraisal of the genus. Zootaxa 5297: 151–188. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5297.2.1
  • Molinari J, Bustos XE, Burneo SF, Camacho MA, Moreno SA, Fermín G (2017) A new polytypic species of yellow-shouldered bats, genus Sturnira (Mammalia: Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae), from the Andean and coastal mountain systems of Venezuela and Colombia. Zootaxa 4243: 75–96. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4243.1.3
  • Moratelli R, Wilson DE, Novaes RL, Helgen KM, Gutiérrez EE (2017) Caribbean Myotis (Chiroptera, Vespertilionidae), with description of a new species from Trinidad and Tobago. Journal of Mammalogy 98: 994–1008. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmammal/gyx062
  • Mulcahy DG, Morrill BH, Mendelson JR III (2006) Historical biogeography of lowland species of toads (Bufo) across the trans-Mexican neovolcanic belt and the Isthmus of Tehuantepec. Journal of Biogeography 33: 1889–1904. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01546.x
  • Nassar JM, Aguirre LF, Rodríguez-Herrera B, Medellín RA (2020) Threats, status, and conservation perspectives for leaf-nosed bats. In: Fleming TH, Dávalos LM, Mello M (Eds) Phyllostomid Bats: A Unique Mammalian Radiation. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 435–456.
  • Novaes RLM, Cláudio VC, Carrión-Bonilla C, Abreu EF, Wilson DE, Maldonado JE, Weksler M (2021) Variation in the Myotis keaysi complex (Chiroptera, Vespertilionidae), with description of a new species from Ecuador. Journal of Mammalogy 103: 540–559. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmammal/gyab139
  • Ortega J, Arita HT (1998) Neotropical-nearctic limits in middle America as determined by distributions of bats. Journal of Mammalogy 79: 772–783. https://doi.org/10.2307/1383088
  • Peters W (1865) Über die zu den Vampyri gehörigen Flederthiere und über die natürliche Stellung der Gattung Antrozous. Monatsberichte der Königlich Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin 1865: 503–524.
  • Prjibelski A, Antipov D, Meleshko D, Lapidus A, Korobeynikov A (2020) Using SPAdes de novo assembler. Current Protocols in Bioinformatics 70: e102. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpbi.102
  • Pye JD (1967) Bats. In: Lane-Petter W, Worden AN, Hill BF, Vevers G, Paterson JS (Eds) The UFAW Handbook on the Care and Management of Laboratory Animals. E&S Livingstone, London, 491–501.
  • R Core Team (2026) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. https://www.R-project.org
  • Ramírez-Fráncel LA, García-Herrera LV, Reinoso G (2015) Nuevo registro del murciélago pálido Phylloderma stenops (Phyllostomidae) en el valle alto del Río Magdalena, Colombia. Mastozoología Neotropical 22: 97–102.
  • Rocha-Méndez A, Sánchez-González LA, González C, Navarro-Sigüenza AG (2019) The geography of evolutionary divergence in the highly endemic avifauna from the Sierra Madre del Sur, Mexico. BMC Evolutionary Biology 19: 237–258. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-019-1564-3
  • Salas JA, Burneo SF, Fabián VH, Carvajal MR (2014) First record of the pale-faced bat Phylloderma stenops Peters 1865 (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae) in the province of Guayas, Southwest Ecuador. Check List 10: 1218–1222. https://doi.org/10.15560/10.5.1218
  • Sánchez-Palomino P, Rivas-Pava P, Cadena A (1993) Composición, abundancia y riqueza de especies de la comunidad de murciélagos en bosques de galería en la Serranía de la Macarena (Meta-Colombia). Caldasia 17: 301–312. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23641303
  • Santos-Moreno A, Gallardo L (2014) Three new bat species in the state of Oaxaca, Mexico. Chiroptera Neotropical 20: 1226–1229.
