Research Article
Print
Research Article
Spots amongst the stripes! Three new spotted species of ground-dwelling Cyrtodactylus Gray, 1827 (Reptilia: Squamata) from tiger conservation landscapes in peninsular India
expand article infoIshan Agarwal, Tejas Thackeray, Satpal Gangalmale, Satheeshkumar M§, Saunak Pal|, Akshay Khandekar
‡ Thackeray Wildlife Foundation, Mumbai, India
§ Unaffiliated, Shenbagathoppu, India
| University of Newcastle, Newcastle, United Kingdom
Open Access

Abstract

We describe three new species of ground-dwelling gecko of the dry-zone clade of Cyrtodactylus (Geckoella) from peninsular India in an integrative taxonomic framework. All three new species have a spotted dorsal colour pattern; and their small body size and original tail shorter than body, besides the lack of femoral or precloacal pores in males, easily differentiate them from all other Cyrto­dactylus apart from other Cyrtodactylus (Geckoella). The two new species from the Southern Western Ghats can be assigned to the C. collegalensis species complex based on homogeneous granular dorsal scalation without rows of enlarged, rounded tubercles; with 4.2–17.9 % uncorrected ND2 sequence divergence from each other and other named species of the C. collegalensis complex. The third species from central India can be assigned to the C. nebulosus species complex based on its dorsal scalation consisting of granular scales intermixed with rows of enlarged, rounded tubercles, and a 14.1–17.4 % uncorrected ND2 sequence divergence from other named species. The three new species are distinct in colour pattern from all other dry-zone Geckoella and occupy distinct positions in multivariate morphospace from phylogenetically allied taxa. Cyrtodactylus shenbagathoppuensis sp. nov. and C. kalakadensis sp. nov. are from Srivilliputhur-Megamalai Tiger Reserve and Kalakad-Mundanthurai Tiger Reserve in the Southern Western Ghats (south of the Palghat Gap) of Tamil Nadu, respectively, while C. satpuraensis sp. nov. is found in multiple Tiger Reserves across the Satpuras in central and western India. The former two species are known only from a single locality each, while the last is distributed across localities as far apart as > 700 km with very low divergence.

Keywords

Cryptic species, endemic species, flagship species, integrative taxonomy, mitochondrial DNA, Satpuras, Western Ghats

Introduction

Cyrtodactylus Gray, 1827 is the most speciose gecko genus and among the most diverse vertebrate genera (Grismer et al. 2021) with over 400 species known to date (Uetz et al. 2026). The genus consists of four deeply divergent clades and numerous geographically cohesive subclades across a huge distributional range — from the Tibetan Plateau and Western Himalayas through South and Southeast Asia to the Western Pacific (Wood et al. 2012; Grismer et al. 2021). The wide range of morphological variation seen within each broad clade means that there are no morphological synapomorphies for the four broad clades, and the most comprehensive treatment of the genus split it into 32 species groups as a baseline for taxonomic and ecological studies (Wood et al. 2012; Grismer et al. 2021).

The triedrus species group, which corresponds to the subgenus Geckoella Gray, 1867, is a morphologically unique subclade and the only ground-dwelling radiation within the largely scansorial Cyrtodactylus (Agarwal and Karanth 2015; Grismer et al. 2020, 2021). Cyrtodactylus (Geckoella) includes 13 species endemic to peninsular India, four to Sri Lanka and one to southeastern Nepal (Smith 1935; Agarwal 2016; Agarwal et al. 2016; Amarasinghe et al. 2022; Narayanan et al. 2022; Agarwal et al. 2023a, 2023b; Gautam et al. 2026). Molecular phylogenies of Geckoella show a basal split separating the Sri Lankan C. triedrus complex, with the remaining species split into a wet-zone clade that includes the C. albofasciatus (Boulenger, 1885) and C. deccanensis (Günther, 1864) complexes and a dry-zone clade that includes C. jey­porensis (Beddome, 1878) and the C. collegalensis (Beddome, 1870) and C. nebulosus (Beddome, 1870) complexes (Agarwal and Karanth 2015; Amarasinghe et al. 2022; Agarwal et al. 2023a, 2023b).

The Cyrtodactylus collegalensis complex has 10 recognized species of which seven have been described since 2016, besides the revalidation of C. speciosus (Beddome, 1870) (Agarwal and Karanth 2015; Agarwal 2016; Agarwal et al. 2016; Narayanan et al. 2022; Agarwal et al. 2023a, 2023b). With the exception of C. varadgirii Agarwal et al., 2016 distributed in western and central India and C. yakhuna (Deraniyagala, 1945) in Sri Lanka, the remaining members of the complex are found in southern India (Fig. 1). The C. nebulosus complex has had only a single addition, the recently described C. teraiensis Gautam et al., 2026 from the Terai of southeastern Nepal — with the remaining members of the complex distributed in the northern Eastern Ghats and central India (Gautam et al. 2026; Fig. 1).

Figure 1. 

Map showing localities of members of the Cyrtodactylus collegalensis (circles = spotted morphs, squares = banded morphs) and C. nebulosus (triangles) complexes.

Mitochondrial sequence data of spotted morphs from previously unsampled localities in tiger habitat reveal the presence of three more unnamed lineages — two of the C. collegalensis complex from the Southern Western Ghats of Tamil Nadu and the third of the C. nebulosus species complex from central India. While the last morph appears widely distributed and has been previously recorded as C. nebulosus — with published records (Sharma 1976; Agarwal 2007; Sur et al. 2007) and numerous records on iNaturalist (https://www.inaturalist.org/taxa/539568-~~~PROTECTED_TN_33~~~-nebulosus accessed 22-01-2026) as well a published sequence as C. cf. nebulosus (Agarwal and Karanth 2015); the former two are not known in the literature (e.g., Mirza et al. 2010; Agarwal et al. 2016, 2023a, 2023b). We use morphological data to describe these as three new species: C. kalakadensis sp. nov., C. shenbagathoppuensis sp. nov. of the C. collegalensis complex and C. satpuraensis sp. nov. of the C. nebulosus complex.

Materials and Methods

Taxon sampling

A total of 26 specimens of the three new species were hand-collected by multiple groups over more than a decade. Specimens were photographed in life and later euthanized using isoflurane, with liver or tail biopsies taken from all localities and most individuals stored in molecular grade ethanol and subsequently at –20° C for genetic analysis. Specimens were then fixed in ~4 % formaldehyde for ~24 hours, washed in water, and transferred to 70 % ethanol for long-term storage. Specimens are deposited in the research collection facility at the National Centre for Biological Sciences, Bengaluru (NCBS/NRC).

Molecular data

We generated sequence data for three samples of Cyrtodactylus kalakadensis sp. nov. from two localities and two samples of Cyrtodactylus shenbagathoppuensis sp. nov. from a single locality each in the Southern Western Ghats, five samples of C. satpuraensis sp. nov. from different localities in central India, and six samples of C. aravindi Narayanan et al., 2022 from three localities (Table 1). DNA was extracted from liver biopsies/tail-tips using the Qiagen DNeasy kit and the mitochondrial gene ND2 (1038 base pairs, bp) was amplified and sequenced with primers MetF1 (L4437) and H5540/ H5934 (Macey et al. 1997). PCR volume was 25 μl and included 1μl template DNA and reactions were executed on an Eppendorf thermocycler. The PCR cycle started with denaturation for 2 minutes at 95 °C; followed by 32 cycles of 95 °C for 35 s, annealing at 50 °C for 35 s, and extension at 72 °C for 150 s. Purification and sequencing of PCR products was outsourced to Amnion Biotech Pvt. Ltd. and Barcode Biosciences (Bangalore, India), with complementary strands sequenced in most cases to ensure sequence accuracy. Sequences were aligned with default settings in CLUSTAL W (Thompson et al. 1994) as implemented in MEGA 5.2 (Tamura et al. 2011), with translation to amino acids to verify protein-coding sequences. The new sequences were combined with published sequences for the dry-zone clade of Cyrtodactylus (Geckoella), with members of the wet-zone clade used to root trees (Table 1).

Table 1.

List of Cyrtodactylus sequences used in this study with museum number, locality and GenBank accession number. Museum and voucher abbreviations: ADS = Anselm de Silva field series; AK-R = Akshay Khandekar field series; BG = Bivek Gautam field series; BNHS = Bombay Natural History Society, Mumbai; CES/ESV = Centre for Ecological Sciences, Bangalore; DMSSK = D.M.S. Suranjan Karunarathna field series; IAG = Ishan Agarwal field series; JB = John Boone private collection; NCBS and NRC (National Centre for Biological Sciences, Bangalore); NHM = Natural History Museum, Nepal; and ZSI-R = Zoological Survey of India, Kolkata.

Species Museum no. Locality GenBank Accession numbers
C. aravindi ZSI-R 28275 India: Tamil Nadu, Kanyakumari District, Muppandal OP131039 collegalensis complex
C. aravindi ZSI-R 28270 India: Tamil Nadu, Kanyakumari District, Thuckalay OP131040
C. aravindi AK-R 682 India: Tamil Nadu, Tirunelveli District, Thirukurungudi Range, KMTR PZ400957
C. aravindi AK-R 683 India: Tamil Nadu, Tirunelveli District, Thirukurungudi Range, KMTR PZ400958
C. aravindi AK-R 1035 India: Tamil Nadu, Kanyakumari District, Valli Chunai PZ400959
C. aravindi AK-R 1090 India: Tamil Nadu, Kanyakumari District, Aralvaimozhi PZ400960
C. aravindi BNHS 2519 India: Tamil Nadu, Kanyakumari District, Mahendragiri RF PZ400961
C. chengodumalaensis NRC-AA-1163 (CES09/1410) India: Kerala, Thrissur District, Mannuthy OP271668
C. chengodumalaensis NRC-AA-1166 (CES09/1411) India: Kerala, Thrissur District, Mannuthy OP271669
C. chengodumalaensis BNHS 2812 (CES09/1412) India: Kerala, Calicut District, Narayamkulam OP271670
C. chengodumalaensis NRC-AA-1161 (CES09/1449) India: Kerala, Malappuram District, Kumaragiri Estate OP271671
C. chengodumalaensis BNHS 2817 (AK 665) India: Kerala, Palakkad District, Cheeni Paara OP271672
C. collegalensis CES09/1403 India: Tamil Nadu, Salem District, Mettur Taluk KX632365
C. collegalensis CES09/1442 India: Karnataka, Chamarajanagar District, MM Hills KX632362
C. collegalensis CES09/1443 India: Karnataka, Chamarajanagar District, Kollegal Taluk KX632363
C. collegalensis CES09/1444 India: Karnataka, Chamarajanagar District, MM Hills KM878627
C. collegalensis CES09/1463 India: Karnataka, Chamarajanagar District, MM Hills KX632364
C. irulaorum NRC-AA-1266 (CES09/1363) India; Tamil Nadu, Chengalpattu District, near Chengalpet OQ674252
C. irulaorum NRC-AA-1270 (CES09/1441) India; Tamil Nadu, Chengalpattu District, near Chengalpet OQ674253
C. irulaorum NRC-AA-1271 (IAG 193) India: Tamil Nadu, Tiruvallur District, near Thervoy Kandigai OQ674254
C. kalakadensis sp. nov. NRC-AA-9678 (CES L 510) India: Tamil Nadu, Tirunelveli District, Manimuthar Falls, KMTR PZ400962
C. kalakadensis sp. nov. NRC-AA-9672 (AK-R 603) India: Tamil Nadu, Tirunelveli District, Kalakad Range, KMTR PZ400963
C. kalakadensis sp. nov. NRC-AA-9673 (AK-R 602) India: Tamil Nadu, Tirunelveli District, Kalakad Range, KMTR PZ400964
C. relictus NRC-AA-1275 (CES09/1470) India; Andhra Pradesh, Chittoor District, Kambakkam Durg OQ674255
C. relictus NRC-AA-1276 (CES09/1471) India; Andhra Pradesh, Nellore District, near Penchalakona OQ674256
C. relictus NRC-AA-1274 (CES09/1472) India; Andhra Pradesh, Nellore District, near Penchalakona OQ674257
C. rishivalleyensis ESV 104 (CES09/1245) India: Andhra Pradesh, Chittoor District KX698080
C. rishivalleyensis ESV 103 (CES09/1452) India: Andhra Pradesh, Chittoor District KX698081
C. shenbagathoppuensis sp. nov. NRC-AA-9671 (AK-R 1312) India: Tamil Nadu, Virudhunagar District, Shenbagathoppu, SMTR PZ400965
C. shenbagathoppuensis sp. nov. NRC-AA-9670 (AK-R 1462) India: Tamil Nadu, Virudhunagar District, Shenbagathoppu, SMTR PZ400966
C. speciosus CES09/1405 India: Tamil Nadu, Coimbatore District, Coimbatore North Taluk KM878623
C. cf. speciosus CES09/1249 India: Tamil Nadu, Salem District, below Yercaud KM878629
C. srilekhae ESV 101 (CES09/1432) India: Karnataka, Bengaluru Rural District KX698082
C. srilekhae ESV 102 (CES09/1461) India: Karnataka, Bengaluru Rural District KX698083 collegalensis complex
C. srilekhae CES09/1536 India: Karnataka, Tumkur District, Devarayandurga KX698084
C. varadgirii BNHS 1849 India: Maharashtra, Mumbai KX632367
C. varadgirii CES09/1381 India: Gujarat, Navsari District, Chikhli KM878612
C. varadgirii CES09/1433 India: Gujarat, Navsari District, Kangvai KX632369
C. yakhuna DMSSK 159 Sri Lanka: Polonnaruwa District, Giritale Forest MW713942
C. nebulosus NRC-AA-9627 (CES09/1201) India: Andhra Pradesh, Visakhapatnam District, Araku PX896570 nebulosus complex
C. nebulosus NRC-AA-9629 (CES09/1203) India: Andhra Pradesh, Visakhapatnam District, near Araku PX896571
C. nebulosus NRC-AA-9616 (CES09/1508) India: Andhra Pradesh, Visakhapatnam District, Araku-S.Peta Road PX896572
C. satpuraensis sp. nov. NRC-AA-9686 India: Madhya Pradesh, Balaghat District, near Bhimlat PZ400967
C. satpuraensis sp. nov. NRC-AA-9688 India: Madhya Pradesh, Shahdol District, Kumhedin PZ400968
C. satpuraensis sp. nov. NRC-AA-9690 India: Madhya Pradesh, Shahdol District, Kumhedin PZ400968
C. satpuraensis sp. nov. CES09/1377 India: Madhya Pradesh, Chhindwara District, Chhawada PZ400969
C. satpuraensis sp. nov. NRC-AA-9694 India: Maharashtra, Nandurbar District, Toranmal PZ400970
C. satpuraensis sp. nov. NRC-AA-9682 (IAG 080) India: Maharashtra, Gadchiroli District, Dongargaon PZ400971
C. teraiensis NHM 2025/390 (BG-81266) Nepal: Koshi Province, Morang District, Bhaunne PX879553
C. cf. nebulosus A CES09/1205 India: Orissa, Koraput District, Gupteswar KM878621
C. cf. nebulosus B CES09/1118 India: Orissa, Mayurbhanj District, Baripada KM878620
C. cf. nebulosus C CES09/1119 India: Orissa, Mayurbhanj District, Tikarpada KM878619
C. cf. nebulosus D CES09/1351 India: Andhra Pradesh, Visakhapatnam District, Narsipatnam KM878618
C. jeyporensis CES09/1206 India: Odisha, Koraput District, Deomali KM878617 jeyporensis
C. jeyporensis CES09/1356 India: Andhra Pradesh, Visakhapatnam District, Araku Valley KM878616
C. jeyporensis CES09/1519 India: Andhra Pradesh, Visakhapatnam District, Pedabayalu PZ436065
C. cf. albofasciatus CES09/1418 India: Goa, North Goa District, Chorla Ghat KM878611 Outgroups
C. deccanensis CES09/1112 India: Maharashtra, Satara District, Bhairavgad Fort KM878615

