Review Article |
Corresponding author: Thaís B. Guedes ( thaisbguedes@yahoo.com.br ) Academic editor: Uwe Fritz
© 2022 Lucas Rafael Uchôa, Fagner Ribeiro Delfim, Daniel Oliveira Mesquita, Guarino Rinaldi Colli, Adrian Antonio Garda, Thaís B. Guedes.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Uchôa LR, Delfim FR, Mesquita DO, Colli GR, Garda AA, Guedes TB (2022) Lizards (Reptilia: Squamata) from the Caatinga, northeastern Brazil: Detailed and updated overview. Vertebrate Zoology 72: 599-659. https://doi.org/10.3897/vz.72.e78828
|
Abstract
The Caatinga is the largest seasonal dry tropical forest in South America and it has been historically neglected in terms of its biodiversity. Regarding lizards, different studies led to the current knowledge of diversity and endemism in Caatinga, but detailed syntheses are scarce in the literature. We present the most detailed and up-to-date synthesis of knowledge about Caatinga lizards by providing a detailed (i) list of species; (ii) taxonomic richness patterns; (iii) knowledge gaps and spatial biases; and (iv) detailed distribution maps of all species that contain at least one occurrence record within Caatinga limits. We created a distribution database using occurrences of lizards in Caatinga based on scientific collections, field collection, and literature. We produce up-to-date distribution maps, calculate the Extent of Occurrence and provide the environmental and bioclimatic profile for each species recorded. We draw taxonomic richness and sampling gap maps. Our database has 20,538 records of occurrence of lizards of the Caatinga. We recorded 93 lizard species (13 families), 52.7% of which are endemic. Forthy-four percent of the species present restricted distributions. We identified that 53% of the Caatinga area (or 70% of the municipalities) has no record of occurrence of lizards. The data presented are an important step towards synthesizing in detail the accumulated knowledge about Caatinga lizards and is crucial for accurate strategies for the conservation planning. It directs actions to advance our knowledge on Caatinga lizards: to concentrate inventories in sample void areas; continuous update of the species occurrence database, advance in the generation of autoecology data for species.
Endemism, geographic distribution, Neotropical, sampling gaps, species composition, taxonomic richness
The Neotropical region presents extraordinary levels of biological diversity, accumulating about 70% of known species of the planet, and harboring six out of the 25 world’s biodiversity hotspots (
More than half of the Neotropics’ land surface consists of rangelands (
Lizard studies underpinned much of the knowledge on the diversity and endemism of Caatinga reptiles and guided the first recommendations of conservation priority areas for the region (e.g.,
Systematic data collection of the lizard fauna has efficiently contributed to demonstrate the biological value of the Caatinga (e.g.,
Here, we present the most detailed and up-to-date synthesis of knowledge on Caatinga lizards. We provide (i) a detailed species list, (ii) taxonomic richness patterns, (iii) information on sampling gaps and spatial biases in knowledge, and (iv) detailed distribution maps of all species with at least one occurrence record within the Caatinga boundaries. Based on this information, we discuss the status of knowledge, priorities for future surveys, and conservation strategies for the lizards and the Caatinga.
The Caatinga (Fig.
Caatinga map showing the geographic location and coverage of the study area, northeast of Brazil and phytophysiognomies of the Caatinga ecoregions (following
We compiled a database using primary data obtained from biological collections and fieldwork conducted in the Caatinga, complemented with data from public databases and literature. We examined lizard specimens in the following biological collections: Coleção Herpetológica da Universidade Federal de Sergipe, Museu de História Natural da Universidade Federal de Alagoas, Coleção Herpetológica da Universidade Federal da Paraíba, Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de São Paulo, Museu Nacional da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Coleção Herpetológica da Universidade Federal do Ceará, Coleção Herpetológica da Universidade de Brasília. Additionally, curators provided good quality data on lizards occurrences in the Caatinga for the following biological collections: Museu de Zoologia da Universidade Federal da Bahia, Museu de Zoologia da Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana, Museu de Zoologia da Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Laboratório de Herpetologia da Universidade Federal de Campina Grande, Museu de Biologia Professor Melo Leitão do Instituto Nacional da Mata Atlântica and Coleção Biológica do Instituto Federal de Pedro II. Field data came from 18 surveys conducted in 19 municipalities (six states) within the Caatinga range: Paulo Afonso (Bahia State); district of Daniel de Queiroz in Quixadá, Santa Quitéria, São Gonçalo do Amarante, and district Várzea da Conceição in Cedro (Ceará State); Areia (Paraíba State); Arcoverde, Araripina, Trindade, and Serra Talhada (Pernambuco State); Paulistana, Pavussu, Rio Grande do Piauí, Redenção do Gurguéia, Pedro II, and São Francisco de Assis do Piauí (Piauí State); and Canindé do São Francisco, Poço Redondo, and Nossa Senhora da Glória (Sergipe State). We complement our database by including data from Museu de Zoologia da Universidade Estadual de Campinas accessed through Sistema de Informações Distribuído para Coleções Biológicas (Species Link: http://splink.cria.org.br), and by including several published papers (taxonomic, surveys, ecological and evolutionary studies) that provided the location of collection and vouchered specimens (e.g.,
We georeferenced the location information associated with specimens deposited in scientific collections and those obtained from the literature. For the fieldwork data, we obtained the coordinates of the collection site. We followed
We produced distribution maps and calculated the extent of occurrence (EOO) of each species. The EOO was calculated using the minimum convex polygon (MCP) method, which consists of drawing a polygon containing all records of occurrence of a species and whose internal angles do not exceed 180° (
We used elevation range, mean annual temperature, and mean annual precipitation to characterize the environmental profile for each lizard species. For this, we downloaded the variables “Annual Mean Temperature” (BIO 1), Annual Precipitation (BIO 12), and “Altitude” from the WorldClim database (https://www.worldclim.org;
We produced a taxonomic richness pattern map containing the number of species in the Caatinga municipalities. We also prepared a sampling map containing the number of lizard occurrences in the Caatinga municipalities. We used QGIS software version 3.10 (
We assembled a database with 20,538 lizard occurrences within the Caatinga, of which 5,817 (28.4%) are primary data from biological collections and fieldwork (Appendix S1 in Supplementary Material), and 14,721 (71.6%) are secondary data from the literature (Appendix S2).
We recorded 93 species of lizards from 13 families distributed in the Caatinga (Table
Lizards from the Caatinga. Summarized data about distribution, ecology, and conservation. Caatinga ecoregions (
Taxa | Caatinga Ecorregions | Distribution Pattern |
Habitat | Preferred habitat type | Activity | Conservation status (IUCN/ICMBio) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dactyloidae | ||||||
Norops brasiliensis (Vanzolini & Williams, 1970) | CIA, SFG | R | O | TB | D | LC, LC |
Norops fuscoauratus (D’Orbigny, 1837 in Duméril & Bibron, 1837) | B, CIA, DSM, DSS, PB | WD | F | TB | D | LC, LC |
Diploglossidae | ||||||
Diploglossus lessonae Peracca, 1890 | B, CCD, CIA, DSM, DSS, PB, RC | WD | O | LL | D | LC, LC |
Ophiodes striatus (Spix, 1825) | CCD, CIA, SFG | WD | O | LL | D | LC, DD |
Ophiodes sp. 2 | CIA, DSM, PB | WD | O | D | NE, NE | |
Gekkonidae | ||||||
Hemidactylus agrius* Vanzolini, 1978 | CIA, DSM, DSS, PB | WD | O, F | G | N | LC, LC |
Hemidactylus brasilianus (Amaral, 1935) | CCD, CIA, DSF, DSM, DSS, PB, RC, SFG | WD | O, F | G | N/C | LC, LC |
Hemidactylus mabouia (Moreau de Jonnès, 1818) | all ecoregions | WD | O, F | G/A | N | NE, NE |
