Research Article
Print
Research Article
Sky Islands of Mozambique harbour cryptic species of chameleons: Description of four new species of sylvan chameleons (Squamata: Chamaeleonidae: Nadzikambia Tilbury, Tolley & Branch, 2006)
expand article infoKrystal Tolley, Werner Conradie§|
‡ South African National Biodiversity Institute Kirstenbosch Research Centre, Cape Town, South Africa
§ Port Elizabeth Museum (Bayworld), Port Elizabeth, South Africa
| Nelson Mandela University, George, South Africa
Open Access

Abstract

Several populations of forest-living chameleons in the genus Nadzikambia have been recorded from the montane sky island forests in northern Mozambique. These populations have not been evaluated for their species status, despite the potential for these allopatric populations having diverged at the species level due to vicariance of forest since the mid-Miocene. With only two described species of Nadzikambia, we hypothesised that candidate (new) species occur on each of four additional montane sky islands surveyed. We applied an integrative taxonomic approach to evaluate this, using morphological and genetic data collected from each population. Their distributions were mapped, the morphological dataset was quantitatively analysed using a multivariate analysis, and one nuclear and three mitochondrial genes were sequenced to generate a phylogeny and allele networks. Independent species delimitation analyses were applied to the genetic dataset (mPTP, SpeciesIdentifier, p distances) as supporting evidence for candidate species. By applying integrative taxonomy under the General Lineage Species Concept, we find support for four new species of Nadzikambia. The montane forests where they occur have declined in extent due to slash and burn agriculture and these forest endemics are presumed to be in a proportional decline as their habitat contracts. By examining historical and present-day satellite imagery, we show that all Nadzikambia species have lost significant proportions of their range. Given they do not occur outside these forests, these species are in imminent danger of extinction.

Keywords

Africa, Chamaeleonidae, conservation priority, Critically Endangered, habitat loss, morphological conservatism, reptiles, species declines, species delimitation, taxonomy

Introduction

It is widely recognised that montane systems harbour rich assemblages of endemic species, as mountains often have physical and environmental features that differ from neighbouring lowlands setting them apart from the surrounding landscape matrix. Where mountains are markedly isolated (e.g., inselbergs), vicariance of montane populations leads to opportunities for allopatric speciation (Fjeldså and Lovett 1997; Liu et al. 2024), particularly for species that are not vagile and when immigration between mountains is unlikely. This effect can be especially striking for some inselbergs that contain populations that have been isolated for millennia or eons. The effect is, in many ways similar to that island archipelagos – once connected but subsequently isolated for extended periods allowing allopatric speciation to occur (Vanschoenwinkel et al. 2024). This similarity has resulted in inselbergs sometimes being referred to as ‘sky islands’.

In Africa, montane systems are well-known for promoting diversification and speciation (Tolley and Menegon 2013; Branch et al. 2014; Couvreur et al. 2021). Indeed, some of these montane systems have been long renowned for their richness and endemism, such as the Eastern Arc and Albertine Rift mountains (Burgess et al. 1998; Brooks et al. 2004; Burgess et al. 2007; Plumptre et al. 2007; Rovero et al. 2014), Cameroon highlands (Brooks et al. 2004; Herrmann et al. 2005; Gonwouo et al. 2007), and the mountainous Cape Floristic region (Cowling et al. 1996; Brooks et al. 2004; Cowling et al. 2009; Samways et al. 2024). Newly recognised as an area of elevated richness and endemicity across multiple taxonomic groups is the South East Africa Montane Archipelago (SEAMA) located in Malawi and Mozambique (Bayliss et al. 2024). The unique biodiversity within this montane system has been highlighted only recently due to the advent of dedicated biological surveys during the last few decades (e.g., van Noort et al. 2007; Bayliss et al. 2014; Conradie et al. 2016; Bittencourt-Silva et al. 2020; Farooq et al. 2022), that were previously impossible to carry out due to a protracted civil war in Mozambique (1977–1992) followed by periods of unrest.

The list of reptiles and amphibians associated to SEAMA sky islands has been growing because of these recent biodiversity surveys (Bayliss et al. 2024). In keeping with this trend, several populations of chameleons from two genera (Nadzikambia Tilbury, Tolley & Branch, 2006 and Rhampholeon Günther, 1893) have been newly discovered on each of the inselbergs surveyed (Timberlake et al. 2007; Bayliss 2008; Bayliss et al. 2010, 2014; Conradie et al. 2016; Bittencourt-Silva et al. 2020), some of which have been described as new species (Branch and Tolley 2010; Branch et al. 2014). Records of Nadzikambia are scarce given these chameleons tend to be situated extremely high in the canopy making them difficult to locate. Indeed, for many years, the genus was thought to be monotypic with only N. mlanjensis (Broadley, 1965) described from Mount Mulanje, Malawi (Broadley 1965). It took 45 years for the next species in the genus to be described, N. baylissi Branch & Tolley, 2010 from Mount Mabu, Mozambique (Branch and Tolley 2010). Dedicated surveys have now produced verified records from each new mountain surveyed, with discoveries of populations on Mounts Chiperone, Inago, Namuli and Ribáuè (Conradie et al. 2016). However, these populations are of uncertain identification, and an assessment of their taxonomy is urgently needed. Given that forest chameleons tend to be highly specialised and not inclined to long-distance dispersal across unsuitable habitat (e.g., Tolley et al. 2011), we expected that allopatric speciation through vicariance has resulted in these sky islands each having an endemic species of Nadzikambia (Fig. 1).

Figure 1. 

Localities for the sky islands where Nadzikambia chameleons were sampled, superimposed over digital elevation layer, with the six species of Nadzikambia, including the newly described species.

To assess species boundaries in Nadzikambia, we take an integrative taxonomic approach (Padial et al. 2010), which recognises that species properties encompass a variety of features (e.g., ecological, life history, behavioural, evolutionary history, morphological/phenotypic). Divergence among species for their properties is not instantaneous but is gradual, and trait divergence can be achieved at different time points along an evolutionary continuum. We follow an integrative taxonomic pipeline (Padial et al. 2010) that allows for overlap (grey areas) in the trait divergence continuum (Roux et al. 2016), under the General Lineage Species Concept (GLSC: de Queiroz 2005, 2007). Informed by phylogeny (see Wüster 2025), we collated evidence and use this integrative framework to assess allopatric Nadzikambia populations.

Our investigation centred around phylogenetically informed species delimitation approaches using three mitochondrial and one nuclear gene. We generated a fully sampled phylogeny including the described species and new populations from each of the sky islands surveyed. Using the constructed phylogeny, we assessed species delimitation using a likelihood approach, supported by distance-based analyses to identify candidate species, and an evaluation of nuclear/mitochondrial discordance (see Padial et al. 2010; Wüster 2025). The phylogenetic analyses were used as support for candidate species that were further assessed by a quantitative morphological analysis and examination of specimens for diagnostic features. We estimated the timing of vicariance that has likely led to speciation in allopatry, given their life history and strong philopatry to forest habitats. Finally, we provide an overview of the conservation, threats and extinction risk of all species of Nadzikambia through mapping of forest loss over time. The uncontrolled forest loss in the region has already led to the decline of forest endemics (e.g., Tolley et al. 2022a; Bayliss et al. 2024) despite each of these mountains being designated as a Key Biodiversity Area (WCS 2021). Therefore, it is essential to describe and catalogue the forest biodiversity of SEAMA sky island forests before these species are lost.

Materials and Methods

Phylogenetic Dataset

Samples for genetic analyses were collected between 2014–2018 from inselbergs in Mozambique, namely Mounts Chiperone, Inago, Namuli and Ribáuè (Fig. 1). DNA samples were collected from liver of vouchered specimens or as tail tips of additional individuals that were released, stored in 99% ethanol or Nucleic Acid Preservation (NAP) buffer and were deposited at the National Wildlife Biobank, Pretoria, South Africa. The ingroup consisted of 31 individuals including 18 new samples from Mounts Chiperone, Inago, Namuli and Ribáuè (Table 1), multiple representatives of the two described species (new sequences supplemented with additional sequences downloaded from GenBank), plus an outgroup consisting of two individuals from the genus Bradypo­dion (downloaded from GenBank).

Table 1.

Individuals included in the phylogenetic analyses of Nadzikambia, with field identification number, museum voucher number, locality information and GenBank accession numbers for each gene. GenBank accessions for newly generated sequences are prefixed by “PX”. In cases where samples have matching vouchers, the museum codes are provided: PEM – Port Elizabeth Museum; NHMUK – Natural History Museum, London. Mt – Mount, NA – no specimen or no data.

Genus Species Field ID Voucher Locality 16S ND2 ND4 RAG-1
Described species
Nadzikambia baylissi HB062 PEM R10854 Mt. Mabu HM582314 HM582317 PX977668 HM582320
Nadzikambia baylissi HB063 PEM R10855 Mt. Mabu HM582315 HM582318 PX977669 HM582321
Nadzikambia baylissi HB064 PEM R10856 Mt. Mabu HM582316 HM582319 PX977670 HM582322
Nadzikambia baylissi MOZ14-115 NA Mt. Mabu PX857944 PX926936 PX977671 PX977696
Nadzikambia baylissi MOZ14-116 PEM R21128 Mt. Mabu PX857945 PX926937 PX977672 PX977697
Nadzikambia baylissi MOZ14-117 PEM R21129 Mt. Mabu PX857946 PX926938 PX977673 PX977698
Nadzikambia baylissi MOZ14-118 PEM R21130 Mt. Mabu PX857947 PX926939 PX977674 PX977699
Nadzikambia baylissi MOZ14-119 PEM R21131 Mt. Mabu PX857948 PX926940 PX977675 PX977700
Nadzikambia mlanjensis CT54 NA Mt. Mulanje AY289859 AY289917 PX977676 NA
Nadzikambia mlanjensis CT55 PEM R05746 Mt. Mulanje AY289860 AY289918 PX977677 DQ996681
Nadzikambia mlanjensis PEM R16294 PEM R16294 Mt. Mulanje DQ923841 EF014325 HF570595 DQ996679
Nadzikambia mlanjensis PEM R16315 PEM R16315 Mt. Mulanje DQ923842 EF014326 NA DQ996680
Nadzikambia mlanjensis QQ0822 PEM R18447 Mt. Mulanje, Mimosa Forest PX857949 PX926941 PX977678 PX977701
New species
Nadzikambia franklinae sp. nov. MOZ14-254 PEM R21164 Mt. Namuli, Satellite Camp PX857950 PX926942 PX977679 PX977702
Nadzikambia franklinae sp. nov. MOZ14-257 PEM R21167 Mt. Namuli, Satellite Camp PX857951 PX926943 PX977680 PX977703
Nadzikambia franklinae sp. nov. MOZ14-262 PEM R21188 Mt. Namuli, Ukalini Forest PX857952 PX926944 PX977681 PX977704
Nadzikambia franklinae sp. nov. MOZ14-272 PEM R21190 Mt. Namuli, Ukalini Forest PX857953 PX926945 PX977682 PX977705
Nadzikambia evanescens sp. nov. MOZ17-183 PEM R24260 Mt. Inago PX857954 PX926946 PX977683 PX977706
Nadzikambia evanescens sp. nov. MOZ17-368 PEM R24373 Mt. Inago PX857955 PX926947 PX977684 PX977707
Nadzikambia evanescens sp. nov. MOZ17-465 PEM R24362 Mt. Inago PX857956 PX926948 NA PX977708
Nadzikambia evanescens sp. nov. MOZ17-466 NHMUK 2025.3275 Mt. Inago PX857957 PX926949 PX977685 PX977709
Nadzikambia evanescens sp. nov. MOZ17-473 PEM R24376 Mt. Inago PX857958 PX926950 PX977686 PX977710
Nadzikambia goodallae sp. nov. MOZ17-128 PEM R24253 Mt. Ribáuè PX857959 PX926951 PX977687 PX977711
Nadzikambia goodallae sp. nov. MOZ17-295 NHMUK 2025.3273 Mt. Ribáuè PX857960 PX926952 PX977688 PX977712
Nadzikambia goodallae sp. nov. MOZ17-296 PEM R24395 Mt. Ribáuè PX857961 PX926953 PX977689 PX977713
Nadzikambia goodallae sp. nov. MOZ17-297 NHMUK 2025.3274 Mt. Ribáuè PX857962 PX926954 PX977690 PX977714
Nadzikambia nubila sp. nov. MOZ17-026 PEM R24245 Mt. Chiperone PX857963 PX926955 PX977691 PX977703
Nadzikambia nubila sp. nov. MOZ17-062 NHMUK 2025.3277 Mt. Chiperone PX857964 PX926956 PX977692 PX977704
Nadzikambia nubila sp. nov. MOZ17-063 PEM R24249 Mt. Chiperone PX857965 PX926957 PX977693 PX977715
Nadzikambia nubila sp. nov. MOZ17-064 NHMUK 2025.3278 Mt. Chiperone PX857966 PX926958 PX977694 PX977716
Nadzikambia nubila sp. nov. MOZ17-069 PEM R24250 Mt. Chiperone PX857967 PX926959 PX977695 NA
Outgroup
Bradypodion damaranum KTH118 NA Knysna Forest AY756647 AY756697 HF570524 HF570724
Bradypodion caeruleogula KTH676 PEM R17505 Ngoye forest EU877674 EU877688 HF570522 HF570722

For all new samples, total genomic DNA was extracted using a salt extraction protocol (Aljanabi and Martinez 1997). PCR amplification of three mitochondrial and one nuclear gene was carried under standard conditions, varying the concentrations of reagents and the reaction cycling according to the quality of the samples using the following primer pairs: 16S (primers 16Sa/16Sb, Palumbi 1996), ND2 (primers L4349 or L4437b/H5934: Macey et al. 1997a, 1997b), ND4 (F3/R4: Forstner et al. 1995) and nuclear RAG-1 (F118 or G396(R13)/ R1067 or G397(R18): Groth and Barrowclough 1999; Matthee et al. 2004). Sanger sequencing was carried out at Macrogen (Amsterdam, Netherlands) using the same forward primers used in PCRs for mitochondrial fragments and for both forward and reverse primers for nuclear loci. Sequences were edited and aligned using Geneious v11.1.5 (https://www.geneious.com).

Phylogenetic analyses and species delimitation

For the phylogenetic analyses, the dataset was partitioned by gene. A maximum likelihood (ML) analysis was run using the command line RAxML v8 (Stamatakis 2014), applying the GTR + I + G model for all partitions and 1000 bootstrap replicates. Bayesian inference was run using MrBayes 3.2.6 (Huelsenbeck and Ronquist 2001) using the Cyberinfrastructure for Phylogenetic Research (CIPRES) Science Gateway v3.3 (Miller et al. 2010). jModelTest 2.1.6 (Guindon and Gascuel 2003; Darriba et al. 2012) was used to assess the evolutionary model that best fitted the data, and this was incorporated into the MrBayes analysis (nst = 6 + I + G). The Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) was run for 20 million generations with four chains and a burn-in of 10%. Tracer v1.7 (Rambaut et al. 2018) was used to verify that the effective sample size (ESS) was above 200 for all parameters.

Hypotheses for species boundaries were generated through multiple approaches. Firstly, a distance-based ‘barcoding’ approach was used, whereby pairwise sequence divergences were estimated and used to generate frequency distributions of intra- and interspecific sequence divergence using SpeciesIdentifier v1.8 (Meier et al. 2006), for the ND2 dataset given this gene had the most comprehensive coverage. In this approach, intraspecific and interspecific divergence values should not overlap (e.g., the “barcode gap”), given genetic divergences are expected to be low within species, but high between species. As a comparison, sequence divergences between described species were estimated using uncorrected net p distances using MEGA-X v10.1.8 (Kumar et al. 2018). These pairwise sequence divergences were estimated separately for all genes. Species delimitation was also examined using mPTP maximum likelihood MCMC (multi rate Poisson tree processes method) webservice (https://mcmc-mptp.h-its.org; Kapli et al. 2017) inputting the best scoring ML tree and cropping the outgroup. The null model was used as the starting point, running 100,000 generations, sampling every 1000 generations and burn-in set at 1000.

For the nuclear gene, sharing of alleles and reticulation among populations was explored in Hapsolutely v0.2.3, a module in the iTaxoTools project (Vences et al. 2021), using the median-joining method (Bandelt and Forster 1999). For network construction, the nuclear gene sequences were phased to produce two alleles per individual using the PHASE (Stephens et al. 2001) module in iTaxoTools. Given some sequences had multiple sites with (clear) ambiguities, reconstruction parameters were relaxed with the phasing (-p) and allele (-q) thresholds set to 0.5 certainty. We trialled using higher certainty values for reconstruction, but this approach retained ambiguities. The use of relaxed phasing parameters will result in lower confidence in the final network generated and may underestimate allele diversity. However, retaining the ambiguities would generate an inaccurate network.

Morphology

For the morphological comparison, we examined 46 specimens of Nadzikambia. This included topotypic specimens of N. mlanjensis, the type material of N. baylissi, and newly collected specimens from various inselbergs across Mozambique. Detailed information on the additional examined specimens, including collection localities, voucher numbers, and associated data, is provided in Appendix 1. This comprehensive approach ensured robust comparative analysis by incorporating both historically significant material and recent collections from geographically diverse regions. All specimens examined are housed in the herpetological collections of the Port Elizabeth Museum (Bayworld), Port Elizabeth, South Africa (PEM) and the Natural History Museum of London, United Kingdom (NHMUK).

The following measurements were recorded from museum specimens using a digital calliper with an accuracy of 0.01 mm: snout–vent length (SVL – from tip of snout to anterior edge of vent); tail length (TL – from tip of tail to posterior edge of vent); head length (HL – from superior tip of casque to tip of snout); head width (HW – measured at widest point just posterior to eyes); head height (HH – from rictus (i.e., commissure of jaw) to superior tip of casque); mouth length (ML – from tip of rostral to rictus); casque-eye length (CE – measured diagonally from posterior margin of orbit to superior tip of casque); snout length (SL – from tip of snout to anterior margin of orbit); eye diameter (ED – measured horizontally at centre of eye); cranial crest gap (CC – measured between the raised supraorbital crests at mid-eye); inter-limb length (ILL – from axillary to inguinal attachments of limbs); forelimb length (FLL – from elbow to wrist); hind limb length (HLL – from knee to heel). All specimens measured on right unless damaged and this was noted.