We calculated uncorrected p distances within the C. collegalensis and C. nebulosus complexes in MEGA 5.2 with the pairwise deletion option (Table 2). Phylogenetic relationships were reconstructed using Maximum Likelihood (ML) and Bayesian Inference (BI). The ML analysis was carried out using IQ-TREE (Nguyen et al. 2015; Trifinopoulos et al. 2016; http://iqtree.cibiv.univie.ac.at), with auto-selection of partitioning scheme and substitution models using ModelFinder (Kalyaanamoorthy et al. 2017), which selected three partitions by codon position (CP), applying the TN+F+G4 for CP 1 +2 and TPM2u+F+I+G4 for CP3, respectively. Settings for the analysis included edge-linked partitions, 1000 ultrafast bootstraps and other parameters at default settings. PartitionFinder 2.1.1 (Lanfear et al. 2012) was used to pick the best-fitting partitioning scheme and models of sequence evolution for BI, which partitioned the data by codon position and selected GTR+G, GTR+G, GTR+I+G for codon positions 1–3. Partitioned BI analyses were conducted in MrBayes 3.2.7 (Ronquist and Huelsenbeck 2003) with two parallel runs and four chains each (one cold and three hot) run for 2,000,000 generations sampling every 200 generations. Convergence was determined based on the standard deviation of split frequencies (<<0.01) and a 50 % majority rule consensus tree built using the sumt command after discarding the first 25 % of trees as burn-in. We consider nodes to be well supported when they receive bootstrap support >75 % and posterior probability > 0.95.

Table 2.

Mean uncorrected genetic distance (mitochondrial ND2 gene, 1038 nt) between species of the Cyrtodactylus collegalensis and C. nebulosus complexes. Along diagonal, maximum variation within species with multiple samples.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
1 C. kalakadensis sp. nov. 0.8
2 C. shenbagathoppuensis sp. nov. 11.8 0.4
3 C. aravindi 11.6 4.2 2.9
4 C. chengodumalaensis 12.0 11.8 11.9 1.3
5 C. collegalensis 14.2 13.1 13.9 13.2 4.9
6 C. irulaorum 16.5 15.5 15.4 15.1 16.7 0.1
7 C. relictus 17.9 15.6 15.9 16.6 16.4 10.9 0.7
8 C. rishivalleyensis 11.7 13.5 13.6 12.8 11.9 17.0 16.3 0.6
9 C. speciosus 15.0 15.3 15.0 13.7 13.1 17.6 17.1 13.4
10 C. cf. speciosus 14.2 13.1 14.1 14.9 13.2 16.3 15.8 12.8 6.7
11 C. srilekhae 13.3 12.3 13.3 13.4 12.6 17.7 17.2 9.2 12.8 11.8 1.0
12 C. varadgirii 14.4 12.9 13.5 14.6 13.8 14.8 15.7 12.2 16.7 14.2 14.1 1.1
13 C. yakhuna 11.6 10.7 11.3 10.8 12.0 15.0 16.8 13.0 14.4 13.7 12.9 12.6
14 C. satpuraensis sp. nov. 29.3 25.8 26.2 25.9 28.7 26.2 26.5 26.9 31.0 28.8 28.0 27.3 27.6 0.3
15 C. nebulosus 30.0 24.0 27.0 27.4 27.8 25.9 27.0 27.1 29.9 24.2 27.2 24.9 28.2 14.1 1.7
16 C. teraiensis 28.4 25.2 25.8 25.9 26.7 24.0 25.0 26.8 28.3 24.2 26.1 24.9 26.2 17.4 19.1
17 C. cf. nebulosus 1 28.8 24.4 25.9 25.0 27.2 25.1 25.8 26.2 29.1 26.1 27.3 24.9 28.2 5.4 13.2 17.4
18 C. cf. nebulosus 2 30.9 26.0 27.4 29.2 29.2 27.5 28.9 29.0 32.4 27.2 28.9 26.9 29.4 12.9 13.8 20.2 13.3
19 C. cf. nebulosus 3 30.7 25.7 27.3 28.3 29.3 27.3 26.7 27.7 30.8 25.5 27.0 26.6 28.9 11.4 12.3 19.2 11.2 10.5
20 C. cf. nebulosus 4 29.7 23.4 25.7 26.5 28.7 24.8 26.5 26.3 28.6 22.8 26.4 24.1 28.1 12.0 5.5 19.0 12.7 14.7 11.9

Species delimitation

We used two tree-based approaches to infer potential species boundaries that rely on differentiating between intra- and interspecific branching patterns —the single and multi-rate Poisson tree process (PTP and mPTP, respectively) (Zhang et al. 2013; Kapli et al. 2017). We dropped all outgroup taxa outside the dry-zone clade, and retained C. jeyporensis, and all described species as well as some unnamed lineages (represented by sequence data alone) of the C. collegalensis and C. nebulosus complexes. Analyses were carried out on the web server (https://mptp.h-its.org/#/tree) with default settings. Only putative species that showed diagnostic morphological characters were treated as species, with geographic range acting as an independent line of evidence.

Morphological data

A total of three, seven, and 16 specimens of each new species were used for morphological data and comparisons were made with all described species of the Cyrtodactylus collegalensis complex and C. nebulosus complex based on material in the collections of the Bombay Natural History Society, Mumbai (BNHS); Centre for Ecological Sciences, Bengaluru (CES); National Centre for Biological Sciences, Bengaluru (NRC); Natural History Museum, Kathmandu, Nepal (NHM); Natural History Museum, London (NHMUK, formerly BMNH) (Appendix 1); and from literature and photographs of C. yakhuna (Deraniyagala 1945; Somaweera and Somaweera 2009). We followed the methods of Agarwal et al. (2023a) and Gautam et al. (2026) to record morphological data. We recorded colour pattern from live photographs and took counts and measurements under a ZEISS Stemi 305 stereo dissecting microscope, with bilateral scale counts taken on the left and right of specimens. When summarizing characters, means are presented with ± standard deviation. We took the following measurements on the right side of the body, where possible, with a Mitutoyo digital vernier caliper (to the nearest 0.1 mm): snout vent length (SVL, from tip of snout to cloacal opening); tail length (TL, from cloaca to tip of tail); tail width (TW, measured at tail base); lower arm length (LAL, from elbow to distal end of wrist); crus length (CL, from knee to heel); axilla to groin length (AGL, from posterior margin of forelimb insertion to anterior margin of hindlimb insertion); body height (BH, maximum body height); body width (BW, maximum body width); head length (HL, distance between retroarticular process of lower jaw and tip of snout); head width (HW, maximum width of head); head depth (HD, maximum head depth at occiput); eye diameter (ED, greatest horizontal diameter of eye); eye to ear distance (EE, distance from anterior edge of ear opening to posterior margin of eye); eye to snout distance (ES, distance between anterior margin of eye and tip of snout); eye to nares distance (EN, distance between anterior margin of eye and posterior edge of nostril); internarial distance (IN, distance between nares); interorbital distance (IO, shortest distance between left and right supraciliary scale rows); ear length (EL, maximum length of ear opening).

The following meristic data were recorded for all specimens: number of internasals (INS, number of scales behind rostral and between supranasals); number of supralabials (SL), and infralabials (IL), from rostral and mental, respectively, to posterior-most enlarged scale at angle of the jaw; supralabials at midorbital position (SL M), and infralabials at midorbital position (IL M), from rostral and mental, respectively, to below the middle of the eye; (PVT, number of enlarged tubercles between limb insertions counted in a straight line immediately left or right of the vertebral column); dorsal tubercle rows (DTR, number of longitudinal rows of enlarged tubercles around the body counted at midbody); mid ventral scale rows in one eye diameter (MVSRED, enlarged ventral scales counted across the body at midbody in one eye diameter); mid ventral scale rows (MVSR, enlarged ventral scales counted across the midbody between lowest rows of much smaller dorsal granular scales); ventral scales 1 (VS1, counted on midbody ventral between forelimb and hindlimb insertions); ventral scales 2 (VS2, counted from the mental to anterior border of the cloacal opening); subdigital lamellae were counted in two series, distal lamellae series (DLAM, with lamellae distal to digital inflection including ventral claw sheath), and basal lamellae series (BLAM, includes scales at least twice the diameter of palmar scales to and including large scale on digital inflection), counted on manus: digit 1 (F1), digit 4 (F4), on pes: digit 1 (T1), digit 4 (T4), and digit 5 (T5); total lamellae (TLAMF1, TLAMF4, TLAMT1, TLAMT4, and TLAMT5 are sum of respective distal and basal lamellae); post cloacal tubercles (PCT, number of enlarged tubercles counted on either side of the tail base).

Colour pattern

We recorded colour pattern elements after Agarwal (2016); head markings based on position include prefrontal spot; interorbital spots; interparietal streak/spots flanked by parietal spots; post-occipital collar/spots; and preocular and postocular streak(s). Body pattern includes: dorsum with dark bands/paired spots/fused blotches; width of bands/spots relative to lighter interspaces; relative width/size of dorsal bands/spots; number of dark bands/paired spots posterior to post-occipital collar and up to hindlimb insertion; number of dark bands on original tail; presence/absence of stippling between bands/spots; presence/absence of lateral spots; presence/absence of streaks/spots on forelimb/hindlimb; presence/absence and extent of gular streaks.

Morphological analyses

We retained only adult specimens (≥ 75 % maximum SVL for each species), and pooled sexes as no sexual dimorphism has been reported in Cyrtodactylus (Gecko­ella) (e.g., Agarwal 2016, Agarwal et al. 2016, 2023), with separate analyses for the C. collegalensis complex (including only the species closely phylogenetically allied to the new taxa and from the Southern Western Ghats — C. aravindi and C. chengodumalaensis) and C. nebulosus complex (including only the two described species — C. nebulosus and C. teraiensis). We used the following mensural data: LAL, CL, AGL, HL, HW, EE, ES, EN, IO; which were allometrically size-corrected by SVL using the package GroupStruct (available at https://github.com/chankinonn/GroupStruct) (Chan and Grismer 2021, 2022) in R 4.1.3 (R Core Team 2022). We conducted a Principal Component Analysis (PCA) in which we retained the first two principal components to visualise separation of lineages in multivariate morphospace based on the size-corrected mensural data using the morpho_struct function in GroupStruct. We conducted a one-way ­ANOVA on the size-corrected mensural data as well as meristic characters, with the post-hoc Tukey’s HSD to determine which characters were significantly different (p < 0.05) between species pairs. For bilateral measurements, we used only the left side for statistical analyses but present the overall range in text and tables. Note MVSR and VS2 data are not available for C. chengoduma­laensis Agarwal et al., 2023.

Results

Phylogenetic relationships

Both ML and BI analyses recovered an identical topology albeit with differing levels of support, including a well-supported, dry-zone clade of Geckoella, within which the C. collegalensis complex forms the well-supported sister taxon to C. jeyporensis + the C. nebulosus complex (Fig. 2). The two new species from the Southern Western Ghats fall within the C. collegalensis complex — C. shenbagathoppuensis sp. nov. forms the well-supported sister taxon to C. aravindi, also from the Southern Western Ghats; the two collectively forming the poorly supported sister taxon to C. kalakadensis sp. nov.; and this entire Southern Western Ghats subclade forms the sister group to C. chengodumalaensis from Kerala + C. yakhuna from Sri Lanka (albeit with support only from ML). The two new species from the Southern Western Ghats are 11.8 % divergent from each other; C. shenbagathoppuensis sp. nov. is 4.2 % and C. kalakadensis sp. nov. 11.6 % divergent from C. aravindi; and the two are 10.7–17.9 % from other members of the C. collegalensis complex (Table 2). The new species from central India falls in the C. nebulosus complex and is the well-supported sister taxon to C. cf. nebulosus 1 from eastern Odisha, the two collectively sister to C. cf. nebulosus 2 + C. cf. nebulosus 3 from central and northern Odisha. The new species is 13.7–15.2 % (mean 14.1 %) divergent from C. nebulosus and 16.3–18.5 % (mean 17.4 %) from C. teraiensis and 5.4–12.9 % from other unnamed lineages within the C. nebulosus complex (Table 2). Intraspecific divergence within the three new species is < 0.8 %.

Figure 2. 

Main; Maximum likelihood phylogeny of the dry-zone clade of Cyrtodactylus (Geckoella) with bootstrap support (≥ 70) / posterior probability (≥ 0.99) shown at nodes; species delimited by PTP shown in alternating red and blue; outgroups not shown. Inset; plot of Principal Components 1 and 2 from size-corrected morphometric data for the C. collegalensis and C. nebulosus complexes.

Species delimitation and morphological analyses

We recovered 23 putative species within the dry-zone clade using PTP and 17 with mPTP. The PTP solution has 15 species within the C. collegalensis complex including all 10 described species, as well as C. kalakadensis sp. nov., C. shenbagathoppuensis sp. nov., C. cf. speciosus, and C. collegalensis split into three lineages (Fig. 2). The C. collegalensis lineages delimited as separate species are 3.2–4.9 % divergent from one another and each locality is represented by just a single tissue sample with no specimens, precluding any formal action. The PTP solution has seven species within the C. nebulosus complex — C. nebulosus, C. teraiensis, C. satpuraensis sp. nov. and C. cf. nebulosus 1–4 (Fig. 2). The mPTP solution combines C. speciosus + C. cf. speciosus and C. aravindi + C. shenbagathoppuensis sp. nov. within the C. collegalensis complex, and C. nebulosus + C. cf. nebulosus 4 and C. cf. nebulosus 2 + C. cf. nebulosus 3 within the C. nebulosus complex.