Lygodactylus klugei (Smith, Martin & Swain, 1977) | CCD, CIA, DSF, DSM, DSS, PB, RC, SFG | WD | O, F | TB | D | LC, LC |
Lygodactylus sp. 1* | DSM | R | O | D | NE, NE | |
Lygodactylus sp. 2* | DSM | R | O | D | NE, NE | |
Gymnophthalmidae | ||||||
Acratosaura mentalis* (Amaral, 1933) | CCD, DSM, DSS, PB, RC, SFG | WD | O | LL | D | LC, LC |
Acratosaura spinosa* Rodrigues, Cassimiro, Freitas & Silva, 2009 | CCD | R | O | LL | D | NE, DD |
Anotosaura collaris* Amaral, 1933 | CCD | R | O | LL | D | LC, DD |
Anotosaura vanzolinia* Dixon, 1974 | DSM, DSS, PB, RC | WD | F | LL | D | LC, LC |
Calyptommatus confusionibus* Rodrigues, Zaher & Curcio, 2001 | CIA, SFG | R | O | P | N | LC, LC |
Calyptommatus frontalis* Recoder, Marques-Souza, Silva-Soares, Ramiro, Castro & Rodrigues, 2022 | SFG | R | O | P | N | NE, NE |
Calyptommatus leiolepis* Rodrigues, 1991 | DSF, DSM | R | O | P | N | NE, EN |
Calyptommatus nicterus* Rodrigues, 1991 | DSF, DSM, SFG | R | O | P | N | NE, EN |
Calyptommatus sinebrachiatus* Rodrigues, 1991 | DSM, SFG | R | O | P | N | NE, EN |
Calyptommatus sp. 1* | DSF | R | O | P | N | NE, NE |
Calyptommatus sp. 2* | DSF | R | O | P | N | NE, NE |
Cercosaura olivacea (Gray, 1845) | CCD, CIA, DSF, DSM, DSS, PB, SFG | WD | O | ? | D | NE, NE |
Colobosaura modesta (Reinhardt & Luetken, 1862) | CIA, DSM, DSS, SFG | WD | O | LL | D | NE, LC |
Colobosauroides carvalhoi* Soares & Caramaschi, 1998 | CIA, DSM, SFG | WD | F | LL | D | NE, DD |
Colobosauroides cearensis* Cunha, Lima-Verde & Lima, 1991 | B, CIA, DSS, | WD | F | LL | D | LC, LC |
Dryadosaura nordestina Rodrigues, Freire, Pellegrino & Sites, 2005 | DSM, DSS, PB | WD | F | LL | D | LC, LC |
Heterodactylus septentrionalis* Rodrigues, Freitas & Silva, 2009 | CCD | R | LL | D | NE, EN | |
Leposoma baturitensis* Rodrigues & Borges, 1997 | B, CIA, DSS, PB | WD | F | LL | D | NE, EN |
Leposoma scincoides Spix, 1825 | CCD | R | LL | D | LC, LC | |
Micrablepharus maximiliani (Reinhardt & Luetken, 1862) | all ecoregions | WD | O | LL | D | LC, LC |
Nothobachia ablephara* Rodrigues, 1984 | CIA, DSF, DSM | WD | O | P | D/N | LC, LC |
Placosoma limaverdorum* Borges-Nojosa, Caramaschi & Rodrigues, 2016 | B | R | F | LL | D | NE, NE |
Procellosaurinus erythrocercus* Rodrigues, 1991 | CIA, DSF, DSM, SFG | WD | O | P | D | LC, LC |
Procellosaurinus tetradactylus* Rodrigues, 1991 | DSF | R | O | P | D | NE, EN |
Psilops mucugensis* Rodrigues, Recoder, Teixeira Jr., Roscito, Guerrero, Nunes, Freitas, Fernandes, Bocchiglieri, Dal Vechio, Leite, Nogueira, Damasceno, Pellegrino, Argôlo & Amaro, 2017 | CCD | R | O | P | D | NE, NE |
Psilops paeminosus* (Rodrigues, 1991) | CCD, DSF, DSM, RC, SFG | WD | O | P | D | VU, NT |
Scriptosaura catimbau* Rodrigues & Santos, 2008 | RC | R | O | P | D | LC, LC |
Stenolepis ridleyi Boulenger, 1887 | B, CIA, DSS, PB, RC | WD | F | LL | D | LC, LC |
Vanzosaura multiscutata* (Amaral, 1933) | all ecoregions | WD | O | LLP | D | LC, LC |
Hoplocercidae | ||||||
Hoplocercus spinosus Fitzinger, 1843 | DSF, SFG | R | O | AT | D/N | NE, LC |
Iguanidae | ||||||
Iguana iguana (Linnaeus, 1758) | all ecoregions | WD | O, F | TB | D | LC, LC |
Leiosauridae | ||||||
Enyalius bibronii Boulenger, 1885 | B, CCD, CIA, DSM, DSS, PB, RC, SFG | WD | O, F | G | D | LC, LC |
Enyalius bilineatus (Duméril & Bibron, 1837) | DSM | R | F | G | D | LC, LC |
Enyalius catenatus (Wied, 1821) | CCD, DSM, PB | WD | F | G | D | LC, LC |
Enyalius erythroceneus* Rodrigues, Freitas, Silva & Bertolotto, 2006 | CCD | R | G | D | NE, CR | |
Enyalius pictus (Schinz, 1822) | DSM, SFG | R | F | G | D | LC, LC |
Phyllodactylidae | ||||||
Gymnodactylus geckoides Spix, 1825 | all ecoregions | WD | O, F | G | N/C | LC, LC |
Gymnodactylus vanzolinii* Cassimiro & Rodrigues, 2009 | CCD | R | O | G | N | NE, DD |
Phyllopezus diamantino* Dubeux, Gonçalves, Palmeira, Nunes, Cassimiro, Gamble, Werneck, Rodrigues & Mott, 2022 | CCD | R | S/TB | N | NE, NE | |
Phyllopezus periosus* Rodrigues, 1986 | CIA, DSM, DSS, PB, RC | WD | O | S | N | LC, LC |
Phyllopezus pollicaris (Spix, 1825) | all ecoregions | WD | O, F | G/A | N | LC, LC |
Phyllopezus selmae* Dubeux, Gonçalves, Palmeira, Nunes, Cassimiro, Gamble, Werneck, Rodrigues & Mott, 2022 | DSM, PB | R | S/TB | N | NE, NE | |
Polychrotidae | ||||||
Polychrus acutirostris Spix, 1825 | B, CCD, CIA, DSM, DSS, PB, RC, SFG | WD | O | TB | D | LC, LC |
Polychrus marmoratus (Linnaeus, 1758) | B, CIA, DSS, PB | WD | F | TB | D | LC, LC |
Mabuyidae | ||||||
Aspronema aff. dorsivittatum | CCD | R | O | ER | D | LC, LC |
Brasiliscincus heathi (Schmidt & Inger, 1951) | all ecoregions | WD | O | WD | D | LC, LC |
Copeoglossum arajara* (Rebouças-Spieker, 1981) | CIA, DSS, SFG | WD | O | OD | D | LC, LC |
Copeoglossum nigropunctatum (Spix, 1825) | B, CCD, CIA, DSS, PB, RC, SFG | WD | F | FC | D | LC, LC |
Notomabuya frenata (Cope, 1862) | CIA, SFG | WD | O, F | LL/P/TB | D | LC, LC |
Psychosaura agmosticha (Rodrigues, 2000) | DSM, DSS, PB, RC | WD | F | R | D | LC, LC |
Psychosaura macrorhyncha (Hoge, 1947) | CCD, DSM, DSS, PB, RC | WD | F | R | D | LC, LC |
Sphaerodactylidae | ||||||
Coleodactylus meridionalis (Boulenger, 1888) | all ecoregions | WD | F | R | D | LC, LC |
Gonatodes humeralis (Guichenot, 1855) | DSS | R | F | G | D | LC, LC |
Teiidae | ||||||
Ameiva ameiva (Linnaeus, 1758) | all ecoregions | WD | O | G | D | LC, LC |
Ameivula confusioniba* (Arias, Carvalho, Rodrigues & Zaher, 2011) | SFG | R | O | G | D | LC, LC |
Ameivula nigrigula* (Arias, Carvalho, Rodrigues & Zaher, 2011) | CCD, DSM, RC, SFG | WD | F | G | D | NE, DD |
Ameivula ocellifera (Spix, 1825) | all ecoregions | WD | O | G | D | LC, LC |
Ameivula pyrrhogularis (Silva & Avila-Pires, 2013) | CIA, DSM, DSS, SFG | WD | O | G | D | LC, LC |
Glaucomastix cyanura* (Arias, Carvalho, Rodrigues & Zaher, 2011) | CCD | R | O | G | D | NE, DD |
Glaucomastix venetacauda* (Arias, Carvalho, Rodrigues & Zaher, 2011) | CIA, SFG | R | O | G | D | LC, LC |
Kentropyx calcarata Spix, 1825 | B, CIA, DSM, DSS, PB | WD | F | G | D | LC, LC |
Salvator merianae Duméril & Bibron, 1839 | B, CCD, CIA, DSM, DSS, PB, RC, SFG | WD | O | G | D | LC, LC |
Tupinambis teguixin (Linnaeus, 1758) | DSM, DSS | WD | O, F | G | D | LC, LC |
Tropiduridae | ||||||
Eurolophosaurus amathites* (Rodrigues, 1984) | DSM, DSF | R | O | P | D | DD, EN |
Eurolophosaurus divaricatus* (Rodrigues, 1986) | DSF | R | O | P | D | LC, LC |
Eurolophosaurus aff. divaricatus* | DSF | R | O | P | D | NE, NE |
Eurolophosaurus sp.* | CCD, DSM | R | O | P | D | NE, NE |
Stenocercus squarrosus Nogueira & Rodrigues, 2006 | CIA, SFG | R | O | P | D | LC, LC |
Strobilurus torquatus Wiegmann, 1834 | B, CIA, DSM, DSS, PB | WD | F | TB | D | LC, LC |
Tropidurus cocorobensis* Rodrigues, 1987 | CCD, DSM, DSF, RC | WD | O | P | D | LC, LC |
Tropidurus erythrocephalus* Rodrigues, 1987 | CCD, DSM, DSS | R | O | S | D | NT, VU |
Tropidurus etheridgei Cei, 1982 | DSM, SFG | WD | O | S | D | LC, LC |
Tropidurus helenae* (Manzani & Abe, 1990) | CIA, DSM, SFG | R | O | S | D | LC, LC |
Tropidurus hispidus (Spix, 1825) | all ecoregions | WD | O | G | D | LC, LC |
Tropidurus jaguaribanus* Passos, Lima & Borges-Nojosa, 2011 | CIA, DSM, DSS | R | O | S | D | NE, NT |
Tropidurus montanus Rodrigues, 1987 | DSM, SFG | WD | O | G | D | LC, LC |
Tropidurus mucujensis* Rodrigues, 1987 | CCD, DSM | R | S | D | NE DD | |
Tropidurus oreadicus Rodrigues, 1987 | CCD, CIA, DSM, DSS, SFG | WD | O | A/S | D | LC, LC |
Tropidurus pinima* (Rodrigues, 1984) | DSM, DSF | WD | O | S | D | LC, LC |
Tropidurus psammonastes* Rodrigues, Kasahara & Yonenaga-Yasuda, 1988 | DSF, SFG | R | O | P | D | DD, EN |
Tropidurus semitaeniatus* (Spix, 1825) | all ecoregions | WD | O | S | D | LC, LC |
Tropidurus sertanejo* Carvalho, Sena, Peloso, Machado, Montesinos, Silva, Campbell & Rodrigues, 2016 | DSM, SFG | R | O | G | D | NE, NE |
Forty-one species (44%) of lizards show restricted distribution (EOO < 20,000 km2), and 52 species (56%) present wide distributions (EOO < 21,000 km2). Twelve species (Ameiva ameiva, Ameivula ocellifera, Brasiliscincus heathi, Coleodactylus meridionalis, Gymnodactylus geckoides, Hemidactylus mabouia, Iguana iguana, Micrablepharus maximiliani, Phyllopezus pollicaris, Tropidurus hispidus, T. semitaeniatus and Vanzosaura multiscutata) occur throughout the whole Caatinga area (see Appendix S3 and S4).