Additionally, the following scalation details were recorded using a Nikon SMZ1270 dissecting microscope: the number of upper labials (UL) and lower labials (LL); lateral crest (LC – nature of scales demarcating lateral edge of casque); parietal crest (PC – enlarged tubercles forming the parietal crest along the longitudinal midline of the casque top); supraorbital ridge (SR – size and shape of scales forming the ridge above each eye); the mid-lateral body scalation characteristics, including scale shape (flattened or tubercular) and their arrangement (separated by granules or abutting); and the nature of scales on the crown between the supraorbital and cranial crests (tuberculate or flattened). For the purposes of this study, we distinguish between the ‘crown’, defined as the dorsal surface of the head, and the ‘casque’, defined as the posteriorly elevated region of the head. This allows our work to be comparable to Branch and Tolley (2010).

For the hemipenial description and comparison we follow the terminology provided by Klaver and Böhme (1986) and Branch and Tolley (2010).

To examine if there were significant morphological differences among taxa, the measurements were used in a multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA). It should be noted that the collections contained too few males to analyse quantitatively (1–3 individuals from each mountain; no males from Chiperone). Due to the likelihood of sexual dimorphism in chameleons (e.g., da Silva and Tolley 2013; Barends and Tolley 2024) the sexes were not combined into a single analysis and only females were analysed. Linear regressions were run for each trait using SVL as the covariate and the unstandardized residuals were retained, resulting in size-free variables. The residuals were input into a MANOVA using species/mountain as the fixed factor and applying Tukey’s HSD post hoc test. This approach was used as it allows for post hoc comparisons among species/mountain, which cannot be carried out using a multivariate analysis of covariance (MANCOVA). Nevertheless, to ensure the results were robust, a MANCOVA was run using SVL as the covariate and marginal means were estimated, but without any post hoc comparisons. For both tests, Pillai’s Trace statistic was used to evaluate significance given this approach is the most robust to violations of MANOVA and MANCOVA. These analyses were run in SPSS v30.0.

Mapping

Each of the Afromontane forest patches were mapped using a combination of the currently available Google Earth and Esri ArcGIS satellite imagery by bounding the visible Afrotemperate forest edges with polygons. In some cases, there were multiple forest patches on a mountain, and in others, a single forest patch. The total area of the forest patches was taken as the distribution size of the species for that mountain. Two estimates of extinction risk used in IUCN Red Listing (IUCN Standards and Petitions Committee 2022) were then generated: 1) Extent of Occurrence (EOO) was estimated by a convex hull drawn around the forest delineated polygon, 2) Area of Occupancy (AOO) was estimated by the total number of 2x2 km grid cells that the forest patch(es) cover. Using the same protocol, the Google Earth or Esri ArcGIS historical satellite imagery was used to evaluate the extent of forest and estimate range size/EOO/AOO in the past. The earliest available images that had sufficient resolution to identify forest were used, and this varied depending on the mountain. No historical imagery prior to 2000 was used. Further to this, a historical account by Vincent (1933) from Mount Namuli included descriptive text and a hand-drawn map that described forest location and extent. In addition, Dowsett-Lemaire and Dowsett (1988) and Dowsett-Lemaire (1988) collated historical information to describe the extent of forest at Mount Mulanje. In both cases, we used this available information to roughly delineate the original forest extent.

Results

Phylogenetics

Both maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian analyses recovered the same topology, although some nodes that were not supported in the ML analysis were fully supported by the Bayesian analysis (Fig. 2). The topology was consistent with previous analyses that included described species of Nadzikambia (Branch and Tolley 2010; Tolley et al. 2013) and the newly sampled sky island populations each formed separate monophyletic clades.

Figure 2. 

Maximum likelihood consensus tree for Nadzikambia with bootstrap values (above branches) and Bayesian posterior probabilities (below branches). Support values not shown for intraspecific nodes or for nodes with <0.95 pp/70% bootstrap. Red outlines show the supported species clusterings inferred with the mPTP analysis. Inset: Frequency distributions of pairwise sequence divergence values for the ND2 gene. Interspecific distances are shown by the black bars, and intraspecific distances are shown by grey bars.

Species boundaries were supported for each of the clades corresponding with described species and each of the sky island populations. The barcoding gap analysis showed that the sequence divergence between each of the sky island populations falls within the distribution of inter-specific values (Fig. 2). In addition, p distances between these clades for each of the genes (Table 2) is on par with sequence divergence values between other species of chameleons (e.g., Tolley et al. 2006; Branch and Tolley 2010; Tolley et al. 2011; Branch et al. 2014; Hughes et al. 2017; Hughes et al. 2018; Tolley et al. 2022b). Notably however, the range of values among the pairwise comparisons vary considerably. For example, comparisons for Mounts Namuli and Inago are extremely high compared to the other sky islands (e.g., 11–13% for ND2 and ND4), whereas comparisons between N. baylissi (Mount Mabu), N. mlanjensis (Mount Mulanje), Mount Chiperone, and Mount Ribáuè are approximately 1.7–6.2%. This is reflected in the distribution of pairwise sequence divergences (Fig. 2) where there are two peaks for the inter-specific values. Nevertheless, the lowest pairwise inter-specific values show a clear threshold defining the lower range of intra-specific values. The maximum likelihood species delimitation analysis (mPTP) supported each of the clades from the sky island populations as separate species, denoted by supported clusterings (Figs 2, S1).

Table 2.

Pairwise uncorrected net p distances among species or clades of Nadzikambia for four genes a) 16S, b) ND2, c) ND4, d) RAG-1. Inter-specific values are in the lower matrix and intra-specific are on the diagonal.

a) 16S Mountain N. baylissi N. mlanjensis N. nubila sp. nov. N. franklinae sp. nov. N. evanescens sp. nov. N. goodallae sp. nov.
N. baylissi Mabu 0.0000
N. mlanjensis Mulanje 0.0189 0.0009
N. nubila sp. nov. Chiperone 0.0070 0.0201 0.0000
N. franklinae sp. nov. Namuli 0.0394 0.0419 0.0421 0.0000
N. evanescens sp. nov. Inago 0.0441 0.0467 0.0467 0.0044 0.0000
N. goodallae sp. nov. Ribáuè 0.0093 0.0228 0.0113 0.0446 0.0492 0.0000
b) ND2 Mountain N. baylissi N. mlanjensis N. nubila sp. nov. N. franklinae sp. nov. N. evanescens sp. nov. N. goodallae sp. nov.
N. baylissi Mabu 0.0029
N. mlanjensis Mulanje 0.0415 0.0063
N. nubila sp. nov. Chiperone 0.0172 0.0470 0.0011
N. franklinae sp. nov. Namuli 0.1158 0.1208 0.1203 0.0026
N. evanescens sp. nov. Inago 0.1246 0.1259 0.1273 0.0322 0.0018
N. goodallae sp. nov. Ribáuè 0.0379 0.0551 0.0398 0.1228 0.1334 0.0017
c) ND4 Mountain N. baylissi N. mlanjensis N. nubila sp. nov. N. franklinae sp. nov. N. evanescens sp. nov. N. goodallae sp. nov.
N. baylissi Mabu 0.0005
N. mlanjensis Mulanje 0.0476 0.0048
N. nubila sp. nov. Chiperone 0.0168 0.0466 0.0015
N. franklinae sp. nov. Namuli 0.1184 0.1278 0.1166 0.0006
N. evanescens sp. nov. Inago 0.1173 0.1243 0.1146 0.0416 0.0006
N. goodallae sp. nov. Ribáuè 0.0444 0.0622 0.0435 0.1316 0.1258 0.0026
d) RAG-1 Mountain N. baylissi N. mlanjensis N. nubila sp. nov. N. franklinae sp. nov. N. evanescens sp. nov. N. goodallae sp. nov.
N. baylissi Mabu 0.0011
N. mlanjensis Mulanje 0.0019 0.0014
N. nubila sp. nov. Chiperone 0.0003 0.0016 0.0000
N. franklinae sp. nov. Namuli 0.0026 0.0052 0.0020 0.0007
N. evanescens sp. nov. Inago 0.0011 0.0032 0.0007 0.0000 0.0032
N. goodallae sp. nov. Ribáuè 0.0000 0.0021 0.0002 0.0027 0.0006 0.0007

The nuclear gene network (Fig. 3) showed no allele sharing among populations from Mounts Mulanje (N. mlanjensis) and Namuli. There was one common allele shared among populations from all other mountains, but this finding is likely to have been inflated due to the relaxed phasing for some alleles. There were also two additional alleles that occurred in high frequency that were shared among Mounts Mabu (N. baylissi) and Ribáuè, and Mounts Chiperone and Ribáuè. Each population also had a number of unique alleles.

Figure 3. 

Network of nuclear (RAG-1) alleles for Nadzikambia based on phased sequences. Alleles are colour coded according to the proportion of individuals per species having that allele. The sizes of the circles represent the frequency of that allele in the dataset (scaling of circles to left). All branches represent one mutation.

Morphology

Similar to some other chameleon genera (e.g., Branch et al. 2014), the external morphology of Nadzikambia is highly conservative. From the meristic and scalation data (Table 3), there are no individual traits that are diagnostic among all populations. Branch and Tolley (2010) documented minor differences between N. mlanjensis and N. baylissi for the shape and conditions of scales on the crown, number of labial scales, body scalation, and hemipenial structure. However, with a larger series of specimens afforded in this study, it appears that these characters exhibit much greater within species variation than previously thought and cannot be used as diagnostic among species (Table 3).

Table 3.

Comparative measurements (mm) and scale counts for the six species of Nadzikambia. See Methods for descriptions of measurements.

N. mlanjensis N. baylissi N. franklinae sp. nov. N. goodallae sp. nov. N. evanescens sp. nov. N. nubila sp. nov.
Mount Mulanje Mount Mabu Mount Namuli Mount Ribáuè Mount Inago Mount Chiperone
N = 11 (4 M; 7 F) N = 8 (3 M; 5 F) N = 7 (1 M; 6 F) N = 5 (1 M; 4 F) N = 7 (1 M; 6 F) N = 5 (5 F)
SVL 46.4–81.7 (69.5±10.3) 61.1–74.2 (67.0±4.4) 70.3–79.3 (74.4±3.3) 50.8–76.4 (69.7±9.7) 54.1–78.8 (69.1±9.5) 59.6–64.7 (62.0±2.3)
TL 51–9–95.6 (73.8±15.2) 65.3–94.4 (79.6±8.2) 75.1–88.1 (80.8±5.2) 58.8–99.6 (81.7±13.5) 57.5–97.8 (80.1±12.7) 71.2–78.0 (73.9±3.1)
ToL 98.3–168.6 (140.6±26.7) 127.7–168.6 (146.5±12.0) 148.1–163.7 (155.8±5.5) 109.6–175.2 (152.4±22.4) 111.6–175.9 (149.2±21.8) 132.0–142.7 (135.9±4.2)
TL/SVL 1.0–1.3 (1.1±0.1) 1.0–1.3 (1.2±0.1) 1.0–1.3 (1.1±0.1) 1.1–1.3 (1.2±0.1) 1.1–1.3 (1.2±0.1) 1.1–1.3 (1.2±0.1)
HL 15.6–26.8 (21.9±3.2) 19.1–24.6 (21.5±2.1) 20.9–23.8 (22.8±1.0) 16.8–24.6 (21.7±2.6) 12.1–26.2 (20.6±4.5) 18.1–19.4 (18.6±0.6)
HW 7.6–13.0 (10.8±1.6) 8.5–11.4 (10.0±1.1) 10.3–11.5 (10.8±0.4) 8.2–11.9 (10.3±1.2) 8.0–12.4 (10.6±1.5) 7.8–8.8 (8.5±0.4)
HH 9.7–16.8 (13.6±2.2) 11.4–15.5 (13.3±1.6) 12.7–14.8 (13.8±0.7) 11.1–15.1 (13.2±1.3) 10.6–16.3 (13.2±1.7) 11.1–12.7 (11.6±0.7)
ML 9.3–15.8 (13.1±1.8) 11.9–15.0 (13.0±1.1) 13.9–14.6 (14.3±0.2) 10.6–15.5 (13.6±1.7) 11.0–15.6 (13.7±1.5) 10.7–11.9 (11.1±0.5)
CE 6.9–12.8 (10.0±1.7) 8.2–11.7 (9.7±1.3) 9.2–11.1 (10.3±0.6) 7.5–11.0 (9.5±1.2) 8.0–12.4 (9.7±1.4) 7.2–8.2 (7.8±0.4)
SL 4.7–8.5 (6.8±1.0) 5.8–7.4 (6.7±0.6) 6.7–8.1 (7.4±0.4) 5.8–7.8 (6.9±0.6) 5.4–7.9 (6.9±0.8) 5.7–6.2 (5.9±0.2)
ED 5.2–8.0 (6.9±0.9) 6.1–7.4 (6.8±0.4) 6.0–7.5 (6.8±0.5) 5.5–8.2 (7.4±1.1) 5.9–7.9 (6.9±0.7) 5.7–6.5 (6.1±0.4)
CC 4.1–7.4 (6.1±1.0) 4.9–6.3 (5.4 ±N 0.5) 6.1–7.1 (6.6±0.4) 4.5–5.6 (5.2±0.4) 5.0–6.8 (6.0±0.6) 4.4–5.3 (4.8±0.3)
IL 27.2–49.7 (40.9±6.8) 32.4–41.1 (38.0±2.7) 39.8–48.5 (43.3±3.1) 27.5–45.0 (39.1 v6.3) 30.0–47.4 (42.1±5.9) 34.9–41.9 (38.1±2.6)
FLL 7.2–15.6 (12.8±2.4) 10.6–13.4 (12.4±1.0) 12.2–13.8 (13.1±0.5) 9.5–14.0 (12.7±1.6) 10.2–14.6 (13.1±1.5) 11.1–13.0 (12.0±0.7)
HLL 8.0–15.1 (12.2±2.1) 10.7–12.6 (11.7±0.7) 11.2–13.1 (12.3±0.7) 8.5–13.3 (11.8±1.7) 9.9–14.1 (12.3±1.4) 10.6–12.3 (11.2±0.7)
Scale counts
UL 13–17 (15.2±1.1) 16–19 (17.3±0.7) 13–17 (15.5±1.2) 13–17 (16.6±1.2) 15–19 (16.3±1.3) 16–17 (16.6±0.5)
LL 16–18 (17.0±0.7) 16–20 (17.7±1.1) 15–18 (16.4±1.0) 17–20 (18.1±1.8) 15–19 (17.4±0.8) 16–20 (17.4±1.4)
Lat. Cr. 9–12 (10.4±1.0) 8–13 (10.4±1.2) 9–12 (10.4±1.0) 10–12 (11.2±0.6) 9–12 (10.8±1.0) 9–12 (10.0±1.3)
S. Orb. Cr. 12–15 (13.6±1.0) 13–15 (14.5±0.7) 10–14 (12.5±1.1) 14–16 (15.6±1.2) 12–16 (13.6±1.3) 12–16 (14.4±1.4)
M – males; F – females; Lat. Cr.–Lateral crest; S. Orb. Cr.–Supraorbital crest

While there are no individual traits that are diagnostic, there is consistency in some traits for some species comparisons. Regarding labial scale counts, N. mlanjensis and the Mount Namuli population have the lowest number of upper labials (UL), whereas N. baylissi has the highest. Conversely, the Mount Namuli population has the lowest number of lower labials (LL), while Mount Ribáuè exhibits the highest count. Other populations, however, have overlapping UL and LL numbers. The number of elevated scales on the lateral crest is consistent across most species, except for Mount Ribáuè, which has the highest count, a pattern also observed in the number of supraorbital crest scales. Head shape also varies among males (Fig. 4); specimens from Mount Inago and Mount Namuli have an elevated and rounded casque, while N. mlanjensis and Mount Ribáuè specimens possess a flatter, laterally extending casque. Nadzikambia baylissi displays an intermediate shape. We acknowledge that casque morphology may be influenced by multiple biological factors, including age, overall health and nutritional condition, and sex. Ontogenetic stage may affect the degree of cranial development, while variation in physiological condition can influence the expression of para-parietal bulging. Additionally, sex-specific, hormone-mediated growth—particularly in males—may contribute to differences in casque size and elevation associated with dominance or display functions. Larger sample size over different time periods are needed to validate if the observed differences are genuine or due to biological factors. Additionally, posterior and lateral crown scales are smooth in Mount Inago, Mount Namuli, and N. baylissi, whereas other populations exhibit a more rugose texture.

Figure 4. 

Differences in head shape of male Nadzikambia. A N. mlanjensis (Mt. Mulanje, PEM R18445), B N. goodallae sp. nov. (Mt. Ribáuè, PEM R24394), C N. baylissi (Mt. Mabu, PEM R21128), D N. franklinae sp. nov. (Mt. Namuli, PEM R21165), E N. evanescens sp. nov. (Mt. Inago, PEM R24372).

Examination of the hemipenial structure among all the populations, excluding Mount Chiperone where we collected only females, no major differences could be observed (Fig. 5). This is in contrast to the results of Branch and Tolley (2010), in which differences between N. mlanjensis and N. baylissi were indicated. However, while the hemipenis (only right one everted) of N. baylissi holotype (PEM R18055) is correctly illustrated and described, when taking into account the addition of two males (PEM R21128 and PEM R21131) examined in this study from the type locality, with both hemipenis everted (n = 4), it indicates that the previously noted differences do not constitute interspecific diagnostic characters separating N. baylissi and N. mlanjensis. The lack of differences of hemipenial structure among populations suggests that this is not particularly useful for species delineation and that previous differences observed was influenced by age, sexual maturity or breeding condition of males examined. Indeed, the ‘subconical bulges’ that were recorded as only present in N. baylissi (Branch and Tolley 2010) is actually present in N. mlanjensis as illustrated in their Figure 3A (specimen re-examined for this study) as well as all other males examined in present study. This structure is not mentioned or illustrated in Klaver and Böhme (1986) but seems to be referable to what they call ‘pair of elongated papillae’. The other minor difference to Klaver and Böhme (1986) is that the central surface of the apex is in line with the two papillated lobes and exhibits a prominent medial mucosal ‘hump’.