The first two principal components for the Southern Western Ghats members of the collegalensis complex explain 85.6 % variation with C. shenbagathoppuensis sp. nov. contained within C. kalakadensis sp. nov., the two separated from C. aravindi and C. chengodumalaensis along PC1 (Fig. 2; PCA outputs in supplementary material). This is reflected in the ANOVA of the size corrected data which has no diagnostic characters between C. shenbagathoppuensis sp. nov. and C. kalakadensis sp. nov., though they have significantly different values for MVSR and VS2 (Table 3) and a spotted versus banded dorsal colour pattern. The first two Principal Components for the nebulosus complex explain 66.4 % variation with C. satpuraensis sp. nov. separated from C. nebulosus and C. teraiensis along PC1 but not PC2 (Fig. 2). The new species differs significantly from C. nebulosus across a number of size-corrected characters and from C. teraiensis in LAL, VS2 and DTR, (Table 3; see diagnosis of new species below).

Table 3.

Summary of significantly different meristic and size-corrected morphometric characters from Tukey’s post-hoc test from ANOVA for Southern Western Ghat members of the Cyrtodactylus collegalensis complex (below diagonal; 1 = C. shenbagathoppuensis sp. nov., 2 = C. kalakadensis sp. nov., 3 = C. aravindi, 4 = C. chengodumalaensis) and C. nebulosus complex (above diagonal; 1 = C. teraiensis, 2 = C. nebulosus, 3 = C. satpuraensis sp. nov.). Abbreviations as listed in Material and Methods; note MVSR and VS2 data missing for C. chengodumalaensis.

1 2 3
1 AGL, IO, DTR, MVSR, VS2 LAL, DTR, MVSR, VS2
2 VS2 CL, LAL, HL, HW, EE, ES, EN, IO, VS2
3 LAL, CL, AGL, HW, HL, EE, ES, EN; LAL, VS2
4 LAL, CL, AGL, HW, HL, EE, ES, EN LAL LAL, CL, AGL, HW, HL, EE, ES

We consider the PTP solution to represent the true diversity within the group as mPTP lumps numerous morphologically distinct lineages, most of which are highly divergent from other lineages in mtDNA sequence data, besides combining multiple allopatrically distributed lineages. Below, we formally describe C. kalakadensis sp. nov. and C. shenbagathoppuensis sp. nov. of the C. collegalensis complex and C. satpuraensis sp. nov. of the C. nebulosus complex using morphological data.

Systematics

Cyrtodactylus (Geckoella) kalakadensis Agarwal, Thackeray, Gangalmale, Pal & Khandekar, sp. nov.

Figures 3, 4, 5, 6; Tables 4, 5

Holotype.

NRC-AA-9672 (AK-R 603), adult female, from near Wood House (8.5220°N, 77.5040°E; ca. 230 m asl.), Kalakad Range, Kalakad-Mundanthurai Tiger Reserve (KMTR), Tirunelveli District, Tamil Nadu State, India, collected by Akshay Khandekar, Swapnil Pawar and team, on 29th April 2021.

Figure 3. 

Cyrtodactylus (Geckoella) kalakadensis sp. nov. (holotype, NRC-AA-9672): A dorsal view of body, B ventral view of body, C dorsal view of head, D ventral view of head, and E right side lateral view of head. Scale bars 10 mm (A, B) and 5 mm (CE); photos by Akshay Khandekar.

Figure 4. 

Cyrtodactylus (Geckoella) kalakadensis sp. nov. (holotype, NRC-AA-9672): A dorsal view of midbody, B ventral view of midbody, C ventral view of left manus, D ventral view of left pes. Scale bars 5 mm; photos by Akshay Khandekar.

Figure 5. 

Colouration in life and habitat of Cyrtodactylus (Geckoella) kalakadensis sp. nov.: A holotype, female (NRC-AA-9672), B paratype, male (NRC-AA-9672), C paratype, male (NRC-AA-9674), D paratype, male (NRC-AA-9675), E paratype, female (NRC-AA-9676), F paratype, male (NRC-AA-9678), and G general habitat at the type locality, near Sengaltheri, KMTR, Tamil Nadu. Photos by Akshay Khandekar and Saunak Pal (F).

Figure 6. 

Paratypes of Cyrtodactylus (Geckoella) kalakadensis sp. nov. from left to right, NRC-AA-9673–9678: A dorsal view, B ventral view. Scale bars 10 mm; photos by Akshay Khandekar.

Table 4.

Measurements (mm) data for the type series of the two new species. Abbreviations are listed in Materials and Methods except for * = tail incomplete or regenerated; M = male; F = female, SA = subadult.

Species Cyrtodactylus kalakadensis sp. nov. C. shenbagathoppuensis sp. nov.
Type Holotype Paratypes Holotype Paratypes
Museum number NRC-AA-9672 NRC-AA-9673 NRC-AA-9674 NRC-AA-9675 NRC-AA-9676 NRC-AA-9677 NRC-AA-9678 NRC-AA-9669 NRC-AA-9670 NRC-AA-9671
Sex F M M M F F M M F SA M
SVL 55.0 49.8 47.1 37.9 53.9 53.8 42.5 48.4 53.4 34.0
TL 35.3 25.7* 26.0* 26.2 37.8 8.5* 20.5* 36.8 43.9 6.4*
TW 4.1 5.3 5.4 4.5 4.3 5.1 4.6 5.6 4.3 3.1
LAL 7.6 7.1 7.1 5.4 7.4 7.9 6.3 7.1 7.8 4.6
CL 8.8 8.5 8.0 7.0 8.4 9.1 7.5 8.2 9.0 5.6
AGL 25.3 20.2 20.1 14.5 25.5 25.4 18.7 21.6 23.4 14.9
BH 6.7 7.0 5.8 4.3 6.8 6.9 3.9 5.0 5.4 3.8
BW 11.1 10.2 8.8 7.8 10.2 11.2 6.2 8.8 11.4 6.4
HL 14.4 13.8 12.8 10.0 14.1 14.9 11.2 13.2 14.3 9.5
HW 10.1 10.2 9.5 7.3 10.4 10.5 8.1 9.3 9.9 7.1
HD 6.4 5.7 5.6 5.4 6.8 6.9 5.4 5.7 6.9 4.7
ED 3.3 3.0 3.3 2.4 3.5 3.9 2.8 3.3 3.3 2.5
EE 4.6 4.2 3.9 3.1 4.2 4.4 3.5 3.7 4.5 2.9
ES 6.0 6.2 5.3 4.4 6.2 6.3 5.1 5.7 6.2 4.1
EN 4.4 4.4 3.9 3.0 4.3 4.8 3.7 4.0 4.4 2.9
IN 1.9 2.1 1.8 1.4 2.0 2.0 1.7 1.8 1.9 1.5
IO 4.4 4.4 4.1 3.2 4 4.2 2.6 3.5 3.8 2.5
EL 0.8 1.0 1.1 0.7 1.2 1.2 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.8
Table 5.

Meristic data for the type series of the two new species. Abbreviations are listed in Materials and Methods except for * = incomplete data; / = data unavailable, L&R = left and right; M = male; F = female, SA = subadult.

Species Cyrtodactylus kalakadensis sp. nov. C. shenbagathoppuensis sp. nov.
Type Holotype Paratypes Holotype Paratypes
Museum number NRC-AA-9672 NRC-AA-9673 NRC-AA-9674 NRC-AA-9675 NRC-AA-9676 NRC-AA-9677 NRC-AA-9678 NRC-AA-9669 NRC-AA-9670 NRC-AA-9671
Sex F M M M F F M M F SA M
INS 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
SL L&R 10&10 10&10 10&10 9&9 10&9 10&10 10&10 10&11 10&11 10&10
IL L&R 8&8 9&9 9&9 7&8 9&9 9&9 9&10 7&7 9&9 8&8
SL M L&R 6&6 6&6 7&6 6&6 7&6 7&7 7&7 6&7 6&7 6&6
IL M L&R 5&5 6&6 5&5 5&5 6&6 5&6 5&6 5&5 5&6 5&5
MVSRED 17 18 17 15 15 19 16 15 15 /
MVSR 42 34 35* 30 32 36 44 31 33 39
VS1 80 76 79 71 73 67 88 61 64 71
VS2 198 188 202 175* 185 185 195 168 164 174
DLAMF1 L&R 7&7 5*&7 8&8 7&7 8&8 7&7 8&8 5*&8 7&7 8&7
BLAMF1 L&R 4&3 4&5 5&3 5&4 5&4 5&5 4&5 3&3 3&3 4&4
DLAMF4 L&R 8&8 8&8 9&8 7&7 8&8 9&9 9&9 9&9 7&7 8&8
BLAMF4 L&R 5&5 6&6 6&6 5&5 6&6 6&6 6&6 6&6 5&5 6&5
DLAMT1 L&R 8&8 9&9 8&9 8&8 8&9 10&10 8&9 11&10 9&8 9&8
BLAMT1 L&R 3&4 2&3 3&2 2&3 3&3 3&3 3&4 3&4 4&4 3&3
DLAMT4 L&R 10&10 10&10 10&10 9&9 9&9 11&11 10&11 10&10 9&9 9&10
BLAMT4 L&R 8&8 9&8 9&9 9&8 9&9 10&9 9&8 8&8 9&9 8&7
DLAMT5 L&R 11&11 11&11 10&10 9&10 11&11 12&13 10&11 11&11 10&10 9&9
BLAMT5 L&R 6&7 6&6 6&6 5&5 6&6 7&7 7&7 5&5 7&7 5&6
TLAMF1 L&R 11&10 9*&12 13&11 12&11 13&12 12&12 12&13 8*&11 10&10 12&11
TLAMF4 L&R 13&13 14&14 15&14 12&12 14&14 15&15 15&15 15&15 12&12 14&13
TLAMT1 L&R 11&12 11&12 11&11 10&11 11&12 13&13 11&13 14&14 13&12 12&11
TLAMT4 L&R 18&18 19&18 19&19 18&17 18&18 21&20 19&19 18&18 18&18 17&17
TLAMT5 L&R 17&18 17&17 16&16 14&15 17&17 19&20 17&18 16&16 17&17 14&15
PCT L&R 3&3 2&2 2&2 2&2 2&2 3&2 3&2 2&3 2&2 3&3

Paratypes.

NRC-AA-9673 (AK-R 602), NRC-AA-9674 (AK-R 604), adult males, same collection data as holotype; NRC-AA-9675 (AK-R 665), adult male, NRC-AA-9676 (AK-R 979), NRC-AA-9677 (AK-R 980), adult females, from Kalakad Range (8.5274°N, 77.4868°E; ca. 320 m asl.) collected by Akshay Khandekar, Ishan Agarwal, Swapnil Pawar and team on 30th March 2022; NRC-AA-9678 (CESL 510), adult male, from Manimuthar, Mundanthurai Range (8.6244°N, 77.4109 °E; ca. 130 m asl.) collected by Saunak Pal on 18th December 2011; all from KMTR, Tirunelveli District.

Diagnosis.

A small-sized Cyrtodactylus (Geckoella), snout to vent length up to 55 mm (n = 7); tail shorter than SVL. Dorsal pholidosis on trunk homogeneous; covered with smooth, subcircular, weakly conical granular scales; ventral scales slightly larger than granular scales on dorsum, smooth, oval, subimbricate with rounded end, subequal from chest to vent; 15–19 ventral scales at midbody contained within one eye diameter, 30–44 ventral scales across belly at midbody, 67–88 longitudinal scales between axilla to groin, 185–202 longitudinal scales from mental to cloaca; subdigital scansors smooth, unnotched, and mostly entire; 10–13 lamellae under digit I of manus and pes, 12–15 lamellae under digit IV of manus and 17–21 lamellae under digit IV of pes; absence of femoral and precloacal pores; absence of enlarged precloacal or femoral scales, no precloacal groove. Ground colouration khaki, three brown black-edged cross-bars between occiput and hindlimb insertions that may be notched or broken into spots; post-occipital collar contiguous, notched or separated mid-vertebrally into pair of spots, no regular spots on flanks, darker markings cover > 50 % of dorsum between limb insertions.

Comparisons with members of the C. collegalensis complex.

The small body size and original tail shorter than SVL, besides the lack of femoral or precloacal pores in males, easily differentiate the new species from all other Cyrtodactylus, and its homogeneous dorsal pholidosis without rows of enlarged, rounded tubercles from all Cyrtodactylus (Geckoella) apart from the C. collegalensis complex. The new species can be distinguished by the absence of a few, enlarged dorsal tubercles on the dorsum (versus the presence of these tubercles in C. chengodumalaensis) and by the absence of a patch of enlarged, roughly hexagonal scales on the canthus rostralis and beneath the angle of the lower jaw (versus the presence of these enlarged scales in C. varadgirii). The dorsal pattern consisting of three dark brown cross-bars (sometimes notched or forming paired spots) from behind nape to hindlimb insertions of C. kalakadensis sp. nov. easily distinguishes it from the species with a banded dorsal pattern — C. aravindi (single dark broad band and one or two single dark spots), C. rishivalleyensis Agarwal, 2016 and C. speciosus (two broad dark bands), and C. yakhuna (usually two broad dark bands or paired spots on dorsum); as well as the spotted species with four or more rows of spots from behind nape to hindlimb insertions: C. chengodumalaensis and C. varadgirii (4–6 pairs of dark spots), C. irulaorum Agarwal, Thackeray & Khandekar, 2023 and C. relictus Agarwal, Thackeray & Khandekar, 2023 (four pairs of dark spots). Both C. collegalensis and C. srilekhae Agarwal, 2016 also have three pairs of dark dorsal markings from nape to hindlimb insertions, however C. kalakadensis sp. nov. may be distinguished by the condition of the dark markings on dorsum between nape and hindlimb insertions — which consist of bands that continue laterally onto the flanks where they flare out and may meet, first band entire/ mid-vertebrally notched and second band entire/ notched/ rarely just separated into two spots (versus first and second dark marking consisting of paired spots that do not extend onto flank and may be fused centrally in C. collegalensis; and first dark marking a pair of spots that may be fused and second row of dark markings usually consisting of a small central spot and two or more larger indistinct blotches laterally in C. srilekhae). Cyrtodactylus kalakadensis sp. nov. is diagnosed against C. shenbagathoppuensis sp. nov. after the description of the latter.

Description of the holotype.