We recorded lizards in 373 municipalities (Fig.
The Caatinga ecoregions had between 25 and 59 lizard species (Appendix S6). The richest ecoregion was the Depressão Sertaneja Meridional (59 species, 62.3% of the total), followed by the Complexo Ibiapaba-Araripe, and São Francisco/Gurguéia (both with 45 species, 48.4%), Complexo da Chapada Diamantina, and Depressão Sertaneja Setentrional (both with 41 species, 44.1%), Planalto da Borborema (36 species, 38.7%), Dunas do São Francisco (31 species, 33.3%), Raso da Catarina (29 species, 31.2%), and Brejos (25 species, 26.9%). The most species-rich state was Bahia (74 species, 79.6%), followed by Ceará (45 species, 48.4%), Pernambuco (43 species, 46.2%), Piauí (41 species, 44.1%), Paraíba (32 species, 34.4%), Alagoas (30 species, 32.3%), Rio Grande do Norte (27 species, 29%), Sergipe (25 species, 26.9%), and Minas Gerais (18 species, 19.4%) (Appendix S7).
The Caatinga ecoregions also exhibited a high number of endemic species, ranging from five to 26 lizard species (Appendix S6). The most endemism-rich ecoregion was the Depressão Sertaneja Meridional (26 species, 53.1%), followed by the Complexo da Chapada Diamantina, Dunas do São Francisco, and São Francisco/Gurguéia (all with 17 species each, 34.7%), Complexo Ibiapaba-Araripe (14 species, 28.6%), Depressão Sertaneja Setentrional (10 species, 20.4%), Raso da Catarina (nine species, 18.4%), Planalto da Borborema (eight species, 16.3%), and Brejos (five species, 10.2%). The number of endemic species per state was higher in Bahia (37 species, 75.5%), followed by Piauí (16 species, 32.7%), Pernambuco (13 species, 26.5%), Ceará (12 species, 24.5%), Alagoas (eight species, 16.3%), Paraíba and Sergipe (all with seven species each, 14.3%), Rio Grande do Norte (six species, 12.2%), and Minas Gerais (four species, 8.2%) (Appendix S7).
Still regarding the degree of endemism of lizards in the Caatinga, the “Dunas do São Francisco” are noteworthy for their high rate of endemism, with 17 endemic species (54.8% of the total number of lizards in the ecoregion). However, other ecoregions also have a high rate of endemics, such as the Depressão Sertaneja Meridional (44%), Complexo da Chapada Diamantina (41.5%), and São Francisco/Gurguéia (37.8%). All ecoregions had an endemism rate greater than or equal to 20%. The state of Bahia exhibits the highest high rate of endemism (50% of the total number of lizards in the ecoregion). Despite the low sampling and lower species richness, states with territory largely located within the Caatinga are also remarkable for presenting a considerable endemism level, such as states of Piauí (39%), Pernambuco (30.2%), and Sergipe (28%).
We obtained lizard occurrence data for only 47% (521,183 km2) of the Caatinga area (Fig.
Barra do Tapirapés, state of Mato Grosso, Brazil.
In the Caatinga it is registered in the states of Ceará and Piauí. It shows restricted distribution in the Caatinga and occurs along two ecoregions (Table
Semiarboreal and diurnal. Found in seasonally dry forests and gallery forests and adjacent habitats, where it is mainly found in leaf litter and tree trunks (
Lizards recorded in the Caatinga region. 3.1 Norops brasiliensis; 3.2 Norops fuscoauratus; 3.3 Diploglossus lessonae; 3.4 Ophiodes striatus; 3.5 Hemidactylus agrius; 3.6 Hemidactylus brasilianus; 3.7 Hemidactylus mabouia; and 3.8 Lygodactylus klugei. Photograph credits: Mauro Teixeira (3.1), Marco A. Freitas (3.2), Daniel Mesquita (3.5, 3.7), Adrian Garda (3.3, 3.4, 3.6, 3.8)
Rio Mamoré, between Loreto and the confluence of Rio Sara, Moxos province, Bolivia.
In the Caatinga it is registered in the states of Bahia, Ceará and Pernambuco. It is widespread in the Caatinga and occurs along five ecoregions (Table
Arboreal and diurnal (
Brazil.
In the Caatinga it is registered in the states of Alagoas, Bahia, Ceará, Paraíba, Pernambuco, Rio Grande do Norte, and Sergipe. It is widespread in the Caatinga and occurs along seven ecoregions (Table
Semifossorial and diurnal
state of Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.
In the Caatinga it is registered in the states of Bahia, Ceará, and Minas Gerais. It is widespread in the Caatinga and occurs along three ecoregions (Table
Fossorial and diurnal (
In the Caatinga it is registered in the states of Bahia, Ceará, and Pernambuco. It is widespread in the Caatinga and occurs along three ecoregions (Table
Fossorial and diurnal (
Valença, state of Piauí, Brazil.
Caatinga endemic species. It is registered in the states of Bahia, Ceará, Paraíba, Pernambuco, Piauí, and Rio Grande do Norte. It is widespread in the Caatinga and occurs along four ecoregions (Table
Terrestrial and nocturnal
Rio Pandeiros, state of Minas Gerais, Brazil.
In the Caatinga it is registered in the states of Alagoas, Bahia, Ceará, Paraíba, Pernambuco, Piauí, Rio Grande do Norte, and Sergipe. It is widespread in the Caatinga and occurs along eight ecoregions (Table
Terrestrial and nocturnal/crepuscular
Antilles, restricted to St. Vincent Island, Lesser Antilles, by Stejneger (1904).
In the Caatinga it is recorded in the states of Alagoas, Bahia, Ceará, Minas Gerais, Paraíba, Pernambuco, Piauí, Rio Grande do Norte, and Sergipe. It is widespread in the Caatinga and occurs along all ecoregions (Table
In South America, H. mabouia is considered an invasive species that was originally introduced either carried by ships used to transport slaves in the 19th century (
Carnaubeira, state of Pernambuco, Brazil.
In the Caatinga it is registered in the states of Alagoas, Bahia, Ceará, Paraíba, Pernambuco, Piauí, Rio Grande do Norte, and Sergipe. It is widespread in the Caatinga and occurs along eight ecoregions (Table
Arboreal and diurnal
Caatinga endemic species. It is recorded only in the state of Bahia. It shows restricted distribution in the Caatinga and occurs along one ecoregion (Table
Arboreal and diurnal
Caatinga endemic species. It is recorded only in the state of Bahia. It shows restricted distribution in the Caatinga and occurs along one ecoregion (Table
Arboreal and diurnal
Villa Nova, municipality of Senhor do Bonfim, state of Bahia, Brazil.
Caatinga endemic species. It is registered in the states of Alagoas, Bahia, Ceará, Minas Gerais, Paraíba, Pernambuco, Piauí, Rio Grande do Norte, and Sergipe. It is widespread in the Caatinga and occur along six ecoregions (Table
Lizards recorded in the Caatinga region. 4.1 Acratosaura mentalis; 4.2 Acratosaura spinosa; 4.3 Anotosaura collaris; 4.4 Anotosaura vanzolinia; 4.5 Calyptommatus confusionibus; 4.6 Calyptommatus frontalis; 4.7 Calyptommatus leiolepis; and 4.8 Calyptommatus nicterus. Photograph credits: Marco A. Freitas (4.2, 4.7, 4.8), Miguel T. Rodrigues (4.6), Mauro Teixeira (4.3), Adrian Garda (4.1, 4.4, 4.5).
Fossorial and diurnal (
Caraíbas Farm, municipality of Mucugê, Serra do Sincorá, Serra do Espinhaço, state of Bahia, Brazil.
Caatinga endemic species. It is recorded only in the state of Bahia. It shows restricted distribution in the Caatinga and occurs along one ecoregion (Table
Fossorial and diurnal (
Villa Nova, municipality of Senhor do Bonfim, state of Bahia, Brazil.
Caatinga endemic species. It is recorded only in the state of Bahia. It shows restricted distribution in the Caatinga and occurs along one ecoregion (Table
Fossorial or semifossorial and diurnal (
Agrestina, state of Pernambuco, Brazil.
Caatinga endemic species. It is registered in the states of Alagoas, Bahia, Ceará, Paraíba, Pernambuco, Piauí, and Rio Grande do Norte. It is widespread in the Caatinga and occurs along four ecoregions (Table
Fossorial and diurnal. It occurs in different habitats, with prevalence in microhabitats with leaf litter and earthy soil near rocky outcrops (
Toca da Cabocla, Serra Grande, Parque Nacional da Serra das Confusões, state of Piauí, Brazil.