Figure 5. 

Hemipenes comparison of the sulcal surface of A Nadzikambia mlanjensis (PEM R18144), B N. baylissi (PEM R21128), C N. evanescens sp. nov. (PEM R24372), D N. goodallae sp. nov. (PEM R24394), E N. franklinae sp. nov. (PEM R21165), F lateral view of E.

The quantitative assessment of morphological traits using the MANOVA on size corrected residuals showed no significant differences among taxa (MANOVA Pillai’s Trace = 0.83, p = 0.066). This result was similar for the MANCOVA (Pillai’s Trace = 2.44, p = 0.162). However, examination of univariate tests suggested some variables were significantly different among some taxa (Table 4), but these were comparatively few in scope and cannot be relied upon as diagnostic due to small sample sizes.

Table 4.

Post hoc comparisons from the multivariate analysis of variance for morphological traits in Nadzikambia females. Species are grouped according to homogeneous subsets based on the post hoc Tukey HSD test. Estimated marginal means (EMM) for the four traits (TL, ML, CE, CC) that showed significant differences among species/mountains are ordered by increasing values. Traits with no significant pairwise differences are not tabulated.

TL (mm) EMM ML (mm) EMM CE (mm) EMM CC (mm) EMM
N. mlanjensis (Mount Mulanje) 70.15 N. nubila sp. nov. (Mount Chiperone) 11.6 N. nubila sp. nov. (Mount Chiperone) 8.16 N. goodallae sp. nov. (Mount Ribáuè) 5.02
N. franklinae sp. nov. (Mount Namuli) 70.48 70.48 N. mlanjensis (Mount Mulanje) 12.25 12.25 N. goodallae sp. nov. (Mount Ribáuè) 8.81 8.81 N. nubila sp. nov. (Mount Chiperone) 5.17 5.17
N. goodallae sp. nov. (Mount Ribáuè) 74.51 74.51 N. goodallae sp. nov. (Mount Ribáuè) 12.72 12.72 N. mlanjensis (Mount Mulanje) 9.01 9.01 N. baylissi (Mount Mabu) 5.34 5.34
N. evanescens sp. nov. (Mount Inago) 76.29 76.29 N. baylissi (Mount Mabu) 12.63 12.63 N. baylissi (Mount Mabu) 9.08 9.08 N. mlanjensis (Mount Mulanje) 5.47 5.47
N. baylissi (Mount Mabu) 77.73 N. franklinae sp. nov. (Mount Namuli) 13.20 13.20 N. evanescens sp. nov. (Mount Inago) 9.18 9.18 N. evanescens sp. nov. (Mount Inago) 5.87
N. nubila sp. nov. (Mount Chiperone) 78.39 N. evanescens sp. nov. (Mount Inago) 13.12 N. franklinae sp. nov. (Mount Namuli) 9.54 N. franklinae sp. nov. (Mount Namuli) 6.10
p = 0.016 p = 0.015 p = 0.028 p = 0.003
TL: tail length; ML: from tip of rostral to rictus; CE: measured diagonally from posterior margin of orbit to superior tip of casque; CC: measured across the crown between raised supraorbital crests at mid-eye.

Systematic account

Using the integrative taxonomic framework of Padial et al. (2010), we evaluated the combined evidence for the hypothesis that each montane sky island harbours a distinct species. For Step 1 of the framework, we set up an original hypothesis in terms of geographic isolation. We suggest that populations isolated in montane forests that are separated by more than 50 km may represent separate species. This was supported by our findings that show these populations have likely been isolated since the late Miocene (5–6 million years ago [Mya]). However, the absence of syntopy among species results in having insufficient evidence to recognise them as distinct species based only on geographic information. For Step 2, we evaluated reproductive isolation. Although no obvious ornamental traits associated with mate recognition were observed, males show qualitative colour differences among candidate and described species, which may represent pre-zygotic barriers; however a quantitative assessment of colouration related to sexual selection would be required to validate this supposition. This step therefore provides some support for species separation, albeit not specifically quantified due to low sample sizes and lack of colouration data from live animals. For Step 3, we examined additional unlinked taxonomic characters, offering further support for lineage diversification: morphology and phenotype are conservative yet roughly diagnosable; mitochondrial and combined genetic datasets show clear divergence without paraphyly; the nuclear genome exhibits limited allele sharing, differences in allele frequencies, and the presence of unique alleles. In Step 4, we assessed other relevant evidence for lineage separation, which cumulatively reinforces the support established in Steps 1–3. The lack of immigration between forest patches and the inferred cessation of gene flow since the late Miocene support a scenario of allopatric speciation via vicariance. Moreover, these chameleons are highly specialised for forest habitats, with no individuals recorded outside intact forest, indicating no dispersal across surrounding savanna or agricultural landscapes. Observations of these chameleons in the wild, coupled to quantitative studies of chameleon movement strongly suggest low vagility (e.g., Rebelo et al. 2022; Stanton-Jones et al. 2025), and we can infer that movement between forest patches is unlikely.

In summary, this integrative evaluation shows there is lineage divergence and evolution of species properties among Nadzikambia populations sufficiently adequate to demonstrate each population is a separately evolving meta-population, consistent with the General Lineage Species Concept. We propose that the conservative phenotype is due to stabilising selection that has retained the ancestral phenotype, given the similarity of the forest habitats across the sky islands. However, we observed some (qualitative) colouration differences, particularly among males, although hemipenial morphology does not exhibit consistent structural differences among the candidate and described species. There is divergence for both the nuclear and the mitochondrial genomes, albeit weaker for the nuclear genome. Probability of gene flow between mountains is low and estimated dates of vicariance are in the late Miocene some 5–6 Mya.

No historical names are available for the new Nadzi­kambia species, thus leaving no outstanding taxonomic or nomenclatural concerns. Below we provide a systematic review of Nadzikambia, including identification of threats to each species.

Note on the generic common name: We chose to call this genus of chameleons “sylvan chameleons” because of their obligate forest lifestyle. We acknowledge that many species in other genera of chameleons (e.g., Bradypodion, Kinyongia, Rhampholeon, Brookesia, Calumma), also are forest specialists. However, for Nadzikambia we choose to highlight the fact that they are intimately bound to primary rainforest and are not known to adapt to conditions outside this habitat by reflecting this in their common name. In addition, these chameleons can be likened to sylvan sprites – the mythical creatures that protect forests, and who also watch over those who preserve and protected, not destroy, forests. Indeed, the rate of forest destruction on these mountains is rapid and uncontrolled, and the forests lack adequate protection, despite each of these mountains being classified as a Key Biodiversity Area (WCS 2021). It is our hope that the common names as well as the scientific names given to these chameleons will draw attention to the current, desperate plight of these forests and their inhabitants.

Nadzikambia mlanjensis Broadley, 1965

Figures 4A, 5A, 6A; Table 3

Mulanje sylvan chameleon

Figure 6. 

Life photos of Nadzikambia: A adult male N. mlanjensis (PEM R18445), B adult male N. baylissi (unvouchered specimen), C adult holotype male N. franklinae sp. nov. (PEM R21165), D adult holotype male N. goodallae sp. nov. (PEM R24394), E adult holotype male N. evanescens sp. nov. (PEM R24372), F adult paratype female N. nubila sp. nov. (NHMUK 2025.3278).

Holotype.

NMZB-UM 4268, an adult male, collected ‘in the Ruo Gorge Forest on Mlanje Mountain’, Malawi by D.G. Broadley and L. Balarin on 20 December 1962.

General description.

A small, slender, long-tailed chameleon (SVL = 46.4–81.7 mm; TL = 51.0–95.6 mm) with the tail longer than the body (TL/SVL = 1.0–1.3). Head short and narrow, with a slightly elevated casque, rounded posteriorly. Parietal crest reduced, comprising 3–5 moderately enlarged, keeled scales. Temporal crest absent. Lateral crest formed by 9–12 irregularly raised tubercles curving postero-superiorly from the orbital rim to the tip of the casque. Supraorbital crest of 12–15 elongate scales extending forward as a strongly tuberculated canthus rostralis. Canthus rostralis weakly developed or absent, occasionally forming small protrusions or ‘horns’ in males. Nostril rhombic, posteriorly directed, situated midway between the tip of the snout and the orbit. Upper labials 13–17, lower labials 16–18. Gular crest absent. Gular grooves fine and inconspicuous. Dorsal crest short, consisting of 0–12 low conical tubercles, more pronounced in males. Ventral crest absent. Body scales relatively homogeneous, flattened, and often arranged in irregular rosettes on the lower flanks; scales on the limbs rounded and separated by minute granules. Tail smooth, dorso-ventrally flattened and tapering distally to a fine tip.

Hemipenis (Fig. 5A). The everted hemipenis is stout, with a short, unadorned pedicel. The asulcal surface is covered in shallow, non-papillate calyces that are slightly transversely enlarged and arranged in eight longitudinal series. The sulcal surface is more complex, with the sulcus spermaticus draining into a wide, shallow, sub-triangular distal cup. Sulcal folds are smooth and unadorned proximally. A pair of subconical bulges is present at the proximal edge of the apex. The apex lacks rotulae and bears two large papillae lobes with scalloped distal edges that partially enclose a prominent midline mucosal hump. Each lobe carries smaller superimposed papillae on its surface, and a cluster of large papillae is present at the base of the lobes. The lateral surface of the truncus is smooth.

Colouration in life (Fig. 6A). Males exhibit a light greyish-green background colour, with the ventrum and base of the tail paler than the anterior two-thirds of the body. The flanks bear two pale brown, triangular bars, and a thin, dark grey-brown broken band extending posteriorly from below the lateral crest of the head, terminating approximately two-thirds along the body length. The interstitial skin between the rosette-like body scales is dark grey along the flanks and beige elsewhere. Scales on the crown are predominantly orange-brown, interspersed with scattered bluish scales. The area below the lateral crest, including the snout below the canthus rostralis and the labial margin, is light yellow-orange, while the gular region is light green with white interstitial skin. The tail is a mixture of light green and yellow, becoming progressively browner anteriorly. Females are bright green overall, with the dorsal surface of the head and crown above the lateral crest brick red. The flanks are uniformly green, occasionally retaining faint brown, wineglass-shaped blotches and scattered yellow scales. The ventral surfaces are off-white, with a distinct white mid-ventral line extending from the chest to the cloaca.

Sexual dimorphism subtle; males exhibit a slightly higher casque, more pronounced rugose canthal tubercles, and slightly longer tail (TL/SVL = 1.16) compared to females (TL/SVL = 1.06). Largest male (PEM R18445): 81.7 (SVL) mm + 85.8 (TL) mm = 167.5 mm total length; largest female (PEM R18445): 84 mm + 94 mm = 178 mm (Stevens 1968). Summary of all measurements can be found in Table 3.

Natural history.

Oviparous. Gravid females were collected in the months of January (this study) and February (Stevens 1968; Tilbury 2018). Clutch sizes ranged from 7 to 10 eggs (8.0 mean), in our specimens, but was reported as low as six by Tilbury (2018). Oviductal eggs measured 14.1–17.0 (15.4 ± 0.8 standard deviation) mm in length and 6.7–8.2 (7.6 ± 0.5) mm in width. In the month of November, a presumed hatchling measuring 27.5 mm SVL was collected. In November 2009, an adult male (PEM R18445) was observed falling from a height into the leaf litter below during broad daylight. Upon capture, a clear bite mark was noted on the dorsal crest, likely inflicted by either a bird or another Nadzikambia. It is presumed that, during the attack, the chameleon dislodged itself and fell to the forest floor for safety. The orbital crest in this specimen and other males examined (PEM R18143–44) shows clear damage consistent with male–male combat in the form of bite marks which appear as V shaped scars (see Petford et al. 2024).

Habitat.

The original species description (Broadley 1965) states only: “The holotype was six feet from the ground, clinging to one of the lianas festooning a tree beside the path from the Lujeri Estate power house through the forest to the Ruo Falls. The Ruo Gorge has an annual rainfall of well over 100 inches.” Since 1965, additional records and observations have been made suggesting the species once occupied lowland, mid-elevation, sub-montane and montane evergreen forest between 600 and 2000 m a.s.l. above which was probably high elevation grassland (Dowsett-Lemaire and Dowsett 1988). It is assumed that chameleons use the entire canopy strata, despite all observations being within a few metres above the observer’s standpoint from the ground. The habitat can be generalised to closed-canopy forest reaching tens of meters high, with occasional small gaps in the canopy particularly along stream gullies.

Distribution.

Occurs in the remaining forest fragments on Mount Mulanje (Figs 1, 7). A single holotype was collected “in the Ruo Gorge Forest” (Broadley 1965) which lies on the southern slope of Mount Mulanje above the ‘power house’, a hydro-electric station for the Lujeri tea estate, which covers the southern foothills of Mount Mulanje. The elevation for the holotype was not provided nor was the distance from the power house (–15.991; 35.6608, 760 m a.s.l.) nor from the Ruo Gorge falls (–15.933; 35.647, 1650 m a.s.l.), which lies approximately 6.7 km above the power house, so a more accurate location is difficult to ascertain.

Figure 7. 

Detailed map of Mount Mulanje with polygons showing the extent of forest as of 2004–2008 (yellow; images used from a range of years to provide best overall mapping resolution) and 2025 (green). Light blue polygon shows the likely historical forest extent between 600–2000 m a.s.l. where chameleons may have occurred. Dark blue shows the area > 2000 m which was likely to have been high elevation grassland. Top map shows the Google Earth imagery as of 2025, whereas the bottom map shows the imagery circa 2006. Map data 2025 © Google.

The first estimate of distribution size was 61 km2 with an elevation range of 1100 to 1900 m a.s.l., occurring in Ruo Gorge and a forest patch near Lichenya hut (Tolley 2014). However, with new museum and public database records, it can be assumed that the species occurs in additional forest patches from about 600 m to nearly 2000 m elevation (Fig. 7). Notably, there have been several recent records from tiny remnant patches of lowland forest supporting the argument that the forest was once more extensive and contiguous down to about 630 m elevation (Dowsett-Lemaire and Dowsett 1988) but has since been transformed by agriculture. There are also several larger patches of forest higher on the mountain slopes where it is assumed, but not yet confirmed, the species should occur (Fig. 7). In addition, Mount Mchese lies about 5 km to the north of Mount Mulanje and with the original forest likely being more extensive, the forest may have been contiguous between them, supporting a widespread population. However, this requires confirmation and therefore Mount Mchese is not currently included within the range of N. mlanjensis.

Conservation.

Recent photos from Ruo Gorge on the south slopes of Mulanje show that the entire area is currently under active deforestation from illegal logging (Fig. 8), with the forest patch essentially no longer ecologically intact (T. Brammer pers. comm. 2025). Some recent satellite images from public databases (e.g., ­Google Earth, Global Forest Change) do not yet record this loss (see Hansen et al. 2013; https://glad.earthengine.app/view/glo­bal-forest-change). With the loss of the Ruo Gorge forest, the remaining patches total a maximum of ~15.8 km2 but is likely lower given that other areas appear to be under deforestation at present. Anecdotal reports suggest that the patch at Lichenya Hut is also being logged at present (T. Brammer pers. comm. 2025), and recent Google Earth imagery shows that the eastern slopes of the mountain have been denuded of vegetation (Fig. 7). Some of mapped patches are very small, ranging from 0.012 to 7.2 km2, and the patches are disconnected, with most separated by transformed habitat. The combination of extremely small patches (with presumably small populations) and lack of connectivity among patches point to a very high medium-term extinction risk for this species.

Figure 8. 

Widescale forest loss at Ruo Gorge, Mount Mulanje, Malawi. Photos from the same viewpoint shows the comparison of the intact forest (in 2019) to the current state of destruction (2024). Photos courtesy of Hendrik Pretorius (top) and Maggie O’Toole (bottom).

As of the 1980’s the estimated forest remaining at Mount Mulanje was ca. 70 km2 across all forest types from lowland (from 650 m) to montane (up to 2300 m; Dowsett-Lemaire 1988; Dowsett-Lemaire and Dowsett 1988). However, the forest was already party transformed at that time and probably was more extensive historically given the tiny remaining patches that occur in the lowlands, up to several kilometres distant from the mountain (Fig. 7). Assuming these outlying forest patches were historically connected to the patches on the mountain itself, and assuming a fairly even distribution of forest down to about 650 m a.s.l. on the southern side of the mountain, the historical forest extent could have been as great as ca. 380 km2.

The convex hull around the mapped forest patches suggests an upper limit for the Extent of Occurrence (EOO: convex polygon surrounding all forest patches) at about 299 km2, with a lower estimate of 135 km2 if the non-surveyed patches and recently deforested Ruo Gorge are excluded. The Area of Occupancy (AOO) mapped as the total summed area of the number of 2x2 km grid cells of forest, assumed to be occupied (IUCN Standards and Petitions Committee 2022) but excluding Ruo Gorge is estimated as 64 km2. The AOO could be as great as 136 km2 if Ruo Gorge and the unsurvey forest patches on the eastern and the western slopes are included. The global population is considered severely fragmented given the small remaining habitat patches and the severe disconnect between them. Currently, this species is considered Endangered (Tolley 2014) due to the small extent of occurrence, the severe population fragmentation and the ongoing decline in habitat quality and extent. The recent intensive habitat loss at Ruo Gorge and the presumed impacts at other forest patches necessitates an urgent IUCN reassessment for this species.

Nadzikambia baylissi Branch & Tolley, 2010

Figures 4B, 5B, 6B; Table 3

Mabu sylvan chameleon

Holotype.