  • Smith SA, Nieto A, Reeder TW, Wiens JJ (2007) A phylogenetic perspective on elevational species richness patterns in Middle American treefrogs: Why so few species in lowland tropical rainforests? International Journal of Organic Evolution 61: 1188–1207. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00085.x
  • Solari S, Medellín RA, Rodríguez-Herrera B, Dumont ER, Burneo SF (2019) Family Phyllostomidae. In: Wilson DE, Mittermeier RA (Eds) Handbook of the Mammals of the World, Vol. 9, Bats. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona, 444–583.
  • Stevens RD (2023) Wither the subspecies? An ecological perspective on taxonomic, environmental and sexual determinants of phenotypic variation in big-eared woolly bats, Chrotopterus auritus. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 139: 203–213. https://doi.org/10.1093/biolinnean/blad006
  • Straub SC, Parks M, Weitemier K, Fishbein M, Cronn RC, Liston A (2012) Navigating the tip of the genomic iceberg: Next-generation sequencing for plant systematics. American Journal of Botany 99: 349–364. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1100335
  • Suárez-Atilano M, Burbrink F, Vázquez-Domínguez E (2014) Phylogeographical structure within Boa constrictor imperator across the lowlands and mountains of Central America and Mexico. Journal of Biogeography 41: 2371–2384. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.12372
  • Tavares V, Gardner AL, Ramírez-Chaves HE, Velazco PM (2014) Systematics of Vampyressa melissa Thomas, 1926 (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae), with descriptions of two new species of Vampyressa. American Museum Novitates 3813: 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1206/3813.1
  • Teeling EC, Vernes SC, Dávalos LM, Ray DA, Gilbert MTP, Myers E, Bat1K Consortium (2018) Bat biology, genomes, and the Bat1K Project: To generate chromosome-level genomes for all living bat species. Annual Review Animal Biosciences 6: 23–46. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-animal-022516-022811
  • Timm RM, Wilson DE, Clauson BL, LaVal RK, Vaughan CS (1989) Mammals of the La Selva–Braulio Carrillo complex, Costa Rica. North American Fauna 75: 1–162. https://doi.org/10.3996/nafa.75.0001
  • Trujillo FG, Albuja LH (2005) Nuevos registros de Phylloderma stenops (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae) y Lasiurus borealis (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae) para el Ecuador. Politécnica 26: 45–53.
  • Turcios-Casco MA, Medina-Fitoria A, Portillo-Álvarez LR (2020) First record of the pale-face bat (Phylloderma stenops, Phyllostomidae) in the Caribbean lowlands of Gracias a Dios in eastern Honduras. Caribbean Journal of Science 50: 16–22. https://doi.org/10.18475/cjos.v50i1.a3
  • Velazco PM, Patterson BD (2008) Phylogenetics and biogeography of the broad-nosed bats, genus Platyrrhinus (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 49: 749–759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2008.09.015
  • Verde RS, Oliveira SF, Meneses A, Gonçalves F, Alencar L, Silva TM, Morato EF (2021) Bats (Mammalia, Chiroptera) from a bamboo-dominated forest in the southwestern Brazilian Amazon, with the first records of Glyphonycteris sylvestris Thomas, 1896 and Phylloderma stenops Peters, 1865 from Acre state. Check List 17: 311–321. https://doi.org/10.15560/17.2.311
  • Wang Z, Liang JL, Huang LN, Mengoni A, Shu WS (2021) Metagenomic assembly: Reconstructing genomes from metagenomes. In: Mengoni A, Bacci G, Fondi M (Eds) Bacterial Pangenomics. Methods in Molecular Biology. Humana Press, New York, NY, 139–152.
  • Williams SL, Genoways HH (2008) Subfamily Phyllostominae Gray, 1825. In: Gardner AL (Ed.) Mammals of South America, Volume 1, Marsupials, Xenarthrans, Shrews, and Bats. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 255–299.