Caatinga endemic species. It is recorded only in the state of Piauí. It shows restricted distribution in the Caatinga and occurs along two ecoregions (Table
Fossorial and nocturnal (
Lameirão, Buritirama, state of Bahia, Brazil.
Caatinga endemic species. It is recorded only in the state of Bahia. It shows restricted distribution in the Caatinga and occurs along one ecoregion (Table
Fossorial and nocturnal (
Ibiraba, state of Bahia, Brazil
Caatinga endemic species. It is recorded only in the states of Bahia and Pernambuco. It shows restricted distribution in the Caatinga and occurs along two ecoregions (Table
Fossorial and nocturnal (
Capim Verde, state of Bahia, Brazil.
Caatinga endemic species. It is recorded only in of Bahia. It shows restricted distribution in the Caatinga and occurs along three ecoregions (Table
Fossorial and nocturnal (
Lizards recorded in the Caatinga region. 5.1 Calyptommatus sinebrachiatus; 5.2 Cercosaura olivacea; 5.3 Colobosaura modesta; 5.4 Colobosauroides carvalhoi; 5.5 Colobosauroides cearensis; 5.6 Dryadosaura nordestina; 5.7 Heterodactylus septentrionalis and 5.8 Leposoma baturitensis. Photograph credits: Ricardo Marques (5.1), Mauro Teixeira (5.4), Daniel Mesquita (5.3), Kássio Araújo (5.5), Marco A. Freitas (5.7), Adrian Garda (5.2, 5.6).
Santo Inácio, state of Bahia, Brazil.
Caatinga endemic species. It is registered in the states of Bahia and Piauí. It shows restricted distribution in the Caatinga and occurs along two ecoregions (Table
Fossorial and nocturnal (
Caatinga endemic lineage. It is recorded only in the state of Bahia. It shows restricted distribution in the Caatinga and occurs along one ecoregion (Table
Fossorial and nocturnal (
Caatinga endemic lineage. It is recorded only in the state of Bahia. It shows restricted distribution in the Caatinga and occurs along one ecoregion (Table
Fossorial and nocturnal (
Calyptommatus sp. 2 “Barra” were retrieved nested within C. leiolepis with strong support for the external node, but with weak support for internal relationships among clades. Both have a narrow parapatric distribution on the Xique-Xique dune field (
Diet based mainly on arthropods, no information about the preferred items on the diet of this species is known. Oviparous, no detailed data is known about the number of eggs laid by the species, but it could be similar to other Calyptommatus species (
State of Pernambuco, Brazil.
In the Caatinga it is registered in the states of Alagoas, Bahia, Ceará, Paraíba, and Rio Grande do Norte. It is widespread in the Caatinga and occurs along seven ecoregions (Table
Fossorial and both diurnal and nocturnal (DOM pers. obs.). It is found in enclaves of open areas and in the brejos nordestinos (
Morro da Garça, municipality of Curvelo, state of Minas Gerais, Brazil.
In the Caatinga it is registered in the states of Bahia, Ceará and Piauí. It is widespread in the Caatinga and occurs along four ecoregions (Table
Fossorial and diurnal (
Barreiras, state of Bahia, Brazil.
Caatinga endemic species. It is registered in the states of Bahia, Ceará and Piauí. It is widespread in the Caatinga and occurs along three ecoregions (Table
Fossorial and diurnal (
Sítio Lorena, municipality of Mulungu, Serra de Baturité, state of Ceará, Brazil.
Caatinga endemic species. It is registered in the states of Ceará, Paraíba, and Piauí. It is widespread in the Caatinga and occurs along three ecoregions (Table
Fossorial and diurnal. In habits shaded microhabitats in the Caatinga and prefers microenvironments with leaf litter and minimal direct exposure to sunlight (
João Pessoa, state of Paraíba, Brazil.
In the Caatinga it is registered in the states of Bahia, Paraíba, Pernambuco, and Rio Grande do Norte. It is widespread in the Caatinga and occurs along three ecoregions (Table
Fossorial and diurnal (
Fazenda Caraíbas, municipality of Mucugê, Serra do Espinhaço, state of Bahia, Brazil.
Caatinga endemic species. It is recorded only in the state of Bahia. It shows restricted distribution in the Caatinga and occurs along one ecoregion (Table
Fossorial and diurnal (
Sítio Barbosa, municipality of Pacoti, Serra de Baturité, state of Ceará, Brazil.
Caatinga endemic species. It is registered in the states of Alagoas and Ceará. It is widespread in the Caatinga and occurs along four ecoregions (Table
Fossorial and diurnal (
Banks of Rio Amazon, Brazil.
In the Caatinga it is recorded only in the state of Bahia. It shows restricted distribution in the Caatinga and occurs along one ecoregion (Table
Fossorial and diurnal (
Municipality of Maruim, state of Sergipe, Brazil.
In the Caatinga it is registered in the states of Alagoas, Bahia, Ceará, Paraíba, Pernambuco, Piauí, Rio Grande do Norte, and Sergipe. It is widespread in the Caatinga and occurs along all ecoregions (Table
Lizards recorded in the Caatinga region. 6.1 Micrablepharus maximiliani; 6.2 Nothobachia ablephara; 6.3 Procellosaurinus erythrocercus; 6.4 Procellosaurinus tetradactylus; 6.5 Psilops mucugensis; 6.6 Psilops paeminosus; 6.7 Scriptosaura catimbau, and 6.8 Stenolepis ridleyi. Photograph credits: Mauro Teixeira (6.2, 6.4, 6.6), Marco A. Freitas (6.8), Adrian Garda (6.1, 6.3, 6.5, 6.7).
Terrestrial and diurnal (
São Raimundo Nonato, state of Piauí, Brazil (corrected to Sal, state of Piauí, Brazil, 09°11 'S, 42°03'W).
Caatinga endemic species. It is recorded in the states of Bahia, Pernambuco and Piauí. It is widespread in the Caatinga and occurs along three ecoregions (Table
Fossorial and both diurnal and nocturnal (
Olho d’Água dos Tangarás farm, Maciço de Baturité, municipality of Pacoti, state of Ceará, Brazil.
Caatinga endemic species. It is recorded only in the state of Ceará. It shows restricted distribution in the Caatinga and occurs along one ecoregion (Table
Fossorial and diurnal (
Ibiraba, state of Bahia, Brazil.
Caatinga endemic species. It is registered in the states of Bahia, Pernambuco, and Piauí. It is widespread in the Caatinga and occurs along four ecoregions (Table
Fossorial and diurnal (
Alagoado, state of Bahia, Brazil.
Caatinga endemic species. It is recorded only in the state of Bahia. It shows restricted distribution in the Caatinga and occurs along one ecoregion (Table
Fossorial and diurnal (
Três Irmãos Farm, municipality of Mucugê, Serra do Espinhaço (Diamantina Plateau), state of Bahia, Brazil.
Caatinga endemic species. It is recorded only in the state of Bahia. It shows restricted distribution in the Caatinga and occurs along one ecoregion (Table
Fossorial and diurnal (
Santo Inácio, state of Bahia, Brazil.
Caatinga endemic species. It is registered in the states of Bahia, Minas Gerais, and Sergipe. It is widespread in the Caatinga and occurs along five ecoregions (Table
Fossorial and diurnal (
Porto Seguro Farm, municipality of Buíque, Parque Nacional do Catimbau, state of Pernambuco, Brazil.
Caatinga endemic species. It is recorded only in the state of Pernambuco. It shows restricted distribution in the Caatinga and occurs along one ecoregion (Table
Fossorial and diurnal (
Igarassu forest (also referred to as Iguarassu), state of Pernambuco, Brazil.
In the Caatinga it is registered in the states of Ceará, Paraíba, and Pernambuco. It is widespread in the Caatinga and occurs along five ecoregions (Table
Fossorial and diurnal. It occurs in isolated forest remnants in the semi-arid Northeast, associated with high-altitude marshes and mountainous areas (
Senhor do Bonfim, state of Bahia, Brazil.
Caatinga endemic species. It is registered in the states of Alagoas, Bahia, Ceará, Minas Gerais, Paraíba, Pernambuco, Piauí, Rio Grande do Norte, and Sergipe. It is widespread in the Caatinga and occurs along all ecoregions (Table
Lizards recorded in the Caatinga region. 7.1 Vanzosaura multiscutata; 7.2 Hoplocercus spinosus; 7.3 Iguana iguana; 7.4 Enyalius bibronii; 7.5 Enyalius catenatus; 7.6 Enyalius erythroceneus; 7.7 Enyalius pictus, and 7.8 Gymnodactylus geckoides. Photograph credits: Daniel Mesquita (7.3, 7.8), Marco A. Freitas (7.5, 7.6, 7.7), Adrian Garda (7.1, 7.2, 7.4).
Fossorial and diurnal
America and Brazil.
In the Caatinga it is registered in the states of Bahia and Piauí. It shows restricted distribution in the Caatinga and occurs along two ecoregions (Table
Terrestrial and both diurnal and nocturnal (
“Indiis”, restricted by
In the Caatinga it is registered in the states of Alagoas, Bahia, Ceará, Minas Gerais, Paraíba, Pernambuco, Piauí, Rio Grande do Norte, and Sergipe. It is widespread in the Caatinga and occurs along all ecoregions (Table
Arboreal and diurnal
State of Bahia, Brazil.