PEM R18055, an adult male, collected form the Mount Mabu forest base camp (–16.2861; 36.4006, 967 m a.s.l.), Zambézia Province, Mozambique by W.R. Branch and W. Conradie on 30 May 2009.

General description.

A small, slender, long-tailed chameleon (SVL = 61.1–74.2 mm; TL = 65.3–94.4 mm) with the tail longer than the body (TL/SVL = 1.0–1.3). Head short and narrow, with a slightly elevated casque, rounded posteriorly. Parietal crest reduced, comprising 3–4 moderately enlarged, keeled scales. Temporal crest absent. Lateral crest formed by 8–13 irregularly raised tubercles curving postero-superiorly from the orbital rim to the tip of the casque. Supraorbital crest of 13–15 elongate scales extending forward as a strongly tuberculated canthus rostralis. Canthus rostralis weakly developed or absent, occasionally forming small protrusions or ‘horns’ in males. Nostril rhombic, posteriorly directed, situated midway between the tip of the snout and the orbit. Upper labials 16–19, lower labials 16–20. Gular crest absent. Gular grooves fine and inconspicuous. Dorsal crest short, consisting of 0–9 low conical tubercles, more pronounced in males. Ventral crest absent. Body scales relatively homogeneous, flattened, and often arranged in irregular rosettes on the lower flanks; scales on the limbs rounded and separated by minute granules. Tail smooth, dorsolaterally flattened, and tapering distally.

Hemipenis (Fig. 5B). Similar in general structure to N. mlanjensis, differing only in having the asulcal calyces arranged in 8–9 longitudinal series and sulcal folds more prominent with a central groove.

Colouration in life (Fig. 6B). Males exhibit a light greyish-green background colour, with the ventrum and base of the tail paler than the anterior two-thirds of the body. The flanks bear two pale orange-brown, triangular bars, and a thin dark red-brown stripe extending posteriorly from below the lateral crest of the head, terminating approximately two-thirds along its length. The interstitial skin between the rosette-like body scales is a darker green. Scales on the crown are predominantly pale greenish-blue with scattered smaller orange-brown scales, diffused borders. The area below the lateral crest, including the snout below the canthus rostralis and the labial margin, is bright green, while the gular region is light green and the labials are brown. The tail bears a mixture of light green and brown scales. Females are bright green overall, with the dorsal surface of the head and crown above the lateral crest dark orange-red. The flanks are uniformly green, occasionally retaining faint brown, wineglass-shaped blotches and scattered yellow scales. The ventral surfaces are off-white, with a distinct white mid-ventral line extending from the chest to the cloaca.

Sexual dimorphism subtle; males exhibit a slightly higher casque, more rugose canthal tubercles, and slightly longer tail (TL/SVL = 1.21) compared to females (TL/SVL = 1.17). Largest male (PEM R21128): 74.2 mm SVL + 94.4 mm TL = 168.6 mm total length; largest female (PEM R21130): 66.6 mm + 75.3 mm = 141.9 mm total length. Summary of all measurements can be found in Table 3.

Natural history.

No ova or eggs were present in specimens collected in the months of November (Conradie et al. 2016) or May–June (Branch and Tolley 2010). The absence of ova or eggs in November may indicate that the females had already deposited their eggs, as other females collected at the same time of the year from other inselbergs were gravid (see species accounts below). The orbital crest in male specimens examined (PEM R18055, PEM R21131, PEM R21128) shows clear damage consistent with male–male combat.

Habitat.

Occurs in the mid-elevation wet forest on Mount Mabu (Figs 1, 9; Branch and Tolley 2010). The forest habitat on Mount Mabu occurs between ca. 1000 to 1400 m a.s.l, characterised by a thick, closed-canopy reaching tens of meters high (Branch and Tolley 2010; Bayliss et al. 2014), with occasional small gaps in the canopy particularly along stream gullies.

Figure 9. 

Detailed map of Mount Mabu showing the extent of forest as of 2025 (green polygon). The extent of forest has not notably changed since the earliest Google Earth imagery available (2014). Map data 2025 © Google.

Distribution.

Occurs only in Afrotemperate forest at medium to high elevations of Mount Mabu, Mozambique (Fig. 9).

Conservation.

Although most of the forest is still intact (Fig. 9), this chameleon is currently considered Near Threatened (Tolley et al. 2019). It is at risk due to encroachment from slash and burn clearing along the forest edges which has an impact on the ecological integrity of the forest and could cause directly mortality of chameleons through injury during tree felling and bush clearing by fire. Currently, the forest is about 48 km2 in total area (Fig. 9), but it is not known if it was once more extensive as the available satellite imagery is not sufficient to assess this. The present-day Area of Occupancy (AOO) mapped as the total summed area of the number of 2x2 km grid cells assumed to be occupied (IUCN Standards and Petitions Committee 2022) is 64 km2, and Extent of Occurrence (EOO: convex polygon surrounding the forest edges but upscaled to match the AOO as per the IUCN guidelines) is also 64 km2. Given this species is at risk due to encroachment causing forest loss, and there is a future plausible threat of rapid declines with increased deforestation rates, a reassessment of extinction risk is needed.

Nadzikambia franklinae sp. nov.

Figures 4C, 5E–F, 5C, 10; Tables 3, 5

Nadzikambia baylissiConradie et al. (2016: 171, in part)

Nadzikambia aff. baylissiBayliss et al. (2024: table SI1)

Namuli sylvan chameleon

Figure 10. 

Holotype (PEM R21165) male of Nadzikambia franklinae sp. nov. A lateral full body, B lateral close-up of head, C dorsal close-up of head, D ventral close-up of head. Scale bar = 10 mm.

Table 5.

Measurements (mm) for the type series of Nadzikambia franklinae sp. nov. from Mount Namuli, Mozambique (PEM – Port Elizabeth Museum). See Methods for description of measurements. T = truncated.

Catalogue No PEM R21165 PEM R21167 PEM R21164 PEM R21166 PEM R21188 PEM R21189 PEM R21190
Type status Holotype Paratype Paratype Paratype Paratype Paratype Paratype
Sex Male Female Female Female Female Female Female
SVL 70.3 75.4 77.4 74.5 73.0 70.7 79.3
TL 88.1 78.4 86.3 78.0 75.1 57.08T 79.0
ToL 158.4 153.8 163.7 152.5 148.1 158.2
TL/SVL 1.25 1.04 1.12 1.05 1.03 1.00
HL 22.6 20.9 23.8 23.2 22.4 23.2 23.2
HW 11.1 10.5 10.7 10.5 11.5 10.3 11.0
HH 14.5 12.7 14.8 13.4 13.7 13.7 13.4
ML 14.3 13.9 14.2 14.6 14.3 14.3 14.5
CE 10.8 9.2 11.1 10.2 10.4 10.4 10.3
SL 7.4 6.7 7.4 7.3 7.2 8.1 7.6
ED 6.9 6.6 7.5 7.4 6.5 6.0 6.7
CC 7.1 6.7 6.7 6.1 6.2 6.9 6.7
IL 41.3 44.9 45.4 40.4 42.5 39.8 48.5
FLL 13.0 13.2 13.8 13.5 13.2 12.2 13.1
HLL 12.7 12.0 13.1 12.9 11.2 12.4 11.8

Holotype.

PEM R21165, an adult male, collected downstream from below the Mahno Forest satellite camp, Mount Namuli (–15.3987; 37.0183, 1632 m a.s.l.), Zambézia Province, Mozambique by S. Loader, M. Menegon and K.A. Tolley on 27 November 2014.

Paratypes.

6 specimens: PEM R21164 and PEM R21667, gravid females, same collection details as holotype. PEM R21188, PEM R21189 and PEM R21190, gravid females, collected from near the stream of Ukalini Forest, Mount Namuli (–15.3694; 37.0614, 1618 m a.s.l.), Zambézia Province, Mozambique by G. Bittencourt-Silva, S. Loader and M. Menegon on 29 November 2014.

Etymology.

The new species is named after the British chemist Rosalind Franklin (1920–1958) whose work on X-Ray crystallography, particularly her legendary “photo 51”, revealed the structure of DNA (Franklin and Gosling 1953). Her ground-breaking work subsequently allowed for the field of phylogenetics to develop, decades later. Today, nearly all modern taxonomy is phylogenetically informed, including the description of N. franklinae sp. nov.

Diagnosis.

The new species is assigned to the genus Nadzikambia based on several distinctive characteristics, including a short stout hemipenis with no apical rotulae, the absence of gular and ventral crests, a weakly developed dorsal crest, a low casque, and heterogeneous body scales that form rosettes of tubercles on the lower flanks (Tilbury et al. 2006). This assignment is further supported by monophyly observed in both mitochondrial and nuclear genes (Tilbury et al. 2006; Branch and Tolley 2010).

The new species can be distinguished from other species of Nadzikambia by a combination of the following characters: lower average number upper labials (15.5 versus 16.3–17.3 in other populations, except from N. mlanjensis which have 15.2), lower average number of lower labials (16.4 versus 17.0–18.1); casque in adult males higher and rounder – similar to N. evanescens sp. nov. (versus flat and extending laterally in N. mlanjensis and N. goodallae sp. nov. and marginally raised and rounded in N. baylissi); scales on posterior and lateral crown of head smooth – similar to N. evanescens sp. nov. and N. baylissi (versus rugose in N. mlanjensis and N. goodallae sp. nov.).

Additionally, the new species occurs in allopatry from all congeneric species, with the closest geographical relative being N. evanescens sp. nov. (approx. 45 km away) and differs genetically from other Nadzikambia species by: 0.4–4.5% 16S, 3.2–12.3% ND2, and 4.2–13.6% ND4 uncorrected net p distances (Table 2).

Holotype description.

Adult male (70.3 mm SVL + 88.1 TL = 158.1 mm total length; mass: 8.6 g), with fully everted hemipenis. The specimen has a single ventral incision in the chest region for tissue sample extraction and a small incision on the anterior ventral side of the tail to sever the retractor muscle.

Head short (HL/SVL = 0.32) and narrow (HW = 11.1 mm), distance from tip of snout to the superior edge of the casque is twice the width of the head (HL/HW = 2.03). The casque is slightly elevated above the nape, elongated, and its posterior apex points backward to a rounded rim. The crown of the head is flattened posteriorly, is centrally and anteriorly depressed, and features rugose raised scales (except along the parietal crest), abutting with a few interspersed smaller granules. The largest scales are located along the midline of the snout, adjacent to the parietal crest, and alongside the lateral and supraorbital crests, with six scales present between the orbital crests at mid-orbit. A reduced parietal crest is present on the crown, composed of three moderately raised, enlarged, keeled scales that increase in size posteriorly. Anteriorly, the parietal crest splits into one right and two left weakly raised, keeled scales, forming a V-shape. The crown is bordered on both sides by raised tubercles of the lateral and supraorbital crests and at the rear by the casque. The temporal crest is absent. The lateral crest consists of 10/11 (right/left) raised, irregular tubercular scales that arise from the mid-upper rim of the orbit and curve upward around the casque. The supraorbital crest extends from the lateral crest at the upper posterior rim of the orbit, continuing forward over the eye as a rugose canthus rostralis onto the snout. It is composed of a series of 12/13 raised scales, with the three anterior scales most conical tubercles of the canthus on the snout being much more elevated and prominent than the supraorbitals. The canthus rostralis consists of three elevated scales. The first scale is significantly higher than the adjacent scales, giving the impression of a small horn, while the second scale is much wider than the surrounding ones. A single row of scales separates the anterior canthus rostralis from the upper labials on the snout. The orbit is separated from the upper labials by a single row of small granules. Scales around the eye are elongated, longer than wide, with nine scales above and nine below the orbit.

The nostril is rhombic, posteriorly directed, and positioned midway between the tip of the snout and the front of the orbit. It is separated from the upper labials by two rows of granules, with the scales in direct contact with the nostril much smaller than the larger ones in contact with the upper labials. The nostril is also separated from the orbit and the supraorbital crest by two rows of scales each. No enlarged rostral or mental scales are present. The upper labials (13/14) are sub-hexagonal and subequal in size, with the largest scales located from the tip of the snout to the level of the posterior rim of the eye; scales at the rictus are smaller and more rounded. The lower labials (15/15) are similarly sub-hexagonal and subequal in size, with the largest scales extending from the snout to the posterior rim of the eye; scales at the rictus are also smaller and more rounded. Scales bordering the lower labials are irregularly shaped and subequal in size to the lower labials. Gular grooves are fine and inconspicuous. There is no gular crest. The tubercles of the gular region are round and raised, with the smallest scales located centrally and increasing in size toward the lower labials. The dorsal crest is weakly developed and represented by eight to ten slightly enlarged conical tubercles, largest anteriorly. A ventral crest is absent.

Body scales are relatively homogeneous and flattened, abutting one another and forming irregularly scattered rosettes on the lower flanks, which consist of clusters of two to four scales. Scales on the flanks and toward the vertebral ridge are separated by fine granules on the upper flanks. The smallest scales are located on the belly and are more conical in shape, while the largest, squarish scales are found along the flanks and the paravertebral zone. Scales on the limbs are homogeneous and rounded, separated by minute granules, with the largest scales located on the outer surfaces of the lower leg and forearm.

Soles of hindfeet and forefeet are covered with closely fit smooth round tubercles. Scales above hands and feet heterogenous, larger posteriorly getting smaller anteriorly. Scales under digits slightly larger than those on the soles and more elongated. The scales on the digits directly adjacent to the claws are enlarged, followed by a similarly sized scale that is occasionally split into two.

The tail is longer than the body (TL/SVL = 1.25), dorso-ventrally flattened and tapering distally to a fine tip. The dorsal and lateral scales are squarish and larger than the more rounded ventral scales.

Hemipenis (Fig. 5E, F). Similar in general structure to N. mlanjensis, differing only in having a more prominent flattened midline mucosal hump (similar to N. evanescens sp. nov.).

Colouration in life (Fig. 6C). Dorsal surface predominantly olive to yellowish-green, often suffused with diffuse orange-brown tones. Flanks mottled with irregular dark green to brown blotches forming two indistinct, vertically oriented triangular bars. A dark green lateral band extends posteriorly from behind the eye, below the lateral crest, terminating near the mid-flank; a paler light brownish-green stripe occurs immediately below this band. Interstitial skin between the lateral flank scales dark green. The area below the lateral crest and along the temporal region light yellow-green. Labials distinctly pinkish-brown, contrasting sharply with the surrounding yellow-green of the head. Limbs light green with scattered, irregular darker green bands. Ventral surfaces pale greenish to whitish, the gular region slightly yellowish. The ventral surface has a narrow, pale white line extending between the limbs. Tail yellow-green proximally, grading to light brown distally. Iris pale greyish-brown with fine dark reticulations.

Colouration in preservation (Fig. 10). Predominantly dark purplish-black colouration across the body, with faded patches of lighter scales. The head is mostly purplish-black, with slightly paler regions visible on the crown, around the eyes, and behind the corners of the mouth. A few scattered brownish scales are present behind the head. The gular region is dark purplish along the sides, transitioning to a lighter purplish tone along the midline, with the inner scale skin appearing white. The flanks are uniformly dark purplish, interrupted by a faint pale bar above the forelimbs that extends from the spine to the area behind the arm. A second, less distinct pale bar is visible anterior to the hind limbs, spanning from the spine to the lower flank. A row of mid-lateral scales shows a faint brownish tint. The ventral surface has a narrow, pale white line extending between the limbs. Inner limb surface lighter purple with white inner skin. Sole of feet white. The tail is dark purple with two faint, paler transverse bars near its base.

Paratype variation.

Measurements for the type series of Nadzikambia franklinae sp. nov. are summarised in Table 5. All paratypes are adult females. The size of the females ranges from 70.7–79.3 (mean: 75) mm SVL and 75.1–86.3 (79.4) mm TL. The tail is longer than the body, with an SVL/TL ratio of 1.00–1.12 (1.05). While the type series includes only a single adult male, the females, on average, exhibit a shorter tail (mean TL/SVL: 1.05 in females versus 1.25 in the male). Gravid females weighed between 13.5–18.7 g (15.7 ± 1.9 g).

The general scalation of the females is very similar to that of the holotype, differing only in minor details. The cranial crests are not as rugose, and the canthus rostralis is not elevated to form protrusions or ‘horns’. The upper labials number 15–17 (15.8), while the lower labials range from 15–17 (16.4). The lateral crest consists of 9–12 scales (10.3), the supraorbital crest has 10–14 scales (12.6), and the dorsal crest includes 3–8 scales (5). The body scalation on the flanks varies from closely fitted scales to scales separated by smaller granules dorsally.

In life, the paratype females display a lime green colouration on the body, legs, gular, and lower surfaces of the head. The ventrum, inner surfaces of the limbs, and soles of the feet are light blue-grey, with a thin white mid-ventral line. The flank bars are reduced to irregular, diffuse light brown blotches. The tail is suffused with a dirty red-orange hue. The scales covering the eyes are blue-white, while the crown of the head is orange-red posteriorly and green anteriorly. In preservative, the head and body become very dark, almost purple-black, with all normal colouration lost except for the thin white mid-ventral line.

Natural History.

All females, except one, were heavily gravid with mature oviductal eggs nearly ready for laying when collected in the month of November. Clutch sizes ranged from 7 to 10 eggs (8.8), with oviductal eggs measuring 13.6–15.2 (14.2 ± 0.4) mm in length and 7.5–8.8 (7.8 ± 0.3) mm in width. The eggs (n = 8) of the one exception were not fully developed and measured, on average 8.2 × 7.0 mm. Gravid females weighed between 13.5–18.7 (15.7 ± 1.9) g.

Habitat.

All specimens were collected in an evergreen mid-elevation wet forest between 1618–1632 m a.s.l. They were found at night perched on tree branches at heights of 5–8 m above the ground but are likely to also occur higher in the canopy. The habitat consists of a closed-canopy forest reaching tens of meters high, with occasional small gaps in the canopy along stream gullies.

Distribution.