Adult female in good state of preservation except tail slightly bent towards left, a 2.9 mm longitudinal skin injury on precloacal region, and a 7.9 mm vertical incision in the sternal region for liver tissue collection (Fig. 3A, B). SVL 55.0 mm, head short (HL/SVL 0.26), wide (HW/ HL 0.70), not strongly depressed (HD/HL 0.44), slightly narrower than body (HW/BW 0.91), and distinct from neck (Fig. 3C–E). Loreal region slightly inflated, canthus rostralis not prominent. Snout less than half head length (ES/HL 0.42) and less than two times eye diameter (ES/ED 1.82); scales on snout, canthus rostralis, and loreal region large, subcircular, smooth and, flattened; much larger than granular scales on forehead and interorbital region; occipital and temporal region with much smaller, smooth granules (Fig. 3C). Eye small (ED/HL 0.23); pupil vertical, dilated with indistinct crenulate margins; supraciliaries short, larger anteriorly, not elongate; 14 interorbital scale rows across narrowest point of frontal; 40 scale rows between left and right supraciliaries at mid-orbit (Fig. 3C, E). Ear-opening oval, small (EL/HL 0.05); eye to ear distance more than eye diameter (EE/ED 1.39). Rostral roughly 1.7 times wider (2.5 mm) than deep (1.5 mm), incompletely divided dorsally by weakly developed rostral groove for slightly more than half of its height; a single enlarged supranasal on each side, more than two times larger than the postnasals, separated from each other by a single enlarged internasal on the snout; three subequal postnasals, much smaller than supranasals; rostral in contact with nostril, supralabial I, supranasals, and internasals on either side; nostrils oval, directed somewhat outwards, covering most of the nasal scale; surrounded on either side by supralabial I, rostral, supranasals, and postnasals; two single row of smaller scales separate the orbit from the supralabials (Fig. 3E). Mental enlarged, triangular, wider (2.3 mm) than long (1.6 mm); two pairs of postmentals; inner pair in strong contact with each other, roughly pentangular, and slightly shorter than mental (1.9 mm length); bordered by mental, infralabial I, outer postmental, three chin scales on left and single on right side; outer postmentals separated from each other by inner postmentals, roughly rectangular and almost half the size (1.1 mm length) of inner pair; bordered by inner postmentals, infralabial I and II, and three enlarged chin shields on either side; chin shields bordering postmentals and infralabials flat, smooth, smaller than outermost postmentals; rest flattened, even smaller, smooth; three or four rows of enlarged elongated scales separating gular scales from infralabials (Fig. 3D). Ten supralabials up to angle of jaw, and eight at midorbital position on each side (supralabial four divided into two scales on right); six infralabials up to angle of jaw, and five infralabials at midorbital position on both sides (Fig. 3E).

Body relatively slender (BW/AGL 0.44), trunk less than half of SVL (AGL/SVL 0.46) without ventrolateral folds. Dorsal pholidosis on trunk homogeneous; covered with smooth, subcircular, weakly conical granular scales; 14 dorsal midbody scale rows across trunk contained within one eye diameter (Fig. 4A). Granular scales on occiput and nape slightly smaller than those on body dorsum; granular scales on flank equally larger than those on dorsum. Ventral scales slightly larger than granular scales on dorsum, subequal from chest to vent, smooth, oval, and subimbricate with rounded end; 17 ventral scale rows at midbody contained within one eye diameter; 42 midbody scale rows across belly (Fig. 4B). Scales on throat slightly smaller than those on belly; gular region with much smaller granular scales, those on chin bordering postmentals, enlarged, juxtaposed and flattened (Fig. 3D). No enlarged precloacal or femoral scales, no precloacal or femoral pores; no precloacal groove (Fig. 3B).

Scales on palm and soles granular, smooth, rounded to oval; scales on dorsal aspects of limbs heterogeneous in shape and size; mixture of small, granules similar to dorsum and many smooth flattened and subimbricate scales which are much larger than granules on the body dorsum, largest on anterior aspect of the hands and feet; lateral and ventral aspects of fore-limbs with small granular scales; ventral aspect of thigh with scales similar to midbody ventrals except slightly smaller and gradually becoming even smaller and granular on posterior aspect; ventral aspect of shank with large, imbricate scales (Fig. 3A, B). Fore-limbs and hind-limbs slightly long, slender (LAL/SVL 0.14; CL/SVL 0.16); digits short, slender, with a strong, recurved claw, moderately inflected, distal portions laterally compressed. Series of unpaired lamellae on basal portion of digits except one or two which on some digits are paired, separated from narrower distal lamellae by a single large lamella at the inflection, unpaired except one or two which are divided; basal lamellae series: (4-5-5-5-4 right manus, Fig. 4C; 4-7-6-8-7 right pes, Fig. 4D), (4-6-5-5-4 left manus; 3-6-7-8-6 left pes); distal lamellae series: (7-8-8-8-7 right manus, Fig. 4C; 8-8-10-10-10 right pes, Fig. 4D), (7-7-9-8-7 left manus; 8-8-11-10-11 left pes). Relative length of digits (measurements in mm in parentheses): III (3.1) > IV (2.6) > II (2.8) > V (2.4) > I (1.9) (right manus); III (4.0) > IV (3.8) > V (3.7) = II (3.5) > I (2.1) (right pes).

Tail original, circular in cross section with indistinct median dorsal furrow, relatively thick, tapering gradually to tip, unsegmented, shorter than snout-vent length (TL/SVL 0.64). Scales on dorsal aspect of tail base heterogenous, a few scattered enlarged, smooth to feebly keeled tubercles intermixed with much smaller and smooth granular scales, enlarged tubercles occasionally extending onto groin; scales on dorsal aspect of tail large flat, subcircular, smooth, and imbricate, becoming slightly larger towards lateral aspect, largest on ventral side, but not forming median row of transversely enlarged subcaudal scales. Small, smooth, subequal, conical postcloacal spurs, three on either side of tail base; no hemipenial swelling. Tail slightly constricted at the base (Fig. 3A, B).

Colouration in life.

Dorsal ground colour of body, head and limbs khaki, three pairs of dark brown, black-edged cross-bars from nape to hindlimb insertions and one above tail base, second bar notched mid-vertebrally and third divided into paired spots; bars widen on flanks; scattered small black spots on light interspaces of dorsum. Dark brown dorsal markings edged by black on the outer 2–5 rows of granules; ventrolateral portion of flanks heavily pigmented from the dorsal bands with a few scattered and irregular fine black spots. Tail dorsum with about four paired spots following pair of spots on tail base; dorsum of limbs with fine spots, digits with alternating pale and brown bands. Post-occipital collar broken mid-vertebrally, composed of two elongate spots contiguous with postorbital streak; interparietal streak and other head markings broken into spots (Fig. 5A).

Variation and additional information from paratypes.

There are four adult male, and two adult female paratypes, SVL ranging from 37.9–53.9 mm (Tables 4, 5). All specimens resemble the holotype except for the following variation: inner postmental bordered by mental, infralabial I, outer postmental in all paratypes; additionally, bordered by one chin scale on left and three on right in NRC-AA-9673, three chin scales on left and two on right in NRC-AA-9674 and NRC-AA-9678, two chin scales on either side in NRC-AA-9675 and NRC-AA-9677, two chin scales on left and one on right in NRC-AA-9676. Outer postmental bordered by inner postmentals, infralabial I and II; additionally, bordered by three chin scales on left and four on right in NRC-AA-9674 and NRC-AA-9675. Two paratypes (NRC-AA-9675 and NRC-AA-9676) have an original and complete tail, much shorter than body (TL/SVL 0.69, 0.70); and remaining paratypes (NRC-AA-9673, NRC-AA-9674, NRC-AA-9677, NRC-AA-9678) are with short and entirely regenerated tails (0.52, 0.55, 0.16 and 0.48 respectively) (Fig. 6A, B). There is considerable variation in dorsal colour pattern of body and head in the type series (Fig. 5B–F); NRC-AA-9676 and NRC-AA-9677 are the most pigmented with the dark dorsal bands covering most of dorsum; A NRC-AA-9673 and NRC-AA-9677 have the first dark marking on dorsum notched; NRC-AA-9673, NRC-AA-9675, NRC-AA-9676, and NRC-AA-9678 have the second dark marking on dorsum broken into spots or deeply notched while the other paratypes have a solid band; NRC-AA-9673, NRC-AA-9678 have the third dark marking on dorsum broken into spots like the holotype while the other paratypes have a solid band.

Distribution and natural history.

Cyrtodactylus (Geckoella) kalakadensis sp. nov. is known from only three closely-spaced localities about 15 km apart at elevations of ~130–320 m (Fig. 1). These low elevation localities consist of moist deciduous forest with good canopy cover and leaf litter (Fig. 5G). The species was seen active after dark (~1830–2100 hrs) on forest floor especially in areas with high leaf litter. A total of 13 individuals were observed in three different trips. The new species is sympatric with the KMTR endemics Cnemaspis sp. (Khandekar et al. unpub. data), Hemidactylus acanthopholis Mirza & Sanap, 2014, and Dravidoseps kalakadensis Agarwal, Thackeray & Khandekar, 2024; beside common lizard species like H. leschenaultii Duméril & Bibron, 1836, H. frenatus Duméril & Bibron, 1836, Eutropis carinata (Schneider, 1801), E. cf. macularia, Riopa cf. albopunctata, Calotes calotes (Linnaeus, 1758), C. versicolor (Daudin, 1802), and Psammophilus cf. blanfordanus.

Etymology.

The specific epithet is a toponym for the type and other known localities of the new species, in Kalakad Forest Range, KMTR (Kalakad-Mundanthurai Tiger Reserve), Tirunelveli District, Tamil Nadu. We suggest the common name Kalakad or KMTR Geckoella.

Cyrtodactylus shenbagathoppuensis Agarwal, Thackeray, Gangalmale, Satheeshkumar & Khandekar, sp. nov.

Figures 7, 8, 9, 10; Tables 4, 5

Holotype.

NRC-AA-9669 (AK-R 1461), adult male, from Shenbagathoppu (9.5709°N, 77.5625°E; ca. 320 m asl.), Srivilliputhur-Megamalai Tiger Reserve (SMTR), Virudhunagar District, Tamil Nadu state, India; collected by Akshay Khandekar, Ishan Agarwal, Swapnil Pawar and team on 21th April 2022.

Figure 7. 

Cyrtodactylus (Geckoella) shenbagathoppuensis sp. nov. (holotype, NRC-AA-9669): A dorsal view of body, B ventral view of body, C dorsal view of head, D ventral view of head, and E right side lateral view of head. Scale bars 10 mm (A, B) and 5 mm (CE); photos by Akshay Khandekar.

Figure 8. 

Cyrtodactylus (Geckoella) shenbagathoppuensis sp. nov. (holotype, NRC-AA-9669): A dorsal view of midbody, B ventral view of midbody, C ventral view of left manus, D ventral view of left pes. Scale bars 5 mm; photos by Akshay Khandekar.

Figure 9. 

Colouration in life and habitat of Cyrtodactylus (Geckoella) shenbagathoppuensis sp. nov.: A holotype, male (NRC-AA-9669), B paratype, female (NRC-AA-9670), C paratype, subadult male (NRC-AA-9671), D uncollected specimen, and E general habitat at the type locality, Shenbagathoppu, SMTR, Tamil Nadu. Photos by Ishan Agarwal, Gopal Murali (D), Akshay Khandekar (E).

Figure 10. 

Paratypes of Cyrtodactylus (Geckoella) shenbagathoppuensis sp. nov. from left to right, NRC-AA-9670 and NRC-AA-9671: A dorsal view, B ventral view. Scale bars 10 mm; photos by Akshay Khandekar.

Paratypes.

NRC-AA-9671 (AK-R 1312), subadult male, same data as holotype and NRC-AA-9670 (AK-R 1462), adult female, same data as holotype except collected on 15th April 2022 from ~ 1.5 km SW of type locality (9.5580°N, 77.5560°E; ca. 230 m asl.).

Diagnosis.

A small-sized Cyrtodactylus (Geckoella), snout to vent length up to 53.4 mm (n = 3); tail shorter than SVL. Dorsal pholidosis on trunk homogeneous; covered with smooth, subcircular, weakly conical granular scales; ventral scales much larger than granular scales on dorsum, smooth, subcircular, subimbricate with rounded end, subequal from chest to vent; 15 ventral scales at midbody contained within one eye diameter, 31–39 ventral scales across belly at midbody, 61–71 longitudinal scales between axilla to groin, 164–174 longitudinal scales from mental to cloaca; subdigital scansors smooth, unnotched, and mostly entire; 10–12 lamellae under digit I of manus and 11–14 lamellae under digit I of pes, 12–15 lamellae under digit IV of manus and 17 or 18 lamellae under digit IV of pes; absence of femoral and precloacal pores; absence of enlarged precloacal or femoral scales, no precloacal groove. Ground colouration tan, with five or six dark brown black-edged spots between nape and hindlimb insertions, spots well-separated along mid-vertebral line; post-occipital collar separated mid-vertebrally into pair of spots, no regular spots on flanks, darker markings cover ~ 50 % of dorsum between limb insertions.

Comparisons with members of the C. collegalensis com­plex.

The small body size and original tail shorter than SVL, besides the lack of femoral or precloacal pores in males, easily differentiate the new species from all other Cyrtodactylus, and its homogeneous dorsal pholidosis without rows of enlarged, rounded tubercles from all Cyrtodactylus (Geckoella) apart from the C. collegalensis complex. The new species can be distinguished by the absence of a few, enlarged dorsal tubercles on the dorsum (versus the presence of these tubercles in C. chengodumalaensis) and by the absence of a patch of enlarged, roughly hexagonal scales on the canthus rostralis and beneath the angle of the lower jaw (versus the presence of these enlarged scales in C. varadgirii).The dorsal pattern consisting of five or six pairs of dark brown spots from behind nape to hindlimb insertions of C. shenbagathoppuensis sp. nov. easily distinguishes it from the species with a banded dorsal pattern — C. aravindi (single dark broad band and one or two single dark spots), C. rishivalleyensis and C. speciosus (two broad dark bands), C. kalakadensis sp. nov. (three dark brown dorsal cross-bars that are sometimes notched or form paired spots) and C. yakhuna (usually two broad dark bands or paired spots on dorsum); as well as the species with four or less rows of spots from behind nape to hindlimb insertions: C. collegalensis (three pairs of dark spots that may be fused forming horizontal figure 8-shaped markings), C. irulaorum and C. relictus (four pairs of dark spots), and C. srilekhae (three rows of irregular dark blotches). The new species is most similar in colour pattern to C. chengodumalaensis and C. varadgirii (4–6 pairs of dark spots from behind nape to hindlimb insertions) but can be distinguished by the absence of a few, enlarged dorsal tubercles on the dorsum (versus the presence of these tubercles in C. chengodumalaensis) and by the absence of a patch of enlarged, roughly hexagonal scales on the canthus rostralis and beneath the angle of the lower jaw (versus the presence of these enlarged scales in C. varadgirii); as well as by its body size up to at least 53.7 mm SVL (versus up to 48 mm in C. aravindi and C. chengodumalaensis). Cyrtodactylus shenbagathoppuensis sp. nov. occupies a distinct position in multivariate morphospace (Fig. 2) and is distinguished from its sister species, C. aravindi on a number of morphometric variables (Table 3), colour pattern and body size (up to at least 53.7 mm SVL versus up to 48 mm in C. aravindi); and from the other Southern Western Ghats species described above in number of ventral scales between mental and cloaca (164–174 versus 185–202 in C. kalakadensis sp. nov.).