In the Caatinga it is registered in the states of Alagoas, Bahia, Ceará, Minas Gerais, Paraíba, Pernambuco, Piauí, and Rio Grande do Norte. It is widespread in the Caatinga and occurs along eight ecoregions (Table
Semiarboreal and diurnal (
‘‘Brésil’’ [= Brazil].
In the Caatinga it is recorded only in the state of Bahia. It shows restricted distribution in the Caatinga and occurs along one ecoregion (Table
Semiarboreal and diurnal (
Cabeça do Boi, Bahia, Brazil (fide Etheridge 1968) [= Jequié, Bahia]; “sertao (= interior) of Bahia” (fide
In the Caatinga it is registered in the states of Alagoas, Bahia and Pernambuco. It is widespread in the Caatinga and occurs along three ecoregions (Table
Semiarboreal and diurnal (
Fazenda Caraíbas, municipality of Mucugê, Serra do Espinhaço (Chapada Diamantina), state of Bahia, Brazil.
Caatinga endemic species. It is recorded only in the state of Bahia. It shows restricted distribution in the Caatinga and occurs along one ecoregion (Table
Lizards recorded in the Caatinga region. 8.1 Gymnodactylus vanzolinii; 8.2 Phyllopezus diamantino; 8.3 Phyllopezus periosus; 8.4 Phyllopezus pollicaris; 8.5 Phyllopezus selmae, 8.6 Polychrus acutirostris; 8.7 Polychrus marmoratus, and 8.8 Brasiliscincus heathi. Photograph credits: Mauro Teixeira (8.1), José Cassimiro (8.2), Fagner Delfim (8.3), Daniel Mesquita (8.7), Marcos Dubeux (8.5), Adrian Garda (8.4, 8.6, 8.8).
Semiarboreal and diurnal (
Mucuri and Lago d’Arara, state of Bahia, Brazil.
It is recorded only in the states of Bahia and Minas Gerais. It shows restricted distribution in the Caatinga and occurs along two ecoregions (Table
Semiarboreal and diurnal (
State of Bahia, Brasil.
In the Caatinga it is registered in the states of Alagoas, Bahia, Ceará, Paraíba, Pernambuco, Piauí, Rio Grande do Norte, and Sergipe. It is widespread in the Caatinga and occurs along all ecoregions (Table
Terrestrial and crespuscular/nocturnal (Vanzolini et al. 1981;
Municipality of Mucugê, Serra do Sincorá, Chapada Diamantina, state of Bahia, Brazil.
Caatinga endemic species. It is recorded only in the state of Bahia. It shows restricted distribution in the Caatinga and occurs along one ecoregion (Table
Terrestrial and nocturnal (
Municipality of Mucugê, Serra do Sincorá, Chapada Diamantina, state of Bahia, Brazil.
Caatinga endemic species. It is recorded only in the state of Bahia. It shows restricted distribution in the Caatinga and occurs along one ecoregion (Table
Terrestrial and nocturnal. The species is known only from the mountains of Serra do Sincorá, occurring in areas of campos rupestres vegetation. Observed specimens on rocky outcrops and in tree and shrub trunks (
Bravo Farm, municipality of Cabaceiras, state of Paraíba, Brazil.
Caatinga endemic species. It is registered in the states of Alagoas, Ceará, Paraíba, Pernambuco, Rio Grande do Norte, and Sergipe. It is widespread in the Caatinga and occurs along five ecoregions (Table
Saxicolous and nocturnal. It has ambush foraging habits, associated with rock formations, with emphasis on the use of cracks in rocks and bare rock (
Sylvis interioris Bahiae campestribus, according
In the Caatinga it is registered in the states of Alagoas, Bahia, Ceará, Minas Gerais, Paraíba, Pernambuco, Piauí, Rio Grande do Norte, and Sergipe. It is widespread in the Caatinga and occurs along all ecoregions (Table
Semiarboreal and nocturnal. It is found both in open formations and in forested areas along the Caatinga
Municipality of Boca da Mata, Cariri da Prensa Farm, state of Alagoas, Brazil.
Caatinga endemic species. It is recorded only in the state of Alagoas. It shows restricted distribution in the Caatinga and occurs along two ecoregions (Table
Terrestrial and nocturnal. The species is found in rocky outcrops and trees. Were mainly observed active in the early evening when foraging in forested sites near rivers with rocky bed (
State of Bahia, Brazil.
In the Caatinga it is registered in the states of Alagoas, Bahia, Ceará, Minas Gerais, Paraíba, Pernambuco, Piauí, Rio Grande do Norte, and Sergipe. It is widespread in the Caatinga and occurs along eight ecoregions (Table
Arboreal and diurnal
“Hispania”, restricted by
In the Caatinga it is registered in the states of Ceará, Paraíba, Pernambuco, and Rio Grande do Norte. It is widespread in the Caatinga and occurs along four ecoregions (Table
Arboreal and diurnal. Occurring in the caatinga associated with tropical forests relics (
Paraguay.
In the Caatinga it is recorded only in the state of Bahia. It shows restricted distribution in the Caatinga and occurs along one ecoregion (Table
Terrestrial and diurnal (
Fortaleza, state of Ceará, Brazil.
In the Caatinga it is registered in the states of Alagoas, Bahia, Ceará, Paraíba, Pernambuco, Piauí, Rio Grande do Norte, and Sergipe. It is widespread in the Caatinga and occurs along all ecoregions (Table
Terrestrial and diurnal
Arajara, state of Ceará, Brazil.
Caatinga endemic species. It is registered in the states of Ceará, Pernambuco, and Piauí. It is widespread in the Caatinga and occurs along three ecoregions (Table
Lizards recorded in the Caatinga region. 9.1 Copeoglossum arajara; 9.2 Copeoglossum nigropunctatum; 9.3 Notomabuya frenata; 9.4 Psychosaura agmosticha; 9.5 Psychosaura macrorhyncha; 9.6 Coleodactylus meridionalis; 9.7 Gonatodes humeralis, and 9.8 Ameiva ameiva. Photograph credits: Samuel Ribeiro (9.1), Daniel Mesquita (9.4, 9.7), Fagner Delfim (9.3), Adrian Garda (9.2, 9.5, 9.6, 9.8).
Terrestrial and diurnal. It is recorded in a narrow transitional area, on the edges of the forest and open areas, in different mesic environments (
Ecgá, Brazil.
In the Caatinga it is registered in the states of Alagoas, Bahia, Ceará, Paraíba, Pernambuco and Piauí. It is widespread in the Caatinga and occurs along seven ecoregions (Table
Terrestrial and diurnal. Lives in leaf litter and tree trunks in open areas and forest (
Río Paraguay valley, Paraguay.
In the Caatinga it is registered in the states of Ceará, Minas Gerais, and Piauí. It is widespread in the Caatinga and occurs along two ecoregions (Table
Terrestrial and diurnal. It is reported to occur in open environments, on rocks and forest edges, and in some urban areas (
Xingó, state of Alagoas, Brazil.
In the Caatinga it is registered in the states of Alagoas, Ceará, Paraíba, Pernambuco, Rio Grande do Norte, and Sergipe. It is widespread in the Caatinga and occurs along four ecoregions (Table
Terrestrial and diurnal. It is found in Caatinga areas where there is predominance of bromeliads (
Ilha da Queimada Grande, Brazil.
In the Caatinga it is registered in the states of Alagoas, Bahia, Paraíba, Pernambuco, Rio Grande do Norte, and Sergipe. It is widespread in the Caatinga and occurs along five ecoregions (Table
Terrestrial and diurnal. They in a great variety of habitats, including open and forested areas inside Caatinga; under litter, rocks, shrubs and are generally associated with bromeliads (
Igarassu, state of Pernambuco, Brazil.
In the Caatinga it is registered in the states of Alagoas, Bahia, Ceará, Paraíba, Pernambuco, Piauí, Rio Grande do Norte, and Sergipe. It is widespread in the Caatinga and occurs along all ecoregions (Table
Terrestrial and diurnal. It is found in leaf litter of the arboreal Caatinga, with moist soil (
Rio Ucayali, Mission de Sarayacu, Peru.
In the Caatinga it is recorded only in the state of Ceará. It shows restricted distribution in the Caatinga and occurs along one ecoregion (Table
Semiarboreal and diurnal (
America, restricted by
In the Caatinga it is registered in the states of Alagoas, Bahia, Ceará, Minas Gerais, Paraíba, Pernambuco, Piauí, Rio Grande do Norte, and Sergipe. It is widespread in the Caatinga and occurs along all ecoregions (Table
Terrestrial and diurnal
Toca da Cabocla, municipality of Caracol, Parque Nacional da Serra das Confusões , state of Piauí, Brazil.
Caatinga endemic species. It is recorded only in the state of Piauí. It shows restricted distribution in the Caatinga and occurs along one ecoregion (Table
Lizards recorded in the Caatinga region. 10.1 Ameivula confusioniba; 10.2 Ameivula nigrigula; 10.3 Ameivula ocellifera; 10.4 Ameivula pyrrhogularis; 10.5 Glaucomastix cyanura; 10.6 Glaucomastix venetacauda; 10.7 Kentropyx calcarata, and 10.8 Salvator merianae. Photograph credits: Adrian Garda (10.1, 10.3, 10.6, 10.7), Daniel Mesquita (10.2), Davi Pantoja (10.4), Ricardo Marques (10.5), Fagner Delfim (10.8).
Terrestrial and diurnal. It is seen foraging among tufts of Caatinga on white sand soils. Eventually found crossing rocky areas (
Santo Inácio, state of Bahia, Brazil.