Currently only known from the small remaining fragmented patches of mid-elevation wet forest of Mount Namuli (Figs 1, 11) in northern Mozambique. Individuals have been recorded from small forest patches – Ukalini Forest (~ 0.47 km2) near the Namuli (northernmost) granite dome associated with the Napuesa and Nanchili rivers (headwater tributaries of the Malema River) and Manho Forest, a once larger patch of mid-elevation wet forest to the south that is associated to the eastern tributary of the headwaters of the Licungo River, running below (eastern side) the Pilani and Peseni granite domes. The remaining habitat at Manho Forest consists of two tiny patches, each approximately 0.1 km2 in size.

Figure 11. 

Detailed map of Mount Namuli showing the extent of forest as of 2009 (yellow polygons), and as of 2024 (green polygons). The blue polygon shows the estimated additional extent of forest as of ca. 1930 as described by Vincent (1933). Top map shows the Google Earth imagery in 2024, whereas the bottom map shows the imagery as of 2009. Map data 2025 © Google.

Conservation.

The mountain is heavily impacted by small scale commercial agriculture and subsistence farming for crops such as maize and potato. The forest destruction has been continuous over the last several decades and the impact has not ceased. Historical satellite images from Google Earth shows that as of 2009 the mid-elevation wet forest occurred in two main areas at high elevations, for a total of approximately 10.8 km2 (Fig. 11). It is not known how widespread the forest was prior to the available satellite imagery but the natural habitat at Mount Namuli does consist of a matrix of forest and grassy savanna so it is possible that forest has been limited on the mountain historically. Nevertheless, historical surveys of the mountain (Last 1887; Vincent 1933) recorded far more widespread forest. Ukalini Forest extended 3–4 km eastwards from its current extent (Vincent 1933), and a now extinct forest patch, Ukasini, once occurred to the east of Ukalini (Vincent 1933). At present, most of the forest on Namuli has been destroyed in favour of agriculture, and the estimated remaining habitat is in three very small patches totalling ca. 0.67 km2. This represents a loss of > 90% of the entire distribution of this species over a period of about 15 years. The present-day estimate of the Extent of Occurrence (EOO: convex polygon surrounding the forest edges but upscaled to match the AOO as per the IUCN guidelines) is 8 km2 and the Area of Occupancy (AOO) mapped as the total summed area of the number of 2x2 km grid cells assumed to be occupied (IUCN Standards and Petitions Committee 2022) is 8 km2. The population can be considered severely fragmented with no habitat patch holding > 50% of the entire population, and there is an ongoing decline in forest extent.

Nadzikambia goodallae sp. nov.

Figures 4D, 5D, 6D, 12; Tables 3, 6

Nadzikambia aff. baylissiBayliss et al. (2024: table SI1)

Ribáuè sylvan chameleon

Figure 12. 

Holotype (PEM R24394) male of Nadzikambia goodallae sp. nov. A lateral full body, B lateral close-up of head, C dorsal close-up of head, D ventral close-up of head. Scale bar = 10 mm.

Table 6.

Measurements (mm) for the type series of Nadzikambia goodallae sp. nov. from Mount Ribáuè, Mozambique (PEM – Port Elizabeth Museum; NHMUK – Natural History Museum, London). See Materials and Methods for description of measurements.

Catalogue No PEM R24394 NHMUK 2025.3273 NHMUK 2025.3274 PEM R24253 PEM R24395 PEM R24396
Type status Holotype Paratype Paratype Paratype Paratype Paratype
Sex Male Male Female Female Female Female
SVL 75.6 70.9 75.3 50.8 69.3 76.4
TL 99.6 87.7 84.6 58.8 76.9 82.4
ToL 175.2 158.6 159.9 109.6 146.2 158.8
TL/SVL 1.32 1.24 1.12 1.16 1.11 1.08
HL 24.6 22.6 21.9 16.8 21.6 22.7
HW 10.9 9.9 10.6 8.2 10.5 11.9
HH 15.1 13.8 12.8 11.1 13.0 13.5
ML 15.5 14.3 12.8 10.6 14.1 14.2
CE 11.0 10.3 9.3 7.5 9.3 9.5
SL 7.8 7.0 6.9 5.8 6.7 7.2
ED 8.2 8.2 6.9 5.5 7.6 8.1
CC 5.5 5.3 5.1 4.5 5.6 5.0
IL 40.1 37.2 45.0 27.5 41.3 43.7
FLL 14.0 13.5 12.6 9.5 13.1 13.4
HLL 13.3 12.6 12.6 8.5 12.1 12.1

Holotype.

PEM R24394, adult male, collected from the stream margin on Mount Ribáuè (–14.8841; 38.2498, 1055 m a.s.l.), Nampula Province, Mozambique by W. Conradie and K.A. Tolley on 4 December 2018.

Paratypes.

5 specimens: PEM R24395, gravid female, collected from the stream margin at Mount Ribáuè (–14.8841; 38.2497, 1066 m a.s.l.), Nampula Province, Mozambique by W. Conradie and K.A. Tolley, on 3 December 2018. PEM R24396, gravid female, collected near a stream on Mount Ribáuè (–14.8850; 38.2491, 1056 m a.s.l.), Nampula Province, Mozambique by W. Conradie and K.A. Tolley, on 4 December 2018. PEM R24253, subadult female, collected from the forested mountain slopes on Mount Ribáuè (–14.8809; 38.2462, 1142 m a.s.l.), Nampula Province, Mozambique by W. Conradie and K.A. Tolley on 14 April 2017. NHMUK 2025.3273, adult female, collected from the stream margin on Mount Ribáuè (–14.8846; 38.2495, 1052 m a.s.l.), Nampula Province, Mozambique by W. Conradie and K.A. Tolley on 3 December 2018. NHMUK 2025.3274, adult male, same details as previous specimen.

Etymology.

This species is named after Jane Goodall (1934–2025), an inspirational scientist who lived and worked in Africa throughout her lengthy career. Although her work was dedicated to the study of Pan troglodytes, the Chimpanzee, she spent much of her life living and working in tropical forest, in particular at Gombe National Park, Tanzania. Like her own study species, this chameleon is a forest endemic and the destruction of forest, and other habitats, both at Mount Ribáuè as well as within the home range of P. troglodytes in Central and West Africa is causing forest-living species to decline to the brink of extinction.

Diagnosis.

The new species is assigned to the genus Nadzikambia based on several distinctive characteristics, including a short stout hemipenis with no apical rotulae, the absence of gular and ventral crests, a weakly developed dorsal crest, a low casque, and heterogeneous body scales that form rosettes of tubercles on the lower flanks (Tilbury et al. 2006). This assignment is further supported by monophyly observed in both mitochondrial and nuclear genes (Tilbury et al. 2006; Branch and Tolley 2010).

The new species can be distinguished from other species of Nadzikambia by a combination of the following characters: average number upper labials (16.6 versus 15.2 in N. mlanjensis and 15.5 in N. franklinae sp. nov., similar to other species); highest average number lower labials (18.1 versus 16.4–17.7 in other populations), casque in adult males flat and extending laterally (versus higher and rounder in N. franklinae sp. nov. and N. eva­nescens sp. nov., marginally raised and rounded in N. baylissi, similar to N. mlanjensis); scales on posterior and lateral crown of head rugose (versus smooth in N. franklinae sp. nov., N. evanescens sp. nov., N. baylissi, similar to N. mlanjensis); higher number of raised lateral crest and suborbital tubercles (11.2 and 15.6 versus 10.0–10.8 and 12.5–14.5); anterior of crown of head (on snout) narrower between supraorbital crests and more conclave (versus broader, raised and flatter in other species).

Additionally, the new species occurs in allopatry from all congeneric species, with the closest geographical relative being N. evanescens sp. nov. (approx. 85 km away) and differs genetically from other Nadzikambia species by: 0.9–4.9% 16S, 3.8–13.3% ND2, and 4.4–13.2% ND4 uncorrected net p distances (Table 2).

Holotype description.

Adult male (75.6 mm SVL + 99.6 TL = 175.0 mm total length), with a fully everted hemipenis. The specimen has a single ventral incision in the chest region for tissue sample extraction and a small incision on the anterior ventral side of the tail to sever the retractor muscle.

Head short (HL/SVL = 0.33) and narrow (HW = 10.9 mm), distance from tip of snout to the superior tip of the casque is twice the width of the head (HL/HW = 2.26). The casque is slightly elevated above the nape, elongated, and its posterior apex points backward to a rounded rim. The crown of the head and casque is flattened posteriorly, is centrally and anteriorly depressed, and features are covered with raised rugose scales (except along the parietal crest), abutting with a few interspersed smaller granules. The largest scales are adjacent to the parietal crest, and alongside the lateral and supraorbital crests above the eyes, with five scales between the two supraorbital crests at the mid-orbital point. A reduced parietal crest is present on the casque, composed of four moderately raised, enlarged, keeled scales that increase in size posteriorly. Anteriorly, the parietal crest splits into two right and one left weakly raised, keeled scales, forming a V-shape. The crown is bordered by raised tubercles of the lateral crests. The temporal crest is absent. The lateral crest consists of 11/10 (right/left) raised, irregular tubercular scales that arise from the mid-upper rim of the orbit and curve upward around the casque. The supraorbital crest extends from the lateral crest at the upper posterior rim of the orbit, continuing forward over the eye and onto the snout as a rugose canthal crest. It is composed of a series of 15/17 tubercles, with the three anterior tubercles on the snout much larger, more elevated and elongated than those above the orbit. The canthus rostralis consists of three large elevated subconical tubercles, the two anterior tubercles are significantly larger than the third, giving the impression of small horns. Three rows of small scales separate the canthi from the upper labials on the snout. The orbit is separated from the upper labials by a single row of small granules. Scales around the eye are elongated, longer than wide, with 10 scales above and 11 below the orbit.

The nostril is rhombic, posteriorly directed, and positioned midway between the tip of the snout and the front of the orbit. It is separated from the upper labials by two rows of granules, with the scales in direct contact with the nostril much smaller than the larger ones in contact with the upper labials. The nostril is separated from the orbit by two rows of scales and three rows from the supraorbital crest. No enlarged rostral or mental scales are present. The upper labials (16/15) are sub-hexagonal and subequal in size, with the largest scales located from the tip of the snout to the posterior rim of the eye; scales at the rictus are smaller and more rounded. The lower labials (17/16) are similarly sub-hexagonal and subequal in size, with the largest scales extending from the snout to the posterior rim of the eye; scales at the rictus are also smaller and more rounded. Scales bordering the lower labials are irregularly shaped and subequal in size to the lower labials. Gular grooves are fine and inconspicuous. Gular scales are round and raised, with the smallest scales located centrally and increasing in size toward the lower labials. The dorsal crest is weakly developed with eight slightly enlarged subconical tubercles anteriorly. A ventral crest is absent.

Body scales are relatively homogeneous and flattened, abutting one another and forming irregularly scattered rosettes on the lower flanks. Scales on the flanks and toward the vertebral ridge are separated by fine granules on the upper flanks. The smallest scales are located on the belly and are more conical in shape, while the largest, squarish scales are found along the flanks and the paravertebral zone. Scales on the limbs are homogeneous and rounded, with no smaller scales separating them, with the largest scales located on the outer surfaces of the hindlimb and forelimb.

Soles of hindfeet and forefeet with closely fit smooth round scales. Scales above forefeet and hindfeet heterogenous, larger posteriorly getting smaller anteriorly. Scales under digits slightly larger than those on the soles and more elongated. The scales on the digits directly adjacent to the claws are enlarged, followed by a similarly sized scale that is occasionally split into two.

The tail is longer than the body (TL/SVL = 1.32), dorso-ventrally flattened, and tapering distally to a fine tip. The dorsal and lateral scales are squarish and larger than the more rounded ventral scales.

Hemipenis (Fig. 5D). Similar in general structure to N. mlanjensis, differing only in that the two subconical bulges is more dorso-ventrally flattened as opposed to the more rounded bulges seen in the other species.

Colouration in life (Fig. 6D). Dorsal ground colour light olive-green, overlaid with a diffuse reddish-brown suffusion most pronounced on the parietal region, casque, and anterior dorsum. Flanks with faint darker green to brownish mottling forming two indistinct triangle vertical bars. Interstitial skin between the flank scales pale green to beige. Casque and temporal regions suffused with maroon to russet tones, contrasting with the lateral surfaces of the head, which are bright green. Labials pale pinkish-brown, grading posteriorly into yellowish-green. Limbs light green with scattered darker tubercles and a faint brown hue proximally. Gular region pale greenish-yellow; ventral surfaces silvery-white with slight yellow suffusion anteriorly. Tail green proximally, becoming light brown distally, with fine darker mottling. Iris reddish-brown with fine dark reticulation.

Colouration in preservation (Fig. 12). Predominantly dark purplish-black colouration across the body, with faded patches of lighter scales. Scales on the crown a mixture of light purplish and white scales. The head is mostly purplish-black, with slightly paler regions visible on the crown, around the eyes, and behind the corners of the mouth. The gular region is dark purplish, lighter anteriorly and to the lower labials. The flanks are uniformly dark purplish. The belly has a faint narrow, pale white mid-ventral line extending from the forelimbs to the vent. Inner limb surface paler purple, with white inner scale skin. Sole of feet white. The tail is dark purple.

Paratype variation.

Measurements for the type series of Nadzikambia goodallae sp. nov. are presented in ­Table 6. The size of the females ranges from 50.8–76.4 (mean: 68.0) mm SVL and 58.8–84.6 (75.7) mm TL. The tail is longer than the body, with an SVL/TL ratio of 1.08–1.16 (1.12). While the type series includes only two adult males, the females, on average, exhibit a shorter tail (mean TL/SVL: 1.12 in females versus 1.28 in the male).

The paratype male (NHMUK 2025.3273) agrees with the holotype, except for minor differences in scale counts. The general scalation of the paratype females is very similar to that of the holotype and paratype male, differing only in minor details. The cranial crests are not as prominent and the canthus rostralis is not elevated to form small protrusions or ‘horns’. Parietal crest varies from three to four elevated scales. The upper labials number 15–19 (15.9), while the lower labials range from 16–21 (18.5). The lateral crest consists of 10–12 scales (11.1), the supraorbital crest has 14–18 scales (15.6), and the dorsal crest includes 0–7 scales (3.8). The body scalation on the flanks varies from closely opposed tubercles to scales separated by smaller granules dorsally.

In life, the paratype females displays a lime green colouration on the body, legs, gular, and lower surfaces of the head. The belly, inner surfaces of the limbs, and soles of the feet are a light blue-grey, with a prominent white mid-ventral line visible extending onto the ventral tail. The flank bars are either absent or appear as irregular, diffuse light blue-grey blotches. The tail maintains a consistent green colouration anteriorly, becoming more red-orange posteriorly to the tail tip. The scales covering the eyes are lime green, blending seamlessly with the body, while the large scales on the crown of the head have a distinct blue-grey to light brown colouration. In preservative, the paratype female’s head and body become very dark, almost purple-black, with all normal colouration lost except for the thin white mid-ventral line.

Natural History.

All males have damage to their orbital crest which we assume is due to male-male combat. One adult female (PEM R24296) collected in November was not gravid and might have already laid her clutch of eggs. The remaining two adult females (PEM R24395 and NHMUK 2025.3274) were heavily gravid with mature oviductal eggs nearly ready for laying when collected in November. Clutch sizes for both females were eight eggs, with oviductal eggs measuring 13.4–14.2 (13.8 ± 0.3) mm in length and 7.1–7.8 (7.4 ± 0.3 mm) mm in width.

Habitat.

All specimens were collected in an evergreen mid-elevation wet forest between 1052–1142 m a.s.l. on the western massif of Mount Ribáuè. They were found at night perched on tree branches at heights of 2–8 m above the ground but presumably also occur higher in the canopy. The habitat consists of a closed-canopy forest reaching tens of meters high, with occasional small gaps in the canopy along stream gullies.

Distribution.

Currently only known from the forest patches remaining on Mount Ribáuè in northern Mozambique (Figs 1, 13).

Figure 13. 

Detailed map of Mount Ribáuè with polygons showing the extent of forest as of 2025 (green) and 2013/2016 (yellow). Top map shows the Google Earth imagery as of 2025, whereas the bottom map shows the imagery as of 2016. Map data 2025 © Google.

Conservation.

Mount Ribáuè is heavily impacted by small scale commercial agriculture and subsistence farming for crops such as maize and potato. The forest destruction has been continuous over the last several decades and the impact has not ceased. Mount Ribáuè consists of two adjacent massifs separated by ~0.5 km of lower valley. Historical satellite images from Google Earth shows that as of circa 2016 the eastern massif, which is closer to the town of Ribáuè, had 3.7 km2 mid-elevation wet forest remaining at the highest elevations, with the lower slopes heavily impacted (Fig. 13). This forest has been reduced to ~2 km2 at present. The western massif has been more slowly impacted but is currently subjected to slash and burn clearing and has been reduced from 7.2 to 3.1 km2 since 2013. In total, the total distribution is estimated as 4.8 km2. The Area of Occupancy (AOO) mapped as the total summed area of the number of 2x2 km grid cells assumed to be occupied is 20 km2 and EOO (the convex polygon surrounding both remaining forest patches) is estimated at 31 km2. The population can be considered severely fragmented with no habitat patch holding > 50% of the entire population, and there is an ongoing decline in forest extent.

Nadzikambia evanescens sp. nov.

Figures 4E, 5C, 6E, 14; Tables 3, 7

Nadzikambia aff. baylissiBayliss et al. (2024: table SI1)

Nadzikambia sp. nov. – Foquet et al. (2024: 21)

Inago sylvan chameleon

Figure 14. 

Holotype (PEM R24372) male of Nadzikambia evanescens sp. nov. A lateral full body, B lateral close-up of head, C dorsal close-up of head, D ventral close-up of head. Scale bar = 10 mm.

Table 7.

Measurements (mm) for the type series of Nadzikambia evanescens sp. nov. from Mount Inago, Mozambique. (PEM – Port Elizabeth Museum; NHMUK – Natural History Museum of London). See Materials and Methods for description of measurements.