Appendix

Materials examined

Phylloderma stenops (measured)

BOLIVIA – El Beni • 1 ♀ Rio Mattos, Beni Reserve; 14°38.31’S, 66°17.06’W; 190 m; 14 Sep 1987; USNM-564304. – Santa Cruz • 2 ♀ Near Santa Rosa; 17°2.84’S; 63°35.92’W; 250 m; 12 Jul 1975; FML-383/413.

BRAZIL – Amazonas • 2 ♂ Manaus; 3°1.83’S, 59°57.60’W; 80 m; 14 Jan 1980; USNM-530954/530955. – Pará • 1 ♀ Belem, Utinga; 1°26.68’S, 48°30.08’W; 0 m; 20 Aug 1965; USNM-361532.

COLOMBIA – Arauca • 1 ♀ Vereda Caribabare; 6°16.62’N, 71°46.04’W; 285 m; 31 Mar 2015; IAvH-M-10080. – Casanare • 1 ♂ Vereda Piedecuesta; 5°36.00’N, 72°13.00’W; 360 m; 18 May 2001; IAvH-M-7113. – Chocó • 1 ♂ La Italia, Valencia; 4°57.06›N, 76°17.24’W; 925 m; 30 Jul 1985; UV-4516. – Meta • 1 ♀ Cabaña Duda; 2°10.80’N, 73°46.99’W; 235 m; 25 Dec 1975; IAvH-M-2217. – Vichada • 1 ♀ PNN El Tuparro; 5°18.57’N, 67°53.69’W; 85 m; 21 Apr 1981; IAvH-M-3125.

ECUADOR – El Oro • 1 ♀ Bosque Petrificado de Puyango; 3°52.77’S, 80°5.57’W; 325 m; 22 Jul 2004; QCAZ-9190. – Esmeraldas • 1 ♀ San Lorenzo; 1°16.56’N, 78°49.93’W; 16 m; 12 Aug 2004; QCAZ-9641. • 1 ♀ San Lorenzo, Estación La Chiquita; 1°14.00’N, 78°45.60’W; 60 m; 12 Aug 2004; QCAZ-9189. – Guayas • 1 ♀ El Retiro; 1°18.70’S, 79°56.56’W; 40 m; 6 Oct 2010; QCAZ-12651. – Los Rios • 1 ♀ Rio Palenque Science Center; 0°35.18’S, 79°21.88’W; 155 m; 12 Feb 1979; USNM-528488. – Morona Santiago • 1 ♂ San Isidro, Domono Alto; 2°7.04’S, 78°8.61’W; 1700 m; 21 Feb 2009; MEPN-11154. – Orellana • 1 ♂ Boanamo, sendero Mono Araña; 1°14.83’S, 76°22.50’W; 225 m; 20 Sep 2012; QCAZ-13589. • 1 ♂ PN Yasuní; 0°42.02’S, 76°28.00’W; 255 m; 21 Jun 2000; MEPN-9438. • 1 ♂ Shiripuno, Ñoneno; 1°1.14’S, 76°54.93’W; 265 m; 15 Nov 2019; QCAZ-18826. – Pichincha • 1 ND Nanegal; 0°7.00’N, 78°46.00’W; 1680 m; 3 Feb 2001; MEPN-9571. – Sucumbíos • 1 ♂ Destacamento Patria; 0°27.90’S, 75°20.71’W; 185 m; 4 May 2004; QCAZ-7168. • 1 ♀ Puente del Río Cuyabeno; 0°1.89’S, 76°19.27’W; 240 m; 24 Jan 2004; QCAZ-6881. – Zamora Chinchipe • 1 ♀ Alto Machinaza, Cordillera del Cóndor; 3°46.28’S, 78°27.39’W; 1760 m; 1 Jun 2009; MEPN-11180.

FRENCH GUIANA – Cayenne • 1 ♀, 1 ♂ Paracou; 5°17.00’N, 52°55.00’W; 40 m; 31 Aug 1993/4 Nov 1994; AMNH-267441/267891.

GUYANA – Barima-Waini • 1 ♀ Baramita; 7°22.28’N, 60°29.75’W; 142 m; 30 Jan 1999; USNM-582289. – Upper Demerara-Berbice • 1 ♂ Dubulay Ranch; 5°40.20’N, 57°51.86’W; 40 m; 5 Feb 1999; USNM-582288.