Caatinga endemic species. It is registered in the states of Bahia, Minas Gerais, and Sergipe. It is widespread in the Caatinga and occurs along four ecoregions (Table
Terrestrial and diurnal (
State of Bahia, Brazil.
In the Caatinga it is registered in the states of Alagoas, Bahia, Ceará, Minas Gerais, Paraíba, Pernambuco, Piauí, Rio Grande do Norte, and Sergipe. It is widespread in the Caatinga and occurs along all ecoregions (Table
Terrestrial and diurnal
Fazenda Bonito, municipality of Castelo do Piauí, state of Piauí, Brazil.
In the Caatinga it is registered in the states of Bahia, Ceará, Pernambuco, and Piauí. It is widespread in the Caatinga and with annual mean temperature 20 to 28°C along four ecoregions (Table
Terrestrial and diurnal. It can be found in a variety of habitats like pasture even in rocky areas, open cerrado, in sandy or rocky soils, around boulders, on forest edges, being also common around human habitation (
Morro do Chapéu, state of Bahia, Brazil.
Caatinga endemic species. It is recorded only in the state of Bahia. It shows restricted distribution in the Caatinga and with annual mean temperature 20 to 28°C along one ecoregion (Table
Terrestrial and diurnal. Occurring in campos rupestres on white sand soils, observed foraging in the leaf litter and sand near rocky outcrops (
Olho D’água da Santa, municipality of Caracol, Parque Nacional da Serra das Confusões, state of Piauí, Brazil.
Caatinga endemic species. It is recorded only in the state of Piauí. It shows restricted distribution in the Caatinga and with annual mean temperature 20 to 28°C along two ecoregions (Table
Terrestrial and diurnal. It can be found in areas with sandy soils with sandstone outcrops of the Parque Nacional Serra das Confusões. They often took refuge under rocks, fallen logs, piles of rubble or small holes in the groundalong the caatinga vegetation (
Rio Itapecuru, state of Maranhão, Brazil.
In the Caatinga it is registered in the states of Bahia, Ceará, Paraíba, Pernambuco and Piauí. It is widespread in the Caatinga and with annual mean temperature 20 to 28°C along five ecoregions (Table
Terrestrial and diurnal. It can be found in forested and open areas typical of savannas (Gallagher and Dixon 1992;
Cayenne, French Guiana; Brazil; Montevideo, Uruguay.
In the Caatinga it is registered in the states of Alagoas, Bahia, Ceará, Paraíba, Pernambuco, Piauí, Rio Grande do Norte, and Sergipe. It is widespread in the Caatinga and with annual mean temperature 20 to 28°C along eight ecoregions (Table
Terrestrial and diurnal. It is found in all kind of open vegetation landscapes inside Caatinga (
“Indiis”, restricted by Presch (1973) to Paramaribo, Suriname.
In the Caatinga it is registered in the states of Bahia, Ceará, and Piauí. It is widespread in the Caatinga and with annual mean temperature 20 to 28°C along two ecoregions (Table
Lizards recorded in the Caatinga region. 11.1 Tupinambis teguixin; 11.2 Eurolophosaurus amathites; 11.3 Eurolophosaurus divaricatus; 11.4 Stenocercus squarrosus; 11.5 Strobilurus torquatus; 11.6 Tropidurus cocorobensis; 11.7 Tropidurus erythrocephalus, and 11.8 Tropidurus etheridgei. Photograph credits: Daniel Mesquita (11.1, 11.4), Marco A. Freitas (11.2, 11.3, 11.5, 11.7, 11.8), Adrian Garda (11.6).
Terrestrial and diurnal. Occurs in sandy soil and riparian vegetation with deciduous and thorny shrubs in a semiarid climate (
Santo Inácio, state of Bahia, Brazil.
Caatinga endemic species. It is recorded only in the state of Bahia. It shows restricted distribution in the Caatinga and with annual mean temperature 20 to 28°C along two ecoregions (Table
Terrestrial and diurnal. It occurs in the sand dunes of the São Francisco River. The microhabitat used by this species is the leaf litter under shrubs and vegetation with a height of less than 2 m (
Arraial do Paulista, state of Bahia, Brazil.
Caatinga endemic species. It is recorded only in the state of Bahia. It shows restricted distribution in the Caatinga and with annual mean temperature 20 to 28°C along one ecoregion (Table
Terrestrial and diurnal. It normally occurs in open areas of sandy environments and habitats (
Caatinga endemic species. It is recorded only in the state of Bahia. It shows restricted distribution in the Caatinga and with annual mean temperature 20 to 28°C along one ecoregion (Table
Terrestrial and diurnal. According to
Caatinga endemic species. It is recorded only in the state of Bahia. It shows restricted distribution in the Caatinga and with annual mean temperature 20 to 28°C along two ecoregions (Table
Terrestrial and diurnal. It is a species of Eurolophosaurus related to Eurolophosaurus nanuzae (
Chapada dos Gerais, a sandstone plateau in Parque Nacional Serra das Confusões, state of Piauí, Brazil.
In the Caatinga it is registered in the states of Ceará and Piauí. It shows restricted distribution in the Caatinga and with annual mean temperature 20 to 28°C along two ecoregions (Table
Terrestrial and diurnal. This species is recorded in isolated elevated plateaus Ceará (Floresta Nacional do Araripe-Apodi) with adjacent in low elevation areas close to the Cerrado in the state of Piauí (
Brazil.
In the Caatinga it is registered in the states of Alagoas, Bahia, Ceará, Pernambuco, and Sergipe. It is widespread in the Caatinga and with annual mean temperature 20 to 28°C along five ecoregions (Table
Arboreal and diurnal. It is considered a forest-dwelling heliophilic lizard, in the Caatinga it is found in isolated enclaves of semi-arid tropical forest, under tree trunks at different levels of the forest (
Cocorobó, state of Bahia, Brazil.
Caatinga endemic species. It is registered in the states of Alagoas, Bahia, Pernambuco, and Sergipe. It is widespread in the Caatinga and with annual mean temperature 20 to 28°C along four ecoregions (Table
Terrestrial and diurnal. It is a psammophilic species occurring in sandy soils, with relictual distribution in semi-arid environments along the Caatinga (
Morro do Chapéu, state of Bahia, Brazil.
Caatinga endemic species. It is recorded only in the state of Bahia. It shows restricted distribution in the Caatinga and with annual mean temperature 20 to 28°C along three ecoregions (Table
Terrestrial and diurnal. It occurs in campos rupestres, with a record in Santo Inácio (
Mina Claveros, province of Cordoba, Argentina.
In the Caatinga it is registered in the states of Bahia and Minas Gerais It is widespread in the Caatinga and with annual mean temperature 20 to 28°C along along two ecoregions (Table
Terrestrial and diurnal. It occups a general dry habitat including tree trunks and sandy soils (
Toca de Cima dos Pilões, municipality of São Raimundo Nonato, state of Piauí, Brazil.
Caatinga endemic species. It is recorded only in the state of Piauí. It shows restricted distribution in the Caatinga and with annual mean temperature 20 to 28°C along three ecoregions (Table
Lizards recorded in the Caatinga region. 12.1 Tropidurus helenae; 12.2 Tropidurus hispidus; 12.3 Tropidurus jaguaribanus; 12.4 Tropidurus montanus; 12.5 Tropidurus mucujensis; 12.6 Tropidurus oreadicus; 12.7 Tropidurus pinima and 12.8 Tropidurus semitaeniatus. Photograph credits: Daniel Mesquita (12.1, 12.6, 12.8), Adrian Garda (12.2), Daniel Passos (12.3, 12.4, 12.7), Marco A. Freitas (12.5).
Terrestrial and diurnal. It is a saxicolous species specializing in rocky areas with crevices (
Bahia, restricted by
In the Caatinga it is registered in the states of Alagoas, Bahia, Ceará, Minas Gerais, Paraíba, Pernambuco, Piauí, Rio Grande do Norte, and Sergipe. It is widespread in the Caatinga and with annual mean temperature 20 to 28°C along all ecoregions (Table
Terrestrial and diurnal. It inhabits usually open-areas, and shows great spatial niche plasticity using a wide variety of substrates, being found on rocky surfaces, forest edges, trunks of trees, sandy soils, fences and walls of human constructions, among others (
São João do Jaguaribe, state of Ceará, Brazil.
Caatinga endemic species. It is recorded only in the states of Ceará and Piauí. It shows restricted distribution in the Caatinga and with annual mean temperature 20 to 28°C along three ecoregions (Table
Terrestrial and diurnal. It inhabits regions with fractured granitic rocky outcrops, surrounded by hypoxerophytic caatinga in the state of Ceará (
Serra do Cipó, state of Minas Gerais, Brazil.
In the Caatinga it is registered in the states of Bahia and Minas Gerais. It is widespread in the Caatinga and with annual mean temperature 20 to 28°C along two ecoregions (Table
Terrestrial and diurnal. Occurring in desert regions and xeric thickets, with rocky outcrops, sandy soils in grassy fields, in shrubs and walls (
Mucugê, state of Bahia, Brazil.
Caatinga endemic species. It is recorded only in the state of Bahia. It shows restricted distribution in the Caatinga and with annual mean temperature 20 to 28°C along two ecoregions (Table
Terrestrial and diurnal. It inhabits rupestrian grassland habitat above 900 meters of elevation (
Buritis, state of Minas Gerais, Brazil.
In the Caatinga it is registered in the states of Bahia, Minas Gerais, Pernambuco, and Piauí. It is widespread in the Caatinga and with annual mean temperature 20 to 28°C along five ecoregions (Table
Terrestrial and diurnal. Occurring in rocky open areas, shelters on the grounds and termite nests (
Santo Inácio, state of Bahia, Brazil.