Catalogue No PEM R24372 NHMUK 2025.3275 NHMUK 2025.3276 PEM R24260 PEM R24362 PEM R24373 PEM R24376
Type status Holotype Paratype Paratype Paratype Paratype Paratype Paratype
Sex Male Female Female Female Female Female Female
SVL 78.1 59.4 78.8 54.1 68.4 76.0 68.9
TL 97.8 73.7 89.0 57.5 81.8 83.2 77.5
ToL 175.9 133.1 167.8 111.6 150.2 159.2 146.4
TL/SVL 1.25 1.24 1.13 1.06 1.20 1.10 1.13
HL 26.2 12.1 23.4 18.1 20.9 22.5 21.2
HW 12.4 10.6 11.3 8.0 10.2 12.1 9.9
HH 16.3 12.8 13.8 10.6 12.4 13.3 13.2
ML 15.6 14.0 15.0 11.0 13.0 13.8 13.5
CE 12.4 9.9 9.9 8.0 9.0 9.7 8.9
SL 7.9 7.3 7.5 5.4 6.4 7.5 6.8
ED 7.9 6.8 7.0 5.9 6.3 6.8 7.4
CC 6.8 5.9 6.2 5.0 5.8 6.6 5.8
IL 45.5 42.2 46.5 30.0 40.8 47.4 42.5
FLL 14.6 12.9 14.5 10.2 12.5 13.9 12.9
HLL 13.0 12.4 14.1 9.9 11.2 12.8 12.4

Holotype.

PEM R24372, adult male, collected by a stream on Mount Inago (–15.1534; 37.4309, 1280 m a.s.l.), Nampula Province, Mozambique by W. Conradie, G. Bittencourt-Silva, A. Raimundo-Miguel and K.A. Tolley on 8 December 2018.

Paratypes.

6 specimens: PEM R24362, gravid female, collected near a stream on Mount Inago (–15.1527; 37.4322, 1274 m a.s.l.), Nampula Province, Mozambique by W. Conradie, A. Raimundo-Miguel, G. Bittencourt-Silva and K.A. Tolley on 8 December 2018. PEM R24376, gravid female, collected near a stream on Mount Inago (–15.1536; 37.4296, 1235 m a.s.l.), Nampula Province, Mozambique by W. Conradie, A. Raimundo-Miguel and K.A. Tolley on 11 December 2018. PEM R24373, gravid female, collected from near a stream on Mount Inago (–15.1534; 37.4308, 1281 m a.s.l.), Nampula Province, Mozambique by W. Conradie, K.A. Tolley and G. Bittencourt-Silva on 8 December 2018. PEM R24260, subadult female, collected from a single standing tree within an area of otherwise felled forest, Mount Inago (–15.1531; 37.4269, 1238 m a.s.l.), Nampula Province, Mozambique by W. Conradie, K.A. Tolley and G. Bittencourt-Silva on 19 April 2017. NHMUK 2025.3275, gravid female, collected near a stream on Mount Inago (–15.1534; 37.4301, 1269 m a.s.l.), Nampula Province, Mozambique by W. Conradie, A. Raimundo-Miguel and K.A. Tolley on 10 December 2018. NHMUK 2025.3276, gravid female collected near a stream on Mount Inago (–15.1536; 37.4296, 1239 m a.s.l.), Nampula Province, Mozambique by W. Conradie, A. Raimundo-Miguel and K.A. Tolley on 11 December 2018.

Etymology.

This species is named Nadzikambia evanescens with the specific epithet from the Latin ‘evanescens’ meaning ‘vanishing’. The name is a present participle that can be used as an adjective or a noun in apposition, and the specific epithet is the same for all genders. The etymology is to highlight the rapidly vanishing forest on Mount Inago and the peril that this species is currently under. The forest has already been reduced to a few small patches, and the uncontrolled conversion of forest to agriculture is continuing. The consequence could be the demise of this endemic forest species, if action is not taken to stop the forest destruction.

Diagnosis.

The new species is assigned to the genus Nadzikambia based on several distinctive characteristics, including a short stout hemipenis with no apical rotulae, the absence of gular and ventral crests, a weakly developed dorsal crest, a low casque, and heterogeneous body scales that form rosettes of tubercles on the lower flanks (Tilbury et al. 2006). This assignment is further supported by monophyly observed in both mitochondrial and nuclear genes (Tilbury et al. 2006; Branch and Tolley 2010).

The new species can be distinguished from other species of Nadzikambia by a combination of the following characters: higher average number upper labials (16.3 versus 15.2 in N. mlanjensis and 15.5 in N. franklinae sp. nov., similar to other species), lower average number of lower labials (17.4 versus 18.1 in N. goodallae sp. nov., similar to other species); casque in adult males higher and rounder – similar to N. franklinae sp. nov. (versus flat and extending laterally in N. mlanjensis and N. goodallae sp. nov. and marginally raised and rounded in N. baylissi); scales on posterior and lateral crown of head smooth – similar to N. franklinae sp. nov. and N. baylissi (versus rugose in N. mlanjensis and N. goodallae sp. nov.).

Additionally, the new species occurs in allopatry from all congeneric species, with the closest geographical relative being N. goodallae sp. nov. (approx. 85 km away) and differs genetically from other Nadzikambia species by: 0.4–4.7% 16S, 3.22–12.7% ND2, and 4.2–12.4% ND4 uncorrected net p distances (Table 2).

Holotype description.

Adult male (78.1 mm SVL + 97.8 TL = 158.1 mm total length), with a fully everted hemipenis. The specimen has a single ventral incision in the chest region for tissue sample extraction and a small incision on the anterior ventral side of the tail to sever the retractor muscle.

Head short (HL/SVL = 0.34) and narrow (HW = 12.4 mm), distance from tip of snout to the superior tip of the casque is twice the width of the head (HL/HW = 2.11). The casque is elevated above the nape, elongated, and its posterior apex points backward to a rounded rim. The casque bulges posteriorly, is centrally and anteriorly depressed, and features smooth flattened scales (except along the parietal crest), abutting with a few interspersed smaller granules. The largest scales are located along the midline of the snout, adjacent to the parietal crest, and alongside the lateral and orbital crests, with six scales present between the orbital crests at mid-orbit. A reduced parietal crest is present on the crown, composed of four moderately raised, enlarged, keeled scales that increase in size posteriorly. Anteriorly, the parietal crest splits into two right and two left weakly raised, keeled scales, forming a V-shape. The crown is bordered on both sides by raised tubercles of the lateral and supraorbital crests and at the rear by the casque. The temporal crest is absent. The lateral crest consists of 9/10 (right/left) raised, irregular tubercular scales that arise from the mid-upper rim of the orbit and curve upward around the casque. The supraorbital crest extends from the lateral crest at the upper posterior rim of the orbit, continuing forward over the eye and onto the snout. It is composed of a series of 14/14 raised scales, with the three anterior scales on the snout being much more elevated and elongated than those above the orbit. The canthus rostralis consists of three prominent subconical tubercles. The first scale is significantly higher than the adjacent scales, giving the impression of a small horn. Three rows of scales separate the anterior edge of the canthi from the upper labials on the snout. The orbit is separated from the upper labials by two rows of small granules. Scales around the eye are elongated, longer than wide, with 10 scales above and 11 below the orbit.

The nostril is rhombic, posteriorly directed, and positioned midway between the tip of the snout and the front of the orbit. It is separated from the upper labials by three rows of granules, with the scales in direct contact with the nostril much smaller than the larger ones in contact with the upper labials. The nostril is also separated from the orbit by three rows of scales and from the supraorbital crest by two rows of scales. No enlarged rostral or mental scales are present. The upper labials (17/18) are sub-hexagonal and subequal in size, with the largest scales located from the snout to the posterior rim of the eye; scales at the rictus are smaller and more rounded. The lower labials (18/18) are similarly sub-hexagonal and subequal in size, with the largest scales extending from the snout to the posterior rim of the eye; scales at the rictus are also smaller and more rounded. Scales bordering the lower labials are irregularly shaped and subequal in size to the lower labials. Gular grooves are fine and inconspicuous. Gular scales are round and raised, with the smallest scales located centrally and increasing in size toward the lower labials. The dorsal crest is mostly smooth, except for four slightly enlarged scales anteriorly. A ventral crest is absent.

Body scales are relatively homogeneous and flattened, abutting one another and forming rosettes on the lower flanks. The smallest scales are located on the belly and are more conical in shape, while the largest, squarish scales are found along the flanks and the paravertebral zone. Scales on the limbs are homogeneous and rounded, separated by minute granules, with the largest scales located on the outer surfaces of the forelimb and hindlimb.

Soles of hindfeet and forefeet with closely fit smooth round scales. Scales above the hindfeet and forefeet heterogenous, larger posteriorly getting smaller anteriorly. Scales under digits slightly larger than those on the soles and more elongated. The scales on the digits directly adjacent to the claws are enlarged, followed by a similarly sized scale that is occasionally split into two.

The tail is longer than the body (TL/SVL = 1.25), dorso-ventrally flattened, and tapering distally to a fine tip. The dorsal and lateral scales are squarish and larger than the more rounded ventral scales.

Hemipenis (Fig. 5C). Similar in general structure to N. mlanjensis, differing only in having a more prominent flattened midline mucosal hump (similar to N. franklinae sp. nov.).

Colouration in life (Fig. 6E). Dorsal ground colour light olive-green, overlaid with a diffuse brown suffusion most pronounced on the parietal region, casque, and anterior dorsum. Flanks with faint darker green to brownish mottling forming two distinct light brown triangular vertical bars. Interstitial skin between the flank scales pale green to beige. Dark green lateral band from lateral crest to midbody. Casque and temporal regions brown, contrasting with the lateral surfaces of the head, which are bright green. Labials yellowish-green. Limbs light green. Gular region silvery-white. Tail green proximally, becoming light brown distally. Iris reddish-brown with fine dark reticulation.

Colouration in preservation (Fig. 14). Predominantly dark purplish-black colouration across the body, with faded patches of lighter brown scales. The head is mostly purplish-black, with slightly paler white-purple scales visible on the crown. A few scattered brownish scales are present behind the head and on the flanks. The gular region is dark purplish, with the inner scale skin appearing white. The ventral surface has a narrow, pale white line extending between the limbs. Inner limbs lighter purple scales with white inner scale skin. Sole of feet white. The tail is dark purple.

Paratype variation.

Measurements for the type series of Nadzikambia evanescens sp. nov. are summarised in Table 7. All paratypes are adult females, except PEM R24260 which is a subadult. The size of the females ranges from 54.1–78.8 (67.6) mm SVL and 57.5– 9.9 (77.1) mm TL. The tail is longer than the body, with an SVL/TL ratio of 1.06–1.24 (1.14). While the type series includes only a single adult male, the females, on average, exhibit a shorter tail (mean TL/SVL: 1.14 in females versus 1.25 in the male).

The general scalation of the females is very similar to that of the holotype, differing only in minor details. The cranial crests are not as developed, and the canthus rostralis not as prominent. The parietal crest comprises of 3–4 raised keeled scales. The upper labials number 15–17 (15.8), while the lower labials range from 15–17 (16.4). The lateral crest consists of 9– 2 scales (10.7), the supraorbital crest has 11–16 scales (13.5), and the dorsal crest includes 4–9 scales (5.8). The body scalation on the flanks varies from closely fitted scales to scales separated by smaller granules dorsally.

In life, the paratype females displays a lime green colouration on the body, legs, gular, and lower surfaces of the head. The belly, inner surfaces of the limbs, and soles of the feet are a light white, with a prominent white mid-ventral line visible extending onto the ventral tail. The flank bars are absent, except for faint paler white blotches. The tail maintains a consistent green colouration anteriorly, withe red-orange bars posteriorly to the tail tip. The scales covering the eyes are lime green, blending seamlessly with the body, while the large scales on the crown of the head have a distinct blue-grey to light brown colouration. The vertebral crest scales are yellow. In preservative, the paratype female’s head and body become very dark, almost purple-black, with all normal colouration lost except for the thin white mid-ventral line.

Natural History.

Four of the females (PEM R24362, PEM R24376, PEM R24373, NHMUK 2025.3276) collected in November were gravid. Clutch sizes comprised nine eggs, with oviductal eggs measuring 12.3–15.1 (13.6 ± 0.8) mm in length and 6.1–7.8 (6.8 ± 0.4) mm in width.

Habitat.

All specimens were collected in an evergreen mid-elevation wet forest between 1235–1281 m a.s.l. They were found at night perched at heights of 2.5–8 m above the ground. The habitat consists of a closed-canopy forest, with occasional small gaps along stream gullies.

Distribution.

Occurs in small, fragmented and isolated mid-elevation wet forest patches at high elevation (ca. 1300 m a.s.l.) on Mount Inago in northern Mozambique (Figs 1, 15).

Figure 15. 

Detailed map of Mount Inago showing the extent of forest as of 2009 (yellow polygons) and as of 2023 (green polygons). Top map shows the Google Earth imagery as of 2023, whereas the bottom map shows the imagery as of 2006. Map data 2025 © Google.

Conservation.

The area is heavily impacted by continuing small scale commercial agriculture and subsistence farming for crops such as maize and potato. The forest destruction has been continuous over the last several decades. Historical satellite images from Google Earth shows that as of 2009 the forest occurred in four main patches at high elevations, for a total of approximately 14.1 km2 (Fig. 15). It is not known how widespread the forest was prior to the available satellite imagery but the natural habitat at Mount Inago does consists of a matrix of forest and grassy savanna so it is possible that forest has been limited on the mountain historically. Since 2009, most of the forest has been destroyed by slash and burn and subsequently used for agriculture (Fig. 16). At present, the Google Earth imagery shows approximately 2.3 km2 remains. In just 15 years, there has been an 84% loss in forest extent. The present-day estimate of the Extent of Occurrence (EOO: convex polygon surrounding the forest edges but upscaled to equal the AOO as per the IUCN guidelines) is 16 km2 and the Area of Occupancy (AOO) mapped as the total summed area of the number of 2x2 km grid cells assumed to be occupied (IUCN Standards and Petitions Committee 2022 but upscaled to match the AOO as per the IUCN guidelines) is 16 km2. The population can be considered severely fragmented with no habitat patch holding > 50% of the entire population, and there is an ongoing decline in forest extent.

Figure 16. 

Intact forest habitat (top), and areas of forest destroyed by slash and burn (middle, bottom) on Mount Inago.

Nadzikambia nubila sp. nov.

Nadzikambia aff. baylissiBayliss et al. (2024: table SI1)

Chiperone sylvan chameleon

Holotype.

PEM R24249, adult female, collected by a stream on Mount Chiperone (–16.5070; 35.7258, 1045 m a.s.l.), Zambézia Province, Mozambique by W. Conradie, G. Bittencourt-Silva, S. Loader and K.A. Tolley on 7 April 2017.

Paratypes.

(4 specimens). PEM R24245, adult female, collected by a stream on Mount Chiperone (–16.5072; 35.7258, 1017 m a.s.l.), Zambézia Province, Mozambique by W. Conradie, G. Bittencourt-Silva, S. Loader, and K.A. Tolley on 5 April 2017. PEM R24250, gravid female, collected by a stream on Mount Chiperone (–16.5080; 35.7248, 1021 m a.s.l.), Zambézia Province, Mozambique by W. Conradie, G. Bittencourt-Silva, S. Loader and K.A. Tolley on 8 April 2017. NHMUK 2025.3277, gravid female, collected near a stream on Mount Chiperone (–16.5066; 35.7260, 1053 m a.s.l.), Zambézia Province, Mozambique by W. Conradie, G. Bittencourt-Silva, S. Loader and K.A. Tolley on 7 April 2017. NHMUK 2025.3278, adult female, collected by a stream on Mount Chiperone (–16.508; 35.7248, 1020 m a.s.l.), Zambézia Province, Mozambique by W. Conradie, G. Bittencourt-Silva, S. Loader and K.A. Tolley on 7 April 2017.

Etymology.

This species is named after the “Ciperoni” – the term used locally for the weather that brings heavy clouds and orographic rainfall to the area. The cloud sustains the mid-elevation wet forest on this mountain. The epithet ‘nubila’ is derived from the Latin ‘nubilus’ meaning “cloudy,” and is modified to the feminine form to agree with the feminine gender of the genus Nadzikambia.

Diagnosis.

The new species is assigned to the genus Nadzikambia based on several distinctive characteristics, including the absence of gular and ventral crests, a weakly developed dorsal crest, a low casque, and heterogeneous body scales that form rosettes of tubercles on the lower flanks (Tilbury et al. 2006). This assignment is further supported by monophyly observed in both mitochondrial and nuclear genes (Tilbury et al. 2006; Branch and Tolley 2010).

Due to the lack of males in the type series this species cannot be compared to the male holotypes of other species. The new species can be distinguished from other species of Nadzikambia by a combination of the following characters: higher average number upper labials (16.6 versus 15.2 in N. mlanjensis and 15.5 in N. franklinae sp. nov., similar to other species), and lower average number of lower labials (17.4 versus 18.1 in N. goodallae sp. nov., similar to other species).

Additionally, the new species occurs in allopatry from all congeneric species, with the closest geographical relative being N. mlanjensis (approx. 65 km away) and differs genetically from other Nadzikambia species by: 0.7–4.7% 16S, 1.7–12.7% ND2, and 4.7–11.5% ND4 uncorrected net p distances (Table 2).

Holotype description.

Adult female male (64.7 mm SVL + 78.0 TL = 142.7 mm total length). The specimen has a single ventral incision in the chest region for tissue sample extraction.