Description of holotype.

Adult male in good state of preservation except head bent towards left, tail sigmoid, and a 4.9 mm vertical incision in the abdominal region for liver tissue collection (Fig. 7A, B). SVL 48.4 mm, head short (HL/SVL 0.27), wide (HW/ HL 0.70), not strongly depressed (HD/HL 0.43), slightly broader than body (HW/BW 1.05), and distinct from neck (Fig. 7C–E). Loreal region slightly inflated, canthus rostralis not prominent. Snout marginally less than half head length (ES/HL 0.43), slightly less than twice eye diameter (ES/ED 1.72); scales on snout, canthus rostralis, and loreal region large, subcircular, smooth and, flattened; much larger than granular scales on forehead and interorbital region; occipital and temporal region with much smaller, smooth granules (Fig. 7C, E). Eye small (ED/HL 0.25); pupil vertical, dilated with indistinct crenulate margins; supraciliaries short, larger anteriorly, not elongate; 13 interorbital scale rows across narrowest point of frontal; 39 scale rows between left and right supraciliaries at mid-orbit (Fig. 7E). Ear-opening oval, small (EL/HL 0.07); eye to ear distance slightly more than eye diameter (EE/ED 1.12). Rostral roughly 1.7 times wider (2.4 mm) than deep (1.4 mm), incompletely divided dorsally by weakly developed rostral groove for slightly more than half of its height; a single enlarged supranasal on each side, more than three times larger than the postnasals, separated from each other by a single enlarged internasal on the snout; three subequal postnasals, much smaller than supranasals; rostral in contact with nostril, supralabial I, supranasals, and internasals on either side; nostrils oval, directed somewhat outwards, covering most of the nasal scale; surrounded on either side by supralabial I, rostral, supranasals, and postnasals; a single row of smaller scales separate the orbit from the supralabials (Fig. 7E). Mental enlarged, triangular, wider (1.9 mm) than long (1.4 mm); two pairs of postmentals; inner pair in strong contact with each other, and longer than mental (2.2 mm); bordered by mental, infralabial I, outer postmental and two enlarged chin shields on either side; outer postmentals separated from each other by inner postmentals, roughly hexagonal and almost half the length (1.15 mm) of inner pair; bordered by inner postmentals, infralabial I and II, and three enlarged chin shields on either side; chin shields bordering postmentals and infralabials flat, smooth, smaller than outermost postmentals; rest flattened, even smaller, smooth; two or three rows of enlarged elongated scales separating gular scales from infralabials (Fig. 7D). Ten supralabials up to angle of jaw on left and eleven on right, and seven at midorbital position on each side (supralabial four divided into two scales on right); six infralabials up to angle of jaw on left and seven on right, and five infralabials at midorbital position on both sides (Fig. 7E).

Body relatively slender (BW/AGL 0.41), trunk less than half of SVL (AGL/SVL 0.45) without ventrolateral folds. Dorsal pholidosis on trunk homogeneous; covered with smooth, subcircular, weakly conical granular scales; 20 dorsal midbody scale rows across trunk contained within one eye diameter (Fig. 8A). Granular scales on occiput and nape slightly smaller than those on body dorsum; granular scales on flank slightly larger than those on dorsum. Ventral scales much larger than granular scales on dorsum, subequal from chest to vent, smooth, subcircular, and subimbricate with rounded end; 15 ventral scale rows at midbody contained within one eye diameter; 31 ventral midbody scale rows across belly (Fig. 8B). Scales on throat slightly smaller than those on belly; gular region with much smaller granular scales, those on chin bordering postmentals, enlarged, juxtaposed and flattened (Fig. 7D). No enlarged precloacal or femoral scales, no precloacal or femoral pores; no precloacal groove (Fig. 7B).

Scales on palm and soles granular, smooth, rounded to oval; scales on dorsal aspects of limbs heterogeneous in shape and size; mixture of small, granules similar to dorsum and many smooth flattened and subimbricate scales which are much larger than granules on the body dorsum, largest on anterior aspect of the hands and feet (Fig. 7A, B). Scales on ventral aspect of fore-limbs granular, slightly smaller than those on dorsal aspect; ventral aspect of thigh with scales similar to midbody ventrals except slightly smaller and gradually becoming even smaller and granular on posterior aspect; ventral aspect of shank with large, imbricate scales. Fore-limbs and hind-limbs slightly long, slender (LAL/SVL 0.15; CL/SVL 0.17); digits short, slender, with a strong, recurved claw, moderately inflected, distal portions laterally compressed. Series of unpaired lamellae on basal portion of digits except one or two which on some digits are paired, separated from narrower distal lamellae by a single large lamella at the inflection, unpaired except one or two which are divided; basal lamellae series: (3-6-5-6-4 right manus, Fig. 8C; 4-6-7-8-5 right pes, Fig. 8D), (3-7-6-6-4 left manus; 3-6-7-8-5 left pes); distal lamellae series: (8-8-10-9-9 right manus, Fig. 8C; 10-9-10-10-11 right pes, Fig. 8D), (5*-8-10-9-8 left manus; 11-10-11-10-11 left pes). Relative length of digits (measurements in mm in parentheses): III (3.0) > IV (2.7) > II (2.4) > V (2.0) > I (1.7) (right manus); III (4.2) > IV (3.8) > V (3.7) = II (3.5) > I (2.0) (right pes).

Tail original, circular in cross section with indistinct median dorsal furrow, relatively thick, tapering gradually to tip, unsegmented, slightly shorter than snout-vent length (TL/SVL 0.76). Scales on dorsal aspect of tail heterogenous, a few scattered enlarged, smooth to feebly keeled tubercles intermixed with much smaller and smooth granular scales, enlarged tubercles sometimes extend onto groin; scales on dorsal aspect of tail large flat, subcircular, smooth, and imbricate, becoming slightly larger towards lateral aspect, largest on ventral side, but not forming median row of transversely enlarged subcaudal scales. Small, smooth, subequal, conical postcloacal spurs, two on left and three on right side of tail base; prominent hemipenial swelling with barely everted hemipenis on either side, flap of skin covering cloacal aperture. Tail slightly constricted at the base (Fig. 7A, B).

Colouration in life.

Dorsal ground colour of body, head and limbs tan, five pairs of dark brown spots from behind nape to hindlimb insertions and a smaller pair above tail base; a row of four small spots between pairs three and four; all spots well separated mid-vertebrally except those on tail base just meeting; third pair of spots slightly larger than rest and fifth smallest and subequal to pair on tail base. Spots edged by black on the outer 2–5 rows of granules; ventrolateral portion of flanks with a few scattered and irregular black spots or blotches. Tail dorsum with eight dark brown black-edged crossbars following pair of spots on tail base; dorsum of limbs with scattered dark cross-bars and spots, digits with alternating dark brown bands. Post-occipital collar broken mid-vertebrally, composed of two elongate spots contiguous with parietal spots and separated from postorbital streak and broken interparietal streak. Crown sightly darker than trunk with dark brown markings that have a darker border flanked by a finer light border; a pre-frontal spot subequal in size to two interorbital spots which are broader and shorter than the longer part of the (broken) interparietal streak. Brille similar in colour to light scales on crown. Postocular streak runs from posterior edge of eye to beyond tympanum, separated from dorsolateral markings of collar and first pair of dorsal spots on neck; preocular streak extends till nostril. Labials with a few thick dark streaks, unmarked scales finely spotted with black. Ventral aspects dirty white with mottling under limbs and belly and fine spots along margin of belly, thick streaks and small spots on gular region, ventral aspect of tail dark with indistinct banding (Fig. 9A).

Variation and additional information from paratypes.

The subadult male SVL 34.0 mm and adult female SVL 53.4 mm paratypes resemble the holotype except for the following: inner postmental bordered by mental, infralabial I, outer postmental, and two enlarged chin scales on either side in NRC-AA-9670; in both paratypes – inner postmental bordered by mental, outer postmental, two enlarged chin scales on either side, and infralabial I on right and infralabial I and II on left side in NRC-AA-9671. Outer postmental bordered by inner postmentals on either side in both the paratypes; additionally, bordered by infralabial II and four chin scales on left and infralabial I and II and five on right side in NRC-AA-9671; and bordered by infralabial I and II, and four enlarged chin shields on either side in NRC-AA-9670. NRC-AA-9670 with original and complete tail, slightly shorter than body (TL/SVL 0.82); and NRC-AA-9671 with short and entirely regenerated tail (Fig. 10A, B). The two paratypes are generally similar in colouration and pattern to the holotype except that the post-occipital collar (spots) is separated from the parietal spots while the prefrontal and interorbital spots are fused in NRC-AA-9670 (Fig. 9B, C).

Distribution and Natural History.

Cyrtodactylus shenbagathoppuensis sp. nov. is only known from its type locality which has moist deciduous forest at elevations of 230–320 m asl. (Figs 1, 9E). All specimens were spotted on the ground in leaf-litter after dark, the type was found about two hours after sunset at the base of a large boulder.

The species has been previously observed in the months of March, April, and September (2020 and 2021), with most sightings soon after dark (~18:00–20:00 h) and as late as midnight (Satheeshkumar pers. obs.). These localities span an elevational range of ~150–600 m asl., and individuals were spotted on rocks, leaf litter and the long staircase leading up to the Shenbagathoppu Kaatalagar Temple. A dead individual was recorded from farmlands based on photographic evidence provided by a third-party observer.

Etymology.

The specific epithet is a toponym for the type locality of the new species, Shenbagathoppu, in Srivilliputhur-Megamalai Tiger Reserve, Virudhnagar District, Tamil Nadu. The Tamil name means Shenbaga = champaca [= Magnolia champaca (Linnaeus)] and Thoppu = grove. We suggest the common name Shenbagathoppu Geckoella.

Cyrtodactylus satpuraensis Agarwal, Thackeray, Gangalmale & Khandekar, sp. nov.

Figures 11, 12, 13, 14, Tables 6, 7

Cyrtodactylus nebulosusSharma (1976), Agarwal (2007), Sur et al. (2007)

Cyrtodactylus (Geckoella) cf. nebulosus 3 – Agarwal and Karanth (2015)

Holotype.

NRC-AA-9679 (IAG 081), adult male, from near Dongargaon (20.6323°N, 80.3651°E; ca. 280 m asl.), Gadchiroli District, Maharashtra, India, collected by Tarun Khichi, NS Achyuthan & Ishan Agarwal on 29th April 2015.

Figure 11. 

Cyrtodactylus (Geckoella) satpuraensis sp. nov. (holotype, NRC-AA-9679): A dorsal view of body, B ventral view of body, C dorsal view of head, D ventral view of head, and E right side lateral view of head. Scale bars 10 mm (A, B) and 5 mm (CE); photos by Akshay Khandekar.

Figure 12. 

Cyrtodactylus (Geckoella) satpuraensis sp. nov. (holotype, NRC-AA-9679): A dorsal view of midbody, B ventral view of midbody, C ventral view of left manus, D ventral view of left pes. Scale bars 5 mm; photos by Akshay Khandekar.

Figure 13. 

Colouration in life and habitat of Cyrtodactylus (Geckoella) satpuraensis sp. nov.: A holotype, male (NRC-AA-9679), B paratype, male (NRC-AA-9694), C paratype, female (NRC-AA-9693), D paratype, male (NRC-AA-9691), E paratype, female (NRC-AA-9688), F paratype, subadult female (NRC-AA-9685), and G general habitat at Toranmal, Dhule District, Maharashtra — the westernmost extent of the Satpuras. Photos by Ishan Agarwal.

Figure 14. 

Paratypes of Cyrtodactylus (Geckoella) satpuraensis sp. nov. from left to right, NRC-AA-9680–9694: A dorsal view, B ventral view. Scale bars 10 mm; photos by Akshay Khandekar.

Table 6.

Measurements (mm) data for the type series of Cyrtodactylus satpuraensis sp. nov. Abbreviations are listed in Materials and Methods except for * = tail incomplete or regenerated; M = male; F = female, SA = subadult.

Type Holotype Paratypes
Museum number NRC-AA-9679 NRC-AA-9680 NRC-AA-9681 NRC-AA-9682 NRC-AA-9683 NRC-AA-9684 NRC-AA-9685 NRC-AA-9686 NRC-AA-9687 NRC-AA-9688 NRC-AA-9689 NRC-AA-9690 NRC-AA-9691 NRC-AA-9692 NRC-AA-9693 NRC-AA-9694
Sex M M SA F M M M SA F M SA F F M M M M F M
SVL 43.7 53.5 38.6 43.5 52.3 46.2 36.9 47.4 38.2 49.3 48.4 50.7 41.5 51.5 48.3 52.3
TL 35.9 4.6* 24* 36.5 28.2* 39.4 27.3 32.5* 32.4 41.7 39.5 4.8* 37.5 43.5 38.9 40.0
TW 4.2 5.9 3.1 4.3 6.2 4.9 2.7 4.4 2.8 3.7 5.4 5.1 4.3 5.2 3.9 4.8
LAL 6.4 7.7 5.5 6.1 7.4 6.5 5.1 6.8 5.0 6.8 6.7 7.1 6.1 7.1 7.0 7.7
CL 7.9 9.4 7.1 7.6 8.8 7.9 6.0 8.1 6.3 8.1 8.5 8.6 7.2 8.2 8.1 8.6
AGL 18.3 21.8 15.1 17.7 20.3 19.6 17.4 20.5 16.1 23.0 21.0 22.2 16.6 21.9 20.8 22.3
BH 4.6 5.8 3.6 4.1 5.2 5.9 3.9 4.5 3.6 5.9 5.0 4.5 3.9 4.8 5.0 5.2
BW 9.1 10.1 6.5 7.9 10.2 10.6 6.1 7.7 6.3 9.2 9.5 10.1 7.9 9.1 7.7 8.7
HL 11.7 14.2 10.5 11.8 13.9 11.6 9.4 12.0 10.3 12.6 12.4 12.9 10.8 12.7 12.5 13.6
HW 8.2 9.1 7.3 8.1 9.6 8.6 6.7 9.1 7.5 9.4 8.8 10.0 8.0 10.4 9.3 9.3
HD 5.1 7.0 5.0 5.4 6.6 5.9 4.5 5.9 4.9 6.4 6.1 6.3 5.1 6.4 5.7 6.2
ED 2.5 3.3 2.5 2.7 3.2 2.7 2.3 3.4 2.4 2.8 2.9 3.1 2.5 2.9 2.7 3.1
EE 3.5 4.2 3.3 3.6 3.9 3.6 3.2 4.1 3.5 4.2 4.0 4.1 3.6 4.6 4.1 4.6
ES 5.1 6.3 4.6 5.0 6.1 5.2 4.3 5.3 4.5 5.5 5.4 5.6 4.7 5.7 5.3 5.7
EN 3.8 5.0 3.5 3.9 4.6 3.5 3.1 3.9 3.4 4.1 4.0 4.1 3.5 4.1 4.0 4.3
IN 1.5 2.0 1.6 1.8 2.0 1.5 1.4 1.8 1.4 1.9 1.8 1.7 1.5 1.9 1.8 1.9
IO 2.5 3.5 2.5 2.8 3.6 2.7 2.0 3.0 2.2 3.1 3.0 3.0 2.7 3.2 2.9 3.2
EL 1.1 1.7 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.3 0.9 1.8 1.0 1.2 1.1 1.1 0.8 1.1 1.4 0.9
Table 7.