Caatinga endemic species. It is recorded in the the states of Bahia and Pernambuco. It is widespread in the Caatinga and with annual mean temperature 20 to 28°C along two ecoregions (Table
Terrestrial and diurnal. It is a saxicolous lizard that occurs along open areas in the Caatinga (
Arraial do Paulista, municipality of Xique-Xique, state of Bahia, Brazil.
Caatinga endemic species. It is recorded only in the state of Bahia. It shows restricted distribution in the Caatinga and with annual mean temperature 20 to 28°C along two ecoregions (Table
Terrestrial and diurnal. Found mainly in dunes on the left bank of the São Francisco River, which are characterized by sparse vegetation, with a space of bare sand between the vegetation clumps (
“… in campis montosis Sincura provinciae Bahiae”.
Caatinga endemic species. It is registered in the states of Alagoas, Bahia, Ceará, Paraíba, Pernambuco, Piauí, Rio Grande do Norte, and Sergipe. It is widespread in the Caatinga and with annual mean temperature 20 to 28°C along all ecoregions (Table
Terrestrial and diurnal. It has a saxicolous habit and it is distributed in the rocky habitats in open areas of the Caatinga. Diet based mainly on arthropods, being Isoptera, Formicidae, Hemiptera, insect larvae, and plant material the most representative items
Reserva Particular do Patrimônio Natural Fazenda Pé da Serra, Serra do Arame, municipality of Ibotirama, State of Bahia, Brazil.
Caatinga endemic species. It is recorded only in the state of Bahia. It shows restricted distribution in the Caatinga and occur along two ecoregions (Table
Terrestrial and diurnal. It has being observed among rocks on sandy trails covered by dry forests and caatinga vegetation (
Map showing the geographic distribution records and extent of occurrence of the lizards in the Caatinga region: Norops brasiliensis, Norops fuscoauratus, Diploglossus lessonae, Ophiodes striatus, Ophiodes sp. 2, Hemidactylus agrius, Hemidactylus brasilianus, Hemidactylus mabouia, Lygodactylus klugei, Lygodactylus sp. 1, Lygodactylus sp. 2. Red circles represent data occurrence data produced in this study; Black circles represent data from literature. Ecorregions: 1: Brejos; 2: Complexo da Chapada Diamantina; 3: Complexo Ibiapaba – Araripe; 4: Depressão Sertaneja Meridional; 5: Depressão Sertaneja Setentrional; 6: Dunas do São Francisco; 7: Planalto da Borborema; 8: Raso Catarina and 9: São Francisco/Gurguéia.
Map showing the geographic distribution records and extent of occurrence of the lizards in the Caatinga region: Acratosaura mentalis, Acratosaura spinosa, Anotosaura collaris, Anotosaura vanzolinia, Calyptommatus confusionibus, Calyptommatus leiolepis, Calyptommatus frontalis, Calyptommatus nicterus, Calyptommatus sinebrachiatus, Calyptommatus sp. 1, Calyptommatus sp. 2, Cercosaura olivacea. Red circles represent data occurrence data produced in this study; Black circles represent data from literature. Ecorregions: 1: Brejos; 2: Complexo da Chapada Diamantina; 3: Complexo Ibiapaba – Araripe; 4: Depressão Sertaneja Meridional; 5: Depressão Sertaneja Setentrional; 6: Dunas do São Francisco; 7: Planalto da Borborema; 8: Raso Catarina and 9: São Francisco/Gurguéia.
Map showing the geographic distribution records and extent of occurrence of the lizards in the Caatinga region: Colobosaura modesta, Colobosauroides carvalhoi, Colobosauroides cearensis, Dryadosaura nordestina, Heterodactylus septentrionalis, Leposoma baturitensis, Leposoma scincoides, Micrablepharus maximiliani, Nothobachia ablephara, Placosoma limaverdorum, Procellosaurinus erythrocercus, Procellosaurinus tetradactylus. Red circles represent data occurrence data produced in this study; Black circles represent data from literature. Ecorregions: 1: Brejos; 2: Complexo da Chapada Diamantina; 3: Complexo Ibiapaba – Araripe; 4: Depressão Sertaneja Meridional; 5: Depressão Sertaneja Setentrional; 6: Dunas do São Francisco; 7: Planalto da Borborema; 8: Raso Catarina and 9: São Francisco/Gurguéia.
Map showing the geographic distribution records and extent of occurrence of the lizards in the Caatinga region: Psilops mucugensis, Psilops paeminosus, Scriptosaura catimbau, Stenolepis ridleyi, Vanzosaura multiscutata, Hoplocercus spinosus, Iguana iguana, Enyalius bibronii, Enyalius bilineatus, Enyalius catenatus, Enyalius erythroceneus, Enyalius pictus. Red circles represent data occurrence data produced in this study; Black circles represent data from literature. Ecorregions: 1: Brejos; 2: Complexo da Chapada Diamantina; 3: Complexo Ibiapaba – Araripe; 4: Depressão Sertaneja Meridional; 5: Depressão Sertaneja Setentrional; 6: Dunas do São Francisco; 7: Planalto da Borborema; 8: Raso Catarina and 9: São Francisco/Gurguéia.
Map showing the geographic distribution records and extent of occurrence of the lizards in the Caatinga region: Gymnodactylus geckoides, Gymnodactylus vanzolinii, Phyllopezus diamantino, Phyllopezus periosus, Phyllopezus pollicaris, Phyllopezus selmae, Polychrus acutirostris, Polychrus marmoratus, Aspronema aff. dorsivittatum, Brasiliscincus heathi, Copeoglossum arajara, Copeoglossum nigropunctatum. Red circles represent data occurrence data produced in this study; Black circles represent data from literature. Ecorregions: 1: Brejos; 2: Complexo da Chapada Diamantina; 3: Complexo Ibiapaba – Araripe; 4: Depressão Sertaneja Meridional; 5: Depressão Sertaneja Setentrional; 6: Dunas do São Francisco; 7: Planalto da Borborema; 8: Raso Catarina and 9: São Francisco/Gurguéia.
Map showing the geographic distribution records and extent of occurrence of the lizards in the Caatinga region: Notomabuya frenata, Psychosaura agmosticha, Psychosaura macrorhyncha, Coleodactylus meridionalis, Gonatodes humeralis, Ameiva ameiva, Ameivula confusioniba, Ameivula nigrigula, Ameivula ocellifera, Ameivula pyrrhogularis, Glaucomastix cyanura, Glaucomastix venetacauda. Red circles represent data occurrence data produced in this study; Black circles represent data from literature. Ecorregions: 1: Brejos; 2: Complexo da Chapada Diamantina; 3: Complexo Ibiapaba – Araripe; 4: Depressão Sertaneja Meridional; 5: Depressão Sertaneja Setentrional; 6: Dunas do São Francisco; 7: Planalto da Borborema; 8: Raso Catarina and 9: São Francisco/Gurguéia.
Map showing the geographic distribution records and extent of occurrence of the lizards in the Caatinga region: Kentropyx calcarata, Salvator merianae, Tupinambis teguixin, Eurolophosaurus amathites, Eurolophosaurus divaricatus, Eurolophosaurus aff. divaricatus, Eurolophosaurus sp., Stenocercus squarrosus, Strobilurus torquatus, Tropidurus cocorobensis, Tropidurus erythrocephalus, Tropidurus etheridgei. Red circles represent data occurrence data produced in this study; Black circles represent data from literature. Ecorregions: 1: Brejos; 2: Complexo da Chapada Diamantina; 3: Complexo Ibiapaba – Araripe; 4: Depressão Sertaneja Meridional; 5: Depressão Sertaneja Setentrional; 6: Dunas do São Francisco; 7: Planalto da Borborema; 8: Raso Catarina and 9: São Francisco/Gurguéia.
Map showing the geographic distribution records and extent of occurrence of the lizards in the Caatinga region: Tropidurus helenae, Tropidurus hispidus, Tropidurus jaguaribanus, Tropidurus montanus, Tropidurus mucujensis, Tropidurus oreadicus, Tropidurus pinima, Tropidurus psammonastes, Tropidurus semitaeniatus, Tropidurus sertanejo. Red circles represent data occurrence data produced in this study; Black circles represent data from literature. Ecorregions: 1: Brejos; 2: Complexo da Chapada Diamantina; 3: Complexo Ibiapaba – Araripe; 4: Depressão Sertaneja Meridional; 5: Depressão Sertaneja Setentrional; 6: Dunas do São Francisco; 7: Planalto da Borborema; 8: Raso Catarina and 9: São Francisco/Gurguéia.
Our study updates the list of Caatinga lizards, their endemism status, and also presents detailed distribution maps, environmental bioclimatic profiles, and species range data for all lizards. Moreover, we present patterns of taxonomic richness using occurrence data and quantify sampling gaps using the most comprehensive database for Caatinga lizards up to date. Thus, although lizards are the most studied group of reptiles in the Caatinga, the information synthesized herein and now available, has an unprecedented format. We show that 93 species have at least one record within Caatinga limits, updating the occurrence of thirteen new species in relation to the most current species synthesis (Ameivula pyrrhogularis, Calyptommatus frontalis, Calyptommatus sp. 1 and 2, Enyalius bilineatus, Gonatodes humeralis, Lygodactylus sp. 1 and 2, Leposoma scincoides, Notomabuya frenata, Ophiodes sp. 2, Phyllopezus diamantino, Phyllopezus selmae, and Tropidurus oreadicus), and revise and add eleven species to the list of endemics (Acratosaura mentalis, Calyptommatus frontalis, Calyptommatus sp. 1 and 2, Copeoglossum arajara, Hemidactylus agrius, Lygodactylus sp. 1 and 2, Phyllopezus diamantino, Phyllopezus selmae, and Tropidurus semitaeniatus), which now totals 49 endemic lizards. The maps presented here are the most up-to-date for each species, containing new occurrences even for species previously described or known to occur in the Caatinga.