Head short (HL/SVL = 0.29) and narrow (HW = 8.6 mm), distance from tip of snout to the superior edge of the casque is twice the width of the head (HL/HW = 2.21). The casque is slightly elevated above the nape, elongated, and its posterior apex points backward to a rounded rim. The crown of the head is flattened both anteriorly and posteriorly. It is depressed centrally and laterally relative to the parietal crest. The dorsal surface bears flattened, smooth scales, except along the parietal crest itself, and these abut one another with a few smaller interspersed granules. The largest scales occur along the midline of the snout, adjacent to the parietal crest, and alongside the lateral and supraorbital crests. Six scales are present between the supraorbital crests at mid-orbit. A reduced parietal crest is present on the crown, composed of three moderately raised, enlarged, smooth scales that increase in size posteriorly. The crown is bordered on both sides by raised tubercles of the lateral and supraorbital crests and at the rear by the casque. The temporal crest is absent. The lateral crest consists of 8/9 (right/left) raised, irregular tubercular scales that arise from the mid-upper rim of the orbit and curve upward around the casque. The supraorbital crest extends from the lateral crest at the upper posterior rim of the orbit, continuing forward over the eye and onto the snout. It is composed of a series of 14/13 raised scales. The canthus rostralis not elevated to form any protrusions or ‘horns’. Three to four rows of smaller scales separate the canthi from the upper labials on the snout. The orbit is separated from the upper labials by one to two rows of small granules. Scales around the eye are elongated, longer than wide, with nine scales above and 10 below the orbit.

The nostril is rhombic, posteriorly directed, and positioned midway between the tip of the snout and the front of the orbit. It is separated from the upper labials by three rows of granules, with the scales in direct contact with the nostril much smaller than the larger ones in contact with the upper labials. The nostril is also separated from the orbit by three rows of scales and from the supraorbital crest by two rows of scales. No enlarged rostral or mental scales are present. The upper labials (17/17) are sub-hexagonal and subequal in size, with the largest scales located from the snout to the posterior rim of the eye; scales at the rictus are smaller and more rounded. The lower labials (19/18) are similarly sub-hexagonal and subequal in size, with the largest scales extending from the snout to the posterior rim of the eye; scales at the rictus are also smaller and more rounded. Scales bordering the lower labials are irregularly shaped and subequal in size to the lower labials. Gular grooves are fine and inconspicuous. Gular scales are round and raised, with the smallest scales located centrally and increasing in size toward the lower labials. The dorsal crest is mostly absent, except for five slightly raised scales anteriorly. A ventral crest is absent.

Body scales are relatively homogeneous and flattened, abutting one another and forming rosettes on the lower flanks. No smaller granules between scales on the flanks. The smallest scales are located on the belly and are more conical in shape, while the largest, squarish scales are found along the flanks and the paravertebral zone. Scales on the limbs are homogeneous and rounded, with the largest scales located on the outer surfaces of the hindlimbs and forelimbs.

Soles of hindfeet and forefeet with closely fit smooth round scales. Scales above digits heterogenous, larger posteriorly getting smaller anteriorly. Scales under digits slightly larger than those on the soles and more elongated. The scales on the digits directly adjacent to the claws are enlarged, followed by a similarly sized scale that is occasionally split into two.

The tail is longer than the body (TL/SVL = 1.21), dorso-ventrally flattened, and tapering distally to a fine tip. The dorsal and lateral scales are squarish and larger than the more rounded ventral scales.

Colouration in life (Fig. 6E). Green body with intricate brown blotches. The head is a pale greenish laterally, with light orange-brown labials. The scales on the crown of the head are red-brown. The eyes are surrounded by lighter, greenish-blue scales. The flanks of the body feature a mixture of green and orange-brown scales, transitioning into irregular darker brown patches. The limbs are green-brown, with a slightly paler tone along the ventral surfaces and inner surface of limbs. The chest region blueish-grey. The ventral surface is predominantly pale greenish-yellow, with a white mid-ventral line. The tail exhibits a gradient of green-brown tones, with faint banding patterns and a slight orange tinge near the base.

Colouration in preservation (Fig. 17). Dark purplish-­black colouration across the whole body. The head is purplish-black. The gular region is dark purplish, with the inner scale skin appearing white. The ventral surface has a narrow, pale white line extending between the limbs. Inner surface of limbs lighter purple than outer surface, with white inner skin. Sole of feet white. The tail is dark purple.

Figure 17. 

Holotype (PEM R24249) female of Nadzikambia nubila sp. nov. A lateral full body, B lateral close-up of head, C dorsal close-up of head, D ventral close-up of head. Scale bar = 10 mm.

Paratype variation.

Measurements for the type series of Nadzikambia nubila sp. nov. are presented in Table 8. All paratypes are adult females. The size of the females (including holotype) ranges from 59.6–64.7 (62.0) mm SVL and 71.2–78.0 (72.9) mm TL. The tail is longer than the body, with an SVL/TL ratio of 1.12–1.28 (1.19).

Table 8.

Measurements (mm) for the type series of Nadzikambia nubila sp. nov. from Mount Chiperone, Mozambique (PEM – Port Elizabeth Museum; NHMUK – Natural History Museum of London). See Materials and Methods for description of measurements.

Catalogue No PEM R24249 NHMUK 2025.3277 NHMUK 2025.3278 PEM R24245 PEM R24250
Type status Holotype Paratype Paratype Paratype Paratype
Sex Female Female Female Female Female
SVL 64.7 59.6 64.2 61.0 60.8
TL 78.0 76.3 71.8 72.0 71.2
ToL 142.7 135.8 136.0 133.1 132.0
TL/SVL 1.21 1.28 1.12 1.18 1.17
HL 19.0 18.1 19.4 18.4 18.1
HW 8.6 8.2 8.8 8.8 7.8
HH 11.9 11.4 12.7 11.2 11.1
ML 11.9 10.7 10.9 10.7 11.0
CE 8.0 7.2 8.2 7.7 7.8
SL 5.7 5.9 6.2 6.0 5.8
ED 6.5 5.9 6.5 5.7 5.9
CC 5.1 4.4 4.8 5.3 4.6
IL 37.7 37.1 41.9 34.9 38.6
FLL 12.1 11.7 13.0 11.1 11.8
HLL 11.2 10.7 12.3 11.3 10.6

The general scalation of the paratypes are very similar to that of the holotype, differing only in minor details. The upper labials number 16–17 (16.6), while the lower labials range from 16–20 (17.8). The lateral crest consists of 9–12 scales (10.0), the supraorbital crest has 12–16 scales (14.4), and the dorsal crest includes 4–6 scales (5.2).

Colouration in life and preservative of the paratypes are in agreement with the holotype. Male colouration currently unknown.

Natural History.

Three of the females (PEM R24250, NHMUK 2025.3277, NHMUK 2025.3278) collected in early April were gravid. Clutch sizes ranged from 4 to 5 eggs (4.3), with oviductal eggs measuring 12.9–14.1 (13.5 ± 0.4) mm in length and 6.4–7.1 (6.7 ± 0.3) mm in width.

Habitat.

All specimens were collected in an evergreen mid-elevation wet forest between 1017–1053 m a.s.l. They were found at night perched in tree branches at heights of 4–7 m above the ground but are likely to also occur higher in the canopy. The habitat consists of a closed-canopy forest reaching tens of meters high, with occasional small gaps in the canopy along stream gullies.

Distribution.

Occurs only in the mid-elevation wet forest of Mount Chiperone in northern Mozambique (Figs 1, 18).

Figure 18. 

Detailed map of Mount Chiperone with polygons showing the extent of forest as of 2025 (green) and 2006 (yellow). Top map shows the Google Earth imagery as of 2025, whereas the bottom map shows the imagery as of 2006. Map data 2025 © Google.

Conservation.

Mount Chiperone is known to the local community as “the cloud maker” as the mountain catches atmospheric moisture, creating cloud cover and forming the rain that not only supplies the forest, but the surrounding landscape. The mountain is also considered holy to most of the communities surrounding it, which results in a measure of community protection in terms of over-­exploitation. Rainforest originally occurred above ca. 1000 m elevation below which was Brachstegia woodland (savanna). Forest extent as of 2024 is about 7 km2 from ca. 15 km2 in 2006 (Fig. 18) for a 53% decrease in forest cover. Most of the forest loss appears to be on the lower south-west slopes of the mountain and while some of this clearly shows the scars of agricultural use, other areas show only what appears to be attrition of forest on the edges, being replaced by scrubby vegetation (Fig. 18). Similarly, there appears to be a recent change in vegetation at the summit where Google Earth satellite imagery between 2006–2016 shows trees covering the summit, but beginning in 2018 and progressing to present, the area appears to be progressively devoid of vegetation, having shifted to what appears to be open granite patches. It is unclear if this change was due to slash and burn practices which seems unlikely at such high elevation, leaving the lower slopes unaffected. It is possible that orographic rainfall that would normally have provided the moisture needed to maintain forest has been reduced, and the forest extent is being impacted. Thus, while the mountain shows long-term impacts from agriculture along the lower slopes, the forest at higher elevations is nevertheless contracting, and this may be due to climatic changes.

The Area of Occupancy (AOO) mapped as the total summed area of the number of 2x2 km grid cells assumed to be occupied is 16 km2 and EOO (the convex polygon surrounding both remaining forest patches but upscaled to match the AOO as per the IUCN guidelines) is estimated at 16 km2.

Discussion

Total evidence based on multiple species properties and species delimitation approaches supports the hypothesis of long-term isolation of Nadzikambia populations on each of the inselbergs. Vicariance of forest since the Miocene has led to allopatric speciation, with divergences among the populations on each mountain showing evidence of candidate species. These species are divergent for both mitochondrial and nuclear genes and have been geographically isolated for some millions of years. Sylvan chameleons are not vagile and have strong philopatry for the forests in which they occur. Given that the forests are separated by a minimum of 45 km, absence of immigration between forest patches is the most likely mechanism for allopatric speciation. As with some other forest-restricted reptiles (e.g., Branch et al. 2014; Petford et al. 2026), the species are morphologically conservative, retaining an ancestral body form with adaptations for forest-living. Despite this, there are some minor morphological features that differ among taxa although our samples sizes were limited. On the balance of evidence, we therefore describe four new species of Nadzikambia, one from each of the mountains surveyed (Mounts Chiperone, Inago, Namuli, Ribáuè). Their description increases the species number in the genus from two to six, and suggests that other mountains in the SEAMA, not yet adequately surveyed for these cryptic chameleons, may also harbour endemic Nadzikambia.

The phylogenetic analysis showed there are two clades of Nadzikambia that are deeply divergent (Mulanje+Mabu+Chiperone+Ribáuè) and (Inago+Namuli). Chameleons in the genus Rhampholeon from the SEAMA dated to have diverged in the mid-Miocene (ca. 11– 9 Mya) were have sequence divergences similar to the two main clades of Nadzikambia (ca. 11–13 % for ND2 and ND4), suggesting a comparable time frame of divergence for the two main Nadzikambia clades. Species level divergences would be younger and using similar sequence divergences (ca. 4–5 % for ND2) for Rhampholeon from SEAMA sky islands as comparison (Branch et al. 2014), a rough estimate would be for Nadzikambia species level divergence to have occurred within the last 10 million years. Despite similarities between these two genera of chameleons, dated phylogenies of other SEAMA taxonomic groups show both older and younger species level divergence. For example, the small-bodied amphibian, Nothophryne, is a habitat specialist and occurs only on the wet surfaces of the high granite domes of the SEAMA sky islands. Estimates of diversification between populations on the inselbergs surveyed suggest divergences are much older, between 13–18 Mya (Bittencourt-Silva et al. 2016). In contrast, other taxa have been found to be younger with species level diversification in both freshwater crabs (Potamonautes; Daniels et al. 2020) and bats (Rhinolophus; Taylor et al. 2012) occurring around the Plio-Pleistocene transition (<2.7 Mya). It is likely that these younger taxa are more vagile than forest chameleons (or small, specialist amphibians) and gene flow persisted via corridors or perhaps long-distance dispersal events, despite the contraction of the primary forest habitat.

Within the two clades of Nadzikambia, the species from Mounts Inago and Namuli are supported as sister taxa (N. evanescens and N. franklinae), as are the species from Mounts Chiperone and Mabu (N. nubila and N. baylissi). Given the level of sequence divergence among these two sets of sister taxa (ca. 2–5% for mitochondrial ND2 and ND4), with similar sequence divergence values estimated within Rhampholeon chameleons from the SEAMA. These Rhampholeon divergences have been estimated ca. 2.4–8.9 Mya placing the timeframe for divergence of sky island populations near the transition between the late Miocene and the Early Pliocene (ca. 5.5 Mya). The comparable sequence divergence values among Nadzikambia allow for a similar time frame for their isolation (from the same inselbergs) to be hypothesised. Given both genera show an analogous pattern, it can be surmised that the Late Miocene Cooling phase that promoted of aridification in the sub-tropics and caused contraction of forests concomitant with expansion of open habitats (Couvreur et al. 2021), driving the vicariance between inselbergs, resulting in allopatric speciation. Both Rhampholeon and Nadzikambia species are forest dependent and their subsequent isolation in the montane forests, despite some inselbergs being separated by only 45–85 km of savanna, is presumed to maintain a strong ecological barrier to immigration and gene flow.

Although there are comparable species level divergence estimates among SEAMA chameleons, the overall geographic pattern of diversification is not consistent among broader taxonomic groups investigated to date and ranges from a few million to nearly 20 million years (e.g., Daniels and Bayliss 2012; Daniels et al. 2020; Bittencourt-Silva et al. 2026). Furthermore, the more ancient diversification patterns are not completely consistent among the two genera of SEAMA chameleons. While Nadzikambia has two distinct clades, diverging most likely in the mid-Miocene, within SEAMA Rhampholeon, most species are in a single clade, with R. bruessoworum from Mount Inago showing the earliest divergence from all other species during the mid-Miocene (Branch et al. 2014). Confounding these patterns is the possibility of missing taxa from each of the phylogenies. For example, analyses of Rhampholeon includes R. chapmanorum from Malawi Hills (also part of the SEAMA), but Nadzikambia has not yet been recorded from that forest. Similarly, while Nadzikambia from Mount Ribáuè have been included here, Rhampholeon from Mount Ribáuè have not yet been included in any phylogeny. Furthermore, there are multiple additional sky islands which have not yet been comprehensively surveyed (e.g., Mount Morrumbala), and others with observations of Rhampholeon that are not yet included in any analyses (e.g., Mounts Pico Muli, Nallume, Namaroana, Socone: Bittencourt-Silva et al. 2020; Bayliss et al. 2024; Foquet et al. 2024). Finally, it is possible that many other populations have become locally extinct since the late Miocene as progressive aridification of the region contracted montane forest, particularly for some of the smaller and/or lower elevation mountains. Thus, to fully assess the evolutionary patterns of SEAMA chameleons, it will be essential to carry out additional, targeted surveys of these sky islands.

Acknowledgements

We are extremely grateful to the National Geographic Society (CRE 9281-13 and CRE 9934-16), the Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (S16-375-MOZ), and the National Research Foundation of South Africa (Grant #92776) for funding the field surveys, and to BirdLife International for supporting the CEFP grant logistics. We also thank the following for assisting with field work as well as their support and companionship under some rather tough field conditions: Gabriela Bittencourt-Silva, Hanlie Engelbrecht, Simon Loader, Dave Langerman, Cristóvão Nanvonamuquitxo, Hermenegildo Matemele, Avelino Raimundo Miguel, Michele Menegon, Mike Scott and Erica Tovela. Thanks to Khangela Safaris for efficiently and expertly setting up and running the field camps and Harith Farooq for logistical support. We are grateful to Tim Brammer for providing information on the recent conditions at Mount Mulanje, with the Mulanje photos being courtesy of Hendrik Pretorius and Maggie O’Toole. Thanks to Aaron Bauer for his excellent advice on the construction of the Latin names, Javier Lobón-Rovira for assistance with forest mapping, two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments to improve the manuscript, the Museu De História Natural de Maputo for logistical assistance with permitting and permissions, and the Natural History Museum, London for housing a subset of specimens. This work was carried out under written permission from the provinces of Niassa, Nampula and Zambézia, and by the designated authority at the Natural History Museum of Maputo who endorsed the project and provided research and collection permits (nos. 129/­DPAN/­2014, 507/­DPAZ/­SPFFB/­420/2014, 315/MNH/E27/2014, 08/­2018, 282/­DPTADERZ/GD/SPFFB/420, 730/DPTADER/NPL/REP, 1090/­DPTADER/­SPFFB/600 and CITES Institutional labels no. 05/2018, 001160).

Unfortunately, the inspiring women of science that are namesakes for our chosen scientific names for the Mount Namuli (N. franklinae spec. nov.) and Mount Ribáuè (N. goodallae spec. nov.) sylvan chameleons did not outlast our time frame for publication of this paper, but we are nevertheless honoured to present this tribute to them.