Meristic data for the type series of Cyrtodactylus satpuraensis sp. nov. Abbreviations are listed in Materials and Methods except for A= absent, * = incomplete data; L&R = left and right; M = male; F = female, SA = subadult.

Type Holotype Paratypes
Museum number NRC-AA-9679 NRC-AA-9680 NRC-AA-9681 NRC-AA-9682 NRC-AA-9683 NRC-AA-9684 NRC-AA-9685 NRC-AA-9686 NRC-AA-9687 NRC-AA-9688 NRC-AA-9689 NRC-AA-9690 NRC-AA-9691 NRC-AA-9692 NRC-AA-9693 NRC-AA-9694
Sex M M SA F M M M SA F M SA F F M M M M F M
INS 1 2 1 1 A 1 1 A 1 1 A 1 1 1 1 1
SL L&R 13&13 12&13 13&13 11&12 11&12 12&13 13&13 11&12 12&13 12&12 14&13 12&&12 12&11 12&12 12&12 12&12
IL L&R 9&10 9&10 9&10 9&9 9&10 10&10 10&11 8&9 9&10 9&9 9&9 9&9 8&8 9&9 8&8 10&10
SL M L&R 7&7 6&7 7&7 6&7 6&7 7&7 8&7 6&6 6&8 6&6 6&6 6&6 7&6 6&7 7&8 6&6
IL M L&R 6&6 5&6 5&5 5&6 5&6 6&6 6&6 5&5 5&6 5&5 5&5 5&5 5&5 5&5 5&5 6&6
PVT 31&32 28&26 30&31 30&28 26&25 27&27 32&31 31&30 30&31 28&26 30&30 30&30 31&31 28&28 29&29 29&28
DTR 13 12 12 12 13 13 12 12 12 12 12 13 12 12 12 12
MVSRED 10 10 10 11 10 8 9 13 14 10 8 10 8 9 9 11
MVSR 38 39 40 36 40 39 38 40 37 33 35 40 34 40 35 38
VS1 46 46 47 46 48 48 51 46 50 46 45 45 50 44 44 46
VS2 145 139 142 132* 131 137 138 118* 141 130 128 129 143 124 126 136
DLAMF1 L&R 8&8 7&7 8&7 7&7 8&8 7&7 7&7 7&7 8&8 7&7 6&7 7&7 8&8 7&7 6&7 7&7
BLAMF1 L&R 4&4 4&4 4&3 3&4 4&4 4&4 3&3 3&2 5&5 4&4 4&3 3&3 4&4 4&3 4&5 3&3
DLAMF4 L&R 9&9 8&8 9&9 9&8 8&8 8&7 8&8 8&7 8&9 8&8 8&8 8&8 8&8 8&8 8&8 8&8
BLAMF4 L&R 6&5 6&6 6&6 5&6 5&5 5&4 5&5 6&6 6&6 6&6 5&5 5&5 5&5 5&5 5&5 6&5
DLAMT1 L&R 9&9 8&8 9&9 8&8 8&9 8&8 8&8 8&8 9&8 8&7 7&7 8&8 7&7 8&8 7&7 8&8
BLAMT1 L&R 3&3 4&5 3&4 3&3 4&3 3&3 3&3 3&2 3&3 4&4 3&4 3&3 3&3 4&3 2&2 3&3
DLAMT4 L&R 11&10 9&9 10&10 10&10 9&9 9&9 9&10 9&9 9&9 9&9 9&9 9&9 10&3* 9&9 9&9 9&9
BLAMT4 L&R 7&7 7&7 7&7 7&8 7&7 7&7 7&7 8&8 7&7 7&6 9&7 6&7 7&6 7&7 6&6 7&7
DLAMT5 L&R 11&11 10&10 11&11 10&11 11&11 10&10 10&11 11&11 11&11 10&10 10&10 10&10 10&10 9&10 10&10 11&11
BLAMT5 L&R 5&6 5&6 6&5 6&6 5&5 5&5 5&5 5&5 5&5 5&5 6&6 5&5 6&6 6&6 6&6 6&5
TLAMF1 L&R 12&12 11&11 12&10 10&11 12&12 11&11 10&10 10&9 13&13 11&11 10&10 10&10 12&12 11&10 10&12 10&10
TLAMF4 L&R 15&14 14&14 15&15 14&14 13&13 13&11 13&13 14&13 14&15 14&14 13&13 13&13 13&13 13&13 13&13 14&13
TLAMT1 L&R 12&12 12&13 12&13 11&11 12&12 11&11 11&11 11&10 12&11 12&11 10&11 11&11 10&10 12&11 9&9 11&11
TLAMT4 L&R 18&17 16&16 17&17 17&18 16&16 16&16 16&17 17&17 16&16 16&15 18&16 15&16 17&9* 16&16 15&15 16&16
TLAMT5 L&R 16&17 15&16 17&16 16&17 16&16 15&15 15&16 16&16 16&16 15&15 16&16 15&15 16&16 15&16 16&16 17&16
PCT L&R 2&2 2&2 2&2 4&2 2&2 4&2 2&2 3&2 2&2 2&2 2&2 2&1* 2&3 3&2 2&2 2&2

Paratypes.

NRC-AA-9681 (IAG 079), subadult female, NRC-AA-9682 (IAG 080), adult male, same locality and collection data as holotype; NRC-AA-9680 (IAG 064), adult male, from near Chikhaldara (21.4076°N, 77.2973°E; ca. 1080 m asl.), Amravati District, Ma­ha­rashtra, collected by Tarun Khichi, NS Achyuthan and Ishan Agarwal on 21th April 2015; NRC-AA-9688, adult female, NRC-AA-9683 (IAG 124), NRC-AA-9684 (IAG 125), NRC-AA-9689, NRC-AA-9690, NRC-AA-­9691, adult males, from near Kumhedin (23.4354°N, 81.8369°E; ca. 580 m asl.), Shahdol District, Madhya Pradesh, collected by Tarun Khichi, Ishan Agarwal and Akshay Khandekar on 06th May 2015; NRC-AA-9685, NRC-AA-9687, subadult females, NRC-AA-9686, adult male, from near Bhimlat (22.1276°N, 80.6892°E; ca. 570 m asl.), Balaghat District, Madhya Pradesh, collected by Ishan Agarwal, on 08th April 2015; NRC-AA-9692, adult male, CES09/1377 (tissue only) from near Chhawada (22.24073°N, 78.52270°E; ca. 980 m asl.), Chhindwara District, Madhya Pradesh, collected by Ishan Agarwal, on 12th April 2015; NRC-AA-9693, adult female, NRC-AA-9694, adult male, from Toranmal (21.8570°N, 74.4632°E; ca. 1030 m asl.), Nandurbar District, Maharashtra, collected by Ishan Agarwal and Sayana Pawara, on 04th April 2015.

Diagnosis.

A small-sized Cyrtodactylus (Geckoella), snout to vent length up to 53.5 mm (n = 16). Dorsal pholidosis heterogeneous; smooth granular scales intermixed with more or less regularly arranged rows of enlarged, feebly keeled, blunt to weakly conical tubercles; 12 or 13 rows of dorsal tubercles at midbody, 25–32 tubercles in paravertebral rows; ventral scales smooth, subcircular, and subimbricate with rounded end, subequal from chest to vent; 8–14 ventral scales at midbody contained within one eye diameter, 33–40 ventral scales across belly at midbody, 44–51 longitudinal scales between axilla to groin, 124–145 longitudinal scales from mental to cloaca; subdigital scansors smooth, unnotched, and mostly entire; 9–13 lamellae under digit I of manus and pes, 11–15 lamellae under digit IV of manus and 15–18 lamellae under digit IV of pes. 5–7 pairs of dark rounded blotches from nape to hindlimb insertions which may meet on the midline forming horizontal ‘8’ markings or uniform bands; post-occipital collar prominent except rarely separated on neck, postocular streak confluent with first pair of dorsal markings; no regular spots on flanks, darker markings cover > 50 % of dorsum between limb insertions. Ground colouration varied shades of brown; dorsal markings dark brown in center, edged with black on 1–3 rows of scales and light yellow on the posterior one or two rows.

Comparisons with members of the C. nebulosus complex.

The small body size and original tail shorter than SVL, besides the lack of femoral or precloacal pores in males, easily differentiate the new species from all other Cyrtodactylus, and its dorsal pholidosis of smooth granular scales intermixed with more or less regularly arranged rows of enlarged, feebly keeled, blunt to weakly conical tubercles from all Cyrtodactylus (Geckoella) apart from the C. nebulosus complex. Cyrtodactylus (Geckoella) satpuraensis sp. nov. can be differentiated by having 12 or 13 rows of dorsal tubercles at midbody (versus 16–18 rows of dorsal tubercles at midbody in C. teraiensis); 124–145 longitudinal scales from mental to cloaca (versus 150–157 in C. teraiensis); 33–40 (mean 37.6) ventral scales across belly at midbody (versus 30–32 in C. teraiensis); 5–7 pairs of dark blotches between neck and hindlimb insertions that may form broken or continuous bands, dark markings cover > 50 % of dorsum (versus 4–7 dark dorsal markings between neck and hindlimb insertions that vary from irregular paired blotches to cross-bars alternating with 1–3 small paired spots/ cross-bars that cover < 50 % of dorsum in C. nebulosus and four or five paired spots between neck and hindlimb insertions alternating with two or three much smaller paired spots that cover < 50 % of body dorsum in C. teraiensis); post-occipital collar extends to posterior margin of eye (versus post-occipital collar does not extend up to eye in C. teraiensis); post-orbital streak extends onto back and is confluent with first or first and second dorsal markings (versus post-orbital streak terminates before tympanum in C. teraiensis); pre-orbital streaks do not meet on internasals (versus pre-orbital streaks meet on internasals in C. teraiensis).

All three members of the C. nebulosus complex are well separated in PCA and C. satpuraensis sp. nov. is separated from C. nebulosus in a number of morphometric and some meristic characters and from C. teraiensis in LAL and a number of meristic characters (Fig. 2, Tables 3, 8).

Table 8.

Maximum SVL and selected colour pattern and meristic characters within the Cyrtodactylus collegalensis and C. nebulosus complexes. Data for C. yakhuna are from Deraniyagala (1945) and Somaweera and Somaweera (2009). Range is presented for meristic characters with mean in parentheses; abbreviations in Materials and Methods, except for A = absent.

Complex Species Dorsum banded/ spotted (B/S) Number of dark markings on dorsum Collar Max SVL DTR
collegalensis kalakadensis sp. nov. B 3 Contiguous/ notched/ pair of spots 55.0 A
shenbagathoppuensis sp. nov. S 5 or 6 Pair of spots 53.4 A
aravindi B/S 2/3 Band 44.7 A
chengodumalaensis S 4–6 Pair of spots 47.6 A
collegalensis S 3 Fused blotches/band 54.0 A
irulaorum S 5 Pair of spots just in contact 46.0 A
relictus S 4 Pair of spots/ fused 54.2 A
rishivalleyensis B 2 Band 52.8 A
speciosus B 2 Band 54.0 A
srilekhae S 3 Fused blotches/band 50.0 A
varadgirii S 4–6 Pair of spots 56.0 A
yakhuna B/S 1–3 Fused blotches/band 45.0 A
nebulosus satpuraensis sp. nov. S 5–7 Band (rarely separated) 53.5 12 or 13
nebulosus B/S 5–8 Band 52.2 12–14
teraiensis S 4 or 5 Band 45.5 16–18

Description of the holotype.

Adult male in good state of preservation except tail slightly bent towards left, and a 10.3 mm vertical incision in the sternal region for liver tissue collection (Fig. 11A, B). SVL 43.7 mm, head short (HL/SVL 0.27), wide (HW/ HL 0.70), not strongly depressed (HD/HL 0.43), slightly narrower than body (HW/BW 0.90), and distinct from neck (Fig. 11C–E). Loreal region slightly inflated, canthus rostralis not prominent. Snout less than half head length (ES/HL 0.43) and more than two times eye diameter (ES/ED 2.04); scales on snout, canthus rostralis, and loreal region large, hexagonal to subcircular, smooth and, flattened; much larger than granular scales on forehead and interorbital region; occipital and temporal region with heterogenous scalation consisting of much smaller, smooth granular scales intermixed with slightly enlarged, smooth, round tubercles (Fig. 11C, E). Eye small (ED/HL 0.21); pupil, dilated, vertical with crenulate margins; supraciliaries short, larger anteriorly, not elongate; 13 interorbital scale rows across narrowest point of frontal; 38 scale rows between left and right supraciliaries at mid-orbit (Fig. 11E). Ear-opening oval, small (EL/HL 0.09); eye to ear distance more than eye diameter (EE/ED 1.40). Rostral roughly 1.8 times wider (2.2 mm) than deep (1.2 mm), incompletely divided dorsally by weakly developed rostral groove for slightly more than half of its height; a single enlarged supranasal on each side, more than two times larger than the postnasals, separated from each other by a single enlarged internasal on the snout; three subequal postnasals, much smaller than supranasals; rostral in contact with nostril, supralabial I, supranasals, and internasals on either side; nostrils oval, directed somewhat outwards, covering most of the nasal scale; surrounded on either side by supralabial I, rostral, supranasals, and postnasals; a single row of smaller scales separate the orbit from the supralabials (Fig. 11C). Mental enlarged, rectangular, wider (1.7 mm) than long (1.3 mm); two pairs of postmentals; inner pair in strong contact with each other, roughly pentangular, and as long as mental is wide (1.7 mm length); bordered by mental, infralabial I, outer postmental, three chin scales on either side; outer postmentals separated from each other by inner postmentals, roughly rectangular and almost half the size (1.0 mm length) of inner pair; bordered by inner postmentals, infralabial I and II, and three enlarged chin shields on left and four on right; chin shields bordering postmentals and infralabials flat, smooth, smaller than outermost postmentals; rest flattened, even smaller, smooth; four rows of enlarged elongated scales separating gular scales from infralabials (Fig. 11D). Thirteen supralabials up to angle of jaw, and seven at midorbital position on each side; nine infralabials up to angle of jaw on left and 10 on right, and six infralabials at midorbital position on both sides (Fig. 11E).