PANAMA – Canal Zone • 1 ♂ Barro Colorado Island, Lutz Creek; 9°9.40’N, 79°50.78’W; 160 m; 10 Mar 1976; USNM-519694. – Colon • 1 ♂ Bohio Peninsula, Nicole Cove; 9°11.87’N, 79°50.26’W; 120 m; 24 Apr 1985; USNM-457937. – San Blas • 3 ♂ Armila, Quebrada Venado; 8°39.63’N, 77°27.11’W; 10 m; 27 Feb – 28 Mar 1963; USNM-335142–335144. – Veraguas • 1 ♂ Nuri; 7°58.75’N, 81°2.55’W; 25 m; 19 Mar 1993; USNM-575469.

PERU – Loreto • 1 ♂ Nuevo San Juan, Galvez River; 5°15.00’S, 73°10.00’W; 120 m; 15 Jun 1998; AMNH-13231.

VENEZUELA – Amazonas • 1 ♀ Capibara, Brazo Casiquiare; 2°37.20’N, 66°19.20’W; 110 m; 6 Jun 1967; USNM-407584. • 1 ♀ Esmeralda, Rio Cunucunuma; 3°39.00’N, 65°46.20’W; 140 m; 4 Jan 1967; USNM-388843. • 1 ♂, 1 ♀ Rio Mavaca, Esmeralda; 2°15.00’N, 65°16.80’W; 195 m; 3 Apr 1967; USNM-388847/388848. • 2 ♂, 1 ♀ San Juan, Rio Manapiare; 5°7.80’N, 66°16.20’W; 135 m; 13-19 Jul 1967; USNM-407585/407586/407588. • 1 ♀ Tamatama, Rio Orinoco; 3°10.20’N, 65°49.20’W; 135 m; 12 May 1967; USNM-407583. – Apure • 1 ♂ Hato Cariben, Rio Cinaruco; 6°33.00’N, 67°13.20’W; 76 m; 16 Dec 1965; USNM-373527. – Bolívar • 1 ♂, 1 ♀ Hato San Jose, La Paragua; 6°49.20’N, 63°28.80’W; 300 m; 6/8 Apr 1967; USNM-388840/-388841. – Falcón • 1 ♀ Boca De Yaracuy, Pto. Cabello; 10°34.80’N, 68°15.00’W; 0 m; 23 Sep 1965; USNM-371548. • 1 ♀ La Pastora; 11°12.00’N, 68°37.20’W; 70 m; 30 Nov 1967; USNM-419108. – Sucre • 1 ♀ Cumana; 10°27.00’N, 63°57.00’W; 0 m; 13 Dec 1966; USNM-388839.

Phylloderma stenops (sequenced)

GUYANA – Demerara-Mahaica • 1 ♀ Ceiba Biological Station; 6°29.94’N, 58°13.12’W; 20 m; 28 Nov 2000; ROM-112628. – Potaro-Siparuni • 1 ♂ Iwokrama Reserve; 4°39.64’N, 58°40.84’W; 65 m; 7 Jul 1995; ROM-104693. • 1 ♀ Kabukalli Landing, Iwokrama Forest; 4°17.00’N, 58°31.00’W; 100 m; 11 Oct 1999; ROM-111529. – Barima-Waini • 1 ♂ Waikerebi; 7°31.00’N, 59°23.00’W; 18 m; 12 Apr 1991; ROM-98903.

PANAMA – Canal Zone • 1 ♀ Parque Nacional Soberanía; 9°4.46’N, 79°39.59’W; 75 m; 24 Feb 1995; ROM-104225.

PERU – Madre de Dios • 1 ♂ Madre de Dios, Manu; 12°40.10’S, 71°16.14’W; 425 m; 21 Jun 1905; FMNH-170089. – Piura • 1 ♀ Palo Negro; 5°26.10’S, 79°48.17’W; 345 m; 9 Oct 2012; ROM-125158.