References

  • Aljanabi SM, Martinez I (1997) Universal and rapid salt-extraction of high quality genomic DNA for PCR based techniques. Nucleic Acids Research 25: 4692–4693. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/25.22.4692
  • Barends JM, Tolley KA (2024) Big cities, big bodies: Urbanisation correlates with large body sizes and enhanced body condition in African dwarf chameleons (genus: Bradypodion). African Zoology 59: 145– 153. https://doi.org/10.1080/15627020.2024.2402256
  • Bayliss J, Bittencourt-Silva GB, Branch WR, Bruessow C, Collins S, Congdon C, Conradie W, Curran M, Daniels S, Darbyshire I, Farooq H, Fishpool L, Grantham G, Magombo Z, Matimele H, Monadjem A, Monteiro J, Osborne J, Saunders J, Smith P, Spottiswoode CN, Taylor P, Timberlake J, Tolley KA, Tovela E, Platts PJ (2024) The South East Africa Montane Archipelago (SEAMA) – A biogeographical appraisal of a threatened ecoregion. Scientific Reports 14: 5971. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-54671-z
  • Bayliss J, Monteiro J, Fishpool L, Congdon C, Bampton I, Bruessow C, Matimele H, Banze A, Timberlake JR (2010) Biodiversity and Conservation of Mount Inago, Mozambique. Report for Darwin Initiative Award 15/036. Mulanje Mountain Conservation Trust, Malawi, 32 pp.
  • Bayliss J, Timberlake J, Branch W, Bruessow C, Collins S, Congdon C, Curran M, De Sousa C, Dowsett R, Dowsett-Lemaire F, Fishpool L (2014) The discovery, biodiversity and conservation of Mabu forest—The largest medium-altitude rainforest in southern Africa. Oryx 48: 177–185. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605313000720
  • Bittencourt-Silva GB, Bayliss J, Conradie W (2020) First herpetological surveys of Mount Lico and Mount Socone, Mozambique. Amphibian and Reptile Conservation 14: 198–217.
  • Bittencourt-Silva GB, Conradie W, Siu-Ting K, Tolley KA, Channing A, Cunningham M, Farooq HM, Menegon M, Loader SP (2016) The phylogenetic position and diversity of the enigmatic mongrel frog Nothophryne Poynton, 1963 (Amphibia, Anura). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 99: 89–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2016.03.021
  • Branch WR, Bayliss J, Tolley KA (2014) Pygmy chameleons of the Rhampholeon platyceps complex (Squamata: Chamaeleonidae): Description of four new species from isolated ‘sky islands’ of northern Mozambique. Zootaxa 3817: 1–36. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3814.1
  • Broadley DG (1965) A new chameleon from Malawi. Arnoldia 1: 1–3.
  • Brooks T, Hoffmann M, Burgess N, Plumptre A, Williams S, Gereau RE, Mittermeier RA, Stuart S (2004) Eastern Afromontane. In: Mittermeier RA, Robles-Gil P, Hoffmann M, Pilgrim JD, Brooks TM, Mittermeier CG, Lamoruex J, da Fonseca GAB (Eds) Hotspots Revisited: Earth’s Biologically Richest and Most Endangered Ecoregions, 2nd Edition. Cemex, Mexico City, 241–242.
  • Burgess ND, Butynski TM, Cordeiro NJ, Doggart NH, Fjeldså J, Howell KM, Kilahama FB, Loader SP, Lovett JC, Mbilinyi B, Menegon M (2007) The biological importance of the Eastern Arc Mountains of Tanzania and Kenya. Biological Conservation 134: 209–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2006.08.015
  • Conradie W, Bittencourt-Silva GB, Engelbrecht HM, Loader SP, Menegon M, Nanvonamuquitxo C, Scott M, Tolley KA (2016) Exploration of the hidden world of Mozambique’s sky island forests: New discoveries of reptiles and amphibians. Zoosystematics and Evolution 92: 163–180. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.92.9948
  • Couvreur TLP, Dauby G, Blach-Overgaard A, Deblauwe V, Dessein S, Droissart V, Hardy OJ, Harris DJ, Janssens SB, Ley AC, Mackinder BA, Sonké B, Sosef MSM, Stévart T, Svenning J.-C, Wieringa JJ, Faye AC, Missoup D, Tolley KA, Nicolas V, Ntie S, Fluteau F, Robin C, Guillocheau F, Barboni D, Sepulchre P (2021) Tectonics, climate and the diversification of the tropical African terrestrial flora and fauna. Biological Reviews 96: 15–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12644
  • Cowling RM, MacDonald IAW, Simmons MT (1996) The Cape Peninsula, South Africa: Physiographical, biological and historical background to an extraordinary hot-spot of biodiversity. Biodiversity & Conservation 5: 527–550. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00137608
  • Cowling RM, Procheş Ş, Partridge TC (2009) Explaining the uniqueness of the Cape flora: Incorporating geomorphic evolution as a factor for explaining its diversification. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 51: 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2008.05.034
  • da Silva JM, Tolley KA (2013) Ecomorphological variation and sexual dimorphism in a recent radiation of dwarf chameleons (Bradypo­dion). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 109: 113–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/bij.12045
  • Daniels SR, Bayliss J (2012) Neglected refugia of biodiversity: Mountainous regions in Mozambique and Malawi yield two novel freshwater crab species (Potamonautidae: Potamonautes). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 164: 498–509. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.2011.00773.x
  • Daniels SR, Bittencourt-Silva GB, Muianga V, Bayliss J (2020) Phylogenetics of the freshwater crab (Potamonautes MacLeay, 1838) fauna from ‘sky islands’ in Mozambique with the description of a new species (Brachyura: Potamoidea: Potamonautidae). European Journal of Taxonomy 716: 1–23. https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2020.716
  • Darriba D, Taboada GL, Doallo R, Posada D (2012) jModelTest 2: More models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nature Methods 9: 772. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2109
  • de Queiroz K (2005) A unified concept of species and its consequences for the future of taxonomy. Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences 56 (Supplement 1): 196–215.
  • Dowsett-Lemaire F (1988) The forest vegetation of Mt Mulanje (Malawi): A floristic and chorological study along an altitudinal gradient (650–1950 m). Bulletin du Jardin botanique national de Belgique/Bulletin van de Nationale Plantentuin van België 58: 77–107. https://doi.org/10.2307/3668402
  • Farooq H, Nanvonamuquitxo C, Nassongole B, Conradie W, Bills R, Soares A, Antonelli A (2022) Shedding light on a biodiversity dark spot: Survey of amphibians and reptiles of Pemba region in northern Mo­zambique. Herpetological Conservation and Biology 17: 423–432.
  • Fjeldså J, Lovett JC (1997) Geographical patterns of old and young species in African forest biota: The significance of specific montane areas as evolutionary centres. Biodiversity & Conservation 6: 325–346. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018356506390
  • Foquet R, Brammer T, Manjor P, Macia F, De Beenhouwer M (2024) Herpetological surveys of poorly studied sites in the South East African Montane Archipelago. 4Forests Assessment Report 1. 4Forests, Belgium, 40 pp. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.26798.63041
  • Forstner MR, Davis SK, Arévalo E (1995) Support for the hypothesis of anguimorph ancestry for the suborder Serpentes from phylogenetic analysis of mitochondrial DNA sequences. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 4: 93–102. https://doi.org/10.1006/mpev.1995.1010
  • Franklin RE, Gosling RG (1953) Evidence for 2-chain helix in crystalline structure of sodium deoxyribonucleate. Nature 172: 156–157. https://doi.org/10.1038/172156a0
  • Gonwouo NL, LeBreton M, Chirio L, Ineich I, Tchamba NM, Ngassam P, Dzikouk G, Diffo JL (2007) Biodiversity and conservation of the reptiles of the Mount Cameroon Area. African Journal of Herpe­tology 56: 149–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/21564574.2007.9635560
  • Groth JG, Barrowclough GF (1999) Basal divergences in birds and the phylogenetic utility of the nuclear RAG-1 gene. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 12: 115–123. https://doi.org/10.1006/mpev.1998.0603
  • Hansen MC, Potapov PV, Moore R, Hancher M, Turubanova SA. Tyukavina A, Thau D, Stehman SV, Goetz SJ, Loveland TR, Kommareddy A, Egorov A, Chini L, Justice CO, Townshend JRG (2013) High-Resolution Global Maps of 21st-Century Forest Cover Change. Science 342: 850–853. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1244693
  • Herrmann H-W, Böhme W, Herrmann PA, Plath M, Schmitz A, Solbach M (2005) African biodiversity hotspots: The amphibians of Mount Nlonako, Cameroon. Salamandra 41: 61–81.
  • Hughes DF, Kusamba C, Behangana M, Greenbaum E (2017) Integrative taxonomy of the Central African forest chameleon, Kinyongia adolfifriderici (Sauria: Chamaeleonidae), reveals underestimated species diversity in the Albertine Rift. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 181: 400–438. https://doi.org/10.1093/zoolinnean/zlx005
  • Hughes DF, Tolley KA, Behangana M, Lukwago W, Menegon M, Dehling JM, Stipala J, Tilbury CR, Khan AM, Kusamba C, Greenbaum E (2018) Cryptic diversity in Rhampholeon boulengeri (Sauria: Chamaeleonidae), a pygmy chameleon from the Albertine Rift biodiversity hotspot. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 122: 125–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2017.11.015
  • Kapli P, Lutteropp S, Zhang J, Kobert K, Pavlidis P, Stamatakis A, Flouri T (2017) Multi-rate Poisson tree processes for single-locus species delimitation under maximum likelihood and Markov chain Monte Carlo. Bioinformatics 33: 1630–1638. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btx025
  • Klaver CJJ, Böhme W (1986) Phylogeny and classification of the Chamaeleonidae (Sauria) with special reference to hemipenis morphology. Bonner zoologische Monographien 22: 1–64.
  • Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K (2018) MEGA X: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Molecular Biology and Evolution 35: 1547–1549. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msy096
  • Last JT (1887) On the Society’s Expedition to the Namuli Hills, East Africa. Proceedings of the Royal Geographical Society and Monthly Record of Geography 9: 467–478.
  • Liu Y, Wang Y, Willett SD, Zimmermann NE, Pellissier L (2024) Escarpment evolution drives the diversification of the Madagascar flora. Science 383: 653–658. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adi0833
  • Macey JR, Larson A, Ananjeva NB, Fang ZL, Papenfuss TJ (1997a) Two novel gene orders and the role of light-strand replication in rearrangement of the vertebrate mitochondrial genome. Molecular Biology and Evolution 14: 91–104. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025706
  • Macey JR, Larson A, Ananjeva NB, Papenfuss TJ (1997b) Evolutionary shifts in three major structural features of the mitochondrial genome among iguanian lizards. Journal of Molecular Evolution 44: 660–674. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00006190
  • Matthee CA, Tilbury CR, Townsend T (2004) A phylogenetic review of the African leaf chameleons: Genus Rhampholeon (Chamaeleonidae): The role of vicariance and climate change in speciation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 271: 1967–1975. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2004.2806
  • Meier R, Shiyang K, Vaidya G, Ng P (2006) DNA barcoding and taxonomy in Diptera: A tale of high intraspecific variability and low identification success. Systematic Biology 55: 715–728. https://doi.org/10.1080/10635150600969864
  • Miller MA, Pfeiffer W, Schwartz T (2010) Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. In: Proceedings of the Gateway Computing Environments workshop (GCE), San Diego Supercomputer Center, 14 Nov. 2010, New Orleans, LA, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/GCE.2010.5676129
  • Palumbi S (1996) Nucleic acids II: The polymerase chain reaction. In: Hillis DM, Moritz C, Mable BK (Eds) Molecular Systematics, 2nd Edition. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, 205–247.
  • Petford MA, Herrel A, Alexander GJ, Tolley KA (2024) Differences between urban and natural populations of dwarf chameleons (Bradypodion damaranum): A case of urban warfare. Urban Ecosystems 27: 577–589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-023-01474-1
  • Petford MA, Herrel A, Tolley KA (2026) The evolution of ecomorphological convergence in dwarf chameleons (Bradypodion). American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/739749
  • Plumptre AJ, Davenport TR, Behangana M, Kityo R, Eilu G, Ssegawa P, Ewango C, Meirte D, Kahindo C, Herremans M, Peterhans JK (2007) The biodiversity of the Albertine Rift. Biological Conservation 134: 178–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2006.08.021
  • Rambaut A, Drummond AJ, Xie D, Baele G, Suchard MA (2018) Posterior summarisation in Bayesian phylogenetics using Tracer 1.7. Systematic Biology 67: 901–904. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syy032
  • Rebelo AD, Altwegg R, Katz EM, Tolley KA (2022) Out on a limb: Female chameleons (Bradypodion pumilum) position themselves to minimise detection, while males maximise mating opportunity. African Journal of Herpetology 71: 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/21564574.2021.1998233
  • Roux C, Fraïsse C, Romiguier J, Anciaux Y, Galtier N, Bierne N (2016) Shedding light on the grey zone of speciation along a continuum of genomic divergence. PLoS Biology 14: e2000234. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2000234
  • Rovero F, Menegon M, Fjeldså J, Collett L, Doggart N, Leonard C, Norton G, Owen N, Perkin A, Spitale D, Ahrends A (2014) Targeted vertebrate surveys enhance the faunal importance and improve explanatory models within the Eastern Arc Mountains of Kenya and Tanzania. Diversity and Distributions 20: 1438–1449. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12246
  • Samways MJ, Pryke JS, Gaigher R, Deacon C (2024) Eco-evolutionary origins and diversification in a megadiverse hotspot: Arthropods in the Greater Cape Floristic Region. Ecology and Evolution 14: e70195. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.70195
  • Stanton-Jones WK, Tolley KA, Barends JM, Alexander GJ, Tolley KA (2025) Focus on the feeding: A re-evaluation of foraging mode in chameleons. Current Zoology: zoaf065. https://doi.org/10.1093/cz/zoaf065
  • Stephens M, Smith N, Donnelly P (2001) A new statistical method for haplotype reconstruction from population data. American Journal of Human Genetics 68: 978–989. https://doi.org/10.1086/319501
  • Taylor PJ, Stoffberg S, Monadjem A, Schoeman M.C, Bayliss J, Cotterill FP (2012) Four new bat species (Rhinolophus hildebrandtii complex) reflect Plio-Pleistocene divergence of dwarfs and giants across an Afromontane archipelago. PLoS ONE 7: e41744. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0041744
  • Tilbury CR (2018) Chameleons of Africa: An Atlas, Including the Chameleons of Europe, the Middle East and Asia (2nd Ed.). Edition Chimaira, Frankfurt am Main, 643 pp.
  • Tilbury CR, Tolley KA, Branch WR (2006) A review of the systematics of the genus Bradypodion (Sauria: Chamaeleonidae), with the description of two new genera. Zootaxa 1363: 23–38. https://doi.org/10.11646/ZOOTAXA.1363.1.2
  • Tolley KA, Burger M, Tilbury CR (2022b) Convergence and vicariance: Speciation of chameleons in the Cape Fold Mountains, South Africa, and the description of three new species of Bradypodion Fitzinger, 1843. African Journal of Herpetology 71: 14–38.
  • Tolley KA, Burger M, Turner AA, Matthee CA (2006) Biogeographic patterns and phylogeography of dwarf chameleons (Bradypodion) in an African biodiversity hotspot. Molecular Ecology 15: 781–793. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.02836.x
  • Tolley KA, Menegon M (2013) Evolution and biogeography of chameleons. In: Tolley KA, Herrel A (Eds) The Biology of the Chameleons. University of California Press, Oakland, CA, 131–150.
  • Tolley KA, Tilbury CR, da Silva JM, Brown, G, Chapeta Y, Anderson CV (2022a) Clinging to Survival: Critically Endangered Chapman’s Leaf Chameleon (Rhampholeon chapmanorum) persists in shrinking forest patches. Oryx 56: 451–456. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605320000952
  • Tolley KA, Tilbury CR, Measey GJ, Menegon M, Branch WR, Matthee CA (2011) Ancient forest fragmentation or recent radiation? Testing refugial speciation models in an African biodiversity hotspot. Journal of Biogeography 38: 1748–1760. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2011.02529.x
  • Tolley KA, Townsend TM, Vences M (2013) Large-scale phylogeny of chameleons suggests African origins and Eocene diversification. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 280: 20130184. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.0184
  • van Noort S, Gardiner AJ, Tolley KA (2007) New records of Ficus (Moraceae) species emphasize the conservation significance of inselbergs in Mozambique. South African Journal of Botany 73: 642–649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2007.04.063
  • Vanschoenwinkel B, de Paula LF, Snoeks JM, Van der Stocken T, Buschke FT, Porembski S, Silveira FA (2025) The ecological and evolutionary dynamics of inselbergs. Biological Reviews 100: 481–507. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.13150
  • Vences M, Miralles A, Brouillet S, Ducasse J, Fedosov A, Kharchev V, Kostadinov I, Kumari S, Patmanidis S, Scherz MD, Puillandre N (2021) iTaxoTools 0.1: Kickstarting a specimen-based software toolkit for taxonomists. Megataxa 6: 77–92. https://doi.org/10.11646/megataxa.6.2.1
  • Vincent J (1933) The Namuli Mountains, Portuguese East Africa. Geographical Journal 81: 314–327.
  • Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS), Governo de Moçambique & USAID (2021) Red List of Threatened Species, Ecosystems, Identification and Mapping of Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) in Mozambique – Final Report (VOL. I). USAID / SPEED+, Maputo, 96 pp.
  • Wüster W (2025) Shedding the mitochondrial blinkers: A long-overdue challenge for species delimitation in herpetology. Vertebrate Zoology 75: 259–275. https://doi.org/10.3897/vz.75.e161536

Appendix 1

List of additional comparative material, excluding type material of the new species, examined for the study. PEM – Port Elizabeth Museum.

Nadzikambia mlanjensis (12 specimens): PEM R05746, Little Ruo Gorge, Mount Mulanje (–15.9667; 35.68333, 1792 m a.s.l), Malawi. PEM R16293–4, PEM R16315–6, PEM R16294, Lichenya Hut, Mount Mulanje (–15.9744; 35.5506, 1858 m a.s.l), Malawi. PEM R18142–4, Lichenya Hut, Mountain Mulanje (–15.9358; 35.5881, 2347 m a.s.l.), Malawi [same coordinates as used in Branch and Tolley (2018) but don’t agree with locality description). PEM R18445, Lichyena Hut, Mountain Mulanje (–15.9769; 35.5508, 1774 m a.s.l.), Malawi. PEM R18446, Lichyena Hut (Mulanje) (–15.9742; 35.5504, 1777 m a.s.l.), Malawi. PEM R18447, Mimosa Tea Research station, near Mount Mulanje (–16.0986; 35.6272, 630 m a.s.l.), Malawi. PEM R18448, Lichyena Hut, Mountain Mulanje (–15.9711; 35.5509, 1877 m a.s.l.), Malawi.

Nadzikambia baylissi (9 specimens): PEM R18053–6, Forest Camp region, Mountain Mabu (–16.2861; 36.4006, 967 m a.s.l), Mozambique. PEM R21128–32, Mabu Mountain Forest Base Camp (-16.2862 36.4001, 919 m a.s.l.), Mozambique.

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 

Files S1, S2

Author: Tolley KA, Conradie W (2026)

Data type: .docx

Explanation notes: Results from the mPTP species delimitation analysis for Nadzikambia. Shown are the inferred species denoted by clusterings with red shaded branches. Nodes are labelled with posterior probability support values.

This dataset is made available under the Open Database License (http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/1.0). The Open Database License (ODbL) is a license agreement intended to allow users to freely share, modify, and use this dataset while maintaining this same freedom for others, provided that the original source and author(s) are credited.
Download file (237.94 kb)
login to comment