Body relatively slender (BW/AGL 0.50), trunk less than half of SVL (AGL/SVL 0.42) without ventrolateral folds. Dorsal pholidosis on trunk heterogeneous; smooth granular scales intermixed with more or less regularly arranged rows of enlarged, feebly keeled, blunt to weakly conical tubercles; granular scales gradually increasing in size towards each flank, largest on mid-flank; granular scales on occiput slightly larger than paravertebral granular scales; enlarged tubercles in approximately 13 longitudinal rows at midbody; 31 (left) and 32 (right) tubercles in paravertebral rows (Fig. 12A). Ventral scales much larger than granular scales on dorsum, subequal from chest to vent, smooth, subcircular, and subimbricate with rounded end; 38 ventral midbody scale rows across belly (Fig. 12B). Scales on throat slightly smaller than those on belly; gular region with much smaller granular scales, those on chin bordering postmentals, enlarged, juxtaposed and flattened (Fig. 11D). No enlarged precloacal or femoral scales, no precloacal or femoral pores and no precloacal groove (Fig. 11B).

Scales on palm and soles granular, smooth, rounded to oval; scales on dorsal aspects of limbs heterogeneous in shape and size; mixture of small granules, similar to those on body dorsum and many smooth flattened and subimbricate scales on anterior aspects, largest on anterior aspect of the hands and feet; lateral and ventral aspects of fore-limbs with small granular scales; ventral aspect of thigh with scales similar to midbody ventrals except slightly smaller and gradually becoming even smaller and granular on posterior aspect; ventral aspect of shank with large, imbricate scales (Fig. 11A, B). Fore-limbs and hind-limbs slightly long, slender (LAL/SVL 0.15; CL/SVL 0.18); digits short, slender, with a strong, recurved claw, moderately inflected, distal portions laterally compressed. Series of unpaired lamellae on basal portion of digits except one or two which on some digits are paired, separated from narrower distal lamellae by a single large lamella at the inflection, unpaired except one or two which are divided; basal lamellae series: (4-6-7-5-5 right manus, Fig. 12C; 4-5-7-7-6 right pes, Fig. 12D), (4-6-6-6-6 left manus; 3-5-7-7-5 left pes); distal lamellae series: (8-8-10-9-7 right manus, Fig. 12C; 9-9-11-10-11 right pes, Fig. 12D), (8-8-10-9-8 left manus; 9-9-11-11-11 left pes). Relative length of digits (measurements in mm in parentheses): III (3.2) > IV (2.7) > II (2.5) > V (2.4) > I (1.8) (right manus); III (4.0) > IV (3.7) = V (3.7) > II (2.9) > I (2.3) (right pes).

Tail original, circular in cross section with indistinct median dorsal furrow, relatively thick, tapering gradually to tip, unsegmented, shorter than snout-vent length (TL/SVL 0.82). Scales on dorsal aspect of tail base similar to body dorsum; scales on dorsal aspect of tail large flat, subcircular, smooth, and imbricate, becoming slightly larger towards lateral aspect, largest on ventral side, but not forming median row of transversely enlarged subcaudal scales. Small, smooth, subequal (one on right distinctly larger), conical postcloacal spurs, two on either side of tail base; prominent hemipenial swelling with partially everted hemipenis on either side, flap of skin covering cloacal aperture. Tail slightly constricted at the base (Fig. 11A, B).

Colouration in life.

Dorsal ground colour khaki, four pairs of dark brown spots from behind occiput to hindlimb insertions and one pair above tail base, separated mid-vertebrally and extending onto lateral edge of body as streaks; roughly subequal, first spot and that on tail base smallest; spots with a fine black and finer outer cream border; lighter interspaces between spots less than thickness of spots. Tail dorsum sightly lighter than body dorsum with faint yellow tint; roughly seven dark crossbars on tail, last two light bands suffused with orange. Dorsum of limbs and digits with dark or grey reticulations. Post-occipital collar narrower than spots on dorsum, posteriorly darker with a fine light border, not in contact with post-orbital streak. Head dorsum slightly duller than trunk with irregular brown markings and a few scattered spots, a roughly V-shaped marking on snout-tip formed by pre-ocular streaks which do not meet in internasal region, prominent postocular streak merges with first pair of spots. Brille similar in colour to crown. Labials with few dark streaks, and a few unmarked scales finely spotted with black. Ventral aspects dirty white with numerous short streaks and spots on infralabials and gular region; ventral aspect of tail with thick dark reticulations and light markings that are less prominent on anterior half (Fig. 13A).

Variation and additional information from paratype.

There are 10 adult male, two adult and three subadult female paratypes, SVL ranging from 36.9–53.5 mm (Tables 6, 7). All paratypes resemble the holotype except for the following variation: inner postmental bordered by mental, infralabial I, outer postmental in all paratypes; additionally, bordered by two chin scale on left and three on right in NRC-AA-9680 and NRC-AA-9691, two chin scale on left and four on right in NRC-AA-9692, five chin scale on left and two on right in NRC-AA-9683; three chin scale on left and four on right in NRC-AA-9684; four chin scales on either side in NRC-AA-9687 and NRC-AA-9690; two chin scales on either side in NRC-AA-9689 and NRC-AA-9692. Outer postmental bordered by inner postmentals, infralabial I and II in all paratypes; additionally, boarded by four chin scales on left and three on right in NRC-AA-9680, NRC-AA-9682, and NRC-AA-9694; three chin scales on left and a single scale on right in NRC-AA-9681; three chin scales on either side in NRC-AA-9683, NRC-AA-9686, NRC-AA-9688, NRC-AA-9691, NRC-AA-9692, and NRC-AA-9693; four chin scales on left and two on right in NRC-AA-9684; two chin scales on left and three on right in NRC-AA-9685; three chin scales on left and two on right in NRC-AA-9681; three chin scales on left and four on right in NRC-AA-9689; and two chin scales on either side in NRC-AA-9690. Ten paratypes (NRC-AA-9682, NRC-AA-9684, NRC-AA-9685, NRC-AA-9687, NRC-AA-9688, NRC-AA-9689, NRC-AA-9692, NRC-AA-9693, and NRC-AA-9694) have an original and complete tail, slightly shorter than body except for NRC-AA-9691, which has marginally shorter tail than body (TL/SVL 0.84, 0.85, 0.74, 0.85, 0.85, 0.82, 0.90, 0.84, 0.80, and 0.76 respectively); NRC-AA-9681 with partially regenerated tail, much shorter than body (TL/SVL 0.62), NRC-AA-9683 and NRC-AA-9686 with fully regenerated tails, much shorter than body (TL/SVL 0.54 and 0.68 respectively), NRC-AA-9680 and NRC-AA-9690 without tail (Fig. 14A, B). The type series have 5–7 pairs of dark blotches between neck and hindlimb insertions that may form broken or continuous bands with variation in size and arrangement of dorsal spots and overall colouration (Figs 13B–F, 14A, 14B).

Distribution and Natural History.

Cyrtodactylus satpuraensis sp. nov. is known from multiple localities across the Satpura-Maikal landscape and lower elevations in eastern Maharashtra that span a maximum distance of > 770 km between elevations of ~270–1200 m in Madhya Pradesh and Maharashtra (Fig. 1). The species was observed in deciduous forest, with abundant leaf litter during summer, and most are at mid to high elevations (Fig. 13G). Cyrtodactylus satpuraensis sp. nov. was spotted emerging from under rocks or logs and crevices as darkness fell, on forest paths and in leaf litter after dark, and occasionally under rocks in the day. There are photographic records from Achanakmar-Amarkantak Biosphere Reserve, Anuppur District (Ingle 2020); Pachmarhi, Satpura Tiger Reserve, Hoshangabad District (IA pers. obs.), and Kanha Tiger Reserve, Mandla District (https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/238382363; https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/251979530); all from Madhya Pradesh; and it likely occurs in Pench Tiger Reserve (Agarwal 2007) and further east into Chhattisgarh.

Etymology.

The specific epithet is a toponym for the Satpura mountain range across which the new species is distributed. We suggest the common name Satpura Geckoella.

Discussion

Cyrtodactylus kalakadensis sp. nov. and C. shenbagathoppuensis sp. nov. are the 11th and 12th species of the Cyrtodactylus collegalensis complex and Cyrtodactylus satpuraensis sp. nov. the third of the Cyrtodactylus nebulosus complex, bringing the number of Geckoella from the dry-zone clade to one each from Sri Lanka and Nepal, and 13 from India. Two striking aspects of these new discoveries stand out — first is the fine-scale pattern of endemism seen in the Southern Western Ghats species and the relatively low mtDNA divergence seen between C. shenbagathoppuensis sp. nov. and its sister species C. aravindi; and second, the extremely low levels of divergence within C. satpuraensis sp. nov. across a vast geographic range (Figs 1, 2). The lowest uncorrected pairwise mtDNA divergence within described members of the C. collegalensis complex is between C. rishivalleyensis and C. srilekhae at 9.2 %, while it is just 3.7 % between the highly morphologically divergent sister pair C. shenbagathoppuensis sp. nov. and C. aravindi. Cyrtodactylus shenbagathoppuensis sp. nov. is known only from its type locality on the eastern slopes of the Western Ghats and has a spotted dorsal pattern and a maximum SVL of 53.4 mm, the latter is relatively widely distributed on the western and eastern slopes at the extreme southern end of the Western Ghats and has a banded dorsum and a maximum SVL of 48.0 mm. The only known species from the ~ 130–150 km between the range of these two species is the spotted species C. kalakadensis sp. nov. which has been recorded within ~14 km of C. aravindi.

The new species from central India has an intriguing distribution, with almost no divergence (≤ 0.3 %) across a vast landscape with localities as far apart as 780 km and spanning 2.79° latitude and 7.36° longitude (Fig. 1). There are endemic gekkonids in the intervening areas (e.g., Hemidactylus chikhaldaraensis Agarwal, Bauer, Giri & Khandekar, 2019 and H. chipkali Mirza & Raju, 2017 as well as other ‘brookiish’ geckos (Agarwal and Khandekar unpubl. data) (Mirza and Raju 2017; Agarwal et al. 2019a). Cyrtodactylus varadgirii of the C. collega­lensis complex shows a similar pattern to C. satpuraensis sp. nov. in that there is zero mtDNA divergence between localities in western and central India about 680 km apart – except the former species has a patchy distribution, does not seem restricted to forest, and there is ~ 1 % mtDNA divergence between some samples from western portions of its range (Agarwal et al. 2016). Geckoella are a cool-adapted group and are restricted to relatively cool habitats in the tropics of peninsular India and Sri Lanka with a single species recently discovered from the subtropics of Nepal (Agarwal and Karanth 2015; Gautam et al. 2026). The northern distributional ranges of C. satpuraensis sp. nov. and C. varadgirii together form the northern distributional limit of Geckoella in peninsular India (Agarwal et al. 2016), and the central Indian habitats the species are found in have a more continental climate due to their greater distance from the ocean and proximity to the Tropic of Cancer. It is likely that Pleistocene climatic fluctuations made conditions unsuitable for Geckoella in central India with a rapid range expansion when conditions became favourable again (Agarwal et al. 2016), but finer geographic and genomic sampling are required in conjunction with paleoclimatic data to understand these patterns.

Can flagship species adequately protect biodiversity?

Flagship species are charismatic species that are used to attract funding and garner support from or bring awareness to the general public, the endeavour being the protection of the ecosystems they inhabit and general biodiversity as a consequence – though that is usually not the case (e.g., Andelman and Fagan 2000). The protected area network in India covers ~5 % of land area, and was not set up to maximize biodiversity conservation but is largely focussed on charismatic megafauna — with schemes such as Project Tiger and Project Elephant getting the maximum protected area (PA; Tiger Reserve, National Park or Wildlife Sanctuary under Indian law) coverage, funding, and conservation attention; with even more poorly thought out single-species schemes like Project Cheetah impacting both natural and human ecosystems (Gopalaswamy et al. 2022; Wachter et al. 2023; Joshi et al. 2025). The tiger, Panthera tigris (Linnaeus, 1758) is the most charismatic species in the world (Albert et al. 2018) and in India is the main target of conservation efforts. These new discoveries are from important tiger conservation landscapes — central India and the Southern Western Ghats (Kolipakam et al. 2019; Qureshi et al. 2023) and all three new species were found in Tiger Reserves. Though there are still trickle-down effects for overall biodiversity when utilizing the flagship/ umbrella species approach (Simberloff 1998) — conserving maximum biodiversity requires scientific planning and urgent survey effort across the country to lay a baseline understanding of what biodiversity we have and where it is distributed. For example, the vast central Indian landscape has low overall biodiversity but is key for tiger conservation, while in contrast there are lower overall tiger numbers in the Southern Western Ghats but incredibly high biodiversity (Qureshi et al. 2023). Additionally, numerous Reserve Forests (a lower category of protection than PAs under Indian law) that are home to endemic species and several groups with a high proportion of endemic species are not represented in the traditional megafauna-centric approach (e.g., numerous members of the gekkonid species complexes Cyrtodactylus collega­lensis, Cnemaspis gracilis (Beddome, 1870), Cnemaspis bangara Agarwal, Thackeray, Pal & Khandekar, 2020, Cnemaspis mysoriensis (Jerdon, 1853), and Hemiphyllodactylus aurantiacus (Beddome, 1870); species of the scincid Dravidoseps Agarwal, Thackeray & Khandekar, 2024) (Agarwal 2016; Agarwal et al. 2016, 2019b, 2020, 2024; Khandekar et al. 2020). Maximizing biodiversity conservation requires addressing gaps in knowledge on species diversity and distribution and prioritising the natural world in the most populous and one of the most biodiverse countries in the world.

Acknowledgements

For permits and logistic support, we thank the Forest Departments of Madhya Pradesh (permit no. Technical-1/ 7313), Maharashtra [permit no. D-22(8)/WL/Research/CR-939/ 4388/ 2014-15] and Tamil Nadu (permit no. 53/2018). Fieldwork assistance was provided by Aniruddha Datta-Roy, Tarun Khichi, Swapnil Pawar, Achyutan Srikanthan, Sayana Pawara, Chittaranjan Dave and Vivek Waghe. Pritha Dey and Tarun Karmakar (NCBS Research Collection Facility, Bengaluru) helped with specimen registration. Praveen Karanth and Uma Ramakrishnan provided lab support and partial funding for fieldwork (Department of Science & Technology grant SR/SO/AS–57/2009; 2012/21/06/BRNS). Gopal Murali shared photographs of C. shenbagathoppuensis sp. nov. in August 2012.