The number of endemic lizards has increased in the last decade due to the description of several species, such as Ameivula confusioniba and A. nigrigula (Arias, Carvalho, Rodrigues & Zaher 2011); Calyptommatus frontalis Recoder, Marques-Souza, Silva-Soares, Ramiro, Castro & Rodrigues, 2022; Glaucomastix cyanura and G. venetacauda (Arias, Carvalho, Rodrigues & Zaher 2011); Phyllopezus diamantino Dubeux, Gonçalves, Palmeira, Nunes, Cassimiro, Gamble, Werneck, Rodrigues & Mott, 2022; Phyllopezus selmae Dubeux, Gonçalves, Palmeira, Nunes, Cassimiro, Gamble, Werneck, Rodrigues & Mott, 2022; Placosoma limaverdorum Borges-Nojosa, Caramaschi & Rodrigues 2016; Psilops mucugensis Rodrigues, Recoder, Teixeira Jr., Roscito, Guerrero, Nunes, Freitas, Fernandes, Bocchiglieri, Dal Vechio, Leite, Nogueira, Damasceno, Pellegrino, Argôlo & Amaro 2017; Tropidurus jaguaribanus Passos, Lima & Borges-Nojosa 2011; and T. sertanejo Carvalho, Sena, Peloso, Machado, Montesinos, Silva, Campbell & Rodrigues 2016. The currently known distribution of some species under description suggests that they are also endemic to the Caatinga, such as Aspronema aff. dorsivittatum (
The advances presented here were only possible after producing a database combining records from biological collections, unpublished field data, and records from the scientific literature incorporated after a careful and extensive search following principles of data quality (
Our analysis of the taxonomic richness pattern was performed using occurrence points, thus diverging from the synthesis presented by
Our distribution database also allowed us to quantify the coverage area of sampling regarding our spatial knowledge of the Caatinga lizards. Our data indicate the existence of records of at least one species in 373 municipalities, corresponding to an area of 521,183 km2 (47% of the Caatinga). Our sample shows an advance three times greater than the first synthesis of knowledge for the Caatinga, which had occurrence records for 112 municipalities and data collected primarily in one museum, the MZUSP (
The database is also not homogeneous in the number of records per taxon. Some species showed high numbers of occurrence records, for example, Tropidurus hispidus (5,218 records, the most recorded species), Ameivula ocellifera (1,626 records, the second most recorded species), and Polychrus acutirostris (1,200 records). Other species showed few records, probably because they are rare, threatened, narrowly distributed, and poorly represented in biological collections (
The advance in knowledge about Caatinga lizards, in each new syntheses published, legitimizes the crucial importance of taxonomic, distribution, and herpetological surveys studies in the region. In one of the first syntheses
The EOO shows that almost half of lizard species (44%) are narrowly distributed in the Caatinga (Appendix S4). For example, 15 endemics have less than 20 records each, 30 occur in only one state, and 19 occur in a single ecoregion. The rare microteiid Acratosaura spinosa has only three records, and its EOO is only 66 km2. Enyalius erythroceneus has seven known records (all in the type locality). Eurolophosaurus aff. divaricatus has four records and an EOO of 309 km2, obtained through a 10 km buffer. This taxon may be threatened even though it is in the process of taxonomic description. The restricted distribution pattern within the Caatinga is also observed in other herpetofaunal groups from the region, such as snakes (Apostolepis arenaria, A. gaboi;
Sixty-two species of Caatinga lizards have been assessed for their conservation status globally (
Most lizards from Caatinga have terrestrial habits (45 species, 48% of the total; Table
As knowledge of Caatinga’s biodiversity advances, its biological relevance in the Neotropics is better understood. Regarding herpetofauna, the high species richness and endemism are notorious and irrefutable, not only concentrated in specific regions (e.g., Brejos or Dunas do Rio São Francisco ecoregions), but also in large areas along the Caatinga where some species seem to have evolved. Nevertheless, the extensive sampling gap observed for lizards, which possibly also occurs in other groups of organisms, prevents a more precise understanding of the biological potential of the Caatinga.
The data presented here are a detailed synthesis of knowledge about the lizards of the Caatinga. These data are also an important product for planning lizard conservation actions accurately and for safeguarding the biological potential of the Caatinga, acting as an important step towards the production of a substantiated knowledge of the region’s lizard fauna. Moreover, our results point areas that deserve attention to research in order to advance our knowledge about Caatinga lizards: (i) we identify priority areas to concentrate lizard surveys, (ii) we indicate species that lack ecological data, mainly endemic species. Finally, our database will enable a continuous update of the occurrence database of Caatinga lizards, especially of poorly recorded species and poorly known areas.
The authors have declared that no competing interests exists.
The authors are grateful to all curators and technical manager of the biological collections visited by the authors and collaborators over many years of gathering data. We thank Davi Pantoja and Etielle Andrade for providing field data on lizards from the municipalities of Redenção Gurguéia and Pedro II, Piauí, respectively. We would like to thank to Daniel Passos, Davi Pantoja, José Cassimiro, Leonardo Carvalho, Marco Antônio de Freitas, Marcos Dubeux, Mauro Teixeira Júnior, Ricardo Marques, Samuel Ribeiro and Miguel T. Rodrigues for providing great photos of the species of lizards in life. We also would like to thank Pedro Nunes, Renato Recoder and Marcélia Basto for the help to get pictures of rare species. LRU thank to Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa e ao Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico do Maranhão (FAPEMA; BM01016-21) for the master degree scholarship; DOM, GRC thanks CNPq for the research fellowship. AAG thanks Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) for his productity research grant (#310942/2018-7). TBG is supported by Young Researcher grant 2022/09428-2 by São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP). This paper is part of both projects “Evolution and biogeography of the herpetofauna: patterns, process and implications for conservation in scenario of environmental and climate changes” funded by São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP, #2021/07161-6), and “Past, present and future of the Caatinga: history, ecology and conservation of the herpetofauna under climate change” funded by Foundation for Research Support of the State of Paraíba (FAPESQ-PB; Edital 006/2018).
Appendices S1–S8
Data type: .docx
Explanation note: Appendix S1. Voucher specimens of lizards of the Caatinga, organized by families and species in alphabetical order, and with its respective municipalities of occurrence. Acronyms – CHUNB: Coleção Herpetológica da Universidade de Brasília; CHUFPB: Coleção Herpetológica da Universidade Federal da Paraíba; CHUFS: Coleção Herpetológica da Universidade Federal de Sergipe; Coleção Herpetológica da Universidade Federal do Ceará; MUFAL: Museu de História Natural da Universidade Federal de Alagoas; MZUSP: Museu de Zoologia da Universidade de São Paulo; MNRJ: Museu Nacional da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro; UFC: Universidade Federal do Ceará; MZUFBA: Museu de Zoologia da Universidade Federal da Bahia; MZUFV: Museu de Zoologia da Universidade Federal de Viçosa; MZUEFS: Museu de Zoologia da Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana; ZUEC-REP: Coleção de Répteis do Museu de Zoologia da Universidade Estadual de Campinas; CBPII: Coleção Biológica do Instituto Federal do IFPI Pedro II; MBML: Museu de Biologia Professor Melo Leitão do Instituto Nacional da Mata Atlântica; LHUFCG: Laboratório de Herpetologia da Universidade Federal de Campina Grande. Field Number – GRCOLLI: Guarino Rinaldi Collli; AAGARDA: Adrian Garda; FRD: Fagner Ribeiro Delfim; ACF: Ana Cecília Falcão. — Appendix S2. Literature compilation used to obtain complementary data of lizard’s occurrences of the Caatinga. — Appendix S3. Range size of each species of lizards of the Caatinga region. The range size was calculated by Minimum Polygon Convex method (MCP) or buffer (see Material and Methods) organized by families and species in alphabetical order. — Appendix S4. Histogram representing the frequency of occurrence of species according to their Extent of Occurrence (EOO), calculated via MCP. — Appendix S5. Number of species and occurrences of lizards of the Caatinga organized by municipality. — Appendix S6. Species richness and endemism detected in the Caatinga ecoregions, Northeast Brazil. The numbers above bars show the percentage of Caatinga species detected in each ecoregion. Abbreviations: B: Brejos; CCD: Complexo da Chapada Diamantina; CIA: Complexo Ibiapaba – Araripe; DSM: Depressão Sertaneja Meridional; DSS: Depressão Sertaneja Setentrional; DSF: Dunas do São Francisco; PB: Planalto da Borborema; RC: Raso Catarina and SFG: São Francisco/Gurguéia. — Appendix S7. Species richness and endemism detected in the in the states that make up the Caatinga, Northeast Brazil. The numbers above the bars show the richness of species detected in each state. Abbreviations: AL: Alagoas; BA: Bahia; CE: Ceará; MG: Minas Gerais; PB: Paraíba; PE: Pernambuco; PI: Piauí; RN: Rio Grande do Norte and SE: Sergipe. — Appendix S8. Progression of the growth history of descriptions of new lizard species in the Caatinga. distances based on the 16S gene among all Occidozyga samples used in this study.