SURINAME – Sipaliwini • 1 ♀ Bakhuis; 4°44.44’N, 56°48.10’W; 265 m; 1 Feb 2006; ROM-117511. • 1 ♀ Iconja Landing, Sipaliwini River; 1°59.67’N, 56°5.53’W; 290 m; 30 Jul 2009; ROM-120383. • 1 ♂ Merian Site 3; 5°6.21’N, 54°30.99’W; 90 m; 23 Nov 2011; ROM-121025.

Phylloderma stenops (both measured and sequenced)

ECUADOR – Orellana • 1 ♀ PN Yasuní; 1°0.47’S, 76°11.18’W; 240 m; 7 Mar 2019; QCAZ-18527.

TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO – Trinidad • 1 ♀ Arima; 10°38.25’N, 61°16.93’W; 60 m; 18 May 1963; AMNH-205371.

Phylloderma septentrionalis (measured)

BELIZE – Toledo • 1 ♀ Columbia Forest Station; 16°17.73’N, 88°55.23’W; 45 m; 12 Dec 1969; USNM-506468.

HONDURAS –– La Paz • 1 ♀ Las Pilas; 14°18.00’N, 87°50.00’W; 1165 m; 23 Mar 1937; AMNH-126869. – Francisco Morazán • 1 ♂ Tegucigalpa, La Flor Archaga; 14°5.55’N, 87°12.04’W; 1050 m; 15 Oct 1935; AMNH-124835.

MEXICO – Chiapas • 1 ♂ San Antonio Nuevo Paraíso; 17°9.60’N, 94°21.18’W; 260 m; 21 Feb 2012; ECOAN-MAM S/N.

Phylloderma septentrionalis (both measured and sequenced)

HONDURAS – La Paz • 1 ♀ Las Pilas; 14°18.00’N, 87°50.00’W; 1165 m; 26 Mar 1937; AMNH-126867. – Francisco Morazán • 1 ♀ Tegucigalpa, La Flor Archaga; 14°5.55’N, 87°12.04’W; 1050 m; 15 Oct 1935; AMNH-124834.

Chrotopterus auritus (sequenced)

ECUADOR – Loja • 1 ♂ Jorupe; 4°22.11’S, 79°53.97’W; 680 m; 21 Mar 2018; QCAZ-17594.

Gardnerycteris crenulata (sequenced)

ECUADOR – Orellana • 1 ♀ PN Yasuní; 0°59.79’S, 76°12.21’W; 230 m; 16 Mar 2019; QCAZ-18512.

Vampyrum spectrum (sequenced)

ECUADOR – Orellana • 1 ♀ PN Yasuní; 1°3.80’S, 76°12.77’W; 270 m; 24 Nov 2018; QCAZ-18135.

Tonatia bakeri (sequenced)

ECUADOR – Pichincha • 1 ♂ Reserva Mashpi; 0°10.02’N, 78°53.28’W; 875 m; 27 Sep 2019; QCAZ-18699.

Macrophyllum macrophyllum (sequenced)

ECUADOR – Sucumbíos • 1 ♀ RPF Cuyabeno. Cabañas Neotropic; 0°0.58’S, 76°10.90’W; 225 m; 12 Dec 2015; QCAZ-15869.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 

Table SS1, S2

Camacho MA, Burneo SF, Cadar D, Horváth B, Tóth GE, Murienne J (2026)

Data type: .zip

Explanation notes: Table SS1. Voucher specimens used for morphological and molecular analyses across all datasets. The table lists all specimens examined in this study, including museum catalog numbers, species identification, country and locality information, and whether each specimen was measured, included in morphological analyses, sequenced, or yielded as valid sequences. All literature references correspond to previously published records when applicable [.xlsx file]. — File S2. Loadings, eigenvalues, and percentage of variance for the principal components from a PCA of the 16 linear measurements for adult specimens of Phylloderma [.pdf file].

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Download file (333.55 kb)
login to comment