References

  • Agarwal I (2007) A report of Geckoella nebulosus (Beddome, 1870) from Seoni district, Madhya Pradesh. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society 104: 24–25.
  • Agarwal I, Bauer AM, Giri VB, Khandekar A (2019a) An expanded ND2 phylogeny of the brookii and prashadi groups with the description of three new Indian Hemidactylus Oken (Squamata: Gekkonidae). Zootaxa 4619: 431–458. https://doi.org/10.11646/zoo­taxa.4619.3.2
  • Agarwal I, Karanth KP (2015) A phylogeny of the only ground-dwelling radiation of Cyrtodactylus (Squamata, Gekkonidae): Diversification of Geckoella across peninsular India and Sri Lanka. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 82: 193–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2014.09.016
  • Agarwal I, Khandekar A, Giri VB, Ramakrishnan U, Karanth KP (2019b) The hills are alive with geckos! A radiation of a dozen species on sky islands across peninsular India (Squamata: Gekkonidae, Hemiphyllodactylus) with the description of three new species. Organisms, Diversity & Evolution 19: 341–361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13127-019-00392-5
  • Agarwal I, Mirza ZA, Pal S, Maddock ST, Mishra A, Bauer AM (2016) A new species of the Cyrtodactylus (Geckoella) collegalensis (Beddome, 1870) complex (Squamata: Gekkonidae) from Western India. Zootaxa 4170: 339–354. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4170.2.7
  • Agarwal I, Thackeray T, Khandekar A (2023a) Two new spotted species of the Cyrtodactylus (Geckoella) collegalensis (Beddome, 1870) complex from the south-eastern coast of India (Reptilia: Squamata). Vertebrate Zoology 73: 475–498. https://doi.org/10.3897/vz.73.e102602
  • Agarwal I, Thackeray T, Khandekar A (2024) A non-adaptive radiation of viviparous skinks from the seasonal tropics of India: Systematics of Subdoluseps (Squamata: Scincidae), with description of a new genus and five cryptic new species. Vertebrate Zoology 74: 23–83. https://doi.org/10.3897/vz.74.e110674
  • Agarwal I, Thackeray T, Pal S, Khandekar A (2020) Granite boulders act as deep-time climate refugia: A Miocene divergent clade of rupicolous Cnemaspis Strauch, 1887 (Squamata: Gekkonidae) from the Mysore Plateau, India, with descriptions of three new species. Journal of Zoological Systematics & Evolutionary Research 8: 1234–1261. https://doi.org/10.1111/jzs.12391
  • Agarwal I, Umesh PK, Das S, Bauer AM, Khandekar A (2023b) A new spotted species of the Cyrtodactylus (Geckoella) collegalensis (Beddome, 1870) (Reptilia, Squamata) complex from coastal Kerala, southwestern India. Journal of Herpetology 57: 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1670/21-075
  • Amarasinghe TAA, Karunarathna S, Campbell PD, Gayan AKA, Ranasinghe WDB, De Silva A, Mirza ZA (2022) The hidden diversity and inland radiation of Sri Lanka’s ground-dwelling geckos of the genus Cyrtodactylus (Reptilia: Gekkonidae). Systematics and Biodiversity 20: 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/14772000.2022.2039319
  • Andelman SJ, Fagan WF (2000) Umbrellas and flagships: Efficient conservation surrogates or expensive mistakes? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 97: 5954–5959. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.100126797
  • Beddome RH (1870) Descriptions of some new lizards from the Madras Presidency. Madras Monthly Journal of Medical Science 1: 30–35.
  • Deraniyagala PEP (1945) A new gymnodactylid gecko from Ceylon. Spolia Zeylanica 24: 99–102.
  • Edler D, Klein J, Antonelli A, Silvestro D (2020) raxmlGUI 2.0: A graphical interface and toolkit for phylogenetic analyses using RAxML. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 12: 373–377. http://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13512
  • Gautam B, Bhattarai S, Neupane BP, Pokheral CP, Thackeray T, Khandekar A, Cyriac VP, Agarwal I (2026) Middle Miocene biogeographic connectivity between the Eastern Ghats and Nepal revealed by a new species of the Cyrtodactylus (Geckoella) nebulosus complex (Reptilia: Squamata) from Nepal. ZooKeys 1275: 15–42. http://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1275.178507
  • Gopalaswamy, AM, Khalatbari L, Chellam R, Mills MG, Vanak AT, Thuo D, Karanth KU Broekhuis F (2022) Introducing African cheetahs to India is an ill-advised conservation attempt. Nature Ecology & Evolution 6: 1794–1795. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-022-01922-9
  • Grismer LL, Wood PL Jr, Le MD, Quah ESH, Grismer JL (2020) Evolution of habitat preference in 243 species of Bent-toed geckos (Genus Cyrtodactylus Gray, 1827) with a discussion of karst habitat conservation. Ecology and Evolution 10: 13717–13730. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6961
  • Grismer LL, Wood PL Jr, Poyarkov NA, Le MD, Kraus F, Agarwal I, Oliver PM, Nguyen SN, Nguyen TQ, Karunarathna S, Welton LJ, Stuart BL, Luu VQ, Bauer AM, O’Connell KA, Quah ESH, Chan KO, Ziegler T, Ngo H, Nazarov RA, Aowphol A, Chomdej S, Suwannapoom C, Siler CD, Anuar S, Tri NV, Grismer JL (2021) Phylogenetic partitioning of the third-largest vertebrate genus in the world, Cyrtodactylus Gray, 1827 (Reptilia: Squamata: Gekkonidae) and its relevance to taxonomy and conservation. Vertebrate Zoology 71: 101–154. https://doi.org/10.3897/vz.71.e59307
  • Ingle M (2020) Herpetofauna of the Amarkantak Plateau in central India. Reptiles & Amphibians 27: 397–410.
  • Joshi YC, Klarmann SE, de Waal LC (2025) Delineating the environmental justice implications of an experimental cheetah introduction project in India. Frontiers in Conservation Science 6: 1511815. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcosc.2025.1511815
  • Kalyaanamoorthy S, Minh BQ, Wong TKF, von Haeseler A, Jermiin LS (2017) ModelFinder: Fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nature Methods 14: 587–589. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4285
  • Kapli P, Lutteropp S, Zhang J, Kobert K, Pavlidis P, Stamatakis A, Flouri T (2017) Multi rate Poisson tree processes for single-locus species delimitation under maximum likelihood and Markov chain Monte Carlo. Bioinformatics 33: 1630–1638. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btx025
  • Khandekar A, Thackeray T, Agarwal I (2020) A new cryptic Cnemaspis Strauch (Squamata: Gekkonidae) from an isolated granite hill on the Mysore Plateau, Karnataka, India. Zootaxa 4845: 509–528. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4845.4.3
  • Kolipakam V, Singh S, Pant B, Qureshi Q, Jhala YV (2019) Genetic structure of tigers (Panthera tigris tigris) in India and its implications for conservation. Global Ecology and Conservation 20: p.e00710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00710
  • Lanfear R, Calcott B, Ho SYW, Guindon S (2012) Partitionfinder: Combined selection of partitioning schemes and substitution models for phylogenetic analysis. Molecular Biology and Evolution 29: 1695–1701. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mss020
  • Macey JR, Larson A, Ananjeva NB, Fang Z, Papenfuss TJ (1997) Two novel gene orders and the role of light-strand replication in rearrangement of the vertebrate mitochondrial genome. Molecular Biology and Evolution 14: 91–104. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025706
  • Mirza ZA, Pal S, Sanap RV (2010) Notes on a ground gecko Geckoella cf. collegalensis Beddome, 1870 (Squamata, Sauria, Gekkonidae) from India. Russian Journal of Herpetology 17: 8–14.
  • Mirza ZA, Raju D (2017) A new rupicolous species of gecko of the genus Hemidactylus Oken, 1817 from the Satpura Hills, central India. Amphibian & Reptile Conservation 11: 51–71 (e137).
  • Narayanan S, Das S, Balan A, Tom R, Divakar N, Rajkumar KP, Hopeland P, Deepak V (2022) A new species of Cyrtodactylus (Reptilia: Gekkonidae) from the southern Western Ghats of India. Vertebrate Zoology 72: 729–743. https://doi.org/10.3897/vz.72.e89660
  • Nguyen L, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ (2015) IQ-TREE: A fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum likelihood phylogenies. Molecular Biology and Evolution 32: 268–274. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msu300
  • Qureshi Q, Jhala YV, Yadav SP, Mallick A (Eds) (2023) Status of Tigers in India – 2022: Photo-captured Tigers, Summary Report. National Tiger Conservation Authority and Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun, TR. No./2023/03.
  • R Core Team (2022) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna.
  • Sharma RC (1976) Three new records of reptiles from Madhya Pradesh, India. Newsletter Zoological Survey of India 2: 101–102.
  • Smith MA (1935) The Fauna of British India, including Ceylon and Burma; Reptilia and Amphibia. Vol. II. Sauria. Taylor and Francis, London, xiii, 440 pp.
  • Somaweera R, Somaweera N (2009) Lizards of Sri Lanka: A Colour Guide with Field Keys. Edition Chimaira, Frankfurt am Main, 304 pp.
  • Sur S, Gayen NC, Raha S (2007) Reptilia. In: Director, Zoological Survey of India (Ed.) Fauna of Madhya Pradesh (including Chhattisgarh). State Fauna Series, 15. Part 1. Zoological Survey of India, Kolkata, India, 79−111.
  • Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S (2011) MEGA5: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Molecular Biology and Evolution 28: 2731–2739. http://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msr121
  • Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ (1994) CLUSTAL W: Improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, positions-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids and Research 22: 4673–4680. http://doi.org/10.1093/nar/22.22.4673
  • Trifinopoulos J, Nguyen L-T, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ (2016) W-IQTREE: A fast online phylogenetic tool for maximum likelihood analysis. Nucleic Acids Research 44: W232–W235. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw256
  • Wachter B, Portas R, Melzheimer J (2023) The introduction of African cheetahs to India was planned without considering their spatial ecology. Conservation Science and Practice 5: e12943. https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.12943
  • Wood PL, Heinicke MP, Jackman TR, Bauer AM (2012) Phylogeny of bent-toed geckos (Cyrtodactylus) reveals a west to east pattern of diversification. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 65: 992–1003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2012.08.025

Appendix 1

Material examined.

Cyrtodactylus (Geckoella) collegalensis complex

Cyrtodactylus (Geckoella) aravindi: AK-R 682, AK-R 683, AK-R 1007– AK-R 1011, adult males and females, from Thirukurungudi, Tirunelveli District, Tamil Nadu, India. Cyrtodactylus (Gecko­ella) chengodumalaensis: holotype, NRCAA-1161, adult male, from Kumaragiri Estate, Malappuram District, Kerala, India; paratypes; BNHS 2812, BNHS 2816, BNHS 2817, adult males, NRC-AA-1162, NRC-AA-1163, NRC AA-1166, adult females, BNHS 2813, subadult female, all from Kerala, India.

Cyrtodactylus (Geckoella) collegalensis: holotype, BMNH 1946.8.25.28, adult male, from near BR Hills, CES09/1444, subadult male and CES09/1463, adult female, from near MM Hills; all from Chamarajanagar District, Karnataka, India.

Cyrtodactylus (Geckoella) irulaorum: holotype, NRC-AA-1266, adult male, from a farm near Vallam Reserve Forest, Kancheepuram District, Tamil Nadu, India; paratypes; NRC-AA-1267, NRC-AA-1268, NRC-AA-1269, NRC-AA-1270, adult males, NRC-AA-1272, NRCAA-1273, adult females, same collection data as holotype; NRC-AA-1271 (IAG 193), adult female, from Thervoy Kandigai, Tiruvallur District, Tamil Nadu, India.

Cyrtodactylus (Geckoella) relictus: holotype, NRC-AA-1274, adult male, from near Ubbalamadagu waterfalls, Kambakkam Durg, Tirupati District, Andhra Pradesh, India; paratypes; NRC-AA-1275, NRC-AA-1276, adult females, from near Penchalakona, Nellore District, Andhra Pradesh, India.

Cyrtodactylus (Geckoella) speciosus: AK-R 2689–2693, adult males and females, from near Erode, Erode District, Tamil Nadu, India.

Cyrtodactylus cf. speciosus: CES09/1405–1408, from near Coimbatore, Coimbatore District, Tamil Nadu, India.

Cyrtodactylus (Geckoella) srilekhae: holotype, NCBS AQ740, adult male, near Thathaguni, Bangalore Urban District; paratypes, ESV 101, adult male, BNHS 2325, NCBS AQ427, adult females, same data as holotype; ESV 102, adult male, from Nandi Hills, Chikkaballapur District; NCBS AQ510, juvenile, Savandurga, Ramanagara District, Karnataka, India. Cyrtodactylus (Geckoella) rishivalleyensis: holotype, NCBS AQ742, adult female, Horsley Hills, Chittoor District, Andhra Pradesh; paratypes; NCBS AQ744, NCBS AQ743, adult males, ESV 103, BNHS 2326, adult females, ESV 104 juvenile, same locality as holotype.

Cyrtodactylus (Geckoella) varadgirii: holotype, NCBS AQ475, adult male, from Ulhasnagar, Thane District, Maharashtra, India; paratypes, NCBS AQ191, adult male, same locality as holotype; CES09/1381, adult male, from Chikhli, Navsari District, Gujarat; CES/09/1368, adult male, Chandrapur District, Maharashtra; CES09/1536, adult male and CES09/1537, adult female, from Amravati District, Maharashtra; BNHS 1427, adult male from Sanjay Gandhi National Park, Mumbai, Thane and Mumbai Suburban Districts, Maharashtra, BNHS 1434, subadult male, from Junagadh District, Gujarat; NCBS AQ192, adult male, BNHS 1848, adult male, and BNHS 1849, adult female, BNHS 1929, subadult female, from Aarey Milk Colony, Mumbai, Mumbai Suburban District, Maharashtra; BNHS 2099; adult female, from Vansda National Park, Navsari District, Gujarat, India.

Cyrtodactylus (Geckoella) nebulosus complex

Cyrtodactylus (Geckoella) nebulosus: lectotype, BNHM 1946.9.7.51-54a, female, “Golcondah hills near Vizagapatam [=Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh]; paralectotypes, BNHM 1946.9.7.51-54b–d; same collection data as lectotype; additional material, NRC-AA-9618, NRC-AA-9626, NRC-AA-9628, NRC-AA-9629, adult males and NRC-AA-9616, NRC-AA-9617, NRC-AA-9619, NRC-AA-9620, NRC-AA-9621, NRC-AA-9622, NRC-AA-9623, NRC-AA-9624, NRC-AA-9625, NRC-AA-9627, adult females, from Alluri Sitharama Raju District, Andhra Pradesh State, India.

Cyrtodactylus (Geckoella) teraiensis: holotype, NHM 2025/390, adult male, collected from Belbari Chisang Collaborative Forest, Bhaunne, Morang District, Koshi Province, Nepal; paratype, NHM 2025/391, adult male, same locality data as holotype.

login to comment